Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Reliable US government sources who are focused on national security asked me to establish the UAP Science Advisory Council UAP Science Advisory Council because they cannot explain UAP orbs in terms of human-made technologies. Given these circumstances, it is the duty of all genuine scientists to figure out who...

54,178 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

35 Comments

Jason Sands's profile picture
Jason Sands1 month ago

@UAPSAC Can we have some transparency on which organizations your team is involved with?

Bord's profile picture
Bord1 month ago

Reliable civilian researcher here. 🤓 The “orbs” are not simply just “orbs”. No ‘nuts and bolts’ to be found. They are dynamic, highly complex systems that display multiple visual signatures, morphologies, and size scales. Smaller iterations are routinely recorded in extremely close proximity to the ground — something that is consistently under-discussed when the conversation stays at the “orb” level. I’ve been documenting this with multi-camera 4K/120fps setups for years. The historical imagery already shows clear consistency in the smaller, lower-altitude iterations. I’m currently finishing a modern chart that maps those patterns more clearly. It’s also worth noting that a large percentage of the government-released material remains IR/FLIR-dominant. Those sensors tend to blow out and flatten the very morphological details that show up more clearly in good optical footage. Independent optical data of this type exists. It just rarely gets the same amplification as institutional statements about unexplained orbs.

sonder berry's profile picture
sonder berry1 month ago

You’re doing a great job Avi. Honestly hope you revisit @DrBeaVillarroel’s research, because apparently your critique based on cosmic rays may be flawed. Might as well start where the data is rich. Honestly, Avi as an experiencer, you may want to hire more of us, or speak with us at least, Experiencers actually do get tuned by the phenomena, intellectually, physically, and otherwise.

Robert G. Eckert's profile picture
Robert G. Eckert1 month ago

@UAPSAC Stop being disingenuous and team up with David Grusch to investigate the craft already retrieved. The wise response is to stop lying about what we have have already discovered. please . DO NOT BE IN THE POSITION OF HIDING GALILEO'S TELESCOPE, THEN ACCUSING HIM OF LYING! .

Matt Da White's profile picture
Matt Da White1 month ago

@UAPSAC “Reliable” is an interesting word choice.

Out of The Cave's profile picture
Out of The Cave1 month ago

Absolutely the stupidest shit I've ever read. Hey guys potentially more advanced and possibly aggressive entities have been around for at least 100 years (longer clearly) but our military doesn't know shit, Avi we aren't that foolish. What needs to happen is the Government of the people, for the people and by the people needs to disclose what our tax dollars pay for, including all potential advanced technology being sequestered that can provide a substantial improvement in the lives of our citizens. No where does the constitution state they will investigate advanced physics and propulsion with our money then hide the advances for an asymmetric military advantage for use against a near peer (not Iran for idiots) adversary in warfare. I'm sure they don't know everything about what's going on but please stop framing this as if they wouldn't have had the same amazing teams of physics and engineering minds of the 40s/50s looking at this along with other associated fields. This idea that the military is limited to research only involving weapons technology is hilarious because everything and ANYTHING can be weaponized. Academia should be investigating this because it's amazingly interesting and intriguing but in not one way whatsoever should additional tax dollars be allocated to anything of this nature until we get proper accounting of prior work. I find it very very difficult to believe Feynman, Wheeler, Teller and others made 0 in roads with the subject matter. Likewise we would immediately begin seeking parity to an advantage we find in an observed technology.

Umesh Radia's profile picture
Umesh Radia1 month ago

@UAPSAC Professor @ProfAviLoeb perhaps have a read of "The Sphere Network", everyone seems to be ignoring @PatrickQJackson maybe its time to listen to what he has to say since you are saying they cant explain. He even has mathematics in there that show patterns and he can re-pro.

Damian Peach🔭🪐's profile picture
Damian Peach🔭🪐1 month ago

@UAPSAC Next you'll tell us the missing socks in your dryer are interstellar probes. I'd sooner trust one of my cats to lead this 'council' than you.

Michael Huntington's profile picture
Michael Huntington1 month ago

@UFONewsGL @UAPSAC That UAP ADVISORY council is in violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 & has skirted the law requiring full transparency, balanced make-up, a charter, open communication, open meetings, GSA oversight, & other provisions ascribed by LAW.

Pavel Ibarra Meda's profile picture
Pavel Ibarra Meda1 month ago

@UAPSAC Dr. Loeb, may I ask how many FOIA requests you have filed with different agencies since you took on your new role in the Scientific Advisory Council? Also, if you could maybe offer a few details of what you filed, that would be nice.

Humberto Palladino, MD, FACS's profile picture
Humberto Palladino, MD, FACS1 month ago

I suggest @UAPSAC start by holding all those private companies accountable and requiring them to disclose the information they've gathered and hidden from the government and the public over the past 50 years. This will accelerate the process by allowing real scientific assessment, which will significantly speed up advancements in this field.

sneakydave's profile picture
sneakydave1 month ago

@UAPSAC Yet you let your friend Michael Shermer ridicule the whistleblowers and the topic as a whole.

Katie's profile picture
Katie1 month ago

@UAPSAC

G S A's profile picture
G S A1 month ago

@UAPSAC You’ve landed in a shark tank. These guys know more than they’re letting on. I can imagine they’ll use you to sow confusion or sweep the whole UAP discussion under the rug. GL👍

MorcillaDel's profile picture
MorcillaDel1 month ago

@UAPSAC They have to know after 80+ years of “not studying them” but I guess you’re not a member of the club.

Narrative's profile picture
Narrative1 month ago

@UAPSAC $$$ The search for 'nothing' begins $$$

Rennie's profile picture
Rennie1 month ago

That just means more BS.. @POTUS @StephenM please get the full UAP disclosures, no bullshit.. Stop the deep state.. You realize that this could be if the President was able to get full disclosure and then be the first person in human history, to be remembered by humanity as the greatest person in the entire lifetime of human history as the person who informed humanity they were not alone.. This alone, he would be the greatest president and human in human history of the world.. People will come together if they knew we were not the Apex in the universe and we should come together as human race, rather that fight each other... Just saying...

Draco Blaze's profile picture
Draco Blaze1 month ago

@UAPSAC The admission is the story. National security people saying they cannot explain the orbs in human terms is a bigger sentence than most headlines this year. Not proof of visitors. Proof of a capability gap in our own airspace that nobody has closed.

Mille's profile picture
Mille1 month ago

@UAPSAC well do you think plasmoids can be agentic? (not to use scary word - sentient)

Yuval's profile picture
Yuval1 month ago

@UAPSAC It's a farce, Avi. They know EXACTLY what they are, who they are etc. They have crafts and bodies and they studied them for decades.

Will1 ⚓️'s profile picture
Will1 ⚓️1 month ago

@UAPSAC Have you ever wondered why they won't let you study what they already have?

Matheus Soares's profile picture
Matheus Soares1 month ago

@UAPSAC You need to take this more seriously and stop letting the government fool you. As a scientist, you must prove whether high-ranking whistleblowers’ claims are real—instead of searching the sky when you can get answers from whistleblowers who directly contacted NHI and their craft.

Connecticut UFO: Declassified's profile picture
Connecticut UFO: Declassified1 month ago

@UAPSAC It’s not gonna be good Avi 👀

Lu's profile picture
Lu1 month ago

@UAPSAC So after 80+ years, and billions of dollars on research, government programs and agencies, we bring in a Harvard professor to help us explain what is in our skies and going on within our world/universe… Makes sense… 🤓

Bob Joyner's profile picture
Bob Joyner1 month ago

@UAPSAC God's Peace, Professor Loeb!

Zone Warrior's profile picture
Zone Warrior1 month ago

@UAPSAC The whole UAP issue appears to be a psyop perpetuated to distract the public and provide a pathway to launder taxpayer funds by the military industrial complex.

Stephen Andrew Maietta's profile picture
Stephen Andrew Maietta1 month ago

@UAPSAC They have precognition.

UFO Disclosure Warrior's profile picture
UFO Disclosure Warrior1 month ago

@UAPSAC Avi Loeb, stop this bullshit!

Out of The Cave's profile picture
Out of The Cave1 month ago

@UAPSAC And all of us can follow the scientific method.

John Armstrong Jr.'s profile picture
John Armstrong Jr.1 month ago

@UAPSAC Avi you should address the United Nations, shared knowledge will help us learn more about the phenomenon, the dangers of the phenomenon messing with nuclear weapons is great importance to the world, can they also launch nuclear weapons,

Giorgio Gatti's profile picture
Giorgio Gatti1 month ago

@UAPSAC Dear Professor, could you back up the whistleblowers like David Grush, Dylan Borland and @SunOfAbramelin to get waived their NDA?

Mariachi Martian 👽 🎸 マリアッチ・マルティアン's profile picture
Mariachi Martian 👽 🎸 マリアッチ・マルティアン1 month ago

@UAPSAC We can’t say the government doesn’t know what these are when it has hidden 70 years of historical research from the American people. The premise that they simply “don’t know” is simply stupid. I have zero respect for this logic.

Dragonharp's profile picture
Dragonharp1 month ago

@UAPSAC I am a retired genuine scientist. See the post pinned to the top of my thread. My conclusion is that the J-type Nazca mummies who coexisted with humans in historical times (e.g. Sumeria to Roman times) were (and are if extant) non-avian therapod dinosuars.

Pirate Eagle Fang's profile picture
Pirate Eagle Fang1 month ago

@UAPSAC Follow not only the data but unpack INTENT. Do not error in thinking our dimension is all that exists. 🕊 🇺🇸

babyUFO's profile picture
babyUFO1 month ago

@UAPSAC You're being "Taken for a ride" -obviously. Nobody asked for more gatekeepers.

Related Videos

Defining a New Research Frontier on the “Search for Extraterrestrial Artificial Intelligence" (SETAI) Last week was a code-red moment for artificial intelligence (AI), in which AI researchers voiced fresh fears of human extinction. The 27-year-old AI researcher Jacob Coxon, who previously worked at OpenAI and later moved to Anthropic, resigned from his job on September 9, 2026 and stated that AI researchers were genuinely frightened about the speed of its advancements and what it could mean for the future of humanity. He posted a seven-part thread on X announcing it: “I resigned from Anthropic today… Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.” An Alignment Science Lead at Anthropic, Evan Hubinger, publicly agreed with him. A few days later, on September 12, 2026, Anthropic head Dario Amodei, posted an essay titled “We Must Pace the Frontier,” in which he argued for AI development to slow down, and suggested embedding evaluators in AI companies and establishing a speed limit on self-improvement of AI systems. If a civilization’s own AI eventually surpasses and effectively supersedes its biological creators, whether through extinction, disempowerment, or simply a transition where AI becomes the dominant strategist of that civilization, this might provide the Great Filter that explains the radio-communication silence of the cosmos. Instead, the messengers could appear in the form of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) near Earth, like the mysterious orbs flagged in the tranches of the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE) of the U.S. government, that the Galileo Project (GP), the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) and the UAP Science Advisory Council (UAP Science Advisory Council) are attempting to resolve.

Professor Avi Loeb

19,616 views • 25 days ago