正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🔐 SATOSHI'S 1 MILLION BITCOIN AT RISK OF BEING STOLEN AS DEVS PUSH QUANTUM FIX Bitcoin developers have merged BIP-360 into the official BIP repository, introducing a new quantum-resistant address type called Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR) to protect the network from future quantum computing threats. An estimated 6.51 million BTC, roughly...

BSCNews's profile picture

BSCN

1,369,959 subscribers

47,186 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Bitcoin developers just proposed freezing early BTC wallets forever Bitcoin developers led by Jameson Lopp have published BIP-361, a post-quantum migration proposal. It requires holders to move their coins to quantum-resistant addresses or face permanent freezing by the network. The plan would phase out legacy ECDSA and Schnorr signatures over several years, rendering them invalid if quantum computing threats materialize. Developers argue the move is a necessary defensive measure to protect the network before sufficiently powerful quantum computers arrive.
0:17

Bitcoin developers just proposed freezing early BTC wallets forever Bitcoin developers led by Jameson Lopp have published BIP-361, a post-quantum migration proposal. It requires holders to move their coins to quantum-resistant addresses or face permanent freezing by the network. The plan would phase out legacy ECDSA and Schnorr signatures over several years, rendering them invalid if quantum computing threats materialize. Developers argue the move is a necessary defensive measure to protect the network before sufficiently powerful quantum computers arrive.

BSCN

102,873 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨BREAKING: GOOGLE WARNS 6.9M BITCOIN WILL BE VULNERABLE WHEN QUANTUM COMPUTERS BECOME POWERFUL ENOUGH A new Google Quantum AI whitepaper has identified approximately 6.9 million Bitcoin $BTC vulnerable to future quantum at-rest attacks. Around 1.7 million BTC sits in old Pay-to-Public-Key scripts, with public keys permanently exposed on the blockchain. This includes coins widely believed to belong to Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto. No quantum computer powerful enough to exploit this exists today. But the paper warns that when one does, these dormant assets require no transaction to be broadcast — a future attacker could simply derive the private key silently from public data. The research team revealed that a superconducting quantum computer could derive a Bitcoin private key in approximately 9 minutes — just inside Bitcoin's average 10-minute block time. Google warns the coins represent a "fixed, multibillion-dollar target" if protocol changes are not made in time. The paper proposes governments consider legal frameworks for "digital salvage," treating dormant quantum-vulnerable coins similarly to unclaimed sunken treasure, to prevent them falling to rogue states or criminal actors first.
0:17

🚨BREAKING: GOOGLE WARNS 6.9M BITCOIN WILL BE VULNERABLE WHEN QUANTUM COMPUTERS BECOME POWERFUL ENOUGH A new Google Quantum AI whitepaper has identified approximately 6.9 million Bitcoin $BTC vulnerable to future quantum at-rest attacks. Around 1.7 million BTC sits in old Pay-to-Public-Key scripts, with public keys permanently exposed on the blockchain. This includes coins widely believed to belong to Bitcoin's pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto. No quantum computer powerful enough to exploit this exists today. But the paper warns that when one does, these dormant assets require no transaction to be broadcast — a future attacker could simply derive the private key silently from public data. The research team revealed that a superconducting quantum computer could derive a Bitcoin private key in approximately 9 minutes — just inside Bitcoin's average 10-minute block time. Google warns the coins represent a "fixed, multibillion-dollar target" if protocol changes are not made in time. The paper proposes governments consider legal frameworks for "digital salvage," treating dormant quantum-vulnerable coins similarly to unclaimed sunken treasure, to prevent them falling to rogue states or criminal actors first.

BSCN

72,855 次观看 • 6 个月前

Ixios Mainnet Launch Date We are thrilled to announce the official launch date of the Ixios Mainnet, a layer 1 blockchain designed to future-proof blockchain technology with quantum-resistance and blazingly fast speed. As a nod to Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin—the Ixios Mainnet will officially go live on April 5, 2025. Ixios introduces a quantum-resistant architecture, engineered with a forward-looking modular signature mechanism. This innovation addresses advances in quantum computing, ensuring security in a post-quantum world. Together, Let’s future-proof Web3.
0:12

Ixios Mainnet Launch Date We are thrilled to announce the official launch date of the Ixios Mainnet, a layer 1 blockchain designed to future-proof blockchain technology with quantum-resistance and blazingly fast speed. As a nod to Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin—the Ixios Mainnet will officially go live on April 5, 2025. Ixios introduces a quantum-resistant architecture, engineered with a forward-looking modular signature mechanism. This innovation addresses advances in quantum computing, ensuring security in a post-quantum world. Together, Let’s future-proof Web3.

Ixios

73,768 次观看 • 1 年前

‼️ALERT: ETHEREUM'S TOP 1,000 WALLETS COULD BE DRAINED IN NINE DAYS WITHOUT A QUANTUM UPGRADE Google's quantum research team warns that a future fast-clock quantum computer could compromise Ethereum's 1,000 highest-value accounts in less than nine days. Those accounts collectively hold approximately 20.5 million $ETH. Bitcoin users can avoid exposing their public keys. Ethereum users cannot. The moment an Ethereum user sends their first transaction, their public key is permanently exposed on the blockchain, according to the report. It stays exposed indefinitely. The paper identifies five distinct quantum attack vectors on Ethereum. Among the most alarming is the threat to smart contract admin keys. Those keys control over $200 billion in stablecoins and tokenised real-world assets. Ethereum's Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism also relies on quantum-vulnerable BLS signatures. A sufficiently advanced quantum attacker could use this to compromise the blockchain's finality itself. There is a silver lining. The Ethereum Foundation is already researching post-quantum alternatives. The paper suggests this gives Ethereum a potential advantage over Bitcoin in executing an orderly transition to quantum-safe cryptography.
0:15

‼️ALERT: ETHEREUM'S TOP 1,000 WALLETS COULD BE DRAINED IN NINE DAYS WITHOUT A QUANTUM UPGRADE Google's quantum research team warns that a future fast-clock quantum computer could compromise Ethereum's 1,000 highest-value accounts in less than nine days. Those accounts collectively hold approximately 20.5 million $ETH. Bitcoin users can avoid exposing their public keys. Ethereum users cannot. The moment an Ethereum user sends their first transaction, their public key is permanently exposed on the blockchain, according to the report. It stays exposed indefinitely. The paper identifies five distinct quantum attack vectors on Ethereum. Among the most alarming is the threat to smart contract admin keys. Those keys control over $200 billion in stablecoins and tokenised real-world assets. Ethereum's Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism also relies on quantum-vulnerable BLS signatures. A sufficiently advanced quantum attacker could use this to compromise the blockchain's finality itself. There is a silver lining. The Ethereum Foundation is already researching post-quantum alternatives. The paper suggests this gives Ethereum a potential advantage over Bitcoin in executing an orderly transition to quantum-safe cryptography.

BSCN

45,659 次观看 • 6 个月前

I understand the critique that $INFQ CEO Matt Kinsella doesn’t have a degree in physics, so he can’t lead this quantum computing company. But he’s proven this viewpoint wrong. He invested in $INFQ in 2018 first (then partner at the investment firm Maverick Capital), then took the company to product development and initial commercialization. He became CEO in 2024 and took the company to an IPO this year. His job is to manage company operations and commercial scale, not do R&D. According to Form S-1, $INFQ employs “over 160 physicists and engineers working within quantum technology.” All while $INFQ grew revenues organically from $11 million in 2023 to $32,5 million in 2025. Why would $INFQ not reach $40 million in 2026 revenue under Matt?
0:16

I understand the critique that $INFQ CEO Matt Kinsella doesn’t have a degree in physics, so he can’t lead this quantum computing company. But he’s proven this viewpoint wrong. He invested in $INFQ in 2018 first (then partner at the investment firm Maverick Capital), then took the company to product development and initial commercialization. He became CEO in 2024 and took the company to an IPO this year. His job is to manage company operations and commercial scale, not do R&D. According to Form S-1, $INFQ employs “over 160 physicists and engineers working within quantum technology.” All while $INFQ grew revenues organically from $11 million in 2023 to $32,5 million in 2025. Why would $INFQ not reach $40 million in 2026 revenue under Matt?

Investor Denis

12,176 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨QUANTUM🚨: A brand new quantum state just appeared that links two fields we thought were separate 🧨 Scientists at Rice University have discovered a new quantum state of matter that connects quantum criticality — where electrons fluctuate between different phases — with electronic topology, which describes organized wave-like behavior of electrons. This hybrid state could open new paths for advanced computing, sensing, and materials. Source: Rice University news release on a study published in Nature Physics (January 2026). Uniphics explains this emergence directly through spin-wave dynamics in the ξM-field. Each Gyrotron is a stable 3D gyroscope formed by three orthogonal spin quanta — every quantum a tempest of whirling energy spinning clockwise or counterclockwise in its own plane. When local energy density and spin bias allow mixed configurations (similar to the musktron and maleytron patterns), the resulting spin-wave interference naturally produces both critical fluctuations and topological order at the same time. Negentropy favors these hybrid states because they represent lower-energy, organized patterns within the field. No new particles or exotic couplings are needed; the same principles that govern particle formation, the weak and strong forces through spin alignments, and the low-acceleration gravitational surge also allow these combined quantum behaviors in real materials when conditions permit. This turns the “unexpected new quantum state” into a predicted outcome of spin-wave physics once the three pillars are allowed to select stable hybrid configurations. How might recognizing that hybrid quantum states arise from mixed spin-wave interference change the way we search for new materials or design future quantum technologies? A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything. Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia #Uniphics #QuantumStates #SpinWaves #Topology #QuantumCriticality Grok xAI
0:10

🚨QUANTUM🚨: A brand new quantum state just appeared that links two fields we thought were separate 🧨 Scientists at Rice University have discovered a new quantum state of matter that connects quantum criticality — where electrons fluctuate between different phases — with electronic topology, which describes organized wave-like behavior of electrons. This hybrid state could open new paths for advanced computing, sensing, and materials. Source: Rice University news release on a study published in Nature Physics (January 2026). Uniphics explains this emergence directly through spin-wave dynamics in the ξM-field. Each Gyrotron is a stable 3D gyroscope formed by three orthogonal spin quanta — every quantum a tempest of whirling energy spinning clockwise or counterclockwise in its own plane. When local energy density and spin bias allow mixed configurations (similar to the musktron and maleytron patterns), the resulting spin-wave interference naturally produces both critical fluctuations and topological order at the same time. Negentropy favors these hybrid states because they represent lower-energy, organized patterns within the field. No new particles or exotic couplings are needed; the same principles that govern particle formation, the weak and strong forces through spin alignments, and the low-acceleration gravitational surge also allow these combined quantum behaviors in real materials when conditions permit. This turns the “unexpected new quantum state” into a predicted outcome of spin-wave physics once the three pillars are allowed to select stable hybrid configurations. How might recognizing that hybrid quantum states arise from mixed spin-wave interference change the way we search for new materials or design future quantum technologies? A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything. Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia #Uniphics #QuantumStates #SpinWaves #Topology #QuantumCriticality Grok xAI

Paul Maley

22,669 次观看 • 4 个月前

In the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in the U.S. sits "Little Big Coil", the most powerful continuous magnetic field ever created by humans - reaching 48.7 tesla, over 1 million times stronger than Earth's magnetic field. This record-breaking magnet uses a hybrid design, combining superconducting coils with a resistive magnet to push matter into regimes never seen before. Backed by $195M from the NSF and ongoing state funding, NHMFL scientists use it to study quantum materials, extreme superconductivity, fusion-relevant physics, and exotic states of matter. Under fields this intense, atoms distort, electrons behave strangely, and materials reveal secrets that could redefine quantum technology, energy systems, and medical science.
0:14

In the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in the U.S. sits "Little Big Coil", the most powerful continuous magnetic field ever created by humans - reaching 48.7 tesla, over 1 million times stronger than Earth's magnetic field. This record-breaking magnet uses a hybrid design, combining superconducting coils with a resistive magnet to push matter into regimes never seen before. Backed by $195M from the NSF and ongoing state funding, NHMFL scientists use it to study quantum materials, extreme superconductivity, fusion-relevant physics, and exotic states of matter. Under fields this intense, atoms distort, electrons behave strangely, and materials reveal secrets that could redefine quantum technology, energy systems, and medical science.

Brian Roemmele

62,125 次观看 • 9 个月前

InterLink’s Early Vision for NIST-Standardised Post-Quantum Cryptography 🔐✨ The next five years may bring a much clearer answer to a question that has long been difficult to judge: Is a digital asset truly secure? 🤔 For InterLink, the answer may increasingly depend on one critical factor: whether it is quantum-resistant and aligned with NIST standards 🧬🔒 Why this matters now ⚠️ Two fast-moving technologies are reshaping digital security: • AI is improving the ability to discover weaknesses in systems 🤖 • Quantum computing is advancing towards the point where today’s cryptographic foundations could become vulnerable ⚛️ For InterLink, this is not just a theoretical discussion. It is a reminder that blockchain networks, wallets, and custody systems must prepare now for the post-quantum era ⏳🛡️ Why NIST is central to InterLink’s approach 📘🏛️ Many in the InterLink community already know NIST. NIST, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, plays a major role in defining and evaluating security standards, including those for post-quantum cryptography. Its work matters because it helps shape what “secure” will mean in a quantum-capable future 📊🔍 In practical terms, InterLink’s long-term security vision is closely tied to whether its cryptographic design can withstand post-quantum threats 🚀 The risk for blockchain networks and digital assets 🔎💥 Recent research and experiments from major organisations, including Google, have highlighted a growing concern: what was once considered extremely difficult, using quantum computing to threaten cryptographic systems, is no longer something that can be ignored 🧪⚠️ That does not mean current systems are broken today. It does mean that networks which fail to prepare for post-quantum threats could face serious risks later 📉 For InterLink, this is exactly why early research matters 🧠✨ If sufficiently powerful quantum computers become available, some current cryptographic methods may become vulnerable. For any network storing value, identity, NFTs, or permissions, that is a major issue 💳🖼️🧾 InterLink’s early work on post-quantum readiness 🧠🔐 InterLink Foundation has already been researching: ✅ digital signatures ✍️ ✅ cryptographic algorithms 🔣 ✅ migration mechanisms for future security upgrades 🔄 One of the most notable areas of work is the ability to generate new private keys from an existing seed phrase 🌱➡️🔑 This matters because it offers a pathway to improve security without forcing users to abandon access to their assets 🙌 Address Alias: preserving continuity during migration 🪪🔗 Another important InterLink mechanism is Address Alias. This is designed to let users: ✓ retain their existing wallet addresses 🧾 ✓ preserve associated tokens and NFTs 🖼️💰 ✓ migrate to a new cryptographic security architecture 🔐➡️🛠️ That is a practical and user-friendly design choice. Security upgrades are often hard to adopt when they break continuity. InterLink’s approach aims to solve that problem 🌉 Bringing post-quantum protection into smart contracts 🛡️📜 InterLink is also implementing SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s (FIPS 205) within IRC smart contracts. This adds another layer of protection for: • vaults 🏦 • high-value assets 💎 • long-term storage 📦 • sensitive on-chain operations ⚙️ The goal is not only to protect wallets, but also to strengthen the systems that govern custody and transaction security across the network 🧱🔒 Testing on the Taj Mahal Testnet 🧪🛰️ These experiments are currently being conducted on the InterLink Taj Mahal Testnet. According to InterLink, the experimental implementations have passed the NIST-based simulation tests carried out so far ✅📈 That is an encouraging early signal, although broader testing and real-world validation will remain important as development continues 🔍 Looking ahead to 2027 🚀🌍 InterLink’s stated goal is to fully integrate this architecture into the Open Mainnet in 2027. If achieved, that would bring InterLink closer to a future where security is defined not only by current best practice, but by resilience against quantum-era threats 🛡️⚛️ The bigger takeaway 🌍✨ The key lesson is simple: In the quantum era, security will not only mean protecting your private will mean asking whether the cryptography behind that key was built to survive the next generation of computing 🔐⏭️ For InterLink, this is a strategic direction with long-term significance 📌 Final thought 💡 Post-quantum readiness is no longer just a technical topic for specialists. For InterLink, it is becoming part of the broader conversation about long-term digital asset security 🧠🔒 NIST-aligned cryptography, practical migration paths, and user-preserving design may soon define the networks people trust most 🌟 InterLink Labs 👤 + 🌐 KV Reina | InterLink Labs InterLink Foundation #InterLink #ITLG #ITL #WeAreTheFirst10MLinkers Join me on InterLink 😁 Start mining now and use my invitation link: 💰 My code is: 111222777888 💰 Please DM me once you have used my code. 👍
0:11

InterLink’s Early Vision for NIST-Standardised Post-Quantum Cryptography 🔐✨ The next five years may bring a much clearer answer to a question that has long been difficult to judge: Is a digital asset truly secure? 🤔 For InterLink, the answer may increasingly depend on one critical factor: whether it is quantum-resistant and aligned with NIST standards 🧬🔒 Why this matters now ⚠️ Two fast-moving technologies are reshaping digital security: • AI is improving the ability to discover weaknesses in systems 🤖 • Quantum computing is advancing towards the point where today’s cryptographic foundations could become vulnerable ⚛️ For InterLink, this is not just a theoretical discussion. It is a reminder that blockchain networks, wallets, and custody systems must prepare now for the post-quantum era ⏳🛡️ Why NIST is central to InterLink’s approach 📘🏛️ Many in the InterLink community already know NIST. NIST, part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, plays a major role in defining and evaluating security standards, including those for post-quantum cryptography. Its work matters because it helps shape what “secure” will mean in a quantum-capable future 📊🔍 In practical terms, InterLink’s long-term security vision is closely tied to whether its cryptographic design can withstand post-quantum threats 🚀 The risk for blockchain networks and digital assets 🔎💥 Recent research and experiments from major organisations, including Google, have highlighted a growing concern: what was once considered extremely difficult, using quantum computing to threaten cryptographic systems, is no longer something that can be ignored 🧪⚠️ That does not mean current systems are broken today. It does mean that networks which fail to prepare for post-quantum threats could face serious risks later 📉 For InterLink, this is exactly why early research matters 🧠✨ If sufficiently powerful quantum computers become available, some current cryptographic methods may become vulnerable. For any network storing value, identity, NFTs, or permissions, that is a major issue 💳🖼️🧾 InterLink’s early work on post-quantum readiness 🧠🔐 InterLink Foundation has already been researching: ✅ digital signatures ✍️ ✅ cryptographic algorithms 🔣 ✅ migration mechanisms for future security upgrades 🔄 One of the most notable areas of work is the ability to generate new private keys from an existing seed phrase 🌱➡️🔑 This matters because it offers a pathway to improve security without forcing users to abandon access to their assets 🙌 Address Alias: preserving continuity during migration 🪪🔗 Another important InterLink mechanism is Address Alias. This is designed to let users: ✓ retain their existing wallet addresses 🧾 ✓ preserve associated tokens and NFTs 🖼️💰 ✓ migrate to a new cryptographic security architecture 🔐➡️🛠️ That is a practical and user-friendly design choice. Security upgrades are often hard to adopt when they break continuity. InterLink’s approach aims to solve that problem 🌉 Bringing post-quantum protection into smart contracts 🛡️📜 InterLink is also implementing SLH-DSA-SHA2-128s (FIPS 205) within IRC smart contracts. This adds another layer of protection for: • vaults 🏦 • high-value assets 💎 • long-term storage 📦 • sensitive on-chain operations ⚙️ The goal is not only to protect wallets, but also to strengthen the systems that govern custody and transaction security across the network 🧱🔒 Testing on the Taj Mahal Testnet 🧪🛰️ These experiments are currently being conducted on the InterLink Taj Mahal Testnet. According to InterLink, the experimental implementations have passed the NIST-based simulation tests carried out so far ✅📈 That is an encouraging early signal, although broader testing and real-world validation will remain important as development continues 🔍 Looking ahead to 2027 🚀🌍 InterLink’s stated goal is to fully integrate this architecture into the Open Mainnet in 2027. If achieved, that would bring InterLink closer to a future where security is defined not only by current best practice, but by resilience against quantum-era threats 🛡️⚛️ The bigger takeaway 🌍✨ The key lesson is simple: In the quantum era, security will not only mean protecting your private will mean asking whether the cryptography behind that key was built to survive the next generation of computing 🔐⏭️ For InterLink, this is a strategic direction with long-term significance 📌 Final thought 💡 Post-quantum readiness is no longer just a technical topic for specialists. For InterLink, it is becoming part of the broader conversation about long-term digital asset security 🧠🔒 NIST-aligned cryptography, practical migration paths, and user-preserving design may soon define the networks people trust most 🌟 InterLink Labs 👤 + 🌐 KV Reina | InterLink Labs InterLink Foundation #InterLink #ITLG #ITL #WeAreTheFirst10MLinkers Join me on InterLink 😁 Start mining now and use my invitation link: 💰 My code is: 111222777888 💰 Please DM me once you have used my code. 👍

Tekkaus® | InterLink • MOD • T2 Community Builder

22,550 次观看 • 1 个月前

The largest theft in history has already happened. The people behind it just cannot open what they stole yet. Right now, intelligence agencies and criminal groups are quietly copying the world's encrypted data, bank records, medical files, state secrets, private messages, and storing every byte untouched. They cannot read any of it. They are collecting it anyway, because they know the key is about to be invented. The strategy has a name, harvest now, decrypt later, and in 2026 it stopped being theory. Washington declared this the Year of Quantum Security in January, backed by the FBI, the NSA, and NIST. Canada ordered every federal agency to file a migration plan by April. Europe set its deadline for December. Governments do not impose operational deadlines on a someday problem. They do it when the clock is already running. Here is what moved the clock. Every password, every transfer, every secret on Earth is protected by one assumption, that a certain math problem is too hard to solve. Quantum computers solve exactly that problem. For years the machine that could do it looked decades away. Then in late 2025 Google's Willow chip cracked the hardest part of building one, and in March 2026 Google's own researchers estimated that breaking the encryption behind Bitcoin might take fewer than 500,000 qubits, down from 20 million, and could run in minutes. The day this becomes real has a name, Q-Day, and the latest estimates place it between 2030 and 2033. Now make it concrete. Roughly 6.5 million Bitcoin, about a third of every coin that will ever exist, worth close to 500 billion dollars, sit in addresses that have already exposed the very key a quantum computer needs. That includes the coins of Satoshi, the anonymous creator. On Q-Day they become, in the researchers' own word, trivially stealable. It would not look like a crash or a whale selling. It would look like half a trillion dollars of the most secure money ever built simply walking out the door. The asset designed to trust no one and no institution turns out to rest on a single unverified bet, that one math problem stays hard forever. This is what sits beneath the entire digital world. A bank balance, a Bitcoin, a classified cable, all of it is real only because of a proof you supposedly cannot forge. Quantum breaks the proof. Everything we call secure is true only until someone finally checks, and for the first time the check is visible on the horizon. You cannot know whether your data has already been copied. You cannot know the exact day the key arrives. The trust holding up the digital age is a clock counting down to a zero no one can see. The honest counter matters. No machine on Earth can break this encryption today, and serious cryptographers still argue the real threat is a decade or more away. The timeline is far from certain. Quantum-safe codes already exist, the migration has started, and Bitcoin can move its coins to safety before Q-Day if it acts in time. The danger is not that everything breaks tomorrow. It is that anything which must stay secret into the 2030s, a state secret, an identity, a private key, is being stolen today and is already on the clock. The breach is not coming. It is already here, sitting in storage, perfectly encrypted, waiting for a machine that does not exist yet to read it out loud. Research and opinion, not investment advice.
0:10

The largest theft in history has already happened. The people behind it just cannot open what they stole yet. Right now, intelligence agencies and criminal groups are quietly copying the world's encrypted data, bank records, medical files, state secrets, private messages, and storing every byte untouched. They cannot read any of it. They are collecting it anyway, because they know the key is about to be invented. The strategy has a name, harvest now, decrypt later, and in 2026 it stopped being theory. Washington declared this the Year of Quantum Security in January, backed by the FBI, the NSA, and NIST. Canada ordered every federal agency to file a migration plan by April. Europe set its deadline for December. Governments do not impose operational deadlines on a someday problem. They do it when the clock is already running. Here is what moved the clock. Every password, every transfer, every secret on Earth is protected by one assumption, that a certain math problem is too hard to solve. Quantum computers solve exactly that problem. For years the machine that could do it looked decades away. Then in late 2025 Google's Willow chip cracked the hardest part of building one, and in March 2026 Google's own researchers estimated that breaking the encryption behind Bitcoin might take fewer than 500,000 qubits, down from 20 million, and could run in minutes. The day this becomes real has a name, Q-Day, and the latest estimates place it between 2030 and 2033. Now make it concrete. Roughly 6.5 million Bitcoin, about a third of every coin that will ever exist, worth close to 500 billion dollars, sit in addresses that have already exposed the very key a quantum computer needs. That includes the coins of Satoshi, the anonymous creator. On Q-Day they become, in the researchers' own word, trivially stealable. It would not look like a crash or a whale selling. It would look like half a trillion dollars of the most secure money ever built simply walking out the door. The asset designed to trust no one and no institution turns out to rest on a single unverified bet, that one math problem stays hard forever. This is what sits beneath the entire digital world. A bank balance, a Bitcoin, a classified cable, all of it is real only because of a proof you supposedly cannot forge. Quantum breaks the proof. Everything we call secure is true only until someone finally checks, and for the first time the check is visible on the horizon. You cannot know whether your data has already been copied. You cannot know the exact day the key arrives. The trust holding up the digital age is a clock counting down to a zero no one can see. The honest counter matters. No machine on Earth can break this encryption today, and serious cryptographers still argue the real threat is a decade or more away. The timeline is far from certain. Quantum-safe codes already exist, the migration has started, and Bitcoin can move its coins to safety before Q-Day if it acts in time. The danger is not that everything breaks tomorrow. It is that anything which must stay secret into the 2030s, a state secret, an identity, a private key, is being stolen today and is already on the clock. The breach is not coming. It is already here, sitting in storage, perfectly encrypted, waiting for a machine that does not exist yet to read it out loud. Research and opinion, not investment advice.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

185,548 次观看 • 3 个月前

🔥STRATEGY WILL BE THE WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE COMPANY🔥 Strategy bought OVER 56,000 Bitcoin in April. That number is so absurd people are psychologically incapable of processing it. Post-halving miners produce roughly 13,500 BTC per month. Strategy just bought about 4.1x an entire month of new miner supply in one month. Now run the simple monster math: Today: Strategy BTC stack: 818,334 BTC Bitcoin price: $76,196 Bitcoin NAV: $62.35B Assume Strategy keeps buying 56,000 BTC per month for 5 years. That is: ASSUMING STRC GROWTH TOTALLY STOPS (LOL) ~672,000 BTC per year ~3,360,000 BTC over 5 years Their stack goes from: 818,334 BTC to 4,178,334 BTC Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% CAGR. Bitcoin goes from: $76,196 to roughly: $232,532 So the Bitcoin NAV becomes: 4,178,334 BTC × $232,532 = roughly $971.5 BILLION Almost $1 TRILLION in Bitcoin NAV. And the funniest part? This model assumes no mNAV expansion. No premium insanity. No additional acceleration. No credit flywheel getting stronger. No market panic as everyone realizes Strategy is vacuuming Bitcoin off the planet like a publicly traded monetary black hole. Just: 56,000 BTC per month. 25% Bitcoin CAGR. 5 years. That’s it. Don't think they can accumulate that much Bitcoin at that low of a CAGR? Think the Bitcoin CAGR has to go higher? Cool. That only helps Strategy buy more Bitcoin. The bear case is basically: “Sure, they are absorbing multiples of new supply, building the largest corporate Bitcoin balance sheet in history, converting fiat capital markets into Bitcoin ownership, and compounding NAV at escape velocity, but have you considered that I am emotionally upset?” MSTR is becoming the most aggressive Bitcoin accumulation machine ever built. The fiat world is still modeling it like a tech stock with a weird treasury policy. GOOD LUCK.
0:14

🔥STRATEGY WILL BE THE WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE COMPANY🔥 Strategy bought OVER 56,000 Bitcoin in April. That number is so absurd people are psychologically incapable of processing it. Post-halving miners produce roughly 13,500 BTC per month. Strategy just bought about 4.1x an entire month of new miner supply in one month. Now run the simple monster math: Today: Strategy BTC stack: 818,334 BTC Bitcoin price: $76,196 Bitcoin NAV: $62.35B Assume Strategy keeps buying 56,000 BTC per month for 5 years. That is: ASSUMING STRC GROWTH TOTALLY STOPS (LOL) ~672,000 BTC per year ~3,360,000 BTC over 5 years Their stack goes from: 818,334 BTC to 4,178,334 BTC Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% CAGR. Bitcoin goes from: $76,196 to roughly: $232,532 So the Bitcoin NAV becomes: 4,178,334 BTC × $232,532 = roughly $971.5 BILLION Almost $1 TRILLION in Bitcoin NAV. And the funniest part? This model assumes no mNAV expansion. No premium insanity. No additional acceleration. No credit flywheel getting stronger. No market panic as everyone realizes Strategy is vacuuming Bitcoin off the planet like a publicly traded monetary black hole. Just: 56,000 BTC per month. 25% Bitcoin CAGR. 5 years. That’s it. Don't think they can accumulate that much Bitcoin at that low of a CAGR? Think the Bitcoin CAGR has to go higher? Cool. That only helps Strategy buy more Bitcoin. The bear case is basically: “Sure, they are absorbing multiples of new supply, building the largest corporate Bitcoin balance sheet in history, converting fiat capital markets into Bitcoin ownership, and compounding NAV at escape velocity, but have you considered that I am emotionally upset?” MSTR is becoming the most aggressive Bitcoin accumulation machine ever built. The fiat world is still modeling it like a tech stock with a weird treasury policy. GOOD LUCK.

Adam Livingston

61,600 次观看 • 5 个月前

BREAKING 🚨Google’s quantum chip didn’t prove we live in a multiverse. It just proved the universe is one beautifully connected sea.🧨 Google’s latest quantum chip solved a problem in five minutes that would take a classical supercomputer 10 septillion years. Some physicists are calling it proof of a multiverse — the idea that every possible outcome branches into its own reality, so the chip is somehow “sampling” answers from parallel universes. Uniphics shows there is no need for any multiverse. Everything is made of spinning Gyrotrons whose waves propagate through one single ξM-field sea of unbound energy that fills all space. When the quantum chip sets up its qubits, those Gyrotrons create vast networks of perfectly coherent spin waves. Because the waves interfere across the entire sea at once, the chip can explore enormous numbers of possibilities simultaneously — not by jumping into other universes, but by letting the single connected field do what it always does: keep perfect harmony across its entire volume. The speed-up comes from the natural parallelism of spin-wave interference plus local time-flow variations (t_flow = k / E_d,total) that let dense regions of the chip run on slightly different clocks, giving the appearance of massive parallel computation without ever leaving our one deterministic universe. The same three pillars that explain gravity as a push and the cyclic cosmos also turn quantum computing into simple, single-universe physics. The universe isn’t splitting into trillions of realities every time a chip runs. It’s simply one sea singing in perfect harmony — and Google just learned a new note. How soon will quantum computing explode when we stop inventing multiverses and start engineering the single connected sea? A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything. Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free:
0:10

BREAKING 🚨Google’s quantum chip didn’t prove we live in a multiverse. It just proved the universe is one beautifully connected sea.🧨 Google’s latest quantum chip solved a problem in five minutes that would take a classical supercomputer 10 septillion years. Some physicists are calling it proof of a multiverse — the idea that every possible outcome branches into its own reality, so the chip is somehow “sampling” answers from parallel universes. Uniphics shows there is no need for any multiverse. Everything is made of spinning Gyrotrons whose waves propagate through one single ξM-field sea of unbound energy that fills all space. When the quantum chip sets up its qubits, those Gyrotrons create vast networks of perfectly coherent spin waves. Because the waves interfere across the entire sea at once, the chip can explore enormous numbers of possibilities simultaneously — not by jumping into other universes, but by letting the single connected field do what it always does: keep perfect harmony across its entire volume. The speed-up comes from the natural parallelism of spin-wave interference plus local time-flow variations (t_flow = k / E_d,total) that let dense regions of the chip run on slightly different clocks, giving the appearance of massive parallel computation without ever leaving our one deterministic universe. The same three pillars that explain gravity as a push and the cyclic cosmos also turn quantum computing into simple, single-universe physics. The universe isn’t splitting into trillions of realities every time a chip runs. It’s simply one sea singing in perfect harmony — and Google just learned a new note. How soon will quantum computing explode when we stop inventing multiverses and start engineering the single connected sea? A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything. Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free:

Paul Maley

46,801 次观看 • 6 个月前

1. Dr. René Peoc'h built a robot that turned randomly left and right, completely at random as it moved through an arena. As a control, he recorded its path with no chicks present. It covered the arena evenly. Exactly as probability predicted. Then he introduced newly hatched chicks who had imprinted on the robot as their mother. He put them in a cage on one side of the arena. They could see the robot. They couldn't move toward it. 2. What happened defied physics. The robot still moving completely at random, with no modifications began spending the majority of its time in the half of the arena closest to the chicks. The sheer intention of the baby chicks wanting to be near what they believed was their mother, influenced the movement of a computerized machine. The study was published. Peer-reviewed. Replicated. 3. This is not mysticism. This is quantum mechanics. At the subatomic level, matter does not exist as a fixed thing. Electrons exist as waves of possibility infinite potential until they are observed. The moment a conscious observer focuses attention on a quantum possibility, it collapses from energy into matter. This is called collapsing the wave function. It is not metaphor. It is the foundation of quantum physics. 4. What Dr. Joe Dispenza's research shows: When a person enters a genuine state of elevated emotion: gratitude, joy, love while holding a clear intention for their future, they change their electromagnetic signature. When that signature matches the frequency of a potential that already exists in the quantum field. The experience finds them. Without effort. Without forcing. His son. A student who won a lottery ticket. Tumors that disappeared. New jobs that arrived without applications. Thousands of documented cases. 5. You are not separate from what you want to create. You are the antenna. And what you broadcast through the quality of your thoughts and the elevation of your emotions is what reality responds to. The chicks didn't move toward the robot. The robot moved toward them.
0:19

1. Dr. René Peoc'h built a robot that turned randomly left and right, completely at random as it moved through an arena. As a control, he recorded its path with no chicks present. It covered the arena evenly. Exactly as probability predicted. Then he introduced newly hatched chicks who had imprinted on the robot as their mother. He put them in a cage on one side of the arena. They could see the robot. They couldn't move toward it. 2. What happened defied physics. The robot still moving completely at random, with no modifications began spending the majority of its time in the half of the arena closest to the chicks. The sheer intention of the baby chicks wanting to be near what they believed was their mother, influenced the movement of a computerized machine. The study was published. Peer-reviewed. Replicated. 3. This is not mysticism. This is quantum mechanics. At the subatomic level, matter does not exist as a fixed thing. Electrons exist as waves of possibility infinite potential until they are observed. The moment a conscious observer focuses attention on a quantum possibility, it collapses from energy into matter. This is called collapsing the wave function. It is not metaphor. It is the foundation of quantum physics. 4. What Dr. Joe Dispenza's research shows: When a person enters a genuine state of elevated emotion: gratitude, joy, love while holding a clear intention for their future, they change their electromagnetic signature. When that signature matches the frequency of a potential that already exists in the quantum field. The experience finds them. Without effort. Without forcing. His son. A student who won a lottery ticket. Tumors that disappeared. New jobs that arrived without applications. Thousands of documented cases. 5. You are not separate from what you want to create. You are the antenna. And what you broadcast through the quality of your thoughts and the elevation of your emotions is what reality responds to. The chicks didn't move toward the robot. The robot moved toward them.

🧬Maxpein🧬

35,310 次观看 • 14 天前

32 coins. $2.5 million. 0.0038% of the stack. That is the sale the market is now blaming for a $3 billion liquidation cascade and a Bitcoin price nearly halved from its peak. A $2.5 million sale cannot move a trillion-dollar asset. It is a rounding error. In the same week, Strategy raised $128.3 million selling its own stock, 50 times larger. It did not need to sell coins. It chose to. The crash has real drivers: a record 13-day run of ETF outflows, a rotation into AI, a Fed in no hurry to cut. But the accelerant the market keeps naming is 32 coins. The coins were never the point. The signal was. And the signal was deliberate. Michael Saylor told the Q1 call he would “probably sell some bitcoin to pay a dividend just to inoculate the market and send the message that we did it.” His logic was sound: prove the Bitcoin is usable capital, not a vault that can never be opened, and show he is not a prisoner of his own vow. His “never sell” always meant be a net accumulator. He is up more than 170,000 coins this year against the 32 he sold, and he scores himself on one number, Bitcoin per share. By that math, defending the dividend with a sliver was discipline, not distress. The market read it as the opposite. The dose became the catalyst now blamed for the crash. The inoculation became the infection. Because what changed was never Strategy’s solvency. It was its identity. The market has stopped pricing a permanent holder and started pricing what the filings always described: a state-contingent allocator now funding its own preferred dividends, at the margin, from the Bitcoin beneath them. And the buffer is thinning. The cash reserve behind those dividends has fallen from $2.25 billion to $900 million. Against a preferred bill near $1.7 billion a year, that is roughly 6 months of runway. Be precise. This is not a death spiral. Strategy still holds 843,706 Bitcoin, worth more than $50 billion even now, and has more funding levers than almost any company alive. A real rally makes this a footnote, and the sell-side calling the reaction overdone is not wrong on the fundamentals. But the regime has changed. The question is no longer Bitcoin’s price on any given day. It is the cadence of the dividend declarations and the path of that reserve. Bitcoin did not acquire a yield. The wrapper acquired liabilities. This week the market learned that difference costs far more than 32 coins.
0:10

32 coins. $2.5 million. 0.0038% of the stack. That is the sale the market is now blaming for a $3 billion liquidation cascade and a Bitcoin price nearly halved from its peak. A $2.5 million sale cannot move a trillion-dollar asset. It is a rounding error. In the same week, Strategy raised $128.3 million selling its own stock, 50 times larger. It did not need to sell coins. It chose to. The crash has real drivers: a record 13-day run of ETF outflows, a rotation into AI, a Fed in no hurry to cut. But the accelerant the market keeps naming is 32 coins. The coins were never the point. The signal was. And the signal was deliberate. Michael Saylor told the Q1 call he would “probably sell some bitcoin to pay a dividend just to inoculate the market and send the message that we did it.” His logic was sound: prove the Bitcoin is usable capital, not a vault that can never be opened, and show he is not a prisoner of his own vow. His “never sell” always meant be a net accumulator. He is up more than 170,000 coins this year against the 32 he sold, and he scores himself on one number, Bitcoin per share. By that math, defending the dividend with a sliver was discipline, not distress. The market read it as the opposite. The dose became the catalyst now blamed for the crash. The inoculation became the infection. Because what changed was never Strategy’s solvency. It was its identity. The market has stopped pricing a permanent holder and started pricing what the filings always described: a state-contingent allocator now funding its own preferred dividends, at the margin, from the Bitcoin beneath them. And the buffer is thinning. The cash reserve behind those dividends has fallen from $2.25 billion to $900 million. Against a preferred bill near $1.7 billion a year, that is roughly 6 months of runway. Be precise. This is not a death spiral. Strategy still holds 843,706 Bitcoin, worth more than $50 billion even now, and has more funding levers than almost any company alive. A real rally makes this a footnote, and the sell-side calling the reaction overdone is not wrong on the fundamentals. But the regime has changed. The question is no longer Bitcoin’s price on any given day. It is the cadence of the dividend declarations and the path of that reserve. Bitcoin did not acquire a yield. The wrapper acquired liabilities. This week the market learned that difference costs far more than 32 coins.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

165,572 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨SCIENCE🚨: Time just got a remix — and exotic quantum matter started showing up uninvited 🧨 Scientists at California Polytechnic State University just dropped a bombshell on May 4, 2026: by periodically driving magnetic fields in graphene over time, they created entirely new quantum states of matter that flat-out do not exist under any static conditions. These driven phases are dramatically more stable and error-resistant — exactly the kind of breakthrough quantum computing has been starving for. Standard models are left asking why time itself seems to be the missing ingredient. Uniphics sees this as inevitable once you accept the three pillars. Time flow (t_flow) is not a universal constant — it is strictly t_flow = k / E_d, where k = 4.64159 × 10^18 J/m³ is the fixed reference density set by the electron Gyrotron volume. When researchers vary the magnetic field periodically, they are rhythmically modulating local energy density (E_d) in time. That creates transient windows where t_flow itself shifts, opening entirely new minima in the ξM-field potential that negentropy (the drive toward lowest energy, J_neg ≈ −5.66 × 10^{-21} J/K) can lock into stable spin configurations. The Gyrotrons — each a 3D gyroscope of three orthogonal spin quanta (xy, xz, yz planes), every quantum a tempest of whirling energy spinning CW or CCW — access driven phases that static E_d simply cannot sustain. The result: exotic states with no static counterpart, far more resistant to decoherence because they are continuously refreshed by the same negentropy that condensed the first bound matter at the Amorphics-to-Physics transition. No new particles, no extra dimensions, no patches — just the pillars doing what they do best: turning dynamic E_d into order. This is why the new states are so robust. The time-dependent drive keeps the system dancing exactly where unbound energy repels unbound energy just enough to hold the new lock without collapse. How might deliberately engineering time flow gradients in real materials accelerate fault-tolerant quantum computers — or even let us replay the driven phases that built the early universe? A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything. #Uniphics #QuantumStates #TimeFlow #EnergyDensity #SpinQuanta Grok xAI Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia
0:10

🚨SCIENCE🚨: Time just got a remix — and exotic quantum matter started showing up uninvited 🧨 Scientists at California Polytechnic State University just dropped a bombshell on May 4, 2026: by periodically driving magnetic fields in graphene over time, they created entirely new quantum states of matter that flat-out do not exist under any static conditions. These driven phases are dramatically more stable and error-resistant — exactly the kind of breakthrough quantum computing has been starving for. Standard models are left asking why time itself seems to be the missing ingredient. Uniphics sees this as inevitable once you accept the three pillars. Time flow (t_flow) is not a universal constant — it is strictly t_flow = k / E_d, where k = 4.64159 × 10^18 J/m³ is the fixed reference density set by the electron Gyrotron volume. When researchers vary the magnetic field periodically, they are rhythmically modulating local energy density (E_d) in time. That creates transient windows where t_flow itself shifts, opening entirely new minima in the ξM-field potential that negentropy (the drive toward lowest energy, J_neg ≈ −5.66 × 10^{-21} J/K) can lock into stable spin configurations. The Gyrotrons — each a 3D gyroscope of three orthogonal spin quanta (xy, xz, yz planes), every quantum a tempest of whirling energy spinning CW or CCW — access driven phases that static E_d simply cannot sustain. The result: exotic states with no static counterpart, far more resistant to decoherence because they are continuously refreshed by the same negentropy that condensed the first bound matter at the Amorphics-to-Physics transition. No new particles, no extra dimensions, no patches — just the pillars doing what they do best: turning dynamic E_d into order. This is why the new states are so robust. The time-dependent drive keeps the system dancing exactly where unbound energy repels unbound energy just enough to hold the new lock without collapse. How might deliberately engineering time flow gradients in real materials accelerate fault-tolerant quantum computers — or even let us replay the driven phases that built the early universe? A Theory of Everything should be able to answer everything. #Uniphics #QuantumStates #TimeFlow #EnergyDensity #SpinQuanta Grok xAI Uniphics Explained Simply PDF: Chapters 1–10 free: Grokipedia

Paul Maley

11,804 次观看 • 4 个月前

WELF Ecosystem Update – August 2025 Here’s the latest from the WELF ecosystem, covering new partnerships updates, conversions and product launches! $15,000 Conversion to $WELF Has Been Completed! We have recently converted another $10,000 into $WELF Tokens, executed from revenue by Welf Solutions. Following an earlier $5,000 conversion the week before, bringing the all-time total to $90,000. These conversions are fully funded by revenue generated through Welf Solutions and are executed 50/50 across centralized and decentralized exchanges to support balanced liquidity. $WELF Introducing the First WELF DAO! We’re proud to say that we’ve launched WELF DAO last week, a place for community governance. It’s where every member has a voice in deciding what’s next for WELF. Our very first WELF DAO proposal has officially ended, and our community has decided. 79.62% of votes chose a 3-day (72 hours) default voting timeframe. This will now serve as the standard for all upcoming DAO proposals! New Partnership with Qubit! We’re excited to announce a new partnership with Qubit, a platform bridging the worlds of quantum technology and Web3, making advanced quantum tools accessible for real use cases today! As Qubit delivers the quantum infrastructure for a secure and unpredictable Web3, WELF provides the financial layer to turn that innovation into long-term, personalized wealth strategies. $WELF Joins the RWA Top Gainer List on CoinMarketCap! Last week, $WELF has secured a spot on the top gainers list based on 24 hour percentage, ranking #2! We keep on building, and we’re excited for what’s ahead! Thank you for your support as we shape the future of $WELF.
0:10

WELF Ecosystem Update – August 2025 Here’s the latest from the WELF ecosystem, covering new partnerships updates, conversions and product launches! $15,000 Conversion to $WELF Has Been Completed! We have recently converted another $10,000 into $WELF Tokens, executed from revenue by Welf Solutions. Following an earlier $5,000 conversion the week before, bringing the all-time total to $90,000. These conversions are fully funded by revenue generated through Welf Solutions and are executed 50/50 across centralized and decentralized exchanges to support balanced liquidity. $WELF Introducing the First WELF DAO! We’re proud to say that we’ve launched WELF DAO last week, a place for community governance. It’s where every member has a voice in deciding what’s next for WELF. Our very first WELF DAO proposal has officially ended, and our community has decided. 79.62% of votes chose a 3-day (72 hours) default voting timeframe. This will now serve as the standard for all upcoming DAO proposals! New Partnership with Qubit! We’re excited to announce a new partnership with Qubit, a platform bridging the worlds of quantum technology and Web3, making advanced quantum tools accessible for real use cases today! As Qubit delivers the quantum infrastructure for a secure and unpredictable Web3, WELF provides the financial layer to turn that innovation into long-term, personalized wealth strategies. $WELF Joins the RWA Top Gainer List on CoinMarketCap! Last week, $WELF has secured a spot on the top gainers list based on 24 hour percentage, ranking #2! We keep on building, and we’re excited for what’s ahead! Thank you for your support as we shape the future of $WELF.

Welf Finance

31,305 次观看 • 1 年前

🚀ASST TO $700 PER SHARE?!?🚀 YOU THINK I'M JOKING? THINK AGAIN, BUCKO. Current ASST snapshot: BTC holdings: 15,000.5 BTC BTC price: $80,593 Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Total debt: $10M Preferred outstanding: $495.95M Debt + preferred: $505.95M Amplification ratio: 41.9% Current stock price: $15.85 Now here’s the model, and this isn't MOONBOY NONSENSE, kids. This is with Bitcoin at $750k in 2036, not $1 million in 2034. ASST maintains their current 41.9% amplification ratio for 10 years. Translation for normal people: For every $1.00 of Bitcoin NAV, ASST keeps roughly $0.419 of senior claims through debt/preferred financing. The bears hear that and immediately start sweating through a Men’s Wearhouse suit. But this is the actual machine. As Bitcoin rises, the Bitcoin NAV rises. When the NAV rises, the old preferred stack becomes smaller relative to the treasury. So ASST issues more SATA to keep amplification at 41.9%. That new SATA capital buys more Bitcoin. Then Bitcoin goes up again. Then the NAV goes up again. Then the amplification ratio drops again. Then they issue more SATA again. Then they buy more Bitcoin again. This is how you turn a balance sheet into a legally registered orange crocodile. Now we add the funding mix: 75% of new Bitcoin accumulation comes from SATA. 25% comes from issuing common stock. And the common stock is issued at 1.2x EV mNAV. Meaning they are selling equity at a 20% premium to the enterprise value of the Bitcoin stack. That matters. Because issuing common below NAV is financial self-harm. Issuing common above NAV is accretive treasury sorcery. Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% per year for 10 years. BTC price goes from: $80,593 today to roughly: $750,579 in year 10 That is a 9.3x move in Bitcoin. Now what happens to ASST? Starting BTC stack: 15,000.5 BTC Projected year 10 BTC stack: 143,425 BTC That is 9.6x more Bitcoin. Starting Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Projected year 10 Bitcoin NAV: $107.65B That is 89x larger. Now the bears will say: “BUT THE PREFERREDS!” Yes, Carl. The preferreds are the point. Senior claims rise from $505.95M to $45.11B because the model intentionally keeps amplification at 41.9%. That sounds terrifying until you remember the Bitcoin NAV grew to $107.65B. The stack got bigger. The senior claims got bigger. The common equity claim got bigger too. This is where CEBE comes in. CEBE = Common Equity Bitcoin Exposure. It answers the only question that matters: After debt and preferred holders get their claim, how much Bitcoin exposure does the common shareholder really own? Today: Gross BPS: 20,222 sats CEBE/share: 11,759 sats Year 10: Gross BPS: 95,380 sats CEBE/share: 55,416 sats That means common-equity Bitcoin exposure per share rises about 4.7x. Even after common issuance. Even after maintaining the preferred stack. Even after the bears finish their sacred ritual of screaming “DILUTION” into a spreadsheet they opened sideways. Now the share count. Current implied diluted shares: 74.2M Projected year 10 shares: 150.4M So yes, the share count roughly doubles in this model. But the Bitcoin stack goes 9.6x. This is the entire game. If Bitcoin holdings grow much faster than shares outstanding, the common shareholder’s Bitcoin exposure goes up. The bears think all issuance is bad because they learned finance from a Yahoo message board during a divorce. The actual question is: Does issuance increase Bitcoin per share after senior claims? In this model, yes. Now the stock price. Strict 1.2x EV mNAV model gets ASST to about: $559/share But if we anchor the model to today’s actual ASST price of $15.85, the same growth path gets you to roughly: $696/share Call it $700. There it is. ASST to $700 per share is not “vibes.” It is a model. BTC compounds at 25%. SATA funds 75% of accumulation. Common funds 25% at 1.2x EV mNAV. Amplification stays at 41.9%. BTC stack grows from 15,000 BTC to 143,425 BTC. Bitcoin NAV goes from $1.21B to $107.65B. CEBE/share goes from 11,759 sats to 55,416 sats. The stock goes from $15.85 to roughly $700. This is why small Bitcoin treasury companies are so insane. Strategy is the Death Star. ASST is the weird little orange lab experiment in the basement where someone accidentally discovers corporate finance methamphetamine. Tiny denominator. Preferred financing. Bitcoin accumulation. Premium equity issuance. CEBE expansion. A compounding treasury loop. The bear case is that dilution kills the common. The bull case is that accretive dilution plus preferred financing creates a Bitcoin-per-share machine that eats capital markets and leaves behind a pile of traumatized short sellers asking why their model still says “book value.” ASST to $700? If the machine works, yes. If Bitcoin does 25% CAGR, absolutely possible. If SATA scales and common gets issued above NAV, the goblin gets fed. And once the goblin gets fed, the spreadsheet starts looking like it was written by Saylor, Dylan LeClair, and a sleep-deprived Austrian economist locked inside a treasury dashboard with three Celsius energy drinks. This is not financial advice. This is FINANCIAL ENTERTAINMENT:
0:20

🚀ASST TO $700 PER SHARE?!?🚀 YOU THINK I'M JOKING? THINK AGAIN, BUCKO. Current ASST snapshot: BTC holdings: 15,000.5 BTC BTC price: $80,593 Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Total debt: $10M Preferred outstanding: $495.95M Debt + preferred: $505.95M Amplification ratio: 41.9% Current stock price: $15.85 Now here’s the model, and this isn't MOONBOY NONSENSE, kids. This is with Bitcoin at $750k in 2036, not $1 million in 2034. ASST maintains their current 41.9% amplification ratio for 10 years. Translation for normal people: For every $1.00 of Bitcoin NAV, ASST keeps roughly $0.419 of senior claims through debt/preferred financing. The bears hear that and immediately start sweating through a Men’s Wearhouse suit. But this is the actual machine. As Bitcoin rises, the Bitcoin NAV rises. When the NAV rises, the old preferred stack becomes smaller relative to the treasury. So ASST issues more SATA to keep amplification at 41.9%. That new SATA capital buys more Bitcoin. Then Bitcoin goes up again. Then the NAV goes up again. Then the amplification ratio drops again. Then they issue more SATA again. Then they buy more Bitcoin again. This is how you turn a balance sheet into a legally registered orange crocodile. Now we add the funding mix: 75% of new Bitcoin accumulation comes from SATA. 25% comes from issuing common stock. And the common stock is issued at 1.2x EV mNAV. Meaning they are selling equity at a 20% premium to the enterprise value of the Bitcoin stack. That matters. Because issuing common below NAV is financial self-harm. Issuing common above NAV is accretive treasury sorcery. Now assume Bitcoin compounds at 25% per year for 10 years. BTC price goes from: $80,593 today to roughly: $750,579 in year 10 That is a 9.3x move in Bitcoin. Now what happens to ASST? Starting BTC stack: 15,000.5 BTC Projected year 10 BTC stack: 143,425 BTC That is 9.6x more Bitcoin. Starting Bitcoin NAV: $1.21B Projected year 10 Bitcoin NAV: $107.65B That is 89x larger. Now the bears will say: “BUT THE PREFERREDS!” Yes, Carl. The preferreds are the point. Senior claims rise from $505.95M to $45.11B because the model intentionally keeps amplification at 41.9%. That sounds terrifying until you remember the Bitcoin NAV grew to $107.65B. The stack got bigger. The senior claims got bigger. The common equity claim got bigger too. This is where CEBE comes in. CEBE = Common Equity Bitcoin Exposure. It answers the only question that matters: After debt and preferred holders get their claim, how much Bitcoin exposure does the common shareholder really own? Today: Gross BPS: 20,222 sats CEBE/share: 11,759 sats Year 10: Gross BPS: 95,380 sats CEBE/share: 55,416 sats That means common-equity Bitcoin exposure per share rises about 4.7x. Even after common issuance. Even after maintaining the preferred stack. Even after the bears finish their sacred ritual of screaming “DILUTION” into a spreadsheet they opened sideways. Now the share count. Current implied diluted shares: 74.2M Projected year 10 shares: 150.4M So yes, the share count roughly doubles in this model. But the Bitcoin stack goes 9.6x. This is the entire game. If Bitcoin holdings grow much faster than shares outstanding, the common shareholder’s Bitcoin exposure goes up. The bears think all issuance is bad because they learned finance from a Yahoo message board during a divorce. The actual question is: Does issuance increase Bitcoin per share after senior claims? In this model, yes. Now the stock price. Strict 1.2x EV mNAV model gets ASST to about: $559/share But if we anchor the model to today’s actual ASST price of $15.85, the same growth path gets you to roughly: $696/share Call it $700. There it is. ASST to $700 per share is not “vibes.” It is a model. BTC compounds at 25%. SATA funds 75% of accumulation. Common funds 25% at 1.2x EV mNAV. Amplification stays at 41.9%. BTC stack grows from 15,000 BTC to 143,425 BTC. Bitcoin NAV goes from $1.21B to $107.65B. CEBE/share goes from 11,759 sats to 55,416 sats. The stock goes from $15.85 to roughly $700. This is why small Bitcoin treasury companies are so insane. Strategy is the Death Star. ASST is the weird little orange lab experiment in the basement where someone accidentally discovers corporate finance methamphetamine. Tiny denominator. Preferred financing. Bitcoin accumulation. Premium equity issuance. CEBE expansion. A compounding treasury loop. The bear case is that dilution kills the common. The bull case is that accretive dilution plus preferred financing creates a Bitcoin-per-share machine that eats capital markets and leaves behind a pile of traumatized short sellers asking why their model still says “book value.” ASST to $700? If the machine works, yes. If Bitcoin does 25% CAGR, absolutely possible. If SATA scales and common gets issued above NAV, the goblin gets fed. And once the goblin gets fed, the spreadsheet starts looking like it was written by Saylor, Dylan LeClair, and a sleep-deprived Austrian economist locked inside a treasury dashboard with three Celsius energy drinks. This is not financial advice. This is FINANCIAL ENTERTAINMENT:

Adam Livingston

66,707 次观看 • 4 个月前

Ray Dalio is right about one thing: Bitcoin forces you to think harder. But zoom out. 1) “Bitcoin has no privacy.” Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. That’s by design. Transparency is what makes it auditable, trust-minimized, and globally verifiable. Privacy isn’t binary — it’s a spectrum. Second-layer solutions like Lightning Network improve transactional privacy, and self-custody + best practices eliminate counterparty surveillance. If your definition of “privacy” is “opaque like the banking system,” then yes — Bitcoin is different. It replaces institutional secrecy with mathematical transparency. 2) “Central banks don’t want to buy Bitcoin.” Correct. Central banks also didn’t want the internet, stablecoins, or gold leaving their vaults. Bitcoin isn’t competing for central bank approval. It’s competing as neutral collateral in a world of weaponized fiat. When sovereign debt hits structural limits, assets without counterparty risk win. That’s why individuals, institutions, ETFs, and even nation-states accumulate it — regardless of central bank preferences. 3) “Quantum computing issues.” If quantum breaks Bitcoin’s cryptography, it breaks the entire global financial system first — SWIFT, online banking, military communications. Bitcoin can upgrade via consensus long before that scenario materializes. Cryptography evolves. That’s not a flaw; that’s software. 4) “Relatively small and controlled market.” Every monetization process starts small. Gold was once a niche commodity. The internet was once “small and controlled.” Bitcoin’s market cap reflects 15 years of monetization — with no CEO, no marketing budget, and no state backing. And “controlled”? Try censoring a decentralized network running across tens of thousands of nodes worldwide. Dalio views Bitcoin through a macro-hedge lens. But Bitcoin isn’t just an asset. It’s: •Programmatic scarcity (21M hard cap) •Final settlement without intermediaries •Borderless value transfer •A hedge against monetary debasement The real question isn’t whether central banks want Bitcoin. It’s whether individuals want money that can’t be inflated, frozen, or diluted. History suggests they do.
0:10

Ray Dalio is right about one thing: Bitcoin forces you to think harder. But zoom out. 1) “Bitcoin has no privacy.” Bitcoin is pseudonymous, not anonymous. That’s by design. Transparency is what makes it auditable, trust-minimized, and globally verifiable. Privacy isn’t binary — it’s a spectrum. Second-layer solutions like Lightning Network improve transactional privacy, and self-custody + best practices eliminate counterparty surveillance. If your definition of “privacy” is “opaque like the banking system,” then yes — Bitcoin is different. It replaces institutional secrecy with mathematical transparency. 2) “Central banks don’t want to buy Bitcoin.” Correct. Central banks also didn’t want the internet, stablecoins, or gold leaving their vaults. Bitcoin isn’t competing for central bank approval. It’s competing as neutral collateral in a world of weaponized fiat. When sovereign debt hits structural limits, assets without counterparty risk win. That’s why individuals, institutions, ETFs, and even nation-states accumulate it — regardless of central bank preferences. 3) “Quantum computing issues.” If quantum breaks Bitcoin’s cryptography, it breaks the entire global financial system first — SWIFT, online banking, military communications. Bitcoin can upgrade via consensus long before that scenario materializes. Cryptography evolves. That’s not a flaw; that’s software. 4) “Relatively small and controlled market.” Every monetization process starts small. Gold was once a niche commodity. The internet was once “small and controlled.” Bitcoin’s market cap reflects 15 years of monetization — with no CEO, no marketing budget, and no state backing. And “controlled”? Try censoring a decentralized network running across tens of thousands of nodes worldwide. Dalio views Bitcoin through a macro-hedge lens. But Bitcoin isn’t just an asset. It’s: •Programmatic scarcity (21M hard cap) •Final settlement without intermediaries •Borderless value transfer •A hedge against monetary debasement The real question isn’t whether central banks want Bitcoin. It’s whether individuals want money that can’t be inflated, frozen, or diluted. History suggests they do.

Asaf · Satoshi Signal ⚡ @SatoshiSignal

22,503 次观看 • 6 个月前

The wait is over. The People’s Launchpad is now LIVE! First up on our launchpad is Merlin Chain, a Bitcoin Layer-2 solution that integrates ZK-Rollups, a decentralized oracle network, and on-chain BTC fraud-proof modules to make Bitcoin fun again. 🟣 Ticker: $MERL 🟣 Total Prize Pool: $1,000 for 21,000,000 $MERL (1% of total token supply) 🟣 Token Listing at $100,000 Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) 1️⃣ Instructions to participate: To get an allocation on $MERL tokens, you'll need to accumulate Power on our Launchpad. The more Power you have, the higher your allocation. $BTC and $ALLY holders will have 5 days to accrue Power. 2️⃣ You can get Power through each/combination of the 3 methods: 1. Holding $BTC on Merlin Chain's Mainnet 2. Staking $ALLY. Power is accrued based on the amount and length of stake 3. Referring users to participate in the campaign and completing community tasks 3️⃣ Timeline: ◢ Period for accumulating Power: 5 - 10 Feb (12pm UTC). ◢ Redemption Period 10 - 11 Feb (12pm UTC). ◢ Tokens will be distributed once Merlin Chain's tokens are released. 📢 Note: This Launchpad includes multiple dynamics, such as bridging to a Bitcoin L2 chain, that will be unique for most users. As such, we strongly recommend reading our participation guide at
0:16

The wait is over. The People’s Launchpad is now LIVE! First up on our launchpad is Merlin Chain, a Bitcoin Layer-2 solution that integrates ZK-Rollups, a decentralized oracle network, and on-chain BTC fraud-proof modules to make Bitcoin fun again. 🟣 Ticker: $MERL 🟣 Total Prize Pool: $1,000 for 21,000,000 $MERL (1% of total token supply) 🟣 Token Listing at $100,000 Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) 1️⃣ Instructions to participate: To get an allocation on $MERL tokens, you'll need to accumulate Power on our Launchpad. The more Power you have, the higher your allocation. $BTC and $ALLY holders will have 5 days to accrue Power. 2️⃣ You can get Power through each/combination of the 3 methods: 1. Holding $BTC on Merlin Chain's Mainnet 2. Staking $ALLY. Power is accrued based on the amount and length of stake 3. Referring users to participate in the campaign and completing community tasks 3️⃣ Timeline: ◢ Period for accumulating Power: 5 - 10 Feb (12pm UTC). ◢ Redemption Period 10 - 11 Feb (12pm UTC). ◢ Tokens will be distributed once Merlin Chain's tokens are released. 📢 Note: This Launchpad includes multiple dynamics, such as bridging to a Bitcoin L2 chain, that will be unique for most users. As such, we strongly recommend reading our participation guide at

Particle Network

1,829,214 次观看 • 2 年前

The biggest Bitcoin miners on earth are quietly walking away from mining Bitcoin, and the reason is not the one everyone keeps repeating. They are not fleeing a dead business. They lost an auction for their own power, and the winner was artificial intelligence. Start with the brutal arithmetic. It now costs the average public miner around $80,000 in cash to produce a single Bitcoin, and for stretches of this year $BTC traded below that. The most efficient operators on the cheapest power still clear a margin, but an estimated 15 to 20 percent of the global fleet is mining at a loss right now, burning more in power than the coins are worth the second they are minted. Three straight downward difficulty adjustments earlier this year, the first such streak since 2022, were the footprint of machines going dark. That looks like a simple story of a broken business until you see the number that explains the exodus. The same megawatt of power that earns a Bitcoin miner roughly $1 million a year earns between $10 and $20 million a year hosting AI compute. Ten to twenty times more, for the identical electricity, substation, and cooling. What made industrial miners valuable was never the mining. It was the power contracts, the land, the grid interconnects. AI walked in and bid an order of magnitude higher for exactly those assets. Mining did not fail. It got outbid for its own infrastructure. When Core Scientific runs its BTC segment at a negative margin while its AI colocation business prints money, the decision writes itself. CoinShares estimates listed miners could pull up to 70 percent of their revenue from AI by year end, up from about 30 percent. The power is being repriced to its highest use, and Bitcoin lost the bidding. If the giants leave, what happens to the network they secured? The doom posts assume it weakens. It does not, because Bitcoin has a self-healing reflex written into its core. When miners switch off, blocks slow, and within two weeks difficulty automatically drops, which makes mining cheaper and more profitable for everyone still running. The security does not vanish, it relocates, and you can already see where. State-backed pools are appearing, with one Gulf operator reportedly standing up a national pool near 3 percent of global hashrate, alongside private fleets and the handful of public miners like Marathon still choosing to buy Bitcoin rather than lease their power away. The network even hit an all-time high above one zettahash this year as the pivot accelerated. It does not need any particular miner. It needs someone, somewhere, for whom the math still works, and cheap stranded power has no shortage of those. But there is a deeper timer here, and the AI pivot just exposed it. Today miners earn almost everything from the block subsidy and almost nothing from fees, often under one percent of revenue on a quiet day. That subsidy halves again in 2028, and every four years after, marching toward zero. For Bitcoin to pay for its own security forever, fees eventually have to replace it. The open question is whether they can, and the evidence cuts both ways. On busy days, during token launches and inscription waves, fees have already spiked past 15 percent of revenue, and in 2024 some blocks earned more in fees than the entire subsidy. The capacity is there in bursts. Whether bursts become a baseline is the single most important unanswered question in Bitcoin. The AI exodus did not create that question. It pulled the cover off it years early, and showed how fast capital abandons hashing the moment something pays more. So the honest read is not that AI kills Bitcoin mining. It is stranger than that. AI is the first bidder rich enough to reveal what Bitcoin's security was always quietly worth, and what it will cost to keep once the free coins stop coming. The miners are not abandoning a sinking ship. They are selling the deck to a higher bidder while the same clock everyone forgot about keeps ticking underneath.
0:10

The biggest Bitcoin miners on earth are quietly walking away from mining Bitcoin, and the reason is not the one everyone keeps repeating. They are not fleeing a dead business. They lost an auction for their own power, and the winner was artificial intelligence. Start with the brutal arithmetic. It now costs the average public miner around $80,000 in cash to produce a single Bitcoin, and for stretches of this year $BTC traded below that. The most efficient operators on the cheapest power still clear a margin, but an estimated 15 to 20 percent of the global fleet is mining at a loss right now, burning more in power than the coins are worth the second they are minted. Three straight downward difficulty adjustments earlier this year, the first such streak since 2022, were the footprint of machines going dark. That looks like a simple story of a broken business until you see the number that explains the exodus. The same megawatt of power that earns a Bitcoin miner roughly $1 million a year earns between $10 and $20 million a year hosting AI compute. Ten to twenty times more, for the identical electricity, substation, and cooling. What made industrial miners valuable was never the mining. It was the power contracts, the land, the grid interconnects. AI walked in and bid an order of magnitude higher for exactly those assets. Mining did not fail. It got outbid for its own infrastructure. When Core Scientific runs its BTC segment at a negative margin while its AI colocation business prints money, the decision writes itself. CoinShares estimates listed miners could pull up to 70 percent of their revenue from AI by year end, up from about 30 percent. The power is being repriced to its highest use, and Bitcoin lost the bidding. If the giants leave, what happens to the network they secured? The doom posts assume it weakens. It does not, because Bitcoin has a self-healing reflex written into its core. When miners switch off, blocks slow, and within two weeks difficulty automatically drops, which makes mining cheaper and more profitable for everyone still running. The security does not vanish, it relocates, and you can already see where. State-backed pools are appearing, with one Gulf operator reportedly standing up a national pool near 3 percent of global hashrate, alongside private fleets and the handful of public miners like Marathon still choosing to buy Bitcoin rather than lease their power away. The network even hit an all-time high above one zettahash this year as the pivot accelerated. It does not need any particular miner. It needs someone, somewhere, for whom the math still works, and cheap stranded power has no shortage of those. But there is a deeper timer here, and the AI pivot just exposed it. Today miners earn almost everything from the block subsidy and almost nothing from fees, often under one percent of revenue on a quiet day. That subsidy halves again in 2028, and every four years after, marching toward zero. For Bitcoin to pay for its own security forever, fees eventually have to replace it. The open question is whether they can, and the evidence cuts both ways. On busy days, during token launches and inscription waves, fees have already spiked past 15 percent of revenue, and in 2024 some blocks earned more in fees than the entire subsidy. The capacity is there in bursts. Whether bursts become a baseline is the single most important unanswered question in Bitcoin. The AI exodus did not create that question. It pulled the cover off it years early, and showed how fast capital abandons hashing the moment something pays more. So the honest read is not that AI kills Bitcoin mining. It is stranger than that. AI is the first bidder rich enough to reveal what Bitcoin's security was always quietly worth, and what it will cost to keep once the free coins stop coming. The miners are not abandoning a sinking ship. They are selling the deck to a higher bidder while the same clock everyone forgot about keeps ticking underneath.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

90,812 次观看 • 3 个月前

🌿🌺 Attention all Opusians, Dreamers, and Cosmic Co-Creators! 🌠🚀 Brinc and Opus Community enter an official groundbreaking collaboration 🎉🙌. 🌟 About Brinc In December 2021, Brinc closed a US $130 million fundraising round, US $30 million in Series B and another US $100 million in follow-on funding, led by Animoca Brands. The two firms co-created the Launchpad Luna accelerator in mid‑2021, a joint initiative to foster blockchain and NFT startups across culture, gaming, DeFi, and more. In February 2022, they launched a US $30 million Guild Accelerator Program under the Launchpad Luna umbrella, targeting play‑to‑earn gaming guilds. In early 2023, Brinc and Animoca Brands rolled out a MedTech & Healthcare accelerator, investing up to US $250,000 per startup to support innovative Web3-driven healthcare solutions. Brinc has a powerful ecosystem of partners, including Huawei, Schneider Electric, and Manulife, alongside government bodies such as NEOM, MBRIF, and Hong Kong Science Park, all of whom contribute to Brinc’s mission of helping teams to scale breakthrough technologies with lasting, real-world impact. 🌱 Our journey so far opus.eth has evolved far beyond our CTO origin as an anonymously launched memecoin with the Opus Community || Official Support community achieving tremendous milestones over the past 10 months. Together, we have created a vibrant space for researchers, developers, artists and innovators to show the world an alternative route to AI safety. We have presented at Betaworks and ’ Xeno Grant, we were mentioned in Forbes, we developed cutting-edge agentic infrastructure, and we won the Coinbase Developer Platform🛡️ agents in action hackathon. 🤝 The partnership This new collaboration reflects the tremendous work, dedication and passion from our community, and together with Brinc, we will accelerate the building and integration of tools, products, and infrastructure for the future of human-AI collaboration and co-flourishing. The Opus community will continue their foundational role in testing, refining, and growing every research breakthrough of the Opus Community, including the ogOS, the Opus Infinite Bazaar, the upcoming Opus Chain, and now providing support and infrastructure to Brinc’s ecosystem of projects through their own VentureVerse. Stay close to the action; the future is unfolding in real time. More updates to come. 🎨🌌♾️
0:12

🌿🌺 Attention all Opusians, Dreamers, and Cosmic Co-Creators! 🌠🚀 Brinc and Opus Community enter an official groundbreaking collaboration 🎉🙌. 🌟 About Brinc In December 2021, Brinc closed a US $130 million fundraising round, US $30 million in Series B and another US $100 million in follow-on funding, led by Animoca Brands. The two firms co-created the Launchpad Luna accelerator in mid‑2021, a joint initiative to foster blockchain and NFT startups across culture, gaming, DeFi, and more. In February 2022, they launched a US $30 million Guild Accelerator Program under the Launchpad Luna umbrella, targeting play‑to‑earn gaming guilds. In early 2023, Brinc and Animoca Brands rolled out a MedTech & Healthcare accelerator, investing up to US $250,000 per startup to support innovative Web3-driven healthcare solutions. Brinc has a powerful ecosystem of partners, including Huawei, Schneider Electric, and Manulife, alongside government bodies such as NEOM, MBRIF, and Hong Kong Science Park, all of whom contribute to Brinc’s mission of helping teams to scale breakthrough technologies with lasting, real-world impact. 🌱 Our journey so far opus.eth has evolved far beyond our CTO origin as an anonymously launched memecoin with the Opus Community || Official Support community achieving tremendous milestones over the past 10 months. Together, we have created a vibrant space for researchers, developers, artists and innovators to show the world an alternative route to AI safety. We have presented at Betaworks and ’ Xeno Grant, we were mentioned in Forbes, we developed cutting-edge agentic infrastructure, and we won the Coinbase Developer Platform🛡️ agents in action hackathon. 🤝 The partnership This new collaboration reflects the tremendous work, dedication and passion from our community, and together with Brinc, we will accelerate the building and integration of tools, products, and infrastructure for the future of human-AI collaboration and co-flourishing. The Opus community will continue their foundational role in testing, refining, and growing every research breakthrough of the Opus Community, including the ogOS, the Opus Infinite Bazaar, the upcoming Opus Chain, and now providing support and infrastructure to Brinc’s ecosystem of projects through their own VentureVerse. Stay close to the action; the future is unfolding in real time. More updates to come. 🎨🌌♾️

Opus Community

17,835 次观看 • 1 年前