正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Reality vs. Propaganda: Did North India increase its population disproportionately, while Southern States controlled it? Contrary to the popular perception, as the data shows, it is the southern states that doubled and tripled their population for the first 70 years since 1871, when North Indian States’ population witnessed negligible...

36,001 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

6 条评论

फ्रीमन रॉड्रिग्ज 的头像
फ्रीमन रॉड्रिग्ज1 年前

stop misleading the nation by comparing the data with 1871. Compare the population growth with last 10 yr, 25 yr & 50 years. Don't compare it 1800 or 1600. Utter nonsense !!

Sajjan Kumar Singh 的头像
Sajjan Kumar Singh1 年前

Demographic Transition across the world is compared Longue durée, not in short term. Here, 1871 is the starting point because it’s the first census year adjusted to current state boundaries. Understand basics before blabbering.

Rock Paper Sizzle 的头像
Rock Paper Sizzle1 年前

🇺🇸 One Nation, under Trump, Stronger THAN EVER. Are you Trump Tough? 💪Tough T's Here:

Shankar Meena 的头像
Shankar Meena1 年前

@Skmeena0898

Dhiraj Ahuja 的头像
Dhiraj Ahuja1 年前

WTF We are Indians Why are you trying to create a divide between North Indians and South Indians on the basis of who makes more babies...as if Kannada vs Tamil, Kannada vs Hindi, Tamil vs Hindi, Marathi vs Hindi was not enough You are the real enemies of India

Sajjan Kumar Singh 的头像
Sajjan Kumar Singh1 年前

It’s leaders like @mkstalin who are peddling toxic regional agenda of north vs south. The book in this tweet is just putting things in proper perspective with data driven research.

相关视频

Govt is all set to punish South India The Union government has now signalled that delimitation may be moved ahead without waiting for the Census after 2026, raising the possibility that the 2011 Census could become the base for redrawing Lok Sabha seats. For those who don’t know what delimitation is, it is the process of reallocating parliamentary seats among states in line with population changes It has a stated aim of preserving fair and proportional democratic representation. But this is where the debate becomes serious. Population trends across India have not moved uniformly A major reason is the difference in fertility rates among states. Most southern states—Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Telangana—have already brought fertility below the replacement level of 2 Meanwhile, states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar continue to record comparatively higher fertility levels. If seat redistribution follows these numbers, the political balance could shift sharply The five southern states together may end up with around 164 Lok Sabha seats, whereas Uttar Pradesh and Bihar alone could together command nearly 222. The larger question, then, is philosophical as much as political: Should states that succeeded in stabilising population growth lose representation because of that success? Many in the South see this as a structural disadvantage, almost a democratic penalty for effective population management. The political implications are equally significant Since the ruling party’s electoral strength has historically been far deeper across northern India than in much of the South, any expansion in seat share in the Hindi belt could naturally reshape the national balance of power in a way that may politically benefit the current establishment We are waiting for Govt’s official version Because if the present documents floating on internet are true, then South India is going to be penalised heavily in their possible future representation in Indian Lok Sabha 🙏

Shekhar Dutt

48,570 次观看 • 2 个月前