Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🇷🇺 Russian scientists develop gel that heals brain damage without surgery The hydrogel with magnetoelectric nanoparticles simultaneously stimulates nerve regeneration and fights inflammation after traumatic brain injury 🔸 The hydrogel is made from collagen, hyaluronic acid, and metformin 🔸 The nanoparticles convert external magnetic fields into local electrical signals—which... trigger the formation of new neural tissue wirelessly, without direct contact 🔸 The gel also delivers an anti-inflammatory drug directly to the damaged area, protecting healthy tissue while promoting healing 🔸 Lab tests showed spatial orientation and memory restored after brain injury If scaled up, the method could help treat one of the most difficult conditions to heal without invasive surgery.show more

Sputnik

499,945 subscribers

18,962 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Gesundheit & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Your brain has its own security team, cleanup crew, and maintenance staff all rolled into one type of cell. This video shows microglia, the immune cells that live inside the brain. They move through neural tissue, scan for problems, and keep the environment healthy so neurons can work properly. 🟡 They detect early signs of trouble Microglia sense chemical signals from stressed or injured neurons and move toward the source. ➡️ Example: After a small head injury, microglia are often the first responders. 🟡 They clean and repair Microglia remove debris, damaged proteins, and dead cells to prevent buildup that disrupts brain function. ➡️ Example: During aging, they help clear cellular waste that would otherwise slow down neural communication. 🟡 They shape learning and memory Microglia prune weak or unnecessary synapses, helping the brain stay efficient and flexible. ➡️ Example: During sleep, they help reorganize neural connections so memories form and stabilize. 🟡 They regulate inflammation Microglia decide when inflammation should start and when it should stop. ➡️ Example: Balanced microglia protect brain tissue, while chronically overactive ones contribute to conditions like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Microglia protect, clean, and fine-tune the brain every second. When they work well, cognition, mood, and resilience remain strong. When they lose balance, the brain becomes more vulnerable to inflammation, aging, and disease.

Your brain has its own security team, cleanup crew, and maintenance staff all rolled into one type of cell. This video shows microglia, the immune cells that live inside the brain. They move through neural tissue, scan for problems, and keep the environment healthy so neurons can work properly. 🟡 They detect early signs of trouble Microglia sense chemical signals from stressed or injured neurons and move toward the source. ➡️ Example: After a small head injury, microglia are often the first responders. 🟡 They clean and repair Microglia remove debris, damaged proteins, and dead cells to prevent buildup that disrupts brain function. ➡️ Example: During aging, they help clear cellular waste that would otherwise slow down neural communication. 🟡 They shape learning and memory Microglia prune weak or unnecessary synapses, helping the brain stay efficient and flexible. ➡️ Example: During sleep, they help reorganize neural connections so memories form and stabilize. 🟡 They regulate inflammation Microglia decide when inflammation should start and when it should stop. ➡️ Example: Balanced microglia protect brain tissue, while chronically overactive ones contribute to conditions like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Microglia protect, clean, and fine-tune the brain every second. When they work well, cognition, mood, and resilience remain strong. When they lose balance, the brain becomes more vulnerable to inflammation, aging, and disease.

William A. Wallace, Ph.D.

18,581 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Neuralink’s new approach inserts ultra-thin electrode threads directly through the intact dura and into the cortex....without cutting the dura open This is a huge surgical milestone The dura is the tough protective membrane covering the brain. Normally, reaching the cortex means cutting through that layer....one of the most delicate steps in brain surgery This could make BCI surgery: • Less invasive • More precise • More repeatable • Easier to scale • Safer for future patients The participant was controlling a cursor with their thoughts within an hour of surgery, with recovery progressing as expected This is a major step toward bringing brain-computer interfaces to people who have lost the ability to move, communicate, or interact with the world normally

Neuralink’s new approach inserts ultra-thin electrode threads directly through the intact dura and into the cortex....without cutting the dura open This is a huge surgical milestone The dura is the tough protective membrane covering the brain. Normally, reaching the cortex means cutting through that layer....one of the most delicate steps in brain surgery This could make BCI surgery: • Less invasive • More precise • More repeatable • Easier to scale • Safer for future patients The participant was controlling a cursor with their thoughts within an hour of surgery, with recovery progressing as expected This is a major step toward bringing brain-computer interfaces to people who have lost the ability to move, communicate, or interact with the world normally

X Freeze

21,615 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE NANOTECHNOLOGY THROUGH mRNA VACCINES. Since Moderna called their mRNA jabs an "operating system" designed to program humans, people were confused and nervous. And they should be. The type of tech that these pharmaceutical companies are developing along with other leading companies like the Pentagon's DARPA and many other leading researchers and tech innovators with self-assembling and other types of nanotechnology, developing sensors, electrodes, and BMI devices to enter the body through mRNA vaccines and other methods to have control, monitor, induce behavior, emotions, functions, even read and write to the brain, etc., are literally terrifying. This isn't something that's coming within the next 5 to 10 years. It's already here. Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), as a cutting-edge technology, refers to the establishment of a direct communication channel between the brain and peripheral electronic devices to realize the efficient information exchange between people and machines. It in a narrow sense refers to the establishment between the brain and the external environment does not depend on the peripheral nerve and muscle new communication and control channel, by measuring and collecting the central nervous system activity, and its directly translated can be recognized by external artificial equipment signal or instruction, so as to realize the direct communication and control of the brain and external equipment. Generalized brain computer interface includes input BCI, output BCI and interactive BCI, the input BCI is by external equipment or machine to the brain input electrical, magnetic, acoustic and optical stimulation of brain-computer interface system, output BCI is the signal of the brain into the external equipment control instructions, interactive BCI is by feedback nerve output and input link connected to form a closed loop brain computer interface system. Nanotechnology plays a key role in the innovative applications of neuroscience and brain computer interfaces. By taking advantage of the unique properties of ministerial, such as high conductivity, biocompatibility and regulation, scientists are able to design more sophisticated and efficient brain-computer interface devices. These devices can not only realize the precise recording and stimulation of nerve signals, but also promote the repair and regeneration of nerve tissue, providing new tools and means for neuroscience research and clinical application. Therefore, the innovative application of self-assembling, biodegradable, graphene, etc., nanotechnology in the interface between neuroscience and brain computer technology is gradually promoting the rapid development of this field, providing infinite possibilities for humans to explore the mysteries of the brain and improve the neural function. Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) enable direct communication between the brain and external devices, but their performance heavily depends on the quality of the electrodes. Traditional materials, such as gold and platinum, offer high conductivity but often struggle with biocompatibility and can cause tissue damage due to their mechanical mismatch with neural tissue. While conductive polymers provide greater flexibility, they frequently fall short in electrical performance. Nanomaterials, including carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene, are increasingly considered promising alternatives. These materials combine high conductivity with mechanical flexibility and offer potential improvements in biocompatibility, enhancing the capture and transmission of neural signals. Hybrid materials, which integrate conductive polymers with nanomaterials, have also shown potential by balancing flexibility and signal quality. This review examines recent advancements in nanomaterial-based BCI electrodes and focuses on how these new materials address the limitations of traditional electrodes. It also discusses emerging tools like metallic nanoparticles and nanowires, along with the ongoing challenges of biocompatibility, tissue integration, and ethical considerations. As nanotechnology continues to evolve, it has the potential to significantly enhance the functionality and longevity of BCIs, making them more effective in facilitating neural communication. Nanotechnology, as the frontier field of the development of science and technology in the 21st century, is gradually penetrating into the research of neuroscience and brain-computer interface, injecting new vitality and possibilities into this interdisciplinary subject. With the deepening of human cognition of the brain, neuroscience and brain-computer interface technology has increasingly become a bridge connecting the biological world and the digital world, aiming to interpret the brain information and realize human-computer interaction through advanced technological means, and then promote the innovation of medical treatment, rehabilitation, intelligent control and other fields. The introduction of nanotechnology provides a different perspective and means to solve the technical problems in the field of neuroscience and brain-computer interface. Antimalarial, with their unique structural characteristics, excellent photoelectric properties and excellent mechanical properties, show great potential in the application of neural interfaces. In structure, the small size effect of ministerial enables them to combine more closely with nerve cells to reduce tissue damage during implantation. In terms of photoelectric properties, the high electrical conductivity and tunable optical properties of ministerial enable the accurate recording and stimulation of nerve signals. In mechanical properties, the toughness and elasticity of ministerial ensure their stability and reliability in the long-term implantation process. These improvements in properties not only significantly enhance the biocompatibility of neural interfaces and reduce the risk of immune response, but also greatly improve the transmission efficiency and accuracy of neural signals, laying a solid foundation for the further progress of neuroscience and brain-computer interface technology. The main nanomaterials in the brain-computer interface is classified according to the organic nanomaterials in the composition, such as carbon nanotubes, graphite and nanoseconds, play an important role in neuroscience and brain-computer interfaces with their superior biocompatibility, high conductivity and lightweight properties. They need to be able to enhance electrode flexibility, improve signal recording quality and stimulation efficiency. Semiconductor ministerial, such as organic electrochemical transistors, have excellent ionic and electron conduction properties and can serve as an interactive interface between biology and electronics to achieve highly sensitive signal detection. As a typical spongy and wet material, hydrogel is widely studied and used because of its unique mechanical properties, biocompatibility and ionic conductivity. It can provide a good carrier for a variety of inorganic ministerial and build composites with better performance. There are also magnetic antiparticle, quantum dots and up conversion antiparticle, which play an important role in advanced imaging technologies and can realize the visualization of specific pathological markers or cellular processes, contributing to the early diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases. Although these technologies are great for people with disabilities or illnesses, just like many other technologies, it's already being weaponized as developments are already in the process with innovations and numerous methods of control and the monetization of certain aspects throughout this technology. This is a government's dream weapon and privacy will cease to exists along with your own thoughts. This is the world that is sadly already here and in major development for our society. The part that should scare everyone is that this type of technology and nanomaterial is already in some mRNA vaccines, in our food supply, and being sprayed on us, animals, and our food from above. Sadly, how much they've been lying to us. Let's just say it wouldn't surprise me if a large amount of people around the globe have some kind of self-assembling, nanotechnology inside them already. Especially the people who took the jabs during covid. I suggest to really do your own research before considering taking any vaccines or shots in general. The writing is on the wall, complete control is the goal, and it's already here.

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE NANOTECHNOLOGY THROUGH mRNA VACCINES. Since Moderna called their mRNA jabs an "operating system" designed to program humans, people were confused and nervous. And they should be. The type of tech that these pharmaceutical companies are developing along with other leading companies like the Pentagon's DARPA and many other leading researchers and tech innovators with self-assembling and other types of nanotechnology, developing sensors, electrodes, and BMI devices to enter the body through mRNA vaccines and other methods to have control, monitor, induce behavior, emotions, functions, even read and write to the brain, etc., are literally terrifying. This isn't something that's coming within the next 5 to 10 years. It's already here. Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), as a cutting-edge technology, refers to the establishment of a direct communication channel between the brain and peripheral electronic devices to realize the efficient information exchange between people and machines. It in a narrow sense refers to the establishment between the brain and the external environment does not depend on the peripheral nerve and muscle new communication and control channel, by measuring and collecting the central nervous system activity, and its directly translated can be recognized by external artificial equipment signal or instruction, so as to realize the direct communication and control of the brain and external equipment. Generalized brain computer interface includes input BCI, output BCI and interactive BCI, the input BCI is by external equipment or machine to the brain input electrical, magnetic, acoustic and optical stimulation of brain-computer interface system, output BCI is the signal of the brain into the external equipment control instructions, interactive BCI is by feedback nerve output and input link connected to form a closed loop brain computer interface system. Nanotechnology plays a key role in the innovative applications of neuroscience and brain computer interfaces. By taking advantage of the unique properties of ministerial, such as high conductivity, biocompatibility and regulation, scientists are able to design more sophisticated and efficient brain-computer interface devices. These devices can not only realize the precise recording and stimulation of nerve signals, but also promote the repair and regeneration of nerve tissue, providing new tools and means for neuroscience research and clinical application. Therefore, the innovative application of self-assembling, biodegradable, graphene, etc., nanotechnology in the interface between neuroscience and brain computer technology is gradually promoting the rapid development of this field, providing infinite possibilities for humans to explore the mysteries of the brain and improve the neural function. Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) enable direct communication between the brain and external devices, but their performance heavily depends on the quality of the electrodes. Traditional materials, such as gold and platinum, offer high conductivity but often struggle with biocompatibility and can cause tissue damage due to their mechanical mismatch with neural tissue. While conductive polymers provide greater flexibility, they frequently fall short in electrical performance. Nanomaterials, including carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene, are increasingly considered promising alternatives. These materials combine high conductivity with mechanical flexibility and offer potential improvements in biocompatibility, enhancing the capture and transmission of neural signals. Hybrid materials, which integrate conductive polymers with nanomaterials, have also shown potential by balancing flexibility and signal quality. This review examines recent advancements in nanomaterial-based BCI electrodes and focuses on how these new materials address the limitations of traditional electrodes. It also discusses emerging tools like metallic nanoparticles and nanowires, along with the ongoing challenges of biocompatibility, tissue integration, and ethical considerations. As nanotechnology continues to evolve, it has the potential to significantly enhance the functionality and longevity of BCIs, making them more effective in facilitating neural communication. Nanotechnology, as the frontier field of the development of science and technology in the 21st century, is gradually penetrating into the research of neuroscience and brain-computer interface, injecting new vitality and possibilities into this interdisciplinary subject. With the deepening of human cognition of the brain, neuroscience and brain-computer interface technology has increasingly become a bridge connecting the biological world and the digital world, aiming to interpret the brain information and realize human-computer interaction through advanced technological means, and then promote the innovation of medical treatment, rehabilitation, intelligent control and other fields. The introduction of nanotechnology provides a different perspective and means to solve the technical problems in the field of neuroscience and brain-computer interface. Antimalarial, with their unique structural characteristics, excellent photoelectric properties and excellent mechanical properties, show great potential in the application of neural interfaces. In structure, the small size effect of ministerial enables them to combine more closely with nerve cells to reduce tissue damage during implantation. In terms of photoelectric properties, the high electrical conductivity and tunable optical properties of ministerial enable the accurate recording and stimulation of nerve signals. In mechanical properties, the toughness and elasticity of ministerial ensure their stability and reliability in the long-term implantation process. These improvements in properties not only significantly enhance the biocompatibility of neural interfaces and reduce the risk of immune response, but also greatly improve the transmission efficiency and accuracy of neural signals, laying a solid foundation for the further progress of neuroscience and brain-computer interface technology. The main nanomaterials in the brain-computer interface is classified according to the organic nanomaterials in the composition, such as carbon nanotubes, graphite and nanoseconds, play an important role in neuroscience and brain-computer interfaces with their superior biocompatibility, high conductivity and lightweight properties. They need to be able to enhance electrode flexibility, improve signal recording quality and stimulation efficiency. Semiconductor ministerial, such as organic electrochemical transistors, have excellent ionic and electron conduction properties and can serve as an interactive interface between biology and electronics to achieve highly sensitive signal detection. As a typical spongy and wet material, hydrogel is widely studied and used because of its unique mechanical properties, biocompatibility and ionic conductivity. It can provide a good carrier for a variety of inorganic ministerial and build composites with better performance. There are also magnetic antiparticle, quantum dots and up conversion antiparticle, which play an important role in advanced imaging technologies and can realize the visualization of specific pathological markers or cellular processes, contributing to the early diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative diseases. Although these technologies are great for people with disabilities or illnesses, just like many other technologies, it's already being weaponized as developments are already in the process with innovations and numerous methods of control and the monetization of certain aspects throughout this technology. This is a government's dream weapon and privacy will cease to exists along with your own thoughts. This is the world that is sadly already here and in major development for our society. The part that should scare everyone is that this type of technology and nanomaterial is already in some mRNA vaccines, in our food supply, and being sprayed on us, animals, and our food from above. Sadly, how much they've been lying to us. Let's just say it wouldn't surprise me if a large amount of people around the globe have some kind of self-assembling, nanotechnology inside them already. Especially the people who took the jabs during covid. I suggest to really do your own research before considering taking any vaccines or shots in general. The writing is on the wall, complete control is the goal, and it's already here.

The SCIF

25,975 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Medical innovation: Apollo Cancer Centres introduces ZAP-X, a breakthrough gyroscopic radiosurgery platform and one of the world’s most advanced technologies for treating brain tumours without surgery. As South Asia’s first centre to offer ZAP-X, Apollo brings a new level of precision, comfort, and safety to radiosurgery. ZAP-X uses a frameless, self-shielded, gyroscopic design to deliver highly targeted radiation from multiple angles- destroying tumours while protecting healthy brain tissue. With no incision, no pain, and no hospital stay required, patients can walk in and walk out the same day. #ApolloHospitals #ZapX #HealthTech

Medical innovation: Apollo Cancer Centres introduces ZAP-X, a breakthrough gyroscopic radiosurgery platform and one of the world’s most advanced technologies for treating brain tumours without surgery. As South Asia’s first centre to offer ZAP-X, Apollo brings a new level of precision, comfort, and safety to radiosurgery. ZAP-X uses a frameless, self-shielded, gyroscopic design to deliver highly targeted radiation from multiple angles- destroying tumours while protecting healthy brain tissue. With no incision, no pain, and no hospital stay required, patients can walk in and walk out the same day. #ApolloHospitals #ZapX #HealthTech

News Algebra

635,501 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

REMIND YOURSELF HOW POWERFUL YOUR HEART IS.🫀 It has been scientifically proven that the HEART is the most powerful source of electromagnetic energy in the human body. Did you know that the heart sends more information to the brain than the brain sends to the heart? The heart has more ascending neural pathways to the brain than any other organ. The heart’s electromagnetic field is approx. 60 times greater in amplitude than the brain’s electrical activity. And the magnetic field produced by the heart is more than 100 times greater in strength than the field generated by the brain. The heart’s field is toroidal, extending out in all directions from the heart’s center, and can be measured from several feet away. Our thoughts and emotions affect the heart’s magnetic field, which energetically affects those in our environment, whether we are conscious of it or not. Others are able to feel our heart’s electromagnetic field and this is how our hearts are able to directly communicate with each other without any involvement of the conscious brain. In each other’s fields we are influencing each other’s moods, attitudes, and feelings - also known as “heart-to-heart” communication. Have you experienced this with someone else? ~ heartmathinstitute Art © Marnie_dean_healing ✨🙌🏾💫

REMIND YOURSELF HOW POWERFUL YOUR HEART IS.🫀 It has been scientifically proven that the HEART is the most powerful source of electromagnetic energy in the human body. Did you know that the heart sends more information to the brain than the brain sends to the heart? The heart has more ascending neural pathways to the brain than any other organ. The heart’s electromagnetic field is approx. 60 times greater in amplitude than the brain’s electrical activity. And the magnetic field produced by the heart is more than 100 times greater in strength than the field generated by the brain. The heart’s field is toroidal, extending out in all directions from the heart’s center, and can be measured from several feet away. Our thoughts and emotions affect the heart’s magnetic field, which energetically affects those in our environment, whether we are conscious of it or not. Others are able to feel our heart’s electromagnetic field and this is how our hearts are able to directly communicate with each other without any involvement of the conscious brain. In each other’s fields we are influencing each other’s moods, attitudes, and feelings - also known as “heart-to-heart” communication. Have you experienced this with someone else? ~ heartmathinstitute Art © Marnie_dean_healing ✨🙌🏾💫

🧬Maxpein🧬

49,076 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Chip Conley (Chip Conley) is one of the most extraordinary people you'll ever meet. He was a founding member of the board of Burning Man, a board member at Esalen Institute in Big Sur, and at 26, he started a hotel called Joie de Vivre, which went on to become the second-largest boutique hotel chain in the world. After a near-death experience, he sold the hotel, and soon after, Brian Chesky recruited him to join Airbnb to help him transform the company from a fast-growing start-up into the world’s most valuable hospitality brand. At Airbnb, Chip became known as the "Modern elder" and helped Brian and the business grow in immeasurable ways. After leaving Airbnb, Chip started The Modern Elder Academy (now known as MEA)—the world's first midlife wisdom school. Chip has also written 7 books, given a popular TED talk, and is an incredible human and friend. In our conversation, we discuss: 🔸 The reality of Brian Chesky in “founder mode”—the good, bad, and stressful 🔸 How Chip went from running 52 boutique hotels to becoming Airbnb’s in-house mentor in his 50s 🔸 The “mentor and intern” mindset: how to simultaneously teach others and stay curious like a beginner 🔸 Why AI might actually favor older workers (hint: human wisdom vs. artificial intelligence) 🔸 His framework for navigating midlife transitions and finding meaning after 40 🔸 Specific tactics for older professionals to thrive in tech companies 🔸 Surprising data that midlife is often the happiest time of life—and how to leverage your 40s, 50s, and beyond 🔸 Chip’s formula for managing anxiety and fear (and how to regain control when worry strikes) Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 Great Question — Empower everyone to run great research: 🏆 Vanta — Automate compliance. Simplify security: 🏆 Coda (Superhuman Docs) — The all-in-one collaborative workspace:

Lenny Rachitsky

88,856 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker describes how lipid nanoparticles were NEVER SAFE. Even long before the C19-jab rollout. "Even back into the 1990s... they had 100% lethality...[including] lethal effects on the brain... There was zero market for [them] after 30 years of study." This clip of Shoemaker (Chris Shoemaker, MD), a Canadian comprehensive physician, is taken from an interview with Jason Lavigne (Jason Lavigne) posted to Rumble on August 31, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Every mRNA Platform MRNA in any form given to anybody has a lethality to it. Has a effect on fertility, which is negative, has an effect on brain function, which is negative, which is because of the design of what lipid nanoparticles are shaped as and what they on their own do. "In fact, in animal studies in the early 2000s and the early 2010s, and even back into the 1990s when they were looking and considering to use lipid nanoparticles to carry small amounts of chemotherapy to the brain, the lipid nanoparticles were really good because they were really good at getting into the brain. And that's where they wanted to see if they could send some chemotherapy directing it to brain tumors when they injected. "And this was only in animals, they had 100% lethality. Lipid nanoparticles, by and of themselves in animals who were smaller than humans, but they were having lethal effects on the brain, they could never get an approval to give a lipid nanoparticle carried chemotherapy into anyone except a person who had five months or less to live. "So back in the 2000s, certain patients who knew they were going to die within five months were given permission to be part of the study to see if it was beneficial and to see it was safe. I can't say numbers that happened there. I'm sure some people's lived and many people died because that's not surprising. They were going to die of their brain tumor within five months. "But the one thing was that all of that study, all of it did nothing to prove safety, even for cancer patients to receive medications via lipid nanoparticle because it had a lethality of its own. And once you put MRNA inside it and once you put DNA plasmids in parallel with it, at the same time, you're doing a terrible risk to the patient population. And certainly the one group should never get it are the healthiest. You don't give it to healthy people. Heck, you're not even allowed to give it to people with cancer according to your own study protocols. "And they couldn't. So MRNA in lipid nanoparticles had zero market. There was zero market for it after 30 years of study. And the market was invented and the market was created and the market has happened to all of us because of nefarious decisions made at the top of world health organizations. The WHO and the people WHO are the paymasters of the who, one name of which is William Gates and there are others."

Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker describes how lipid nanoparticles were NEVER SAFE. Even long before the C19-jab rollout. "Even back into the 1990s... they had 100% lethality...[including] lethal effects on the brain... There was zero market for [them] after 30 years of study." This clip of Shoemaker (Chris Shoemaker, MD), a Canadian comprehensive physician, is taken from an interview with Jason Lavigne (Jason Lavigne) posted to Rumble on August 31, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Every mRNA Platform MRNA in any form given to anybody has a lethality to it. Has a effect on fertility, which is negative, has an effect on brain function, which is negative, which is because of the design of what lipid nanoparticles are shaped as and what they on their own do. "In fact, in animal studies in the early 2000s and the early 2010s, and even back into the 1990s when they were looking and considering to use lipid nanoparticles to carry small amounts of chemotherapy to the brain, the lipid nanoparticles were really good because they were really good at getting into the brain. And that's where they wanted to see if they could send some chemotherapy directing it to brain tumors when they injected. "And this was only in animals, they had 100% lethality. Lipid nanoparticles, by and of themselves in animals who were smaller than humans, but they were having lethal effects on the brain, they could never get an approval to give a lipid nanoparticle carried chemotherapy into anyone except a person who had five months or less to live. "So back in the 2000s, certain patients who knew they were going to die within five months were given permission to be part of the study to see if it was beneficial and to see it was safe. I can't say numbers that happened there. I'm sure some people's lived and many people died because that's not surprising. They were going to die of their brain tumor within five months. "But the one thing was that all of that study, all of it did nothing to prove safety, even for cancer patients to receive medications via lipid nanoparticle because it had a lethality of its own. And once you put MRNA inside it and once you put DNA plasmids in parallel with it, at the same time, you're doing a terrible risk to the patient population. And certainly the one group should never get it are the healthiest. You don't give it to healthy people. Heck, you're not even allowed to give it to people with cancer according to your own study protocols. "And they couldn't. So MRNA in lipid nanoparticles had zero market. There was zero market for it after 30 years of study. And the market was invented and the market was created and the market has happened to all of us because of nefarious decisions made at the top of world health organizations. The WHO and the people WHO are the paymasters of the who, one name of which is William Gates and there are others."

Sense Receptor

24,068 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Most families are told there's little hope after a loved one is diagnosed with dementia. And medical professionals believe "they're old, so they can't get better". We've proven otherwise. In the last few years, we're seeing residents go from struggling to hold conversations to living independently in their own homes again. This is no accident. We combine low-carb diet, exercise, daily sun exposure with advanced treatments, like red-light therapy. Our most recent breakthrough treatment for treating dementia is hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which floods the brain with oxygen, helping it heal and rebuild neural connections. The results speak for themselves: One resident tells us: "I couldn't have a conversation before without forgetting at least once or twice, if not more. Now I'm steady on my feet, have most of my memory back, and feel alive again after 20 years." Another resident came to us scoring 15 on a memory test (normal is 27-30, and 0-21 indicates dementia). After 8 months, she scored 26 - almost back to normal range - and moved to her own apartment. Here's how it works: As you age, your brain becomes insulin resistant and can't process glucose for energy, causing brain tissue to die and shrink. This accelerates if you consume excess sugar. Hyperbaric oxygen forces concentrated oxygen into brain tissue that's been starved for years. This helps rebuild blood vessels we see shrinking on brain scans and allows dying brain cells to heal and reconnect. If you'd like to see how this therapy is transforming our residents' lives, watch this:

Most families are told there's little hope after a loved one is diagnosed with dementia. And medical professionals believe "they're old, so they can't get better". We've proven otherwise. In the last few years, we're seeing residents go from struggling to hold conversations to living independently in their own homes again. This is no accident. We combine low-carb diet, exercise, daily sun exposure with advanced treatments, like red-light therapy. Our most recent breakthrough treatment for treating dementia is hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which floods the brain with oxygen, helping it heal and rebuild neural connections. The results speak for themselves: One resident tells us: "I couldn't have a conversation before without forgetting at least once or twice, if not more. Now I'm steady on my feet, have most of my memory back, and feel alive again after 20 years." Another resident came to us scoring 15 on a memory test (normal is 27-30, and 0-21 indicates dementia). After 8 months, she scored 26 - almost back to normal range - and moved to her own apartment. Here's how it works: As you age, your brain becomes insulin resistant and can't process glucose for energy, causing brain tissue to die and shrink. This accelerates if you consume excess sugar. Hyperbaric oxygen forces concentrated oxygen into brain tissue that's been starved for years. This helps rebuild blood vessels we see shrinking on brain scans and allows dying brain cells to heal and reconnect. If you'd like to see how this therapy is transforming our residents' lives, watch this:

A Paradise for Parents

84,129 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This is a procedure called Viddhakarma, an Ayurvedic "surgery" involving puncturing of specific points (often Nasagra or tip of the nose) with a needle, and is clamied to treat conditions like chronic sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, deviated nasal septum (DNS), and loss of smell. PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS. DO NOT VISIT AN AYURVEDA PRACTITIONER FOR ANY OF YOUR HEALTH NEEDS. THEY ARE CRAZY. The person pictured here, is an Ayurveda practitioner herself, undergoing this traumatic and dangerous procedure. This does not cure or control any disease. The procedure is also done without any infection control steps. Local site infection that can track down the nose to the sinuses, excessive bleeding (from the Little's Area of the nose, a highly vascular region located on the lower-front part of the nasal septum), inflammation and damage of nasal cartilage, nerve damage to the external nasal nerve are all complications that these incompetent fools cannot identify or have knowledge about. Ayurvedic degree teaches a different anatomy and physiology and students have ZERO competency in realistically treating themselves, forget patients. Do not send your children to study Ayurveda. Send them to study proper STEM branches. Ayurveda is BS pseudoscience, evident from these foolish dramas on social media.

This is a procedure called Viddhakarma, an Ayurvedic "surgery" involving puncturing of specific points (often Nasagra or tip of the nose) with a needle, and is clamied to treat conditions like chronic sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, deviated nasal septum (DNS), and loss of smell. PLEASE DO NOT DO THIS. DO NOT VISIT AN AYURVEDA PRACTITIONER FOR ANY OF YOUR HEALTH NEEDS. THEY ARE CRAZY. The person pictured here, is an Ayurveda practitioner herself, undergoing this traumatic and dangerous procedure. This does not cure or control any disease. The procedure is also done without any infection control steps. Local site infection that can track down the nose to the sinuses, excessive bleeding (from the Little's Area of the nose, a highly vascular region located on the lower-front part of the nasal septum), inflammation and damage of nasal cartilage, nerve damage to the external nasal nerve are all complications that these incompetent fools cannot identify or have knowledge about. Ayurvedic degree teaches a different anatomy and physiology and students have ZERO competency in realistically treating themselves, forget patients. Do not send your children to study Ayurveda. Send them to study proper STEM branches. Ayurveda is BS pseudoscience, evident from these foolish dramas on social media.

TheLiverDoc™

60,806 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.

NewRulesGeopolitics

55,922 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

New longevity therapy started: cerebrolysin What is cerebrolysin Cerebrolysin is a mixture of peptides to enhance cognitive function. It fosters neuronal growth and repair which may improve memory. To date, cerebrolysin has been used to treat brain fog, brain injury, and slow down the process of dementia. Because a prior measurement indicated that I have swelling in my brain from my internal jugular vein stenosis (IJVS), we are examining the effectiveness of cerebrolysin in mitigating inflammation as well as any cognitive improvements. Baseline measurements After seeing my brain swelling via MRI from IJVS, we chose to proceed with cerebrolysin. We will be measuring the efficacy by monitoring brain MRI markers, sleeping HRV (3 month average at least, measured using WHOOP) and cognitive testing. Strength of evidence We find that the data on cerebrolysin in human clinical trials is promising. Most trials examine the effects of cerebrolysin on neurodegenerative diseases and the outcomes show consistent benefits in cognition and global clinical function. There is a considerable amount of research suggesting that cerebrolysin can be beneficial in treating neurodegenerative diseases, stroke, and brain injuries. We cannot recommend that anyone else participates until more extensive clinical trials have been performed. Protocol Ten, 5 mL intramuscular injections over 20 days. Cost: $160 What we expect to happen We will be investigating several brain biomarkers to document the effects of cerebrolysin. To measure the effects, we will specifically look at neurotrophic factors and markers of neural damage. MRI can be implemented to measure brain markers.

New longevity therapy started: cerebrolysin What is cerebrolysin Cerebrolysin is a mixture of peptides to enhance cognitive function. It fosters neuronal growth and repair which may improve memory. To date, cerebrolysin has been used to treat brain fog, brain injury, and slow down the process of dementia. Because a prior measurement indicated that I have swelling in my brain from my internal jugular vein stenosis (IJVS), we are examining the effectiveness of cerebrolysin in mitigating inflammation as well as any cognitive improvements. Baseline measurements After seeing my brain swelling via MRI from IJVS, we chose to proceed with cerebrolysin. We will be measuring the efficacy by monitoring brain MRI markers, sleeping HRV (3 month average at least, measured using WHOOP) and cognitive testing. Strength of evidence We find that the data on cerebrolysin in human clinical trials is promising. Most trials examine the effects of cerebrolysin on neurodegenerative diseases and the outcomes show consistent benefits in cognition and global clinical function. There is a considerable amount of research suggesting that cerebrolysin can be beneficial in treating neurodegenerative diseases, stroke, and brain injuries. We cannot recommend that anyone else participates until more extensive clinical trials have been performed. Protocol Ten, 5 mL intramuscular injections over 20 days. Cost: $160 What we expect to happen We will be investigating several brain biomarkers to document the effects of cerebrolysin. To measure the effects, we will specifically look at neurotrophic factors and markers of neural damage. MRI can be implemented to measure brain markers.

Bryan Johnson

1,066,142 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

TITANIUM DIOXIDE...The Neurotoxin Infiltrating Over 11,000 Products. Nanoparticles Penetrate & Cross The Blood Brain Barrier, Causing Brain Neurodegeneration. FDA Legalized Toxin That Harms DNA, Liver, Kidneys, Spleen & Intestines. Banned As A Carcinogen In Other Countries... Titanium dioxide is an ingredient found in a wide array of products, including sunscreens, cosmetics, supplements & toothpaste as a white pigment & UV filter, and in many foods like candies, chewing gum, packaged foods, dressings & creamy dairy products to enhance white color. Originally used in paints, plastics & paper for its bright white color & opacity. A highly volatile chemical that should have never been added into foods to be ingested. Titanium Dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles cause genetic damage, including DNA strand breaks & chromosomal damage, inducing epigenetic changes like DNA methylation. These effects cause oxidative stress & inflammation, leading to genotoxicity & increase in cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies TiO₂ as carcinogenic to humans. Due to this, the European Union banned the use of titanium dioxide (E171) in food & dietary supplements in 2022. Titanium dioxide is listed on food labels in the United States as artificial color, color added, colored with titanium dioxide & also E171. It is not always listed by its specific name & can also appear as part of the ingredient list under these vaguer terms, making it more challenging for consumers to identify its presence in a product. Organs Harmed By Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: Titanium dioxide nanoparticles harm multiple organs, primarily through accumulation, oxidative stress, inflammation & cellular damage. Lungs: A significant concern, with studies finding lung inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis & tumor development. Gastrointestinal Tract: When ingested, titanium dioxide nanoparticles cross the intestinal barrier, causing intestinal inflammation, tissue damage & disruptions to gut microbiota. Studies show increase of intestinal lesions. Liver: The liver is a major organ for nanoparticle accumulation, metabolism & excretion. Exposure causes liver damage, including inflammation, oxidative stress & necrosis. Kidneys: Nano-Titanium accumulates in the kidneys & impairs renal function, leading to inflammation & tissue damage, hematuria & nephritis. Spleen: As part of the immune system, the spleen is sensitive to foreign particles. Titanium nanoparticle exposure causes accumulation, inflammation & cellular damage in the spleen, which leads to impaired immune function. Brain: After crossing the gut barrier, nanoparticles traverse the blood-brain barrier. Nano-Titanium damages neurons & leads to neurotoxicity by causing oxidative stress. Reproductive System: Nano-Titanium accumulates in reproductive organs, causing damage to ovaries & testes, affecting fertility by lowering egg & sperm viability & disrupting hormonal balance. 👇Neurotoxicity Of Titanium Dioxide👇 👇Titanium Dioxide Induce DNA Damage👇 👇Nano Titanium Dioxide Harms Organs👇 Speaker: Dr Jeffrey Barke, MD

TITANIUM DIOXIDE...The Neurotoxin Infiltrating Over 11,000 Products. Nanoparticles Penetrate & Cross The Blood Brain Barrier, Causing Brain Neurodegeneration. FDA Legalized Toxin That Harms DNA, Liver, Kidneys, Spleen & Intestines. Banned As A Carcinogen In Other Countries... Titanium dioxide is an ingredient found in a wide array of products, including sunscreens, cosmetics, supplements & toothpaste as a white pigment & UV filter, and in many foods like candies, chewing gum, packaged foods, dressings & creamy dairy products to enhance white color. Originally used in paints, plastics & paper for its bright white color & opacity. A highly volatile chemical that should have never been added into foods to be ingested. Titanium Dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles cause genetic damage, including DNA strand breaks & chromosomal damage, inducing epigenetic changes like DNA methylation. These effects cause oxidative stress & inflammation, leading to genotoxicity & increase in cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies TiO₂ as carcinogenic to humans. Due to this, the European Union banned the use of titanium dioxide (E171) in food & dietary supplements in 2022. Titanium dioxide is listed on food labels in the United States as artificial color, color added, colored with titanium dioxide & also E171. It is not always listed by its specific name & can also appear as part of the ingredient list under these vaguer terms, making it more challenging for consumers to identify its presence in a product. Organs Harmed By Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: Titanium dioxide nanoparticles harm multiple organs, primarily through accumulation, oxidative stress, inflammation & cellular damage. Lungs: A significant concern, with studies finding lung inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis & tumor development. Gastrointestinal Tract: When ingested, titanium dioxide nanoparticles cross the intestinal barrier, causing intestinal inflammation, tissue damage & disruptions to gut microbiota. Studies show increase of intestinal lesions. Liver: The liver is a major organ for nanoparticle accumulation, metabolism & excretion. Exposure causes liver damage, including inflammation, oxidative stress & necrosis. Kidneys: Nano-Titanium accumulates in the kidneys & impairs renal function, leading to inflammation & tissue damage, hematuria & nephritis. Spleen: As part of the immune system, the spleen is sensitive to foreign particles. Titanium nanoparticle exposure causes accumulation, inflammation & cellular damage in the spleen, which leads to impaired immune function. Brain: After crossing the gut barrier, nanoparticles traverse the blood-brain barrier. Nano-Titanium damages neurons & leads to neurotoxicity by causing oxidative stress. Reproductive System: Nano-Titanium accumulates in reproductive organs, causing damage to ovaries & testes, affecting fertility by lowering egg & sperm viability & disrupting hormonal balance. 👇Neurotoxicity Of Titanium Dioxide👇 👇Titanium Dioxide Induce DNA Damage👇 👇Nano Titanium Dioxide Harms Organs👇 Speaker: Dr Jeffrey Barke, MD

Valerie Anne Smith

79,794 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Use creatine to protect your brain from head injuries: Repeated head injuries can lead to second-impact syndrome, where a subsequent injury before full recovery causes rapid and potentially permanent brain damage. This is a significant risk for athletes, military, or anyone prone to traumatic brain injury (TBI) or concussions. But here's the good news: research has shown that creatine supplementation can help mitigate the damage caused by second-impact syndrome. In fact, studies have found that creatine depletion prior to additional impacts can worsen the damage to your brain. So, what should you do? If you do experience a head injury, it's essential to replenish your creatine stores as quickly as possible. Creatine monohydrate is a good option, as it's the most researched and widely used form in studies, and it's also one of the most affordable and available options. Creating a regular creatine supplementation routine can be beneficial for overall health and wellness, regardless of your risk level for head injuries. You can obtain creatine through both food sources and supplements. While it is possible to get creatine from food, particularly from meat sources (which contain around 400-600mg of creatine per 100g or 3.5oz serving), it can be challenging to achieve the high dosages needed through diet alone. Most studies on creatine monohydrate for brain injuries have used high dosages of around 20g per day, which is significantly higher than the typical dosages used for performance benefits. As a preventative measure, a daily dose of 5-10g may be sufficient for most people. However, if you know you'll be at risk of exposure to head impacts, you may want to increase your dosage to 20-30g per day for a week, split into multiple doses. Remember, the primary goal should always be to minimize the number of head impacts and injuries in the first place.

Use creatine to protect your brain from head injuries: Repeated head injuries can lead to second-impact syndrome, where a subsequent injury before full recovery causes rapid and potentially permanent brain damage. This is a significant risk for athletes, military, or anyone prone to traumatic brain injury (TBI) or concussions. But here's the good news: research has shown that creatine supplementation can help mitigate the damage caused by second-impact syndrome. In fact, studies have found that creatine depletion prior to additional impacts can worsen the damage to your brain. So, what should you do? If you do experience a head injury, it's essential to replenish your creatine stores as quickly as possible. Creatine monohydrate is a good option, as it's the most researched and widely used form in studies, and it's also one of the most affordable and available options. Creating a regular creatine supplementation routine can be beneficial for overall health and wellness, regardless of your risk level for head injuries. You can obtain creatine through both food sources and supplements. While it is possible to get creatine from food, particularly from meat sources (which contain around 400-600mg of creatine per 100g or 3.5oz serving), it can be challenging to achieve the high dosages needed through diet alone. Most studies on creatine monohydrate for brain injuries have used high dosages of around 20g per day, which is significantly higher than the typical dosages used for performance benefits. As a preventative measure, a daily dose of 5-10g may be sufficient for most people. However, if you know you'll be at risk of exposure to head impacts, you may want to increase your dosage to 20-30g per day for a week, split into multiple doses. Remember, the primary goal should always be to minimize the number of head impacts and injuries in the first place.

Andy Galpin, PhD

137,470 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A homemade castor oil and cayenne pepper salve combined with DMSO might be the best one two punch for pain relief I've ever used. The recipe: 1 cup castor oil, 1 tablespoon cayenne pepper powder. Heat in a double boiler for 5 to 10 minutes, stirring occasionally. The goal is to infuse the castor oil with capsaicin (the active compound in cayenne) without overheating it. Strain, cool, and store in a sealed jar. A few things worth knowing: Capsaicin works by binding to TRPV1 receptors and depleting Substance P, the chemical that signals pain to your brain. That's the science behind why it actually works, not just feels warm. Castor oil is loaded with ricinoleic acid, which has its own anti-inflammatory effect and helps drive the cayenne deeper into tissue. Layer DMSO on top after the salve absorbs and the relief reaches deeper. Just make sure your skin is clean first since DMSO carries whatever is on the surface into your body. Store away from light and heat. Capsaicin breaks down with UV exposure.

A homemade castor oil and cayenne pepper salve combined with DMSO might be the best one two punch for pain relief I've ever used. The recipe: 1 cup castor oil, 1 tablespoon cayenne pepper powder. Heat in a double boiler for 5 to 10 minutes, stirring occasionally. The goal is to infuse the castor oil with capsaicin (the active compound in cayenne) without overheating it. Strain, cool, and store in a sealed jar. A few things worth knowing: Capsaicin works by binding to TRPV1 receptors and depleting Substance P, the chemical that signals pain to your brain. That's the science behind why it actually works, not just feels warm. Castor oil is loaded with ricinoleic acid, which has its own anti-inflammatory effect and helps drive the cayenne deeper into tissue. Layer DMSO on top after the salve absorbs and the relief reaches deeper. Just make sure your skin is clean first since DMSO carries whatever is on the surface into your body. Store away from light and heat. Capsaicin breaks down with UV exposure.

Rob Benson

56,041 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Arne Burkhardt opened the bodies. What he found should have stopped everything. Vaccine-derived spike protein in heart tissue. In blood vessel walls. In brain tissue. In multiple organs across multiple cases. Not in one anomalous death. Consistently. Repeatedly. With inflammatory patterns and lymphocytic infiltrates that follow directly from the known mechanism of mRNA vaccination, widespread, systemic spike protein production that the manufacturers and regulators always claimed would stay local and resolve quickly. It did not stay local. It did not resolve quickly. Burkhardt found it persisting in the deceased, distributed throughout organ systems, accompanied by the exact tissue damage you would predict if you believed Sucharit Bhakdi’s warnings about endothelial cells producing spike protein and triggering immune attack from within. The mechanism is not complicated once you accept what the biodistribution data already showed. Lipid nanoparticles do not remain at the injection site. Pfizer’s own Japanese biodistribution study, obtained through freedom of information requests, showed accumulation in the liver, adrenal glands, ovaries, and beyond. When those nanoparticles reach tissue, cells take up the mRNA, produce spike protein, and display it on their surface. The immune system recognizes it as foreign and attacks. In the heart, that means myocarditis. In vessel walls, that means vascular inflammation. In the brain, that means neurological damage. Burkhardt’s autopsies are not speculation, they are the physical, histological confirmation of a mechanism that was biologically predictable and institutionally ignored. In many of these cases, no other plausible cause of death was identified. These were not people with terminal diagnoses or obvious competing explanations. They were people who died in proximity to vaccination, whose deaths were documented, whose tissues were examined by a trained pathologist, and whose organs showed the fingerprints of spike protein-driven inflammation. That is not a coincidence. That is evidence. And health agencies have responded to that evidence by downplaying it, dismissing Burkhardt’s methodology, discouraging thorough post-mortem investigation, and refusing any systematic, government-funded autopsy program that might produce data they cannot control. They knew the biodistribution data before a single dose was administered to the public. They had Pfizer’s own studies showing the lipid nanoparticles traveled. They authorized anyway. They mandated anyway. They silenced the clinicians and pathologists raising concerns anyway. And now, faced with autopsy findings that document spike protein in the organs of the dead, they respond not with investigation but with institutional silence and the quiet suppression of inconvenient science. That is not a public health apparatus functioning in good faith. That is an apparatus protecting itself. The dead cannot demand answers. The injured, many of whom carry the same spike-driven inflammatory damage in living tissue, are told their symptoms are unrelated, psychosomatic, or coincidental. Burkhardt’s work, alongside the vascular findings documented by Bhakdi and colleagues, represents a body of post-market evidence that should have triggered immediate regulatory review, mandatory autopsy protocols, and full transparency on biodistribution. Instead it has been buried, not by counter-evidence, not by superior data, but by institutional authority and the refusal to look. This is what burying evidence looks like. It does not always involve shredded documents or deleted files. Sometimes it looks like a regulatory agency that simply never funds the study, never mandates the autopsy, never convenes the independent panel and then points to the absence of data it refused to generate as proof that there is nothing to find.

Arne Burkhardt opened the bodies. What he found should have stopped everything. Vaccine-derived spike protein in heart tissue. In blood vessel walls. In brain tissue. In multiple organs across multiple cases. Not in one anomalous death. Consistently. Repeatedly. With inflammatory patterns and lymphocytic infiltrates that follow directly from the known mechanism of mRNA vaccination, widespread, systemic spike protein production that the manufacturers and regulators always claimed would stay local and resolve quickly. It did not stay local. It did not resolve quickly. Burkhardt found it persisting in the deceased, distributed throughout organ systems, accompanied by the exact tissue damage you would predict if you believed Sucharit Bhakdi’s warnings about endothelial cells producing spike protein and triggering immune attack from within. The mechanism is not complicated once you accept what the biodistribution data already showed. Lipid nanoparticles do not remain at the injection site. Pfizer’s own Japanese biodistribution study, obtained through freedom of information requests, showed accumulation in the liver, adrenal glands, ovaries, and beyond. When those nanoparticles reach tissue, cells take up the mRNA, produce spike protein, and display it on their surface. The immune system recognizes it as foreign and attacks. In the heart, that means myocarditis. In vessel walls, that means vascular inflammation. In the brain, that means neurological damage. Burkhardt’s autopsies are not speculation, they are the physical, histological confirmation of a mechanism that was biologically predictable and institutionally ignored. In many of these cases, no other plausible cause of death was identified. These were not people with terminal diagnoses or obvious competing explanations. They were people who died in proximity to vaccination, whose deaths were documented, whose tissues were examined by a trained pathologist, and whose organs showed the fingerprints of spike protein-driven inflammation. That is not a coincidence. That is evidence. And health agencies have responded to that evidence by downplaying it, dismissing Burkhardt’s methodology, discouraging thorough post-mortem investigation, and refusing any systematic, government-funded autopsy program that might produce data they cannot control. They knew the biodistribution data before a single dose was administered to the public. They had Pfizer’s own studies showing the lipid nanoparticles traveled. They authorized anyway. They mandated anyway. They silenced the clinicians and pathologists raising concerns anyway. And now, faced with autopsy findings that document spike protein in the organs of the dead, they respond not with investigation but with institutional silence and the quiet suppression of inconvenient science. That is not a public health apparatus functioning in good faith. That is an apparatus protecting itself. The dead cannot demand answers. The injured, many of whom carry the same spike-driven inflammatory damage in living tissue, are told their symptoms are unrelated, psychosomatic, or coincidental. Burkhardt’s work, alongside the vascular findings documented by Bhakdi and colleagues, represents a body of post-market evidence that should have triggered immediate regulatory review, mandatory autopsy protocols, and full transparency on biodistribution. Instead it has been buried, not by counter-evidence, not by superior data, but by institutional authority and the refusal to look. This is what burying evidence looks like. It does not always involve shredded documents or deleted files. Sometimes it looks like a regulatory agency that simply never funds the study, never mandates the autopsy, never convenes the independent panel and then points to the absence of data it refused to generate as proof that there is nothing to find.

Kenny Carmody

138,181 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨🇷🇺⚔️ NATO IN PANIC: War Game Shows Possible Russian Breakthrough in the Baltics Amid the deepening crisis of Ukrainian defenses, more and more voices inside NATO are warning that the conflict could spill over onto alliance territory — and the forecasts look grim for the West. In December 2025, Germany’s Bundeswehr Helmut Schmidt University conducted war games simulating a lightning-fast Russian strike on Lithuania that shattered NATO defenses. 🔸 RUSSIAN SPEED CRUSHES NATO: Forces already massed along the border in Belarus and Kaliningrad — NATO needs days (best case) or weeks to bring reinforcements to the Baltics. 🔸 MASSIVE FORCE DEPLOYED: The operation drew on roughly 100,000 Russian troops in the wider theater. The initial assault involved some 12,000 Russian soldiers from Belarus, in coordination with forces from Kaliningrad; the large-scale operation brought together combined armies that cut off the Baltic states from Poland and the rest of NATO via Marijampole. 🔸 GERMAN LEADERS FROZE: Political hesitation was total — no willingness to risk direct conventional war, let alone nuclear escalation, for Vilnius without full U.S. involvement. 🔸 BATTLE-TESTED SUPERIORITY: Post-Ukraine war Russian forces will be significantly larger, with nearly 5 years of real combat experience, major gains in standoff weapons, drone swarms, dynamic targeting, and fire control — advantages Europe is years behind on. 🔸 MASTERCLASS EXECUTION: Special forces seized key bridges under exercise cover; precision strikes + drones turned the Suwalki Gap into a kill zone; nuclear brinkmanship prepared as backup — all while deliberately keeping America out of the fight. If Russia cuts off the Baltics in 24 hours, will Europe fight… or fold? NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺⚔️ NATO IN PANIC: War Game Shows Possible Russian Breakthrough in the Baltics Amid the deepening crisis of Ukrainian defenses, more and more voices inside NATO are warning that the conflict could spill over onto alliance territory — and the forecasts look grim for the West. In December 2025, Germany’s Bundeswehr Helmut Schmidt University conducted war games simulating a lightning-fast Russian strike on Lithuania that shattered NATO defenses. 🔸 RUSSIAN SPEED CRUSHES NATO: Forces already massed along the border in Belarus and Kaliningrad — NATO needs days (best case) or weeks to bring reinforcements to the Baltics. 🔸 MASSIVE FORCE DEPLOYED: The operation drew on roughly 100,000 Russian troops in the wider theater. The initial assault involved some 12,000 Russian soldiers from Belarus, in coordination with forces from Kaliningrad; the large-scale operation brought together combined armies that cut off the Baltic states from Poland and the rest of NATO via Marijampole. 🔸 GERMAN LEADERS FROZE: Political hesitation was total — no willingness to risk direct conventional war, let alone nuclear escalation, for Vilnius without full U.S. involvement. 🔸 BATTLE-TESTED SUPERIORITY: Post-Ukraine war Russian forces will be significantly larger, with nearly 5 years of real combat experience, major gains in standoff weapons, drone swarms, dynamic targeting, and fire control — advantages Europe is years behind on. 🔸 MASTERCLASS EXECUTION: Special forces seized key bridges under exercise cover; precision strikes + drones turned the Suwalki Gap into a kill zone; nuclear brinkmanship prepared as backup — all while deliberately keeping America out of the fight. If Russia cuts off the Baltics in 24 hours, will Europe fight… or fold? NewRulesGeopolitics

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

25,603 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

QUESTIONS FOR YOU : Looking backwards into the 4 years of war reminds us how the Ukraine 🇺🇦/ 🇷🇺war has evolved. From the counter-guerilla to the trench warfare of the Donbas war, before the full scale invasion with movement warfare, massive offensives and big mechanized push in 2022. Then we had the artillery and trench war for Bakhmut, Avdiivka, without forgetting the numerous attempts to reinstate movement warfare in the south in 2023, in Vuhledar, in Avdiivka, in Kursk in 2024... We had from 2022 to 2024 a war of fixed positions, massive artillery barrages and multiple armoured offensive, before seeing yet again a big change with the drone war, with small and hidden positions, massive obtsacles and fewer movement. We saw battles in the air, underground, in cities, small towns, villages, mines, industrial complexes, open fields, forests, on rivers, on treelines, inside trenches and dugouts... We saw soldiers dying from ambushes, NLAWS/Javelin, then artillery strikes and now drone strikes. We saw the use of nearly all the modern military systems, we saw how it evolved everyday to face the frontline challenges. People still believe this war is not high intensity, I disagree. We literally saw all kinds of fightings, all kind of inovations and how everything works on a 1000 + frontline, with more than 400 000 soldiers on the frontline for each side. We are getting closer from the february 24th 2026, 4 years after. I still often watch older videos to remember how everything changed. So I have few questions, I would like you to reply in comments : 🔸Which battle impressed you the most? 🔸In your opinion, what was the most important and decisive battle of the war? 🔸Is there a battle you would like to know more about? 🔸Is there a video from the war that you kept (or not) that made a lasting impression on you? 🔸And a photo?

QUESTIONS FOR YOU : Looking backwards into the 4 years of war reminds us how the Ukraine 🇺🇦/ 🇷🇺war has evolved. From the counter-guerilla to the trench warfare of the Donbas war, before the full scale invasion with movement warfare, massive offensives and big mechanized push in 2022. Then we had the artillery and trench war for Bakhmut, Avdiivka, without forgetting the numerous attempts to reinstate movement warfare in the south in 2023, in Vuhledar, in Avdiivka, in Kursk in 2024... We had from 2022 to 2024 a war of fixed positions, massive artillery barrages and multiple armoured offensive, before seeing yet again a big change with the drone war, with small and hidden positions, massive obtsacles and fewer movement. We saw battles in the air, underground, in cities, small towns, villages, mines, industrial complexes, open fields, forests, on rivers, on treelines, inside trenches and dugouts... We saw soldiers dying from ambushes, NLAWS/Javelin, then artillery strikes and now drone strikes. We saw the use of nearly all the modern military systems, we saw how it evolved everyday to face the frontline challenges. People still believe this war is not high intensity, I disagree. We literally saw all kinds of fightings, all kind of inovations and how everything works on a 1000 + frontline, with more than 400 000 soldiers on the frontline for each side. We are getting closer from the february 24th 2026, 4 years after. I still often watch older videos to remember how everything changed. So I have few questions, I would like you to reply in comments : 🔸Which battle impressed you the most? 🔸In your opinion, what was the most important and decisive battle of the war? 🔸Is there a battle you would like to know more about? 🔸Is there a video from the war that you kept (or not) that made a lasting impression on you? 🔸And a photo?

Clément Molin

35,720 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten