Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Pseudospectral Mirage of Matrices We usually judge a matrix by its eigenvalues, but sometimes the eigenvalues are only the bait. The real monster is hiding in the pseudospectrum. Most of the time, a matrix is shown as a few points in the complex plane called eigenvalues. But for some... matrices, especially non-normal matrices, those few points do not tell the whole story. In this scene, the complex plane becomes a moving landscape. The bright anchors are the true eigenvalues. Around them, huge pseudospectral continents grow, split, and collapse as the matrix changes. The moving threads show where the matrix is most sensitive. In those regions, even a tiny change can create a huge response. This is the hidden instability of a matrix made visible. Algebra becomes a pressure map and the pseudospectrum becomes terrain. #Mathematics #LinearAlgebra #SpectralTheory #NumericalAnalysis #MatrixTheory #MathArt #MathematicalArt #STEM #Artshow more

Mathelirium

36,629 subscribers

29,171 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Kunst Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Trap in Every Mathematics Lecture If you’ve taken a lot of math courses, you start to recognize a pattern. There’s a moment where the lecturer is warming up with the obvious stuff...add matrices entrywise, scale by α, do the row-column product...and you’re thinking, alright… where is this going? Then you relax. You stop resisting. And right there, they slip in one line that changes how you see the whole subject. When Benedict Gross says "matrices represent linear operators,"he’s telling you to stop treating a matrix as a rectangle of numbers and start treating it as an action. A linear operator is a function T: Rⁿ → Rⁿ that respects two rules: T(u+v)=T(u)+T(v) and T(αu)=αT(u). Once you pick a basis, T is completely determined by where it sends the basis vectors e₁,…,eₙ. Put T(e₁),…,T(eₙ) into columns and you get a matrix A. That is what "A represents T" means...A is the coordinate portrait of the transformation. Now the punchline that makes matrix multiplication feel inevitable. If B represents S and A represents T, then doing S first and then T is the composition T∘S. In coordinates that becomes A(Bx)=(AB)x. So multiplying matrices is really composing transformations. That’s why multiplication is usually not commutative: T∘S is generally not the same transformation as S∘T, and the matrices inherit that noncommutativity. This explains half of Linear Algebra because it tells you what the course is really about...functions that move vectors around, not grids of numbers. A matrix is just the written form of that function once you choose coordinates. Then the rules stop feeling random Multiplying matrices means doing one move and then another, an inverse means you can undo the move, eigenvectors are directions that don’t get turned, and changing basis is just describing the same move in a different language. That one idea makes a lot of linear algebra click. #LinearAlgebra #Matrices #GroupTheory #GLn #MathLectures #Mathematics

The Trap in Every Mathematics Lecture If you’ve taken a lot of math courses, you start to recognize a pattern. There’s a moment where the lecturer is warming up with the obvious stuff...add matrices entrywise, scale by α, do the row-column product...and you’re thinking, alright… where is this going? Then you relax. You stop resisting. And right there, they slip in one line that changes how you see the whole subject. When Benedict Gross says "matrices represent linear operators,"he’s telling you to stop treating a matrix as a rectangle of numbers and start treating it as an action. A linear operator is a function T: Rⁿ → Rⁿ that respects two rules: T(u+v)=T(u)+T(v) and T(αu)=αT(u). Once you pick a basis, T is completely determined by where it sends the basis vectors e₁,…,eₙ. Put T(e₁),…,T(eₙ) into columns and you get a matrix A. That is what "A represents T" means...A is the coordinate portrait of the transformation. Now the punchline that makes matrix multiplication feel inevitable. If B represents S and A represents T, then doing S first and then T is the composition T∘S. In coordinates that becomes A(Bx)=(AB)x. So multiplying matrices is really composing transformations. That’s why multiplication is usually not commutative: T∘S is generally not the same transformation as S∘T, and the matrices inherit that noncommutativity. This explains half of Linear Algebra because it tells you what the course is really about...functions that move vectors around, not grids of numbers. A matrix is just the written form of that function once you choose coordinates. Then the rules stop feeling random Multiplying matrices means doing one move and then another, an inverse means you can undo the move, eigenvectors are directions that don’t get turned, and changing basis is just describing the same move in a different language. That one idea makes a lot of linear algebra click. #LinearAlgebra #Matrices #GroupTheory #GLn #MathLectures #Mathematics

Mathelirium

66,892 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Introducing Operation Matrix Because Matrix operations generally break kids’ brains on whiteboards… Matrices aren't just numbers- they are transformations in space Now can actually SEE the geometry: every addition, multiplication, inverse, eigenvalue, and eigenvector becomes a transformation in real-time space. What it visualizes: • Basic ops (add/subtract/multiply) • Transpose, Invert, Adjugated • Cross products + Determinant • Matrix powers + Eigenvalues/Eigenvectors #LinearAlgebra #CreativeCoding #ThreeJS #ReactThreeFiber #MathVisualization #EdTech #WebGL #STEM React-three-fiber Three.js

Introducing Operation Matrix Because Matrix operations generally break kids’ brains on whiteboards… Matrices aren't just numbers- they are transformations in space Now can actually SEE the geometry: every addition, multiplication, inverse, eigenvalue, and eigenvector becomes a transformation in real-time space. What it visualizes: • Basic ops (add/subtract/multiply) • Transpose, Invert, Adjugated • Cross products + Determinant • Matrix powers + Eigenvalues/Eigenvectors #LinearAlgebra #CreativeCoding #ThreeJS #ReactThreeFiber #MathVisualization #EdTech #WebGL #STEM React-three-fiber Three.js

shadows

58,889 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is a great lecture at MIT by David Shirokoff on Markov Chains. He covers the fundamentals of Markov Chains using a simple particle movement example. He starts by explaining how a particle moves between two positions, A & B, with different probabilities. From there, the talk converts the problem into matrix form using a Markov matrix. The main topics covered are: - Transition probabilities - Markov matrices - Probability vectors - Matrix multiplication in Markov Chains - Finding probabilities after n steps - Eigenvalues and eigenvectors - Matrix diagonalization - Long-term steady state distribution

This is a great lecture at MIT by David Shirokoff on Markov Chains. He covers the fundamentals of Markov Chains using a simple particle movement example. He starts by explaining how a particle moves between two positions, A & B, with different probabilities. From there, the talk converts the problem into matrix form using a Markov matrix. The main topics covered are: - Transition probabilities - Markov matrices - Probability vectors - Matrix multiplication in Markov Chains - Finding probabilities after n steps - Eigenvalues and eigenvectors - Matrix diagonalization - Long-term steady state distribution

𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗿𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗻𝗮— 𝗲/𝗮𝗰𝗰

141,709 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Trap in Every Mathematics Lecture If you’ve taken enough math courses, you start noticing the same little move. The lecturer warms up with the obvious stuff, add matrices entrywise, scale by α, do the row-column product, and you’re thinking alright, where is this going. Then you relax. You stop resisting. And right there, they drop one line that quietly rewires the whole subject. When Benedict Gross says matrices represent linear operators, he’s telling you to stop treating a matrix as a rectangle of numbers and start treating it as an action. A linear operator is a function T: ℝⁿ → ℝⁿ that respects two rules: T(u+v) = T(u) + T(v) T(αu) = αT(u) Once you pick a basis, T is completely determined by where it sends the basis vectors e₁,…,eₙ. Put T(e₁),…,T(eₙ) into columns and you get a matrix A. That is what A represents T means. A is the coordinate portrait of the transformation. Now the punchline that makes matrix multiplication feel inevitable. If B represents S and A represents T, then doing S first and then T is the composition T∘S. In coordinates that becomes A(Bx) = (AB)x. So multiplying matrices is really composing transformations. That’s why multiplication is usually not commutative. T∘S is generally not the same transformation as S∘T, and the matrices inherit that noncommutativity. This explains half of linear algebra because it tells you what the course is really about: functions that move vectors around, not grids of numbers. A matrix is just the written form of that function once you choose coordinates. After that, the rules stop feeling random. Multiplying matrices means doing one move and then another. An inverse means you can undo the move. Eigenvectors are directions that don’t get turned. Changing basis is just describing the same move in a different language. One idea, and a lot of linear algebra suddenly clicks. #LinearAlgebra #Matrices #LinearMaps #Eigenvectors #ChangeOfBasis #Mathematics

The Trap in Every Mathematics Lecture If you’ve taken enough math courses, you start noticing the same little move. The lecturer warms up with the obvious stuff, add matrices entrywise, scale by α, do the row-column product, and you’re thinking alright, where is this going. Then you relax. You stop resisting. And right there, they drop one line that quietly rewires the whole subject. When Benedict Gross says matrices represent linear operators, he’s telling you to stop treating a matrix as a rectangle of numbers and start treating it as an action. A linear operator is a function T: ℝⁿ → ℝⁿ that respects two rules: T(u+v) = T(u) + T(v) T(αu) = αT(u) Once you pick a basis, T is completely determined by where it sends the basis vectors e₁,…,eₙ. Put T(e₁),…,T(eₙ) into columns and you get a matrix A. That is what A represents T means. A is the coordinate portrait of the transformation. Now the punchline that makes matrix multiplication feel inevitable. If B represents S and A represents T, then doing S first and then T is the composition T∘S. In coordinates that becomes A(Bx) = (AB)x. So multiplying matrices is really composing transformations. That’s why multiplication is usually not commutative. T∘S is generally not the same transformation as S∘T, and the matrices inherit that noncommutativity. This explains half of linear algebra because it tells you what the course is really about: functions that move vectors around, not grids of numbers. A matrix is just the written form of that function once you choose coordinates. After that, the rules stop feeling random. Multiplying matrices means doing one move and then another. An inverse means you can undo the move. Eigenvectors are directions that don’t get turned. Changing basis is just describing the same move in a different language. One idea, and a lot of linear algebra suddenly clicks. #LinearAlgebra #Matrices #LinearMaps #Eigenvectors #ChangeOfBasis #Mathematics

Mathelirium

133,454 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

When the Lorenz Attractor Becomes a Cosmos Many of us have seen plots of the famous Lorenz system that famous butterfly-shaped chaos: ẋ = σ(y - x) ẏ = x(ρ - z) - y ż = xy - βz But here, we went one layer deeper. At every point (x, y, z), we computed the local Jacobian matrix, J(x, y, z) = [ -σ σ 0 ] [ ρ - z -1 - x ] [ y x - β ] Then we found its eigenvalues λ and plotted them in the complex plane. Re(λ) tells us whether nearby motion is locally growing or decaying. Im(λ) tells us whether that local motion is rotating. That gives us the spectral flow of the Lorenz system and not the attractor itself, but the hidden local linear geometry driving its instability. When I saw that flow, it looked strangely cosmic with two mirrored swarms curling like particles trapped in a mathematical whirlpool. So I mapped that spectral flow onto our living fabric, not as Einstein Spacetime this time, but as a creative geometric stage for chaos itself. #LorenzSystem #ChaosTheory #DynamicalSystems #Eigenvalues #SpectralFlow #ComplexPlane #NonlinearDynamics #Mathematics #Physics

When the Lorenz Attractor Becomes a Cosmos Many of us have seen plots of the famous Lorenz system that famous butterfly-shaped chaos: ẋ = σ(y - x) ẏ = x(ρ - z) - y ż = xy - βz But here, we went one layer deeper. At every point (x, y, z), we computed the local Jacobian matrix, J(x, y, z) = [ -σ σ 0 ] [ ρ - z -1 - x ] [ y x - β ] Then we found its eigenvalues λ and plotted them in the complex plane. Re(λ) tells us whether nearby motion is locally growing or decaying. Im(λ) tells us whether that local motion is rotating. That gives us the spectral flow of the Lorenz system and not the attractor itself, but the hidden local linear geometry driving its instability. When I saw that flow, it looked strangely cosmic with two mirrored swarms curling like particles trapped in a mathematical whirlpool. So I mapped that spectral flow onto our living fabric, not as Einstein Spacetime this time, but as a creative geometric stage for chaos itself. #LorenzSystem #ChaosTheory #DynamicalSystems #Eigenvalues #SpectralFlow #ComplexPlane #NonlinearDynamics #Mathematics #Physics

Mathelirium

22,460 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Branch-Point Loom Some equations do not draw curves but instead draw weave sheets. This scene comes from the algebraic curve y² = Δ(z,t), where Δ(z,t) = Πⱼ(z - βⱼ(t)). The moving points βⱼ are branch points. These are special places where two sheets of the curve touch and swap identities. In the animation, those branch points appear as glowing mineral spindles moving across a dark surface. The landscape is shaped by -log|Δ(z,t)|. Therefore, the branch points rise into sharp seams while the surrounding surface folds around them. The bright threads follow the horizontal trajectories of the quadratic differential Δ(z,t)dz². #Mathematics #ComplexAnalysis #AlgebraicGeometry #MathArt #MathematicalArt #Geometry #PhysicsVisualization #STEM #Art

The Branch-Point Loom Some equations do not draw curves but instead draw weave sheets. This scene comes from the algebraic curve y² = Δ(z,t), where Δ(z,t) = Πⱼ(z - βⱼ(t)). The moving points βⱼ are branch points. These are special places where two sheets of the curve touch and swap identities. In the animation, those branch points appear as glowing mineral spindles moving across a dark surface. The landscape is shaped by -log|Δ(z,t)|. Therefore, the branch points rise into sharp seams while the surrounding surface folds around them. The bright threads follow the horizontal trajectories of the quadratic differential Δ(z,t)dz². #Mathematics #ComplexAnalysis #AlgebraicGeometry #MathArt #MathematicalArt #Geometry #PhysicsVisualization #STEM #Art

Mathelirium

15,287 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The single most undervalued fact of linear algebra: matrices are graphs, and graphs are matrices. Encoding matrices as graphs is a cheat code, making complex behavior simple to study. Let me show you how!

The single most undervalued fact of linear algebra: matrices are graphs, and graphs are matrices. Encoding matrices as graphs is a cheat code, making complex behavior simple to study. Let me show you how!

Tivadar Danka

158,849 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“IS THAT A GLITCH IN THE MATRIX?” “WHAT’S HAPPENING??” Two pilots are in absolute disbelief as they watch a massive military plane hanging completely still in the middle of the sky. How is this even possible?

“IS THAT A GLITCH IN THE MATRIX?” “WHAT’S HAPPENING??” Two pilots are in absolute disbelief as they watch a massive military plane hanging completely still in the middle of the sky. How is this even possible?

HustleBitch

1,769,004 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The Torus Becomes the Canvas A Jacobi Theta Function lives naturally on a complex torus. Instead of drawing it on a flat plane, we wrapped the mathematics onto the torus. The surface is driven by θ₁(z|τ), with its moving zeros, phase winding, and logarithmic derivative shaping the colour, seams, and raised divisor points across the geometry. What you are see is a periodic quantum-like field painted onto the space where it actually belongs. #JacobiTheta #ComplexTorus #MathematicalArt #ComplexAnalysis #RiemannSurfaces #MathAnimation

The Torus Becomes the Canvas A Jacobi Theta Function lives naturally on a complex torus. Instead of drawing it on a flat plane, we wrapped the mathematics onto the torus. The surface is driven by θ₁(z|τ), with its moving zeros, phase winding, and logarithmic derivative shaping the colour, seams, and raised divisor points across the geometry. What you are see is a periodic quantum-like field painted onto the space where it actually belongs. #JacobiTheta #ComplexTorus #MathematicalArt #ComplexAnalysis #RiemannSurfaces #MathAnimation

Mathelirium

22,197 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Three days ago, the Tate brothers criticised Israel for their disgusting crimes and exposed the Matrix is controlled by Jews. 🚨“THEY control the Matrix!“ This morning, DIICOT raided their home in a new investigation. This is not a coincidence, this is a planned Matrix attack.

Three days ago, the Tate brothers criticised Israel for their disgusting crimes and exposed the Matrix is controlled by Jews. 🚨“THEY control the Matrix!“ This morning, DIICOT raided their home in a new investigation. This is not a coincidence, this is a planned Matrix attack.

The Idea

35,378 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨🇺🇸ELON: WE’RE REPROGRAMMING THE MATRIX "We’re reprogramming the matrix. Success was never one of the possible outcomes—it was a Kobayashi Maru situation. If you're in the matrix, success was never possible. The only way to achieve success is to reprogram the matrix so that success becomes one of the possible outcomes. That’s what we’re doing." Source: The Joe Rogan Experience, February 28, 2025

🚨🇺🇸ELON: WE’RE REPROGRAMMING THE MATRIX "We’re reprogramming the matrix. Success was never one of the possible outcomes—it was a Kobayashi Maru situation. If you're in the matrix, success was never possible. The only way to achieve success is to reprogram the matrix so that success becomes one of the possible outcomes. That’s what we’re doing." Source: The Joe Rogan Experience, February 28, 2025

Mario Nawfal

684,949 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jason Segel revealed that he made a huge glass pipe that he and Seth Rogen used for smoking weed. Jason Segel: All we kind of knew is that you and I both liked to smoke weed. Seth Rogen: Yes, and a side note to The Matrix coming out is this Bill Pope, who's the cinematographer of The Matrix, was shooting our pilot. And the whole marketing campaign for The Matrix was "What is The Matrix?" and we'd always go to Bill and be like, "What is The Matrix?" And he wouldn’t tell us! But it actually came out the day the pilot wrapped. Jason Segel: Holy shit. Seth Rogen: So the whole, in my head, the whole pilot was just a march to The Matrix being released. Jason Segel: 100%! And then we rolled giant joints... Seth Rogen: Yeah. Jason Segel: ...and we drove to the movie theater, and we saw The Matrix together. Seth Rogen: We actually smoked weed out of a giant glass pipe that you had in your car! Like a huge, like a comically large, like dragon-shaped glass pipe. Jason Segel: I think I made that pipe because I had graduated high school with the assumption that you just start doing professional acting.

Jason Segel revealed that he made a huge glass pipe that he and Seth Rogen used for smoking weed. Jason Segel: All we kind of knew is that you and I both liked to smoke weed. Seth Rogen: Yes, and a side note to The Matrix coming out is this Bill Pope, who's the cinematographer of The Matrix, was shooting our pilot. And the whole marketing campaign for The Matrix was "What is The Matrix?" and we'd always go to Bill and be like, "What is The Matrix?" And he wouldn’t tell us! But it actually came out the day the pilot wrapped. Jason Segel: Holy shit. Seth Rogen: So the whole, in my head, the whole pilot was just a march to The Matrix being released. Jason Segel: 100%! And then we rolled giant joints... Seth Rogen: Yeah. Jason Segel: ...and we drove to the movie theater, and we saw The Matrix together. Seth Rogen: We actually smoked weed out of a giant glass pipe that you had in your car! Like a huge, like a comically large, like dragon-shaped glass pipe. Jason Segel: I think I made that pipe because I had graduated high school with the assumption that you just start doing professional acting.

Ruzy.hl

465,236 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

In The Matrix, it becomes obvious it’s a simulation when the black cat appears twice. World models fail similarly: visually the generated simulation looks realistic, but the underlying distribution is wrong. Introducing CaliBench, a measurement of the randomness of reality!

In The Matrix, it becomes obvious it’s a simulation when the black cat appears twice. World models fail similarly: visually the generated simulation looks realistic, but the underlying distribution is wrong. Introducing CaliBench, a measurement of the randomness of reality!

Oliver Cameron

113,910 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

THE MATRIX SPOON BOY'S MESSAGE Many have seen the Matrix but it seems fewer grasp just how powerful the 'spoon boy's' message was when Neo first visits the oracle... The boy says to Neo: "Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself." What he's saying is there is nothing that is NOT yourself, BECAUSE 'Neo' was not just an entity as the body, 'Neo' was the entire Matrix becoming self aware to re-write and change itself - this is why in the final movie there is rain and in the very end there is sunshine. Anyone who knows the Matrix knows EVERYTHING which appears is really shaped through Matrix code which means 'Neo' (who could visibly see this code) was all of the characters and places, not just the one we saw in the flesh as 'Neo'. Why do you think in the end Mr Smith asks Neo if he realises its impossible to win, that he simply can't.... And the reason nothing can be 'won' is they are not separate and Neo began realising himself as 'The Matrix' itself rather than just a body which is why he no longer fights Smith and allows him to enter his body.... The body was not 'Neo'.... 'Neo' becoming the chosen one is acknowledging the self as the entire Matrix, as one self and not two...(Mr. Anderson and Smith) There is no body which is separate from earth, only MIND has made this concept. Earth and body are ONE beyond what we call them... We are not Mr Anderson nor Neo, we are the entire Matrix writing itself to experience itself. Realise everything in the form which changes is only yourself because the self is not just limited to this body... Each and everyone of you are this 'CHOSEN ONE'. But what did Morpheus say to Neo... "DON'T THINK YOU ARE, KNOW YOU ARE"..... Until The One believes... They remain as just a character feeling stuck inside of something or somewhere when there is no where or place separate from your true self - which is why in the beginning it says: "The Matrix Has You..." In the beginning he existed as an illusory identity of Mr Anderson, the Matrix had him but he did not have the Matrix. He was not aware of the self beyond identity and form so through meeting Morpheus, "he died" and realised himself as the "chosen one" who can directly change and save his experience. What this means is ANYONE of these characters could of became 'Neo' because Neo is a realisation of the true self similar to "Christ Consciousness" as we know it... We are ALL this chosen one but until this is realised, we will never find it but seek it.... You do not become it, you ARE already IT... Any process is like running past the finish line after you've won a race, if you continue running, when do you acknowledge you've already finished... ✨🙌🏾💫 © Awakened Gnostic

THE MATRIX SPOON BOY'S MESSAGE Many have seen the Matrix but it seems fewer grasp just how powerful the 'spoon boy's' message was when Neo first visits the oracle... The boy says to Neo: "Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself." What he's saying is there is nothing that is NOT yourself, BECAUSE 'Neo' was not just an entity as the body, 'Neo' was the entire Matrix becoming self aware to re-write and change itself - this is why in the final movie there is rain and in the very end there is sunshine. Anyone who knows the Matrix knows EVERYTHING which appears is really shaped through Matrix code which means 'Neo' (who could visibly see this code) was all of the characters and places, not just the one we saw in the flesh as 'Neo'. Why do you think in the end Mr Smith asks Neo if he realises its impossible to win, that he simply can't.... And the reason nothing can be 'won' is they are not separate and Neo began realising himself as 'The Matrix' itself rather than just a body which is why he no longer fights Smith and allows him to enter his body.... The body was not 'Neo'.... 'Neo' becoming the chosen one is acknowledging the self as the entire Matrix, as one self and not two...(Mr. Anderson and Smith) There is no body which is separate from earth, only MIND has made this concept. Earth and body are ONE beyond what we call them... We are not Mr Anderson nor Neo, we are the entire Matrix writing itself to experience itself. Realise everything in the form which changes is only yourself because the self is not just limited to this body... Each and everyone of you are this 'CHOSEN ONE'. But what did Morpheus say to Neo... "DON'T THINK YOU ARE, KNOW YOU ARE"..... Until The One believes... They remain as just a character feeling stuck inside of something or somewhere when there is no where or place separate from your true self - which is why in the beginning it says: "The Matrix Has You..." In the beginning he existed as an illusory identity of Mr Anderson, the Matrix had him but he did not have the Matrix. He was not aware of the self beyond identity and form so through meeting Morpheus, "he died" and realised himself as the "chosen one" who can directly change and save his experience. What this means is ANYONE of these characters could of became 'Neo' because Neo is a realisation of the true self similar to "Christ Consciousness" as we know it... We are ALL this chosen one but until this is realised, we will never find it but seek it.... You do not become it, you ARE already IT... Any process is like running past the finish line after you've won a race, if you continue running, when do you acknowledge you've already finished... ✨🙌🏾💫 © Awakened Gnostic

🧬Maxpein🧬

129,688 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A Princeton probabilist explains why enormous random matrices stop behaving randomly and start behaving like a single fixed object. Almost nobody watches it. This is Ramon van Handel at Harvard's Science Center, April 2025, on the strong convergence phenomenon. Every weight matrix in every model starts as random numbers. The claim here is that as dimensions grow, the extreme behavior of such matrices, the largest eigenvalues, the operator norm, stops fluctuating and locks onto a deterministic limit. That is why initialization works at all. Why spectral norms are predictable. Why large networks behave more consistently than small ones instead of less. Watch how he sets up what strong means. The distinction between convergence of averages and convergence of the extremes carries the entire result. A machine learning engineer I know rewatched the setup twice and said scaling laws stopped feeling like empirical luck. Free on YouTube from the Harvard Mathematics Department, subtitles on. Random at small scale. Deterministic at large. Nobody told the engineers.

A Princeton probabilist explains why enormous random matrices stop behaving randomly and start behaving like a single fixed object. Almost nobody watches it. This is Ramon van Handel at Harvard's Science Center, April 2025, on the strong convergence phenomenon. Every weight matrix in every model starts as random numbers. The claim here is that as dimensions grow, the extreme behavior of such matrices, the largest eigenvalues, the operator norm, stops fluctuating and locks onto a deterministic limit. That is why initialization works at all. Why spectral norms are predictable. Why large networks behave more consistently than small ones instead of less. Watch how he sets up what strong means. The distinction between convergence of averages and convergence of the extremes carries the entire result. A machine learning engineer I know rewatched the setup twice and said scaling laws stopped feeling like empirical luck. Free on YouTube from the Harvard Mathematics Department, subtitles on. Random at small scale. Deterministic at large. Nobody told the engineers.

Mark Poiler

103,376 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THE MATRIX SPOON BOY'S MESSAGE Many have seen the Matrix but it seems fewer grasp just how powerful the 'spoon boy's' message was when Neo first visits the oracle... The boy says to Neo: "Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself." What he's saying is there is nothing that is NOT yourself, BECAUSE 'Neo' was not just an entity as the body, 'Neo' was the entire Matrix becoming self aware to re-write and change itself - this is why in the final movie there is rain and in the very end there is sunshine. Anyone who knows the Matrix knows EVERYTHING which appears is really shaped through Matrix code which means 'Neo' (who could visibly see this code) was all of the characters and places, not just the one we saw in the flesh as 'Neo'. Why do you think in the end Mr Smith asks Neo if he realises its impossible to win, that he simply can't.... And the reason nothing can be 'won' is they are not separate and Neo began realising himself as 'The Matrix' itself rather than just a body which is why he no longer fights Smith and allows him to enter his body.... The body was not 'Neo'.... 'Neo' becoming the chosen one is acknowledging the self as the entire Matrix, as one self and not two...(Mr. Anderson and Smith) There is no body which is separate from earth, only MIND has made this concept. Earth and body are ONE beyond what we call them... We are not Mr Anderson nor Neo, we are the entire Matrix writing itself to experience itself. Realise everything in the form which changes is only yourself because the self is not just limited to this body... Each and everyone of you are this 'CHOSEN ONE'. But what did Morpheus say to Neo... "DON'T THINK YOU ARE, KNOW YOU ARE"..... Until The One believes... They remain as just a character feeling stuck inside of something or somewhere when there is no where or place separate from your true self - which is why in the beginning it says: "The Matrix Has You..." In the beginning he existed as an illusory identity of Mr Anderson, the Matrix had him but he did not have the Matrix. He was not aware of the self beyond identity and form so through meeting Morpheus, "he died" and realised himself as the "chosen one" who can directly change and save his experience. What this means is ANYONE of these characters could of became 'Neo' because Neo is a realisation of the true self similar to "Christ Consciousness" as we know it... We are ALL this chosen one but until this is realised, we will never find it but seek it.... You do not become it, you ARE already IT... Any process is like running past the finish line after you've won a race, if you continue running, when do you acknowledge you've already finished... ✨🙌🏾💫 © Awakened Gnostic

THE MATRIX SPOON BOY'S MESSAGE Many have seen the Matrix but it seems fewer grasp just how powerful the 'spoon boy's' message was when Neo first visits the oracle... The boy says to Neo: "Do not try and bend the spoon, that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth...there is no spoon. Then you'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself." What he's saying is there is nothing that is NOT yourself, BECAUSE 'Neo' was not just an entity as the body, 'Neo' was the entire Matrix becoming self aware to re-write and change itself - this is why in the final movie there is rain and in the very end there is sunshine. Anyone who knows the Matrix knows EVERYTHING which appears is really shaped through Matrix code which means 'Neo' (who could visibly see this code) was all of the characters and places, not just the one we saw in the flesh as 'Neo'. Why do you think in the end Mr Smith asks Neo if he realises its impossible to win, that he simply can't.... And the reason nothing can be 'won' is they are not separate and Neo began realising himself as 'The Matrix' itself rather than just a body which is why he no longer fights Smith and allows him to enter his body.... The body was not 'Neo'.... 'Neo' becoming the chosen one is acknowledging the self as the entire Matrix, as one self and not two...(Mr. Anderson and Smith) There is no body which is separate from earth, only MIND has made this concept. Earth and body are ONE beyond what we call them... We are not Mr Anderson nor Neo, we are the entire Matrix writing itself to experience itself. Realise everything in the form which changes is only yourself because the self is not just limited to this body... Each and everyone of you are this 'CHOSEN ONE'. But what did Morpheus say to Neo... "DON'T THINK YOU ARE, KNOW YOU ARE"..... Until The One believes... They remain as just a character feeling stuck inside of something or somewhere when there is no where or place separate from your true self - which is why in the beginning it says: "The Matrix Has You..." In the beginning he existed as an illusory identity of Mr Anderson, the Matrix had him but he did not have the Matrix. He was not aware of the self beyond identity and form so through meeting Morpheus, "he died" and realised himself as the "chosen one" who can directly change and save his experience. What this means is ANYONE of these characters could of became 'Neo' because Neo is a realisation of the true self similar to "Christ Consciousness" as we know it... We are ALL this chosen one but until this is realised, we will never find it but seek it.... You do not become it, you ARE already IT... Any process is like running past the finish line after you've won a race, if you continue running, when do you acknowledge you've already finished... ✨🙌🏾💫 © Awakened Gnostic

🧬Maxpein🧬

59,563 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🤯 IN 1983 — 16 YEARS BEFORE THE MATRIX — THE CIA OFFICIALLY PROVED THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION This is Figure B from the declassified CIA Gateway Experience report (1983). It shows the “Cosmic Egg”: • A Black Hole and White Hole connected at the center • The Nucleus is a Hologram • Reality is not solid matter… it’s a vibrating energy field The report states that the universe is an incredibly complex hologram. And more importantly — Page 25 (hidden for decades) explains exactly how human consciousness can control and reshape this simulation through a process called “Patterning”. They knew the truth 16 years before Hollywood told us in The Matrix. The answers have always been inside. Are you ready to see what they tried to hide for 40 years? IN 1983, THE CIA OFFICIALLY DOCUMENTED THAT THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION. THIS HAPPENED 16 YEARS BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE MATRIX. PAGE 25, WHICH EXPLAINS HOW TO CONTROL IT, WAS HIDDEN FOR DECADES. THE ANSWERS ARE INSIDE.

🤯 IN 1983 — 16 YEARS BEFORE THE MATRIX — THE CIA OFFICIALLY PROVED THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION This is Figure B from the declassified CIA Gateway Experience report (1983). It shows the “Cosmic Egg”: • A Black Hole and White Hole connected at the center • The Nucleus is a Hologram • Reality is not solid matter… it’s a vibrating energy field The report states that the universe is an incredibly complex hologram. And more importantly — Page 25 (hidden for decades) explains exactly how human consciousness can control and reshape this simulation through a process called “Patterning”. They knew the truth 16 years before Hollywood told us in The Matrix. The answers have always been inside. Are you ready to see what they tried to hide for 40 years? IN 1983, THE CIA OFFICIALLY DOCUMENTED THAT THE UNIVERSE IS A SIMULATION. THIS HAPPENED 16 YEARS BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE MATRIX. PAGE 25, WHICH EXPLAINS HOW TO CONTROL IT, WAS HIDDEN FOR DECADES. THE ANSWERS ARE INSIDE.

Philippe T

12,839 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A 91-year-old professor is why Nvidia is worth $4 trillion. His name is Gilbert Strang. He teaches linear algebra at MIT. Every AI model on Earth runs on his course. The course has been free on YouTube since 2005. The videos have earned him nothing. MIT 18.06 opens with "The Geometry of Linear Equations." No advanced math. Strang takes a system of two equations, draws it two ways, and shows the class that a matrix is a picture, not an abstraction. The row picture is two lines that cross. The column picture is two arrows that sum to a target. Every neural network on Earth operates on the column picture. Strang first taught linear algebra at MIT in 1962. He wrote the textbook in 1976. It is on every serious engineer's shelf. Every quant fund, every ML lab, every rendering engine at Pixar is running his math. His central insight is that most people are taught matrices as bookkeeping. That is the first thing to unlearn. A matrix is a linear transformation. A linear transformation is a way of moving space. Once you see the space move, the math stops being algebra and becomes geometry. The Kalman filter is a linear system. PCA is a linear system. Every gradient step in a neural net is a matrix-vector product. GPT is a stack of matrix-vector products, each one a scene from MIT 18.06 running on a Blackwell GPU. He retired in 2023 after 61 years at MIT. The course is still up. Watched tens of millions of times. The chip is $40,000. Strang never asked for a royalty.

A 91-year-old professor is why Nvidia is worth $4 trillion. His name is Gilbert Strang. He teaches linear algebra at MIT. Every AI model on Earth runs on his course. The course has been free on YouTube since 2005. The videos have earned him nothing. MIT 18.06 opens with "The Geometry of Linear Equations." No advanced math. Strang takes a system of two equations, draws it two ways, and shows the class that a matrix is a picture, not an abstraction. The row picture is two lines that cross. The column picture is two arrows that sum to a target. Every neural network on Earth operates on the column picture. Strang first taught linear algebra at MIT in 1962. He wrote the textbook in 1976. It is on every serious engineer's shelf. Every quant fund, every ML lab, every rendering engine at Pixar is running his math. His central insight is that most people are taught matrices as bookkeeping. That is the first thing to unlearn. A matrix is a linear transformation. A linear transformation is a way of moving space. Once you see the space move, the math stops being algebra and becomes geometry. The Kalman filter is a linear system. PCA is a linear system. Every gradient step in a neural net is a matrix-vector product. GPT is a stack of matrix-vector products, each one a scene from MIT 18.06 running on a Blackwell GPU. He retired in 2023 after 61 years at MIT. The course is still up. Watched tens of millions of times. The chip is $40,000. Strang never asked for a royalty.

Ochob

128,950 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"I envy you. But such a thing is not meant to last." Monica Bellucci completely stole this scene. The Matrix Reloaded gave us some of the most intense and dramatic character dynamics of the 2000s.

"I envy you. But such a thing is not meant to last." Monica Bellucci completely stole this scene. The Matrix Reloaded gave us some of the most intense and dramatic character dynamics of the 2000s.

MOVIE BOX 🗃️ 🎥

111,174 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Gilbert Strang, the legendary mathematician who taught linear algebra for 61 years and became the most watched math professor in history: "I used to think a matrix was just a grid of numbers, until I proved that its rows and columns always agree on one number no matter how you look at them. That fact still feels like magic to me after sixty years." this is the exact proof sitting quietly underneath every factor model a risk desk trusts with real capital, and almost nobody outside a math department has ever seen it. strip away the notation and the idea is almost absurdly simple. take any matrix, any grid of numbers, and count how many of its rows are truly independent, meaning none of them can be built out of the others. now count the independent columns instead, a completely different question on the surface. those two numbers, row independence and column independence, always turn out exactly equal, no matter how large or lopsided the matrix is. nobody presenting a clean risk model out loud credits a decades old proof for the reason the math even holds together. zoom out to what this means for anything built on a grid of numbers today. a portfolio, a covariance matrix, a neural network's weights, all of them hide a true dimension smaller than their size suggests, and that hidden number is exactly what this proof pins down. the industry sells complexity as scale, more assets, more parameters, more rows and columns. but the real question was never how big the matrix is. it's how many independent directions are actually hiding inside it. the size of the grid was never the real story. it was the one number both sides of it were quietly agreeing on the whole time.

Gilbert Strang, the legendary mathematician who taught linear algebra for 61 years and became the most watched math professor in history: "I used to think a matrix was just a grid of numbers, until I proved that its rows and columns always agree on one number no matter how you look at them. That fact still feels like magic to me after sixty years." this is the exact proof sitting quietly underneath every factor model a risk desk trusts with real capital, and almost nobody outside a math department has ever seen it. strip away the notation and the idea is almost absurdly simple. take any matrix, any grid of numbers, and count how many of its rows are truly independent, meaning none of them can be built out of the others. now count the independent columns instead, a completely different question on the surface. those two numbers, row independence and column independence, always turn out exactly equal, no matter how large or lopsided the matrix is. nobody presenting a clean risk model out loud credits a decades old proof for the reason the math even holds together. zoom out to what this means for anything built on a grid of numbers today. a portfolio, a covariance matrix, a neural network's weights, all of them hide a true dimension smaller than their size suggests, and that hidden number is exactly what this proof pins down. the industry sells complexity as scale, more assets, more parameters, more rows and columns. but the real question was never how big the matrix is. it's how many independent directions are actually hiding inside it. the size of the grid was never the real story. it was the one number both sides of it were quietly agreeing on the whole time.

MindArch

18,494 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen