Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Richard Feynman didn’t just revolutionize physics; he diagnosed the fundamental sickness of modern status-seeking. To Feynman, the Nobel Prize was a "pain in the neck." While the world fixates on the external validation of the Swedish Academy, he viewed the "honors" as fundamentally unreal—a distraction from the only metric... that actually matters in high-level pursuit. His philosophy provides a masterclass in intellectual autonomy: 1. The Kick of Discovery: The "prize" is the moment of insight, not the medal. If the work itself isn’t the reward, the accolade is a hollow substitute. 2. The Utility Filter: Real prestige isn't a title; it’s the observation that other brilliant people are actually using your work to build the future. 3. The Institutional Trap: He resigned from the National Academy of Science because it devolved into a "who's who" club. When an organization spends more time gatekeeping than innovating, it’s dead. We live in an era of "profile-first" achievement where the badge often precedes the breakthrough. Feynman reminds us that true "nobility" in work isn't decided by a committee—it’s found in the pleasure of finding the thing out. Validation is a lagging indicator. Focus on the kick. In a world obsessed with digital badges and titles, what is the one "kick of discovery" in your own work that no trophy could ever replace?show more

Camus

455,870 subscribers

27,987 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

On Founder’s Day, I find myself reflecting on the sheer audacity of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah’s vision. It’s one thing to read about it, but another to truly grasp that he was imagining a future for Ghana that even today feels ambitious. He dreamt of dams, highways, and industries at a time when many couldn’t see past the immediate horizon. It’s humbling to realize that the criticisms he faced were often from those who couldn’t comprehend the scale of his dream. Today, we live in that dream. We drive on his roads, draw power from his dam, and are educated in the institutions he established. His work wasn’t just construction; it was an act of faith in the future of Ghana, a faith that has been profoundly vindicated. His legacy is not just a chapter in a history book; it’s the foundation we stand on. The question for us now is: how do we build upon it? #FoundersDay

On Founder’s Day, I find myself reflecting on the sheer audacity of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah’s vision. It’s one thing to read about it, but another to truly grasp that he was imagining a future for Ghana that even today feels ambitious. He dreamt of dams, highways, and industries at a time when many couldn’t see past the immediate horizon. It’s humbling to realize that the criticisms he faced were often from those who couldn’t comprehend the scale of his dream. Today, we live in that dream. We drive on his roads, draw power from his dam, and are educated in the institutions he established. His work wasn’t just construction; it was an act of faith in the future of Ghana, a faith that has been profoundly vindicated. His legacy is not just a chapter in a history book; it’s the foundation we stand on. The question for us now is: how do we build upon it? #FoundersDay

Ken O. Agyapong

16,426 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Pedro Franceschi explains why Brex doesn’t hire “people managers” anymore One day Brex founder Pedro Franceschi made a list of all of the leaders at the company who worked and didn’t work. “I was trying to find what was predictive of leadership success,” he explains. “A lot of things are important, but they’re not predictive. For example, being customer obsessed is important, but there are people who were customer obsessed who were on both sides of the list.” The only trait that Pedro found to be predictive of leadership success at Brex was what he calls “the ability to operate at all levels” — someone who even at the highest levels of leadership has a deep understanding of the details of execution at the individual contributor level. What this means in practice is a CTO who is actually a great engineer. A Head of Design who can actually design amazing products. And a great Head of Sales who can actually go and close deals themselves if they need to. “It doesn’t mean that they’re going to do that all the time,” Pedro explains, “But it means that they know the nuances of what makes someone great at the craft… If you don’t know how to identify greatness because you don’t know what the bar is yourself, there’s no way to build a team that’s great.” He continues: “A lot of companies develop this role over time that people call a ‘people manager.’ They’re Director of Engineering but they can’t really code because they manage people now… And that concept is just something we eliminated. At the end of the day, there’s no way to manage people divorced from the work — you’re managing the work itself.” Pedro uses Jony Ive as an example: “Jony Ive wasn’t managing the team that designed the iPhone. He was designing the iPhone with a group of people. It’s simple, but it is a very profound change in how you orient your relationship with the work and what you put out there in the world. And I think you have to select for people who appreciate the actual output of the work and the work itself, not the process of doing the work… What matters is: Do you know what great looks like? Can you do it yourself? And can you bring people along with a really high bar for doing it at all level.” Video source: Kleiner Perkins (2025)

Pedro Franceschi explains why Brex doesn’t hire “people managers” anymore One day Brex founder Pedro Franceschi made a list of all of the leaders at the company who worked and didn’t work. “I was trying to find what was predictive of leadership success,” he explains. “A lot of things are important, but they’re not predictive. For example, being customer obsessed is important, but there are people who were customer obsessed who were on both sides of the list.” The only trait that Pedro found to be predictive of leadership success at Brex was what he calls “the ability to operate at all levels” — someone who even at the highest levels of leadership has a deep understanding of the details of execution at the individual contributor level. What this means in practice is a CTO who is actually a great engineer. A Head of Design who can actually design amazing products. And a great Head of Sales who can actually go and close deals themselves if they need to. “It doesn’t mean that they’re going to do that all the time,” Pedro explains, “But it means that they know the nuances of what makes someone great at the craft… If you don’t know how to identify greatness because you don’t know what the bar is yourself, there’s no way to build a team that’s great.” He continues: “A lot of companies develop this role over time that people call a ‘people manager.’ They’re Director of Engineering but they can’t really code because they manage people now… And that concept is just something we eliminated. At the end of the day, there’s no way to manage people divorced from the work — you’re managing the work itself.” Pedro uses Jony Ive as an example: “Jony Ive wasn’t managing the team that designed the iPhone. He was designing the iPhone with a group of people. It’s simple, but it is a very profound change in how you orient your relationship with the work and what you put out there in the world. And I think you have to select for people who appreciate the actual output of the work and the work itself, not the process of doing the work… What matters is: Do you know what great looks like? Can you do it yourself? And can you bring people along with a really high bar for doing it at all level.” Video source: Kleiner Perkins (2025)

Startup Archive

45,584 просмотров • 1 год назад

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

frances 🏒

294,736 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Marc Andreessen on Elon Musk: “I think probably the single biggest question in all of business right now is: why don't more CEOs operate the way that he does?” "The top-line thing is just this incredible devotion from the leader of the company to fully, deeply understand what the company does, and to be completely knowledgeable about every aspect of it." "To be in the trenches and talking directly to the people who do the work, deeply understanding the issues, and being the key, lead problem solver in the organization." "What Elon does is—he shows up every week at each of his companies, he identifies the biggest problem that the company's having that week, and he fixes it. He does that every week for 52 weeks in a row. And then each of his companies has solved the 52 biggest problems that year, in that year." "The side effect of it is—he attracts many of the best people in the world to work with him. Because if you work with Elon, the expectations are through the roof in terms of your level of performance." Source: Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Chris Williamson

Marc Andreessen on Elon Musk: “I think probably the single biggest question in all of business right now is: why don't more CEOs operate the way that he does?” "The top-line thing is just this incredible devotion from the leader of the company to fully, deeply understand what the company does, and to be completely knowledgeable about every aspect of it." "To be in the trenches and talking directly to the people who do the work, deeply understanding the issues, and being the key, lead problem solver in the organization." "What Elon does is—he shows up every week at each of his companies, he identifies the biggest problem that the company's having that week, and he fixes it. He does that every week for 52 weeks in a row. And then each of his companies has solved the 52 biggest problems that year, in that year." "The side effect of it is—he attracts many of the best people in the world to work with him. Because if you work with Elon, the expectations are through the roof in terms of your level of performance." Source: Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 on Chris Williamson

a16z

140,507 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Today we lower the curtain on a life that spent itself teaching Uganda how to see its own reflection on a stage. To call him a playwright is true but insufficient. Mukulu was an institution unto himself. Those of us in this trade know what it costs to build a body of work like that, the rehearsals that ran too late, the casts he pushed because he refused to let anyone perform beneath what he knew they had in them. The arguments about a line or a gesture that felt, in the moment, like they mattered more than anything in the world. His language during rehearsals sometimes sounded vulgar to the young cast built around us but Art has no sanity. It’s as it is and what it is. More so, Mwami Mukulu was famous, actually notorious for his conduct as Director but the cast understood him and appreciate him. For demanding of his actors the same relentless standard he demanded of himself. That sternness was never cruelty. It was reverence. He simply could not treat the stage as anything less than sacred, and he made sure everyone who stood on one with him understood that too. He was, by every account, a difficult man to satisfy and an impossible man to forget. That is, in the end, the whole job description of a master to me a GRANDMASTER. Alex Mukulu did not simply entertain a country, he gave it a mirror and he held that mirror steady for almost fifty years, through changing governments and changing audiences. Never once flinching from what it showed. That is the work of a grand master of this craft, and it is the work he leaves in our hands now. Rest well, my Idol my inspiration Mr Director Alex Mukulu. The stage is dark tonight because you are no longer on it but everywhere US your students, your casts and your audiences carry a piece of what you taught us. The lights are still on Boss🫡 #SleepwellGrandMaster

Today we lower the curtain on a life that spent itself teaching Uganda how to see its own reflection on a stage. To call him a playwright is true but insufficient. Mukulu was an institution unto himself. Those of us in this trade know what it costs to build a body of work like that, the rehearsals that ran too late, the casts he pushed because he refused to let anyone perform beneath what he knew they had in them. The arguments about a line or a gesture that felt, in the moment, like they mattered more than anything in the world. His language during rehearsals sometimes sounded vulgar to the young cast built around us but Art has no sanity. It’s as it is and what it is. More so, Mwami Mukulu was famous, actually notorious for his conduct as Director but the cast understood him and appreciate him. For demanding of his actors the same relentless standard he demanded of himself. That sternness was never cruelty. It was reverence. He simply could not treat the stage as anything less than sacred, and he made sure everyone who stood on one with him understood that too. He was, by every account, a difficult man to satisfy and an impossible man to forget. That is, in the end, the whole job description of a master to me a GRANDMASTER. Alex Mukulu did not simply entertain a country, he gave it a mirror and he held that mirror steady for almost fifty years, through changing governments and changing audiences. Never once flinching from what it showed. That is the work of a grand master of this craft, and it is the work he leaves in our hands now. Rest well, my Idol my inspiration Mr Director Alex Mukulu. The stage is dark tonight because you are no longer on it but everywhere US your students, your casts and your audiences carry a piece of what you taught us. The lights are still on Boss🫡 #SleepwellGrandMaster

#JohnSegawaArts🇺🇬

12,652 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Richard Feynman spent much of his life chasing questions that didn’t seem especially practical. Things like: Why do people dream? What happens to consciousness under psychedelics? What can curiosity lead you to, if you follow it far enough? This episode of Freakonomics Radio explores the stranger and more personal side of the Nobel Prize-winning physicist’s life — not just his work as a scientist, but the restless curiosity that seemed to drive almost everything he did. It’s the final chapter in our three-part Richard Feynman series. Listen now wherever you get your podcasts.

Richard Feynman spent much of his life chasing questions that didn’t seem especially practical. Things like: Why do people dream? What happens to consciousness under psychedelics? What can curiosity lead you to, if you follow it far enough? This episode of Freakonomics Radio explores the stranger and more personal side of the Nobel Prize-winning physicist’s life — not just his work as a scientist, but the restless curiosity that seemed to drive almost everything he did. It’s the final chapter in our three-part Richard Feynman series. Listen now wherever you get your podcasts.

Freakonomics

10,693 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The beauty of Ragnar’s character is the constant war between his curiosity and his crown. He wasn’t just a raider; he was a father and a farmer who saw the humanity in his enemies. By covering that boy, he chose a quiet act of mercy that defied the beast his people expected him to be. He understood that a true legacy isn't built solely on the bodies of the fallen, but on the survival of the future. It takes a different kind of strength to hold onto your soul while building an empire.

The beauty of Ragnar’s character is the constant war between his curiosity and his crown. He wasn’t just a raider; he was a father and a farmer who saw the humanity in his enemies. By covering that boy, he chose a quiet act of mercy that defied the beast his people expected him to be. He understood that a true legacy isn't built solely on the bodies of the fallen, but on the survival of the future. It takes a different kind of strength to hold onto your soul while building an empire.

SAMWISE

43,201 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Richard Feynman was asked in the 1980s whether machines will ever think. He answered in front of a small room, on camera, decades before anyone shipped a chatbot. Feynman won the 1965 Nobel Prize in physics. He also helped design the first parallel computers at Thinking Machines, so this isn't a physicist guessing about software. Every AI argument running in 2026 is a rerun of the question he takes apart here. He refuses the framing most people still use and rebuilds it from the machine up. Watch the section where he compares what machines do to what animals do. He doesn't answer yes or no. He shows why the question is shaped wrong, in plain sentences, no math. An AI researcher I know played it for his team before a roadmap meeting and killed 2 features by lunch. The footage sits free on YouTube, blurry, unedited. We built the machines. We still argue with a dead man's framing.

Richard Feynman was asked in the 1980s whether machines will ever think. He answered in front of a small room, on camera, decades before anyone shipped a chatbot. Feynman won the 1965 Nobel Prize in physics. He also helped design the first parallel computers at Thinking Machines, so this isn't a physicist guessing about software. Every AI argument running in 2026 is a rerun of the question he takes apart here. He refuses the framing most people still use and rebuilds it from the machine up. Watch the section where he compares what machines do to what animals do. He doesn't answer yes or no. He shows why the question is shaped wrong, in plain sentences, no math. An AI researcher I know played it for his team before a roadmap meeting and killed 2 features by lunch. The footage sits free on YouTube, blurry, unedited. We built the machines. We still argue with a dead man's framing.

Moysei

22,687 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

SubhanAllah... The world of the unseen is closer than we think. 🕋 We often enter the Masjid thinking we are alone, but Allah (SWT) reminds us in the Qur’an that He created the Jinn to worship Him just like us. This footage captures a moment that reminds us of the greatness of our Creator. Whether it’s a shadow or a visitor from the unseen, it’s a powerful reminder that the Masajid are always filled with those who love Allah. #FridayMotivation

SubhanAllah... The world of the unseen is closer than we think. 🕋 We often enter the Masjid thinking we are alone, but Allah (SWT) reminds us in the Qur’an that He created the Jinn to worship Him just like us. This footage captures a moment that reminds us of the greatness of our Creator. Whether it’s a shadow or a visitor from the unseen, it’s a powerful reminder that the Masajid are always filled with those who love Allah. #FridayMotivation

It's Ahmad

259,108 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

.Ben Shapiro plays the viral clip where Tucker gets caught in a lie, but then he points out that these “little” lies aren’t the worst of it. Even worse is the demoralization op of the left and the “Horseshoe Right”- an effort to convince us that our country is rotten to the core. “The bigger lie is the lie that he is propagating – it’s a lie that the left is also propagating. It’s a lie that America is a terrible place that’s filled with nefarious forces beyond your control that are actually in control of your life and wrecking America.”

.Ben Shapiro plays the viral clip where Tucker gets caught in a lie, but then he points out that these “little” lies aren’t the worst of it. Even worse is the demoralization op of the left and the “Horseshoe Right”- an effort to convince us that our country is rotten to the core. “The bigger lie is the lie that he is propagating – it’s a lie that the left is also propagating. It’s a lie that America is a terrible place that’s filled with nefarious forces beyond your control that are actually in control of your life and wrecking America.”

Jackie Chea ⚖️| Agent #13/92

77,355 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Jeffrey Sachs names the driver of the wars: Washington and Europe still believe they run the world. That hegemonic mindset is at work in Ukraine, Gaza, Iran, and Venezuela—and it is now dragging the West into decline. “The reason we’re in these wars is basically because the United States and Europe are determined to maintain their hegemonic prerogatives. For centuries, the West—so-called, mainly the empires of Europe and from the late 19th century the United States—judged that they effectively ran the world. Mr. Bessent, our Treasury Secretary, who is a sheer vulgarian, the worst imaginable that we’ve ever had, basically says in the Financial Times today, ‘We run the world. We determine who does what. We determine who trades. We will destroy whichever countries we want.’ That’s the mindset. That mindset is at work in Ukraine. It’s at work in the genocide in Gaza. It’s at work in the war against Iran. It was at work, of course, in the kidnapping and confiscation of Venezuela’s oil revenues earlier this year. The mindset is we run the world. Yes, it’s a little bit nasty because there are these pesky wannabe challengers like Russia, Iran, or China that don’t want us to run the world, but effectively we run the world, and we’re going to tell the world what to do. That’s the mindset. It’s so out of date, so absurd, so delusional that it drives a set of policies—not only the war, but trade measures, protectionism, and so forth—that are leading the West into not only relative decline as these other places rise, but perhaps serious absolute decline at some point, because all of the claims that are made for hegemony and all of the overreach are leading to a buildup of burdens fiscally, in terms of debt, in terms of claims on trade, in terms of cutting off economic linkages around the world, including now the trade war between the United States and Canada, for God’s sake, which was launched just two days ago, that I think will put both Europe and the United States into very serious economic crisis in the coming years. Again, Europe is in a crisis right now. The United States is in what I would regard as a massive financial bubble due to the AI valuations and the stock market, which keep things afloat for the moment. But it’s a bubble that I think is going to burst.” Hegemony is not strength. It is overreach. The wars, the sanctions, and the bubble are the same system eating itself.

Jeffrey Sachs names the driver of the wars: Washington and Europe still believe they run the world. That hegemonic mindset is at work in Ukraine, Gaza, Iran, and Venezuela—and it is now dragging the West into decline. “The reason we’re in these wars is basically because the United States and Europe are determined to maintain their hegemonic prerogatives. For centuries, the West—so-called, mainly the empires of Europe and from the late 19th century the United States—judged that they effectively ran the world. Mr. Bessent, our Treasury Secretary, who is a sheer vulgarian, the worst imaginable that we’ve ever had, basically says in the Financial Times today, ‘We run the world. We determine who does what. We determine who trades. We will destroy whichever countries we want.’ That’s the mindset. That mindset is at work in Ukraine. It’s at work in the genocide in Gaza. It’s at work in the war against Iran. It was at work, of course, in the kidnapping and confiscation of Venezuela’s oil revenues earlier this year. The mindset is we run the world. Yes, it’s a little bit nasty because there are these pesky wannabe challengers like Russia, Iran, or China that don’t want us to run the world, but effectively we run the world, and we’re going to tell the world what to do. That’s the mindset. It’s so out of date, so absurd, so delusional that it drives a set of policies—not only the war, but trade measures, protectionism, and so forth—that are leading the West into not only relative decline as these other places rise, but perhaps serious absolute decline at some point, because all of the claims that are made for hegemony and all of the overreach are leading to a buildup of burdens fiscally, in terms of debt, in terms of claims on trade, in terms of cutting off economic linkages around the world, including now the trade war between the United States and Canada, for God’s sake, which was launched just two days ago, that I think will put both Europe and the United States into very serious economic crisis in the coming years. Again, Europe is in a crisis right now. The United States is in what I would regard as a massive financial bubble due to the AI valuations and the stock market, which keep things afloat for the moment. But it’s a bubble that I think is going to burst.” Hegemony is not strength. It is overreach. The wars, the sanctions, and the bubble are the same system eating itself.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

123,037 просмотров • 5 дней назад

It’s one of my favorite days of the year… Happy #InternationalWomensDay! #IWD23 is a day to reflect on the work of women throughout history and the work that continues today. It’s also a day to celebrate the women in your own life—like your mom, your sister, or your friends.

It’s one of my favorite days of the year… Happy #InternationalWomensDay! #IWD23 is a day to reflect on the work of women throughout history and the work that continues today. It’s also a day to celebrate the women in your own life—like your mom, your sister, or your friends.

Anita Zaidi

672,258 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🚨New: Sir Alex Ferguson on the Messi, Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo GOAT debate: • Interviewer: Sir Alex, the debate never ends — Messi, Pelé, Maradona, Ronaldo. Who is the greatest of all time for you? 🗣️Ferguson: “I’ve been asked this question more times than I can count over the years, and for a long time I refused to give a straight answer because the debate was still open. It isn’t open anymore. Messi’s World Cup in 2022 was the final piece. Before that tournament he already had everything else, the Champions Leagues, the league titles in different countries, the Ballons d’Or, the individual brilliance that no one could match. The only thing missing was the World Cup. He went and got it. When a player completes the full set like that, the conversation changes. He has now completed football. Every major trophy, every individual award, every level of the game. That closes the debate for me. Because of that completion, Messi sits clearly above Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo. I’m not saying the other three weren’t great. Of course they were. But the ledger is now complete for Messi in a way it never was for the others, and that has to count. Now, people will jump on the fact that Cristiano was my player. He was. He is still my boy in many ways. I have huge affection and respect for him, the hunger, the work rate, the way he rebuilt himself season after season. That part is emotional for me. But the ranking itself is no longer emotional. It’s factual. You separate the personal from the professional when the evidence is this clear. Let’s be honest about what Cristiano is. He is the more adaptable, all-round player. Different leagues, different systems, different styles of play. He could score with either foot, with his head, from distance, from six yards. He could lead a dressing room, he could carry a team on pure willpower, and he stayed at the highest level for an absurd length of time. No serious person denies any of that. Physical dominance, leadership, versatility — he has those qualities in abundance. But adaptable is not the same as greatest. In pure footballing terms — the genius of the first touch, the vision, the consistency at the absolute peak for over a decade, and now the complete trophy case — Messi is on another level. Ronaldo is not close in that specific sense. One is an extraordinary athlete and competitor who maximised every ounce of his talent. The other is simply a better footballer. That’s the distinction. Pele and Maradona were gods of their eras, no question. But the modern game is harder, deeper, and more athletic. The athletic demands, the tactical organisation, the quality of opposition week after week, it’s a different beast. Messi dominated a far stronger era for longer than either of them managed. That has to be recognised. I’m not sentimental about this. Sentiment is for fans and for the media. When you strip it back to what actually happened on the pitch and in the trophy cabinet, the answer is clear. Cristiano is an extraordinary athlete and competitor. Messi is just a better footballer. You can love Ronaldo more. You can respect him more. You can prefer his story, his personality, his work ethic. All of that is fair. What you cannot do is put him above Messi anymore. The ledger is closed.” Cristiano is an all-time great. Messi is the greatest. That’s just how it is now.”

🚨New: Sir Alex Ferguson on the Messi, Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo GOAT debate: • Interviewer: Sir Alex, the debate never ends — Messi, Pelé, Maradona, Ronaldo. Who is the greatest of all time for you? 🗣️Ferguson: “I’ve been asked this question more times than I can count over the years, and for a long time I refused to give a straight answer because the debate was still open. It isn’t open anymore. Messi’s World Cup in 2022 was the final piece. Before that tournament he already had everything else, the Champions Leagues, the league titles in different countries, the Ballons d’Or, the individual brilliance that no one could match. The only thing missing was the World Cup. He went and got it. When a player completes the full set like that, the conversation changes. He has now completed football. Every major trophy, every individual award, every level of the game. That closes the debate for me. Because of that completion, Messi sits clearly above Pele, Maradona and Ronaldo. I’m not saying the other three weren’t great. Of course they were. But the ledger is now complete for Messi in a way it never was for the others, and that has to count. Now, people will jump on the fact that Cristiano was my player. He was. He is still my boy in many ways. I have huge affection and respect for him, the hunger, the work rate, the way he rebuilt himself season after season. That part is emotional for me. But the ranking itself is no longer emotional. It’s factual. You separate the personal from the professional when the evidence is this clear. Let’s be honest about what Cristiano is. He is the more adaptable, all-round player. Different leagues, different systems, different styles of play. He could score with either foot, with his head, from distance, from six yards. He could lead a dressing room, he could carry a team on pure willpower, and he stayed at the highest level for an absurd length of time. No serious person denies any of that. Physical dominance, leadership, versatility — he has those qualities in abundance. But adaptable is not the same as greatest. In pure footballing terms — the genius of the first touch, the vision, the consistency at the absolute peak for over a decade, and now the complete trophy case — Messi is on another level. Ronaldo is not close in that specific sense. One is an extraordinary athlete and competitor who maximised every ounce of his talent. The other is simply a better footballer. That’s the distinction. Pele and Maradona were gods of their eras, no question. But the modern game is harder, deeper, and more athletic. The athletic demands, the tactical organisation, the quality of opposition week after week, it’s a different beast. Messi dominated a far stronger era for longer than either of them managed. That has to be recognised. I’m not sentimental about this. Sentiment is for fans and for the media. When you strip it back to what actually happened on the pitch and in the trophy cabinet, the answer is clear. Cristiano is an extraordinary athlete and competitor. Messi is just a better footballer. You can love Ronaldo more. You can respect him more. You can prefer his story, his personality, his work ethic. All of that is fair. What you cannot do is put him above Messi anymore. The ledger is closed.” Cristiano is an all-time great. Messi is the greatest. That’s just how it is now.”

Vfynn_🥷🏼 𐙚

33,848 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The brilliant Dr Aseem Malhotra startled a somewhat skeptical Dutch reporter with the analysis that millions of people are dead or injured from the shot and confessed that he is one of them!! ‘We have a pandemic of the vaccine injured. It is a massive public health crisis and in my view is the main likely driver of the excess deaths going on around the world.’ He implores scientists to come together to work on solutions. 🙌❤️‍🩹🙌

The brilliant Dr Aseem Malhotra startled a somewhat skeptical Dutch reporter with the analysis that millions of people are dead or injured from the shot and confessed that he is one of them!! ‘We have a pandemic of the vaccine injured. It is a massive public health crisis and in my view is the main likely driver of the excess deaths going on around the world.’ He implores scientists to come together to work on solutions. 🙌❤️‍🩹🙌

Kat A 🌸

443,670 просмотров • 2 лет назад

We are back in the terrain of whose mandate, between the National Commissioner and the Minister of police is to do what? Bahlali, the Minister is in trouble. Mchunu is asked who would have determined and decided that work of a Task Team is done and it can now be disbanded. He answers that it would have been the Minister, “possibly” using his powers in Section 207 (2). Except he misdirects himself. The powers in that section, as he describes, are those of National Commissioner. NOT the Minister!

We are back in the terrain of whose mandate, between the National Commissioner and the Minister of police is to do what? Bahlali, the Minister is in trouble. Mchunu is asked who would have determined and decided that work of a Task Team is done and it can now be disbanded. He answers that it would have been the Minister, “possibly” using his powers in Section 207 (2). Except he misdirects himself. The powers in that section, as he describes, are those of National Commissioner. NOT the Minister!

Sabelo Chalufu | @BetterGovZA 🇿🇦

80,223 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Richard Feynman had a habit of pulling complicated things apart until he could see what was actually true. That instinct took him from the Manhattan Project to the Challenger investigation, where he exposed NASA’s failure to properly assess the risks involved. But what made Feynman fascinating wasn’t just the physics. It was the way he approached everything: with skepticism, curiosity, irreverence, and a deep need to understand how things worked beneath the surface. In this series, Freakonomics Radio revisits the life and ideas of the Nobel Prize-winning physicist through archival tape, conversations with family and colleagues, and stories that feel surprisingly relevant right now. Link to full episodes in the comments.

Richard Feynman had a habit of pulling complicated things apart until he could see what was actually true. That instinct took him from the Manhattan Project to the Challenger investigation, where he exposed NASA’s failure to properly assess the risks involved. But what made Feynman fascinating wasn’t just the physics. It was the way he approached everything: with skepticism, curiosity, irreverence, and a deep need to understand how things worked beneath the surface. In this series, Freakonomics Radio revisits the life and ideas of the Nobel Prize-winning physicist through archival tape, conversations with family and colleagues, and stories that feel surprisingly relevant right now. Link to full episodes in the comments.

Freakonomics

20,957 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

REPORTER: "Did you offer to President Trump your Nobel Peace Prize?" MARÍA CORINA MACHADO: "I presented the President of the United States the medal...the Nobel Peace Prize." "Two hundred years ago, General Lafayette gave Simón Bolívar a medal with George Washington's face on it...[he] kept that medal for the rest of his life." "Two hundred years in history, the people of Bolívar are giving back to the heir of Washington a medal, in this case the medal of the Nobel Peace Prize, as a recognition for his unique commitment with our freedom."

REPORTER: "Did you offer to President Trump your Nobel Peace Prize?" MARÍA CORINA MACHADO: "I presented the President of the United States the medal...the Nobel Peace Prize." "Two hundred years ago, General Lafayette gave Simón Bolívar a medal with George Washington's face on it...[he] kept that medal for the rest of his life." "Two hundred years in history, the people of Bolívar are giving back to the heir of Washington a medal, in this case the medal of the Nobel Peace Prize, as a recognition for his unique commitment with our freedom."

Fox News

1,929,870 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Many people don’t realize all the behind-the-scenes work that jungkook does in the studio but he is the vocal backbone of bts for a reason, an example of that is ‘wishing on a star’ where his voice is present throughout the entire song in the form of harmonies and backing vocals

Many people don’t realize all the behind-the-scenes work that jungkook does in the studio but he is the vocal backbone of bts for a reason, an example of that is ‘wishing on a star’ where his voice is present throughout the entire song in the form of harmonies and backing vocals

mirakoo

52,887 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Bruce on Trump: "We know he is our lead. We know he is the guiding hand. We know that he is one of a few who knows all the details ... his leadership and his reelection to a second term was because people here in the US were tired of the status quo, and what the world has seen is a peacemaker."

Bruce on Trump: "We know he is our lead. We know he is the guiding hand. We know that he is one of a few who knows all the details ... his leadership and his reelection to a second term was because people here in the US were tired of the status quo, and what the world has seen is a peacemaker."

Aaron Rupar

280,924 просмотров • 1 год назад