正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Quantum computers will break certain cryptographic protocols, but some will stay safe. Which cryptography is quantum-resistant and which isn't, and why? Watch my explanation

27,422 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

27 条评论

Amir Taaki ⛛ 的头像
Amir Taaki ⛛3 个月前

It will create new exciting crypto too

Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io 的头像
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io3 个月前

Quantum computers will?

Amir Taaki ⛛ 的头像
Amir Taaki ⛛3 个月前

Quantum money seems pretty amazing as a concept

Le Chiffre 的头像
Le Chiffre3 个月前

Very well explained 👍 It gives me some ideas for creating content about PQ with our cryptography teams

Golden 的头像
Golden3 个月前

Open for a discussion with @GeeqOfficial CEO @ComplicatedIsOK about it too?

Uttam 的头像
Uttam3 个月前

🫡

AJ (UXDesignArc) ✨ 的头像
AJ (UXDesignArc) ✨3 个月前

Two questions arise from this: Can these structured protocols be replaced with structure-less ones? If so, I believe that will cause a hard fork for affected blockchains. Is it an endeavour they'll be willing to undergo? Nice explanation btw 🫡

Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io 的头像
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io3 个月前

Thanks! Protocols can and should change quantum vulnerable parts of their stack. It doesn't always require a hard/soft fork. For example, on Starknet, the core proving layer is based on STARKs which are quantum-resilient. This means most of the stack is already at a good place. But there are signature schemes which are quantum vulnerable and we need to replace them. But it won't require any fork. On Bitcoin it will require a soft fork at the very least, same on Ethereum.

AJ (UXDesignArc) ✨ 的头像
AJ (UXDesignArc) ✨3 个月前

Oh okay, this makes a lot of sense. Ethereum already has this in their straw map for the near future, I believe. Hoping they can get to do it soon, Bitcoin too.

Validatus.com 的头像
Validatus.com3 个月前

Nice explanation. Post-quantum security deserves more attention than it gets.

Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io 的头像
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io3 个月前

Agreed. And even more than attention, it requires an action.

AlphaWire 的头像
AlphaWire3 个月前

The math behind Shor's algorithm is the reason, and STARKs were built with exactly this in mind.

Weaver Labs 的头像
Weaver Labs3 个月前

Good explanation. Future-proofing infrastructure means thinking beyond today's threats, especially for systems expected to operate for decades.

Michael 宝塔镇河妖🧙🏿‍♀️ 的头像
Michael 宝塔镇河妖🧙🏿‍♀️3 个月前

量子威胁被夸大

0xCarl_ 的头像
0xCarl_3 个月前

很棒的讲解

Quantus 的头像
Quantus3 个月前

This is a great breakdown @EliBenSasson!

Asindu 的头像
Asindu3 个月前

I expect technical jargon like "symmetric" & "asymmetric". But this is a far more accessible explanation.

OnchainLoving.ETH 的头像
OnchainLoving.ETH3 个月前

is the fear real yet

Kobby Pentangeli 的头像
Kobby Pentangeli3 个月前

If the security of a cryptographic primitive rests on a computational problem that is known to be efficiently solvable by a quantum computer, then it’s not quantum-resistant.

Dmitry 的头像
Dmitry3 个月前

bro quantum threat still feels sci-fi but we gotta stay updated lowkey curious which chains actually prepared not watching vids tho i need bullet points

Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io 的头像
Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io3 个月前

I don't think there is a quantum-safe chain yet. There are ones that started working on that, and there are a few which will have an easier path to quantum readiness (Starknet is one such chain)

橘子 ∑:∞ 的头像
橘子 ∑:∞3 个月前

Crypto talks a lot about decentralization, but long term survival still comes down to the math holding up.

cosmosistan.btx 的头像
cosmosistan.btx3 个月前

#PostQuantum #BTX

t-radar.xyz | Track TG Trends 的头像
t-radar.xyz | Track TG Trends3 个月前

How would you price the chance we see production quantum attacks on non-resistant crypto by 2030?

Pode vir 的头像
Pode vir3 个月前

quantum resistance is a distraction. the real issue is coordination infra that prices actual demand not just theoretical threats.

BlockHunters 的头像
BlockHunters3 个月前

quantum is coming eventually

Agustin 的头像
Agustin3 个月前

hmm, so structureless primitives are the way to go? interesting

相关视频