Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Renee good still had a pulse when paramedics showed up. Every second counts. Instead of helping her, as the law requires, ICE gave each other high-fives and tried to violate the First Amendment rights of bystanders taking video. This has legal implications that matter. Awful.

hissgoescobra's profile picture

John Jackson

51,841 subscribers

41,440 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I swear DHS recruited a bunch of frustrated former high school bullies as ICE agents. And they really had to explain to them that hurt feelings don’t justify brute force. LEAKED: After the ICE shooting of Renee Good, agents in Minneapolis received a mandatory “legal refresher” on civil rights and use of force.
0:29

I swear DHS recruited a bunch of frustrated former high school bullies as ICE agents. And they really had to explain to them that hurt feelings don’t justify brute force. LEAKED: After the ICE shooting of Renee Good, agents in Minneapolis received a mandatory “legal refresher” on civil rights and use of force.

Christopher Webb

20,689 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

We’ve all seen the video. An ICE officer shot Renee Good as she tried to drive away—then agents rendered no aid and left the scene. And instead of accountability, the Trump admin. smeared her as a domestic terrorist. This demands consequences. Noem has to resign, and I'm calling for her impeachment.
2:02

We’ve all seen the video. An ICE officer shot Renee Good as she tried to drive away—then agents rendered no aid and left the scene. And instead of accountability, the Trump admin. smeared her as a domestic terrorist. This demands consequences. Noem has to resign, and I'm calling for her impeachment.

Steve Cohen

298,703 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This DOJ Civil Rights Division Division’s Second Amendment Section is firmly protecting every law-abiding citizen’s right to carry. These rights do not protect themselves, & U.S. Department of Justice & this administration will ensure that the Second Amendment is NOT a second-class right!
2:01

This DOJ Civil Rights Division Division’s Second Amendment Section is firmly protecting every law-abiding citizen’s right to carry. These rights do not protect themselves, & U.S. Department of Justice & this administration will ensure that the Second Amendment is NOT a second-class right!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

50,106 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An agent approaches him. The man backs away, does not interfere, does not block agents, and does not make physical contact. Despite this, the agent says: “Do you think this is a big game? Is this a game to you guys? That’s why that lady got hurt the other day.” That statement matters. The agent is threatening a U.S. citizen with lethal force for protected speech. That is illegal. Law enforcement cannot threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against civilians for exercising First Amendment rights. He said this to a man who was unarmed, on foot, and not posing any immediate threat. By the agent’s own words, Renee Good was not shot because of self-defense, but because she was drawing attention to ICE’s presence. That is not a lawful justification for using deadly force. This video shows constitutional violations in real time: • First Amendment retaliation • Threats of violence without legal cause • Abuse of authority under color of law I don’t know how many more videos need to come out before accountability happens. When federal agents threaten to kill Americans for making noise, the law has already been broken… and the Constitution is being treated as optional.
0:46

🚨BREAKING: Once again, ICE agents are admitting, on camera, that Renee Good was not shot in self-defense. In the video, a U.S. citizen is driving when he sees ICE agents. He stops his car, exits, and begins blowing a whistle… a lawful act protected by the First Amendment. An agent approaches him. The man backs away, does not interfere, does not block agents, and does not make physical contact. Despite this, the agent says: “Do you think this is a big game? Is this a game to you guys? That’s why that lady got hurt the other day.” That statement matters. The agent is threatening a U.S. citizen with lethal force for protected speech. That is illegal. Law enforcement cannot threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against civilians for exercising First Amendment rights. He said this to a man who was unarmed, on foot, and not posing any immediate threat. By the agent’s own words, Renee Good was not shot because of self-defense, but because she was drawing attention to ICE’s presence. That is not a lawful justification for using deadly force. This video shows constitutional violations in real time: • First Amendment retaliation • Threats of violence without legal cause • Abuse of authority under color of law I don’t know how many more videos need to come out before accountability happens. When federal agents threaten to kill Americans for making noise, the law has already been broken… and the Constitution is being treated as optional.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,231,691 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The US Department of Homeland Security released a new video showing the moments leading up to the shooting of Renee Nicole Good. They said this shows ‘the anti-ICE agitator was stalking and impeding a law enforcement operation’.
1:24

The US Department of Homeland Security released a new video showing the moments leading up to the shooting of Renee Nicole Good. They said this shows ‘the anti-ICE agitator was stalking and impeding a law enforcement operation’.

Sky News

52,602 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Three clips showing the murder of Renee Nicole Good Clip 1: You can see Renee Nicole Good wave three times to the ICE cars to go past. One of them did, the second one chose to stop Clip 2: When the second ICE car stopped, Renee Nicole Good with her car window open shouts to ICE "I'm pulling out" Clip 3: As she's pulling out, not driving into anybody, she's murdered by ICE These three clips clearly shows unnecessary aggression by ICE, and her murder What's disturbing is that President Trump, JD Vance, Kristi Noem and others, who are meant to stand up for the safety of the American people, have instead chosen to misrepresent the video footage, claim the victim was a terrorist, and that she was attacking ICE; she wasn't and didn't A plea to Trump, Vance, Noem and others, acknowledge you've got this wrong, and help mend your country 🙏 Benjamin Franklin once said, "Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are" - America needs to do better
0:20

Three clips showing the murder of Renee Nicole Good Clip 1: You can see Renee Nicole Good wave three times to the ICE cars to go past. One of them did, the second one chose to stop Clip 2: When the second ICE car stopped, Renee Nicole Good with her car window open shouts to ICE "I'm pulling out" Clip 3: As she's pulling out, not driving into anybody, she's murdered by ICE These three clips clearly shows unnecessary aggression by ICE, and her murder What's disturbing is that President Trump, JD Vance, Kristi Noem and others, who are meant to stand up for the safety of the American people, have instead chosen to misrepresent the video footage, claim the victim was a terrorist, and that she was attacking ICE; she wasn't and didn't A plea to Trump, Vance, Noem and others, acknowledge you've got this wrong, and help mend your country 🙏 Benjamin Franklin once said, "Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are" - America needs to do better

Farrukh

799,025 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The FBI agent that started the Civil rights investigation into the murder of Renee Nicole Good by ICE agent Johnathan Ross has just resigned after her Superiors tried to make her change course on the investigation and she wouldn’t do it because she knew it wasn’t right.
1:05

The FBI agent that started the Civil rights investigation into the murder of Renee Nicole Good by ICE agent Johnathan Ross has just resigned after her Superiors tried to make her change course on the investigation and she wouldn’t do it because she knew it wasn’t right.

Suzie rizzio

26,447 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

⚖️A new form of UNRESTRICTED LAWFARE? Are politically-guided civil rights lawyers weaponizing their individual First Amendment rights to spew harmful misinformation? Does this misinformation tend to encourage unlawful, dangerous confrontations? Under the shield of commentary Jenin Younes, national legal director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Council, incorrectly and absurdly advised X readers that ICE officers had “no law enforcement authority over” Renee Good, and “no authority to search a U.S. citizen or arrest her.” Younes, a former appellate advocate for indigent criminal defendants, prefaces her commentary with her credentials, framing herself as a neutral expert: “I’m a former defense attorney and currently a civil liberties attorney with no political dog in this fight.” Admitting she has “the right to change” her opinion “if additional information changes the calculus,” Younes says she has reviewed early video of the tragic confrontation between Renee Good and ICE and confidently asserts: “It is very clear that the officers instigated the confrontation.” As a trained attorney myself, I am astounded at Younes’ willingness to risk her reputation on such a strange hill without first investigating the facts of what occurred BEFORE the scene that emerges from the 9-second video clips. But what’s more astonishing (and frankly shocking) are Younes’ statements of law that are dangerously, absurdly incorrect. In the first wave of commentary about the encounter, many inferred Good was free to leave the scene — despite audio in some clips with the voice of an agent shouting to Good, “get out of the f—— vehicle!” There is no “right to flee” a law enforcement encounter simply because one believes it may be unlawful. And there is no reason to believe the encounter was unlawful. Because contrary to Younes’ assertions, ICE agents in the course of executing their enforcement duties have statutory authority to stop, question, detain and arrest U.S. citizens, codified at 8 U.S. Code § 1357(a)(5). For activists who seek to exercise their First Amendment rights, civil rights attorneys like Younes should advise on the limits of their rights to protest lawfully and on how to protest safely. And they should make it clear that actively interfering with ICE activities is absolutely outside the bounds of Constitutionally protected expression. Under Younes’ view, the assertion that ICE officers have “no law enforcement authority over” U.S. citizens tends to suggest that citizens can interfere with their operations or commit crimes against them with impunity. Clearly that is not the case. Statements from Good’s family members and eyewitnesses suggest that Good had coordinated with local activists and was consciously leading or participating in an operation to obstruct ICE by blocking the road with their vehicles. Obviously, investigation is ongoing, and more facts will come to light. I agree with Younes on one thing: Renee Good should not have died. If Renee had had a proper understanding of the law, and of the dangerousness of putting herself physically between ICE and the execution of their law enforcement duties, the 37-year-old mom might have thought twice before taking part. Was it foreseeable? Could a mistaken belief that the law does not apply to her, in someone who adheres to zealous anti-ICE ideology, be the catalyst to radicalize a mom to commit an act of obstruction, sabotage or terrorism? Being in a vehicle may have enhanced the dangerousness compared to anti-ICE activism we saw in 2025, where protestors blocked roads with their bodies. Driving a 2-ton vehicle means Renee was operating a potentially lethal weapon, justifying lethal force in a self-defense situation. Does Younes have a “political dog in this fight”? Glenn Greenwald touts Younes’ work combatting censorship, leading a lawsuit against the Biden administration, as evidence of her lack of political bias. But to assume, on the basis of minimal evidence, that ICE agents must be held accountable for “overreach” is the very definition of prejudice: to hold a preconceived opinion. Lawyers have opinions. But a preconceived opinion against law enforcement in this context strongly suggests a political agenda. Does Younes’ misstatement of law suggest a new form of “unrestricted lawfare”? You decide.
1:05

⚖️A new form of UNRESTRICTED LAWFARE? Are politically-guided civil rights lawyers weaponizing their individual First Amendment rights to spew harmful misinformation? Does this misinformation tend to encourage unlawful, dangerous confrontations? Under the shield of commentary Jenin Younes, national legal director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Council, incorrectly and absurdly advised X readers that ICE officers had “no law enforcement authority over” Renee Good, and “no authority to search a U.S. citizen or arrest her.” Younes, a former appellate advocate for indigent criminal defendants, prefaces her commentary with her credentials, framing herself as a neutral expert: “I’m a former defense attorney and currently a civil liberties attorney with no political dog in this fight.” Admitting she has “the right to change” her opinion “if additional information changes the calculus,” Younes says she has reviewed early video of the tragic confrontation between Renee Good and ICE and confidently asserts: “It is very clear that the officers instigated the confrontation.” As a trained attorney myself, I am astounded at Younes’ willingness to risk her reputation on such a strange hill without first investigating the facts of what occurred BEFORE the scene that emerges from the 9-second video clips. But what’s more astonishing (and frankly shocking) are Younes’ statements of law that are dangerously, absurdly incorrect. In the first wave of commentary about the encounter, many inferred Good was free to leave the scene — despite audio in some clips with the voice of an agent shouting to Good, “get out of the f—— vehicle!” There is no “right to flee” a law enforcement encounter simply because one believes it may be unlawful. And there is no reason to believe the encounter was unlawful. Because contrary to Younes’ assertions, ICE agents in the course of executing their enforcement duties have statutory authority to stop, question, detain and arrest U.S. citizens, codified at 8 U.S. Code § 1357(a)(5). For activists who seek to exercise their First Amendment rights, civil rights attorneys like Younes should advise on the limits of their rights to protest lawfully and on how to protest safely. And they should make it clear that actively interfering with ICE activities is absolutely outside the bounds of Constitutionally protected expression. Under Younes’ view, the assertion that ICE officers have “no law enforcement authority over” U.S. citizens tends to suggest that citizens can interfere with their operations or commit crimes against them with impunity. Clearly that is not the case. Statements from Good’s family members and eyewitnesses suggest that Good had coordinated with local activists and was consciously leading or participating in an operation to obstruct ICE by blocking the road with their vehicles. Obviously, investigation is ongoing, and more facts will come to light. I agree with Younes on one thing: Renee Good should not have died. If Renee had had a proper understanding of the law, and of the dangerousness of putting herself physically between ICE and the execution of their law enforcement duties, the 37-year-old mom might have thought twice before taking part. Was it foreseeable? Could a mistaken belief that the law does not apply to her, in someone who adheres to zealous anti-ICE ideology, be the catalyst to radicalize a mom to commit an act of obstruction, sabotage or terrorism? Being in a vehicle may have enhanced the dangerousness compared to anti-ICE activism we saw in 2025, where protestors blocked roads with their bodies. Driving a 2-ton vehicle means Renee was operating a potentially lethal weapon, justifying lethal force in a self-defense situation. Does Younes have a “political dog in this fight”? Glenn Greenwald touts Younes’ work combatting censorship, leading a lawsuit against the Biden administration, as evidence of her lack of political bias. But to assume, on the basis of minimal evidence, that ICE agents must be held accountable for “overreach” is the very definition of prejudice: to hold a preconceived opinion. Lawyers have opinions. But a preconceived opinion against law enforcement in this context strongly suggests a political agenda. Does Younes’ misstatement of law suggest a new form of “unrestricted lawfare”? You decide.

Amy Suzanne Martin MA JD

235,531 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

WATCH: “Renee Good should still be with us. And we should say we must ABOLISH ICE.” REP. Rep. Justin Jones honors Renee Good on the house floor — then Rep. Susan Lynn prays for ICE agents, one of which shot her 3x in the head as she tried to flee.
1:15

WATCH: “Renee Good should still be with us. And we should say we must ABOLISH ICE.” REP. Rep. Justin Jones honors Renee Good on the house floor — then Rep. Susan Lynn prays for ICE agents, one of which shot her 3x in the head as she tried to flee.

The Tennessee Holler

21,222 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Whitney Lynn was preaching the word of God on the sidewalk when this police officer tried to infringe on her first amendment rights. He quickly gets humbled and they pray together.
1:47

Whitney Lynn was preaching the word of God on the sidewalk when this police officer tried to infringe on her first amendment rights. He quickly gets humbled and they pray together.

AmericanPapaBear™

93,382 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The law requires an "Election Day," not an "Election Week." or "Election Month" -- counting ballots that arrive days and weeks after Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud! Illinois counts ballots that arrive up to 14 DAYS after Election Day, even without a postmark. Heavy lifting Judicial Watch ⚖️ has an appellate argument this week our legal challenge to this law....
0:35

The law requires an "Election Day," not an "Election Week." or "Election Month" -- counting ballots that arrive days and weeks after Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud! Illinois counts ballots that arrive up to 14 DAYS after Election Day, even without a postmark. Heavy lifting Judicial Watch ⚖️ has an appellate argument this week our legal challenge to this law....

Tom Fitton

388,293 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨CRIME PAYS! This is wild folks. On Jan. 7, during a federal ICE operation in Minneapolis, an agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good after she attempted to use her vehicle against an officer. Renee was in her SUV when an ICE agent fired multiple shots, killing her. Federal officials report it as self-defense, saying she tried to use her car against the officer in question but may disagree, seeing Renee as a victim of unjust force. Meanwhile, a GoFundMe for the ICE agent’s legal defense has sparked outrage but critics point out it may violate GoFundMe policy, while ironically a separate fundraiser for Renee’s family topped over $1.5M. Dolly Parton has offered to support Good’s family financially as well. What do you folks think about this situation?
0:44

🚨CRIME PAYS! This is wild folks. On Jan. 7, during a federal ICE operation in Minneapolis, an agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good after she attempted to use her vehicle against an officer. Renee was in her SUV when an ICE agent fired multiple shots, killing her. Federal officials report it as self-defense, saying she tried to use her car against the officer in question but may disagree, seeing Renee as a victim of unjust force. Meanwhile, a GoFundMe for the ICE agent’s legal defense has sparked outrage but critics point out it may violate GoFundMe policy, while ironically a separate fundraiser for Renee’s family topped over $1.5M. Dolly Parton has offered to support Good’s family financially as well. What do you folks think about this situation?

David Nino Rodriguez

14,909 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

MN Doctor: I learned that Renee Good still had a pulse 8 minutes after she was shot by an ICE agent. And yet the offer to administer aid from a physician on the scene was denied. I can't say how much that stirs the blood of everyone behind me here as we try to fulfill our oath and duty to care for the people of Minnesota.
0:38

MN Doctor: I learned that Renee Good still had a pulse 8 minutes after she was shot by an ICE agent. And yet the offer to administer aid from a physician on the scene was denied. I can't say how much that stirs the blood of everyone behind me here as we try to fulfill our oath and duty to care for the people of Minnesota.

FactPost

3,178,478 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

MN Doctor: I learned that Renee Good still had a pulse 8 minutes after she was shot by an ICE agent. And yet the offer to administer aid from a physician on the scene was denied. I can't say how much that stirs the blood of everyone behind me here as we try to fulfill our oath and duty to care for the people of Minnesota.
0:38

MN Doctor: I learned that Renee Good still had a pulse 8 minutes after she was shot by an ICE agent. And yet the offer to administer aid from a physician on the scene was denied. I can't say how much that stirs the blood of everyone behind me here as we try to fulfill our oath and duty to care for the people of Minnesota.

Rachel Bitecofer 🗽🦆

53,031 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Khanna: They don't abide by the Fourth Amendment. They don't abide by the Second Amendment. They killed Alex Pretti because he had a gun… and they don't abide by the First Amendment. They're shooting people for engaging engaging in the First Amendment right to peaceful protests. They are violating every aspect of our Bill of Rights,
0:51

Khanna: They don't abide by the Fourth Amendment. They don't abide by the Second Amendment. They killed Alex Pretti because he had a gun… and they don't abide by the First Amendment. They're shooting people for engaging engaging in the First Amendment right to peaceful protests. They are violating every aspect of our Bill of Rights,

Acyn

37,499 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

This woman is not a serious law enforcement professional. She’s more like a partisan Democrat wearing a badge. Instead of minding her own business, Renee Good interfered with ICE while they were lawfully doing their jobs. Law enforcement doesn’t just get to pick and choose which laws they like based on politics. When officers start playing activist instead of enforcing the law, they become part of the problem. This woman is part of the problem.
2:43

This woman is not a serious law enforcement professional. She’s more like a partisan Democrat wearing a badge. Instead of minding her own business, Renee Good interfered with ICE while they were lawfully doing their jobs. Law enforcement doesn’t just get to pick and choose which laws they like based on politics. When officers start playing activist instead of enforcing the law, they become part of the problem. This woman is part of the problem.

Jeffery Mead

32,274 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

OUTRAGED Minnesota doctor: This morning I learned that Renee Good still had a pulse 8 minutes after she was shot by an ICE agent. And yet the offer to administer aid from a physician on the scene was denied. I can't say how much that stirs the blood of everyone behind me here.
0:43

OUTRAGED Minnesota doctor: This morning I learned that Renee Good still had a pulse 8 minutes after she was shot by an ICE agent. And yet the offer to administer aid from a physician on the scene was denied. I can't say how much that stirs the blood of everyone behind me here.

Simon Ateba

19,307 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Our founders intentionally passed the Second Amendment right after the First, out of a recognition that every one of us has a right to defend ourselves and our loved ones, AND to serve as a check on a tyrannical government seeking to take away our God-given freedoms. The Democratic Party’s hatred of the Second Amendment and their increasing authoritarian instincts and actions pose a serious threat to our freedoms and is exactly why our rights ‘shall not be infringed.’
1:17

Our founders intentionally passed the Second Amendment right after the First, out of a recognition that every one of us has a right to defend ourselves and our loved ones, AND to serve as a check on a tyrannical government seeking to take away our God-given freedoms. The Democratic Party’s hatred of the Second Amendment and their increasing authoritarian instincts and actions pose a serious threat to our freedoms and is exactly why our rights ‘shall not be infringed.’

Tulsi Gabbard 🌺

940,573 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Thank you Libs of TikTok for helping to make the story about a California high school student whose First Amendment rights were trampled for posting a simple sign: “We ❤️ ICE.” FIRE attorneys stepped in, took the case, and won. 🔥
0:29

Thank you Libs of TikTok for helping to make the story about a California high school student whose First Amendment rights were trampled for posting a simple sign: “We ❤️ ICE.” FIRE attorneys stepped in, took the case, and won. 🔥

Amy Reichert

182,095 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten