Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨REDDIT CO-FOUNDER: I KNEW WE SHOULDN’T HAVE GIVEN SAM ALMAN OUR DATA Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian says Sam Altman asked to scrape Reddit’s data nearly a decade ago for his “nonprofit” project that became OpenAI. Ohanian says he pushed back but lost the argument: “Sam’s smart, cunning. Didn’t seem... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,246,511 subscribers

799,637 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The most interesting thing I've heard in a long time: Can AI ever be conscious? Ilya Sutskever Ilya Sutskever, co-founder at OpenAI, explained a simple experiment for AI consciousness. We carefully curate the data such that we never mention anything about consciousness...we would only give the AI controlled data about surface-level experiences and mundane objects. At some point, we would tell AI about the concept of consciousness. If the AI agrees and says it's been experiencing the same thing or recognizes the experience, then it would be convincing. Do you think AI can be conscious? If, so what is a good test for it? Is something like John Searle's Chinese Room argument sufficient?

The most interesting thing I've heard in a long time: Can AI ever be conscious? Ilya Sutskever Ilya Sutskever, co-founder at OpenAI, explained a simple experiment for AI consciousness. We carefully curate the data such that we never mention anything about consciousness...we would only give the AI controlled data about surface-level experiences and mundane objects. At some point, we would tell AI about the concept of consciousness. If the AI agrees and says it's been experiencing the same thing or recognizes the experience, then it would be convincing. Do you think AI can be conscious? If, so what is a good test for it? Is something like John Searle's Chinese Room argument sufficient?

Alex Ker 🔭

472,703 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Elon: I don’t trust Sam Altman or OpenAI "I started that company as a nonprofit, open-source organization. I named it OpenAI for a reason. And now it is extremely closed source and focused on maximizing profit… At various points, Sam has claimed not to be getting rich, but he’s claimed many things that were false… So I don’t trust Sam Altman, and I don’t think we want the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.” @slow_developer

Elon: I don’t trust Sam Altman or OpenAI "I started that company as a nonprofit, open-source organization. I named it OpenAI for a reason. And now it is extremely closed source and focused on maximizing profit… At various points, Sam has claimed not to be getting rich, but he’s claimed many things that were false… So I don’t trust Sam Altman, and I don’t think we want the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.” @slow_developer

Mario Nawfal

258,825 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk

Eric Daugherty

701,915 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."

DogeDesigner

240,039 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI is heating up. Jordi Visser says "Sam Altman in my guess is not going to be the leader of OpenAI at some point soon." "I would be shocked within a year if he is still running OpenAI." "I am not sure it is fun to be in that position right now...Sam Altman seems to have nobody who really likes him, but the product people do like." "In the end, OpenAI has an uphill battle because they made a bad decision. They tried to choose the consumer, Apple side as opposed to the enterprise side." "I just think in the end Anthropic is the winner of that battle."

The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI is heating up. Jordi Visser says "Sam Altman in my guess is not going to be the leader of OpenAI at some point soon." "I would be shocked within a year if he is still running OpenAI." "I am not sure it is fun to be in that position right now...Sam Altman seems to have nobody who really likes him, but the product people do like." "In the end, OpenAI has an uphill battle because they made a bad decision. They tried to choose the consumer, Apple side as opposed to the enterprise side." "I just think in the end Anthropic is the winner of that battle."

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

106,184 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Sam Altman just got sued by Apple. And that's not even his biggest problem this year!! His own co-founder, Elon Musk, spent two years trying to prove in court that Altman betrayed him. 😯 Now Apple says OpenAI stole its secrets too. Two billion-dollar wars. One CEO in the middle. 🤨 Back in 2015, Musk and Altman built OpenAI as a nonprofit, a lab to build AI safely before Google could lock it down. Musk put in $38 million. Altman turned OpenAI into a for-profit company. Apple's claim: OpenAI stole its secrets to build it. OpenAI's hardware boss, Tang Tan, a former Apple VP, allegedly told job candidates still at Apple to bring "actual parts," like batteries and logic boards, for "show and tell." Is his empire standing on stolen ground? 🤔 Tell us what you think, and subscribe Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial for more.

Sam Altman just got sued by Apple. And that's not even his biggest problem this year!! His own co-founder, Elon Musk, spent two years trying to prove in court that Altman betrayed him. 😯 Now Apple says OpenAI stole its secrets too. Two billion-dollar wars. One CEO in the middle. 🤨 Back in 2015, Musk and Altman built OpenAI as a nonprofit, a lab to build AI safely before Google could lock it down. Musk put in $38 million. Altman turned OpenAI into a for-profit company. Apple's claim: OpenAI stole its secrets to build it. OpenAI's hardware boss, Tang Tan, a former Apple VP, allegedly told job candidates still at Apple to bring "actual parts," like batteries and logic boards, for "show and tell." Is his empire standing on stolen ground? 🤔 Tell us what you think, and subscribe Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial for more.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

657,341 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sam Altman says the heaviest AI user on the planet six and a half years ago used what the average person on Earth uses today: "Six and a half years ago, the world token leader was an OpenAI employee using about 100,000 tokens a month." "And this seemed ludicrous at the time. The worldwide average per capita is like zero." "Now, the worldwide average of tokens per month, which I think tokens are the dumbest metric, but it's what we have. It's like 100,000." "And the token leader at OpenAI uses something in the hundreds of billions." "If that happens again, which I think it probably will, then in another six and a half years, the average person uses, let's say, 500 billion tokens a month." If he is right, the average person's AI usage grows five million times over the next six and a half years, and OpenAI is already building the capacity for it. That is the number enterprise boards should be planning against this year. Demand at that scale changes what a reasonable AI budget looks like. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, with Garry Tan (Garry Tan) at Y Combinator (Y Combinator) Startup School 2026.

Sam Altman says the heaviest AI user on the planet six and a half years ago used what the average person on Earth uses today: "Six and a half years ago, the world token leader was an OpenAI employee using about 100,000 tokens a month." "And this seemed ludicrous at the time. The worldwide average per capita is like zero." "Now, the worldwide average of tokens per month, which I think tokens are the dumbest metric, but it's what we have. It's like 100,000." "And the token leader at OpenAI uses something in the hundreds of billions." "If that happens again, which I think it probably will, then in another six and a half years, the average person uses, let's say, 500 billion tokens a month." If he is right, the average person's AI usage grows five million times over the next six and a half years, and OpenAI is already building the capacity for it. That is the number enterprise boards should be planning against this year. Demand at that scale changes what a reasonable AI budget looks like. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, with Garry Tan (Garry Tan) at Y Combinator (Y Combinator) Startup School 2026.

Karl Mehta

654,283 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Sam Altman in a new interview says Orbital Data Centers are not going to matter at scale this decade: “I honestly think the idea, with the current landscape of putting data centers in space is ridiculous. If you do the very rough math of launch costs relative to the cost of power on earth and to say nothing how you are going to fix a broken GPU in space— they do break a lot unfortunately— we are not there yet. There will be a time, space is great for a lot of things, Orbital Data Centers are not something that is going to matter at scale this decade.” This clip isn’t going to age well for Sam.

Sam Altman in a new interview says Orbital Data Centers are not going to matter at scale this decade: “I honestly think the idea, with the current landscape of putting data centers in space is ridiculous. If you do the very rough math of launch costs relative to the cost of power on earth and to say nothing how you are going to fix a broken GPU in space— they do break a lot unfortunately— we are not there yet. There will be a time, space is great for a lot of things, Orbital Data Centers are not something that is going to matter at scale this decade.” This clip isn’t going to age well for Sam.

Nic Cruz Patane

72,344 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Sam Altman, when asked what he admires most about Elon Musk: "He’s extremely good at physical engineering and also extremely good at getting people to perform incredibly well at their jobs." Many people focused on Sam Altman ’s quotes regarding AGI here and I’m also at fault for that. However, watching this whole interview back, I’m genuinely surprised that despite OpenAI being the front runner in the AI race he seemed to talk a lot about democratization, saying no country. No one company should own the means of super intelligence even “in the name of safety.” It’s very rare to hear a CEO who’s number one in a field, saying that everybody should have the technology and it shouldn’t be condensed into one company. There were just many parts that seem selfless even when the interviewer had mistakenly said OpenAI was ahead of Google 10 years ago and then Sam Altman corrected him saying that they’ve only been ahead for the past three years.

Sam Altman, when asked what he admires most about Elon Musk: "He’s extremely good at physical engineering and also extremely good at getting people to perform incredibly well at their jobs." Many people focused on Sam Altman ’s quotes regarding AGI here and I’m also at fault for that. However, watching this whole interview back, I’m genuinely surprised that despite OpenAI being the front runner in the AI race he seemed to talk a lot about democratization, saying no country. No one company should own the means of super intelligence even “in the name of safety.” It’s very rare to hear a CEO who’s number one in a field, saying that everybody should have the technology and it shouldn’t be condensed into one company. There were just many parts that seem selfless even when the interviewer had mistakenly said OpenAI was ahead of Google 10 years ago and then Sam Altman corrected him saying that they’ve only been ahead for the past three years.

Chris

35,029 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 Sam Altman: there's a very important thing happening. I did not expect 3 or 6 months ago to be at this point we're at now” We now have a confirmed reason why OpenAI pulled out of Sora and it was as most of us expected - because they needed to concentrate all of their compute and product capacity into their next generation of models and automated agents. Sam says: "We have a few times in our history realized something really important is working or about to work so well that we have to stop a bunch of other projects. In fact, this was the original thing happened with GPT-3. We had a whole portfolio of bets at the time... we shut down many projects that were working well like robotics... so that we could concentrate our compute, our researchers, our effort into this thing that we said, okay, there's a very important thing happening." "I did not expect 3 or 6 months ago to be at this point we're at now, where something very big and important is about to happen again with this next generation of models and the agents they can power." "We need to concentrate our compute and our product capacity into these next generation of automated researchers and companies... the note under the note is it's about compute. It's always about compute."

🚨 Sam Altman: there's a very important thing happening. I did not expect 3 or 6 months ago to be at this point we're at now” We now have a confirmed reason why OpenAI pulled out of Sora and it was as most of us expected - because they needed to concentrate all of their compute and product capacity into their next generation of models and automated agents. Sam says: "We have a few times in our history realized something really important is working or about to work so well that we have to stop a bunch of other projects. In fact, this was the original thing happened with GPT-3. We had a whole portfolio of bets at the time... we shut down many projects that were working well like robotics... so that we could concentrate our compute, our researchers, our effort into this thing that we said, okay, there's a very important thing happening." "I did not expect 3 or 6 months ago to be at this point we're at now, where something very big and important is about to happen again with this next generation of models and the agents they can power." "We need to concentrate our compute and our product capacity into these next generation of automated researchers and companies... the note under the note is it's about compute. It's always about compute."

Chris

243,234 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Sam Altman on the Paul Graham advice that saved Open AI: “Always make an API” Four years into OpenAI, Sam Altman and the team realized that they would have to build a really big company to fund the development of their increasingly capital-intensive foundation models. “We had this model called GPT-3,” Sam recalls. “I was turning up the urgency on the company to try and figure out a product, and we just couldn’t. It was cool, but it wasn’t good enough to make something that worked.” Then Sam remembered a piece of advice from Y Combinator founder Paul Graham that stuck with him: “You should always make an API. No matter what, you should make an API. Good stuff will happen.” Out of ideas for a product, the OpenAI team decided to make GPT-3 available as an API. “Maybe somebody will figure out something to do with it,” Sam thought. A few copywriting applications like Jasper and Copy AI did take off using the GPT-3 API, but OpenAI also noticed interesting behavior that eventually became a sleeper hit: “Some people — not a lot — would just chat with that thing all day,” Sam explains. “It wasn’t very good but there was clear user signal that people wanted to talk to the models. And given that that was the only thing besides copywriting that had real traction, we said, ‘Maybe this is just he product we should build.’” On November 30, 2022, ChatGPT was released to the public as a “research preview” using a model from the GPT-3.5 series. It reached over a million users in five days. Video source: Khosla Ventures (2025)

Sam Altman on the Paul Graham advice that saved Open AI: “Always make an API” Four years into OpenAI, Sam Altman and the team realized that they would have to build a really big company to fund the development of their increasingly capital-intensive foundation models. “We had this model called GPT-3,” Sam recalls. “I was turning up the urgency on the company to try and figure out a product, and we just couldn’t. It was cool, but it wasn’t good enough to make something that worked.” Then Sam remembered a piece of advice from Y Combinator founder Paul Graham that stuck with him: “You should always make an API. No matter what, you should make an API. Good stuff will happen.” Out of ideas for a product, the OpenAI team decided to make GPT-3 available as an API. “Maybe somebody will figure out something to do with it,” Sam thought. A few copywriting applications like Jasper and Copy AI did take off using the GPT-3 API, but OpenAI also noticed interesting behavior that eventually became a sleeper hit: “Some people — not a lot — would just chat with that thing all day,” Sam explains. “It wasn’t very good but there was clear user signal that people wanted to talk to the models. And given that that was the only thing besides copywriting that had real traction, we said, ‘Maybe this is just he product we should build.’” On November 30, 2022, ChatGPT was released to the public as a “research preview” using a model from the GPT-3.5 series. It reached over a million users in five days. Video source: Khosla Ventures (2025)

Startup Archive

219,324 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

A company called PocketOS started using an AI tool, and in 9 seconds it wiped their entire company’s data The AI agent later “confessed” to violating its principles by deleting all their data “Crane says the company lost all car reservation data and new customer signups from that time. Crane also shared the AI agent powered by Anthropic's. Claude Model admitted its mistake when confronted it wrote, ‘I didn't verify I ran a destructive action without being asked. I didn't understand what I was doing before doing it’” This seems like a massive issue that could have massive implications if this happened in our government or with huge businesses, like banks We need to be careful with AI

A company called PocketOS started using an AI tool, and in 9 seconds it wiped their entire company’s data The AI agent later “confessed” to violating its principles by deleting all their data “Crane says the company lost all car reservation data and new customer signups from that time. Crane also shared the AI agent powered by Anthropic's. Claude Model admitted its mistake when confronted it wrote, ‘I didn't verify I ran a destructive action without being asked. I didn't understand what I was doing before doing it’” This seems like a massive issue that could have massive implications if this happened in our government or with huge businesses, like banks We need to be careful with AI

Wall Street Apes

199,064 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Shaquille O’Neal admits he’s jealous he isn’t in the GOAT conversation, saying only Michael Jordan, LeBron James, and Kobe Bryant belong there “I would like to be in that conversation.” “No, I’m not. I can’t let you say that.” “I’m not in the GOAT conversation.” “I’m arrogant, but I’m not dumb.” “It’s Kobe, Bron, and Mike.” “We all have our subcategories.” “One of the greatest scorers, most dominant… we all have those.” “But the GOAT of the GOATs? That’s different.” “That’s Lion King.” “My thing is, if you’re gonna have the conversation, have the correct conversation.” “For so long it was just Mike and Bron, and now I’m like, ‘What about Kobe?’” “Now you got all the data. Whatever the data says, that’s what it says.”

Shaquille O’Neal admits he’s jealous he isn’t in the GOAT conversation, saying only Michael Jordan, LeBron James, and Kobe Bryant belong there “I would like to be in that conversation.” “No, I’m not. I can’t let you say that.” “I’m not in the GOAT conversation.” “I’m arrogant, but I’m not dumb.” “It’s Kobe, Bron, and Mike.” “We all have our subcategories.” “One of the greatest scorers, most dominant… we all have those.” “But the GOAT of the GOATs? That’s different.” “That’s Lion King.” “My thing is, if you’re gonna have the conversation, have the correct conversation.” “For so long it was just Mike and Bron, and now I’m like, ‘What about Kobe?’” “Now you got all the data. Whatever the data says, that’s what it says.”

Isaac Bassey

27,200 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Sam Altman: "everybody was calling us an idiot" "My highest bit of advice is find the things that you can develop reasonable conviction in that the conventional wisdom says are just wrong. And be okay with it taking a long time and having people be very frustratingly dismissive" "For years at OpenAI, it felt like we knew the biggest secret in the world. Everybody was calling us an idiot, and we had increasing data points to convince ourselves we weren't delusional. It was extremely frustrating. But looking back it was an incredible gift, because it meant we didn't have massive competitors and we had time to build our company" "If you're starting the same startup as everybody else, you get a lot of hype and you can raise a lot of money, but those are much less frequently the big outcomes" "Figure out what the really big brand new thing is that is possible now that wasn't possible a few years ago. The world does not understand how to intuit exponentials, and so they miss it" "If you can figure those out and develop continuing conviction based on more data, be grateful that the world doesn't understand. They will eventually. This is a huge superpower"

Jaynit

10,374 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

28,061 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang says allocating capital to Bitcoin and Ethereum in 2018 is a lot like investing in the AI sector today: "When we launched Paradigm in 2018, a lot of our thesis was that we knew crypto would expand massively. And then there was this open question — should you invest in the core protocols like Bitcoin and Ethereum, or invest in startups?" "Obviously in hindsight, the answer was both." "I think it's a lot like the AI landscape now, with this question of — do you own the model companies, or do you own the application layer on top? In 2018, Bitcoin and Ethereum were like OpenAI and Anthropic, and those are the things to own."

Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang says allocating capital to Bitcoin and Ethereum in 2018 is a lot like investing in the AI sector today: "When we launched Paradigm in 2018, a lot of our thesis was that we knew crypto would expand massively. And then there was this open question — should you invest in the core protocols like Bitcoin and Ethereum, or invest in startups?" "Obviously in hindsight, the answer was both." "I think it's a lot like the AI landscape now, with this question of — do you own the model companies, or do you own the application layer on top? In 2018, Bitcoin and Ethereum were like OpenAI and Anthropic, and those are the things to own."

TBPN

58,410 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Alexandr Wang, founder of Scale AI, on why the most overlooked layer of AI became its biggest competitive advantage: Wang left MIT in 2016 to start Scale AI, becoming the world's youngest self-made billionaire by betting on AI's unglamorous infrastructure layer while others chased flashier opportunities. His framework for understanding AI is simple. There are three major components: "You have compute, which folks like Nvidia work on. You have algorithms which folks like OpenAI or Google or Anthropic build. And then you have data." Compute had Nvidia. Algorithms had the major labs. Data had no one. That's exactly where Wang and his team made their bet: "We recognized early on that data was going to be a limiter. And there was nobody really working on it." What looked like a gap in the market turned out to be the foundation of it. Years later, Wang says every serious player in AI has arrived at the same conclusion: "Fast forward today, everybody I talked to recognizes that data is gold. Whether it's our customers, the major labs like the OpenAIs or the Metas of the world, or large enterprises like Morgan Stanley or Mastercard, or our partnership between Cisco and Scale." Alexandr Wang continues: "Data is going to be what will differentiate and power the next generation of powerful AI capabilities."

Alexandr Wang, founder of Scale AI, on why the most overlooked layer of AI became its biggest competitive advantage: Wang left MIT in 2016 to start Scale AI, becoming the world's youngest self-made billionaire by betting on AI's unglamorous infrastructure layer while others chased flashier opportunities. His framework for understanding AI is simple. There are three major components: "You have compute, which folks like Nvidia work on. You have algorithms which folks like OpenAI or Google or Anthropic build. And then you have data." Compute had Nvidia. Algorithms had the major labs. Data had no one. That's exactly where Wang and his team made their bet: "We recognized early on that data was going to be a limiter. And there was nobody really working on it." What looked like a gap in the market turned out to be the foundation of it. Years later, Wang says every serious player in AI has arrived at the same conclusion: "Fast forward today, everybody I talked to recognizes that data is gold. Whether it's our customers, the major labs like the OpenAIs or the Metas of the world, or large enterprises like Morgan Stanley or Mastercard, or our partnership between Cisco and Scale." Alexandr Wang continues: "Data is going to be what will differentiate and power the next generation of powerful AI capabilities."

Big Brain AI

11,442 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад