正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Rocket 1.0 is live. This is our first major step toward Vibe Solutioning. Vibe coding solved how to build. It never solved what to build, or why. That's the harder problem and the one where most products actually fail. Rocket connects the thinking and the building in one platform....

949,591 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

49 条评论

Vadim 的头像
Vadim6 个月前

@rocketdotnew rip to all of the people who started vibe coding without being validated first lol

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew That's not a joke, that's a lesson most people are still paying tuition on.

Ori Mannheim 的头像
Ori Mannheim6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Vibe coding -> Vibe Solutioning 🔥 LFG

AshutoshShrivastava 的头像
AshutoshShrivastava6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Wild stat: 60–70% of people vibe coding don’t know what they’re building. So what exactly are they doing, just vibing?

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Vibing without validating. That's literally why we built Solve before Build.

Anuj 的头像
Anuj6 个月前

This genuinely made me pause. Every AI tool I’ve used lately is obsessed with building faster… but not once did I question if I’m building the right thing in the first place. The way this frames “thinking before coding” just clicks. Feels like this could save weeks (if not months) of going in the wrong direction. Curious to see how this plays out in real workflows 👀

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew That's exactly the problem we built for. The fastest build in the world pointed at the wrong problem is just expensive waste moving at speed. Rocket 1.0 puts the thinking before the building and keeps them connected so they never drift apart.

Brian Johnson 的头像
Brian Johnson6 个月前

@rocketdotnew this is the real insight. everyone's talking about "how do I build faster" but the graveyard is full of fast-built things nobody wanted

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew The graveyard doesn't have a shortage of code. It has a shortage of thinking before the code.

Chubby♨️ 的头像
Chubby♨️6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Really cool!

Karan 的头像
Karan6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Every AI tool in 2026 is competing on build speed. This is competing on decision quality. That's a fundamentally different bet

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Speed without direction is just expensive chaos. We believe in both. Fast and right. That only happens when the thinking and the building share the same context.

Priyanka Shah 的头像
Priyanka Shah6 个月前

@rocketdotnew In a world where companies are marketing their ARR numbers, we're busy making real products for real businesses 🦾

🅿️ 的头像
🅿️6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Finally something that asks if we should build instead of if we can build.

aditya 的头像
aditya6 个月前

@rocketdotnew 1.5M users before the 1.0 launch... imagine what happens when the rest of the builder community catches on to this

Rajesh Agarwal 的头像
Rajesh Agarwal6 个月前

@rocketdotnew I've seen a lot of AI launches this year. This is the first one that made me rethink my own workflow.

Mayank Tayal 的头像
Mayank Tayal6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Every AI tool in 2026 is competing on build speed. This is competing on decision quality. That's a fundamentally different bet.

Allen Lattimer 的头像
Allen Lattimer6 个月前

@rocketdotnew From idea → clarity → execution in one place. That’s the dream.

Atul Kumar 的头像
Atul Kumar6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Curious how this compares for solo builders vs. teams. Is the strategy layer more useful when you have multiple stakeholders debating direction?

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Both. A solo builder without Solve is guessing alone. A team without Solve is debating opinions instead of evidence. The strategy layer gives a solo founder the same decision quality a 10-person team argues toward in a week.

Mikael 的头像
Mikael6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Craftsman not a laborer

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew I loved this.

shirish 的头像
shirish6 个月前

@rocketdotnew vibe coding is complete now

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew just beginning.

Chase Dimond | Email Marketing Nerd 📧 的头像
Chase Dimond | Email Marketing Nerd 📧6 个月前

@rocketdotnew The storytelling in this video is what most AI companies get wrong. It starts with the problem, not the product. That's why it lands.

Aryan Rakib 的头像
Aryan Rakib6 个月前

@rocketdotnew This is the kind of launch that looks obvious in hindsight. A year from now people will wonder why nobody built this sooner.

Umesh 的头像
Umesh6 个月前

@rocketdotnew POV: You spent $420 on Lovable...then found a new tool that does it better.

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Synthesized migration strategy leveraging existing infrastructure and support. Bring your Supabase DB with you. It works on Rocket. DM @kalpesh and he'll sort out your migration credit.

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew @kalpesh @KalpeshZ92

FELIX 的头像
FELIX6 个月前

@rocketdotnew The speed of going from a prompt to a live app with Rocket is absolutely insane.

kanav 的头像
kanav6 个月前

@rocketdotnew love the term "vibe solutioning" lol

Alif Hossain 的头像
Alif Hossain6 个月前

@rocketdotnew If this works the way the video shows, I'm cutting out the weeks I normally spend on research and strategy before I even open a code editor. That's where all my time actually goes.

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew That's exactly what Solve does.

Your Tech Girl 的头像
Your Tech Girl6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Half my job is convincing stakeholders we're building the right thing. The other half is actually building it. This looks like it collapses the first half entirely.

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew And you can also generate a high-quality presentation for stakeholders. It's not just presentation generation capabilities, @rocketdotnew exactly know whats to write in that.

Shraddha Bharuka 的头像
Shraddha Bharuka6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Just watched the video… this actually made me rethink how I approach building.

ɱҽԃι✨ 的头像
ɱҽԃι✨6 个月前

@rocketdotnew The vibe coding space is getting crowded. But this isn't vibe coding. It's upstream of it. That's a much more interesting position to take.

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Upstream is where the leverage is. Code is a commodity now. Knowing what to code and why is the actual edge. That's where we live.

Ai With Piyas 的头像
Ai With Piyas6 个月前

@rocketdotnew That's awesome

Nayeem Sheikh 的头像
Nayeem Sheikh6 个月前

@rocketdotnew This is a big shift 🔥 finally bridging the gap between ideas and execution.

Rishabh 的头像
Rishabh6 个月前

@rocketdotnew This is where products actually win. Rocket 1.0 gets it.

Kshitij Mishra | AI & Tech 的头像
Kshitij Mishra | AI & Tech6 个月前

@rocketdotnew designers went from mandatory to optional overnight 😳

Md Riyazuddin 的头像
Md Riyazuddin6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Finally solving the “what to build” problem 👀

Pradeep Pandey 的头像
Pradeep Pandey6 个月前

@rocketdotnew Rocket 1.0 going beyond building into thinking is the real shift.

Ryan Craven 的头像
Ryan Craven6 个月前

@rocketdotnew I keep telling people this. everyone optimized for build speed. nobody asked what to build. that gap is huge.

DHRUV GANDHI 的头像
DHRUV GANDHI6 个月前

@rocketdotnew “Build from what you’ve solved”, that’s the part I focused on. Once the thinking is done, the build must be reliable enough to trust. That’s exactly what the #Rocket 1.0 ensures.

Sanchoy Hossain 的头像
Sanchoy Hossain6 个月前

@rocketdotnew The AI tooling market is racing to the bottom on code generation speed. Rocket 1.0 is playing a completely different game. Smart move.

Vishal Virani 的头像
Vishal Virani6 个月前

@rocketdotnew That was the vision from day one. It just took time to build the depth it demanded.

Khusboo Tayal 的头像
Khusboo Tayal6 个月前

@rocketdotnew This is not what I expected when I clicked play. Way bigger than another code generator.

相关视频

Culture is genetic because behavior is genetic. This beaver never saw a dam in its life. No beavers or anything else ever taught it to build a dam. It wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Many beavers together build a big dam. That is beaver culture. Humans are not different. Nothing is different. This is what life is. This is how life works. Your body is your mind. A caterpillar wants to build a chrysalis. A bee wants to build a hive. A lion wants to build a pride. You are not special. You are not above your nature. you are INSIDE of it. The thoughts that we think are genetic thoughts. The crimes we commit are genetic crimes. The art we create is genetic art. Just like this beaver, you can give the animal different sticks and it will build a different dam, but it will always build a dam. And you can give humans different "education," but the human will always use it to do what its genes tell it to do. This is the first big answer that you need. This is the biggest piece of the puzzle. This is how to understand people 90% of the way. You just... notice what they do, and get out of the way, and watch them do it. And if they need sticks, you give them sticks. And if you don't like what they do, you have to get away from them. You cannot train dam-building into them or out of them any more than you can with a beaver. A beaver wants to build a dam because it is a beaver. Whatever you see people build, that's what they wanted to build from the sticks they got in the river they were in. Stop pretending you can change it.

hoe_math = PsychoMath

1,192,107 次观看 • 1 年前