Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

PSA customers: qualification matters. 🇺🇸 For the SBR process explained in this video: • Current GOA member • Qualifying firearm from PSA • State/local law allows the configuration and other federal laws followed Individual components alone do NOT make an otherwise unrelated firearm qualify. For qualifying firearms and customers,... show more

Palmetto State Armory

230,515 subscribers

226,927 views • 14 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The win is here. Phase One starts NOW. 🇺🇸 Qualifying suppressor transactions at participating PSA locations in South Carolina can now move through a 4473 + normal background check without the separate Form 4 process described in the old system. And qualifying PSA-sourced suppressors through our direct dealer network may be covered. Watch the full breakdown. State/local laws apply. Not legal advice. If you have questions, consult an attorney. Gun Owners of America

The win is here. Phase One starts NOW. 🇺🇸 Qualifying suppressor transactions at participating PSA locations in South Carolina can now move through a 4473 + normal background check without the separate Form 4 process described in the old system. And qualifying PSA-sourced suppressors through our direct dealer network may be covered. Watch the full breakdown. State/local laws apply. Not legal advice. If you have questions, consult an attorney. Gun Owners of America

Palmetto State Armory

164,154 views • 15 days ago

With the new changes to NFA Tax Stamps, many are asking how AR Pistols can be legally converted to a short-barreled rifle. In this video, we provide a general overview of the process. Always research and abide by your local laws and restrictions before continuing with the Form-1 process. DISCLAIMER: This video is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel or the ATF directly if you have questions specific to your situation. Firearms laws, regulations, and enforcement policies, including those administered by the ATF, are complex, vary by federal, state, and local jurisdiction, and are subject to change without notice. The information presented may not reflect the most current legal or regulatory developments. Viewers are solely responsible for determining whether the manufacture, possession, or use of any firearm or regulated item is lawful in their jurisdiction and for ensuring full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations before taking any action. Palmetto State Armory is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the ATF or any other government agency. All actions taken based on this information are done at the viewer’s own risk. All firearms presented in this video are in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. Always shoot responsibly.

With the new changes to NFA Tax Stamps, many are asking how AR Pistols can be legally converted to a short-barreled rifle. In this video, we provide a general overview of the process. Always research and abide by your local laws and restrictions before continuing with the Form-1 process. DISCLAIMER: This video is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel or the ATF directly if you have questions specific to your situation. Firearms laws, regulations, and enforcement policies, including those administered by the ATF, are complex, vary by federal, state, and local jurisdiction, and are subject to change without notice. The information presented may not reflect the most current legal or regulatory developments. Viewers are solely responsible for determining whether the manufacture, possession, or use of any firearm or regulated item is lawful in their jurisdiction and for ensuring full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations before taking any action. Palmetto State Armory is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the ATF or any other government agency. All actions taken based on this information are done at the viewer’s own risk. All firearms presented in this video are in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. Always shoot responsibly.

Palmetto State Armory

48,472 views • 6 months ago

NO MORE FORM 4? NO MORE FINGERPRINTS? NO MORE WAITING ON THE ATF? A federal court just handed gun owners a major victory and it could completely change the process for qualifying PSA customers seeking suppressors, SBRs, and SBSs. Here’s what the ruling actually means and what still has to happen next. Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. Gun Owners of America SilencerCo B&T USA silencershopfoundation

NO MORE FORM 4? NO MORE FINGERPRINTS? NO MORE WAITING ON THE ATF? A federal court just handed gun owners a major victory and it could completely change the process for qualifying PSA customers seeking suppressors, SBRs, and SBSs. Here’s what the ruling actually means and what still has to happen next. Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. Gun Owners of America SilencerCo B&T USA silencershopfoundation

Palmetto State Armory

171,326 views • 21 days ago

California, we hear you.🇺🇸 Palmetto State Armory is introducing our new lineup of California-configured builds—giving more law-abiding Americans access to dependable firearms that are configured around California’s current fixed-magazine requirements. We will have several variants from our Freedom, Guardsman, and Sabre lines. Full details in the video! Set your reminders for this Friday, July 31st at 4:30pm ET. This configuration is intended to meet California’s current fixed-magazine requirements. It is not a guarantee of legal compliance for every buyer or use. Laws vary by jurisdiction and can change. Buyers are responsible for confirming compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local law before purchase, transfer, or modification. This video is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice.

California, we hear you.🇺🇸 Palmetto State Armory is introducing our new lineup of California-configured builds—giving more law-abiding Americans access to dependable firearms that are configured around California’s current fixed-magazine requirements. We will have several variants from our Freedom, Guardsman, and Sabre lines. Full details in the video! Set your reminders for this Friday, July 31st at 4:30pm ET. This configuration is intended to meet California’s current fixed-magazine requirements. It is not a guarantee of legal compliance for every buyer or use. Laws vary by jurisdiction and can change. Buyers are responsible for confirming compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local law before purchase, transfer, or modification. This video is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice.

Palmetto State Armory

69,733 views • 1 month ago

The biggest change to silencer laws in 90+ years. Starting tomorrow, August 13 at 12:01 AM, silencers and AOWs gotten through Silencer Shop can transfer with no Form 4, no federal registration, and no wait. What you need to know: Applies in the 27 states with no state-level NFA laws. 15 states still require a Form 4. The silencer must come from Silencer Shop or a Powered By Silencer Shop dealer. SBRs and SBSs are not included. The 1968 Gun Control Act still requires ATF approval, so a Form 4 is still required. The tax is gone, but the paperwork isn’t. The government can still appeal, so we'll keep you posted if anything changes. Thank you to our partners in this fight: silencershopfoundation Gun Owners of America Palmetto State Armory SilencerCo B&T USA Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. SAF and YOU. We sued the ATF. We won. And we’re not done fighting for you.

The biggest change to silencer laws in 90+ years. Starting tomorrow, August 13 at 12:01 AM, silencers and AOWs gotten through Silencer Shop can transfer with no Form 4, no federal registration, and no wait. What you need to know: Applies in the 27 states with no state-level NFA laws. 15 states still require a Form 4. The silencer must come from Silencer Shop or a Powered By Silencer Shop dealer. SBRs and SBSs are not included. The 1968 Gun Control Act still requires ATF approval, so a Form 4 is still required. The tax is gone, but the paperwork isn’t. The government can still appeal, so we'll keep you posted if anything changes. Thank you to our partners in this fight: silencershopfoundation Gun Owners of America Palmetto State Armory SilencerCo B&T USA Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. SAF and YOU. We sued the ATF. We won. And we’re not done fighting for you.

SilencerShop

357,569 views • 15 days ago

The Second Amendment is quintessential to the American story. There isn’t a United States without arms, there isn’t an end to the Civil War without arms. There isn’t any meaningful resistance to the horrors of the Jim Crow era without Southern Blacks being armed against tyrannical local and state governments, despite anti-2A laws to disarm them. The irony is some of those same laws have been cited today by states such as Hawaii and North Carolina to justify firearm restrictions. Some of the most consequential moments in American history have involved firearms in some capacity. It’s a rich part of our history that shouldn’t be infringed. Despite the statistical fact that law-abiding gun owners rarely ever commit firearms related offenses, despite the fact that Americans of all backgrounds enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by the Second Amendment for a multitude of purposes, anti-Second Amendment political leaders like the governor in my state of Virginia continue restricting the rights of Virginians under the guise of public safety. If the governor and her Democratic majority truly want to address public safety, they should focus on improving the education in underserved areas, focus on expanding economic opportunities that put men to work, providing a mentorship pipeline for young men, and incentivizing stronger family units. All of those efforts would produce far better outcomes in reducing crime than violating the rights of law-abiding gun owners. So we’ll continue to enjoy this right on the range, at shooting competitions, while hunting as we challenge the state in court for its obvious violation of the second amendment. The following groups need the support of gun owners as lawsuits are extremely costly: SAF, NRA, Gun Owners of America, National Association for Gun Rights,vcdl.org, Firearms Policy Coalition, NSSF—The Firearm Industry Trade Association

The Second Amendment is quintessential to the American story. There isn’t a United States without arms, there isn’t an end to the Civil War without arms. There isn’t any meaningful resistance to the horrors of the Jim Crow era without Southern Blacks being armed against tyrannical local and state governments, despite anti-2A laws to disarm them. The irony is some of those same laws have been cited today by states such as Hawaii and North Carolina to justify firearm restrictions. Some of the most consequential moments in American history have involved firearms in some capacity. It’s a rich part of our history that shouldn’t be infringed. Despite the statistical fact that law-abiding gun owners rarely ever commit firearms related offenses, despite the fact that Americans of all backgrounds enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by the Second Amendment for a multitude of purposes, anti-Second Amendment political leaders like the governor in my state of Virginia continue restricting the rights of Virginians under the guise of public safety. If the governor and her Democratic majority truly want to address public safety, they should focus on improving the education in underserved areas, focus on expanding economic opportunities that put men to work, providing a mentorship pipeline for young men, and incentivizing stronger family units. All of those efforts would produce far better outcomes in reducing crime than violating the rights of law-abiding gun owners. So we’ll continue to enjoy this right on the range, at shooting competitions, while hunting as we challenge the state in court for its obvious violation of the second amendment. The following groups need the support of gun owners as lawsuits are extremely costly: SAF, NRA, Gun Owners of America, National Association for Gun Rights,vcdl.org, Firearms Policy Coalition, NSSF—The Firearm Industry Trade Association

Shermichael Singleton

14,702 views • 3 months ago

In Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF, the court threw out the NFA's registration and approval scheme for suppressors, SBRs, and SBSs. Form 1. Form 4. ATF wait period. NFA Registry. All gone. And because we won, you win too. The ruling covers all Silencer Shop customers, current and future. The court paused its own ruling for seven days to give the government time to appeal, and that pause can get extended. Big thanks to everyone who donated to SSF and our partners in this fight: Gun Owners of America , Palmetto State Armory , SilencerCo , B&T USA , SAF , and Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc.

In Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF, the court threw out the NFA's registration and approval scheme for suppressors, SBRs, and SBSs. Form 1. Form 4. ATF wait period. NFA Registry. All gone. And because we won, you win too. The ruling covers all Silencer Shop customers, current and future. The court paused its own ruling for seven days to give the government time to appeal, and that pause can get extended. Big thanks to everyone who donated to SSF and our partners in this fight: Gun Owners of America , Palmetto State Armory , SilencerCo , B&T USA , SAF , and Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc.

SilencerShop

405,949 views • 22 days ago

California State Rep Carl DeMaio confirms Governor Gavin Newsom is “launching an online portal for Californians to report illegal, unlawful activity by ICE agents and other federal law enforcement personnel” The California Department of Justice will then target the ICE officers From Gavin Newsom Press: “Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a new online portal to assist members of the public in sharing information with the California Department of Justice regarding potentially unlawful activity by federal agents and officers across the state. Federal agents have broad authority to enforce federal laws, including federal immigration laws, but they must do so lawfully. The portal, which allows Californians to submit video and photos, will help the California Department of Justice create a record of potential unlawful conduct by federal agents, and inform possible legal actions the state may take to protect Californians’ rights”

California State Rep Carl DeMaio confirms Governor Gavin Newsom is “launching an online portal for Californians to report illegal, unlawful activity by ICE agents and other federal law enforcement personnel” The California Department of Justice will then target the ICE officers From Gavin Newsom Press: “Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a new online portal to assist members of the public in sharing information with the California Department of Justice regarding potentially unlawful activity by federal agents and officers across the state. Federal agents have broad authority to enforce federal laws, including federal immigration laws, but they must do so lawfully. The portal, which allows Californians to submit video and photos, will help the California Department of Justice create a record of potential unlawful conduct by federal agents, and inform possible legal actions the state may take to protect Californians’ rights”

Wall Street Apes

19,278 views • 8 months ago

Is this not the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever heard? In fact it is easier for a 13 year old kid to buy a gun than it is for them to buy Sudafed in some states. In some states, a 13-year-old can walk into a gun show and LEGALLY buy a gun from a private seller. Don’t believe me? Watch this 7-year old video below. The sale of firearms by private sellers, often referred to as "private sales" or "private transfers," is subject to state laws, and regulations can vary significantly from one state to another. In some states, it is legal for someone under 18 to purchase a firearm from a private seller. Federal law does generally prohibits the sale of guns to individuals under 18. However, there are some exceptions and variations in state laws. Private sales are one of those exceptions, and in many states private sales can take place at gun shows without a background check being required. Can anyone honestly say they are OK with this?

Is this not the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever heard? In fact it is easier for a 13 year old kid to buy a gun than it is for them to buy Sudafed in some states. In some states, a 13-year-old can walk into a gun show and LEGALLY buy a gun from a private seller. Don’t believe me? Watch this 7-year old video below. The sale of firearms by private sellers, often referred to as "private sales" or "private transfers," is subject to state laws, and regulations can vary significantly from one state to another. In some states, it is legal for someone under 18 to purchase a firearm from a private seller. Federal law does generally prohibits the sale of guns to individuals under 18. However, there are some exceptions and variations in state laws. Private sales are one of those exceptions, and in many states private sales can take place at gun shows without a background check being required. Can anyone honestly say they are OK with this?

Ed Krassenstein

727,867 views • 2 years ago

Twin Cities mayors are seeking the authority to implement local gun control measures. This push stems from the current Minnesota state law, which largely prevents cities from enacting their own firearm restrictions. The mayors, including Jacob Frey of Minneapolis and Melvin Carter of St. Paul, are calling for a statewide and federal ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. The effort comes as Governor Tim Walz plans to call a special legislative session to address gun violence, but it's not clear exactly what bills could find support in the legislature.

Twin Cities mayors are seeking the authority to implement local gun control measures. This push stems from the current Minnesota state law, which largely prevents cities from enacting their own firearm restrictions. The mayors, including Jacob Frey of Minneapolis and Melvin Carter of St. Paul, are calling for a statewide and federal ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. The effort comes as Governor Tim Walz plans to call a special legislative session to address gun violence, but it's not clear exactly what bills could find support in the legislature.

FOX 9

14,063 views • 11 months ago

Kentucky doesn’t need to codify federal gun control. Yesterday in Judiciary Committee, legislators heard a bill proposal that would change Kentucky law to adopt a federal firearm restriction. I’m vehemently opposed to gun control at the federal level—why on earth would we want to codify it into a state law here in the Commonwealth?! As a stalwart defender of our Second Amendment Rights, it is my hope that federal firearm restrictions will be repealed by Congress, or at least overturned like the bump stock ban. The last thing we need is more gun control at the state level. Those of us working to repeal existing gun control laws already have our hands full! This is Kentucky, and our right to keep and bear arms is not negotiable. 🇺🇸

Kentucky doesn’t need to codify federal gun control. Yesterday in Judiciary Committee, legislators heard a bill proposal that would change Kentucky law to adopt a federal firearm restriction. I’m vehemently opposed to gun control at the federal level—why on earth would we want to codify it into a state law here in the Commonwealth?! As a stalwart defender of our Second Amendment Rights, it is my hope that federal firearm restrictions will be repealed by Congress, or at least overturned like the bump stock ban. The last thing we need is more gun control at the state level. Those of us working to repeal existing gun control laws already have our hands full! This is Kentucky, and our right to keep and bear arms is not negotiable. 🇺🇸

Savannah Maddox

32,261 views • 11 months ago

AG Pam Bondi praises law enforcement for cracking the case in the Charlie Kirk assassination and says justice will be served: "The FBI worked long and hard from day one and got this case solved. They worked hand in hand with the local agencies, then gave the gun to the ATF, got the DNA off the firearm, and the DNA matched the defendant in the case. The state government is prosecuting now, and they will most likely indict tomorrow or later this week. They will indict him for first-degree murder, and I think the governor has said they want to seek the death penalty, which is very real in Utah—and they still have the firing squad there. Then we, as federal prosecutors, will look to see if we have federal charges as well, and of course, if we do, we will also indict and work hand in hand with the state to ensure this individual faces the maximum extent of the law."

AG Pam Bondi praises law enforcement for cracking the case in the Charlie Kirk assassination and says justice will be served: "The FBI worked long and hard from day one and got this case solved. They worked hand in hand with the local agencies, then gave the gun to the ATF, got the DNA off the firearm, and the DNA matched the defendant in the case. The state government is prosecuting now, and they will most likely indict tomorrow or later this week. They will indict him for first-degree murder, and I think the governor has said they want to seek the death penalty, which is very real in Utah—and they still have the firing squad there. Then we, as federal prosecutors, will look to see if we have federal charges as well, and of course, if we do, we will also indict and work hand in hand with the state to ensure this individual faces the maximum extent of the law."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

117,425 views • 11 months ago

The Firearms Control Amendment Bill cannot be steamrolled through Parliament. In the Portfolio Committee on Police, I raised a serious concern with the Civilian Secretariat for Police Service. On slide 9 of their presentation, the Secretariat referred to the review of the Firearms Control Amendment Bill and used the words “to ensure enactment.” That wording matters. It suggests that the outcome has already been decided: push the Bill through, and treat Parliament and public participation as process boxes to tick afterwards. I asked the Secretariat directly whether they intend to advance the Bill in its current form, or whether they are prepared to substantially reconsider it based on actual evidence and stakeholder input. Because right now, the approach does not line up with the serious concerns raised by stakeholders, the slow Nedlac process, and the failures we already see in the current firearm control system. My question was simple: Why is the Department prioritising further legislative restriction before demonstrating measurable improvements in: -the Central Firearms Registry; -SAPS’s own firearm losses; -illegal firearm recovery; -firearm tracing; -ballistic capacity; and -actual enforcement against criminal possession of firearms? I also made it clear: the Portfolio Committee on Police is not a rubber stamp. The Secretariat then made an important concession. They accepted that the word “enactment” may need to be revised. More importantly, they confirmed that they have commissioned research into whether the current firearm legislation is actually being fully implemented, and what the failures in implementation are. The most important line from the response was this: “We can’t rush to the amendment of legislation if, for instance, it’s the failures of the implementation of the current legislation.” That is exactly the point. Marco van Niekerk captured this well in his article. The concern is that government appears to be moving towards new restrictions before properly diagnosing the real problem. He also points out that the failures are not theoretical: CFR dysfunction, state firearm losses, weak tracing capability, and limited enforcement against criminal possession of illegal firearms are all part of the problem. (Here is Marco’s article on The Common Sense: And to add insult to injury, this past week the SANDF confirmed that military weapons were stolen from Tek Base in Lyttelton. Reports state that three R4 assault rifles and a grenade launcher were stolen after a break-in was discovered on 27 April. Access was suspected to have been gained by cutting a hole in the perimeter fence, and a burglar door was forced open. That raises obvious questions. Where were the controls? Was there functioning CCTV? Were there alarm systems? Were there access logs? Were there armed patrols? Were inventories being audited? How can military-grade weapons be stolen from a base while government wants to tell law-abiding citizens that the problem is that they are not regulated enough? This is the contradiction. The State loses firearms. The State fails to secure military weapons. The State struggles with tracing and ballistics. The CFR remains dysfunctional. Criminals continue to possess illegal firearms. But the policy answer is apparently more restriction on lawful firearm owners. That is not good enough. South Africa does not need symbolic legislation. We need enforcement. We need working systems. We need accountability. We need functioning ballistics. We need a competent CFR. We need state-owned firearms secured. We need illegal firearms recovered. We need criminals prosecuted. Any revised Firearms Control Amendment Bill must be evidence-based, transparent and properly consulted on. No steamrolling. No predetermined enactment. No rubber-stamping. Fix the State’s failures first.

The Firearms Control Amendment Bill cannot be steamrolled through Parliament. In the Portfolio Committee on Police, I raised a serious concern with the Civilian Secretariat for Police Service. On slide 9 of their presentation, the Secretariat referred to the review of the Firearms Control Amendment Bill and used the words “to ensure enactment.” That wording matters. It suggests that the outcome has already been decided: push the Bill through, and treat Parliament and public participation as process boxes to tick afterwards. I asked the Secretariat directly whether they intend to advance the Bill in its current form, or whether they are prepared to substantially reconsider it based on actual evidence and stakeholder input. Because right now, the approach does not line up with the serious concerns raised by stakeholders, the slow Nedlac process, and the failures we already see in the current firearm control system. My question was simple: Why is the Department prioritising further legislative restriction before demonstrating measurable improvements in: -the Central Firearms Registry; -SAPS’s own firearm losses; -illegal firearm recovery; -firearm tracing; -ballistic capacity; and -actual enforcement against criminal possession of firearms? I also made it clear: the Portfolio Committee on Police is not a rubber stamp. The Secretariat then made an important concession. They accepted that the word “enactment” may need to be revised. More importantly, they confirmed that they have commissioned research into whether the current firearm legislation is actually being fully implemented, and what the failures in implementation are. The most important line from the response was this: “We can’t rush to the amendment of legislation if, for instance, it’s the failures of the implementation of the current legislation.” That is exactly the point. Marco van Niekerk captured this well in his article. The concern is that government appears to be moving towards new restrictions before properly diagnosing the real problem. He also points out that the failures are not theoretical: CFR dysfunction, state firearm losses, weak tracing capability, and limited enforcement against criminal possession of illegal firearms are all part of the problem. (Here is Marco’s article on The Common Sense: And to add insult to injury, this past week the SANDF confirmed that military weapons were stolen from Tek Base in Lyttelton. Reports state that three R4 assault rifles and a grenade launcher were stolen after a break-in was discovered on 27 April. Access was suspected to have been gained by cutting a hole in the perimeter fence, and a burglar door was forced open. That raises obvious questions. Where were the controls? Was there functioning CCTV? Were there alarm systems? Were there access logs? Were there armed patrols? Were inventories being audited? How can military-grade weapons be stolen from a base while government wants to tell law-abiding citizens that the problem is that they are not regulated enough? This is the contradiction. The State loses firearms. The State fails to secure military weapons. The State struggles with tracing and ballistics. The CFR remains dysfunctional. Criminals continue to possess illegal firearms. But the policy answer is apparently more restriction on lawful firearm owners. That is not good enough. South Africa does not need symbolic legislation. We need enforcement. We need working systems. We need accountability. We need functioning ballistics. We need a competent CFR. We need state-owned firearms secured. We need illegal firearms recovered. We need criminals prosecuted. Any revised Firearms Control Amendment Bill must be evidence-based, transparent and properly consulted on. No steamrolling. No predetermined enactment. No rubber-stamping. Fix the State’s failures first.

Ian Cameron

15,352 views • 3 months ago

Last week, a federal judge put a seven-day hold on the NFA ruling so the Justice Department could run to the Fifth Circuit and stop it before it took effect. That clock ran out. DOJ did not stop it. So now we have a legally bizarre situation: two people can walk into the same gun store, reach for the same suppressor, and one may be covered by the ruling while the other may still be committing a federal felony. The judge did not turn off the NFA for all of America. The relief applies to the plaintiffs, their members, their customers, and the covered entities in the case. Living in one of the plaintiff states does not automatically cover you personally. That means dealers are stuck in the middle, customers are confused, and everyone is waiting to see whether DOJ appeals within the larger window it still has left. So yes, this is a real win. But no, don’t get stupid. If your suppressor or SBR is sitting in eForms, talk to your dealer, figure out whether you are actually covered, and do not take legal advice from a comment section. The tax went to zero, and the government still wanted the paperwork. That tells you what the paperwork was really for.

Last week, a federal judge put a seven-day hold on the NFA ruling so the Justice Department could run to the Fifth Circuit and stop it before it took effect. That clock ran out. DOJ did not stop it. So now we have a legally bizarre situation: two people can walk into the same gun store, reach for the same suppressor, and one may be covered by the ruling while the other may still be committing a federal felony. The judge did not turn off the NFA for all of America. The relief applies to the plaintiffs, their members, their customers, and the covered entities in the case. Living in one of the plaintiff states does not automatically cover you personally. That means dealers are stuck in the middle, customers are confused, and everyone is waiting to see whether DOJ appeals within the larger window it still has left. So yes, this is a real win. But no, don’t get stupid. If your suppressor or SBR is sitting in eForms, talk to your dealer, figure out whether you are actually covered, and do not take legal advice from a comment section. The tax went to zero, and the government still wanted the paperwork. That tells you what the paperwork was really for.

Colion Noir

46,987 views • 5 days ago

.Matt Gorman: "There's a very simple remedy to [the unrest in Minneapolis]. Let state and local law enforcement let ICE into the jails to get the worst of the worst out. This is happening because they aren't cooperating and we're seeing this in Virginia as well. One of the first things Abigail Spanberger did was revoke a Youngkin executive order so state and local are not compelled to enforced immigration law. The goal of Democrats is to make all this enforcement as messy and as complicated as possible so you get a lot of these scenes. And, look, for the last couple years Democrats have preached that we're a nation of laws, we're a nation of laws except when it comes to enforcing immigration laws or, in the Clintons, the need to comply with a subpoena. Then, the law is merely a suggestion. If you wanna comply with it, it's up to you." Marie Harf: "So, you're okay with these videos?"

.Matt Gorman: "There's a very simple remedy to [the unrest in Minneapolis]. Let state and local law enforcement let ICE into the jails to get the worst of the worst out. This is happening because they aren't cooperating and we're seeing this in Virginia as well. One of the first things Abigail Spanberger did was revoke a Youngkin executive order so state and local are not compelled to enforced immigration law. The goal of Democrats is to make all this enforcement as messy and as complicated as possible so you get a lot of these scenes. And, look, for the last couple years Democrats have preached that we're a nation of laws, we're a nation of laws except when it comes to enforcing immigration laws or, in the Clintons, the need to comply with a subpoena. Then, the law is merely a suggestion. If you wanna comply with it, it's up to you." Marie Harf: "So, you're okay with these videos?"

Curtis Houck

27,575 views • 7 months ago

For years Democrats in California have been attacking one of our foundational constitutional rights: the right to bear arms. As governor, working with Vote Michael E. Gates for California Attorney Gen. as AG, I will do everything in my power to restore 2nd Amendment rights. Today we announced the plan: - Day 1 Executive Order requiring state government and all state agencies to be 2A compliant - Day 1 directive to all counties to comply with concealed carry law - Review all California's firearm laws for constitutionality Watch the announcement and read our full plan below 👇

For years Democrats in California have been attacking one of our foundational constitutional rights: the right to bear arms. As governor, working with Vote Michael E. Gates for California Attorney Gen. as AG, I will do everything in my power to restore 2nd Amendment rights. Today we announced the plan: - Day 1 Executive Order requiring state government and all state agencies to be 2A compliant - Day 1 directive to all counties to comply with concealed carry law - Review all California's firearm laws for constitutionality Watch the announcement and read our full plan below 👇

Steve Hilton

33,646 views • 5 months ago