正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

"Reservation is not a fundamental right. Reservation is not a constitutional right. Reservation is not even a right. Dr. Ambedkar on 30th Nov 1948, in the Constituent assembly had said-'Reservation is an exception, not a rule & should always be confined to minority of seats.'" Me on Timesnow with... show more

Dr. Neha Das

55,774 subscribers

40,919 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

As per our Constitution: "Reservation is to give representation to backward communities who were inadequately represented." Today, ppl who are no longer backward & are no longer inadequately representated, are still taking reservation. This is against Constitution itself. Plus "Right to equality" is the fundamental right. & Reservation is an exception. & Exception cannot become a rule. Even Dr. Ambedkar had said this.

As per our Constitution: "Reservation is to give representation to backward communities who were inadequately represented." Today, ppl who are no longer backward & are no longer inadequately representated, are still taking reservation. This is against Constitution itself. Plus "Right to equality" is the fundamental right. & Reservation is an exception. & Exception cannot become a rule. Even Dr. Ambedkar had said this.

Dr. Neha Das

19,721 次观看 • 1 个月前

Reservation, Reform & Rights Every section of society in the country has reservation; even the General Category has 10% reservation...: Rajkumar Rajan In the original Constitution, Article 15(4) was not even there...There was Article 334, which talks about reservation in seats in the House or the Legislative Assembly, wherein there is a 10-year period that has been extended by every government...: Karan Verma tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

Reservation, Reform & Rights Every section of society in the country has reservation; even the General Category has 10% reservation...: Rajkumar Rajan In the original Constitution, Article 15(4) was not even there...There was Article 334, which talks about reservation in seats in the House or the Legislative Assembly, wherein there is a 10-year period that has been extended by every government...: Karan Verma tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

36,203 次观看 • 6 天前

Union Minister Chirag Paswan: “Reservation is not something that can be ended simply because someone demands it. Nor is it charity given to anyone. Reservation is a constitutional right......."

Union Minister Chirag Paswan: “Reservation is not something that can be ended simply because someone demands it. Nor is it charity given to anyone. Reservation is a constitutional right......."

Megh Updates 🚨™

330,613 次观看 • 8 天前

Took Congressi , Namazwadi Spokie and Commie (A)Vivek to the cleaners on the Reservation Reforms Debate. Reservation is not a Constitutional Right! Get this loud and clear. Reforms are a Must, Govt needs to step up, however the opposition is not even an option. Watch and share!

Took Congressi , Namazwadi Spokie and Commie (A)Vivek to the cleaners on the Reservation Reforms Debate. Reservation is not a Constitutional Right! Get this loud and clear. Reforms are a Must, Govt needs to step up, however the opposition is not even an option. Watch and share!

Karan Verma

26,066 次观看 • 5 天前

Debate on reservation should begin with facts, not slogans. In India, reservation and affirmative provisions exist in different forms for different groups. The real debate is not simply "who gets reservation," but who is eligible under which constitutional or policy framework. Instead of reducing the conversation to one category, let's discuss reservation with honesty, constitutional understanding, and evidence-not misinformation or selective outrage. #Constitution #SocialJustice #Reservation #Equality #IndianConstitution

Debate on reservation should begin with facts, not slogans. In India, reservation and affirmative provisions exist in different forms for different groups. The real debate is not simply "who gets reservation," but who is eligible under which constitutional or policy framework. Instead of reducing the conversation to one category, let's discuss reservation with honesty, constitutional understanding, and evidence-not misinformation or selective outrage. #Constitution #SocialJustice #Reservation #Equality #IndianConstitution

Indians

11,154 次观看 • 1 个月前

Debate on reservation should begin with facts, not slogans. In India, reservation and affirmative provisions exist in different forms for different groups. The real debate is not simply "who gets reservation," but who is eligible under which constitutional or policy framework. Instead of reducing the conversation to one category, let's discuss reservation with honesty, constitutional understanding, and evidence-not misinformation or selective outrage. #Constitution #SocialJustice #Reservation #Equality #IndianConstitution

Debate on reservation should begin with facts, not slogans. In India, reservation and affirmative provisions exist in different forms for different groups. The real debate is not simply "who gets reservation," but who is eligible under which constitutional or policy framework. Instead of reducing the conversation to one category, let's discuss reservation with honesty, constitutional understanding, and evidence-not misinformation or selective outrage. #Constitution #SocialJustice #Reservation #Equality #IndianConstitution

Indians

12,826 次观看 • 1 个月前

-Manusmriti is not the basis of reservation -Lothian committee report (1932) said untouchability was based on profession & fast disappearing -Maximum caste discrimination cases are happening within reserved categories, then why penalize GC? Me on TimesNow with Pranesh Kumar Roy

-Manusmriti is not the basis of reservation -Lothian committee report (1932) said untouchability was based on profession & fast disappearing -Maximum caste discrimination cases are happening within reserved categories, then why penalize GC? Me on TimesNow with Pranesh Kumar Roy

Dr. Neha Das

44,661 次观看 • 2 天前

Let's be honest, it is not about reservation, -40 is not defensible in any situation. Even in the context of social justice. #amitkilhor #kilhor #reservation #socialjustice

Let's be honest, it is not about reservation, -40 is not defensible in any situation. Even in the context of social justice. #amitkilhor #kilhor #reservation #socialjustice

amit kilhor

60,549 次观看 • 4 个月前

All information in one video to prove that Reservation is not a fundamental right. -Specially Babasaheb's comments -If you are against Caste reservation, this video is for you. Please write #ReservationNotARight and share max. 🔁Repost max

All information in one video to prove that Reservation is not a fundamental right. -Specially Babasaheb's comments -If you are against Caste reservation, this video is for you. Please write #ReservationNotARight and share max. 🔁Repost max

Satyajeet Mishra

17,189 次观看 • 8 个月前

Reservation doesn’t affect talent; it simply opens up opportunities. Without talent, people cannot succeed: Dr.Manoj Yadav||डॉ. मनोज यादव|| Reservation is about inclusiveness. Inclusiveness is not possible without giving an opportunity to someone who has been deprived because of social conditions or other circumstances: Ashwani Kumar Mishra tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

Reservation doesn’t affect talent; it simply opens up opportunities. Without talent, people cannot succeed: Dr.Manoj Yadav||डॉ. मनोज यादव|| Reservation is about inclusiveness. Inclusiveness is not possible without giving an opportunity to someone who has been deprived because of social conditions or other circumstances: Ashwani Kumar Mishra tells Pranesh Kumar Roy

TIMES NOW

53,077 次观看 • 20 天前

Why Modi govt is not giving women’s reservations on 543 seats? Because it will upset their male leaders. Look at this data: Reservation on 543 — Women - 181, Men - 362 Reservation on 850 — Women - 283, Men - 567 This is men’s reservation not women. — Report by Ravish Kumar

Why Modi govt is not giving women’s reservations on 543 seats? Because it will upset their male leaders. Look at this data: Reservation on 543 — Women - 181, Men - 362 Reservation on 850 — Women - 283, Men - 567 This is men’s reservation not women. — Report by Ravish Kumar

Shantanu

257,787 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is a Trojan horse. Women’s reservation could be implemented tomorrow through a simple amendment. Instead, it is being tied to census and delimitation. The real game is not reservation for women, but political reservation for the BJP. #WomensReservation #Delimitation

This is a Trojan horse. Women’s reservation could be implemented tomorrow through a simple amendment. Instead, it is being tied to census and delimitation. The real game is not reservation for women, but political reservation for the BJP. #WomensReservation #Delimitation

Yogendra Yadav

98,304 次观看 • 4 个月前

VIDEO | Briefing the media over Karnataka CM DK Shivakumar's remarks on Muslim reservation, Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju (Kiren Rijiju) says, "In 1946, the Constituent Assembly had rejected Muslim League's proposal to provide reservation to Muslims. Under the leadership of Sardar Patel, everyone had then said that reservation cannot be provided on the basis of religion. Therefore, in the Constitution framed by Dr BR Ambedkar, it is clearly stated that reservation cannot be provided on the basis of religion. However, a Congress leader who holds a constitutional position says that Muslims would be given reservation and the Constitution would be amended. This is very serious and the Congress should clarify couple of things - first, the Congress leader must be sacked from the party, otherwise Congress should accept that it is walking on the path of the Muslim League." (Full video available on PTI Videos-

VIDEO | Briefing the media over Karnataka CM DK Shivakumar's remarks on Muslim reservation, Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju (Kiren Rijiju) says, "In 1946, the Constituent Assembly had rejected Muslim League's proposal to provide reservation to Muslims. Under the leadership of Sardar Patel, everyone had then said that reservation cannot be provided on the basis of religion. Therefore, in the Constitution framed by Dr BR Ambedkar, it is clearly stated that reservation cannot be provided on the basis of religion. However, a Congress leader who holds a constitutional position says that Muslims would be given reservation and the Constitution would be amended. This is very serious and the Congress should clarify couple of things - first, the Congress leader must be sacked from the party, otherwise Congress should accept that it is walking on the path of the Muslim League." (Full video available on PTI Videos-

Press Trust of India

24,362 次观看 • 1 年前

The 'Creamy Layer' Debate Reservation is not about the economic condition; it is about the social condition: ＠inc_ashwani Merit is a very suspect definition; it should not always be judged by marks: Political Analyst Manojit Mondal tells ＠RoyPranesh

The 'Creamy Layer' Debate Reservation is not about the economic condition; it is about the social condition: ＠inc_ashwani Merit is a very suspect definition; it should not always be judged by marks: Political Analyst Manojit Mondal tells ＠RoyPranesh

TIMES NOW

24,063 次观看 • 24 天前

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: Union Minister and RPI(A) Party President Ramdas Athawale says, "It is JP Nadda ji's view that there should be dialogue. We have also voiced our opposition because reservation is a constitutional right. Just as Babasaheb Ambedkar provided reservation for SCs and STs in the Constitution based on caste, and subsequently VP Singh decided to grant 27% reservation to OBCs by implementing the Mandal Commission recommendations, the Narendra Modi government has decided to provide 10% reservation to the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS). So, reservation exists for everyone; what is the point of opposing it? It is good that JP Nadda met them. He must have listened to what they had to say. However, my party's stance is that reservation for Dalits, Adivasis, and OBCs cannot be removed at all, nor can the EWS reservation be removed..."

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: Union Minister and RPI(A) Party President Ramdas Athawale says, "It is JP Nadda ji's view that there should be dialogue. We have also voiced our opposition because reservation is a constitutional right. Just as Babasaheb Ambedkar provided reservation for SCs and STs in the Constitution based on caste, and subsequently VP Singh decided to grant 27% reservation to OBCs by implementing the Mandal Commission recommendations, the Narendra Modi government has decided to provide 10% reservation to the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS). So, reservation exists for everyone; what is the point of opposing it? It is good that JP Nadda met them. He must have listened to what they had to say. However, my party's stance is that reservation for Dalits, Adivasis, and OBCs cannot be removed at all, nor can the EWS reservation be removed..."

ANI

65,334 次观看 • 3 天前

Union Minister JP Nadda Meets Anti-Quota Protesters - NDA ally says quota is a 'fundamental right' - Ramdas Athawale: We support reservation Even Union Minister Chirag Paswan, an important ally of the govt, has also said that no one can snatch away reservation from them: ＠MohitBhatt90 shares more details with Meenakshi Upreti

Union Minister JP Nadda Meets Anti-Quota Protesters - NDA ally says quota is a 'fundamental right' - Ramdas Athawale: We support reservation Even Union Minister Chirag Paswan, an important ally of the govt, has also said that no one can snatch away reservation from them: ＠MohitBhatt90 shares more details with Meenakshi Upreti

TIMES NOW

21,513 次观看 • 3 天前

A Brahmin boy understands why reservation is necessary, reservation is not a poverty alleviation program but a scheme to provide representation to socially backward people. Caste is privilege, Caste is cultural capital.

A Brahmin boy understands why reservation is necessary, reservation is not a poverty alleviation program but a scheme to provide representation to socially backward people. Caste is privilege, Caste is cultural capital.

The Dalit Voice

25,143 次观看 • 1 个月前

A DMK leader Stalin is celebrating the failure of the 33% reservation bill for women in loksabha, says the news. Giving 1,000rs is empowerment. But Giving 33% reservation is not. What a sick mindset. DMK must be eradicated.💀

A DMK leader Stalin is celebrating the failure of the 33% reservation bill for women in loksabha, says the news. Giving 1,000rs is empowerment. But Giving 33% reservation is not. What a sick mindset. DMK must be eradicated.💀

Sanghi Prince 🚩

15,555 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is not a time for APPEAL but to REFORM. Bring One Family One Reservation Bring One Time Reservation Bring Creamy layer

This is not a time for APPEAL but to REFORM. Bring One Family One Reservation Bring One Time Reservation Bring Creamy layer

Anuradha Tiwari

46,353 次观看 • 24 天前