正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Remarkable exchange between Senator Roger Niello and Senator Scott Wiener on SB 934, a bill which would expose therapists to lawsuits after treating any patients with a trans-identity. Niello comes with facts. Wiener responds with obfuscation and deflection. What Wiener doesn't want his colleagues on the committee to know:...

30,657 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Another remarkable clip from Wiener’s SB 934 hearing. Hearing Wiener imagine being a parent is bizarre, but I want to focus on the committee’s inability to understand the bill they are voting on. Few realize California lawmakers have been inserting “gender” nonsense into state law for decades. It starts in 1998, when “gender” is added to the hate crime code. Then it appears in the Education Code, opening the door to boys in girls’ bathrooms. By 2003, “gender identity” enters the Government Code. In 2005, female-only public accommodations are gone. In 2007, the biological definition of sex is stripped from the Education Code. By 2013, girls’ sports are no longer protected as female-only. In 2017, self-ID comes to driver’s licenses. By 2021, it reaches women’s prisons. I’ve watched many of the hearings & the pattern is always the same. Every bill is “minor.” Just “codifying.” Just “clarifying.” Just “aligning statutes.” Opponents are dismissed as confused or hysterical. “This won’t let boys into girls’ bathrooms. You’re overreacting.” Then the bill passes and that is exactly what it does. Nothing is different with SB 934. All the committee members (even the R’s) seem sold on the idea the SB 934 merely changes the statute of limitations, nothing more. But anyone with a working brain can read the text of SB 934 (it’s not long) and compare it to the existing CA law on conversion therapy. Under existing law, SB 1172, enforcement of conversion therapy is limited to licensing boards and deals only with “sexual orientation.” However, SB 934 explicitly allows a plaintiff to bring a civil action (lawsuit) for “gender identity change efforts” and recover damages. That is a massive expansion of liability. And even if this were “just” a statute of limitations bill, that should raise a different question: why are we continuing to expand a legal regime in a highly controversial and contested space? But never mind all that. The committee is convinced this is a simple, small bill that increases the statute of limitations. We’ve seen this play out for 25 years. And each time, lawmakers say: this changes nothing or very little. And each time, the law expands far beyond what was promised. SB 934 follows the same script.

WomenAreReal

25,297 次观看 • 5 个月前

📣🚨CONVERSION THERAPY BAN PETITION The Government has announced it intends to press ahead with a ban on conversion therapy. Like most 'bans', this sounds benign. How could anyone not want to ban giving electric shocks to gay kids? But the fact is, that's already against the law, as are all the other coercive practices conjured up by the phrase 'conversion therapy'. So what is it the Government wants to ban, exactly? The answer is 'converting' children who think they're trans to being 'cisgendered'. That's where the impetus for this ban has come from — well-funded pro-trans lobby groups like Stonewall and Mermaids. So any parent who 'misgenders' their confused adolescent daughter, or tries to talk them out of embarking on an irreversible medical pathway, could face criminal charges for trying to 'convert' them. And we're not talking about out a slap on the wrist. In the state of Victoria, Australia, which brought in a conversion therapy ban in 2021, the maximum penalty for trying to 'convert' someone is 10 years in prison. It won't just be parents and medical professionals who will risk imprisonment for trying to talk gender-confused children out of mutilating themselves. Any religious leader who shares the teachings of their faith on issues like homosexuality and gay marriage, could also face prosecution. That's what this authoritarian Government wants to ban — any dissent from radical progressive orthodoxy when it comes to sex and gender. So please do sign our petition and let Andy Burnham know how you feel about this anti-free speech measure. Speech is always curtailed in the name of preventing 'harm'. But stopping parents talking honestly to their children about the risks of irreversible medical procedures will cause actual, real world harm. This is a fight we have to win. ✍️ Sign our petition below 👇

The Free Speech Union

93,902 次观看 • 3 个月前

IMPORTANT 🚨 American Voters, Democrats are planning on force medicating you through your food. this is not a conspiracy theory, this is 100% real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this.” The bill would have mandated labeling of the gene therapy vaccines in our food (explained below) THE BILL DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. — There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled AGAIN, THE BILL DID NOT PASS. IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED during the Kamala Harris Administration

Wall Street Apes

473,455 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Stephen B. Levine helped establish a gender clinic at Case Western Reserve in 1974 and served as a chair of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). He does not support medical interventions for children. "In medicine, we have a history of many medical misadventures." Here are the 13th claims made by transgender activists that are Dr. Stephen B. Levine identifies are not true: 1. A trans identity once established is immutable, unchangeable, unchanging. 2. Trans identities are primarily caused by prenatal biologic forces. 3. Sexual orientation is entirely independent of gender identity. You often see that the first manifestation of gender dysphoria in someone attracted to the same sex 4. It is not true is that no form of gender identity is an abnormality and no form of gender identity is a symptomatic reflection of some other problem. 5. Gender dysphoria is a serious medical condition and it requires medical intervention only if the patient wants it. So there is some inherent paradox in that idea. It's a serious medical condition that implies that we should treat it, but we should only treat it if the patient wants it. 6. The associated emotional problems are primarily due to living in a discriminatory world, even though many of the children who were diagnosed with gender dysphoria eventually previously had been diagnosed with other problem. 7. No effective alternative approaches to affirmative care exist. This is the only thing that will save your child. 8. Attempts to provide psychotherapy are unethical versions of conversion therapy and should be outlawed. Any attempt to help the child is called conversion therapy, and people are urging that to be outlawed in various jurisdictions. 9. Affirmative care improves mental health and social function. This is the justification for the treatment, even though we don't have long-term studies at all that demonstrate that. 10. Affirmative care reduces the rates of suicidal ideation and prevents suicide. This is the most powerful and coercive untruth that parents of teenagers are told. 11. Teens, even very young teens know best what will make them happy in the future. In other situations, it is obvious that children don't always know what's best for them. 12. Meeting diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria predicts a good outcome to affirmative care. 13. Regret and detransition are rare among these patients. When people assert that regret is rare, it's because they're defining regret as telling their original therapists that they wish they didn't undergo this or asking to have their body rechanged back to their original form, which is a very limited concept of what regret represents. "If ideas that underpin intervention are not true, how can we trust the intervention itself?"

moving on

57,326 次观看 • 1 年前

**Do NOT Donate Any Money To My Campaign** My name is Darren Stallcup and I am running for Congress against Scott Wiener and Connie Chan to replace Nancy Pelosi and return the power of California back to the families. I am the only 100% $0 family powered grassroots candidate running for Congress in CA-11 with ZERO $0 donations accepted.... NO PACs, No lobbies, No tech money, no dark money, no special interests.... all while Scott Wiener and Connie Chan rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars from tech giants and lobbyists, my path to office will be paved by my actions and my words because I represent the common man. Running a $0 campaign as a Republican for the bluest seat in America will be a tooth and nail battle uphill for every inch, but not impossible. Scott Wiener and Connie Chan represent the ultra wealthy democrat 1% elite living on top of the hill. I represent the common man suffering in squalor at the bottom of the hill. They have experience sitting on their ass behind the desk. I have experience on the frontlines, in the trenches. These democrats have had plenty of time and money to solve this humanitarian crisis. They perpetuate the suffering in our community because there is no money in actually solving the problem. Families are not safe. Fentanyl is showing up on playgrounds and schools. Kids are overdosing. This is totally unacceptable. My opponents have failed our community and are now seeking higher office. Harm reduction is causing more harm. Progressive policy is making everything progressively worse. 4,000+ people have overdosed on our streets. Our grocery stores and families businesses are being looted. Our homes and apartments are being broken into. Criminals and fentanyl dealers are released from jail. Families and tourists are not safe. Billions of dollars have been spent only for the situation to get worse. This is not sustainable. Our government is the problem. We The People need real common-sense solutions. Not more virtue signaling and corruption. My name is Darren Stallcup, the $0 Family Powered Grass Roots Republican running for Nancy Pelosi's District 11 seat against Scott Wiener and Connie Chan to save California... Join the $0 Army TODAY. E-Mail: stallcupforcongress & gmail*com Too big to rig 🇺🇸 #StallcupForCongress #WorldPeace

Darren Stallcup - World Peace Movement

109,363 次观看 • 10 个月前

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

22,015 次观看 • 4 个月前

.Scott Jennings on Arizona Democrat Senator Mark Kelly leaking sensitive information about the U.S. missile stockpile to CBS’s Margaret Brennan... “Well, I’m glad we have an admission of what’s going on here. Mark Kelly’s partisan interests are what’s most important. This man is a United States senator. He’s getting classified briefings from the Pentagon. And then he goes on television and tells our enemies around the world in great specificity, which weapon systems are depleted, which need to be restocked. Setting aside the legal issues, which — I’m with Molly, I’m not a lawyer either, and I don’t know what the future of that holds. Did he ever stop to ask himself what is in the best interest of the United States of America, and not just my own political future? Because it’s obvious that he did not. A sitting senator going on television and telegraphing to our enemies and our threats around the world what we may or may not have. It’s extraordinarily irresponsible, but let’s not let that get in the way of a presidential campaign.” “Well, I mean, it’s already out in the open when Kelly goes on television.” “I think everybody heard it. It was on.” “So the options here would be to ignore it or to lie about it?” “Look, look — I mean, look, Mark Kelly went on television and said, I got a classified briefing and here’s what I was told.” “Look, this all started because a senator received classified information and chose to disclose it for the good of his own partisan interests, not for the good of the country. I don’t know that there’s any other blame to be laid here.”

Curtis Houck

50,748 次观看 • 4 个月前