Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sam Presti says the Thunder could simply exercise team options and bring back the entire core for next season. "That's certainly possible." Presti cautioned that roster decisions may take longer than usual this summer as Oklahoma City evaluates every available path, including contract options, draft picks, and long-term roster construction.

23,645 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Lots to unpack as Jake Fischer discusses the Domantas Sabonis/Toronto Raptors trade talks this season: -The Kings thought that Toronto and Washington were the two landing spots for Sabonis. -The Wizards were shopping around Khris Middleton’s $33M-expiring contract, and some draft capital to see what sort of center they could land (ultimately ended up acquiring AD). -Wizards inquired about players like Sabonis, KAT, potentially Zion as well. -“The second the Wizards went and got Anthony Davis, that kind of took a lot of Sacramento’s leverage with Toronto, trying to get first round draft capital for Domantas Sabonis, and the Raptors were just not willing to do so.” This lead to some friction between the two teams regarding negotiating draft capital. -“The only contract of significant consequence that Toronto was offering, that Sacramento was willing to take back, was RJ Barrett.” Kings GM (and former Knicks executive) Scott Perry was with the Knicks when they drafted RJ. -Jakob Pöltl’s contract was considered “onerous” around the league. -Jake says he has confirmed with various sources that Memphis was open to taking on Jakob Pöltl’s contract. -The Raptors had conversations on Daniel Gafford as well. Mavs were looking to land first round draft capital -Toronto simply just wasn’t going to give up any first round picks for any big men during this season’s trade deadline -The Kings will have another opportunity this summer to move on from Domantas Sabonis, if they want to. (Via. Bleacher Report)

Omer Osman

63,253 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

If the Wolves were able to have a cap space team (maybe Brooklyn or Chicago) absorb Julius Randle's contract next season ($33M), that would open up three interesting roster building tools I want to highlight. I think this is relevant because the Wolves front office has a history of kind of stringing together transactions -- even over the course of multiple transaction windows (offseason and trade deadline). The Randle trade would be Randle + draft compensation for say Brooklyn to absorb the contract - maybe: Randle + No. 28 for a future 2nd (Adjust compensation as you see fit. Not the point of this exercise. Obviously if this would cost a bunch, they wouldn't do it. Or maybe they'd have to move to using Gobert's salary as the salary moved into another team's cap space.) Shedding Randle's salary would drop the Wolves well below the *1st* apron (about $52M). And while beneath the 1st apron, the Wolves would open up the ability to three additional roster building tools for spending that $52M... (If Ayo Dosunmu were to sign for $17M, that would be $35M in room below the 1st apron. And need to make sure to get the roster to 14 players.) 1. The non-taxpayer midlevel exception ($15M) - The "big MLE" is a $15M gift card for teams to spend above the salary cap but below the 1st apron. So if the Wolves were to use this, they would be hard-capped at the 1st apron ($13M below 2nd apron). If a team is over the 1st apron, they only have access to the taxpayer or "mini MLE", which is $6M next season - Could go out and sign a free agent for up to $15M in starting salary - Could also use this $15M as a trade exception and trade for a player who makes up to $15M 2. The trade exception generated in the Mike Conley salary dump trade to Chicago ($10.77M) - A trade exception allows a team to trade for a player without sending back matching salary for up to the amount of the trade exception - So with access to this trade exception, the Wolves could trade for a player making up to $10.77M - Using a trade exception also hard caps a team at the 1st apron ($13M below 2nd apron) 3. Making a Randle trade to a team who absorbs his contract into cap space would also create another trade exception (up to $33M) - The size of that trade exception would be Randle's $33M, minus whatever the Wolves took back in the trade - Might not need that for spending this summer. But doesn't expire for 365 days. The downside of working below the 1st apron as opposed to the 2nd apron is it restricts overall spending power by $13M -- because that's the gap between the two aprons.

Dane Moore

509,700 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Wolves salary dumped Mike Conley's $10.8M contract at the trade deadline. These were the functional salary cap-related values to the Wolves in making that trade... - The trade got them below the 1st apron, which gave them the ability to take back more money in a subsequent trade (because you can't be over the 1st apron and take back more money than you send out in a trade). Technically, they took back more money in the Ayo Dosunmu trade, because it included Julian Phillips and his contract. But if you remember, the Conley trade happened two days before the deadline. They made the move in advance to open up the possibility of taking back more money in a trade for an expensive star (potentially Giannis). That was the theoretical value there, much more than it was about the value of bringing in Phillips. - They saved a lot of money on the luxury tax bill after paying nearly $100M in luxury tax for being above the 2nd apron the season before. - They created a $10.8M trade exception that they can use to absorb up to $10.8M in salary without sending money back. But using a trade exception hard caps you at the 1st apron and only lasts for 12 months. - Got off Rob Dillingham's contract that is set to pay him $6.9M this coming season and $8.8M the following season. This creates some space beneath the aprons that they could need if they are to re-sign Ayo Dosunmu. Also created another $6.6M trade exception when doing the Dillingham-Dosunmu trade, because the Wolves absorbed Dosunmu into the Alexander-Walker trade exception from last summer ($7.6M NAW trade exception, and Dosunmu made $7.5M). Transacting this way hard-capped the Wolves at the 1st apron, but at that point in time the deadline was about to pass, they weren't trading for Giannis or anyone else, meaning there was no cost to being hard-capped at the 1st apron for the rest of the season. (Though that could impact a draft night trade, I believe -- because that's the same calendar year.) - The 21st picks salary this season ($3.9M) is $800k higher than the 28th picks salary this coming season ($3.1M). So while that player should be more valuable, that player would also carry a bigger cap hit. What it cost them was a pick swap with Detroit in this draft -- moving them back from pick 21 to pick 28 in the 1st round. So I asked Tyler Metcalf how much value the Wolves gave up in this draft by moving back from 21 to 28.

Dane Moore

59,064 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I wanted to share an update on San Francisco’s budget and how we are working to get our fiscal house in order. When I took office, we inherited a significant structural deficit. That means the city was set up to spend more money than it brings in, year after year. Today, that gap is projected to reach $1 billion dollars over the next five years. Over the past year, we’ve taken steps to close this gap and bring long-term spending more in line with revenue. We also know that increasing sustainable revenue for our city is crucial to solving our budget problem. Since the day I became mayor, we’ve been taking steps to create the conditions for San Francisco’s economic recovery. Today, our streets are safer and cleaner, and people struggling on the streets are getting into treatment. We’re making it easier to open and operate a small business in our city. And that progress has led to results: Businesses of all sizes are coming back to San Francisco, people are shopping downtown again, and tax revenues are higher than projected. While we are making meaningful progress, we are not out of the woods. Our economic recovery is very fragile. And since last year’s budget, the city has faced new federal and state funding cuts. This means our budget gap would reach $1 billion in the coming years if we don’t act. The charter requires that, as mayor, I submit a balanced budget each June—we cannot spend more money than we bring in. And we must also address this long-term $1 billion dollar deficit. Because if we don’t act now, we will have to do twice as much in the coming years, with the choices becoming more expensive and more difficult. This year’s budget will include painful but necessary decisions. I know they will impact individuals and communities, and I take this seriously—which is why we must act now to avoid even deeper cuts later. This year's budget will continue the work we’ve been doing since last year to manage city funds responsibly and deliver the best possible services. And it will put our city on a path to a lasting economic recovery that benefits all San Franciscans.

Daniel Lurie 丹尼爾·羅偉

39,270 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I want Knicks fans to watch the Sam Presti clip about Mark Daigneault before reacting to this Mike Brown/Leon Rose rotation-sheet story. Mark Daigneault was a g league coach before becoming an NBA coach. As a G League coach, Mark was given development priorities, lineup goals, and organizational objectives. The job isn’t “win tonight at all costs.” It’s to understand the roster, build chemistry, and develop players the organization needs to evaluate. Presti praises Daigneault specifically for being willing to try different rotations so everyplayer is prepared and there’s no drop-off when injuries hit. That’s the model. This matters because Knicks fans have been conditioned by the Thibodeau era, an era where the coach functionally operated with autonomy even without a front office title. The first moves of the Thibs/Rose tenure were Derrick Rose and Taj Gibson. Veterans who knew his system were prioritized over developing Quickley, Grimes, Obi, Sims and others, almost all of whom are still in the league and on second contracts, while the vets he leaned on are out of basketball. Even in losing seasons, he favored Kemba, Burks, Rose, Taj, and Fournier. That philosophy shaped real roster outcomes: running back the COVID team, signing more vets, skipping the lottery to preserve cap space for Brunson, and ultimately losing a 2023 2nd due to tampering. Those rookie-scale deals (Jalen Williams, Duren, Walsh types) matter under the new CBA. There were moments when the FO clearly pushed back: like the end-of-season shift from Taj to Sims, but for years the organization prioritized Thibs’ “win now” approach over long-term asset value. That’s why the Knicks entered the 2022 summer without a clean star-trade package, why they eventually traded Obi for two 2nds, why Grimes was included for Bojan, Quickley/RJ for OG, and why they ultimately emptied the war chest for Bridges. They built a win-now roster tailored for Thibs. But the playoffs exposed the limits: slow pace, tight rotations, heavy workloads, and no experimentation. Even players, including Bridges, complained about minutes and the lack of trust in the bench. The team needed spacing adjustments; Thibs resisted. When Brunson got into foul trouble in Game 3, the bench saved the night, and suddenly the Knicks looked alive again. It forced the question: why weren’t these players used earlier? Exit interviews reportedly made it clear: players didn’t understand their roles. That’s why Thibs is gone. the Knicks explicitly sought a coach who fits the leaguewide direction: collaborative, experimental, rotation-flexible, and aligned with analytics and sports science. This is how OKC, Indy, Boston, and almost every modern org operates. George Karl said in 2015 that barely ten coaches had real roster power anymore. TEN years later, it’s even fewer. We’ve watched Malone, Jenkins, and Thibs lose jobs for resisting organizational alignment. So the idea that Mike Brown giving Leon Rose a rotation sheet is some shocking headline? It’s not. It’s standard. Not “front office interference.” Not “shadow coaching.” It’s communication: the same communication that players have already praised in the early Mike Brown era. The Knicks aren’t doing anything unique here; they’re finally doing what elite franchises already do. As someone who has coached: collaboration is normal even at the high school level. No head coach just sits on a throne dictating everything. Multiply that by a multi-billion-dollar NBA organization under the new CBA, and of course coaches and front offices are in constant dialogue. If anything, this report shows the Knicks are moving toward the modern model. Not away from it.

Poppa Left

120,380 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten