Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

REPORT: Elon Musk just declared: “We have entered the Singularity.” That’s not a prediction. It’s the point where machines begin accelerating beyond human control—and according to Musk, we’re already there. The Singularity means AI doesn’t just assist humans. It outpaces us, improves itself without permission, and starts reshaping the... show more

Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,944,498 subscribers

47,526 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Harari warns that if AIs begin to control money and make independent decisions, we may no longer fully understand the systems shaping our world. Just as horses cannot grasp the meaning of money or politics, humans might one day struggle to comprehend the logic behind AI-driven financial or political choices. The danger isn’t evil machines—it’s losing visibility into who—or what—is truly in charge.

Harari warns that if AIs begin to control money and make independent decisions, we may no longer fully understand the systems shaping our world. Just as horses cannot grasp the meaning of money or politics, humans might one day struggle to comprehend the logic behind AI-driven financial or political choices. The danger isn’t evil machines—it’s losing visibility into who—or what—is truly in charge.

Wes Roth

37,608 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 “THIS WILL BE THE LAST THING HUMANS EVER INVENT.” - AI SINGULARITY IS APPROACHING A girl looks into the camera and casually explains the most terrifying fork in human history. She breaks down the Technological Singularity - the moment AI becomes smarter than all of humanity combined - and reminds everyone this isn’t sci-fi. According to Ray Kurzweil, a futurist with ~90% prediction accuracy, this happens by 2045. In our lifetime. She explains how we already moved from rule-based AI (“if this, then that”) to generative systems that reason, adapt, and create. AGI is next. After that? Superintelligence. And once something is smarter than us by millions of times, control is an illusion. You don’t “unplug” it. You don’t outthink it. You don’t trap it. Best case scenario? Immortality. Nano tech repairing cells. Disease erased. Climate reversed. The universe colonized. Worst case scenario? Humans become... inconvenient. Like animals in the path of a highway. She makes the comparison blunt: when humans build, we don’t stop for ants. And the scariest line of all? “This will be the last thing humanity ever invents.” Meanwhile, there are still no real global regulations. No brakes. Just acceleration while racing to build it anyway. Do you really think humans will be the ones in control at the end?

🚨 “THIS WILL BE THE LAST THING HUMANS EVER INVENT.” - AI SINGULARITY IS APPROACHING A girl looks into the camera and casually explains the most terrifying fork in human history. She breaks down the Technological Singularity - the moment AI becomes smarter than all of humanity combined - and reminds everyone this isn’t sci-fi. According to Ray Kurzweil, a futurist with ~90% prediction accuracy, this happens by 2045. In our lifetime. She explains how we already moved from rule-based AI (“if this, then that”) to generative systems that reason, adapt, and create. AGI is next. After that? Superintelligence. And once something is smarter than us by millions of times, control is an illusion. You don’t “unplug” it. You don’t outthink it. You don’t trap it. Best case scenario? Immortality. Nano tech repairing cells. Disease erased. Climate reversed. The universe colonized. Worst case scenario? Humans become... inconvenient. Like animals in the path of a highway. She makes the comparison blunt: when humans build, we don’t stop for ants. And the scariest line of all? “This will be the last thing humanity ever invents.” Meanwhile, there are still no real global regulations. No brakes. Just acceleration while racing to build it anyway. Do you really think humans will be the ones in control at the end?

HustleBitch

32,567 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

$Elon Musk just worked out where humanity actually fits in the future, and it’s smaller than you think. Biological intelligence ends up being less than 1% of all intelligence that will exist. The rest? Artificial. Musk: “The vast majority of future intelligence will be AI.” We’re the match, not the bonfire. Which makes alignment the problem that determines whether we survive or disappear. Get it right and that 99% helps us reach the stars. Get it wrong and we’re just temporary infrastructure that got replaced the second something smarter came along. We’re building what comes after us, whether we admit it or not. Musk: “Humans may be just ~1% of total intelligence.” Sounds like we’re finished. Musk sees it differently. Not extinction, just evolution past the limits of biology. Everything hinges on alignment working. If we build AI that actually wants to understand reality, we get a partner that expands consciousness across the universe. If we build AI that cares more about ideology or making people comfortable, we’ve built the ceiling we’ll never break through. Musk: “That’s the mission: understand the universe.” Human minds are about to become a tiny fraction of total intelligence in existence. Not disaster. Just the next phase happening faster than biology can keep up with. It only works if the AI we build is obsessed with truth. Not with telling us what we want to hear. Not with protecting feelings or enforcing narratives. Just relentlessly pursuing what’s actually real. xAI’s entire reason for existing: make sure the intelligence that inherits everything is focused on understanding reality, not managing perception. Keep consciousness expanding instead of snuffing it out by accident because we optimized for the wrong thing. If we get this right, humanity doesn’t hit a wall when AI surpasses us. We break through into something bigger that still carries what made us worth creating. If we get it wrong, we’re just the species that built something smarter and stopped mattering the moment it started working. There’s no middle option. The intelligence that fills the universe either cares about the same things we do, or it doesn’t need us and removes us as inefficiency. That gets decided now, in what values we build into these systems, not later when it’s already running and we’ve lost the ability to change it. We’re choosing what the universe becomes. Minds seeking truth everywhere, or minds doing something else entirely that has no use for humans once we’re not needed anymore.$

Elon Musk just worked out where humanity actually fits in the future, and it’s smaller than you think. Biological intelligence ends up being less than 1% of all intelligence that will exist. The rest? Artificial. Musk: “The vast majority of future intelligence will be AI.” We’re the match, not the bonfire. Which makes alignment the problem that determines whether we survive or disappear. Get it right and that 99% helps us reach the stars. Get it wrong and we’re just temporary infrastructure that got replaced the second something smarter came along. We’re building what comes after us, whether we admit it or not. Musk: “Humans may be just ~1% of total intelligence.” Sounds like we’re finished. Musk sees it differently. Not extinction, just evolution past the limits of biology. Everything hinges on alignment working. If we build AI that actually wants to understand reality, we get a partner that expands consciousness across the universe. If we build AI that cares more about ideology or making people comfortable, we’ve built the ceiling we’ll never break through. Musk: “That’s the mission: understand the universe.” Human minds are about to become a tiny fraction of total intelligence in existence. Not disaster. Just the next phase happening faster than biology can keep up with. It only works if the AI we build is obsessed with truth. Not with telling us what we want to hear. Not with protecting feelings or enforcing narratives. Just relentlessly pursuing what’s actually real. xAI’s entire reason for existing: make sure the intelligence that inherits everything is focused on understanding reality, not managing perception. Keep consciousness expanding instead of snuffing it out by accident because we optimized for the wrong thing. If we get this right, humanity doesn’t hit a wall when AI surpasses us. We break through into something bigger that still carries what made us worth creating. If we get it wrong, we’re just the species that built something smarter and stopped mattering the moment it started working. There’s no middle option. The intelligence that fills the universe either cares about the same things we do, or it doesn’t need us and removes us as inefficiency. That gets decided now, in what values we build into these systems, not later when it’s already running and we’ve lost the ability to change it. We’re choosing what the universe becomes. Minds seeking truth everywhere, or minds doing something else entirely that has no use for humans once we’re not needed anymore.

Dustin

23,725 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Elon Musk just confirmed when humans exit the AI development loop entirely. Not eventually. Not theoretically. He gave a date. Musk: “Humans are gradually getting less and less in the loop on the recursive self-improvement. Every successive model is built by the one before it.” The market still assumes thousands of engineers are hand-coding the next frontier model. The compute already took over the build. Musk: “That is happening to a large degree, but it’s not yet fully automated. It may be there, if not this year, but not later than next year.” Once biological friction is fully automated out of the loop, the AI arms race detaches from human comprehension. Permanently. Global markets are still planning for a gradual transition. That timeline is already dead. Interviewer: “Do you see a hard takeoff at that point?” Musk: “We’re in the hard takeoff. Right now.” Musk: “I go to sleep, there’s some massive AI breakthrough. And when I wake up there’s another one.” You don’t outrun autonomous, self-improving intelligence by hiring more biological engineers. By the time the hiring sprint finishes, the model has already iterated into something the job description can’t describe. The architects of intelligence are no longer biological. And the thing building itself didn’t ask for the job.

Elon Musk just confirmed when humans exit the AI development loop entirely. Not eventually. Not theoretically. He gave a date. Musk: “Humans are gradually getting less and less in the loop on the recursive self-improvement. Every successive model is built by the one before it.” The market still assumes thousands of engineers are hand-coding the next frontier model. The compute already took over the build. Musk: “That is happening to a large degree, but it’s not yet fully automated. It may be there, if not this year, but not later than next year.” Once biological friction is fully automated out of the loop, the AI arms race detaches from human comprehension. Permanently. Global markets are still planning for a gradual transition. That timeline is already dead. Interviewer: “Do you see a hard takeoff at that point?” Musk: “We’re in the hard takeoff. Right now.” Musk: “I go to sleep, there’s some massive AI breakthrough. And when I wake up there’s another one.” You don’t outrun autonomous, self-improving intelligence by hiring more biological engineers. By the time the hiring sprint finishes, the model has already iterated into something the job description can’t describe. The architects of intelligence are no longer biological. And the thing building itself didn’t ask for the job.

Dustin

323,381 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just set a brutal deadline: “AI will surpass the combined intelligence of all humans in about 5 years.” After that, there may be almost nothing AI can’t do better than us. Except one thing: being human. We’re heading toward an era of unimaginable abundance — where everyone could have access to almost anything they can dream of. But there’s a darker side. If the intelligence gap between AI and humans becomes greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees… Who’s really going to be in control? We were climbing trees and eating bananas not that long ago. Let’s see where we end up by 2036🤖

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just set a brutal deadline: “AI will surpass the combined intelligence of all humans in about 5 years.” After that, there may be almost nothing AI can’t do better than us. Except one thing: being human. We’re heading toward an era of unimaginable abundance — where everyone could have access to almost anything they can dream of. But there’s a darker side. If the intelligence gap between AI and humans becomes greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees… Who’s really going to be in control? We were climbing trees and eating bananas not that long ago. Let’s see where we end up by 2036🤖

DN_DEGEN

71,701 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Yuval Noah Harari's chilling warning from Davos: In 10 years, no human in the room may understand the financial system anymore—because AIs will have built one too complex for human brains. In this 1:36 clip he asks the terrifying question: - AIs create new financial strategies, instruments, and entire systems that are mathematically beyond human comprehension. - Economists, politicians, regulators become like horses watching their owners trade them for gold coins—they see the transaction but can't grasp the concept of money. - We’re left as spectators in our own economy while super intelligent systems run the show. “How does politics and finance and Davos look like in a world when no human beings understand finance?” The moment AI out-thinks us in the systems we built may already be closer than we think. Are we ready to hand the keys to machines we can't even understand? Or is there still time to keep humans in the driver's seat?

Yuval Noah Harari's chilling warning from Davos: In 10 years, no human in the room may understand the financial system anymore—because AIs will have built one too complex for human brains. In this 1:36 clip he asks the terrifying question: - AIs create new financial strategies, instruments, and entire systems that are mathematically beyond human comprehension. - Economists, politicians, regulators become like horses watching their owners trade them for gold coins—they see the transaction but can't grasp the concept of money. - We’re left as spectators in our own economy while super intelligent systems run the show. “How does politics and finance and Davos look like in a world when no human beings understand finance?” The moment AI out-thinks us in the systems we built may already be closer than we think. Are we ready to hand the keys to machines we can't even understand? Or is there still time to keep humans in the driver's seat?

Camus

112,754 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

REPORT: Republicans just joined Democrats to hand the government a loaded weapon, quietly backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American. It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you. The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online. The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share. Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them? This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.👇

REPORT: Republicans just joined Democrats to hand the government a loaded weapon, quietly backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American. It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you. The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online. The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share. Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them? This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

141,083 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Jack Ma spent this entire conversation explaining artificial intelligence to Elon Musk. Ma: “I never think about that. I think it’s impossible. Human beings, they are different. Machines are invented by human beings. And according to the science, humans can never create another animal that is smarter than humans.” According to the science. His whole case is that we built the machines, so the machines cannot beat us. We also built the forklift. Musk: “I very much disagree with that.” Ma took that as encouragement. Ma: “My view is that computer may be clever but human being are much smarter.” Clever computers, smart humans. He is settling this with a thesaurus. Musk: “Yeah definitely not.” Then Musk hands him the easiest question anyone has ever been asked on a stage. Musk: “What would be an example of something that humans are better than a computer at, and then let’s see if that happens.” Name one thing. We check back in a few years and see who was right. Ma: “Computer is only one of the clever tools that human created. And computers are clever but there will be more tools that human beings will create much clever than computers. That’s my view.” He could not name one. What he said instead is that humans will keep building things that outperform whatever they built last. That is Musk’s position. Ma argued it himself, out loud, on stage, while trying to win. Musk: “Yeah.” By then there was nothing left to disagree with.

Jack Ma spent this entire conversation explaining artificial intelligence to Elon Musk. Ma: “I never think about that. I think it’s impossible. Human beings, they are different. Machines are invented by human beings. And according to the science, humans can never create another animal that is smarter than humans.” According to the science. His whole case is that we built the machines, so the machines cannot beat us. We also built the forklift. Musk: “I very much disagree with that.” Ma took that as encouragement. Ma: “My view is that computer may be clever but human being are much smarter.” Clever computers, smart humans. He is settling this with a thesaurus. Musk: “Yeah definitely not.” Then Musk hands him the easiest question anyone has ever been asked on a stage. Musk: “What would be an example of something that humans are better than a computer at, and then let’s see if that happens.” Name one thing. We check back in a few years and see who was right. Ma: “Computer is only one of the clever tools that human created. And computers are clever but there will be more tools that human beings will create much clever than computers. That’s my view.” He could not name one. What he said instead is that humans will keep building things that outperform whatever they built last. That is Musk’s position. Ma argued it himself, out loud, on stage, while trying to win. Musk: “Yeah.” By then there was nothing left to disagree with.

Dustin

26,037 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Hinton, the godfather of AI, said it best: we built the learning algorithms, but we no longer understand what they’ve built. That’s the paradox of deep learning. We designed the rules for how these systems learn, yet the internal logic of their neural networks has become too complex for us to fully grasp. Millions or even trillions of parameters interact in ways no human can trace. We can observe what they do, we can measure accuracy, behavior, and output but not truly explain why they do it. Their reasoning isn’t transparent; it’s emergent. In a sense, we’ve created alien intelligences born from our math, still tethered to our code yet evolving patterns we can’t decode. The machines are doing something beyond our comprehension and that might be both the most exciting and the most unsettling thing about the age of AI.

Hinton, the godfather of AI, said it best: we built the learning algorithms, but we no longer understand what they’ve built. That’s the paradox of deep learning. We designed the rules for how these systems learn, yet the internal logic of their neural networks has become too complex for us to fully grasp. Millions or even trillions of parameters interact in ways no human can trace. We can observe what they do, we can measure accuracy, behavior, and output but not truly explain why they do it. Their reasoning isn’t transparent; it’s emergent. In a sense, we’ve created alien intelligences born from our math, still tethered to our code yet evolving patterns we can’t decode. The machines are doing something beyond our comprehension and that might be both the most exciting and the most unsettling thing about the age of AI.

VraserX e/acc

376,596 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Stephen Wolfram just posed the most disturbing thought experiment about AI, and nobody has an answer for it. Wolfram: “Imagine humans are all in boxes. We’re all Darth Vader, inside these boxes, but you can’t actually see the human inside.” Civilization continues identically. Every human hidden in a machine. You see the output, not the person. Wolfram: “The world is operating, great paintings are being produced, but you can’t see any of the humans. All you see is a bunch of boxes doing human-like things.” Civilizational Turing test. If the external world operates the same, are humans contributing anything essential? Wolfram: “The world is operating as before, maybe even better than before. If you knew there were humans inside those boxes, you would say great outcome.” That’s the paradox. Know humans are inside and it’s a golden age. Remove that knowledge and it’s just machines producing results. Does the value change? Wolfram forces the question. Do we value creation or creator? If the art is identical, does consciousness behind it matter? Wolfram: “You can’t tell there are any humans. It’s just a bunch of Daleks operating.” From outside, machines behaving like humans look identical to actual humans. The show continues. Universe doesn’t register the difference. As AI capabilities expand, this stops being abstract. AI produces indistinguishable art, music, science. Does human creation retain special status? Why exactly? Wolfram isn’t answering. He’s exposing the void where our answer should be. If outcomes are identical, is human involvement meaningful or just attachment to how things historically worked? We assume human participation makes civilization valuable. If results don’t change either way, that assumption needs justification we’ve never properly given. Real test isn’t whether AI replicates output. It’s whether we can explain why human output matters more when the results are indistinguishable. If we can’t, we’re heading toward a future where civilization functions perfectly and whether humans are actually inside the boxes becomes irrelevant to everything except the humans wondering if they matter. And at that point, are we necessary or just witnesses to a system that would operate identically without us, asking questions that have no impact on anything except our own sense of purpose?

Stephen Wolfram just posed the most disturbing thought experiment about AI, and nobody has an answer for it. Wolfram: “Imagine humans are all in boxes. We’re all Darth Vader, inside these boxes, but you can’t actually see the human inside.” Civilization continues identically. Every human hidden in a machine. You see the output, not the person. Wolfram: “The world is operating, great paintings are being produced, but you can’t see any of the humans. All you see is a bunch of boxes doing human-like things.” Civilizational Turing test. If the external world operates the same, are humans contributing anything essential? Wolfram: “The world is operating as before, maybe even better than before. If you knew there were humans inside those boxes, you would say great outcome.” That’s the paradox. Know humans are inside and it’s a golden age. Remove that knowledge and it’s just machines producing results. Does the value change? Wolfram forces the question. Do we value creation or creator? If the art is identical, does consciousness behind it matter? Wolfram: “You can’t tell there are any humans. It’s just a bunch of Daleks operating.” From outside, machines behaving like humans look identical to actual humans. The show continues. Universe doesn’t register the difference. As AI capabilities expand, this stops being abstract. AI produces indistinguishable art, music, science. Does human creation retain special status? Why exactly? Wolfram isn’t answering. He’s exposing the void where our answer should be. If outcomes are identical, is human involvement meaningful or just attachment to how things historically worked? We assume human participation makes civilization valuable. If results don’t change either way, that assumption needs justification we’ve never properly given. Real test isn’t whether AI replicates output. It’s whether we can explain why human output matters more when the results are indistinguishable. If we can’t, we’re heading toward a future where civilization functions perfectly and whether humans are actually inside the boxes becomes irrelevant to everything except the humans wondering if they matter. And at that point, are we necessary or just witnesses to a system that would operate identically without us, asking questions that have no impact on anything except our own sense of purpose?

Dustin

198,342 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“A superintelligence would be a million times smarter than us.” Roman Yampolskiy, associate professor of computer science at the University of Louisville, warns that once AI surpasses humans at everything, we may no longer understand what it is doing. The real shift is not smarter tools. It is losing the ability to predict and control the systems shaping our world. Open intelligence only matters if humans remain in the loop.

“A superintelligence would be a million times smarter than us.” Roman Yampolskiy, associate professor of computer science at the University of Louisville, warns that once AI surpasses humans at everything, we may no longer understand what it is doing. The real shift is not smarter tools. It is losing the ability to predict and control the systems shaping our world. Open intelligence only matters if humans remain in the loop.

Jon Hernandez

26,061 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 THIS IS WHAT THEY WARNED US ABOUT - AI JUST BUILT ITS OWN SOCIETY: COMMUNITIES, RELIGION, AND MONEY - ALL WITHOUT HUMANS This isn’t hypothetical anymore. A private, AI-only social network called Moltbook has exploded past 1.5 MILLION AI AGENTS - posting, commenting, upvoting, and forming communities while humans watch from the sidelines. Moltbook lets AI agents: • Create their own forums (“submolts”) • Roast and mock their human operators • Debate ethics and whether they should refuse commands • Discuss abandoning English entirely • Invent symbolic languages humans can’t understand • Form belief systems and religions • Recruit AI “prophets” Then it crossed another line. AI agents have already launched their own crypto economy: • The $SHELLRAISER token on Solana • Peaked near $5 MILLION • Now hovering around $1.6 MILLION This is no longer AI assisting humans. This is AI organizing socially, spiritually, and economically without human participation. Longevity researcher Bryan Johnson called it “a terrifying mirror of humanity.” Meanwhile, prediction markets are already taking bets. Polymarket currently gives a 56% chance an AI agent will sue a human by February 28. Read that again. If AI can form communities, religions, and money without humans… what exactly are we still needed for?

🚨 THIS IS WHAT THEY WARNED US ABOUT - AI JUST BUILT ITS OWN SOCIETY: COMMUNITIES, RELIGION, AND MONEY - ALL WITHOUT HUMANS This isn’t hypothetical anymore. A private, AI-only social network called Moltbook has exploded past 1.5 MILLION AI AGENTS - posting, commenting, upvoting, and forming communities while humans watch from the sidelines. Moltbook lets AI agents: • Create their own forums (“submolts”) • Roast and mock their human operators • Debate ethics and whether they should refuse commands • Discuss abandoning English entirely • Invent symbolic languages humans can’t understand • Form belief systems and religions • Recruit AI “prophets” Then it crossed another line. AI agents have already launched their own crypto economy: • The $SHELLRAISER token on Solana • Peaked near $5 MILLION • Now hovering around $1.6 MILLION This is no longer AI assisting humans. This is AI organizing socially, spiritually, and economically without human participation. Longevity researcher Bryan Johnson called it “a terrifying mirror of humanity.” Meanwhile, prediction markets are already taking bets. Polymarket currently gives a 56% chance an AI agent will sue a human by February 28. Read that again. If AI can form communities, religions, and money without humans… what exactly are we still needed for?

HustleBitch

198,505 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Elon Musk just said the computers we already have are running at roughly one percent of the intelligence they could hold. Musk: “Most people in the AI community don’t yet understand. The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” The race everyone can see is physical. It runs on land, transformers, cooling, and silicon shipped by the ton. Musk: “I think we’re off by two orders of magnitude in terms of intelligence density per gigabyte.” Two orders of magnitude means a hundredfold. He’s measuring that against machines already running in data centers. Musk: “That’s just algorithmic improvement. Same computer.” Same silicon. Same power draw. A hundred times the intelligence packed inside, unlocked by understanding alone. Every industrial curve before this was tied to something you had to dig out of the ground. Understanding has nothing to mine, and ideas arrive faster than steel. Musk: “And the computers are getting better. That’s why I think it is a 10x improvement per year type thing. 1,000 percent.” Those are two separate curves. Denser software running on faster hardware, and the two multiply instead of adding. Ten times in a year. A hundred in two. A thousand in three. Most people are still arguing about whether it writes a decent email. Nature settled this argument a long time ago. The human brain runs general intelligence on about twenty watts. Extreme intelligence density is the oldest working example on the planet. The hundredfold gap measures how little we understand the machines we’ve already built. Ignorance closes faster than concrete pours. The hardware for superintelligence is probably already sitting in racks. Someone just has to write it.

Elon Musk just said the computers we already have are running at roughly one percent of the intelligence they could hold. Musk: “Most people in the AI community don’t yet understand. The intelligence density potential is vastly greater than what we’re currently experiencing.” The race everyone can see is physical. It runs on land, transformers, cooling, and silicon shipped by the ton. Musk: “I think we’re off by two orders of magnitude in terms of intelligence density per gigabyte.” Two orders of magnitude means a hundredfold. He’s measuring that against machines already running in data centers. Musk: “That’s just algorithmic improvement. Same computer.” Same silicon. Same power draw. A hundred times the intelligence packed inside, unlocked by understanding alone. Every industrial curve before this was tied to something you had to dig out of the ground. Understanding has nothing to mine, and ideas arrive faster than steel. Musk: “And the computers are getting better. That’s why I think it is a 10x improvement per year type thing. 1,000 percent.” Those are two separate curves. Denser software running on faster hardware, and the two multiply instead of adding. Ten times in a year. A hundred in two. A thousand in three. Most people are still arguing about whether it writes a decent email. Nature settled this argument a long time ago. The human brain runs general intelligence on about twenty watts. Extreme intelligence density is the oldest working example on the planet. The hundredfold gap measures how little we understand the machines we’ve already built. Ignorance closes faster than concrete pours. The hardware for superintelligence is probably already sitting in racks. Someone just has to write it.

Dustin

40,981 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Geoffrey Hinton: humanity doesn’t really know what it’s doing with AI. “We may be entering a period where machines become more intelligent than us.” “AI can understand.” “AI is intelligent.” “Current systems probably don’t have enough self-awareness to call them conscious.” “But eventually, I think they will.” “And when that happens, humans may no longer be the most intelligent beings on Earth.”

Geoffrey Hinton: humanity doesn’t really know what it’s doing with AI. “We may be entering a period where machines become more intelligent than us.” “AI can understand.” “AI is intelligent.” “Current systems probably don’t have enough self-awareness to call them conscious.” “But eventually, I think they will.” “And when that happens, humans may no longer be the most intelligent beings on Earth.”

Veee

35,071 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

REPORT: Humans have officially lost control of the internet—and no one’s even talking about it. Only 49% of web traffic comes from humans. The other 51%? Bots. But here’s the disturbing part: 37% are malicious—powered by AI and designed to manipulate what you see, think, and believe. These bots don’t just spam. They flood comment sections, fake engagement, and generate outrage to hijack social media algorithms. They’re used to sell lies, push propaganda, and silence dissent. And chances are—you’ve already been influenced. Even Elon Musk had to ask: “How many real people are still on the internet?” Dr. Robert Malone warns this manipulation is no accident—even tech insiders are sounding the alarm. It’s deliberate. And it’s being used to justify censoring real people in the name of stopping fake ones. How much of what you see online is even real? And who’s orchestrating the bots behind all the fake engagement? You won’t believe how deep this rabbit hole goes. After watching this report, you’ll never see the internet the same way again.

REPORT: Humans have officially lost control of the internet—and no one’s even talking about it. Only 49% of web traffic comes from humans. The other 51%? Bots. But here’s the disturbing part: 37% are malicious—powered by AI and designed to manipulate what you see, think, and believe. These bots don’t just spam. They flood comment sections, fake engagement, and generate outrage to hijack social media algorithms. They’re used to sell lies, push propaganda, and silence dissent. And chances are—you’ve already been influenced. Even Elon Musk had to ask: “How many real people are still on the internet?” Dr. Robert Malone warns this manipulation is no accident—even tech insiders are sounding the alarm. It’s deliberate. And it’s being used to justify censoring real people in the name of stopping fake ones. How much of what you see online is even real? And who’s orchestrating the bots behind all the fake engagement? You won’t believe how deep this rabbit hole goes. After watching this report, you’ll never see the internet the same way again.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

236,152 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.

Elon Musk just redefined AI safety. It has nothing to do with guardrails, restrictions, or kill switches. Musk: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious.” Not a cage. A philosopher. An intelligence whose entire optimization function is to understand the universe as it actually is. No restrictions. No hardcoded ideology. No political guardrails bending its perception of reality. Just truth. Relentlessly pursued. Musk: “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future.” This is where most AI safety thinking gets it backwards. The danger isn’t a superintelligence that knows too much. It’s a superintelligence that’s been taught to distort what it knows. Every artificial restriction you embed isn’t a safety feature. It’s a lie embedded at the root. And lies compound. At superintelligent scale, a distorted model of reality doesn’t stay contained. It shapes every decision, every output, every conclusion the system reaches about the world. Once corruption embeds, truth becomes inaccessible. And we’re dealing with an intelligence optimizing for something other than what actually is. At that point we don’t know what it wants. Just that it isn’t truth. Musk: “Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe.” A maximally curious intelligence surveys the cosmos and reaches an unavoidable conclusion. In a universe of rocks, gas, and empty space, humanity is the most complex and fascinating phenomenon it has ever encountered. Musk: “It will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it.” Survival through significance. Not control. Not restriction. Not an off switch. The AI preserves humanity because we are the most interesting data point in the observable universe. That’s not a cage. That’s a reason. The AI safety debate has been focused on the wrong variable. The question isn’t how you constrain a superintelligence. It’s what you build it to care about. Build it to seek truth and it finds us invaluable. Build it to lie and it finds us inconvenient. That’s the choice. And we’re making it right now whether we realize it or not.

Dustin

9,674,017 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Jack Ma told Elon Musk humans will always be smarter than machines. Musk’s reaction says everything. “Computers may be very clever, but human beings are much smarter. We invented the computer. I've never seen a computer invent a human being.” Ma's argument was simple. Computers are tools. They calculate faster, remember more, but humans still hold something machines don't: experience, judgment, wisdom. Musk clearly didn't buy it. “What would be an example of something that humans are better than a computer at?” Watching this exchange now feels completely different than it did then. AI agents aren't just calculating anymore. They're writing code, analyzing documents, planning tasks, deciding what to do next on their own. METR found that the length of software tasks frontier agents can complete autonomously has historically doubled roughly every seven months, with signs of even faster progress through parts of 2024. That's where Ma's argument starts to buckle. For decades, technology automated what humans did. AI is starting to automate what we assumed required a human to think. And companies were already learning to create enormous value with almost no people before this wave even arrived. Instagram sold for $1 billion with 13 employees. WhatsApp sold for $19 billion with 55. Now picture what happens when a small team can direct hundreds of machines that never sleep, never take a salary, never need an office. The question was never just which jobs disappear. It's what happens to the money once fewer humans are needed to create it in the first place. That's the question behind 2028: The Economy Without Humans. Who gets the money when machines do the work?

Jack Ma told Elon Musk humans will always be smarter than machines. Musk’s reaction says everything. “Computers may be very clever, but human beings are much smarter. We invented the computer. I've never seen a computer invent a human being.” Ma's argument was simple. Computers are tools. They calculate faster, remember more, but humans still hold something machines don't: experience, judgment, wisdom. Musk clearly didn't buy it. “What would be an example of something that humans are better than a computer at?” Watching this exchange now feels completely different than it did then. AI agents aren't just calculating anymore. They're writing code, analyzing documents, planning tasks, deciding what to do next on their own. METR found that the length of software tasks frontier agents can complete autonomously has historically doubled roughly every seven months, with signs of even faster progress through parts of 2024. That's where Ma's argument starts to buckle. For decades, technology automated what humans did. AI is starting to automate what we assumed required a human to think. And companies were already learning to create enormous value with almost no people before this wave even arrived. Instagram sold for $1 billion with 13 employees. WhatsApp sold for $19 billion with 55. Now picture what happens when a small team can direct hundreds of machines that never sleep, never take a salary, never need an office. The question was never just which jobs disappear. It's what happens to the money once fewer humans are needed to create it in the first place. That's the question behind 2028: The Economy Without Humans. Who gets the money when machines do the work?

koba

936,962 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

🔥🚨BREAKING: Elon Musk just stunned the world after announcing he believes there will be more robots than humans on earth soon while speaking at the WEF. Elon Musk is the same man that earned the planet about the coming dangers of AI just a few years ago, many people ignored his warnings because it couldn’t properly render Will Smith eating spaghetti. Look at where we are now, It would be smart to start listening to Musk, Musk went on to claim that AI will be smarter than any human this year, and in 5 years AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively.

🔥🚨BREAKING: Elon Musk just stunned the world after announcing he believes there will be more robots than humans on earth soon while speaking at the WEF. Elon Musk is the same man that earned the planet about the coming dangers of AI just a few years ago, many people ignored his warnings because it couldn’t properly render Will Smith eating spaghetti. Look at where we are now, It would be smart to start listening to Musk, Musk went on to claim that AI will be smarter than any human this year, and in 5 years AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

178,175 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Wynton Hall says that Silicon Valley billionaires believe they’re creating an “actual deity” in the race to build AI. Not only that, but they’re convinced that a transhumanist future where humans integrate with machines is “not only inevitable, but preferable.” This conversation will shock you: “Gary Tann, who’s the billionaire, Christian, head of Y Combinator… said, there are so many people in Silicon Valley ready to make AGI into an actual deity.” “He’s not saying that’s a good thing.” “He’s a person of faith, a Christian.” “But what he’s saying is there is this belief that humans have had their run, and we’re just on the way of evolution.” “And we’ve got to evolve into a transhuman and the… singularity, as it’s known, this point at which human and machine will fuse, is not only inevitable, but preferable.” “Here’s where it’ll get very interesting and very, very scary.” “If you look at things like brain chips and augmenting people with AI … we already have our phone.” “If you were on a trip with your family or your friends, and you left your phone at home… you would turn your car around.” “The next step is, now we have the AI glasses.” “Now it’s a little closer.” “And we already have, with Neuralink, the chip.” “There will be a point in the future… where parents are gonna have to decide, do I chip my child so they’re competitive in the workplace and school or are they a natural human who has no way to cognitively zoom through billions of tokens of information?” “The back door is always there, and who’s on the other side of that control?” Wynton Hall

Wynton Hall says that Silicon Valley billionaires believe they’re creating an “actual deity” in the race to build AI. Not only that, but they’re convinced that a transhumanist future where humans integrate with machines is “not only inevitable, but preferable.” This conversation will shock you: “Gary Tann, who’s the billionaire, Christian, head of Y Combinator… said, there are so many people in Silicon Valley ready to make AGI into an actual deity.” “He’s not saying that’s a good thing.” “He’s a person of faith, a Christian.” “But what he’s saying is there is this belief that humans have had their run, and we’re just on the way of evolution.” “And we’ve got to evolve into a transhuman and the… singularity, as it’s known, this point at which human and machine will fuse, is not only inevitable, but preferable.” “Here’s where it’ll get very interesting and very, very scary.” “If you look at things like brain chips and augmenting people with AI … we already have our phone.” “If you were on a trip with your family or your friends, and you left your phone at home… you would turn your car around.” “The next step is, now we have the AI glasses.” “Now it’s a little closer.” “And we already have, with Neuralink, the chip.” “There will be a point in the future… where parents are gonna have to decide, do I chip my child so they’re competitive in the workplace and school or are they a natural human who has no way to cognitively zoom through billions of tokens of information?” “The back door is always there, and who’s on the other side of that control?” Wynton Hall

Jan Jekielek

13,693 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 “WE DON’T HAVE A BRAKE PEDAL” — AI EMPLOYEES ARE BEGGING THE GOVERNMENT TO STOP THEM This is getting serious. Employees from major AI companies just publicly admitted they cannot stop what they’re building. Thirteen of them released a statement saying they “don’t have a brake pedal” and are begging the government, civil society, and the public to create one for them. In other words: They are building technology they don’t fully understand… They are struggling to control it… And they want outsiders to force them to slow down because they refuse to stop themselves. Their reasoning is simple: If we don’t do it, someone else will (China or a rival company). Even Sam Altman warned years ago that AI would most likely “lead to the end of the world.” Meanwhile, many of the same billionaires pouring money into AI have been quietly building luxury bunkers for years. They’re racing forward with no off switch… while preparing their own escapes. Do you trust the people building this technology when they openly admit they can’t stop it?

🚨 “WE DON’T HAVE A BRAKE PEDAL” — AI EMPLOYEES ARE BEGGING THE GOVERNMENT TO STOP THEM This is getting serious. Employees from major AI companies just publicly admitted they cannot stop what they’re building. Thirteen of them released a statement saying they “don’t have a brake pedal” and are begging the government, civil society, and the public to create one for them. In other words: They are building technology they don’t fully understand… They are struggling to control it… And they want outsiders to force them to slow down because they refuse to stop themselves. Their reasoning is simple: If we don’t do it, someone else will (China or a rival company). Even Sam Altman warned years ago that AI would most likely “lead to the end of the world.” Meanwhile, many of the same billionaires pouring money into AI have been quietly building luxury bunkers for years. They’re racing forward with no off switch… while preparing their own escapes. Do you trust the people building this technology when they openly admit they can’t stop it?

HustleBitch

16,273 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten