Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

PV Narasimha Rao explaining how a language prompt should be so that the computer can understand. This was in 1996 when many of us didn't even know the existence of computers.

138,856 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля AMARENDER.B
AMARENDER.B1 год назад

But there is one person who thinks he invented computers and created Hyderabad.😂😂

Фото профиля OnlineBookClub.org
OnlineBookClub.org1 год назад

Logic dictates that something—or someone—always had to exist. Assume it was a “someone,” not a “something.” Why would such a being create a world like ours, one filled with pain? The Advent of Time provides a definitive answer.

Фото профиля Nagesh Addapa
Nagesh Addapa1 год назад

He is predicting future AI . What a knowledge able man and was ahead of his times 🙏🏻

Фото профиля Madapathi
Madapathi1 год назад

The legend from Telangana

Фото профиля realside
realside1 год назад

great pvnr garu from telangana who never supported the idea of separate tg state .proud united andhra leader

Фото профиля Save ANDHRA
Save ANDHRA1 год назад

First time listening to him speaking in Telugu 😍😍

Фото профиля Bharadwaja Cheruvu
Bharadwaja Cheruvu1 год назад

He learned two coding languages in 1980s, Also his press secretary Damodaran written as Everyday he used to write his diary by using computer. His zeal for learning is really inspirational.

Фото профиля iMBatman...🌶️
iMBatman...🌶️1 год назад

visionary leader 🙏

Фото профиля ExpectoPatronum
ExpectoPatronum1 год назад

Only Indian PM who knew how to code, I guess

Фото профиля Siva Patibandla
Siva Patibandla1 год назад

@rao2z in case you didn’t see this video before.

Фото профиля lorem ipsum
lorem ipsum1 год назад

His explanation is very clean.

Похожие видео

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

Arjun Khemani

33,110 просмотров • 1 год назад