Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Rajdeep: Why TN is so corrupted?? Double Watch Douglas: Which state is not corrupted?? 🤦🏽🤦🏽 Rajdeep : That's a bad answer 😆😆👌👌 It shows DWD still reeling under Pannaiyar mindset by acknowledging corruption in PeeMuka is part and parcel of life 😏😏😏

ArunmozhiVarman 🇮🇳 🕉🚩🛕🎻🎧🎙🎶

12,848 subscribers

44,741 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

So it’s not nighttime or daytime on the “other side” of the globe, AND the sun behind the moon is also reflecting off of the front of the moon. 👌😆😏

So it’s not nighttime or daytime on the “other side” of the globe, AND the sun behind the moon is also reflecting off of the front of the moon. 👌😆😏

truthache

37,749 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Why I call Rajdeep Sardesai a Dalal of Congress. Rajdeep in same line criticises changing of GDP Calculation method and also quotes that IMF giving India C-rating in GDP Calculation last year. I thought, maybe Rajdeep is illiterate that IMF gave C-rating because India was using outdated base year, not using double deflation, etc. Which is exactly why change in base year and methodology was required. But then I found Rajdeep's interview with Gita Gopinath, 5 months back. There Rajdeep was questioning on why India didn't change base year which made IMF give India C-rating. They discussed rebasing and double deflation method to be adopted. Now when it has happened, same Rajdeep says why keep changing methodology.

Why I call Rajdeep Sardesai a Dalal of Congress. Rajdeep in same line criticises changing of GDP Calculation method and also quotes that IMF giving India C-rating in GDP Calculation last year. I thought, maybe Rajdeep is illiterate that IMF gave C-rating because India was using outdated base year, not using double deflation, etc. Which is exactly why change in base year and methodology was required. But then I found Rajdeep's interview with Gita Gopinath, 5 months back. There Rajdeep was questioning on why India didn't change base year which made IMF give India C-rating. They discussed rebasing and double deflation method to be adopted. Now when it has happened, same Rajdeep says why keep changing methodology.

Ankur Singh

52,247 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

2026 must be the year of accountability. For when falsehoods are dressed as law, when elections are corrupted, and when more than 300,000 children vanish under reckless open-border policies, silence becomes complicity. Such offenses cannot be dismissed, forgotten, or buried by time. Accountability is not vengeance—it is duty. It is the only means by which a republic may correct its course and remain worthy of the people it serves. A nation that rejects accountability surrenders itself to corruption.

2026 must be the year of accountability. For when falsehoods are dressed as law, when elections are corrupted, and when more than 300,000 children vanish under reckless open-border policies, silence becomes complicity. Such offenses cannot be dismissed, forgotten, or buried by time. Accountability is not vengeance—it is duty. It is the only means by which a republic may correct its course and remain worthy of the people it serves. A nation that rejects accountability surrenders itself to corruption.

General Mike Flynn

63,582 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

.Dana Perino shares a story from her recent trip to Sierra Leone on Mercy Ships that shows why corruption like we’re seeing in Minnesota cannot go unpunished… “The number one thing they ask for in their county is for corruption to stop in their country… because [corruption] is the bad seed that starts to unravel all of your rule of law, and you cannot have a country or a city or a state in which you’re ignoring it all. It will end in ruins. It will end in tears.”

.Dana Perino shares a story from her recent trip to Sierra Leone on Mercy Ships that shows why corruption like we’re seeing in Minnesota cannot go unpunished… “The number one thing they ask for in their county is for corruption to stop in their country… because [corruption] is the bad seed that starts to unravel all of your rule of law, and you cannot have a country or a city or a state in which you’re ignoring it all. It will end in ruins. It will end in tears.”

The Five

48,441 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

fai: the princess looks so gorgeous in person. now i know why you're willing to give it all to protect her 😏 lom: 👊🏻 nam: it's a matter of life and death, but you still have the nerve to tease her, huh? //THIS IS SO GOOODDDDD 5555555555 THE AIR HIDDEN HEART #เสน่หาวาโยตอนที่3

fai: the princess looks so gorgeous in person. now i know why you're willing to give it all to protect her 😏 lom: 👊🏻 nam: it's a matter of life and death, but you still have the nerve to tease her, huh? //THIS IS SO GOOODDDDD 5555555555 THE AIR HIDDEN HEART #เสน่หาวาโยตอนที่3

r (itsbecfreen_ real)

63,046 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Most people think prompting is just writing better sentences Anthropic shows why that's wrong This 32-minute workshop breaks down how prompts are built for production Not prompt hacks Not "act as" Not another $300 course Actual systems Evals Edge cases Model migration Agent loops Good prompt is not one message It's a workflow the model can follow, test and improve This matters because every new claude opus or sonnet will still reward the same rules Watch the prompting playbook Bookmark it before your next bad ai answer is just a bad setup

Most people think prompting is just writing better sentences Anthropic shows why that's wrong This 32-minute workshop breaks down how prompts are built for production Not prompt hacks Not "act as" Not another $300 course Actual systems Evals Edge cases Model migration Agent loops Good prompt is not one message It's a workflow the model can follow, test and improve This matters because every new claude opus or sonnet will still reward the same rules Watch the prompting playbook Bookmark it before your next bad ai answer is just a bad setup

rari

391,609 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Being There (1979) is a cinematic ink blot test, and we still don’t have a definitive answer for why Peter Sellers walks on water in the final shot. Is it a Christ allegory? Or is it the purest visual metaphor for Chance: a man so unburdened by ego, that he simply glides through life without ever breaking the surface. Or are we, like everyone in the film, projecting meaning onto a simple gardener and calling it a miracle? Maybe the joke's on us, life could be just a state of mind after all.

Being There (1979) is a cinematic ink blot test, and we still don’t have a definitive answer for why Peter Sellers walks on water in the final shot. Is it a Christ allegory? Or is it the purest visual metaphor for Chance: a man so unburdened by ego, that he simply glides through life without ever breaking the surface. Or are we, like everyone in the film, projecting meaning onto a simple gardener and calling it a miracle? Maybe the joke's on us, life could be just a state of mind after all.

The Sting

79,429 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The problem of the fuel subsidy removal by Tinubu is the corruption aspect of the subsidy and that's why Peter Obi said that as president he will first remove the corruption aspect of the subsidy. It takes one day to fight corruption. If the head is not corrupt then everybody will sit up. If Peter Obi becomes president and says anybody who becomes involved in subsidy corruption will go to jail and the people know he is serious, they will not be involved in the corruption. Corruption follows the body language of the president — Rotimi Amaechi ME: Thank you so much sir for confirming that Peter Obi's plan on subsidy is the best. If you watch the whole interview, it was about Atiku's subsidy removal but he switched to explain Peter Obi's subsidy plans. It's clear and everybody knows it. Thank you so much also for acknowledging what Peter Obi has been saying since which is the fact that the best way to fight corruption is that the head must not be part of the corruption and his family and friends must not also be part of it and then the rest becomes history. You also used the best person (Peter Obi) for the example of fighting corruption. You couldn't have used Atiku as an example when discussing fighting corruption because even you know that Nigerians will laugh 😂🤣 at you. Well-done sir. I know deep down in your heart, you are 100% Obidient. Nigeria will be OK ✌️

The problem of the fuel subsidy removal by Tinubu is the corruption aspect of the subsidy and that's why Peter Obi said that as president he will first remove the corruption aspect of the subsidy. It takes one day to fight corruption. If the head is not corrupt then everybody will sit up. If Peter Obi becomes president and says anybody who becomes involved in subsidy corruption will go to jail and the people know he is serious, they will not be involved in the corruption. Corruption follows the body language of the president — Rotimi Amaechi ME: Thank you so much sir for confirming that Peter Obi's plan on subsidy is the best. If you watch the whole interview, it was about Atiku's subsidy removal but he switched to explain Peter Obi's subsidy plans. It's clear and everybody knows it. Thank you so much also for acknowledging what Peter Obi has been saying since which is the fact that the best way to fight corruption is that the head must not be part of the corruption and his family and friends must not also be part of it and then the rest becomes history. You also used the best person (Peter Obi) for the example of fighting corruption. You couldn't have used Atiku as an example when discussing fighting corruption because even you know that Nigerians will laugh 😂🤣 at you. Well-done sir. I know deep down in your heart, you are 100% Obidient. Nigeria will be OK ✌️

Advocacy For Good Governance

12,958 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

looksam: why did you choose "IF I"? haruto: well, first of all...in the chorus part, it's only me singing and the song starts with me too. so basically it's my song. 😆 looksam; are you recommending it because of that? haruto: no, not exactly. actually, like you mentioned earlier, it's probably because it's the newest one. that's probably the bigger reason. looksam: i don't think so😂 i think what you said before is the bigger reason haruto: well, having that reason isn't bad either😆 that's just a tiny bit of personal bias. looksam: you're a so honest person haruto: i can't lie, i really can't lie. i live with no filter. completely unfiltered😆

looksam: why did you choose "IF I"? haruto: well, first of all...in the chorus part, it's only me singing and the song starts with me too. so basically it's my song. 😆 looksam; are you recommending it because of that? haruto: no, not exactly. actually, like you mentioned earlier, it's probably because it's the newest one. that's probably the bigger reason. looksam: i don't think so😂 i think what you said before is the bigger reason haruto: well, having that reason isn't bad either😆 that's just a tiny bit of personal bias. looksam: you're a so honest person haruto: i can't lie, i really can't lie. i live with no filter. completely unfiltered😆

er⭑🦋๋࣭

27,671 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

jay and his american ass fighting the urge not to say "soccer" instead of "football" because of the zlaten fanboy in him lmaoo 🐈‍⬛️ I really loved soc- i really loved football and enjoyed it (in childhood) 🐈‍⬛️ And that's (zlaten) is the reason why i'm saying football, not soccer even if i'm american 🐈‍⬛️ Like zlaten always said like "its football not soccer" so..okay. whatever you say 😏 that's right

jay and his american ass fighting the urge not to say "soccer" instead of "football" because of the zlaten fanboy in him lmaoo 🐈‍⬛️ I really loved soc- i really loved football and enjoyed it (in childhood) 🐈‍⬛️ And that's (zlaten) is the reason why i'm saying football, not soccer even if i'm american 🐈‍⬛️ Like zlaten always said like "its football not soccer" so..okay. whatever you say 😏 that's right

zia ☘️

15,054 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING: Don Lemon went to the DEEP-BLUE state of New Jersey, and almost every voter he spoke to said they were voting for Trump 😂😂 One guy LAUGHED IN HIS FACE when he tried to claim the economy is better under Kamala Harris than it was under Trump THIS IS GOLD!!! If this is the reality on the ground in Democrat cities like Atlantic City, imagine what the truth is in the so-called battleground states. Real life shows us exactly why the polls are FAKE. Trump is leading by a lot

BREAKING: Don Lemon went to the DEEP-BLUE state of New Jersey, and almost every voter he spoke to said they were voting for Trump 😂😂 One guy LAUGHED IN HIS FACE when he tried to claim the economy is better under Kamala Harris than it was under Trump THIS IS GOLD!!! If this is the reality on the ground in Democrat cities like Atlantic City, imagine what the truth is in the so-called battleground states. Real life shows us exactly why the polls are FAKE. Trump is leading by a lot

George

2,170,676 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🇺🇸 ANDREW TATE: ALL SYSTEMS COLLAPSE, DEMOCRACY IS NEXT "All systems are broken. Democracy is a good system, but it becomes corrupted. And obviously, dictatorships are not a perfect system either. All systems eventually collapse under the weight of their own ineptitude, because all systems are inept. It is a cycle in which democracy falls to a kingdom of some sort, where we find a savior. Eventually, when the king dies and is replaced by someone inept, we then call to choose our own king, and democracy returns. I'm not saying I have the solution to this, because all empires have fallen the same way. What I'm saying, and what I'm doing, is lamenting the end of democracy as we know it, because it is happening in front of our eyes."

🇺🇸 ANDREW TATE: ALL SYSTEMS COLLAPSE, DEMOCRACY IS NEXT "All systems are broken. Democracy is a good system, but it becomes corrupted. And obviously, dictatorships are not a perfect system either. All systems eventually collapse under the weight of their own ineptitude, because all systems are inept. It is a cycle in which democracy falls to a kingdom of some sort, where we find a savior. Eventually, when the king dies and is replaced by someone inept, we then call to choose our own king, and democracy returns. I'm not saying I have the solution to this, because all empires have fallen the same way. What I'm saying, and what I'm doing, is lamenting the end of democracy as we know it, because it is happening in front of our eyes."

Mario Nawfal

133,363 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"As a philosopher, I think DEI is solving what we call the problem of evil. Why is the world so difficult to live in? Why has it imposed so many hardships on us? And this is their solution: the answer is whiteness." -Dr Owen Anderson Think about that. The problem of evil. That's theological territory. For centuries, men have wrestled with why suffering exists in this world. Now universities like Arizona State University supposedly have the answer. It isn't sin. It isn't human nature. It isn't the complexity of existence. It's whiteness. They have taken one of the deepest questions in human history and given it the tribal, most dangerous possible answer, and then built an entire indoctrination around it, funded by your taxes, taught to your children. --- Owen Anderson teaches philosophy at Arizona State University and he is a legal battle for resisting DEI indoctrination. Full conversation in post below.

"As a philosopher, I think DEI is solving what we call the problem of evil. Why is the world so difficult to live in? Why has it imposed so many hardships on us? And this is their solution: the answer is whiteness." -Dr Owen Anderson Think about that. The problem of evil. That's theological territory. For centuries, men have wrestled with why suffering exists in this world. Now universities like Arizona State University supposedly have the answer. It isn't sin. It isn't human nature. It isn't the complexity of existence. It's whiteness. They have taken one of the deepest questions in human history and given it the tribal, most dangerous possible answer, and then built an entire indoctrination around it, funded by your taxes, taught to your children. --- Owen Anderson teaches philosophy at Arizona State University and he is a legal battle for resisting DEI indoctrination. Full conversation in post below.

Eli Steele

17,313 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

hyunjin acting out “what time is it already? you’re still sleeping?” in different ways 😆 1️⃣ curious ver 🥟 oh! what time is it.. already..? you’re still.. sleeping..? 2️⃣ sad ver 🥟 ㅠㅠ what time is it already ㅠㅠ you’re still sleeping ㅠㅠ 3️⃣ mockery ver 🥟 HA! HEY! hey what time is it already?! you’re still sleeping?! wow.. it’s the first time i’ve seen someone be like this 4️⃣ angry ver 🥟 hey. what time is it already. what time is it already and you’re still sleeping. are you not going to get it together? are you going to live like that? sleep like that your whole life then. 👤 so scary.. 🥟 hehe 5️⃣ seductive ver 🥟 HAHAHAHA.. oi.. ah i can’t do this 🥟 ah flirting kind of vibe? 🥟 what time is it already, you’re still sleeping~? 😏 what time is it already you’re still sleeping~~ ♡

hyunjin acting out “what time is it already? you’re still sleeping?” in different ways 😆 1️⃣ curious ver 🥟 oh! what time is it.. already..? you’re still.. sleeping..? 2️⃣ sad ver 🥟 ㅠㅠ what time is it already ㅠㅠ you’re still sleeping ㅠㅠ 3️⃣ mockery ver 🥟 HA! HEY! hey what time is it already?! you’re still sleeping?! wow.. it’s the first time i’ve seen someone be like this 4️⃣ angry ver 🥟 hey. what time is it already. what time is it already and you’re still sleeping. are you not going to get it together? are you going to live like that? sleep like that your whole life then. 👤 so scary.. 🥟 hehe 5️⃣ seductive ver 🥟 HAHAHAHA.. oi.. ah i can’t do this 🥟 ah flirting kind of vibe? 🥟 what time is it already, you’re still sleeping~? 😏 what time is it already you’re still sleeping~~ ♡

현빵

28,643 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Doesn't matter since the game forces you to watch about 3 seconds of the MVP before you're allowed to skip it, and there is a feature that lets you choose where to begin the MVP clip, so everyone else still has no choice but to watch that part.😏 Also MVP can be added to profiles in the future.

Doesn't matter since the game forces you to watch about 3 seconds of the MVP before you're allowed to skip it, and there is a feature that lets you choose where to begin the MVP clip, so everyone else still has no choice but to watch that part.😏 Also MVP can be added to profiles in the future.

Rexlent

101,376 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

Stefan.

3,018,747 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten