正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Rubio’s entire statement can be translated into one paragraph: America preached free markets when it was winning. Now that China is succeeding under the rules Washington claimed to worship, competition becomes “Chinese aggression,” industrial policy becomes “cheating,” and American decline becomes someone else’s crime. China never showed much interest... in becoming the world’s policeman. It would much rather let the United States stand in front, absorb the anger, finance the wars, patrol the oceans, and exhaust itself—while China develops, trades, builds, and moves forward. Washington’s real problem is not that China wants to replace it. It is that America cannot tolerate any country becoming strong enough to ignore its permission. The Soviet Union. Germany. Japan. The European Union. Whenever another power rises, American paranoia activates. It does not compete. It sanctions. Blocks. Threatens. Cuts access. Weaponizes finance. Then calls the damage “defending the rules-based order.” But China is the opponent Washington was never psychologically prepared for. The more it is contained, the more it substitutes. The more it is sanctioned, the more it builds. The more it is denied, the more it learns to live without America. The United States has no memory of rebuilding from national ruin. China does. That is why Washington experiences setbacks as humiliation, while China experiences them as instructions. And Rubio’s Taiwan remarks expose the fraud behind Washington’s language of “stability.” The United States says it opposes any change to the status quo—not because the status quo is sacred, but because permanent division serves American power. China is expected to tolerate separatism, foreign arms, political interference, and an island turned into a strategic pressure point indefinitely. Washington calls that “peace.” But any attempt by China to end the arrangement becomes “coercion.” So Rubio’s message is simple: We lost the free-market competition we claimed to believe in. China kept advancing despite our attempts to stop it. Direct confrontation is becoming too dangerous. But we still intend to preserve every geopolitical advantage created by Chinese division. America is not asking for stability because it has accepted China. It is asking for a strategic pause while keeping Taiwan frozen as leverage. Containment failed. The appetite for containment did not.show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

56,471 subscribers

36,165 次观看 • 11 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,499 次观看 • 19 天前

🚨 AMERICA CANNOT STOP CHINA 🚨 Tarik Cyril Amar argues that Rubio’s claim that Washington does not want to contain China is a strategic deception. For years, the United States tried tariffs, chip restrictions, technological pressure, and economic warfare, not only to slow China down but to force it into backward development. But China defeated that strategy. Now Washington says China may rise, but “not at America’s expense.” The problem is that China’s rise is the natural outcome of a state investing in prosperity, industry, technology, and national development. And even if China stood still, America’s decline would still make China look stronger by comparison. But the American empire wants to blame China for a decline created by its own ruling class. .Tarik Cyril Amar .Syriana Analysis

🚨 AMERICA CANNOT STOP CHINA 🚨 Tarik Cyril Amar argues that Rubio’s claim that Washington does not want to contain China is a strategic deception. For years, the United States tried tariffs, chip restrictions, technological pressure, and economic warfare, not only to slow China down but to force it into backward development. But China defeated that strategy. Now Washington says China may rise, but “not at America’s expense.” The problem is that China’s rise is the natural outcome of a state investing in prosperity, industry, technology, and national development. And even if China stood still, America’s decline would still make China look stronger by comparison. But the American empire wants to blame China for a decline created by its own ruling class. .Tarik Cyril Amar .Syriana Analysis

Kevork Almassian

19,145 次观看 • 2 个月前

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

Predictive History

24,046 次观看 • 2 个月前

Mearsheimer says China is America’s mortal enemy. He still reads China through an American mirror. He assumes China wants America destroyed because America cannot imagine a world where it is merely one power among others. That is the sickness. For Washington, if it cannot dominate the planet, it feels like death. If it cannot sanction, bomb, blockade, and dictate, it calls that “decline.” If another civilization rises without asking permission, it calls that an existential threat. But China’s political instinct is not American messianism. 齐家，治国，平天下。 Settle the family. Govern the country. Bring order under heaven. That is an old civilizational logic. Not crusader logic. China has repeated the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence for decades: mutual respect for sovereignty, non-aggression, non-interference, equality, peaceful coexistence. America cannot practice that for one week. Mearsheimer assumes China will behave like America once it becomes strong: eliminate rivals, control regions, punish disobedience, turn insecurity into doctrine. But to Chinese civilization, competition is not terrifying. The absence of competition is. Look at America after the Cold War. Look at Europe after it surrendered strategy to Washington. No rival. No restraint. No wisdom. Just arrogance rotting into decay. The US looks at China and sees its own reflection. China looks at the US and sees history’s warning.

Mearsheimer says China is America’s mortal enemy. He still reads China through an American mirror. He assumes China wants America destroyed because America cannot imagine a world where it is merely one power among others. That is the sickness. For Washington, if it cannot dominate the planet, it feels like death. If it cannot sanction, bomb, blockade, and dictate, it calls that “decline.” If another civilization rises without asking permission, it calls that an existential threat. But China’s political instinct is not American messianism. 齐家，治国，平天下。 Settle the family. Govern the country. Bring order under heaven. That is an old civilizational logic. Not crusader logic. China has repeated the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence for decades: mutual respect for sovereignty, non-aggression, non-interference, equality, peaceful coexistence. America cannot practice that for one week. Mearsheimer assumes China will behave like America once it becomes strong: eliminate rivals, control regions, punish disobedience, turn insecurity into doctrine. But to Chinese civilization, competition is not terrifying. The absence of competition is. Look at America after the Cold War. Look at Europe after it surrendered strategy to Washington. No rival. No restraint. No wisdom. Just arrogance rotting into decay. The US looks at China and sees its own reflection. China looks at the US and sees history’s warning.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

22,724 次观看 • 27 天前

Beijing fires back with a brutal reality check after the U.S. blamed China for “late notice” on its missile test. The funniest part is that the United States actually thinks it has the moral standing to lecture China on missile tests. The U.S. is the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons. The U.S. has conducted more than 300 intercontinental ballistic missile tests in the Pacific Ocean over the years. It sits on the world’s largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal. It routinely launches strategic missile tests from nuclear submarines. But when China conducts one routine test, notified in advance and not aimed at any country, Washington suddenly becomes the priest of “standards.” The problem is not missile tests. The problem is that China is no longer asking permission to defend itself. Washington is used to being the only country allowed to point missiles at the world while calling it stability. So China tests one missile, and suddenly the arsonist wants to inspect the fire code.

Beijing fires back with a brutal reality check after the U.S. blamed China for “late notice” on its missile test. The funniest part is that the United States actually thinks it has the moral standing to lecture China on missile tests. The U.S. is the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons. The U.S. has conducted more than 300 intercontinental ballistic missile tests in the Pacific Ocean over the years. It sits on the world’s largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal. It routinely launches strategic missile tests from nuclear submarines. But when China conducts one routine test, notified in advance and not aimed at any country, Washington suddenly becomes the priest of “standards.” The problem is not missile tests. The problem is that China is no longer asking permission to defend itself. Washington is used to being the only country allowed to point missiles at the world while calling it stability. So China tests one missile, and suddenly the arsonist wants to inspect the fire code.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

72,621 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 CHINA BUILDS WHILE AMERICA BURNS BILLIONS 🚨 Marco Rubio says America does not want to contain China, but China should not rise at America’s expense. However, who is actually draining America? While China builds infrastructure, expands manufacturing, and signs business deals across the world, Washington is spending $1 billion a day on war in Iran and maintaining hundreds of military bases across the globe. That money is not being spent for the American people. It is being burned in West Asia to weaken Iran, control the Strait of Hormuz, and secure Israel’s dream of becoming the dominant empire of the region. American taxpayers are being sucked dry while China invests in its future. So maybe the problem is not that China is rising. Maybe the problem is that the United States chose empire over its own people.

🚨 CHINA BUILDS WHILE AMERICA BURNS BILLIONS 🚨 Marco Rubio says America does not want to contain China, but China should not rise at America’s expense. However, who is actually draining America? While China builds infrastructure, expands manufacturing, and signs business deals across the world, Washington is spending $1 billion a day on war in Iran and maintaining hundreds of military bases across the globe. That money is not being spent for the American people. It is being burned in West Asia to weaken Iran, control the Strait of Hormuz, and secure Israel’s dream of becoming the dominant empire of the region. American taxpayers are being sucked dry while China invests in its future. So maybe the problem is not that China is rising. Maybe the problem is that the United States chose empire over its own people.

Kevork Almassian

30,931 次观看 • 3 个月前

China’s message on Taiwan was not routine diplomatic language. Xi did not simply “raise the Taiwan question.” He framed it as the most important issue in China-U.S. relations, warned of collision, conflict, and dangerous consequences, and made clear that “Taiwan independence” and peace across the Strait cannot coexist. That is the part many people are missing. In 2017, China was still telling Washington not to let Taiwan “disturb” bilateral ties. In 2026, China is telling Washington: mishandle Taiwan, and the entire China-U.S. relationship enters danger. Same Trump. Different China. America and the West are still thinking in 2017 terms — trade pressure, symbolic gestures, alliance theater, “strategic ambiguity.” But China is no longer the China Trump met nine years ago. The red line has not moved. The power behind it has.

China’s message on Taiwan was not routine diplomatic language. Xi did not simply “raise the Taiwan question.” He framed it as the most important issue in China-U.S. relations, warned of collision, conflict, and dangerous consequences, and made clear that “Taiwan independence” and peace across the Strait cannot coexist. That is the part many people are missing. In 2017, China was still telling Washington not to let Taiwan “disturb” bilateral ties. In 2026, China is telling Washington: mishandle Taiwan, and the entire China-U.S. relationship enters danger. Same Trump. Different China. America and the West are still thinking in 2017 terms — trade pressure, symbolic gestures, alliance theater, “strategic ambiguity.” But China is no longer the China Trump met nine years ago. The red line has not moved. The power behind it has.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

15,183 次观看 • 3 个月前

Argentina's Milei: The United States does trade with China, and the way we see it, China is a great trading partner. It means a lot of opportunities for us to expand markets, so that is not any source of conflict.

Argentina's Milei: The United States does trade with China, and the way we see it, China is a great trading partner. It means a lot of opportunities for us to expand markets, so that is not any source of conflict.

Clash Report

38,170 次观看 • 6 个月前

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,808 次观看 • 3 个月前

The EU has mastered one trick: When it wins, it calls it free trade. When China wins, it calls it overdependence. For decades, European cars, appliances, luxury goods, chemicals, machinery, and high-end consumer products entered the Chinese market. China did not cry that Europe was “distorting” its market or creating “dependency.” China competed. China learned. China upgraded. But the moment Chinese industries became competitive, Europe suddenly discovered “strategic risk.” Solar panels? Europe blocked and punished Chinese solar for years with tariffs and trade barriers. Did that revive Europe’s own solar industry? No. It only made Europe’s energy transition more expensive until it eventually had to reopen the door. Huawei and ZTE? Europe followed Washington’s pressure campaign, ripped out Chinese telecom infrastructure it had already deployed, spent more money, delayed its own networks, and called that “security.” Energy? Europe chose geopolitical obedience, cut itself off from cheap Russian energy, raised its own industrial costs, became more dependent on the U.S., and then watched its companies move across the Atlantic under American subsidies and tariffs. But somehow the problem is still China. Please. Europe’s crisis was not created by Chinese overcapacity. It was created by European complacency, American dependency, ideological industrial policy, expensive energy, and decades of mistaking moral lectures for competitiveness. Now Chinese industries are faster, cheaper, more integrated, and more efficient — from EVs to batteries, solar, electronics, ports, logistics, and manufacturing ecosystems. So Europe invents new language: “Diversification.” “De-risking.” “Overdependence.” “Fair competition.” But strip away the diplomatic costume, and it is just protectionism with Brussels paperwork. China did not force Europe to deindustrialize itself. Europe made its choices. It followed Washington. It sanctioned its own energy base. It taxed its own consumers. It slowed its own innovation. It lectured China while China built. And now it wants China to pay for Europe’s failure to compete. No. China-EU trade is not a charity program for declining European industries. If Europe wants competitiveness, it should build it. Not rename protectionism as “diversification” and expect China to applaud.

The EU has mastered one trick: When it wins, it calls it free trade. When China wins, it calls it overdependence. For decades, European cars, appliances, luxury goods, chemicals, machinery, and high-end consumer products entered the Chinese market. China did not cry that Europe was “distorting” its market or creating “dependency.” China competed. China learned. China upgraded. But the moment Chinese industries became competitive, Europe suddenly discovered “strategic risk.” Solar panels? Europe blocked and punished Chinese solar for years with tariffs and trade barriers. Did that revive Europe’s own solar industry? No. It only made Europe’s energy transition more expensive until it eventually had to reopen the door. Huawei and ZTE? Europe followed Washington’s pressure campaign, ripped out Chinese telecom infrastructure it had already deployed, spent more money, delayed its own networks, and called that “security.” Energy? Europe chose geopolitical obedience, cut itself off from cheap Russian energy, raised its own industrial costs, became more dependent on the U.S., and then watched its companies move across the Atlantic under American subsidies and tariffs. But somehow the problem is still China. Please. Europe’s crisis was not created by Chinese overcapacity. It was created by European complacency, American dependency, ideological industrial policy, expensive energy, and decades of mistaking moral lectures for competitiveness. Now Chinese industries are faster, cheaper, more integrated, and more efficient — from EVs to batteries, solar, electronics, ports, logistics, and manufacturing ecosystems. So Europe invents new language: “Diversification.” “De-risking.” “Overdependence.” “Fair competition.” But strip away the diplomatic costume, and it is just protectionism with Brussels paperwork. China did not force Europe to deindustrialize itself. Europe made its choices. It followed Washington. It sanctioned its own energy base. It taxed its own consumers. It slowed its own innovation. It lectured China while China built. And now it wants China to pay for Europe’s failure to compete. No. China-EU trade is not a charity program for declining European industries. If Europe wants competitiveness, it should build it. Not rename protectionism as “diversification” and expect China to applaud.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

47,361 次观看 • 2 个月前

Manila is not a “victim.” It is auditioning to become Asia’s Israel: small-state hysteria, Western sponsorship, constant provocation, permanent victim theater, and zero regard for the civilians it uses as props. The Philippines knows China will not behave like the United States. China will not bomb fishing boats and order “kill them all.” So Manila keeps pushing poor fishermen and small boats into confrontations, betting Filipino lives on Chinese restraint. The Marcos administration is not protecting the Philippines. It is renting the country out as a forward operating stage for America’s Asia-Pacific containment script. Japan claps because it wants Asia unstable. America claps because it wants another powder keg. That is why China is angry. Not because Manila is “small.” But because Manila is trying to import Middle East-style chaos into Asia. Asia does not need another powder keg. And China will not let the South China Sea become one.

Manila is not a “victim.” It is auditioning to become Asia’s Israel: small-state hysteria, Western sponsorship, constant provocation, permanent victim theater, and zero regard for the civilians it uses as props. The Philippines knows China will not behave like the United States. China will not bomb fishing boats and order “kill them all.” So Manila keeps pushing poor fishermen and small boats into confrontations, betting Filipino lives on Chinese restraint. The Marcos administration is not protecting the Philippines. It is renting the country out as a forward operating stage for America’s Asia-Pacific containment script. Japan claps because it wants Asia unstable. America claps because it wants another powder keg. That is why China is angry. Not because Manila is “small.” But because Manila is trying to import Middle East-style chaos into Asia. Asia does not need another powder keg. And China will not let the South China Sea become one.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,355 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

235,419 次观看 • 2 个月前

CNN: He claimed that China builds a lot of wind turbines and manufactures them for others, but refuses to use it itself, barely uses wind power. In fact, China is the world leader in the use of wind power. It is building additional wind power in China far faster than the pace at which the U.S. Is building in the United States itself. So the idea that China is just, you know, foisting this terrible source of energy on other countries while refusing to use it is a reversal of reality.

CNN: He claimed that China builds a lot of wind turbines and manufactures them for others, but refuses to use it itself, barely uses wind power. In fact, China is the world leader in the use of wind power. It is building additional wind power in China far faster than the pace at which the U.S. Is building in the United States itself. So the idea that China is just, you know, foisting this terrible source of energy on other countries while refusing to use it is a reversal of reality.

Acyn

213,926 次观看 • 10 个月前

What this video really exposes is Japan’s strategic humiliation. Sanae Takaichi can say, “a Taiwan emergency is a Japan emergency,” and posture as if Japan were drawing red lines with China. But the confidence behind that line comes not from Japanese sovereignty, only from domestic populism and the assumption that the United States will remain the ultimate backer. That is Japan’s dilemma. It wants to act tough toward China, while constantly making itself useful and obedient enough not to be discarded by Washington. And that is exactly why Trump-style America is so dangerous for Tokyo. Trump does not respect loyalty; he's obsessed with power. The more Japan flatters, the less equal it becomes. Because Trump discards imperial pets faster than enemies — he only respects those who have the ability to say “no.” This is why postwar Japan remains trapped between performance and dependence: outwardly feigned strategic autonomy while outsourcing its security identity to its master. And unlike Europe, Japan faces a deeper problem in China: it is not dealing only with rivalry, but with an unresolved civilizational wound. China does not hate Japan merely because Japan is pro-American. China hates Japan because Japan invaded, massacred, and brutalized it on a historic scale. What makes Japan even less respected is that it shows arrogance toward the people it once slaughtered and still tries to project itself as a moral actor in Asia, while showing extraordinary obedience toward the power that bombed Tokyo and atomized Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For the Chinese, that is what makes Japan uniquely contemptible: arrogant toward its victims, submissive toward its master, and still pretending to stand upright.

What this video really exposes is Japan’s strategic humiliation. Sanae Takaichi can say, “a Taiwan emergency is a Japan emergency,” and posture as if Japan were drawing red lines with China. But the confidence behind that line comes not from Japanese sovereignty, only from domestic populism and the assumption that the United States will remain the ultimate backer. That is Japan’s dilemma. It wants to act tough toward China, while constantly making itself useful and obedient enough not to be discarded by Washington. And that is exactly why Trump-style America is so dangerous for Tokyo. Trump does not respect loyalty; he's obsessed with power. The more Japan flatters, the less equal it becomes. Because Trump discards imperial pets faster than enemies — he only respects those who have the ability to say “no.” This is why postwar Japan remains trapped between performance and dependence: outwardly feigned strategic autonomy while outsourcing its security identity to its master. And unlike Europe, Japan faces a deeper problem in China: it is not dealing only with rivalry, but with an unresolved civilizational wound. China does not hate Japan merely because Japan is pro-American. China hates Japan because Japan invaded, massacred, and brutalized it on a historic scale. What makes Japan even less respected is that it shows arrogance toward the people it once slaughtered and still tries to project itself as a moral actor in Asia, while showing extraordinary obedience toward the power that bombed Tokyo and atomized Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For the Chinese, that is what makes Japan uniquely contemptible: arrogant toward its victims, submissive toward its master, and still pretending to stand upright.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

45,863 次观看 • 4 个月前

The funniest part of JD Vance’s speech is the ending: “I am angry about the rise of China… but I am most angry that American leadership let it happen.” Let it happen? As if China’s rise was an American clerical error. As if 1.4 billion people industrialized because Washington forgot to lock the door. China was sanctioned, contained, smeared, tariffed, and technologically strangled. And still it became the world’s strongest industrial economy. India had the population. India had English. India had earlier access to the WTO. India had Western approval, “democracy” branding, and decades of geopolitical courtship. Capital still chose China. Factories still chose China. Supply chains still chose China. Why? Because civilization is not built by flattering Washington. It is built by infrastructure, discipline, engineers, workers, logistics, electricity, education, and state capacity. America’s next ten years are not about competing with China. That phase is already over. America is now competing with India for who can disappoint capital less. China’s real opponent was never America. China’s real opponent is its own execution, its own discipline, its own ability to keep building without believing Western noise. Vance is angry because China rose. But what really humiliates him is this: America tried to stop it. And China rose anyway.

The funniest part of JD Vance’s speech is the ending: “I am angry about the rise of China… but I am most angry that American leadership let it happen.” Let it happen? As if China’s rise was an American clerical error. As if 1.4 billion people industrialized because Washington forgot to lock the door. China was sanctioned, contained, smeared, tariffed, and technologically strangled. And still it became the world’s strongest industrial economy. India had the population. India had English. India had earlier access to the WTO. India had Western approval, “democracy” branding, and decades of geopolitical courtship. Capital still chose China. Factories still chose China. Supply chains still chose China. Why? Because civilization is not built by flattering Washington. It is built by infrastructure, discipline, engineers, workers, logistics, electricity, education, and state capacity. America’s next ten years are not about competing with China. That phase is already over. America is now competing with India for who can disappoint capital less. China’s real opponent was never America. China’s real opponent is its own execution, its own discipline, its own ability to keep building without believing Western noise. Vance is angry because China rose. But what really humiliates him is this: America tried to stop it. And China rose anyway.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

471,770 次观看 • 1 个月前

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn't)...now they have to be punished." China is a target for one reason and one reason only: China refused to develop its economy to resemble a colony of Washington. Instead it developed its economy to staggering heights with an alternative economic system, showing the world that American capitalism is not the only model for development left in the world after the collapse of Soviet communism. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, China refused to bend the knee to Washington’s hegemonic diktats. The US would rather go to war with China rather than allow it to surpass it economically, and any country that doesn’t obey US diktats is viewed as an enemy.

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn't)...now they have to be punished." China is a target for one reason and one reason only: China refused to develop its economy to resemble a colony of Washington. Instead it developed its economy to staggering heights with an alternative economic system, showing the world that American capitalism is not the only model for development left in the world after the collapse of Soviet communism. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, China refused to bend the knee to Washington’s hegemonic diktats. The US would rather go to war with China rather than allow it to surpass it economically, and any country that doesn’t obey US diktats is viewed as an enemy.

Afshin Rattansi

380,783 次观看 • 10 个月前

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

29,202 次观看 • 2 个月前

Mearsheimer says China could not rise peacefully. But the comments got to the real question: China already rose peacefully. It did not bomb its way into the world’s second-largest economy. It did not build 800 overseas military bases. It did not sanction half the planet. It did not invade, assassinate, regime-change, and call it “order.” China rose through factories, ports, railways, power grids, shipyards, engineers, workers, and decades of national discipline. The real question is not whether China can rise peacefully. It already did. The question is whether America can decline peacefully. And that is where the real danger begins.

Mearsheimer says China could not rise peacefully. But the comments got to the real question: China already rose peacefully. It did not bomb its way into the world’s second-largest economy. It did not build 800 overseas military bases. It did not sanction half the planet. It did not invade, assassinate, regime-change, and call it “order.” China rose through factories, ports, railways, power grids, shipyards, engineers, workers, and decades of national discipline. The real question is not whether China can rise peacefully. It already did. The question is whether America can decline peacefully. And that is where the real danger begins.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

99,125 次观看 • 2 个月前

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Everyone thinks giving Taiwan to China is a concession. It's not. Taiwan blocks China from the Pacific. That's its only strategic value to America. But if China owns Taiwan — Taiwan now blocks Japan and South Korea from the Strait of Malacca. Suddenly Japan and South Korea have to stop China from taking Taiwan. At their own expense. Their own military. Their own risk. Trump just transferred the Taiwan problem from America to its allies. And in return China opens its financial markets. 1.4 billion people finance American debt. Giving Taiwan to China is not a concession. It is the trade of the century.

Predictive History

35,185 次观看 • 2 个月前

JUST IN China will never allow Japan to become the ‘Israel of Asia’ and terrorize the region again. Japan’s problem is not that China no longer considers the matter ‘important’; its problem is that it still imagines that American protection can inflate its actual geopolitical weight. China does not care whether Tokyo flatters itself. It only demands that Japan stop causing trouble, stop provoking, and stop mistaking borrowed power for national courage. Asia has remained more stable than the Middle West for one reason: China exists.

JUST IN China will never allow Japan to become the ‘Israel of Asia’ and terrorize the region again. Japan’s problem is not that China no longer considers the matter ‘important’; its problem is that it still imagines that American protection can inflate its actual geopolitical weight. China does not care whether Tokyo flatters itself. It only demands that Japan stop causing trouble, stop provoking, and stop mistaking borrowed power for national courage. Asia has remained more stable than the Middle West for one reason: China exists.

China Times

116,979 次观看 • 15 小时前