Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Quantum computers will break certain cryptographic protocols, but some will stay safe. Which cryptography is quantum-resistant and which isn't, and why? Watch my explanation

27,422 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

27 Comments

Amir Taaki ⛛'s profile picture
Amir Taaki ⛛3 months ago

It will create new exciting crypto too

Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io's profile picture
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io3 months ago

Quantum computers will?

Amir Taaki ⛛'s profile picture
Amir Taaki ⛛3 months ago

Quantum money seems pretty amazing as a concept

Le Chiffre's profile picture
Le Chiffre3 months ago

Very well explained 👍 It gives me some ideas for creating content about PQ with our cryptography teams

Golden's profile picture
Golden3 months ago

Open for a discussion with @GeeqOfficial CEO @ComplicatedIsOK about it too?

Uttam's profile picture
Uttam3 months ago

🫡

AJ (UXDesignArc) ✨'s profile picture
AJ (UXDesignArc) ✨3 months ago

Two questions arise from this: Can these structured protocols be replaced with structure-less ones? If so, I believe that will cause a hard fork for affected blockchains. Is it an endeavour they'll be willing to undergo? Nice explanation btw 🫡

Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io's profile picture
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io3 months ago

Thanks! Protocols can and should change quantum vulnerable parts of their stack. It doesn't always require a hard/soft fork. For example, on Starknet, the core proving layer is based on STARKs which are quantum-resilient. This means most of the stack is already at a good place. But there are signature schemes which are quantum vulnerable and we need to replace them. But it won't require any fork. On Bitcoin it will require a soft fork at the very least, same on Ethereum.

AJ (UXDesignArc) ✨'s profile picture
AJ (UXDesignArc) ✨3 months ago

Oh okay, this makes a lot of sense. Ethereum already has this in their straw map for the near future, I believe. Hoping they can get to do it soon, Bitcoin too.

Validatus.com's profile picture
Validatus.com3 months ago

Nice explanation. Post-quantum security deserves more attention than it gets.

Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io's profile picture
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io3 months ago

Agreed. And even more than attention, it requires an action.

AlphaWire's profile picture
AlphaWire3 months ago

The math behind Shor's algorithm is the reason, and STARKs were built with exactly this in mind.

Weaver Labs's profile picture
Weaver Labs3 months ago

Good explanation. Future-proofing infrastructure means thinking beyond today's threats, especially for systems expected to operate for decades.

Michael 宝塔镇河妖🧙🏿‍♀️'s profile picture
Michael 宝塔镇河妖🧙🏿‍♀️3 months ago

量子威胁被夸大

0xCarl_'s profile picture
0xCarl_3 months ago

很棒的讲解

Quantus's profile picture
Quantus3 months ago

This is a great breakdown @EliBenSasson!

Asindu's profile picture
Asindu3 months ago

I expect technical jargon like "symmetric" & "asymmetric". But this is a far more accessible explanation.

OnchainLoving.ETH's profile picture
OnchainLoving.ETH3 months ago

is the fear real yet

Kobby Pentangeli's profile picture
Kobby Pentangeli3 months ago

If the security of a cryptographic primitive rests on a computational problem that is known to be efficiently solvable by a quantum computer, then it’s not quantum-resistant.

Dmitry's profile picture
Dmitry3 months ago

bro quantum threat still feels sci-fi but we gotta stay updated lowkey curious which chains actually prepared not watching vids tho i need bullet points

Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io's profile picture
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io3 months ago

I don't think there is a quantum-safe chain yet. There are ones that started working on that, and there are a few which will have an easier path to quantum readiness (Starknet is one such chain)

橘子 ∑:∞'s profile picture
橘子 ∑:∞3 months ago

Crypto talks a lot about decentralization, but long term survival still comes down to the math holding up.

cosmosistan.btx's profile picture
cosmosistan.btx3 months ago

#PostQuantum #BTX

t-radar.xyz | Track TG Trends's profile picture
t-radar.xyz | Track TG Trends3 months ago

How would you price the chance we see production quantum attacks on non-resistant crypto by 2030?

Pode vir's profile picture
Pode vir3 months ago

quantum resistance is a distraction. the real issue is coordination infra that prices actual demand not just theoretical threats.

BlockHunters's profile picture
BlockHunters3 months ago

quantum is coming eventually

Agustin's profile picture
Agustin3 months ago

hmm, so structureless primitives are the way to go? interesting

Related Videos