Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Science Cannot Account for Everything! #Apologetics #Science

71,876 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

SpeakFreely's profile picture
SpeakFreely2 years ago

Here's one of my all time favorites mentioned in my previous comment. This is just priceless. And I've always noted the change to humility on Dr. Craig's face after the crowd laughs at Wolpert. Dr. Craig seems to try not to share in shaming Wolpert and that has always stuck with me.

SpeakFreely's profile picture
SpeakFreely2 years ago

One of my all time favorite Dr. Craig clips. I also love the one with him and Dr. Lewis Wolpert when Wolpert appealed to a "special computer" as cause of the universe. Wolpert quickly regretted his appeal. But just look how Dr. Craig calls to memory the points he made in reply here to Atkins. It's such a wonderful example to all of us to put in time and effort in having good answers in response to people for the hope we have in Jesus as LORD.

John's profile picture
John2 years ago

So what? That doesn’t automatically mean that a god did it.

Reconciled Sinner's profile picture
Reconciled Sinner2 years ago

Science can only address the reproducible portion of reality. The following topics are not reproducible - the origin of the universe - the origin of life - the origin of all biological diversity of life That doesn't stop some from pushing their atheist religion+calling it science

Con Un Drum's profile picture
Con Un Drum2 years ago

How silly! Science knows a billionth of the actual facts out there.. but religion knows zero! This is god of the gaps on some crack steroids!

MilaZ (milaz.bsky.social)'s profile picture
MilaZ (milaz.bsky.social)2 years ago

Science doesn't prove everything, religion doesn't prove anything. Btw: it's mostly non-scientists making knowledge claims about science.

Whats in a name?'s profile picture
Whats in a name?2 years ago

“Everything” is a big term. I would prefer to say that, while I don’t expect science to account for everything, (i.e. meaning) I wouldn’t trust anything that was contradicted by science/evidence. I believe even Michio Kaku said the theory of everything wouldn’t provide meaning.

Johnny5's profile picture
Johnny52 years ago

But it can account for a while helluva lot more than blind faith of religionists. Science: Here’s our receipts Theists: Uh, our printer is out of paper

Raymond Luxury Yacht's profile picture
Raymond Luxury Yacht2 years ago

Proofs are for math and logic. Science can tell you what the evidence supports and which sorts of evidence are objectively better vis-à-vis predictive validity and explanatory power.

The Misanthropic Buddha 🇺🇸's profile picture
The Misanthropic Buddha 🇺🇸2 years ago

Doesn’t claim to.

Related Videos