Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Putting Electrobound through dog conversion processing. 5 estim boxes ripping through it's body whilst the machine mercilessly extracts any fluids until it's brain is mush and replaced with sweet puppy thoughts. WOOF! 🔝 Dog Stricken Ⓐstray 🔜 MRM Juno (Bark Gimpson) 🔜 🤷

DogStricken's profile picture

Dog Stricken

20,191 subscribers

99,140 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

RubberNorthLadUK 🔜 Darklands 2025's profile picture
RubberNorthLadUK 🔜 Darklands 20251 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic Oh wow 🥵🥵🤤🤤😈😈

Wanderingbiker aka Pup Fire's profile picture
Wanderingbiker aka Pup Fire1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic Talk about sensory overload ! Bliss !

Bondageduo2 🔜Berlin Easter's profile picture
Bondageduo2 🔜Berlin Easter1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic Absolutely incredible 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

boybondage's profile picture
boybondage1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic Oh gosh to be able to experience this 🥵

Ranger 🔜 ANE 🔜 Calif- SFO & PSP's profile picture
Ranger 🔜 ANE 🔜 Calif- SFO & PSP1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic How can I sign up for this conversion process? 🥹👉🏻👈🏻

bondage_paris soon at Amsterdam's profile picture
bondage_paris soon at Amsterdam1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic Woof 🐶

latexmichael's profile picture
latexmichael1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic Es muss echt unbeschreiblich sein in diesem faszinierendem Vakuumanzug zu strecken, dazu viele E-Toys am Körper haben sowie die Maschine ständig den Saft aus einem rausholt. Dazu komplett streng fixiert das ein Zappen fast nicht möglich ist. Da wird es warm ums Herz. Respekt🥰😍

ScotRubberTwunk's profile picture
ScotRubberTwunk1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic Amazing 🥵🥵😈

Pup Reco 🔜 KKAD/ALERT and ANIMALZ's profile picture
Pup Reco 🔜 KKAD/ALERT and ANIMALZ1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic fuuk damn that's hot 👅👅😈

Rubbergimpdrone's profile picture
Rubbergimpdrone1 year ago

@electrobound @AstrayPup @Rubberfanatic Wow! So much going on that looks amazing!

Related Videos

6 estim boxes pounding away creating forced body convulsions whilst getting lost in the spirals 🔝 Juno (Bark Gimpson) 🔜 🤷
2:20

Sensitive content

6 estim boxes pounding away creating forced body convulsions whilst getting lost in the spirals 🔝 Juno (Bark Gimpson) 🔜 🤷

Dog Stricken

32,988 views • 3 years ago

First of all, the one doing the interview is just too much for me. She puts out so much misinformation it's unreal. She is a so-called lawyer and she lies and has the craziest opinions about this entire case, and other cases. I can't even stand to hear her speak for 5 mins but who in the actual fuck is out here telling Kerry Roberts that doing interviews is a good idea?? She doesn't even understand the facts of the case and she's talking about it like WE'RE the "dumb ones".😂😂 No Kerry, no one believes John O'Keefe went in the house with the glass, was in a fight, mauled by a dog, and then was put outside to THEN "drop the cocktail glass." YOU FUCKING MORON! I guess she believes that it's not possible for a glass, THAT DIDN'T EVEN MATCH ANY OF THE OTHER GLASS FOUND, to be put outside by the McAlbert's, after John was killed, to get rid of the evidence! I guess she also believes that a magic hair just stayed on the bumper through a blizzard, traveling from place to place?? Bro, I just can't with these people whatsoever. Kerry thinks everyone is dumb but she's the smartest one in the room. I agree with TB, she should have to watch this video by Bobby Sauce Bobby Sauce over and over.😂😂It's hilarious, but besides being hilarious, it's so true! In order to believe Karen Read hit John O'Keefe, you have to believe all these other facts. It's just insane. These people act like the public are just blind and dumb. Like no one watched 2 trials with these people lying and manipulating, and weren't capable of forming their OWN OPINIONS about them. It's not illegal to form an opinion after watching a trial. Its just not. The WORLD believes in Karen Read's innocence, TOUGH SHIT. #FreeTurtleboy #KarenRead #FKR #KerryRoberts
3:19

First of all, the one doing the interview is just too much for me. She puts out so much misinformation it's unreal. She is a so-called lawyer and she lies and has the craziest opinions about this entire case, and other cases. I can't even stand to hear her speak for 5 mins but who in the actual fuck is out here telling Kerry Roberts that doing interviews is a good idea?? She doesn't even understand the facts of the case and she's talking about it like WE'RE the "dumb ones".😂😂 No Kerry, no one believes John O'Keefe went in the house with the glass, was in a fight, mauled by a dog, and then was put outside to THEN "drop the cocktail glass." YOU FUCKING MORON! I guess she believes that it's not possible for a glass, THAT DIDN'T EVEN MATCH ANY OF THE OTHER GLASS FOUND, to be put outside by the McAlbert's, after John was killed, to get rid of the evidence! I guess she also believes that a magic hair just stayed on the bumper through a blizzard, traveling from place to place?? Bro, I just can't with these people whatsoever. Kerry thinks everyone is dumb but she's the smartest one in the room. I agree with TB, she should have to watch this video by Bobby Sauce Bobby Sauce over and over.😂😂It's hilarious, but besides being hilarious, it's so true! In order to believe Karen Read hit John O'Keefe, you have to believe all these other facts. It's just insane. These people act like the public are just blind and dumb. Like no one watched 2 trials with these people lying and manipulating, and weren't capable of forming their OWN OPINIONS about them. It's not illegal to form an opinion after watching a trial. Its just not. The WORLD believes in Karen Read's innocence, TOUGH SHIT. #FreeTurtleboy #KarenRead #FKR #KerryRoberts

That Girl T

15,104 views • 3 months ago

Sometimes when we rescue dogs, it really is a life-or-death situation and that's very much the case for this tiny little girl who got reported to us yesterday. At first locals and the authorities told us that she had been poisoned so it was her race to empty her stomach and try and keep her alive. The team had been battling for the last 24 hours and it was very much touch and go. Today we've seen some amazing progress and her first tail wag! She's been undergoing a series of tests to eliminate any possible poisons and she's also been analyzed on her brain. Whatever happened, this dog has definitely had a massive trauma but she seems to be just about through the worst of it. It's way too early for her to regain use of her limbs yet but it was good to see that she was able to lift her head today at least. This is very much a dog who wants to live and wants to get better but her body just won't let her yet. There is so much fight left in her though. I called her Espresso because she looked dark with a little hint of coffee on her and then I thought I'd give her her full name of Espresso Martini 🍸 ☕️ I would say her road to recovery will take weeks but the medical team are hopeful after her first 24 hours of progress that there might just be a future for this beautiful little girl ❤️🤞
1:25

Sometimes when we rescue dogs, it really is a life-or-death situation and that's very much the case for this tiny little girl who got reported to us yesterday. At first locals and the authorities told us that she had been poisoned so it was her race to empty her stomach and try and keep her alive. The team had been battling for the last 24 hours and it was very much touch and go. Today we've seen some amazing progress and her first tail wag! She's been undergoing a series of tests to eliminate any possible poisons and she's also been analyzed on her brain. Whatever happened, this dog has definitely had a massive trauma but she seems to be just about through the worst of it. It's way too early for her to regain use of her limbs yet but it was good to see that she was able to lift her head today at least. This is very much a dog who wants to live and wants to get better but her body just won't let her yet. There is so much fight left in her though. I called her Espresso because she looked dark with a little hint of coffee on her and then I thought I'd give her her full name of Espresso Martini 🍸 ☕️ I would say her road to recovery will take weeks but the medical team are hopeful after her first 24 hours of progress that there might just be a future for this beautiful little girl ❤️🤞

Niall Harbison

219,781 views • 1 month ago

PALANTIR'S MILITARY A.I. & NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS adaptation. This is the most important aspect of the A.I. conversation and adaption of Palantir and the weapons associated with it that nobody is talking about. Beside the secret contracts with Palantir and the CIA, the use of direct energy weapons, A.I., facial recognition, and civilian databases have been in use for years. Even Rite-Aid was using advanced A.I. facial recognition technology in their stores over 5 years ago. All of this already exists. They already know everything about you and so does big tech. This is what everyone is talking about but it doesn't matter at all. That ship has sailed 20+ years ago. You need to get past this aspect and understand that we are way farther ahead, technologically speaking, then you could have ever imagined. I will briefly give you an introduction and example. I suggest you start researching these things and technologies on your own. What they're not talking about is the adaption of other technology and neurological weapons that are both lethal and non-lethal that can be integrated with these global surveillance systems and networks that takes this to a whole other level and completely turns this into a wireless biological monitorization and neurological/biological control weapon of a select target/s anywhere in the world. For example, imagine using earbuds that read your brainwaves in real time, which is your thoughts, then by using this global monitoring system with the most advanced A.I., these A.I. scripts are then running in real time and decoding those brainwaves, building a profile on your specific brainwaves and learning and teaching itself at the same time. Now what you're thinking and everywhere you go they will know specific things you are thinking. It get's worse. They already have electrodes made from nanotechnology that can enter your body in multiple ways through the air, your food, or vaccines, which can then enter the brain through the blood-brain barrier, and plant themselves in your head which then give the capability not only to send information but to also receive information or pulses to stimulate the brain and other biological components. Ladies and gentleman the type of tech that is available can also control and induce emotions and behaviors or you nervous system, which in turn, controls you. DARPA has already successfully created biological drones with full control of their nervous system. This is where BMI (Brain Machine Interface) comes into play and the capabilities are endless. We haven't even entered the aspect of using light, electromagnetic radiation, radio or extremely low frequency or pulses, or acoustic waves either which are also able to send and receive signals to and from the brain to monitor or write/command to the brain in real time. This also goes for other parts of the body, like being able to induce heart problems, etc. You need to start thinking bigger because 99% of the population is stuck and worried about the government having a database on them, which is beyond laughable because they have multiple databases on everyone. Your phone alone gives them everything they need to know about you already with a camera and microphone. That is not the issue. It's physical and literal control and invasion of your thoughts, behaviors, emotions, literal functions, completely remotely, anywhere in the world. This isn't something to be worried about down the road. It's already here. You need to learn what's really going on and the real agenda and capabilities behind this technology. There's a reason the mainstream barley talks about this. You need to understand how it works and the difference incase you are ever targeted. I can confirm that reality is far stranger and more fascinating than any fiction. You've been warned.
11:18

PALANTIR'S MILITARY A.I. & NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS adaptation. This is the most important aspect of the A.I. conversation and adaption of Palantir and the weapons associated with it that nobody is talking about. Beside the secret contracts with Palantir and the CIA, the use of direct energy weapons, A.I., facial recognition, and civilian databases have been in use for years. Even Rite-Aid was using advanced A.I. facial recognition technology in their stores over 5 years ago. All of this already exists. They already know everything about you and so does big tech. This is what everyone is talking about but it doesn't matter at all. That ship has sailed 20+ years ago. You need to get past this aspect and understand that we are way farther ahead, technologically speaking, then you could have ever imagined. I will briefly give you an introduction and example. I suggest you start researching these things and technologies on your own. What they're not talking about is the adaption of other technology and neurological weapons that are both lethal and non-lethal that can be integrated with these global surveillance systems and networks that takes this to a whole other level and completely turns this into a wireless biological monitorization and neurological/biological control weapon of a select target/s anywhere in the world. For example, imagine using earbuds that read your brainwaves in real time, which is your thoughts, then by using this global monitoring system with the most advanced A.I., these A.I. scripts are then running in real time and decoding those brainwaves, building a profile on your specific brainwaves and learning and teaching itself at the same time. Now what you're thinking and everywhere you go they will know specific things you are thinking. It get's worse. They already have electrodes made from nanotechnology that can enter your body in multiple ways through the air, your food, or vaccines, which can then enter the brain through the blood-brain barrier, and plant themselves in your head which then give the capability not only to send information but to also receive information or pulses to stimulate the brain and other biological components. Ladies and gentleman the type of tech that is available can also control and induce emotions and behaviors or you nervous system, which in turn, controls you. DARPA has already successfully created biological drones with full control of their nervous system. This is where BMI (Brain Machine Interface) comes into play and the capabilities are endless. We haven't even entered the aspect of using light, electromagnetic radiation, radio or extremely low frequency or pulses, or acoustic waves either which are also able to send and receive signals to and from the brain to monitor or write/command to the brain in real time. This also goes for other parts of the body, like being able to induce heart problems, etc. You need to start thinking bigger because 99% of the population is stuck and worried about the government having a database on them, which is beyond laughable because they have multiple databases on everyone. Your phone alone gives them everything they need to know about you already with a camera and microphone. That is not the issue. It's physical and literal control and invasion of your thoughts, behaviors, emotions, literal functions, completely remotely, anywhere in the world. This isn't something to be worried about down the road. It's already here. You need to learn what's really going on and the real agenda and capabilities behind this technology. There's a reason the mainstream barley talks about this. You need to understand how it works and the difference incase you are ever targeted. I can confirm that reality is far stranger and more fascinating than any fiction. You've been warned.

The SCIF

56,970 views • 1 year ago

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE NANOTECHNOLOGY THROUGH mRNA VACCINES. Since Moderna called their mRNA jabs an "operating system" designed to program humans, people were confused and nervous. And they should be. The type of tech that these pharmaceutical companies are developing along with other leading companies like the Pentagon's DARPA and many other leading researchers and tech innovators with self-assembling and other types of nanotechnology, developing sensors, electrodes, and BMI devices to enter the body through mRNA vaccines and other methods to have control, monitor, induce behavior, emotions, functions, even read and write to the brain, etc., are literally terrifying. This isn't something that's coming within the next 5 to 10 years. It's already here. Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), as a cutting-edge technology, refers to the establishment of a direct communication channel between the brain and peripheral electronic devices to realize the efficient information exchange between people and machines. It in a narrow sense refers to the establishment between the brain and the external environment does not depend on the peripheral nerve and muscle new communication and control channel, by measuring and collecting the central nervous system activity, and its directly translated can be recognized by external artificial equipment signal or instruction, so as to realize the direct communication and control of the brain and external equipment. Generalized brain computer interface includes input BCI, output BCI and interactive BCI, the input BCI is by external equipment or machine to the brain input electrical, magnetic, acoustic and optical stimulation of brain-computer interface system, output BCI is the signal of the brain into the external equipment control instructions, interactive BCI is by feedback nerve output and input link connected to form a closed loop brain computer interface system. Nanotechnology plays a key role in the innovative applications of neuroscience and brain computer interfaces. By taking advantage of the unique properties of ministerial, such as high conductivity, biocompatibility and regulation, scientists are able to design more sophisticated and efficient brain-computer interface devices. These devices can not only realize the precise recording and stimulation of nerve signals, but also promote the repair and regeneration of nerve tissue, providing new tools and means for neuroscience research and clinical application. Therefore, the innovative application of self-assembling, biodegradable, graphene, etc., nanotechnology in the interface between neuroscience and brain computer technology is gradually promoting the rapid development of this field, providing infinite possibilities for humans to explore the mysteries of the brain and improve the neural function. Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) enable direct communication between the brain and external devices, but their performance heavily depends on the quality of the electrodes. Traditional materials, such as gold and platinum, offer high conductivity but often struggle with biocompatibility and can cause tissue damage due to their mechanical mismatch with neural tissue. While conductive polymers provide greater flexibility, they frequently fall short in electrical performance. Nanomaterials, including carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene, are increasingly considered promising alternatives. These materials combine high conductivity with mechanical flexibility and offer potential improvements in biocompatibility, enhancing the capture and transmission of neural signals. Hybrid materials, which integrate conductive polymers with nanomaterials, have also shown potential by balancing flexibility and signal quality. This review examines recent advancements in nanomaterial-based BCI electrodes and focuses on how these new materials address the limitations of traditional electrodes. It also discusses emerging tools like metallic nanoparticles and nanowires, along with the ongoing challenges of biocompatibility, tissue integration, and ethical considerations. As nanotechnology continues to evolve, it has the potential to significantly enhance the functionality and longevity of BCIs, making them more effective in facilitating neural communication. Nanotechnology, as the frontier field of the development of science and technology in the 21st century, is gradually penetrating into the research of neuroscience and brain-computer interface, injecting new vitality and possibilities into this interdisciplinary subject. With the deepening of human cognition of the brain, neuroscience and brain-computer interface technology has increasingly become a bridge connecting the biological world and the digital world, aiming to interpret the brain information and realize human-computer interaction through advanced technological means, and then promote the innovation of medical treatment, rehabilitation, intelligent control and other fields. The introduction of nanotechnology provides a different perspective and means to solve the technical problems in the field of neuroscience and brain-computer interface. Antimalarial, with their unique structural characteristics, excellent photoelectric properties and excellent mechanical properties, show great potential in the application of neural interfaces. In structure, the small size effect of ministerial enables them to combine more closely with nerve cells to reduce tissue damage during implantation. In terms of photoelectric properties, the high electrical conductivity and tunable optical properties of ministerial enable the accurate recording and stimulation of nerve signals. In mechanical properties, the toughness and elasticity of ministerial ensure their stability and reliability in the long-term implantation process. These improvements in properties not only significantly enhance the biocompatibility of neural interfaces and reduce the risk of immune response, but also greatly improve the transmission efficiency and accuracy of neural signals, laying a solid foundation for the further progress of neuroscience and brain-computer interface technology. The main nanomaterials in the brain-computer interface is classified according to the organic nanomaterials in the composition, such as carbon nanotubes, graphite and nanoseconds, play an important role in neuroscience and brain-computer interfaces with their superior biocompatibility, high conductivity and lightweight properties. They need to be able to enhance electrode flexibility, improve signal recording quality and stimulation efficiency. Semiconductor ministerial, such as organic electrochemical transistors, have excellent ionic and electron conduction properties and can serve as an interactive interface between biology and electronics to achieve highly sensitive signal detection. As a typical spongy and wet material, hydrogel is widely studied and used because of its unique mechanical properties, biocompatibility and ionic conductivity. It can provide a good carrier for a variety of inorganic ministerial and build composites with better performance. There are also magnetic antiparticle, quantum dots and up conversion antiparticle, which play an important role in advanced imaging technologies and can realize the visualization of specific pathological markers or cellular processes, contributing to the early diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases. Although these technologies are great for people with disabilities or illnesses, just like many other technologies, it's already being weaponized as developments are already in the process with innovations and numerous methods of control and the monetization of certain aspects throughout this technology. This is a government's dream weapon and privacy will cease to exists along with your own thoughts. This is the world that is sadly already here and in major development for our society. The part that should scare everyone is that this type of technology and nanomaterial is already in some mRNA vaccines, in our food supply, and being sprayed on us, animals, and our food from above. Sadly, how much they've been lying to us. Let's just say it wouldn't surprise me if a large amount of people around the globe have some kind of self-assembling, nanotechnology inside them already. Especially the people who took the jabs during covid. I suggest to really do your own research before considering taking any vaccines or shots in general. The writing is on the wall, complete control is the goal, and it's already here.
10:38

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE NANOTECHNOLOGY THROUGH mRNA VACCINES. Since Moderna called their mRNA jabs an "operating system" designed to program humans, people were confused and nervous. And they should be. The type of tech that these pharmaceutical companies are developing along with other leading companies like the Pentagon's DARPA and many other leading researchers and tech innovators with self-assembling and other types of nanotechnology, developing sensors, electrodes, and BMI devices to enter the body through mRNA vaccines and other methods to have control, monitor, induce behavior, emotions, functions, even read and write to the brain, etc., are literally terrifying. This isn't something that's coming within the next 5 to 10 years. It's already here. Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), as a cutting-edge technology, refers to the establishment of a direct communication channel between the brain and peripheral electronic devices to realize the efficient information exchange between people and machines. It in a narrow sense refers to the establishment between the brain and the external environment does not depend on the peripheral nerve and muscle new communication and control channel, by measuring and collecting the central nervous system activity, and its directly translated can be recognized by external artificial equipment signal or instruction, so as to realize the direct communication and control of the brain and external equipment. Generalized brain computer interface includes input BCI, output BCI and interactive BCI, the input BCI is by external equipment or machine to the brain input electrical, magnetic, acoustic and optical stimulation of brain-computer interface system, output BCI is the signal of the brain into the external equipment control instructions, interactive BCI is by feedback nerve output and input link connected to form a closed loop brain computer interface system. Nanotechnology plays a key role in the innovative applications of neuroscience and brain computer interfaces. By taking advantage of the unique properties of ministerial, such as high conductivity, biocompatibility and regulation, scientists are able to design more sophisticated and efficient brain-computer interface devices. These devices can not only realize the precise recording and stimulation of nerve signals, but also promote the repair and regeneration of nerve tissue, providing new tools and means for neuroscience research and clinical application. Therefore, the innovative application of self-assembling, biodegradable, graphene, etc., nanotechnology in the interface between neuroscience and brain computer technology is gradually promoting the rapid development of this field, providing infinite possibilities for humans to explore the mysteries of the brain and improve the neural function. Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) enable direct communication between the brain and external devices, but their performance heavily depends on the quality of the electrodes. Traditional materials, such as gold and platinum, offer high conductivity but often struggle with biocompatibility and can cause tissue damage due to their mechanical mismatch with neural tissue. While conductive polymers provide greater flexibility, they frequently fall short in electrical performance. Nanomaterials, including carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene, are increasingly considered promising alternatives. These materials combine high conductivity with mechanical flexibility and offer potential improvements in biocompatibility, enhancing the capture and transmission of neural signals. Hybrid materials, which integrate conductive polymers with nanomaterials, have also shown potential by balancing flexibility and signal quality. This review examines recent advancements in nanomaterial-based BCI electrodes and focuses on how these new materials address the limitations of traditional electrodes. It also discusses emerging tools like metallic nanoparticles and nanowires, along with the ongoing challenges of biocompatibility, tissue integration, and ethical considerations. As nanotechnology continues to evolve, it has the potential to significantly enhance the functionality and longevity of BCIs, making them more effective in facilitating neural communication. Nanotechnology, as the frontier field of the development of science and technology in the 21st century, is gradually penetrating into the research of neuroscience and brain-computer interface, injecting new vitality and possibilities into this interdisciplinary subject. With the deepening of human cognition of the brain, neuroscience and brain-computer interface technology has increasingly become a bridge connecting the biological world and the digital world, aiming to interpret the brain information and realize human-computer interaction through advanced technological means, and then promote the innovation of medical treatment, rehabilitation, intelligent control and other fields. The introduction of nanotechnology provides a different perspective and means to solve the technical problems in the field of neuroscience and brain-computer interface. Antimalarial, with their unique structural characteristics, excellent photoelectric properties and excellent mechanical properties, show great potential in the application of neural interfaces. In structure, the small size effect of ministerial enables them to combine more closely with nerve cells to reduce tissue damage during implantation. In terms of photoelectric properties, the high electrical conductivity and tunable optical properties of ministerial enable the accurate recording and stimulation of nerve signals. In mechanical properties, the toughness and elasticity of ministerial ensure their stability and reliability in the long-term implantation process. These improvements in properties not only significantly enhance the biocompatibility of neural interfaces and reduce the risk of immune response, but also greatly improve the transmission efficiency and accuracy of neural signals, laying a solid foundation for the further progress of neuroscience and brain-computer interface technology. The main nanomaterials in the brain-computer interface is classified according to the organic nanomaterials in the composition, such as carbon nanotubes, graphite and nanoseconds, play an important role in neuroscience and brain-computer interfaces with their superior biocompatibility, high conductivity and lightweight properties. They need to be able to enhance electrode flexibility, improve signal recording quality and stimulation efficiency. Semiconductor ministerial, such as organic electrochemical transistors, have excellent ionic and electron conduction properties and can serve as an interactive interface between biology and electronics to achieve highly sensitive signal detection. As a typical spongy and wet material, hydrogel is widely studied and used because of its unique mechanical properties, biocompatibility and ionic conductivity. It can provide a good carrier for a variety of inorganic ministerial and build composites with better performance. There are also magnetic antiparticle, quantum dots and up conversion antiparticle, which play an important role in advanced imaging technologies and can realize the visualization of specific pathological markers or cellular processes, contributing to the early diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases. Although these technologies are great for people with disabilities or illnesses, just like many other technologies, it's already being weaponized as developments are already in the process with innovations and numerous methods of control and the monetization of certain aspects throughout this technology. This is a government's dream weapon and privacy will cease to exists along with your own thoughts. This is the world that is sadly already here and in major development for our society. The part that should scare everyone is that this type of technology and nanomaterial is already in some mRNA vaccines, in our food supply, and being sprayed on us, animals, and our food from above. Sadly, how much they've been lying to us. Let's just say it wouldn't surprise me if a large amount of people around the globe have some kind of self-assembling, nanotechnology inside them already. Especially the people who took the jabs during covid. I suggest to really do your own research before considering taking any vaccines or shots in general. The writing is on the wall, complete control is the goal, and it's already here.

The SCIF

25,975 views • 1 year ago

Apologies For The Long Post 🙏 Beaten Brutally With 50 plus Laathis 8 years ago, in breaking breaths, with Traumatic Brain Injuries, brain matter oozing out, bleeding, injured on whole body,,that's how #streetdog Chotu reached my home on fateful night of 29 April 2017 💔 Everyone said he will not make it as Chotu was in coma for months even after treatment & surgeries. Not losing hope, I kept talking with Chotu, calling his name every few minutes, reminding him to come back to my voice. And Lord, after weeks of sleepless nights, Chotu responded back to me with a clear eye contact & a small wag of tail! That was that then, the #miracledog had pulled through & spent 8 happy years with me & his Canine rescue siblings. Today, his TBI has caused serious neuroinflammation across his brain & nasal cavity. The boy is in pain & is constantly remembering his 8 year old beating as if it's happening at this very moment 😢😢 Chotus treatment is ongoing & we are going to get his MRI & rhinoplasty scheduled as soon as we can. Help me fight another life battle with Chotu, the first time I did it on my own, but now there are 170 plus beings dependent on me, so you are my only hope 🙏 Donate Via UPI at 8810309001@kotak or via link in our bio ♥️ Dog Bless 🙌 #greaternoida #rescueanimals #dogs #devotion #adoptdontshop #dogsofinstagram #rescuedogs
1:04

Sensitive content

Apologies For The Long Post 🙏 Beaten Brutally With 50 plus Laathis 8 years ago, in breaking breaths, with Traumatic Brain Injuries, brain matter oozing out, bleeding, injured on whole body,,that's how #streetdog Chotu reached my home on fateful night of 29 April 2017 💔 Everyone said he will not make it as Chotu was in coma for months even after treatment & surgeries. Not losing hope, I kept talking with Chotu, calling his name every few minutes, reminding him to come back to my voice. And Lord, after weeks of sleepless nights, Chotu responded back to me with a clear eye contact & a small wag of tail! That was that then, the #miracledog had pulled through & spent 8 happy years with me & his Canine rescue siblings. Today, his TBI has caused serious neuroinflammation across his brain & nasal cavity. The boy is in pain & is constantly remembering his 8 year old beating as if it's happening at this very moment 😢😢 Chotus treatment is ongoing & we are going to get his MRI & rhinoplasty scheduled as soon as we can. Help me fight another life battle with Chotu, the first time I did it on my own, but now there are 170 plus beings dependent on me, so you are my only hope 🙏 Donate Via UPI at 8810309001@kotak or via link in our bio ♥️ Dog Bless 🙌 #greaternoida #rescueanimals #dogs #devotion #adoptdontshop #dogsofinstagram #rescuedogs

कावेरी राणा 🐾🐾

17,403 views • 1 year ago

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Dr Mike Yeadon's Austrian Testimony Please watch and share - 15 Mins --------------------------------------- My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon and in the next 10 to 15 minutes I'm going to focus on one major point which is that the purported "vaccines" against this alleged illness, COVID-19 were in my view deliberately designed intentionally to injure, kill and, and reduce fertility. Now this is an allegation I've been making for around three and a half years. In that time, if I was wrong, ladies and gentlemen, I think numerous scientists would have rebutted what I've said in writing and in video. And if I was wrong, I would have expected the drug companies whose products I am maligning to have sought and secured a court injunction to stop me repeating these allegations. Neither of those things have ever happened. What has happened instead is that I have been extraordinarily censored and smeared sideways. And I think I offer that to you as strong evidence that I may be "over the target", at least in relation to these injectable products that have definitely injured and killed many people. So first just brief few words of introduction in terms of credentials. So Mike Yeadon, I've been a professional research scientist for over 30 years in the pharmaceutical industry and in biotech. My first degree was in biochemistry and toxicology. It was a joint honours degree. I got a first, then I did a second degree, a PhD. It's a research based piece of work lasting three years and my focus was respiratory pharmacology, the study of impact of drugs on respiration and so on. And that led into my career where I became a senior research scientist responsible for new drugs to treat allergic, respiratory and later dermatology diseases. I was at one point Vice President and the most senior research person within Pfizer Global R&D, and I left in 2011. And for 10 years after that, seven of those I was founder and CEO of a biotech called ZIARCO which was acquired by Novartis in 2017, since when I've been a consultant although I've discontinued those activities in the last four and a half years or so. So I've not earned a penny from speaking out in the last four and a half years and I don't want to either. There is a longer video by me recorded a month or so ago, 22 minutes long and it's called Silver Bullet and it's on my telegram channel and I hope rather more widely. But today I'm just going to focus on the design and effects of these so called vaccines. So I've been involved all of my professional life with other talented people trying to design and test potential new treatments for respiratory disease and as I say later on dermatology applications. So I can tell you that this, with my background in toxicology and my own research experience, 30 years in the industry, this qualifies me, I think better than any other commentator to evaluate what was in the minds of the people who designed these products. Let me tell you that every component in a medicine is chosen. It's chosen to be there. It's not random. It's chosen to be there to achieve some purpose, that's normal, perhaps to help a drug dissolve, to be absorbed, to persist in your blood, or to leave your body quickly to penetrate the brain if it was a neurological drug, or to stay close to the lung if it was an inhaled drug. So it's quite normal to make choices with objectives in mind. So I believe the intentions of the designers are written into the choices they made, the structures and components, formulation of these products. So I'm going to use those skills, as it were, to back calculate what was in their mind, what objectives did they have when they chose these structures and formulations. So I'm going to just say, before I get into that, just one thing about these so called "vaccines". My experience of the industry over 30 years tells me it is formally impossible to invent, research, test, evaluate, manufacture, gain authorization for, and launch a complex new biological product in under a year. It's formally impossible. I don't care how much money and people you put on it, there are a series of linear steps which when taken together, unless you miss some out, cannot be completed under several years. So if someone told you they had brought a brand new airline to market with new engines in under a year, I think you would know it's formally impossible to do a clean sheet design, to stress test, to manufacture, to test, to flight test, optimise the engines and get regulatory clearance and be ready to take you across the Atlantic in under a year. And of course it's never been done and it's never been done with complex biological products in under a year. So whatever else they did, they didn't do what they said because it cannot be done in under a year. Secondly, and I'll come to the examples in a moment, there are in these products numerous features which in my view, my peers, people like me, people with my training and experience would know for sure would give rise to the toxicities that I pointed out in 2020. They're not, they don't require particular skills you need to know how to do drug discovery and what can go wrong. But I'm not acting like a complete genius in spotting these, just someone who is a professional from this industry that has pointed out numerous features built in by choice that I believe I think they obviously confer toxicology, toxicity to the recipients. And as I've said, people designing these, people like me in wherever they were, pharmaceutical industries or the military, knew these things were going to happen. And that's why I say it's intentional. I'm going to give you three examples that you can go and test. So the first one is these are so called gene based products, that is they've got a string of genetic information in them. Now there aren't any products like that that are in routine use anywhere in the world. So they're brand new technology. But what you'll remember they told you that they do is they cause your body to make as a protein whatever was in that genetic code. Now it's absolutely basic immunology. How is it, do you think your body knows that what's inside of you is meant to be there and you don't attack it? And yet if something gets into your body from the outside or a tumour form, something that shouldn't be in you, your body can recognise that that's foreign or non-self and can attack it. And the answer is you tolerate everything that's meant to be inside your body. When you're in your mum's womb, we, we ruled out the ability to attack ourselves. Unless you get an autoimmune disease in later life, you play nice with yourself until something gets inside you or something goes wrong inside you. So ladies and gentlemen, if you are injected with a genetic sequence that causes you to manufacture a foreign protein, whether it's a virus or something out of a computer, it's not you and it's not meant to be in you, I assure you, your body recognises that it's been invaded, something's in there that shouldn't be and it launch a fatal attack on every cell that it thinks has gone wrong. It's trying to save you. So and that autoimmune reaction that destruction which your body is trying to, is doing because it's trying to protect you, that will happen anywhere in your body, any cell, tissue, organ in your body where unluckily your dose of what was injected into you lands. So if it lands in your heart, you could get myocarditis or a heart attack. If it lands in your brain, you could get a stroke or neurological conditions. If it's in your eyes, you could go blind. If it's in your ovaries, it may sterilise you. But that explains, in my view, a lot of the enormously diverse toxicity that's been seen with these products. So that's one, your body is being made to manufacture something that does not belong in it. And when that happens, everybody with the first lecture of immunology will understand why that happens. It's not an accident, it's in the design. It's a deliberate choice. The second one, then what was encoded in the so called "vaccines", now we're told it's spike protein. I don't think there is a natural spike protein, but proteins with sequences like that are known to be acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction and probably other things I don't know anything about. So that's the second thing your body was making, was forced to make not only a foreign protein, something that didn't belong in your body, you were, your body was forced to make something that was directly toxic to your body. And the person who chose that sequence knew that's what the property of it was. It's not an accident, it's intentional. Then the third one is absolutely shocking. It's normal for drugs to be formulated that is to be wrapped in something. You'll see them in capsules or tablets. They might have a coating. If it's an inhaler, there might be some liquid with it so it can be propelled. In the case of these injectables, they were wrapped in really fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles, which means tiny little particles of fat. Lipid nanoparticles. Ladies and gentlemen, there were papers published as early as 2012, which I read a couple of years ago, that said that it is well understood in the industry by formulators that the payload that's contained within lipid nanoparticles when injected into animals and people leads to a disproportionate deposition of the payload into your ovaries. I remember the day I read that paper, I really couldn't sleep. The person who chose to use lipid nanoparticles to formulate the Moderna and Pfizer products knew perfectly well that what they would do is allow them to drift all through your body, through membranes as if they weren't there, and disproportionately deposit in your ovaries. And given I've told you the first two things, which is that will induce your body to attack every cell in the body that follows the instructions. And that instruction by the way, is to make a poison, you should no longer be surprised that people have been injured and killed and had their fertility reduced. I wish I didn't have to communicate this information. But there is no possibility that the people involved in designing these products did not know that they would have the effects that I predicted and that so many people have actually experienced it is intentional. There is ample evidence that this assault, which is not the only thing that's ever happened, unfortunately it's the first I noticed. I was a so called normie until 2020. I believe everything I was told. But this is part of a long planned assault by powerful wealthy people operating above the level of nation. So I'm afraid organisations like the United Nations, the World Health Organisation, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Economic Forum are populated by the people who I believe have orchestrated this attack on humanity and they're going to do it again. There are factories all around the world busy manufacturing these so called "vaccines" and formulating them in the way I just described. And they're going to come up with contrived reasons why you need to roll your sleeve up and I'm telling you, for the love of God, please don't do it. The only way we will push these people away is by speaking out as we see it and simply refusing to follow absurd instructions no matter what ostensible reason they come up with for you to do that.. So I mentioned I have been subject to astonishing censorship and smearing. And that's true. I've always said, if you hear me, please repeat what I have said to other people. I've got a tiny reach because I'm censored and no one else is coming to save us. It's just a small number of us who are not willing to stay quiet while this is done to us. But it's part of a wider deception. The pandemic lie is a major one. I don't have time to go into it now, but see my other recording. But there wasn't a pandemic. There's never been a pandemic. They can't happen. It's a lie. The so called human induced climate change crisis, that's all a lie as well. It's the same people who put this together at the end of the 1960s, the Club of Rome, they chose these two topics of infectious disease and climate change to scare people because they realised it would force a response from above the level of nation. But I'm saying, stand on your own feet and tell them to get lost with their absurd lies. And there's a third lie which underlies these, and it's they believe. They tell us we've been told all our lives, that the world is overpopulated. And it's literally absurd if you're up in an aeroplane within a few minutes, even over a busy city, the place is just full of cities and forests and fields. So that's yet another lie. But I think that's what's driving them. They think there's too many of us little people, and they seek to control us digitally and then eventually inject us to death. Its only going to be stopped then by refusal to cooperate. And that's my testimony. I hope that was helpful to.
15:14

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Dr Mike Yeadon's Austrian Testimony Please watch and share - 15 Mins --------------------------------------- My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon and in the next 10 to 15 minutes I'm going to focus on one major point which is that the purported "vaccines" against this alleged illness, COVID-19 were in my view deliberately designed intentionally to injure, kill and, and reduce fertility. Now this is an allegation I've been making for around three and a half years. In that time, if I was wrong, ladies and gentlemen, I think numerous scientists would have rebutted what I've said in writing and in video. And if I was wrong, I would have expected the drug companies whose products I am maligning to have sought and secured a court injunction to stop me repeating these allegations. Neither of those things have ever happened. What has happened instead is that I have been extraordinarily censored and smeared sideways. And I think I offer that to you as strong evidence that I may be "over the target", at least in relation to these injectable products that have definitely injured and killed many people. So first just brief few words of introduction in terms of credentials. So Mike Yeadon, I've been a professional research scientist for over 30 years in the pharmaceutical industry and in biotech. My first degree was in biochemistry and toxicology. It was a joint honours degree. I got a first, then I did a second degree, a PhD. It's a research based piece of work lasting three years and my focus was respiratory pharmacology, the study of impact of drugs on respiration and so on. And that led into my career where I became a senior research scientist responsible for new drugs to treat allergic, respiratory and later dermatology diseases. I was at one point Vice President and the most senior research person within Pfizer Global R&D, and I left in 2011. And for 10 years after that, seven of those I was founder and CEO of a biotech called ZIARCO which was acquired by Novartis in 2017, since when I've been a consultant although I've discontinued those activities in the last four and a half years or so. So I've not earned a penny from speaking out in the last four and a half years and I don't want to either. There is a longer video by me recorded a month or so ago, 22 minutes long and it's called Silver Bullet and it's on my telegram channel and I hope rather more widely. But today I'm just going to focus on the design and effects of these so called vaccines. So I've been involved all of my professional life with other talented people trying to design and test potential new treatments for respiratory disease and as I say later on dermatology applications. So I can tell you that this, with my background in toxicology and my own research experience, 30 years in the industry, this qualifies me, I think better than any other commentator to evaluate what was in the minds of the people who designed these products. Let me tell you that every component in a medicine is chosen. It's chosen to be there. It's not random. It's chosen to be there to achieve some purpose, that's normal, perhaps to help a drug dissolve, to be absorbed, to persist in your blood, or to leave your body quickly to penetrate the brain if it was a neurological drug, or to stay close to the lung if it was an inhaled drug. So it's quite normal to make choices with objectives in mind. So I believe the intentions of the designers are written into the choices they made, the structures and components, formulation of these products. So I'm going to use those skills, as it were, to back calculate what was in their mind, what objectives did they have when they chose these structures and formulations. So I'm going to just say, before I get into that, just one thing about these so called "vaccines". My experience of the industry over 30 years tells me it is formally impossible to invent, research, test, evaluate, manufacture, gain authorization for, and launch a complex new biological product in under a year. It's formally impossible. I don't care how much money and people you put on it, there are a series of linear steps which when taken together, unless you miss some out, cannot be completed under several years. So if someone told you they had brought a brand new airline to market with new engines in under a year, I think you would know it's formally impossible to do a clean sheet design, to stress test, to manufacture, to test, to flight test, optimise the engines and get regulatory clearance and be ready to take you across the Atlantic in under a year. And of course it's never been done and it's never been done with complex biological products in under a year. So whatever else they did, they didn't do what they said because it cannot be done in under a year. Secondly, and I'll come to the examples in a moment, there are in these products numerous features which in my view, my peers, people like me, people with my training and experience would know for sure would give rise to the toxicities that I pointed out in 2020. They're not, they don't require particular skills you need to know how to do drug discovery and what can go wrong. But I'm not acting like a complete genius in spotting these, just someone who is a professional from this industry that has pointed out numerous features built in by choice that I believe I think they obviously confer toxicology, toxicity to the recipients. And as I've said, people designing these, people like me in wherever they were, pharmaceutical industries or the military, knew these things were going to happen. And that's why I say it's intentional. I'm going to give you three examples that you can go and test. So the first one is these are so called gene based products, that is they've got a string of genetic information in them. Now there aren't any products like that that are in routine use anywhere in the world. So they're brand new technology. But what you'll remember they told you that they do is they cause your body to make as a protein whatever was in that genetic code. Now it's absolutely basic immunology. How is it, do you think your body knows that what's inside of you is meant to be there and you don't attack it? And yet if something gets into your body from the outside or a tumour form, something that shouldn't be in you, your body can recognise that that's foreign or non-self and can attack it. And the answer is you tolerate everything that's meant to be inside your body. When you're in your mum's womb, we, we ruled out the ability to attack ourselves. Unless you get an autoimmune disease in later life, you play nice with yourself until something gets inside you or something goes wrong inside you. So ladies and gentlemen, if you are injected with a genetic sequence that causes you to manufacture a foreign protein, whether it's a virus or something out of a computer, it's not you and it's not meant to be in you, I assure you, your body recognises that it's been invaded, something's in there that shouldn't be and it launch a fatal attack on every cell that it thinks has gone wrong. It's trying to save you. So and that autoimmune reaction that destruction which your body is trying to, is doing because it's trying to protect you, that will happen anywhere in your body, any cell, tissue, organ in your body where unluckily your dose of what was injected into you lands. So if it lands in your heart, you could get myocarditis or a heart attack. If it lands in your brain, you could get a stroke or neurological conditions. If it's in your eyes, you could go blind. If it's in your ovaries, it may sterilise you. But that explains, in my view, a lot of the enormously diverse toxicity that's been seen with these products. So that's one, your body is being made to manufacture something that does not belong in it. And when that happens, everybody with the first lecture of immunology will understand why that happens. It's not an accident, it's in the design. It's a deliberate choice. The second one, then what was encoded in the so called "vaccines", now we're told it's spike protein. I don't think there is a natural spike protein, but proteins with sequences like that are known to be acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction and probably other things I don't know anything about. So that's the second thing your body was making, was forced to make not only a foreign protein, something that didn't belong in your body, you were, your body was forced to make something that was directly toxic to your body. And the person who chose that sequence knew that's what the property of it was. It's not an accident, it's intentional. Then the third one is absolutely shocking. It's normal for drugs to be formulated that is to be wrapped in something. You'll see them in capsules or tablets. They might have a coating. If it's an inhaler, there might be some liquid with it so it can be propelled. In the case of these injectables, they were wrapped in really fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles, which means tiny little particles of fat. Lipid nanoparticles. Ladies and gentlemen, there were papers published as early as 2012, which I read a couple of years ago, that said that it is well understood in the industry by formulators that the payload that's contained within lipid nanoparticles when injected into animals and people leads to a disproportionate deposition of the payload into your ovaries. I remember the day I read that paper, I really couldn't sleep. The person who chose to use lipid nanoparticles to formulate the Moderna and Pfizer products knew perfectly well that what they would do is allow them to drift all through your body, through membranes as if they weren't there, and disproportionately deposit in your ovaries. And given I've told you the first two things, which is that will induce your body to attack every cell in the body that follows the instructions. And that instruction by the way, is to make a poison, you should no longer be surprised that people have been injured and killed and had their fertility reduced. I wish I didn't have to communicate this information. But there is no possibility that the people involved in designing these products did not know that they would have the effects that I predicted and that so many people have actually experienced it is intentional. There is ample evidence that this assault, which is not the only thing that's ever happened, unfortunately it's the first I noticed. I was a so called normie until 2020. I believe everything I was told. But this is part of a long planned assault by powerful wealthy people operating above the level of nation. So I'm afraid organisations like the United Nations, the World Health Organisation, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Economic Forum are populated by the people who I believe have orchestrated this attack on humanity and they're going to do it again. There are factories all around the world busy manufacturing these so called "vaccines" and formulating them in the way I just described. And they're going to come up with contrived reasons why you need to roll your sleeve up and I'm telling you, for the love of God, please don't do it. The only way we will push these people away is by speaking out as we see it and simply refusing to follow absurd instructions no matter what ostensible reason they come up with for you to do that.. So I mentioned I have been subject to astonishing censorship and smearing. And that's true. I've always said, if you hear me, please repeat what I have said to other people. I've got a tiny reach because I'm censored and no one else is coming to save us. It's just a small number of us who are not willing to stay quiet while this is done to us. But it's part of a wider deception. The pandemic lie is a major one. I don't have time to go into it now, but see my other recording. But there wasn't a pandemic. There's never been a pandemic. They can't happen. It's a lie. The so called human induced climate change crisis, that's all a lie as well. It's the same people who put this together at the end of the 1960s, the Club of Rome, they chose these two topics of infectious disease and climate change to scare people because they realised it would force a response from above the level of nation. But I'm saying, stand on your own feet and tell them to get lost with their absurd lies. And there's a third lie which underlies these, and it's they believe. They tell us we've been told all our lives, that the world is overpopulated. And it's literally absurd if you're up in an aeroplane within a few minutes, even over a busy city, the place is just full of cities and forests and fields. So that's yet another lie. But I think that's what's driving them. They think there's too many of us little people, and they seek to control us digitally and then eventually inject us to death. Its only going to be stopped then by refusal to cooperate. And that's my testimony. I hope that was helpful to.

aussie17

78,583 views • 1 year ago

Nobody talks about how hard the beginning of carnivore actually is. I'm going to. When I started, I had no idea what I was doing. I came from a low-fat mindset. I was eating chicken breast and eggs and keto-style foods, trying to figure it out as I went. I didn't understand fat intake. I didn't understand electrolytes. I was just doing my best. By day four and five, I felt like I'd been hit by a car. My body ached everywhere. The cravings were more intense than anything I'd ever experienced. The food noise was deafening. I cried more than once that first week because my brain was genuinely going through withdrawal from sugar and dopamine. I thought something was wrong with me. It wasn't. It's a normal part of transitioning away from carbs. But I didn't know that, and nobody told me. It took weeks before I understood electrolytes. Even longer before I understood fat adaptation. Around weeks three and four I finally learned that increasing dietary fat was the key, not restricting it. After several months of intentionally eating more fat, the cravings changed completely. Later I went through a dopamine detox where I removed sweeteners, gum, dairy, and comfort foods so my brain could reset its reward system. That changed everything about how strong the cravings felt and how long they lasted. Today I still get cravings sometimes. But they're quiet thoughts now, not urgent signals. There's a difference. I wrote my book and created my Week Zero Grocery Guide and First 7 Days Survival Guide because I didn't have any of this support when I started. I don't want that to be your story too. 👑All resources in my bio
2:46

Nobody talks about how hard the beginning of carnivore actually is. I'm going to. When I started, I had no idea what I was doing. I came from a low-fat mindset. I was eating chicken breast and eggs and keto-style foods, trying to figure it out as I went. I didn't understand fat intake. I didn't understand electrolytes. I was just doing my best. By day four and five, I felt like I'd been hit by a car. My body ached everywhere. The cravings were more intense than anything I'd ever experienced. The food noise was deafening. I cried more than once that first week because my brain was genuinely going through withdrawal from sugar and dopamine. I thought something was wrong with me. It wasn't. It's a normal part of transitioning away from carbs. But I didn't know that, and nobody told me. It took weeks before I understood electrolytes. Even longer before I understood fat adaptation. Around weeks three and four I finally learned that increasing dietary fat was the key, not restricting it. After several months of intentionally eating more fat, the cravings changed completely. Later I went through a dopamine detox where I removed sweeteners, gum, dairy, and comfort foods so my brain could reset its reward system. That changed everything about how strong the cravings felt and how long they lasted. Today I still get cravings sometimes. But they're quiet thoughts now, not urgent signals. There's a difference. I wrote my book and created my Week Zero Grocery Guide and First 7 Days Survival Guide because I didn't have any of this support when I started. I don't want that to be your story too. 👑All resources in my bio

Queen of Carni

18,456 views • 4 months ago

WHY YOU WAKE UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT Your brain has 20,000 neurons clustered in the hypothalamus. They form the suprachiasmatic nucleus. This is your master clock. It's been running since before birth. At 25, this clock kept you unconscious until morning. At 65, the same clock runs on less melatonin, weaker signals, and a rhythm that physically shifted 2-3 hours earlier. It fires a wake signal between 2-4 a.m. Four systems inside your body shifted with age. They converge at the same hour every night. The thoughts that arrive at 3 a.m. feel different from the same thoughts at 3 p.m. because your brain runs a different program in the dark. The part that would normally tell you those thoughts aren't emergencies is still asleep. THE CLOCK MOVED FORWARD The suprachiasmatic nucleus generates a near 24-hour rhythm controlling when you feel alert and when you feel sleepy. In young adults, peak sleepiness arrives around 11 p.m. Peak alertness arrives around 9-10 a.m. Blue light at 480 nanometers activates melanopsin cells in the retina. These cells send signals directly to the suprachiasmatic nucleus, synchronizing your clock to the day-night cycle. With age, the clock shifts earlier. This is circadian phase advance. The sleepiness signal arrives at 7-8 p.m. instead of 11 p.m. The wake signal arrives at 3-4 a.m. instead of 6-7 a.m. The entire sleep-wake window moves forward 2-3 hours. The suprachiasmatic nucleus itself degrades. Neurons deteriorate. The amplitude of the circadian signal weakens. Peaks become shallower. Troughs become less deep. The radio station loses transmitter power until the signal becomes fuzzy and inconsistent. The clock's sensitivity to light cues diminishes through two mechanisms. The aging lens yellows and thickens, filtering more blue light before it reaches the melanopsin cells. The suprachiasmatic neurons themselves respond less robustly to whatever signal does arrive. Weaker input through a cloudier window. Less responsive neurons processing that input. The clock drifts. When the circadian clock drifts without strong light cues, it drifts earlier. Phase advance is the default direction of an unanchored aging clock. MELATONIN COLLAPSED The pineal gland releases melatonin at night to initiate and maintain sleep. This hormone declines with age. The pineal gland calcifies gradually over decades, reducing functional tissue and capacity to produce melatonin. By 65, nighttime melatonin levels can be one-third to one-quarter of what they were at 30. Sometimes less. Melatonin doesn't just initiate sleep. It maintains depth and continuity across the full night. When melatonin is low, sleep is shallower, more fragmented, more vulnerable to interruption. Even if you fall asleep at a reasonable hour, low melatonin cannot hold you through to morning. Your body tries to put you to sleep at 8 p.m. and wake you at 3 a.m. That's a 7-hour sleep window. It might be enough sleep for your shifted clock. But you fight the 8 o'clock drowsiness. Social life, television, family, habit. You stay up until 10 or 11. The clock doesn't adjust to your social schedule. It fires the wake signal at 3 regardless. The clock runs on light and biology, not preferences. You lost 2-3 hours from the front of your sleep window by staying up late. The alarm still goes off on the original schedule. The 3 a.m. waking isn't a malfunction. It's your shifted clock doing exactly what it was programmed to do. This is social jet lag. The gap between your biological clock time and your social clock time creates the same physiological mismatch as flying across two or three time zones. Your body is in one time zone. Your social life is in another. The drowsiness you fight at 8 p.m. is your body's genuine sleep onset signal. The waking at 3 a.m. is your body's genuine wake signal. The problem isn't the signals. The problem is overriding one without being able to override the other. There's a compounding factor. The shifted clock means your body wants to sleep earlier. The reduced melatonin means it cannot hold sleep as deeply or as long. You're caught between two problems: a clock that fires the wake signal too early and a chemical supply that cannot maintain the sleep signal through the full night. Even if you went to bed at 8, the reduced melatonin might still fail to hold you past 3 or 4. The clock shifted the window. The melatonin shrank it. DEEP SLEEP DISAPPEARED Sleep cycles through stages roughly every 90 minutes. Light sleep, deeper sleep, deeper sleep, then REM. The stage that matters most for feeling rested is slow-wave sleep, stage N3, the deepest phase. Brainwaves drop to large, slow delta oscillations at 0.5-4 hertz. During slow-wave sleep, the glymphatic system activates. Cerebrospinal fluid flushes through brain tissue along channels that open when neurons shrink slightly during deep sleep. This clears metabolic waste: adenosine, the molecule that builds sleep pressure during the day, and amyloid beta proteins, the plaques associated with Alzheimer's disease. Growth hormone pulses during N3. Tissue repair peaks. Memory consolidation occurs. The hippocampus replays the day's experiences and transfers them to long-term cortical storage. This is the sleep that makes you feel like you actually slept. At 25, roughly 20% of the night is spent in slow-wave sleep. By 65, that drops to 10-15%. By 75, some people get almost none. My sleep tracker tells me that I almost never get less than 30%... and I'm 60. It is possible to have restorative deep sleep no matter what your age is. In my case even at lower sleep duration. High energy availability alsp plays a big role. The slow wave generating circuits in the medial prefrontal cortex usually deteriorate with age, producing weaker and less frequent delta oscillations. The deep sleep itself becomes shallower. The waves are smaller. The duration shorter. The restorative process is less complete. If deep sleep is the period when the brain clears amyloid beta, then reduced deep sleep means reduced clearance. Less deep sleep leads to more amyloid, which leads to less deep sleep, which leads to more amyloid. The relationship is bidirectional and self-reinforcing. If you never feel fully rested no matter how many hours you spend in bed, if 8 hours produces the recovery that 6 hours used to produce, if you wake in the morning with the sense that something was missing from the night, the missing component may be slow wave sleep. The hours were there. The depth was not. Slow-wave sleep that remains concentrates in the first half of the night, the first two to three sleep cycles. By 2-3 a.m., most of the deep sleep budget has been spent. What remains for the second half of the night is lighter stage one and stage two sleep, interspersed with REM. Light sleep has a dramatically lower arousal threshold. Stimuli that would not have registered during slow-wave sleep can push you above the waking threshold in light sleep. A slight temperature change in the room. A bathroom urge from a bladder that fills faster with age. A noise from outside. Even the natural shift in body position. You wake at 3 a.m. partly because the sleep you're in at 3 a.m. is physiologically different from the sleep you're in at midnight. The fortress walls got thinner as the night progressed. By 3 o'clock, you're sleeping behind a screen door instead of a vault. You could sleep through thunderstorms at 30. Now you wake at the sound of a refrigerator cycling on. The physics isn't about the noise. It's about the stage of sleep you're in when the noise arrives. At midnight, during slow-wave sleep, your arousal threshold is high. The brain runs delta waves that suppress responsiveness to external stimuli. At 3 a.m. in stage 1 or stage 2, the threshold has dropped to a fraction of its midnight level. The same sound that the sleeping brain would have filtered at midnight wakes you at 3 because the brain is no longer running the program that filters it. CORTISOL ARRIVED EARLY Your body runs a cortisol rhythm called the cortisol awakening response. In the final hours of sleep, the adrenal glands begin increasing cortisol output, preparing the body for waking. Mobilizing glucose into the bloodstream. Priming the immune system for the day's pathogens. Raising blood pressure and heart rate toward daytime operating levels. In a young adult, this cortisol rise begins around 4-5 a.m. and peaks roughly 30-45 minutes after waking. With age, the rise begins earlier. 2-3 a.m. in many older adults. Low-carb diets can also trigger a relatively strong cortisol release, waking you up early.. The same circadian phase advance that shifted the sleep-wake window also shifted the cortisol curve. Every rhythm the suprachiasmatic nucleus controls moves in the same direction. Cortisol alone doesn't wake you. But combined with already light sleep and a shifted circadian clock, the cortisol rise adds a third signal, pushing you toward wakefulness at precisely the hour when the other two systems have already weakened your defenses. Three systems converging on the same window. The clock says wake up. The sleep stage says the walls are thin. The cortisol says the body is preparing for morning. All three signals arrive at 3 a.m. Not by coincidence. All three are governed by the same shifted circadian master clock. If the waking comes at almost exactly the same time every night, not randomly scattered across the early morning hours but clustered within the same 30-minute window, that precision is the signature of a circadian event. Cortisol is antagonistic to melatonin. The two hormones suppress each other. Cortisol inhibits melatonin production. Melatonin suppresses cortisol. In a young person with high melatonin and correctly timed cortisol, the two hormones hand off smoothly. Melatonin dominates the night. Cortisol rises toward morning. The transition is seamless. In an aging body with depleted melatonin and early-arriving cortisol, the handoff happens too soon. When cortisol starts rising at 2-3 a.m. and melatonin is already low, the biochemical conditions for staying asleep collapse. The melatonin that should be holding you under is insufficient. The cortisol that should not be arriving for another two hours is already here. Two hormones that are supposed to hand off like relay runners, one finishing as the other begins, instead collide in the same hour because both shifted on the same aging clock. The balance tips toward waking. THE WORST THOUGHTS ARRIVE When you wake at 6-7 a.m., cortisol is high, light enters your eyes, and your prefrontal cortex comes online in its task-oriented mode. You think about what to do, what to eat, where to go. Executive function engages. The thinking is directed, practical, forward-looking. Problems that exist at 7 a.m. feel like problems to be solved. Manageable, bounded, addressable. When you wake at 3 a.m. in the dark with no tasks to perform and no light to signal daytime, a different network activates. The default mode network. The brain's self-referential processing system fires in the absence of external input and directed task. This is the rumination network. It runs replays of conversations you had years ago. It generates worry scenarios about events that may never happen. It revisits regrets from decades past with a vividness that feels more real than memory should. It rehearses confrontations that will never take place. It asks questions that have no answers at any hour, let alone at 3 a.m. At 3 a.m., the default mode network has nothing competing with it. No light. No task. No external stimulation. No social interaction. And the executive prefrontal cortex that would normally evaluate, contextualize, and override the rumination is still partially offline. The prefrontal cortex is the last brain region to fully activate upon waking. It requires light exposure and time to reach full operating capacity. This is the region that says this thought is not an emergency. This worry is not proportionate to reality. This problem can wait until morning and will look different then. At 3 a.m., that region is sleeping while the default mode network runs at full power. You're awake enough to think. But the thinking is the uncontrolled, self-referential, catastrophizing kind. The system that controls and contextualizes thought has not caught up with the system that generates it. The worry loop feels more intense at 3 a.m. than the same thoughts would feel at 3 p.m. because the brain regions that regulate emotional response and assign proportionality are not yet operational. You're running the worry software without the control software. The thoughts feel urgent and catastrophic because the part of your brain that would tell you they are neither is still asleep. The thoughts are not true in the way they feel true. They're running on hardware that cannot evaluate them yet. The 3 a.m. thoughts have a specific quality that daytime worry doesn't. A sense of certainty. Of inevitability. Of problems being larger and solutions being fewer than they actually are. The distortion isn't emotional. It's architectural. The brain regions that generate worry are online. The brain regions that evaluate worry are not. By 7 a.m., when the prefrontal cortex has fully activated and light has entered the eyes and cortisol has reached its appropriate peak, the same problems that felt catastrophic at 3 a.m. feel manageable. Nothing changed about the problems. Everything changed about which brain regions are processing them. If you've lain in the dark at 3 a.m. and felt that your problems were larger, your regrets sharper, your fears more certain than they would be by breakfast, that wasn't weakness. It wasn't anxiety disorder. It was the default mode network running without prefrontal supervision, amplified by cortisol that arrived early, in a brain that had already run through its deep sleep budget and could not pull you back under. Four systems, all doing what the physics of aging programmed them to do, all converging on the same hour. Subscribers have access to detailed practical applications of remedies in a second attached post.
5:35

WHY YOU WAKE UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT Your brain has 20,000 neurons clustered in the hypothalamus. They form the suprachiasmatic nucleus. This is your master clock. It's been running since before birth. At 25, this clock kept you unconscious until morning. At 65, the same clock runs on less melatonin, weaker signals, and a rhythm that physically shifted 2-3 hours earlier. It fires a wake signal between 2-4 a.m. Four systems inside your body shifted with age. They converge at the same hour every night. The thoughts that arrive at 3 a.m. feel different from the same thoughts at 3 p.m. because your brain runs a different program in the dark. The part that would normally tell you those thoughts aren't emergencies is still asleep. THE CLOCK MOVED FORWARD The suprachiasmatic nucleus generates a near 24-hour rhythm controlling when you feel alert and when you feel sleepy. In young adults, peak sleepiness arrives around 11 p.m. Peak alertness arrives around 9-10 a.m. Blue light at 480 nanometers activates melanopsin cells in the retina. These cells send signals directly to the suprachiasmatic nucleus, synchronizing your clock to the day-night cycle. With age, the clock shifts earlier. This is circadian phase advance. The sleepiness signal arrives at 7-8 p.m. instead of 11 p.m. The wake signal arrives at 3-4 a.m. instead of 6-7 a.m. The entire sleep-wake window moves forward 2-3 hours. The suprachiasmatic nucleus itself degrades. Neurons deteriorate. The amplitude of the circadian signal weakens. Peaks become shallower. Troughs become less deep. The radio station loses transmitter power until the signal becomes fuzzy and inconsistent. The clock's sensitivity to light cues diminishes through two mechanisms. The aging lens yellows and thickens, filtering more blue light before it reaches the melanopsin cells. The suprachiasmatic neurons themselves respond less robustly to whatever signal does arrive. Weaker input through a cloudier window. Less responsive neurons processing that input. The clock drifts. When the circadian clock drifts without strong light cues, it drifts earlier. Phase advance is the default direction of an unanchored aging clock. MELATONIN COLLAPSED The pineal gland releases melatonin at night to initiate and maintain sleep. This hormone declines with age. The pineal gland calcifies gradually over decades, reducing functional tissue and capacity to produce melatonin. By 65, nighttime melatonin levels can be one-third to one-quarter of what they were at 30. Sometimes less. Melatonin doesn't just initiate sleep. It maintains depth and continuity across the full night. When melatonin is low, sleep is shallower, more fragmented, more vulnerable to interruption. Even if you fall asleep at a reasonable hour, low melatonin cannot hold you through to morning. Your body tries to put you to sleep at 8 p.m. and wake you at 3 a.m. That's a 7-hour sleep window. It might be enough sleep for your shifted clock. But you fight the 8 o'clock drowsiness. Social life, television, family, habit. You stay up until 10 or 11. The clock doesn't adjust to your social schedule. It fires the wake signal at 3 regardless. The clock runs on light and biology, not preferences. You lost 2-3 hours from the front of your sleep window by staying up late. The alarm still goes off on the original schedule. The 3 a.m. waking isn't a malfunction. It's your shifted clock doing exactly what it was programmed to do. This is social jet lag. The gap between your biological clock time and your social clock time creates the same physiological mismatch as flying across two or three time zones. Your body is in one time zone. Your social life is in another. The drowsiness you fight at 8 p.m. is your body's genuine sleep onset signal. The waking at 3 a.m. is your body's genuine wake signal. The problem isn't the signals. The problem is overriding one without being able to override the other. There's a compounding factor. The shifted clock means your body wants to sleep earlier. The reduced melatonin means it cannot hold sleep as deeply or as long. You're caught between two problems: a clock that fires the wake signal too early and a chemical supply that cannot maintain the sleep signal through the full night. Even if you went to bed at 8, the reduced melatonin might still fail to hold you past 3 or 4. The clock shifted the window. The melatonin shrank it. DEEP SLEEP DISAPPEARED Sleep cycles through stages roughly every 90 minutes. Light sleep, deeper sleep, deeper sleep, then REM. The stage that matters most for feeling rested is slow-wave sleep, stage N3, the deepest phase. Brainwaves drop to large, slow delta oscillations at 0.5-4 hertz. During slow-wave sleep, the glymphatic system activates. Cerebrospinal fluid flushes through brain tissue along channels that open when neurons shrink slightly during deep sleep. This clears metabolic waste: adenosine, the molecule that builds sleep pressure during the day, and amyloid beta proteins, the plaques associated with Alzheimer's disease. Growth hormone pulses during N3. Tissue repair peaks. Memory consolidation occurs. The hippocampus replays the day's experiences and transfers them to long-term cortical storage. This is the sleep that makes you feel like you actually slept. At 25, roughly 20% of the night is spent in slow-wave sleep. By 65, that drops to 10-15%. By 75, some people get almost none. My sleep tracker tells me that I almost never get less than 30%... and I'm 60. It is possible to have restorative deep sleep no matter what your age is. In my case even at lower sleep duration. High energy availability alsp plays a big role. The slow wave generating circuits in the medial prefrontal cortex usually deteriorate with age, producing weaker and less frequent delta oscillations. The deep sleep itself becomes shallower. The waves are smaller. The duration shorter. The restorative process is less complete. If deep sleep is the period when the brain clears amyloid beta, then reduced deep sleep means reduced clearance. Less deep sleep leads to more amyloid, which leads to less deep sleep, which leads to more amyloid. The relationship is bidirectional and self-reinforcing. If you never feel fully rested no matter how many hours you spend in bed, if 8 hours produces the recovery that 6 hours used to produce, if you wake in the morning with the sense that something was missing from the night, the missing component may be slow wave sleep. The hours were there. The depth was not. Slow-wave sleep that remains concentrates in the first half of the night, the first two to three sleep cycles. By 2-3 a.m., most of the deep sleep budget has been spent. What remains for the second half of the night is lighter stage one and stage two sleep, interspersed with REM. Light sleep has a dramatically lower arousal threshold. Stimuli that would not have registered during slow-wave sleep can push you above the waking threshold in light sleep. A slight temperature change in the room. A bathroom urge from a bladder that fills faster with age. A noise from outside. Even the natural shift in body position. You wake at 3 a.m. partly because the sleep you're in at 3 a.m. is physiologically different from the sleep you're in at midnight. The fortress walls got thinner as the night progressed. By 3 o'clock, you're sleeping behind a screen door instead of a vault. You could sleep through thunderstorms at 30. Now you wake at the sound of a refrigerator cycling on. The physics isn't about the noise. It's about the stage of sleep you're in when the noise arrives. At midnight, during slow-wave sleep, your arousal threshold is high. The brain runs delta waves that suppress responsiveness to external stimuli. At 3 a.m. in stage 1 or stage 2, the threshold has dropped to a fraction of its midnight level. The same sound that the sleeping brain would have filtered at midnight wakes you at 3 because the brain is no longer running the program that filters it. CORTISOL ARRIVED EARLY Your body runs a cortisol rhythm called the cortisol awakening response. In the final hours of sleep, the adrenal glands begin increasing cortisol output, preparing the body for waking. Mobilizing glucose into the bloodstream. Priming the immune system for the day's pathogens. Raising blood pressure and heart rate toward daytime operating levels. In a young adult, this cortisol rise begins around 4-5 a.m. and peaks roughly 30-45 minutes after waking. With age, the rise begins earlier. 2-3 a.m. in many older adults. Low-carb diets can also trigger a relatively strong cortisol release, waking you up early.. The same circadian phase advance that shifted the sleep-wake window also shifted the cortisol curve. Every rhythm the suprachiasmatic nucleus controls moves in the same direction. Cortisol alone doesn't wake you. But combined with already light sleep and a shifted circadian clock, the cortisol rise adds a third signal, pushing you toward wakefulness at precisely the hour when the other two systems have already weakened your defenses. Three systems converging on the same window. The clock says wake up. The sleep stage says the walls are thin. The cortisol says the body is preparing for morning. All three signals arrive at 3 a.m. Not by coincidence. All three are governed by the same shifted circadian master clock. If the waking comes at almost exactly the same time every night, not randomly scattered across the early morning hours but clustered within the same 30-minute window, that precision is the signature of a circadian event. Cortisol is antagonistic to melatonin. The two hormones suppress each other. Cortisol inhibits melatonin production. Melatonin suppresses cortisol. In a young person with high melatonin and correctly timed cortisol, the two hormones hand off smoothly. Melatonin dominates the night. Cortisol rises toward morning. The transition is seamless. In an aging body with depleted melatonin and early-arriving cortisol, the handoff happens too soon. When cortisol starts rising at 2-3 a.m. and melatonin is already low, the biochemical conditions for staying asleep collapse. The melatonin that should be holding you under is insufficient. The cortisol that should not be arriving for another two hours is already here. Two hormones that are supposed to hand off like relay runners, one finishing as the other begins, instead collide in the same hour because both shifted on the same aging clock. The balance tips toward waking. THE WORST THOUGHTS ARRIVE When you wake at 6-7 a.m., cortisol is high, light enters your eyes, and your prefrontal cortex comes online in its task-oriented mode. You think about what to do, what to eat, where to go. Executive function engages. The thinking is directed, practical, forward-looking. Problems that exist at 7 a.m. feel like problems to be solved. Manageable, bounded, addressable. When you wake at 3 a.m. in the dark with no tasks to perform and no light to signal daytime, a different network activates. The default mode network. The brain's self-referential processing system fires in the absence of external input and directed task. This is the rumination network. It runs replays of conversations you had years ago. It generates worry scenarios about events that may never happen. It revisits regrets from decades past with a vividness that feels more real than memory should. It rehearses confrontations that will never take place. It asks questions that have no answers at any hour, let alone at 3 a.m. At 3 a.m., the default mode network has nothing competing with it. No light. No task. No external stimulation. No social interaction. And the executive prefrontal cortex that would normally evaluate, contextualize, and override the rumination is still partially offline. The prefrontal cortex is the last brain region to fully activate upon waking. It requires light exposure and time to reach full operating capacity. This is the region that says this thought is not an emergency. This worry is not proportionate to reality. This problem can wait until morning and will look different then. At 3 a.m., that region is sleeping while the default mode network runs at full power. You're awake enough to think. But the thinking is the uncontrolled, self-referential, catastrophizing kind. The system that controls and contextualizes thought has not caught up with the system that generates it. The worry loop feels more intense at 3 a.m. than the same thoughts would feel at 3 p.m. because the brain regions that regulate emotional response and assign proportionality are not yet operational. You're running the worry software without the control software. The thoughts feel urgent and catastrophic because the part of your brain that would tell you they are neither is still asleep. The thoughts are not true in the way they feel true. They're running on hardware that cannot evaluate them yet. The 3 a.m. thoughts have a specific quality that daytime worry doesn't. A sense of certainty. Of inevitability. Of problems being larger and solutions being fewer than they actually are. The distortion isn't emotional. It's architectural. The brain regions that generate worry are online. The brain regions that evaluate worry are not. By 7 a.m., when the prefrontal cortex has fully activated and light has entered the eyes and cortisol has reached its appropriate peak, the same problems that felt catastrophic at 3 a.m. feel manageable. Nothing changed about the problems. Everything changed about which brain regions are processing them. If you've lain in the dark at 3 a.m. and felt that your problems were larger, your regrets sharper, your fears more certain than they would be by breakfast, that wasn't weakness. It wasn't anxiety disorder. It was the default mode network running without prefrontal supervision, amplified by cortisol that arrived early, in a brain that had already run through its deep sleep budget and could not pull you back under. Four systems, all doing what the physics of aging programmed them to do, all converging on the same hour. Subscribers have access to detailed practical applications of remedies in a second attached post.

Metabolic Uncle

12,138 views • 3 months ago

Just pulled up Olipop's landing page after seeing their ads everywhere lately and I need to break this down because this is one of the cleaner DTC pages I've seen in a while. Here's what's actually happening when you land on this page and why it converts cold Facebook traffic better than 90% of ecom brands right now: 1) The first 3 seconds Before you read a single word, there's a video of the product being poured, fizzing, bubbling and condensation on the can with no voiceover or text overlay. Your brain processes that faster than any headline ever could. You can almost hear the fizz. That's intentional. They're triggering a sensory response before your logical brain even wakes up. Then the headline hits. "A New Kind of Soda." Now that's a category repositioning. They're not saying "healthy soda" or "better soda." They're saying the entire category you grew up with needs a new version and this is it. Sub-headline says high fiber, less sugar. Targets exactly the person who clicked the health-focused ad on Instagram. Message match is perfect. The person who clicked the ad lands here and immediately feels like the page was made for them. 2) The product carousel Most brands mess this up by showing you the product and making you go through three more pages to add it to your cart. Olipop lets you hover over any flavor and an "Add 12 Pack" button appears right there. One click. Done. You never leave the homepage. That little micro-interaction is doing serious conversion work because every extra click you require is a percentage of buyers you lose. They basically short-circuited the whole buying process and most people don't even notice it's happening. Star ratings under every flavor. Smart. You're not waiting until the reviews section at the bottom to see social proof. It's right there next to the product at the exact moment you're deciding what to buy. Then there's the "Limited" and "Out of Stock" tags on certain flavors. This is a psychological move that a lot of brands either don't use or use badly. When you see Shirley Temple is sold out your brain immediately thinks this must be good enough that people are actually buying it. And now you're looking at everything else thinking you better grab it before it's gone too. 3) The retention play At this point you haven't bought yet and they already know some people won't on the first visit. So right here they drop the rewards program section. Trade your email for perks and points. They're not letting you leave empty handed. Either you buy today or you give them your email so they can bring you back. Both outcomes work for them. Then comes the subscription nudge. 15% off. Free shipping. Cancel anytime. Three objections handled in one sentence. 1. Too expensive? 15% off. 2. Annoying to reorder? Free shipping straight to your door. 3. Scared of being locked in? Cancel whenever you want. That's a complete objection removal stack built into what looks like a simple banner. The people who weren't ready to buy a 12-pack today are looking at that and doing the math. 4) The press section Bloomberg. Forbes. BuzzFeed. Mindbody. This section exists for one reason. You clicked an ad from a brand you'd maybe seen once or twice before. You don't fully trust them yet. These logos close that gap in about half a second. It's institutional validation. You don't need to read the articles. Just seeing the logos tells your brain people with real credibility have looked at this and thought it was worth covering. Background behind this section is a high-res macro shot of condensation on the can. Cold. Refreshing. Premium. Even the section design is doing sensory work. 5) The overall lesson What Olipop figured out is that a landing page for Facebook traffic has one job. Close the trust gap between the ad and the purchase as fast as possible without losing the energy the ad created. Every section of this page does exactly that. Sensory hook gets you in. Category positioning tells you what it is. Carousel with inline add to cart removes friction. Social proof and scarcity show demand. Subscription offer removes price and convenience objections. Press section provides institutional trust. By the time you hit the footer you either already bought or you gave them your email. That's not a landing page. That's a conversion machine. If your page isn't doing all of this right now, that's where your revenue is leaking. Not in the ads. In what happens after the click. DM me ‘FUNNEL’ and I'll show you exactly how to build something like this for your brand.
0:45

Just pulled up Olipop's landing page after seeing their ads everywhere lately and I need to break this down because this is one of the cleaner DTC pages I've seen in a while. Here's what's actually happening when you land on this page and why it converts cold Facebook traffic better than 90% of ecom brands right now: 1) The first 3 seconds Before you read a single word, there's a video of the product being poured, fizzing, bubbling and condensation on the can with no voiceover or text overlay. Your brain processes that faster than any headline ever could. You can almost hear the fizz. That's intentional. They're triggering a sensory response before your logical brain even wakes up. Then the headline hits. "A New Kind of Soda." Now that's a category repositioning. They're not saying "healthy soda" or "better soda." They're saying the entire category you grew up with needs a new version and this is it. Sub-headline says high fiber, less sugar. Targets exactly the person who clicked the health-focused ad on Instagram. Message match is perfect. The person who clicked the ad lands here and immediately feels like the page was made for them. 2) The product carousel Most brands mess this up by showing you the product and making you go through three more pages to add it to your cart. Olipop lets you hover over any flavor and an "Add 12 Pack" button appears right there. One click. Done. You never leave the homepage. That little micro-interaction is doing serious conversion work because every extra click you require is a percentage of buyers you lose. They basically short-circuited the whole buying process and most people don't even notice it's happening. Star ratings under every flavor. Smart. You're not waiting until the reviews section at the bottom to see social proof. It's right there next to the product at the exact moment you're deciding what to buy. Then there's the "Limited" and "Out of Stock" tags on certain flavors. This is a psychological move that a lot of brands either don't use or use badly. When you see Shirley Temple is sold out your brain immediately thinks this must be good enough that people are actually buying it. And now you're looking at everything else thinking you better grab it before it's gone too. 3) The retention play At this point you haven't bought yet and they already know some people won't on the first visit. So right here they drop the rewards program section. Trade your email for perks and points. They're not letting you leave empty handed. Either you buy today or you give them your email so they can bring you back. Both outcomes work for them. Then comes the subscription nudge. 15% off. Free shipping. Cancel anytime. Three objections handled in one sentence. 1. Too expensive? 15% off. 2. Annoying to reorder? Free shipping straight to your door. 3. Scared of being locked in? Cancel whenever you want. That's a complete objection removal stack built into what looks like a simple banner. The people who weren't ready to buy a 12-pack today are looking at that and doing the math. 4) The press section Bloomberg. Forbes. BuzzFeed. Mindbody. This section exists for one reason. You clicked an ad from a brand you'd maybe seen once or twice before. You don't fully trust them yet. These logos close that gap in about half a second. It's institutional validation. You don't need to read the articles. Just seeing the logos tells your brain people with real credibility have looked at this and thought it was worth covering. Background behind this section is a high-res macro shot of condensation on the can. Cold. Refreshing. Premium. Even the section design is doing sensory work. 5) The overall lesson What Olipop figured out is that a landing page for Facebook traffic has one job. Close the trust gap between the ad and the purchase as fast as possible without losing the energy the ad created. Every section of this page does exactly that. Sensory hook gets you in. Category positioning tells you what it is. Carousel with inline add to cart removes friction. Social proof and scarcity show demand. Subscription offer removes price and convenience objections. Press section provides institutional trust. By the time you hit the footer you either already bought or you gave them your email. That's not a landing page. That's a conversion machine. If your page isn't doing all of this right now, that's where your revenue is leaking. Not in the ads. In what happens after the click. DM me ‘FUNNEL’ and I'll show you exactly how to build something like this for your brand.

Nick Theriot

26,389 views • 4 months ago

Security footage from the Eastgate Shopping Center in North Carolina shows the unwavering bond between a Soldier and their Service Dog. The veteran walking through the corridor is David. He's 32 years old with 2 deployments. He was diagnosed with PTSD in 2019 and crowds immediately trigger anxiety attacks. The German Shepherd walking beside him is 5 yr old Atlas. David's certified service animal for three years. David told a local news outlet he had driven to the mall to pick up a prescription from the pharmacy near the east entrance. He knew it was a Saturday. He knew it would be crowded. He thought he could manage it. "About halfway down the main corridor I could feel it starting," David explained. "Heart rate going up. Breathing getting shallow. I was scanning every face. It's like my brain just shifts into a different mode and I can't pull it back manually." The security footage shows David walking at a slightly faster pace than normal. His posture tighter. Atlas is right beside him, matching his stride. Then Atlas stops. He sits down directly in David's path. Squarely. Calmly. Like he'd planned it. David takes one more step and nearly stumbles over Atlas. He looks down. Atlas looks up. Direct, steady eye contact. Unwavering. The kind of focus that asks for nothing except full attention in return. David stopped. The crowd parted around them. People kept moving. Nobody stopped. Just two figures standing still in the middle of a busy corridor — a man and his dog looking at each other. David knelt down. Put both hands on either side of Atlas's face. You can hear David talking to Atlas, calming himself by acting like he's calming the dog. He told us: "When Atlas locks eyes with me like that, it forces my whole nervous system to find something to attach to that isn't a threat. He becomes the only thing in the room. And once he's the only thing in the room, I can breathe again." They stayed there for about two minutes. Then Atlas stood up. Resumed walking. Slower this time. And David walked with him. They picked up the prescription. Made it back to the car. David posted the security footage two weeks later with permission slip from the mall. He wanted people to understand what service animals actually do in real time — not in training environments, not in demonstrations, but in the middle of an ordinary Saturday when everything quietly starts to fall apart. "Atlas didn't wait for me to ask for help," David said. "He saw what was coming before I could name it. And he put himself between me and it." Sometimes the bravest thing a guardian does is simply refuse to move. God bless our soldiers and the service dogs who walk beside them...always. 🇺🇸
0:30

Security footage from the Eastgate Shopping Center in North Carolina shows the unwavering bond between a Soldier and their Service Dog. The veteran walking through the corridor is David. He's 32 years old with 2 deployments. He was diagnosed with PTSD in 2019 and crowds immediately trigger anxiety attacks. The German Shepherd walking beside him is 5 yr old Atlas. David's certified service animal for three years. David told a local news outlet he had driven to the mall to pick up a prescription from the pharmacy near the east entrance. He knew it was a Saturday. He knew it would be crowded. He thought he could manage it. "About halfway down the main corridor I could feel it starting," David explained. "Heart rate going up. Breathing getting shallow. I was scanning every face. It's like my brain just shifts into a different mode and I can't pull it back manually." The security footage shows David walking at a slightly faster pace than normal. His posture tighter. Atlas is right beside him, matching his stride. Then Atlas stops. He sits down directly in David's path. Squarely. Calmly. Like he'd planned it. David takes one more step and nearly stumbles over Atlas. He looks down. Atlas looks up. Direct, steady eye contact. Unwavering. The kind of focus that asks for nothing except full attention in return. David stopped. The crowd parted around them. People kept moving. Nobody stopped. Just two figures standing still in the middle of a busy corridor — a man and his dog looking at each other. David knelt down. Put both hands on either side of Atlas's face. You can hear David talking to Atlas, calming himself by acting like he's calming the dog. He told us: "When Atlas locks eyes with me like that, it forces my whole nervous system to find something to attach to that isn't a threat. He becomes the only thing in the room. And once he's the only thing in the room, I can breathe again." They stayed there for about two minutes. Then Atlas stood up. Resumed walking. Slower this time. And David walked with him. They picked up the prescription. Made it back to the car. David posted the security footage two weeks later with permission slip from the mall. He wanted people to understand what service animals actually do in real time — not in training environments, not in demonstrations, but in the middle of an ordinary Saturday when everything quietly starts to fall apart. "Atlas didn't wait for me to ask for help," David said. "He saw what was coming before I could name it. And he put himself between me and it." Sometimes the bravest thing a guardian does is simply refuse to move. God bless our soldiers and the service dogs who walk beside them...always. 🇺🇸

Patriot🇺🇸Newswire

1,106,604 views • 3 months ago

After Trump kidnapped Maduro on behalf of Pax Judaica, he turned his attention elsewhere. To Greenland. Trump has announced that they're considering using military force to take over Greenland. But surely his interest in Greenland is only about the interests of US Empire and not that of the transnational empire being developed by the Zionists? Think again. The entire power of the US military is now at the disposal of individual Zionist Oligarchs for whatever pet project they want. In this case the genocidal Jewish supremacist is Ronald Lauder. What is Lauder’s connection to Greenland? Here is Danish social scientist Steven N. Højlund (in the video below with extracts pasted here to). While Trump threatens to seize Greenland by force, a quieter takeover is already underway. And it's happening through the same billionaire who planted the idea in Trump's head Ronald Lauder. The same Lauder who convinced Trump to buy Greenland back in 2017, isn't just talking anymore. He's buying his way in, through a Delaware registered company called Greenland Development Partners. Lauder has quietly purchased stakes in strategic Greenlandic companies. But here's what nobody's reporting. His business partners in Greenland are some of Greenland's most influential people with very, very close ties to Greenland's foreign minister. That's the same person negotiating Greenland's response to Trump's threats. This is economic infiltration disguised as investment and I'm going to show you exactly how it works... This is the story the media isn't telling. Let me introduce you to Greenland Development Partners. It's a Delaware registered investment consortium. And if that sounds deliberately obscure, that's because it is. Delaware corporations are famous for one thing and that's opacity. Delaware is the shell company's capital of America where you can hide ownership structures and avoid scrutiny. According to Danish newspaper Politken's investigation, Lauder is a key participant in this consortium. And the consortium has bought stakes in two Greenlandic companies. One of these companies is called Greenland Water Bank: and it's owned by two Greenlandic businessmen, Svend Hardenberg and Jørgen Wæver Johansen. Hardenberg is a former top civil servant and top adviser to the prime minister of Greenland until he got fired recently. He was also the director of Greenland's National Energy Company. In other words, he knows the system inside and out. But Johansen is far more interesting. Johansen is a former minister in several Greenlandic governments and he currently chairs the governing Siumut party in Nuuk, Greenland's capital. Siumut is one of the four parties in Greenland's current coalition government. But that's not the real kicker. His wife is Vivian Motzfeldt, the foreign minister of Greenland. That's the person responsible for handling foreign relations, including relations with the United States. Just take a moment and think about what that means. Ronald Lauder, Trump's friend and adviser on Greenland, is now in business with the husband of Greenland's foreign minister. This isn't just investment. This is influence buying at the very highest level. And I will explain why that is the case. The company Greenland Water Bank, it sounds small and innocent, and it really is. In fact, in 2024, the company's accounts showed minimum staffing costs of only $5,500 and a modest financial loss. In other words, this is a very small company. Greenland Water Bank bottles water from the Lyngmark Spring [near the town of Qeqertarsuaq on Disko Island]…They sell the water locally in the brand name. Until 2024, the company was fully owned by Hardenberg and Wæver Hansen. Then they sold part of their shares to Lauder’s investor group. Now here's what Hardenberg told the Danish newspaper Politiken about why they took Lauder’s investment. The investment is not the most important thing for us, but rather gaining better access to the luxury market where our water should be a natural part. When they tested the water, the conclusion was that our water was the best in the world. It is on the basis of that that they became interested in participating in the development of our company. So you could say Lauder's pitch is very simple. We'll help you sell premium Greenlandic water to the American luxury market. But what did Lauder get in return? Why would one of the world's richest men invest in this tiny company in Greenland? Is it the pure water in bottles that he is interested in or is it something else? The two founders of the company weren't able to attract any other investors since the company started in 2016 until Lauder showed up. Personally, I can only see one thing Lauder gets out of this and that's a conflict of Interest pressure point and a foothold into Greenland's top elite. Direct business relationships with politically connected Greenlanders. Think about it. Sums of invested funds can now flow very easily to Svend and Jørgen through Greenland Water Bank. It could flow directly as large salaries or bonuses or it can be in the form of a business trip, a fancy office, luxury boats or cars. All of course in the name of the company paid by invested money from Lauder. The possibilities for enriching Svend and Jørgen are endless and so is the money that Lauder has at his disposal. $10 million is nothing for Lauder who is good for 5 billion USD. But being in business together can also be a pressure point. An investor can sue you and make your life a living hell, especially if the pockets are very deep and you can buy every lawyer and PR person to spin stories and drag people through the mud. That's the negative pressure angle that this co-operation can also lead to. But the most controversial part is still the connection to the active foreign minister of Greenland, Vivian Motzfeldt. The foreign minister previously served on the board of Greenland Water Bank, but she must have felt that that would have been too obvious a conflict of interest. But the problem is still there. It's the family connection to her husband that makes up the problem in the company that's now partially owned by Trump's friend, who also happens to be the brain behind Trump's acquisition plans. In other words, if Ronald Lauder decides to invest a large sum in Greenland water bank and also pay out a huge bonus to Yan, this money will also enrich Vivian. If it was almost any other investor in the entire world, it wouldn't have been a problem. ____ The Zionists appear to be up to something more ambitious than any previous state or movement in the modern period. If Venezuela and Greenland are both Pax Judaica plays via Singer and Lauder, which Jewish supremacist oligarch is responsible for Canada, the Horn of Africa/Yemen or elsewhere? This is much bigger than just deporting Palestinians, or even resource-grabbing. #DismantleZionism
6:35

After Trump kidnapped Maduro on behalf of Pax Judaica, he turned his attention elsewhere. To Greenland. Trump has announced that they're considering using military force to take over Greenland. But surely his interest in Greenland is only about the interests of US Empire and not that of the transnational empire being developed by the Zionists? Think again. The entire power of the US military is now at the disposal of individual Zionist Oligarchs for whatever pet project they want. In this case the genocidal Jewish supremacist is Ronald Lauder. What is Lauder’s connection to Greenland? Here is Danish social scientist Steven N. Højlund (in the video below with extracts pasted here to). While Trump threatens to seize Greenland by force, a quieter takeover is already underway. And it's happening through the same billionaire who planted the idea in Trump's head Ronald Lauder. The same Lauder who convinced Trump to buy Greenland back in 2017, isn't just talking anymore. He's buying his way in, through a Delaware registered company called Greenland Development Partners. Lauder has quietly purchased stakes in strategic Greenlandic companies. But here's what nobody's reporting. His business partners in Greenland are some of Greenland's most influential people with very, very close ties to Greenland's foreign minister. That's the same person negotiating Greenland's response to Trump's threats. This is economic infiltration disguised as investment and I'm going to show you exactly how it works... This is the story the media isn't telling. Let me introduce you to Greenland Development Partners. It's a Delaware registered investment consortium. And if that sounds deliberately obscure, that's because it is. Delaware corporations are famous for one thing and that's opacity. Delaware is the shell company's capital of America where you can hide ownership structures and avoid scrutiny. According to Danish newspaper Politken's investigation, Lauder is a key participant in this consortium. And the consortium has bought stakes in two Greenlandic companies. One of these companies is called Greenland Water Bank: and it's owned by two Greenlandic businessmen, Svend Hardenberg and Jørgen Wæver Johansen. Hardenberg is a former top civil servant and top adviser to the prime minister of Greenland until he got fired recently. He was also the director of Greenland's National Energy Company. In other words, he knows the system inside and out. But Johansen is far more interesting. Johansen is a former minister in several Greenlandic governments and he currently chairs the governing Siumut party in Nuuk, Greenland's capital. Siumut is one of the four parties in Greenland's current coalition government. But that's not the real kicker. His wife is Vivian Motzfeldt, the foreign minister of Greenland. That's the person responsible for handling foreign relations, including relations with the United States. Just take a moment and think about what that means. Ronald Lauder, Trump's friend and adviser on Greenland, is now in business with the husband of Greenland's foreign minister. This isn't just investment. This is influence buying at the very highest level. And I will explain why that is the case. The company Greenland Water Bank, it sounds small and innocent, and it really is. In fact, in 2024, the company's accounts showed minimum staffing costs of only $5,500 and a modest financial loss. In other words, this is a very small company. Greenland Water Bank bottles water from the Lyngmark Spring [near the town of Qeqertarsuaq on Disko Island]…They sell the water locally in the brand name. Until 2024, the company was fully owned by Hardenberg and Wæver Hansen. Then they sold part of their shares to Lauder’s investor group. Now here's what Hardenberg told the Danish newspaper Politiken about why they took Lauder’s investment. The investment is not the most important thing for us, but rather gaining better access to the luxury market where our water should be a natural part. When they tested the water, the conclusion was that our water was the best in the world. It is on the basis of that that they became interested in participating in the development of our company. So you could say Lauder's pitch is very simple. We'll help you sell premium Greenlandic water to the American luxury market. But what did Lauder get in return? Why would one of the world's richest men invest in this tiny company in Greenland? Is it the pure water in bottles that he is interested in or is it something else? The two founders of the company weren't able to attract any other investors since the company started in 2016 until Lauder showed up. Personally, I can only see one thing Lauder gets out of this and that's a conflict of Interest pressure point and a foothold into Greenland's top elite. Direct business relationships with politically connected Greenlanders. Think about it. Sums of invested funds can now flow very easily to Svend and Jørgen through Greenland Water Bank. It could flow directly as large salaries or bonuses or it can be in the form of a business trip, a fancy office, luxury boats or cars. All of course in the name of the company paid by invested money from Lauder. The possibilities for enriching Svend and Jørgen are endless and so is the money that Lauder has at his disposal. $10 million is nothing for Lauder who is good for 5 billion USD. But being in business together can also be a pressure point. An investor can sue you and make your life a living hell, especially if the pockets are very deep and you can buy every lawyer and PR person to spin stories and drag people through the mud. That's the negative pressure angle that this co-operation can also lead to. But the most controversial part is still the connection to the active foreign minister of Greenland, Vivian Motzfeldt. The foreign minister previously served on the board of Greenland Water Bank, but she must have felt that that would have been too obvious a conflict of interest. But the problem is still there. It's the family connection to her husband that makes up the problem in the company that's now partially owned by Trump's friend, who also happens to be the brain behind Trump's acquisition plans. In other words, if Ronald Lauder decides to invest a large sum in Greenland water bank and also pay out a huge bonus to Yan, this money will also enrich Vivian. If it was almost any other investor in the entire world, it wouldn't have been a problem. ____ The Zionists appear to be up to something more ambitious than any previous state or movement in the modern period. If Venezuela and Greenland are both Pax Judaica plays via Singer and Lauder, which Jewish supremacist oligarch is responsible for Canada, the Horn of Africa/Yemen or elsewhere? This is much bigger than just deporting Palestinians, or even resource-grabbing. #DismantleZionism

David Miller

188,501 views • 6 months ago

Zack Polanski and Judi Love on The Last Leg ZP, "These are tricky decisions for people in poverty, disabled, unemployed. When are there going to be tricky decisions for multimillionaires and billionaires. And actually tax the rich" JL, "Show me a man that's come on live TV to get some votes.. I want the truth, nothing but the truth" Adam Hills, "With Labour, Reform UK and the Tories all attacking the disabled, how would The Greens do things differently?" ZP, "Nothing about us without us. Disabled people should be at the centre of the policy about disabled people. Better housing, better transport, its better for everyone including disabled people" GK Barry, "Who would you cast as climate change in a movie?" ZP, "Nigel Farage, he's full of hot air" Adam Hills, "Why is The Green party against nuclear energy" ZP, "Sizewell C has taken 27 years to build, it's like creating the fax machine right now. We need to invest in renewable, wind and solar" Adam Hills, "Young people feel disconnected from politics" ZP, "Stop saying we're inspired by young people, let's help them get into positions of power, invest in young people, give them the resources, confidence and skills, to represent themselves" Adam Hills, "Green party stance on NATO?" ZP, "Trump is an unreliable ally. He wants to annex Greenland. I want peace and diplomacy working with our European neighbours" Adam Hills, "Do penguins have knees?" ZP, "If they choose to, however they identify" Adam Hills, "Has Zack ever smoked green, if so was it organic?" ZP, "We need to legalise and regulate, we shouldn't be putting people in prison for cannabis" Alex Brooker, "You said you could make women's boobs bigger through hypnotherapy.. You apologised.. How are you with hands?" ZP, "It's funny because in the green room you were talking about other body parts" Adam Hills, "Your thoughts on COP30?" ZP, "We need to show global leadership. We've got a Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, who says he wants the greenest government ever, but he's still drilling for oil and gas, opening new airports. We also need to recognise that the global south, and countries like Jamaica that have just suffered a hurricane, we have a contribution to that. We need to be taxing the fossil fuel companies. And keep fossil fuels in the ground" JL, "They should be teaching children how to spot a fake politician" ZP, "Rachel Reeves did a course called PPE, as did Jeremy Hunt, and Ed Balls. I think we need to rename it as P*ss Poor Economics" *I have friends who read PPE at Oxford, thankfully they're far more literate than Reeves* Adam Hills, "People compare you to Mamdani" ZP, "What people get wrong with Zohran, is that it's not just the social media, it's the message: lowering bills, taxing billionaires and making a city everyone can afford to live in. I want to make a country we can all afford to live in" JL, "Wow.. He's got the chat, hasn't he. Damm brother, where are you from, the south?" ZP & JL groove 🕺💃 👏
5:20

Zack Polanski and Judi Love on The Last Leg ZP, "These are tricky decisions for people in poverty, disabled, unemployed. When are there going to be tricky decisions for multimillionaires and billionaires. And actually tax the rich" JL, "Show me a man that's come on live TV to get some votes.. I want the truth, nothing but the truth" Adam Hills, "With Labour, Reform UK and the Tories all attacking the disabled, how would The Greens do things differently?" ZP, "Nothing about us without us. Disabled people should be at the centre of the policy about disabled people. Better housing, better transport, its better for everyone including disabled people" GK Barry, "Who would you cast as climate change in a movie?" ZP, "Nigel Farage, he's full of hot air" Adam Hills, "Why is The Green party against nuclear energy" ZP, "Sizewell C has taken 27 years to build, it's like creating the fax machine right now. We need to invest in renewable, wind and solar" Adam Hills, "Young people feel disconnected from politics" ZP, "Stop saying we're inspired by young people, let's help them get into positions of power, invest in young people, give them the resources, confidence and skills, to represent themselves" Adam Hills, "Green party stance on NATO?" ZP, "Trump is an unreliable ally. He wants to annex Greenland. I want peace and diplomacy working with our European neighbours" Adam Hills, "Do penguins have knees?" ZP, "If they choose to, however they identify" Adam Hills, "Has Zack ever smoked green, if so was it organic?" ZP, "We need to legalise and regulate, we shouldn't be putting people in prison for cannabis" Alex Brooker, "You said you could make women's boobs bigger through hypnotherapy.. You apologised.. How are you with hands?" ZP, "It's funny because in the green room you were talking about other body parts" Adam Hills, "Your thoughts on COP30?" ZP, "We need to show global leadership. We've got a Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, who says he wants the greenest government ever, but he's still drilling for oil and gas, opening new airports. We also need to recognise that the global south, and countries like Jamaica that have just suffered a hurricane, we have a contribution to that. We need to be taxing the fossil fuel companies. And keep fossil fuels in the ground" JL, "They should be teaching children how to spot a fake politician" ZP, "Rachel Reeves did a course called PPE, as did Jeremy Hunt, and Ed Balls. I think we need to rename it as P*ss Poor Economics" *I have friends who read PPE at Oxford, thankfully they're far more literate than Reeves* Adam Hills, "People compare you to Mamdani" ZP, "What people get wrong with Zohran, is that it's not just the social media, it's the message: lowering bills, taxing billionaires and making a city everyone can afford to live in. I want to make a country we can all afford to live in" JL, "Wow.. He's got the chat, hasn't he. Damm brother, where are you from, the south?" ZP & JL groove 🕺💃 👏

Farrukh

848,060 views • 8 months ago

I’ve been using GPT-5.6 Sol internally for the past two months, I've spent probably 25+ billion tokens. Here’s my review and comparison to Fable 5: > Let's start with the analogy because everyone seems to be giving theirs - GPT-5.6 is likely the last version of the GPT-5 training run series. It's kind of like an athlete at their peak. Through years of experience in the game, they've become the most reliable player and has the highest game IQ. But, there's no more room to grow. Fable on the other hand, being essentially the first version of a new training run, is the first round draft pick rookie. Raw talent mixed with the energy only a young person would have results in some incredible plays we didn't think possible, but also mistakes due to lack of experience. But that rookie will only improve and likely will be better than the veteran ever was because it's a new game and a new era. > GPT-5.6 is genuinely better at long, sustained work. With /goal, I've had it running complex projects for days with almost no intervention. It built a Minecraft-style game, kept adding features and mobs after the core game worked, and only stopped because I stopped the run. I never felt as though I had to jump in and guide it back to the right path. > It keeps finding useful work when you give it a concrete finish line. I had it recreate Excel with a loop. It inspected the real desktop excel app with Computer Use, comparing that against its own build, and closing the gaps. I stopped it after six days after it had built an incredible amount of functionality. > It's faster than other models in two different ways. The raw generation speed is higher, something OpenAI has been putting effort into. But it also takes a shorter path to solutions. It wanders less, changes less code, and generally knows how to get things done directly. In daily use, it feels about 2-3x times faster than Fable. That's my impression, not a controlled benchmark. The difference is large enough that I notice it constantly. > It works well across a wide range of tasks. I use it for one-line edits, quick questions, browser chores, and multi-day builds without changing my prompting style. Speaking of browser control, its the best ever I've used. To the point where I actually use it often. If a task lives on a website, GPT-5.6 usually opens the browser and does it there instead of asking for an API key or forcing everything through the terminal. When I switched back to GPT-5.5, it went straight to the command line even when the browser was clearly the better tool. > And it can handle real browser work, not just toy demos. During a data import, I had it monitor Supabase and resize instances as the load changed. It stayed on the dashboard, adjusted capacity, and checked the result without an API or a custom script. > I also gave it a full Google Workspace migration. It moved Forward Future from to preserved the old aliases, and configured MX, SPF, and DKIM. Before a consequential save, it stopped, explained exactly what would change, and waited for confirmation. > The reasoning setting matters a lot. Light is good for questions and small edits. High and Extra High are the sweet spots for serious work. Ultra usually takes longer than the extra thinking is worth and burns tokens. > I love that 5.6 is split into 3 sizes. Not only can you control speed and cost that way, but you still also have the thinking effort setting for each of them. Very precise controls. I just wish Codex automatically routed my prompts for me. > Its personality is blunt and a little bland. Claude feels warmer and more natural to talk to. GPT-5.6 is more clinical, but I like that for work. It gives me enough explanation and rarely pads the answer. I usually have to ask Fable to explain things more simply and/or more concise. > Its front-end taste has improved, but the default is predictable. Left alone, it turns websites into PowerPoint decks with huge statements and hard section breaks. The good news is that it takes design direction well and can revise without destroying the parts that already work. > It still makes confident mistakes. I asked it to rebuild parts of a system, and it told me the job was finished. Later, I found out it wasn't. Bits of its internal process also leak into the answer occasionally. > Claude Fable is more naturally autonomous on large, open-ended projects. GPT-5.6 is easier to reach for. I don't need to invent a huge project to justify using it. It works just as well for a small edit or browser chore. > GPT-5.6 is also cheaper. Sol costs $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens. Fable costs $10 and $50. Cached input is cheaper too. Still, cost per finished task matters more than cost per token. > GPT-5.6 isn't the best at everything, and it still needs supervision. But it generates faster, wanders less, works at almost any scale, and wastes less of my time. It's the model I have the most confidence in to get the job done right the first time. I put together a full breakdown with all the tests, prompts, and examples on a site. You can read it here:
7:46

I’ve been using GPT-5.6 Sol internally for the past two months, I've spent probably 25+ billion tokens. Here’s my review and comparison to Fable 5: > Let's start with the analogy because everyone seems to be giving theirs - GPT-5.6 is likely the last version of the GPT-5 training run series. It's kind of like an athlete at their peak. Through years of experience in the game, they've become the most reliable player and has the highest game IQ. But, there's no more room to grow. Fable on the other hand, being essentially the first version of a new training run, is the first round draft pick rookie. Raw talent mixed with the energy only a young person would have results in some incredible plays we didn't think possible, but also mistakes due to lack of experience. But that rookie will only improve and likely will be better than the veteran ever was because it's a new game and a new era. > GPT-5.6 is genuinely better at long, sustained work. With /goal, I've had it running complex projects for days with almost no intervention. It built a Minecraft-style game, kept adding features and mobs after the core game worked, and only stopped because I stopped the run. I never felt as though I had to jump in and guide it back to the right path. > It keeps finding useful work when you give it a concrete finish line. I had it recreate Excel with a loop. It inspected the real desktop excel app with Computer Use, comparing that against its own build, and closing the gaps. I stopped it after six days after it had built an incredible amount of functionality. > It's faster than other models in two different ways. The raw generation speed is higher, something OpenAI has been putting effort into. But it also takes a shorter path to solutions. It wanders less, changes less code, and generally knows how to get things done directly. In daily use, it feels about 2-3x times faster than Fable. That's my impression, not a controlled benchmark. The difference is large enough that I notice it constantly. > It works well across a wide range of tasks. I use it for one-line edits, quick questions, browser chores, and multi-day builds without changing my prompting style. Speaking of browser control, its the best ever I've used. To the point where I actually use it often. If a task lives on a website, GPT-5.6 usually opens the browser and does it there instead of asking for an API key or forcing everything through the terminal. When I switched back to GPT-5.5, it went straight to the command line even when the browser was clearly the better tool. > And it can handle real browser work, not just toy demos. During a data import, I had it monitor Supabase and resize instances as the load changed. It stayed on the dashboard, adjusted capacity, and checked the result without an API or a custom script. > I also gave it a full Google Workspace migration. It moved Forward Future from to preserved the old aliases, and configured MX, SPF, and DKIM. Before a consequential save, it stopped, explained exactly what would change, and waited for confirmation. > The reasoning setting matters a lot. Light is good for questions and small edits. High and Extra High are the sweet spots for serious work. Ultra usually takes longer than the extra thinking is worth and burns tokens. > I love that 5.6 is split into 3 sizes. Not only can you control speed and cost that way, but you still also have the thinking effort setting for each of them. Very precise controls. I just wish Codex automatically routed my prompts for me. > Its personality is blunt and a little bland. Claude feels warmer and more natural to talk to. GPT-5.6 is more clinical, but I like that for work. It gives me enough explanation and rarely pads the answer. I usually have to ask Fable to explain things more simply and/or more concise. > Its front-end taste has improved, but the default is predictable. Left alone, it turns websites into PowerPoint decks with huge statements and hard section breaks. The good news is that it takes design direction well and can revise without destroying the parts that already work. > It still makes confident mistakes. I asked it to rebuild parts of a system, and it told me the job was finished. Later, I found out it wasn't. Bits of its internal process also leak into the answer occasionally. > Claude Fable is more naturally autonomous on large, open-ended projects. GPT-5.6 is easier to reach for. I don't need to invent a huge project to justify using it. It works just as well for a small edit or browser chore. > GPT-5.6 is also cheaper. Sol costs $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens. Fable costs $10 and $50. Cached input is cheaper too. Still, cost per finished task matters more than cost per token. > GPT-5.6 isn't the best at everything, and it still needs supervision. But it generates faster, wanders less, works at almost any scale, and wastes less of my time. It's the model I have the most confidence in to get the job done right the first time. I put together a full breakdown with all the tests, prompts, and examples on a site. You can read it here:

Matthew Berman

186,112 views • 13 days ago

One thing I wish I did differently when starting out with my cabinet shop was to leverage outsourcing and subcontractors more. I started my business in a 1-car garage at 24 yrs old. I was young, hungry, and felt I needed to prove a point so I committed to purchasing all the equipment I thought I needed to start a woodworking business. Nearly $200k spent in the first 6 months outfitting a 5,000 sf shop with only $15k coming in. I did have cash saved up so the initial investment did not include taking on a ton of debt. But it was a horrible way to allocate the funds. Unlike many trades-based business, it is uncommon to be able to rent equipment for a cabinet shop so I went all in on my own. However, you can 100% rent time on other shop's machines, buy out cabinet doors and drawer boxes, sub out finishing to a painter, sub out delivery, and install, etc. I did none of this when I started out. I bought all the equipment, manufactured all of the components, did all of the finishing, self-performed all deliveries, and did install myself. It was a total grind and it made managing cashflow a nightmare. I ended up becoming a shop other woodworkers paid to rent machine time and that covered a good portion of my bills years 1 & 2. It wasn't until 5 years in that I was beaten down enough by poor cashflow that I started to sub out delivery and installs. We still manufactured all components and did finishing in house as we were focused on high quality and customization and had tooled up in the process of settling in this niche. Which didn't make it economical to outsource with the equipment and staff I had. I don't regret doing things this way because I gained 20 years of experience in 10 years but it certainly made scaling a custom cabinet business 10x more difficult. Sure, the technical aspect of engineering, manufacturing, and installation had a steep learning curve but I loved every minute of that learning curve. The constant pressure that clouded my judgement and ultimately led to burnout was a poor cash conversion cycle and margin compression from equipment loans and overhead. I feel fortunate to have been able to put myself through the ringer for a decade and gained a ton of experience that I can now apply to the next venture but I sure am happy to have been able to exit that business financially unscathed. It was a nail biter nearly every day. The video below inspired this reflection and I think it's a great message to those just starting out with any business, not just excavating or the trades.
2:51

One thing I wish I did differently when starting out with my cabinet shop was to leverage outsourcing and subcontractors more. I started my business in a 1-car garage at 24 yrs old. I was young, hungry, and felt I needed to prove a point so I committed to purchasing all the equipment I thought I needed to start a woodworking business. Nearly $200k spent in the first 6 months outfitting a 5,000 sf shop with only $15k coming in. I did have cash saved up so the initial investment did not include taking on a ton of debt. But it was a horrible way to allocate the funds. Unlike many trades-based business, it is uncommon to be able to rent equipment for a cabinet shop so I went all in on my own. However, you can 100% rent time on other shop's machines, buy out cabinet doors and drawer boxes, sub out finishing to a painter, sub out delivery, and install, etc. I did none of this when I started out. I bought all the equipment, manufactured all of the components, did all of the finishing, self-performed all deliveries, and did install myself. It was a total grind and it made managing cashflow a nightmare. I ended up becoming a shop other woodworkers paid to rent machine time and that covered a good portion of my bills years 1 & 2. It wasn't until 5 years in that I was beaten down enough by poor cashflow that I started to sub out delivery and installs. We still manufactured all components and did finishing in house as we were focused on high quality and customization and had tooled up in the process of settling in this niche. Which didn't make it economical to outsource with the equipment and staff I had. I don't regret doing things this way because I gained 20 years of experience in 10 years but it certainly made scaling a custom cabinet business 10x more difficult. Sure, the technical aspect of engineering, manufacturing, and installation had a steep learning curve but I loved every minute of that learning curve. The constant pressure that clouded my judgement and ultimately led to burnout was a poor cash conversion cycle and margin compression from equipment loans and overhead. I feel fortunate to have been able to put myself through the ringer for a decade and gained a ton of experience that I can now apply to the next venture but I sure am happy to have been able to exit that business financially unscathed. It was a nail biter nearly every day. The video below inspired this reflection and I think it's a great message to those just starting out with any business, not just excavating or the trades.

Alex Forbes

42,417 views • 5 months ago

🔥HYPER-CRUCIAL INSIGHT🔥 "Fauci was not in charge...He was the public relations face of the policy...The government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council...and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world." (1/5) Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (Brownstone Institute) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (Independent Medical Alliance) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (Dr. Kat Lindley) how former NIAID head Anthony Fauci **was not in any way in charge of COVID policy.** Instead, Lerman notes that the National Security Council was in charge of COVID policy. While Lerman notes that Fauci is indeed "a terrible person" who should be "on trial," she says that "that's [not] where we should be focusing all of our attention." "The biodefense global public–partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge," Lerman says. "So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear: Fauci was not in charge. Please get that out of your mind. We can prosecute him. We can blame him for a lot of things. [But] he didn't make the policy. He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy. He was the public relations face of the policy. He's a terrible person. [And I] would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention." Lerman goes on to discuss Deborah Birx, who was also on the COVID "Task Force." "Deborah Birx...she came [in as] the representative of the national security state...[And] what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council." "And so I just went where my research took me, and, unfortunately, that's where it took me," Lerman adds. "And so I had to go there. And so the National Security Council is defined as the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the President on national security. That's the definition. Now that was the definition before COVID. They changed it. So you have to look at the Wayback Machine to find that definition." Lerman goes on to say: "Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but...it's also pandemics, disasters—anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council. That's scary because...they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do, and in doing that, they've incorporated public health into what they call a biosecurity framework...[and] the one that they came up with is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine. "What that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an anthrax attack, let's say, on a subway system in a big city—you could lock down that city, make sure that it didn't spread further, get rushed treatment to the people in the affected area. It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event...So, like, they would rush the countermeasures. They had EUA, which is emergency use authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to be effective. It's such a big emergency, biowarfare, bioterrorism—you gotta rush it to the people. There might be some collateral damage. We're in a military situation here. Right? So in a military situation, collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of public health. "So the civilian framework of public health disappeared. It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework. And now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is a utterly and completely counter to medicine science and public health."
3:54

🔥HYPER-CRUCIAL INSIGHT🔥 "Fauci was not in charge...He was the public relations face of the policy...The government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council...and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world." (1/5) Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (Brownstone Institute) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (Independent Medical Alliance) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (Dr. Kat Lindley) how former NIAID head Anthony Fauci **was not in any way in charge of COVID policy.** Instead, Lerman notes that the National Security Council was in charge of COVID policy. While Lerman notes that Fauci is indeed "a terrible person" who should be "on trial," she says that "that's [not] where we should be focusing all of our attention." "The biodefense global public–partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge," Lerman says. "So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear: Fauci was not in charge. Please get that out of your mind. We can prosecute him. We can blame him for a lot of things. [But] he didn't make the policy. He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy. He was the public relations face of the policy. He's a terrible person. [And I] would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention." Lerman goes on to discuss Deborah Birx, who was also on the COVID "Task Force." "Deborah Birx...she came [in as] the representative of the national security state...[And] what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council." "And so I just went where my research took me, and, unfortunately, that's where it took me," Lerman adds. "And so I had to go there. And so the National Security Council is defined as the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the President on national security. That's the definition. Now that was the definition before COVID. They changed it. So you have to look at the Wayback Machine to find that definition." Lerman goes on to say: "Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but...it's also pandemics, disasters—anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council. That's scary because...they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do, and in doing that, they've incorporated public health into what they call a biosecurity framework...[and] the one that they came up with is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine. "What that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an anthrax attack, let's say, on a subway system in a big city—you could lock down that city, make sure that it didn't spread further, get rushed treatment to the people in the affected area. It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event...So, like, they would rush the countermeasures. They had EUA, which is emergency use authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to be effective. It's such a big emergency, biowarfare, bioterrorism—you gotta rush it to the people. There might be some collateral damage. We're in a military situation here. Right? So in a military situation, collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of public health. "So the civilian framework of public health disappeared. It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework. And now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is a utterly and completely counter to medicine science and public health."

Sense Receptor

41,169 views • 1 year ago

Boom!! 🚨🚨🚨 Dr. Mike Yeadon's address to the Members of UK Parliament (4 December 2023) ---------------------------------------------- Hello. My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist and biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously, a former vice president at Pfizer, left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of Respiratory research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept. In the ten years after leaving Pfizer, I've worked as an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded Led and sold my own biotech Ziarco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes magazine. I think it was Converting Pfizer Discards into Gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member. So three years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry. I'm going to tell you that the design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people, and I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there. By luck, it's in there because people chose it to be in there and they intended certain things to flow from their choices. But just very briefly, you should know, I hope there has not been a pandemic. Denis Rancourt's data shows that the all cause mortality evidence data did not increase at all in the run up to the Declaration. Fraudulently by who? Of a pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. An inappropriate fraudulent PCR test was used to give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't. There were all normal diseases. And then what happened was in three different ways. People were treated badly through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation. Briefly, mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes, many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants which led to their deaths. My PhD was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied life saving antibiotics and died of bacterial pneumonia. There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our savior. Two things, as I say. First, there's no pandemic, so you certainly don't need an experimental, rushed medical intervention. But secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you it's absolutely impossible to invent, test, clinically, evaluate and manufacture and then launch on global scale a complex biomedical product. It's absolutely impossible. It's not as close, it's years wrong. The fastest record price of this was six years. And friends of mine who've worked all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me the methods development alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is you think was done, I am telling you, there was not the development of a proper medical product. What I think happened was the advancement of materials that are intentionally toxic. And then they were sketchily, advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, with the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died. I don't have time today to explain what I think they're going to do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this. So, like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic? Well, let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself, but when it's infected or detects a cancer, it goes to war. And the answer is, it distinguishes self things that are meant to be inside you from non self, from foreign things that are not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self foreign things. If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein from a foreign organism, your body will detect that. And every single cell that takes up that material and expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system. Now, if you think that's advanced immunology, let me put you right. It's in the first chapter. Distinguishing self from non self is one of the foremost lessons of immunology. And every single person involved in the train of delivery of these materials to doctor's hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury. Then on top of that, it's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein, you're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood, for example, they start to coagulate, it clots. Those materials are biological toxins. So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins. That means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if you should release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get one or other of several neurological defects. And of course, it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor, and there are many others. But let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated it's normal to formulate drugs. These are formulated in fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all around your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there. And that was the entire point of it. So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes. And they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body, including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body. But here's the thing. Ten years ago, there were papers published, and it was well established and well known in the industry that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers deposit their cargo, preferentially in the ovaries, and that was confirmed with the pfizer products in an animal experiment performed for the Japanese regulators. So, by design, these agents cause an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well understood biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they deposited their cargoes, preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls. So if you think that's by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind, anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood what they were designing and manufacturing. So I think, having heard what I've just said, that there was no pandemic and the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think five and a half billion people with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17 million of whom have died so far. What do you think is happening and what do you think your role as an individual is in stopping this crime? On. Thank you for listening. -------------------------------------------- Please note that this will likely be "community noted" and Dr. Mike Yeadon may be branded as "Antivaxxer" because (as of 12 Dec 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.
9:35

Boom!! 🚨🚨🚨 Dr. Mike Yeadon's address to the Members of UK Parliament (4 December 2023) ---------------------------------------------- Hello. My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist and biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously, a former vice president at Pfizer, left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of Respiratory research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept. In the ten years after leaving Pfizer, I've worked as an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded Led and sold my own biotech Ziarco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes magazine. I think it was Converting Pfizer Discards into Gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member. So three years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry. I'm going to tell you that the design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people, and I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there. By luck, it's in there because people chose it to be in there and they intended certain things to flow from their choices. But just very briefly, you should know, I hope there has not been a pandemic. Denis Rancourt's data shows that the all cause mortality evidence data did not increase at all in the run up to the Declaration. Fraudulently by who? Of a pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. An inappropriate fraudulent PCR test was used to give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't. There were all normal diseases. And then what happened was in three different ways. People were treated badly through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation. Briefly, mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes, many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants which led to their deaths. My PhD was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied life saving antibiotics and died of bacterial pneumonia. There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our savior. Two things, as I say. First, there's no pandemic, so you certainly don't need an experimental, rushed medical intervention. But secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you it's absolutely impossible to invent, test, clinically, evaluate and manufacture and then launch on global scale a complex biomedical product. It's absolutely impossible. It's not as close, it's years wrong. The fastest record price of this was six years. And friends of mine who've worked all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me the methods development alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is you think was done, I am telling you, there was not the development of a proper medical product. What I think happened was the advancement of materials that are intentionally toxic. And then they were sketchily, advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, with the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died. I don't have time today to explain what I think they're going to do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this. So, like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic? Well, let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself, but when it's infected or detects a cancer, it goes to war. And the answer is, it distinguishes self things that are meant to be inside you from non self, from foreign things that are not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self foreign things. If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein from a foreign organism, your body will detect that. And every single cell that takes up that material and expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system. Now, if you think that's advanced immunology, let me put you right. It's in the first chapter. Distinguishing self from non self is one of the foremost lessons of immunology. And every single person involved in the train of delivery of these materials to doctor's hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury. Then on top of that, it's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein, you're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood, for example, they start to coagulate, it clots. Those materials are biological toxins. So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins. That means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if you should release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get one or other of several neurological defects. And of course, it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor, and there are many others. But let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated it's normal to formulate drugs. These are formulated in fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all around your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there. And that was the entire point of it. So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes. And they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body, including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body. But here's the thing. Ten years ago, there were papers published, and it was well established and well known in the industry that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers deposit their cargo, preferentially in the ovaries, and that was confirmed with the pfizer products in an animal experiment performed for the Japanese regulators. So, by design, these agents cause an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well understood biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they deposited their cargoes, preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls. So if you think that's by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind, anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood what they were designing and manufacturing. So I think, having heard what I've just said, that there was no pandemic and the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think five and a half billion people with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17 million of whom have died so far. What do you think is happening and what do you think your role as an individual is in stopping this crime? On. Thank you for listening. -------------------------------------------- Please note that this will likely be "community noted" and Dr. Mike Yeadon may be branded as "Antivaxxer" because (as of 12 Dec 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.

aussie17

609,232 views • 2 years ago

New episode: "How Elon Works" This episode covers the insanely valuable company-building principles of Elon Musk A few notes from the episode: 1. The mission comes first. 2. Retreat is not an option. 3. A maniacal sense of urgency is our operating principle. 4. Product design should be driven by engineers. 5. You should not separate engineering from product design. 6. Having separate design and production departments is bullshit. Keep everything together and feedback immediate. 7. The leader should be on the front lines. You should be a battlefield general. 8. "If they see the general out on the battlefield, the troops are going to be motivated. Wherever Napoleon was, that's where his armies would do best." 9. Apply The Algorithm constantly. (1) Question every requirement. (2) Delete any part of the process you can. (3) Simplify and optimize. (4) Accelerate cycle time. (5) Automate. 10. Repetition is persuasive. "I became a broken record on the algorithm. I think it's helpful to say it to an annoying degree." 11. You should go ultra-hardcore on deletion and simplification. 12. Camaraderie is dangerous. It makes it hard for people to challenge each other’s work. (Refer to point #1) 13. Never ask your troops to do something you wouldn’t do. 14. Hire for attitude. Skills can be taught. Attitude changes require a brain transplant. 15. Good attitude = A desire to work maniacally hard. 16. The only rules are the ones dictated by the laws of physics. Everything else is a recommendation. 17. Keep your entire company committed to a common goal. 18. If things aren’t going well, throw away the existing design, start from first principles, question every requirement based on fundamental physics. 19. Find the limit. You want to delete as much as possible and you can’t do that unless you find the limit. 20. If you aren’t adding back at least 10% of the things you deleted, then you didn’t delete enough. 21. Maintain control. Avoid joint ventures. Eliminate middlemen. 22. Have a relentless dedication to questioning every requirement. 23. No work about work, just work. 24. Go to the problem. Get on the plane. Fly to the source. Go to the exact location in the factory. Go to the problem and stay there until it's resolved. 25. The best part is no part. 26. Be wired for war. 27. Do not fear losing. It hurts the first 50 times but then you’ll be able to play with less emotion. You will take more risks. 28. Stay heads down focused on doing useful things for civilization. 29. When something is important and has to be done quickly, have meetings every 24 hours to run the algorithm and check on the previous days progress. You'll be shocked at how fast this speeds things up. 30. Life needs to be interesting and edgy. 31. Delete, delete, delete, delete. There are 100 more ideas in the episode. I hope you listen to it. 30 years of Elon’s career + 60 hours of reading and research and me just absolutely ripping through idea after idea at 2x speed for 90 minutes. It will be hard to find a better use of time.
1:33:02

New episode: "How Elon Works" This episode covers the insanely valuable company-building principles of Elon Musk A few notes from the episode: 1. The mission comes first. 2. Retreat is not an option. 3. A maniacal sense of urgency is our operating principle. 4. Product design should be driven by engineers. 5. You should not separate engineering from product design. 6. Having separate design and production departments is bullshit. Keep everything together and feedback immediate. 7. The leader should be on the front lines. You should be a battlefield general. 8. "If they see the general out on the battlefield, the troops are going to be motivated. Wherever Napoleon was, that's where his armies would do best." 9. Apply The Algorithm constantly. (1) Question every requirement. (2) Delete any part of the process you can. (3) Simplify and optimize. (4) Accelerate cycle time. (5) Automate. 10. Repetition is persuasive. "I became a broken record on the algorithm. I think it's helpful to say it to an annoying degree." 11. You should go ultra-hardcore on deletion and simplification. 12. Camaraderie is dangerous. It makes it hard for people to challenge each other’s work. (Refer to point #1) 13. Never ask your troops to do something you wouldn’t do. 14. Hire for attitude. Skills can be taught. Attitude changes require a brain transplant. 15. Good attitude = A desire to work maniacally hard. 16. The only rules are the ones dictated by the laws of physics. Everything else is a recommendation. 17. Keep your entire company committed to a common goal. 18. If things aren’t going well, throw away the existing design, start from first principles, question every requirement based on fundamental physics. 19. Find the limit. You want to delete as much as possible and you can’t do that unless you find the limit. 20. If you aren’t adding back at least 10% of the things you deleted, then you didn’t delete enough. 21. Maintain control. Avoid joint ventures. Eliminate middlemen. 22. Have a relentless dedication to questioning every requirement. 23. No work about work, just work. 24. Go to the problem. Get on the plane. Fly to the source. Go to the exact location in the factory. Go to the problem and stay there until it's resolved. 25. The best part is no part. 26. Be wired for war. 27. Do not fear losing. It hurts the first 50 times but then you’ll be able to play with less emotion. You will take more risks. 28. Stay heads down focused on doing useful things for civilization. 29. When something is important and has to be done quickly, have meetings every 24 hours to run the algorithm and check on the previous days progress. You'll be shocked at how fast this speeds things up. 30. Life needs to be interesting and edgy. 31. Delete, delete, delete, delete. There are 100 more ideas in the episode. I hope you listen to it. 30 years of Elon’s career + 60 hours of reading and research and me just absolutely ripping through idea after idea at 2x speed for 90 minutes. It will be hard to find a better use of time.

David Senra

3,746,879 views • 11 months ago