Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

PV Narasimha Rao explaining how a language prompt should be so that the computer can understand. This was in 1996 when many of us didn't even know the existence of computers.

138,856 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von AMARENDER.B
AMARENDER.Bvor 1 Jahr

But there is one person who thinks he invented computers and created Hyderabad.😂😂

Profilbild von OnlineBookClub.org
OnlineBookClub.orgvor 1 Jahr

Logic dictates that something—or someone—always had to exist. Assume it was a “someone,” not a “something.” Why would such a being create a world like ours, one filled with pain? The Advent of Time provides a definitive answer.

Profilbild von Nagesh Addapa
Nagesh Addapavor 1 Jahr

He is predicting future AI . What a knowledge able man and was ahead of his times 🙏🏻

Profilbild von Madapathi
Madapathivor 1 Jahr

The legend from Telangana

Profilbild von realside
realsidevor 1 Jahr

great pvnr garu from telangana who never supported the idea of separate tg state .proud united andhra leader

Profilbild von Save ANDHRA
Save ANDHRAvor 1 Jahr

First time listening to him speaking in Telugu 😍😍

Profilbild von Bharadwaja Cheruvu
Bharadwaja Cheruvuvor 1 Jahr

He learned two coding languages in 1980s, Also his press secretary Damodaran written as Everyday he used to write his diary by using computer. His zeal for learning is really inspirational.

Profilbild von iMBatman...🌶️
iMBatman...🌶️vor 1 Jahr

visionary leader 🙏

Profilbild von ExpectoPatronum
ExpectoPatronumvor 1 Jahr

Only Indian PM who knew how to code, I guess

Profilbild von Siva Patibandla
Siva Patibandlavor 1 Jahr

@rao2z in case you didn’t see this video before.

Profilbild von lorem ipsum
lorem ipsumvor 1 Jahr

His explanation is very clean.

Ähnliche Videos

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

Arjun Khemani

33,110 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr