Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Ran two prompts in Kimi K2.7 Code HighSpeed, Kimi K2.7 Code, and GLM 5.2 HighSpeed is 2.5 to 4.2 times faster than Kimi K2.7 Code while producing comparable quality 4.5 to 15 times faster than GLM 5.2, and half the price (or less) These are simple tests, so the... show more

GMI Cloud

5,805 subscribers

38,008 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 both were tested on same settings with same prompt > GLM one shotted everything in 35 mins > Kimi needed extra prompts to fix movements and took 30 mins super surpised by how good GLM 5.2 is, while being so cheap which one do you think won?

GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 both were tested on same settings with same prompt > GLM one shotted everything in 35 mins > Kimi needed extra prompts to fix movements and took 30 mins super surpised by how good GLM 5.2 is, while being so cheap which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

63,741 views • 1 month ago

🌘 Meet Kimi K2.7 Code HighSpeed! A high-speed mode of our latest open-source multimodal coding model, Kimi K2.7 Code. ⚡️ Up to 6× faster: Around 180 tok/s on coding tasks with median-length inputs, and up to 260 tok/s on shorter-context tasks. 🔷 Rolling out to Kimi Code Beta Program members, Kimi API developers, and Kimi Business users. (Access will remain limited for now due to capacity constraints.) 🔷 No invite needed. Anyone who joins the Beta Program has a chance to get access 👉 Open intelligence should be instant, affordable, and borderless. We'll continue improving the model and expanding access as more capacity becomes available! 🔗 Kimi Code: 🔗 API:

🌘 Meet Kimi K2.7 Code HighSpeed! A high-speed mode of our latest open-source multimodal coding model, Kimi K2.7 Code. ⚡️ Up to 6× faster: Around 180 tok/s on coding tasks with median-length inputs, and up to 260 tok/s on shorter-context tasks. 🔷 Rolling out to Kimi Code Beta Program members, Kimi API developers, and Kimi Business users. (Access will remain limited for now due to capacity constraints.) 🔷 No invite needed. Anyone who joins the Beta Program has a chance to get access 👉 Open intelligence should be instant, affordable, and borderless. We'll continue improving the model and expanding access as more capacity becomes available! 🔗 Kimi Code: 🔗 API:

Kimi.ai

567,450 views • 1 month ago

Grok should be praised a lot , this is one of the biggest launch > priced way less than even kimi k2.7 , glm 5.2 > on artificial code analysis only behind fable 5 and gpt 5.5 xhigh > this is well rounded launch i will showcase a 3d test that will blow everyone mind

Grok should be praised a lot , this is one of the biggest launch > priced way less than even kimi k2.7 , glm 5.2 > on artificial code analysis only behind fable 5 and gpt 5.5 xhigh > this is well rounded launch i will showcase a 3d test that will blow everyone mind

Chetaslua

25,644 views • 19 days ago

MiniMax M3 vs GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 in Lunar Lander contest! 🔥 Last test of the day before going back to learning & build phase with Local Models, Swift and Apple Core AI 💪 I took the opportunity to test the MiniMax Code app for macOS. Video below speeded up. Followed by Lunar Lander implementation from the various models. My ranking: 🥇 GLM 5.2 🥈 MiniMax M3 🥉 Kimi K2.7 Coding Prompt and final results in this gist:

MiniMax M3 vs GLM-5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 in Lunar Lander contest! 🔥 Last test of the day before going back to learning & build phase with Local Models, Swift and Apple Core AI 💪 I took the opportunity to test the MiniMax Code app for macOS. Video below speeded up. Followed by Lunar Lander implementation from the various models. My ranking: 🥇 GLM 5.2 🥈 MiniMax M3 🥉 Kimi K2.7 Coding Prompt and final results in this gist:

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

21,604 views • 1 month ago

We ran a test comparing GLM 5.2 vs Sonnet 5. We used the same prompt, with /design in the command code. The difference is big - effects, motion, and especially the footer. Sonnet 5 had nice hover effects, but didn't come close to GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 wins on quality and pricing.

We ran a test comparing GLM 5.2 vs Sonnet 5. We used the same prompt, with /design in the command code. The difference is big - effects, motion, and especially the footer. Sonnet 5 had nice hover effects, but didn't come close to GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 wins on quality and pricing.

Command Code

44,260 views • 27 days ago

New Z.ai GLM-5.2 beats Kimi K2.7 Code on physics contest! We gave both models the same three prompts and asked them to build self contained HTML5 sims with real physics and no libraries: 1. Pool break 2. Block on a bed of springs 3. Galton board Outputs: GLM-5.2: 12,640 tokens Kimi K2.7 Code: 7,420 tokens GLM 5.2 nailed all three, and it did it with way more detail and polish. The break conserved momentum, the block bounced off the springs and the Galton beads spread into a clean bell curve. Kimi struggled on every scene: its block fell straight through the springs, its break didn't look realistic with the balls colliding all wrong, and on the Galton board its balls overlapped and piled into each other instead of spreading out

New Z.ai GLM-5.2 beats Kimi K2.7 Code on physics contest! We gave both models the same three prompts and asked them to build self contained HTML5 sims with real physics and no libraries: 1. Pool break 2. Block on a bed of springs 3. Galton board Outputs: GLM-5.2: 12,640 tokens Kimi K2.7 Code: 7,420 tokens GLM 5.2 nailed all three, and it did it with way more detail and polish. The break conserved momentum, the block bounced off the springs and the Galton beads spread into a clean bell curve. Kimi struggled on every scene: its block fell straight through the springs, its break didn't look realistic with the balls colliding all wrong, and on the Galton board its balls overlapped and piled into each other instead of spreading out

atomic.chat

60,899 views • 1 month ago

Kimi K2.7 Code just dropped from Moonshot AI. GLM 5.2 is faster, smarter, and cheaper. I purchased both the $39 and $99 plans to test it. I zapped my usage in 30 minutes. The horror game didn't work The Minecraft clone was unplayable The model got stuck outputting thousands of hashtags instead of code The Remotion video looked like a PowerPoint 262K context window in 2026 is embarrassing No BridgeMind stamp of approval. Full review video below

Kimi K2.7 Code just dropped from Moonshot AI. GLM 5.2 is faster, smarter, and cheaper. I purchased both the $39 and $99 plans to test it. I zapped my usage in 30 minutes. The horror game didn't work The Minecraft clone was unplayable The model got stuck outputting thousands of hashtags instead of code The Remotion video looked like a PowerPoint 262K context window in 2026 is embarrassing No BridgeMind stamp of approval. Full review video below

BridgeMind

47,852 views • 1 month ago

New Kimi K2.7 Code performs at GPT-5.5 level 3x cheaper! We gave both models the same three prompts: build a self-contained HTML5 canvas sim with real physics, no libraries. A spring pendulum on a stretching coil, a 1 kg block trading collisions with a 100,000 kg block, and 22 balls churning in a spinning hexagon Outputs: Kimi K2.7 Code: $0.28 on 52.4k tokens GPT-5.5: $0.93 on 23.4k tokens Spring pendulums and blocks came out even. The balls Kimi did better: its pile spins with the drum when GPT's bounce around in pure chaos. On price to quality, K2.7 Code is the clear pick

New Kimi K2.7 Code performs at GPT-5.5 level 3x cheaper! We gave both models the same three prompts: build a self-contained HTML5 canvas sim with real physics, no libraries. A spring pendulum on a stretching coil, a 1 kg block trading collisions with a 100,000 kg block, and 22 balls churning in a spinning hexagon Outputs: Kimi K2.7 Code: $0.28 on 52.4k tokens GPT-5.5: $0.93 on 23.4k tokens Spring pendulums and blocks came out even. The balls Kimi did better: its pile spins with the drum when GPT's bounce around in pure chaos. On price to quality, K2.7 Code is the clear pick

atomic.chat

139,760 views • 1 month ago

Cline has launched ClinePass, a flat monthly subscription that opens access to a curated set of open-weight coding models across its IDE extensions, CLI, and SDK. The current lineup includes GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7 Code, DeepSeek V4 Pro, MiniMax-M3, and Qwen3.7, with a subscription replacing separate API keys across providers.

Cline has launched ClinePass, a flat monthly subscription that opens access to a curated set of open-weight coding models across its IDE extensions, CLI, and SDK. The current lineup includes GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7 Code, DeepSeek V4 Pro, MiniMax-M3, and Qwen3.7, with a subscription replacing separate API keys across providers.

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog

54,728 views • 29 days ago

🆕 Kimi.ai's Kimi K2.7 Code is now generally available in GitHub Copilot. This is the first open-weight model offered as a selectable option in the Copilot model picker. 🎉 Early testing shows Kimi K2.7 is a lower-cost option with strong performance comparable to highly popular frontier models. Try it out now in Visual Studio Code and look out for it in more GitHub Copilot surfaces. 👇

🆕 Kimi.ai's Kimi K2.7 Code is now generally available in GitHub Copilot. This is the first open-weight model offered as a selectable option in the Copilot model picker. 🎉 Early testing shows Kimi K2.7 is a lower-cost option with strong performance comparable to highly popular frontier models. Try it out now in Visual Studio Code and look out for it in more GitHub Copilot surfaces. 👇

GitHub

199,011 views • 26 days ago

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

GMI Cloud

86,444 views • 1 month ago

This is pure witchcraft! A single line of code makes my Pandas code 5x faster! I don't have to migrate to a different library or change anything else. The magic happens by patching Pandas with FireDucks, a multi-threaded, compiler-accelerated library with a fully compatible pandas API. The library makes your Pandas code up to 48x faster! You have a couple of options to use FireDucks: 1. import fireducks.pandas as pd 2. Or run your code like this: `python -mfireducks.imhook main .py ` FireDucks is faster than Pandas and faster than Polars. Check the video attached to this post, and the link to the code below.

This is pure witchcraft! A single line of code makes my Pandas code 5x faster! I don't have to migrate to a different library or change anything else. The magic happens by patching Pandas with FireDucks, a multi-threaded, compiler-accelerated library with a fully compatible pandas API. The library makes your Pandas code up to 48x faster! You have a couple of options to use FireDucks: 1. import fireducks.pandas as pd 2. Or run your code like this: `python -mfireducks.imhook main .py ` FireDucks is faster than Pandas and faster than Polars. Check the video attached to this post, and the link to the code below.

Santiago

51,995 views • 1 year ago

gemini 3 flash is so crazy.. it can generate code for an interactive 3d car racing game in ~1 min, control speed and direction with hands, no need code, just text prompts its 100% free & a lot faster than 3 pro how to improve this, anyone?

gemini 3 flash is so crazy.. it can generate code for an interactive 3d car racing game in ~1 min, control speed and direction with hands, no need code, just text prompts its 100% free & a lot faster than 3 pro how to improve this, anyone?

el.cine

114,398 views • 7 months ago

everyone is talking about the new kimi k2.7 code so i tested it for real. i built a fruit ninja game i play with my index finger. webcam tracks my finger, turns it into a blade, i swipe and slice fruit midair. real tracking in the browser. and yes it's open source

everyone is talking about the new kimi k2.7 code so i tested it for real. i built a fruit ninja game i play with my index finger. webcam tracks my finger, turns it into a blade, i swipe and slice fruit midair. real tracking in the browser. and yes it's open source

Farhan

29,728 views • 1 month ago

damn its so easy to go from design -> code with Figma MCP + Claude Code. literally just one click of a button, and the code is ready! still a lot of polishing to do, but this has helped us make development ~50% faster 😁

damn its so easy to go from design -> code with Figma MCP + Claude Code. literally just one click of a button, and the code is ready! still a lot of polishing to do, but this has helped us make development ~50% faster 😁

Marcel

54,524 views • 5 months ago

So which model is the best at frontend design? You can now eval pretty much all of them in pen(dot)dev in realtime in parallel. It's the most versatile design agent, where you can Sign in with ChatGPT, use your Claude subscription, OpenCode Go, Github CoPilot, connect Cursor Composer 2.5/Grok 4.5, Minimax M3, Kimi K2.7/K3, GLM 5.2, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Plus etc, mix and match these models on design tasks directly in your codebase locally on your desktop.

So which model is the best at frontend design? You can now eval pretty much all of them in pen(dot)dev in realtime in parallel. It's the most versatile design agent, where you can Sign in with ChatGPT, use your Claude subscription, OpenCode Go, Github CoPilot, connect Cursor Composer 2.5/Grok 4.5, Minimax M3, Kimi K2.7/K3, GLM 5.2, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Plus etc, mix and match these models on design tasks directly in your codebase locally on your desktop.

Tom Krcha

2,447,546 views • 8 days ago

NVIDIA is giving away free access to 140+ AI models for a full year > most people building AI agents are paying $50-200/month for API access NVIDIA just made that argument irrelevant models you get: GLM 5.2, MiniMax M3, Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B, Kimi K2.7, and 130+ more setup: > step 1 - get your free key > go to > register -> bind phone -> copy API key > step 2 - add to Hermes agent > open Settings -> Model Provider -> Custom base_url = " api_key = "nvapi-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" > step 3 - pick a model model = "z-ai/glm-5.2" model = "minimaxai/minimax-m3" model = "nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b" model = "moonshot-ai/kimi-k2.7" > Hermes already has NVIDIA set as default base_url > paste the key and you're running instantly > works the same in Cursor and OpenCode > cost: $0 > limit: 40 req/min > expires: 1 year while everyone is paying for API access, this is sitting there for free with this many models in one place, it is also the easiest way to test which one actually fits your agent before you commit to a paid provider

NVIDIA is giving away free access to 140+ AI models for a full year > most people building AI agents are paying $50-200/month for API access NVIDIA just made that argument irrelevant models you get: GLM 5.2, MiniMax M3, Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B, Kimi K2.7, and 130+ more setup: > step 1 - get your free key > go to > register -> bind phone -> copy API key > step 2 - add to Hermes agent > open Settings -> Model Provider -> Custom base_url = " api_key = "nvapi-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" > step 3 - pick a model model = "z-ai/glm-5.2" model = "minimaxai/minimax-m3" model = "nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b" model = "moonshot-ai/kimi-k2.7" > Hermes already has NVIDIA set as default base_url > paste the key and you're running instantly > works the same in Cursor and OpenCode > cost: $0 > limit: 40 req/min > expires: 1 year while everyone is paying for API access, this is sitting there for free with this many models in one place, it is also the easiest way to test which one actually fits your agent before you commit to a paid provider

Mr. Buzzoni

116,428 views • 14 days ago

I love using GLM 5.2 for web app iteration. My workflow: generate 6 variations, then pick the best one and continue iterating on it. I built Recast to make this even easier. Give it a prompt, get 6 variations, download the code for your favorite version, then continue iterating in your own coding agent. GLM 5.2 works really well for this use case since it's fast, cheap, and great at design. On average, you can make 3-6 landing pages with GLM 5.2 for every one you can generate with Opus 4.8. And the design variety of the GLM landing pages helps a lot with trying to think through what style you want to go with. Recast is launching soon (as a web app + skill).

I love using GLM 5.2 for web app iteration. My workflow: generate 6 variations, then pick the best one and continue iterating on it. I built Recast to make this even easier. Give it a prompt, get 6 variations, download the code for your favorite version, then continue iterating in your own coding agent. GLM 5.2 works really well for this use case since it's fast, cheap, and great at design. On average, you can make 3-6 landing pages with GLM 5.2 for every one you can generate with Opus 4.8. And the design variety of the GLM landing pages helps a lot with trying to think through what style you want to go with. Recast is launching soon (as a web app + skill).

Hassan

20,164 views • 1 month ago

NEC Director Kevin Hassett: "The AI economy is moving much faster than the dot-com economy of the 90s, and the coaches that AI is producing are going to help make a lot of productive workers a heck of a lot of money."

NEC Director Kevin Hassett: "The AI economy is moving much faster than the dot-com economy of the 90s, and the coaches that AI is producing are going to help make a lot of productive workers a heck of a lot of money."

Rapid Response 47

55,083 views • 7 months ago

NEC Director Kevin Hassett: "The AI economy is moving much faster than the dot-com economy of the 90s, and the coaches that AI is producing are going to help make a lot of productive workers a heck of a lot of money."

NEC Director Kevin Hassett: "The AI economy is moving much faster than the dot-com economy of the 90s, and the coaches that AI is producing are going to help make a lot of productive workers a heck of a lot of money."

Breaking911

29,333 views • 7 months ago