Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

‼️ SC/ST Act se problem kya hai? ‼️ Immediate arrest. No inquiry. No anticipatory bail. FIR = jail same day. Personal fight? Land dispute? Office fight? Just add caste name. Done. Case registered. You are criminal. 90% cases later collapse. But by then your job, reputation, family already finished.... show more

Mr Parle G

5,658 subscribers

35,918 views • 18 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

28 Comments

Human. ❤️or RT is to promote discussion17 days ago

.

Brahmin (GC) Political Party17 days ago

19% oppressing 81% legally

b +ve17 days ago

Also in false cases complainant doesn't gives back the money, no case is regd for false accusations. Ideally he should be hanged till death for false cases which ruins a innocent family's lives.

Real Secular17 days ago

Immediate arrest has been squashed by @SCJudgments @indSupremeCourt , but #BanarasiThug @narendramodi brought it back by ordinance. Most heinous crime he did it humanity. Crime is crime why award acuser here @PMOIndia @NITIAayog ? Take care of it @NobelPrize ...!

Wishdhar17 days ago

The next amendment @narendramodi must make is to pull out family members govt employees elected reps parties in land dispute or sale purchase agreement of any kind public servants Sr. citizens Phy mentally infirm Sadhus Docs teerthyatris Media men CA Lawyer out of SCST Att. act.

Vinod17 days ago

Remove sc/st act

Pawan Prashad17 days ago

sahi ek act Aisa bhi pass hona chahie agar Kisi Ne janbujhkar SC ST lagwaya hai to Nirdosh sabit hone per use per manhani ka case lagna chahie aur use bhi jail mein jana padega kyunki usne ek Nirdosh vyakti ko fasaya hai

kirbyderby17 days ago

Systematic discrimination against GCs is happening since 70+ years. Rationality and right to equality has been put down the drain.

kiran17 days ago

Human Rights Commission @India_NHRC must ensure the protection of the human rights of persons belonging to general categories. Constitution applies equally to everyone. SC/ST Act is a draconian law, it must be amended.@KanoongoPriyank @SudhanshuTrived

Swayam Prakash17 days ago

यही नहीं, फर्जी केस करने वाले के परिवार के सारे सरकारी अनुदान बंद होने चाहिए.. उस केस में अनुसंधान कर्ता के उपर भी कार्रवाई सुनिश्चित होनी चाहिए।।

Bhagavatpada17 days ago

Your Govt @narendramodi is answerable for bringing such atrocious draconian Acts. Shame on @BJP4India ! @myogiadityanath @AshwiniUpadhyay @Vishnu_Jain1 @hindufund_ @ajeetbharti

Human. ❤️or RT is to promote discussion17 days ago

.

Human. ❤️or RT is to promote discussion17 days ago

.

Abhay17 days ago

The biggest problem with the criminal justice system in India is the lack of time-bound resolutions by the courts. There are no adequate safeguards to protect an accused person’s life, job, and reputation—especially in false cases. Furthermore, there is no proportionate compensation for the wrongly accused, and no automatic perjury charges are filed against those making false allegations. In a nutshell, the absence of a fixed timeframe for justice turns every legal case into an endless, bleeding wound. Under these circumstances, "We, the People," who originally enacted the Constitution, are reduced to servants, while civil servants become the absolute masters of our lives.

N.Sunil Kumar16 days ago

A lawyer will come one day to challenge and punish the guilty strip them off their ill gotten compensations

Avidviewr17 days ago

Then why not arresting rahul gandhi?

Mirunalini M18 days ago

Wowww 90%? Is there real proof to these claims ?

kiran17 days ago

@blsanthosh SC/ST needs to be Amended It's an a human rights issue for General Category

RaviM17 days ago

@subhash_kak PM is responsible for strengthening SC ST act. Shame.

Rajendra k. Gautam17 days ago

जाति पात को रोकने का सबसे बेस्ट सॉल्यूशन है।

Rakesh Kumar Giri16 days ago

जो प्रजा है जैसे लोहार बड़ाई नायि कुम्हार ,इनको dalit सताने है

Megha16 days ago

There shud b a complimentary exactly same “brahmin” act too..

Surendra Kumar17 days ago

स्वामी विवेकानन्द जी ने सही कहा था . पंडितों से की जिन दिन लोगो को तुम्हारी राजनीति और नक़ली पंडितायी समझ में आने लगेगी उस दिन तुम ख़ुद इस जातिवादी ब्यबस्था में उलझ के रह जाओगे और को बचा भी नहीं पायेगा ये तुम्हारा बनाया हुआ फर्जी जातिबाद सिस्टम!

आरक्षण हटाओ, देश बचाओ 🕵🏻‍♀️ बंधुओं17 days ago

मोदी जी @narendramodi को SC/ST एक्ट को और और मजबूत करके इसमें फाँसी का प्रावधान लाना चाहिए ताकि #स्वर्ण समाज को जल्दी निपटाया जा सके। हो सके तो सवर्णों पर #ScSTact लगते ही तुरंत गोली मारने का shoot and sight order जारी होनी चाहिए, जांच वगैरह बाद में होता रहेगा! हिसाब चुकता fast

Kumar14 days ago

We cancelled our trip to India We don’t want go Indian jail Fuck Modi We will show middle finger to Modi if he comes here

syed abbas سید عباس17 days ago

Why can't @UnreservedMERIT @talk2anuradha and top lawyers file a case against this as this act is against the fundamental principles of constitution "Equality of law". Guilty till proven innocent.

Chanakya17 days ago

Ab ye sab nautanki khatm na hui to congress aur sapa ko laenge, hum to rele ja hi rahe, kam se kam wo bjp walo ko bi relenge, badla lenge tab hamare dil ko sakoon milega.

vijay17 days ago

There is widespread misuse of this law to settle personal vendetta. Many times unrelated person names are put in case. Nobody should be arrested without evidence.

Related Videos

‼️ Look at the mindset ‼️ A man publicly says: “Make a law so that every 16-year-old Brahmin girl is forced to sleep with SC/ST/OBC boys for ‘shuddhi karan’.” If the same line was said about SC/ST or OBC girls, >> SC-ST Act, POCSO, women’s organisations, police, media, everything would have been activated within hours. But when Brahmin girls are targeted like this, most stay silent. >> No “Brahmin Atrocities Act”. >> No special protection. >> No outrage. Same country. Same Constitution. One side gets instant law and protection. Other side gets open calls for se*ual “purification” of their minor girls. This is not equality. This is open targeting with zero fear. People with this mindset don’t need debate, They need jail.

‼️ Look at the mindset ‼️ A man publicly says: “Make a law so that every 16-year-old Brahmin girl is forced to sleep with SC/ST/OBC boys for ‘shuddhi karan’.” If the same line was said about SC/ST or OBC girls, >> SC-ST Act, POCSO, women’s organisations, police, media, everything would have been activated within hours. But when Brahmin girls are targeted like this, most stay silent. >> No “Brahmin Atrocities Act”. >> No special protection. >> No outrage. Same country. Same Constitution. One side gets instant law and protection. Other side gets open calls for se*ual “purification” of their minor girls. This is not equality. This is open targeting with zero fear. People with this mindset don’t need debate, They need jail.

RHA Reforms

61,779 views • 1 month ago

‼️ Reject a Dalit proposal or say no to “be my girlfriend” and SC-ST Act is ready the same night. ‼️ >> No inquiry, direct FIR, jail threat. >> SRCC girl said no, paid 50 thousand settlement, boy still free. >> IAS openly says reservation should stay till Brahmin gives daughter to his son and still sits on chair with zero action. Tomorrow your son or daughter in college or office doesn’t work, no promotion, no hike, one angry FIR and life is finished. 8 lakh instant cash for filing, even if case is fake money never comes back. This is not protection, this is licensed blackmail. Whole society now scared to even open mouth for their own children. Caste card became the new weapon. Merit, consent, truth all secondary.

‼️ Reject a Dalit proposal or say no to “be my girlfriend” and SC-ST Act is ready the same night. ‼️ >> No inquiry, direct FIR, jail threat. >> SRCC girl said no, paid 50 thousand settlement, boy still free. >> IAS openly says reservation should stay till Brahmin gives daughter to his son and still sits on chair with zero action. Tomorrow your son or daughter in college or office doesn’t work, no promotion, no hike, one angry FIR and life is finished. 8 lakh instant cash for filing, even if case is fake money never comes back. This is not protection, this is licensed blackmail. Whole society now scared to even open mouth for their own children. Caste card became the new weapon. Merit, consent, truth all secondary.

Mr Parle G

16,664 views • 3 days ago

Armed Driver Gets Shot By Carjacker, Then This Happened! A man in West Philly was carjacked and shot around seven in the morning. Then he returned fire. That matters because every time one of these stories comes up, somebody says the same thing: “Just give them what they want.” But based on how this carjacking unfolded, there was no clean window for compliance. The gun came out, the driver was already shot, and now the only thing between him and whatever came next was whether he had the ability to fight back. Compliance is not a contract. There is no rule that says if you hand over the keys, the person robbing you at gunpoint is obligated to let you live. A gun does not guarantee you go home. It does not make you bulletproof. There are absolutely moments where drawing is the wrong move. But this man was shot first, still armed, and still in the fight. That is the whole argument.

Armed Driver Gets Shot By Carjacker, Then This Happened! A man in West Philly was carjacked and shot around seven in the morning. Then he returned fire. That matters because every time one of these stories comes up, somebody says the same thing: “Just give them what they want.” But based on how this carjacking unfolded, there was no clean window for compliance. The gun came out, the driver was already shot, and now the only thing between him and whatever came next was whether he had the ability to fight back. Compliance is not a contract. There is no rule that says if you hand over the keys, the person robbing you at gunpoint is obligated to let you live. A gun does not guarantee you go home. It does not make you bulletproof. There are absolutely moments where drawing is the wrong move. But this man was shot first, still armed, and still in the fight. That is the whole argument.

Colion Noir

23,541 views • 22 days ago

🚨 JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE HIS DWI ARREST BODY CAM FOOTAGE — AND HE’S SUING TO STOP IT Let that sink in. Arrested for DWI. Released WITHOUT posting bail. Walked out the same night. Now he’s in court fighting to keep the footage sealed. His filing says releasing it would cause “severe and irreparable harm” to his reputation… trigger “public ridicule”… and serve “no legitimate public interest.” No legitimate public interest? When normal people get arrested, there’s no reputation shield. No embarrassment exemption. No celebrity privacy bubble. The footage comes out. The mugshot circulates. Life goes on. He received 25 hours of community service. A $500 fine. A 90 day license suspension. And issued a polished statement ending with: “Even if you just have one drink, don’t get behind the wheel.” But now the camera is the problem. If it’s routine… why seal it? If it’s harmless… why sue? This isn’t about drama. It’s about whether the rules apply the same way to everyone. Release it — or explain why it’s different. If this were you… would the footage already be everywhere?

🚨 JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE HIS DWI ARREST BODY CAM FOOTAGE — AND HE’S SUING TO STOP IT Let that sink in. Arrested for DWI. Released WITHOUT posting bail. Walked out the same night. Now he’s in court fighting to keep the footage sealed. His filing says releasing it would cause “severe and irreparable harm” to his reputation… trigger “public ridicule”… and serve “no legitimate public interest.” No legitimate public interest? When normal people get arrested, there’s no reputation shield. No embarrassment exemption. No celebrity privacy bubble. The footage comes out. The mugshot circulates. Life goes on. He received 25 hours of community service. A $500 fine. A 90 day license suspension. And issued a polished statement ending with: “Even if you just have one drink, don’t get behind the wheel.” But now the camera is the problem. If it’s routine… why seal it? If it’s harmless… why sue? This isn’t about drama. It’s about whether the rules apply the same way to everyone. Release it — or explain why it’s different. If this were you… would the footage already be everywhere?

HustleBitch

129,979 views • 6 months ago

Most people think hardware wallets are only for crypto traders. That’s surface-level thinking. A device like OneKey is really about one thing, - Control. You worked for your money. Why leave the door open? With a hardware wallet; ✔️Your assets are offline ✔️No random app, no hacker, no phishing link gets access ✔️You’re not waking up to “unauthorized transactions” Simple. This is not just storage. This is asset protection at the highest level‼️ Because the real problem is not making money… It’s keeping it. After grinding to earn, the last thing you want is to start from zero because of one mistake or one breach. Smart people don’t wait for losses before they upgrade security. They position early. Secure your assets properly today👇🏼 Get yours now: Code: Z07K0M 10% off. No excuses.

Most people think hardware wallets are only for crypto traders. That’s surface-level thinking. A device like OneKey is really about one thing, - Control. You worked for your money. Why leave the door open? With a hardware wallet; ✔️Your assets are offline ✔️No random app, no hacker, no phishing link gets access ✔️You’re not waking up to “unauthorized transactions” Simple. This is not just storage. This is asset protection at the highest level‼️ Because the real problem is not making money… It’s keeping it. After grinding to earn, the last thing you want is to start from zero because of one mistake or one breach. Smart people don’t wait for losses before they upgrade security. They position early. Secure your assets properly today👇🏼 Get yours now: Code: Z07K0M 10% off. No excuses.

Techriz💯📈

41,040 views • 5 months ago

Jensen Huang just drew a line through the entire global workforce. One sentence. No ambiguity. Huang: “If your job is the task, then you’re very highly going to be disrupted.” Not might be. Not eventually. Very highly going to be. That single distinction between a job and a task is the most important career diagnosis anyone will hear this decade. If you show up every day to execute a repeatable process, you are the process. And the machine runs processes better than you. Faster. Cheaper. Without breaks. Without errors. Without a salary negotiation. The moment your role can be written as a checklist, the checklist gets automated. And your desk gets cleared. That is not a warning about the future. That is a description of what is already underway. But Huang did not stop at the diagnosis. He handed you the prescription in the same breath. Huang: “If your job’s purpose includes you certain tasks, then it is vital that you go learn how to use AI to automate those tasks.” Your job includes tasks. But your job is not the tasks. Your job is the judgment around them. The decisions. The context. The instinct for why the work matters and what to do when everything breaks. That stays human. Everything else gets handed to the machine. And the person who hands it over first does not lose their job. They become more valuable than everyone still doing it by hand. Because they just converted every hour they used to spend on execution into hours spent thinking. The accountant who automates data entry does not get replaced. They become the strategist who used to be buried in spreadsheets. The marketer who automates reporting does not get fired. They become the creative who used to be trapped building dashboards. The person who refuses to automate anything becomes the most expensive way to do the cheapest work. Huang: “It is the case that the technology will dislocate and will eliminate many tasks. And because it will automate it.” No softening. No hopeful footnote. Dislocation is coming. Tasks will be eliminated. That part is settled. The only open question is which side of that line you are standing on. The side that lost the tasks. Or the side that gave them away on purpose and kept the work that actually matters. One side gets disrupted. The other side gets dangerous. The gap between those two outcomes is not talent. Not credentials. Not experience. It is whether you learned to use the machine before the machine learned to replace you. That window is still open. It is closing faster than most people are willing to believe. And it does not reopen.

Jensen Huang just drew a line through the entire global workforce. One sentence. No ambiguity. Huang: “If your job is the task, then you’re very highly going to be disrupted.” Not might be. Not eventually. Very highly going to be. That single distinction between a job and a task is the most important career diagnosis anyone will hear this decade. If you show up every day to execute a repeatable process, you are the process. And the machine runs processes better than you. Faster. Cheaper. Without breaks. Without errors. Without a salary negotiation. The moment your role can be written as a checklist, the checklist gets automated. And your desk gets cleared. That is not a warning about the future. That is a description of what is already underway. But Huang did not stop at the diagnosis. He handed you the prescription in the same breath. Huang: “If your job’s purpose includes you certain tasks, then it is vital that you go learn how to use AI to automate those tasks.” Your job includes tasks. But your job is not the tasks. Your job is the judgment around them. The decisions. The context. The instinct for why the work matters and what to do when everything breaks. That stays human. Everything else gets handed to the machine. And the person who hands it over first does not lose their job. They become more valuable than everyone still doing it by hand. Because they just converted every hour they used to spend on execution into hours spent thinking. The accountant who automates data entry does not get replaced. They become the strategist who used to be buried in spreadsheets. The marketer who automates reporting does not get fired. They become the creative who used to be trapped building dashboards. The person who refuses to automate anything becomes the most expensive way to do the cheapest work. Huang: “It is the case that the technology will dislocate and will eliminate many tasks. And because it will automate it.” No softening. No hopeful footnote. Dislocation is coming. Tasks will be eliminated. That part is settled. The only open question is which side of that line you are standing on. The side that lost the tasks. Or the side that gave them away on purpose and kept the work that actually matters. One side gets disrupted. The other side gets dangerous. The gap between those two outcomes is not talent. Not credentials. Not experience. It is whether you learned to use the machine before the machine learned to replace you. That window is still open. It is closing faster than most people are willing to believe. And it does not reopen.

Dustin

142,659 views • 5 months ago

Respan Launch Week, Day 2: Evals Evals are one of the hardest parts of building AI applications. It is not because teams cannot run them. It is because they are hard to structure, hard to compare, and even harder to improve over time. So teams end up guessing. Did this prompt actually get better? Is this model really an improvement? We built Evals in Respan to make this systematic. You define: - what you want to test, such as prompts, models, or configs - the dataset, from production logs or test cases - the evaluators, whether LLM, code, human, or a mix Then you run experiments and compare results side by side. Same inputs. Same evaluation. Clear answers. No more guessing. Start running your first eval.

Respan Launch Week, Day 2: Evals Evals are one of the hardest parts of building AI applications. It is not because teams cannot run them. It is because they are hard to structure, hard to compare, and even harder to improve over time. So teams end up guessing. Did this prompt actually get better? Is this model really an improvement? We built Evals in Respan to make this systematic. You define: - what you want to test, such as prompts, models, or configs - the dataset, from production logs or test cases - the evaluators, whether LLM, code, human, or a mix Then you run experiments and compare results side by side. Same inputs. Same evaluation. Clear answers. No more guessing. Start running your first eval.

Respan

127,680 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: New Jersey governor candidate Jack Ciattarelli promises to ABOLISH sanctuary cities and end CASHLESS BAIL if elected on Tuesday "Executive order number one on day one? No town in this state will be a sanctuary city and we will not be a sanctuary state." 🔥🔥 "Many of the things that Murphy has done are by executive order. They weren't codified by the legislature, which means I can reverse them on day one." "But having sanctuary cities and us being a sanctuary state encourages illegal immigration and it handcuffs our local police in certain ways. We're not doing that." "I'm gonna reverse that on day one. If a local police chief and mayor wanna work together to preserve safety of your community by partnering with a federal agency, I'm not gonna get in the way. We're not doing that. But the other thing we're gonna do is get rid of cashless bail." "Cashless bail has created a professional criminal who's learned how to game the system. Talk to your local cops and they'll tell you about this dynamic known as arrest, release, repeat. It's demoralizing for cops." FLIP NJ RED!

🚨 BREAKING: New Jersey governor candidate Jack Ciattarelli promises to ABOLISH sanctuary cities and end CASHLESS BAIL if elected on Tuesday "Executive order number one on day one? No town in this state will be a sanctuary city and we will not be a sanctuary state." 🔥🔥 "Many of the things that Murphy has done are by executive order. They weren't codified by the legislature, which means I can reverse them on day one." "But having sanctuary cities and us being a sanctuary state encourages illegal immigration and it handcuffs our local police in certain ways. We're not doing that." "I'm gonna reverse that on day one. If a local police chief and mayor wanna work together to preserve safety of your community by partnering with a federal agency, I'm not gonna get in the way. We're not doing that. But the other thing we're gonna do is get rid of cashless bail." "Cashless bail has created a professional criminal who's learned how to game the system. Talk to your local cops and they'll tell you about this dynamic known as arrest, release, repeat. It's demoralizing for cops." FLIP NJ RED!

Eric Daugherty

224,164 views • 10 months ago

Two men allegedly kicked in his door. One of them brought a gun. The victim reportedly didn’t have one. Then the fight spilled out of the apartment… and one intruder got shot with his own gun. That is the part people need to sit with. The man inside had barricaded the door with a couch. A couch. That tells you he already knew trouble was coming. He already knew the lock might not be enough. But once two grown men kick through your door and end up beating you in your bedroom, the couch has done everything it can do. Now you are gambling with your life. And this man reportedly had to fight for a gun that did not even belong to him. So before anybody says, “See, he didn’t need to be armed,” no. He survived because he was desperate and the other guy was sloppy. That is not a plan. That is luck with blood on it. Be honest: If you knew trouble was coming, would you trust a couch to be your plan?

Two men allegedly kicked in his door. One of them brought a gun. The victim reportedly didn’t have one. Then the fight spilled out of the apartment… and one intruder got shot with his own gun. That is the part people need to sit with. The man inside had barricaded the door with a couch. A couch. That tells you he already knew trouble was coming. He already knew the lock might not be enough. But once two grown men kick through your door and end up beating you in your bedroom, the couch has done everything it can do. Now you are gambling with your life. And this man reportedly had to fight for a gun that did not even belong to him. So before anybody says, “See, he didn’t need to be armed,” no. He survived because he was desperate and the other guy was sloppy. That is not a plan. That is luck with blood on it. Be honest: If you knew trouble was coming, would you trust a couch to be your plan?

Colion Noir

20,972 views • 3 days ago

This past Thursday, Brian Hooker, PhD described getting the results back from his son's hair-metal test. Holding that paper from the doctor's office, and crumpling down on the bathroom floor and sobbing. Because you cannot unvaccinate your child. Once that vaccine is in, it's in. And with the vaccine policy the way it has been, no one gets a pass. There is damage done to every single child, whether you recognize it or not. That's not easy to say or easy to hear. Dr. Hooker says that if we can prevent even one family from living through what so many families already have, that's a good day. That's why this fight never stops.

This past Thursday, Brian Hooker, PhD described getting the results back from his son's hair-metal test. Holding that paper from the doctor's office, and crumpling down on the bathroom floor and sobbing. Because you cannot unvaccinate your child. Once that vaccine is in, it's in. And with the vaccine policy the way it has been, no one gets a pass. There is damage done to every single child, whether you recognize it or not. That's not easy to say or easy to hear. Dr. Hooker says that if we can prevent even one family from living through what so many families already have, that's a good day. That's why this fight never stops.

The HighWire

23,161 views • 6 months ago

I had a student. SC/ST case was filed against his entire family. His neighbourhood people had ensured that none of these people would get a government job. And that boy was 17 years old at that time. That’s why he was saved. Then after that he turned 18, so he got selected in RPF. And in that he did not mention this thing. So when the police verification comes, after that his name was removed because you had hidden it. Now at that time, after getting the government job, it got cancelled. Then he got selected in CHSL. In CHSL he mentioned that there is this case against me. Then after that he got selected in CGL. When he got selected in CGL, no one in his village knew that he had already got selected in CHSL. He is doing the job. Because the fight was from the neighbourhood itself. So that no other case happens again. And when he came to know that it has happened in his case, then those people went again. By that time this entire family had already left the village.

I had a student. SC/ST case was filed against his entire family. His neighbourhood people had ensured that none of these people would get a government job. And that boy was 17 years old at that time. That’s why he was saved. Then after that he turned 18, so he got selected in RPF. And in that he did not mention this thing. So when the police verification comes, after that his name was removed because you had hidden it. Now at that time, after getting the government job, it got cancelled. Then he got selected in CHSL. In CHSL he mentioned that there is this case against me. Then after that he got selected in CGL. When he got selected in CGL, no one in his village knew that he had already got selected in CHSL. He is doing the job. Because the fight was from the neighbourhood itself. So that no other case happens again. And when he came to know that it has happened in his case, then those people went again. By that time this entire family had already left the village.

×̷̷͜×̷

78,663 views • 17 days ago

Not for a moment will I ever say that we must not give premium to innocence. Democracy is nurtured, its core values blossom, and human rights are taken at a high pedestal when we believe in innocence till the guilt is established. Therefore, I must not be misunderstood as casting aspersions on any individual. But then, in a democratic nation, purity of its criminal justice system defines its direction. Investigation is required. No investigation under law is in progress at the moment. Because for a criminal investigation, the initiation has to be by an FIR—First Information Report. It is not there. It is the law of the land that every cognizable offence is required to be reported to the police. And failure to do so—failure to report a cognizable offence—is a crime. Therefore, you all will be wondering why there has been no FIR. The answer is simple. An FIR in this country can be registered against anyone—any constitutional functionary, including the one before you. One has only to activate the rule of law. No permission is required. But if it is judges—FIR cannot be straightaway registered. It has to be approved by the concerned in judiciary. But that is not given in the Constitution. The Constitution of India has accorded immunity from prosecution only to the Hon'ble President and the Hon'ble Governors. So how come a category beyond law has secured this immunity? Because the ill-effects of this are being felt in the mind of one and all. Every Indian, young and old, is deeply concerned. If the event had taken place at his house, the speed would have been an electronic rocket. Now, it is not even a cattle cart. #RajyaSabha

Not for a moment will I ever say that we must not give premium to innocence. Democracy is nurtured, its core values blossom, and human rights are taken at a high pedestal when we believe in innocence till the guilt is established. Therefore, I must not be misunderstood as casting aspersions on any individual. But then, in a democratic nation, purity of its criminal justice system defines its direction. Investigation is required. No investigation under law is in progress at the moment. Because for a criminal investigation, the initiation has to be by an FIR—First Information Report. It is not there. It is the law of the land that every cognizable offence is required to be reported to the police. And failure to do so—failure to report a cognizable offence—is a crime. Therefore, you all will be wondering why there has been no FIR. The answer is simple. An FIR in this country can be registered against anyone—any constitutional functionary, including the one before you. One has only to activate the rule of law. No permission is required. But if it is judges—FIR cannot be straightaway registered. It has to be approved by the concerned in judiciary. But that is not given in the Constitution. The Constitution of India has accorded immunity from prosecution only to the Hon'ble President and the Hon'ble Governors. So how come a category beyond law has secured this immunity? Because the ill-effects of this are being felt in the mind of one and all. Every Indian, young and old, is deeply concerned. If the event had taken place at his house, the speed would have been an electronic rocket. Now, it is not even a cattle cart. #RajyaSabha

Vice-President of India

95,655 views • 1 year ago

This teacher was in her 28th year of teaching. One day she took a Monster drink away from a female student because they are not allowed to have those in class. That same female student later on accused the teacher of inappropriately touching her. The teacher was put on administrative leave because of that Title 6 complaint. The female student’s mother, who works in the central office, dropped the complaint. Fortunately, there are cameras in the classroom. The day of the supposed incident, the teacher wasn’t even working that day because of her mother’s recent death. The cameras found no evidence of inappropriateness. But here is the kicker. Besides removing that student from this teacher’s classroom, nothing happened to her. No suspension, no expulsion, no punishment, no consequences whatsoever. Nothing was done and that is what the problem is in this day and age. No consequences for children. That student should have received a suspension at the very least. I would even go so far to say she should have been expelled from that school. Even with the truth coming out, sometimes the damage is already done. What would you have done if you were this teacher? Can’t sue the child, sue the parents maybe? What are her options?

This teacher was in her 28th year of teaching. One day she took a Monster drink away from a female student because they are not allowed to have those in class. That same female student later on accused the teacher of inappropriately touching her. The teacher was put on administrative leave because of that Title 6 complaint. The female student’s mother, who works in the central office, dropped the complaint. Fortunately, there are cameras in the classroom. The day of the supposed incident, the teacher wasn’t even working that day because of her mother’s recent death. The cameras found no evidence of inappropriateness. But here is the kicker. Besides removing that student from this teacher’s classroom, nothing happened to her. No suspension, no expulsion, no punishment, no consequences whatsoever. Nothing was done and that is what the problem is in this day and age. No consequences for children. That student should have received a suspension at the very least. I would even go so far to say she should have been expelled from that school. Even with the truth coming out, sometimes the damage is already done. What would you have done if you were this teacher? Can’t sue the child, sue the parents maybe? What are her options?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,103,308 views • 3 months ago

Bull Armory built a gun that feels like it stopped respecting recoil. This Tac Comp has V6 porting and a compensator machined into the barrel. Ports first. Comp second. Recoil basically gets jumped in an alley before the gun even has a chance to move. And that’s the wild part. The gun barely moves. The only real “problem” is the concussion. It barks. You feel the blast. But after shooting it for a while, I realized the only reason I noticed the concussion so much is because the gun gives you almost nothing else to feel. No real flip. No real rise. No real shove. Just flat. Stupid flat. Texas flat. And under $3,000, this thing is clearly walking into the Staccato XC conversation with a lot of confidence. So now I want to hear from y’all: Is Bull Armory becoming one of the best values in the 2011 world… Or are you still taking the Staccato XC? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who thinks ports and comps on the same gun is doing too much.

Bull Armory built a gun that feels like it stopped respecting recoil. This Tac Comp has V6 porting and a compensator machined into the barrel. Ports first. Comp second. Recoil basically gets jumped in an alley before the gun even has a chance to move. And that’s the wild part. The gun barely moves. The only real “problem” is the concussion. It barks. You feel the blast. But after shooting it for a while, I realized the only reason I noticed the concussion so much is because the gun gives you almost nothing else to feel. No real flip. No real rise. No real shove. Just flat. Stupid flat. Texas flat. And under $3,000, this thing is clearly walking into the Staccato XC conversation with a lot of confidence. So now I want to hear from y’all: Is Bull Armory becoming one of the best values in the 2011 world… Or are you still taking the Staccato XC? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who thinks ports and comps on the same gun is doing too much.

Colion Noir

65,148 views • 2 months ago

I Stand With Swatantra Bhardwaj 🐯🔥 As an advocate, I have a genuine legal question regarding the Swatantra Bhardwaj case. Under Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), an act done in exercise of the right of private defence is not an offence. Sections 35–40 further define when and to what extent this right can be exercised. So, if the factual defence is that the accused acted in lawful private defence, that defence necessarily requires examination before concluding criminal liability. But here is the important legal question: If the underlying act is ultimately found to be protected by lawful private defence, what is the legal basis for sustaining an offence under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act? The SC/ST Act does not make every dispute or assault involving an SC/ST person automatically an offence under the Act. The specific ingredients of the relevant provision must be satisfied. Therefore, the questions for investigation and ultimately the Court are: What specific offence under Section 3 of the SC/ST Act is alleged? What are the factual ingredients supporting that particular provision? Was the alleged act committed with the requisite caste-related intent/knowledge, where required? Was there an immediate threat giving rise to a lawful right of private defence? Was the force used proportionate to the threat, or did it exceed the limits prescribed by law? A claim of self-defence is not an automatic acquittal, but equally, registration/invocation of the SC/ST Act cannot substitute for proving the statutory ingredients of the offence. And most importantly, for every citizen: If you get into a physical dispute with anyone, including a person belonging to SC/ST, do not assume that you have no right to defend yourself. But do not use excessive force either. Preserve CCTV/video evidence, identify independent witnesses, seek medical examination immediately if injured, make your own complaint/counter-complaint where legally warranted, and consult a criminal lawyer before making statements on social media. The law protects the right of private defence, but only within its statutory limits. Delhi Police Rekha Gupta

I Stand With Swatantra Bhardwaj 🐯🔥 As an advocate, I have a genuine legal question regarding the Swatantra Bhardwaj case. Under Section 34 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), an act done in exercise of the right of private defence is not an offence. Sections 35–40 further define when and to what extent this right can be exercised. So, if the factual defence is that the accused acted in lawful private defence, that defence necessarily requires examination before concluding criminal liability. But here is the important legal question: If the underlying act is ultimately found to be protected by lawful private defence, what is the legal basis for sustaining an offence under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act? The SC/ST Act does not make every dispute or assault involving an SC/ST person automatically an offence under the Act. The specific ingredients of the relevant provision must be satisfied. Therefore, the questions for investigation and ultimately the Court are: What specific offence under Section 3 of the SC/ST Act is alleged? What are the factual ingredients supporting that particular provision? Was the alleged act committed with the requisite caste-related intent/knowledge, where required? Was there an immediate threat giving rise to a lawful right of private defence? Was the force used proportionate to the threat, or did it exceed the limits prescribed by law? A claim of self-defence is not an automatic acquittal, but equally, registration/invocation of the SC/ST Act cannot substitute for proving the statutory ingredients of the offence. And most importantly, for every citizen: If you get into a physical dispute with anyone, including a person belonging to SC/ST, do not assume that you have no right to defend yourself. But do not use excessive force either. Preserve CCTV/video evidence, identify independent witnesses, seek medical examination immediately if injured, make your own complaint/counter-complaint where legally warranted, and consult a criminal lawyer before making statements on social media. The law protects the right of private defence, but only within its statutory limits. Delhi Police Rekha Gupta

ADV. ASHUTOSH J. DUBEY 🇮🇳

24,923 views • 15 days ago

🚨CAUGHT THEM !!! Listen carefully, because this matters. A man was taken under a psychiatric hold — what’s called a 302 in Pennsylvania. That law allows the government to take your liberty immediately, but only under one condition: There must be a documented, factual basis that you are a clear and present danger. Now here’s what the actual record shows. The original 302 — the one used to take him — was blank where it matters. It literally says: “Unknown at this time.” No facts. No threat. No explanation. That means at the moment they took him, there was no documented justification. Then something else happens. When they move to extend his detention under a 303 petition, suddenly there’s a different version of that same document — now filled in, now checked off, now attempting to justify what already happened. Those two documents do not match. That is not a clerical error. That is a timeline problem. Because the law does not allow you to detain someone first and build the justification later. That’s backwards. That’s a due process violation. And if proven, it means the entire detention was unlawful from the start. Now add this: He was not properly notified of the 303 hearing. He was placed in a room on Zoom. He objected on constitutional grounds. And the order was signed anyway. This is exactly why due process exists. Not for perfect cases — but for cases like this. This is not about politics. This is not about opinions. This is about one question: Did the government have a lawful basis to take someone’s liberty at the time they did it? Because if the answer is no — nothing that comes after fixes it. This is not just civil rights violations this is criminal spoliation, and false imprisonment HHS DOJ Civil Rights Division UHS, Inc. Criminal Division Disclosures will be provided to law enforcement #FREESEANCONNOLLY

🚨CAUGHT THEM !!! Listen carefully, because this matters. A man was taken under a psychiatric hold — what’s called a 302 in Pennsylvania. That law allows the government to take your liberty immediately, but only under one condition: There must be a documented, factual basis that you are a clear and present danger. Now here’s what the actual record shows. The original 302 — the one used to take him — was blank where it matters. It literally says: “Unknown at this time.” No facts. No threat. No explanation. That means at the moment they took him, there was no documented justification. Then something else happens. When they move to extend his detention under a 303 petition, suddenly there’s a different version of that same document — now filled in, now checked off, now attempting to justify what already happened. Those two documents do not match. That is not a clerical error. That is a timeline problem. Because the law does not allow you to detain someone first and build the justification later. That’s backwards. That’s a due process violation. And if proven, it means the entire detention was unlawful from the start. Now add this: He was not properly notified of the 303 hearing. He was placed in a room on Zoom. He objected on constitutional grounds. And the order was signed anyway. This is exactly why due process exists. Not for perfect cases — but for cases like this. This is not about politics. This is not about opinions. This is about one question: Did the government have a lawful basis to take someone’s liberty at the time they did it? Because if the answer is no — nothing that comes after fixes it. This is not just civil rights violations this is criminal spoliation, and false imprisonment HHS DOJ Civil Rights Division UHS, Inc. Criminal Division Disclosures will be provided to law enforcement #FREESEANCONNOLLY

Leah Hoopes

66,264 views • 6 months ago

National Day of Presence January 12, 2026 A Video Message to Nigerians This is not a protest. This is not a rally. This is a presence. On January 12, Nigerians across the country will step out peacefully, silently, and lawfully with one demand only. The Tax Act 2025 must be cancelled. There are no organizers. There are no leaders. There are no negotiations. This is not about political parties, unions, or movements. It is about citizens showing up where they already live. Before any government asks for more money, Nigerians are asking a simple question. What has already been done with what was taken. Taxes have been collected. Loans have been taken in the name of the people. Those loans are being repaid by citizens. They have financed politics, not development. Daily life continues to deteriorate. No stable electricity. No clean water. No functional healthcare. Unsafe roads. Insecurity everywhere. This new law goes further by allowing money to be taken first from your bank account and explanations to come later. That is not due process. That is not consent. If the state can debit your account on accusation or error, then you do not truly own your money. The National Day of Presence has one demand. The Tax Act 2025 must be cancelled. No violence. No speeches. No list of demands. January 12 is not optional. Silence today becomes compliance tomorrow. Show up where you live (See Flyer for Location in Your State) Stand quietly. Be counted. Do not come alone. God bless Nigeria.

National Day of Presence January 12, 2026 A Video Message to Nigerians This is not a protest. This is not a rally. This is a presence. On January 12, Nigerians across the country will step out peacefully, silently, and lawfully with one demand only. The Tax Act 2025 must be cancelled. There are no organizers. There are no leaders. There are no negotiations. This is not about political parties, unions, or movements. It is about citizens showing up where they already live. Before any government asks for more money, Nigerians are asking a simple question. What has already been done with what was taken. Taxes have been collected. Loans have been taken in the name of the people. Those loans are being repaid by citizens. They have financed politics, not development. Daily life continues to deteriorate. No stable electricity. No clean water. No functional healthcare. Unsafe roads. Insecurity everywhere. This new law goes further by allowing money to be taken first from your bank account and explanations to come later. That is not due process. That is not consent. If the state can debit your account on accusation or error, then you do not truly own your money. The National Day of Presence has one demand. The Tax Act 2025 must be cancelled. No violence. No speeches. No list of demands. January 12 is not optional. Silence today becomes compliance tomorrow. Show up where you live (See Flyer for Location in Your State) Stand quietly. Be counted. Do not come alone. God bless Nigeria.

iOccupyNigeria

16,606 views • 8 months ago

Let’s be brutally honest. If Democrats ever retake the United States Senate, the filibuster is gone anyway. Day one. No debate. No hesitation. They will pack the Supreme Court, erase every institutional guardrail, and give a Democrat president everything on their radical wish list to permanently reshape this country. And here’s the unforgivable part: while that threat is staring us in the face, President Trump’s America First agenda is dying right now in the United States Senate. Not because Democrats are stopping it, but because weak Republicans are. Republicans like John Cornyn refuse to fight. Refuse to use power. Refuse to do the very thing voters sent them to Washington to do: win. You don’t save the Republic by protecting Senate traditions while the other side burns them down. You save it by acting. By codifying the America First agenda into law now, while we still can. Texas didn’t send a Senator to Washington to manage decline. We sent one to stop it. If you won’t fight when it matters most, step aside. Texas is ready for leadership that will.

Let’s be brutally honest. If Democrats ever retake the United States Senate, the filibuster is gone anyway. Day one. No debate. No hesitation. They will pack the Supreme Court, erase every institutional guardrail, and give a Democrat president everything on their radical wish list to permanently reshape this country. And here’s the unforgivable part: while that threat is staring us in the face, President Trump’s America First agenda is dying right now in the United States Senate. Not because Democrats are stopping it, but because weak Republicans are. Republicans like John Cornyn refuse to fight. Refuse to use power. Refuse to do the very thing voters sent them to Washington to do: win. You don’t save the Republic by protecting Senate traditions while the other side burns them down. You save it by acting. By codifying the America First agenda into law now, while we still can. Texas didn’t send a Senator to Washington to manage decline. We sent one to stop it. If you won’t fight when it matters most, step aside. Texas is ready for leadership that will.

Wesley Hunt

14,690,530 views • 8 months ago

Most of you come into the market every morning already biased. That’s your first mistake‼️ You’re not reacting to price You’re trying to force price to agree with you. And the market punishes that instantly. Here’s the truth: Before you even think of entries, you should already know what price is hunting. Because price doesn’t move randomly It moves to take liquidity, then delivers the real move. So your job every morning is simple: Where are the stops? • Above yesterday’s high? • Below yesterday’s low? • Equal highs/lows sitting clean? That’s the map. Now here’s where people keep messing up: They see price moving and jump in. No patience. No confirmation. Just impulse. Meanwhile, the real move comes AFTER liquidity is taken. That fake move you entered? That was engineered for you. So tighten up your execution: Don’t trade the first move. Don’t chase candles. Don’t assume direction. Wait for: Liquidity sweep → Displacement → Confirmation No sequence = No trade. Simple rule: If price hasn’t taken something, it’s probably going to. And if you’re already in before that happens, you’re the liquidity. This morning, don’t prove anything. Don’t rush anything. Just be sharp enough to recognize when the market is setting the trap… and when it’s finally ready to move. 📈

Most of you come into the market every morning already biased. That’s your first mistake‼️ You’re not reacting to price You’re trying to force price to agree with you. And the market punishes that instantly. Here’s the truth: Before you even think of entries, you should already know what price is hunting. Because price doesn’t move randomly It moves to take liquidity, then delivers the real move. So your job every morning is simple: Where are the stops? • Above yesterday’s high? • Below yesterday’s low? • Equal highs/lows sitting clean? That’s the map. Now here’s where people keep messing up: They see price moving and jump in. No patience. No confirmation. Just impulse. Meanwhile, the real move comes AFTER liquidity is taken. That fake move you entered? That was engineered for you. So tighten up your execution: Don’t trade the first move. Don’t chase candles. Don’t assume direction. Wait for: Liquidity sweep → Displacement → Confirmation No sequence = No trade. Simple rule: If price hasn’t taken something, it’s probably going to. And if you’re already in before that happens, you’re the liquidity. This morning, don’t prove anything. Don’t rush anything. Just be sharp enough to recognize when the market is setting the trap… and when it’s finally ready to move. 📈

Techriz💯📈

45,523 views • 4 months ago

Today, we had a three-hour-long meeting of General Secretaries, in-charges and PCC Presidents. We discussed the issue in Madhya Pradesh regarding the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan ji's nomination. The reason given was that she did not disclose a notice sent by a court. There was no criminal case, no FIR, and no chargesheet against her, yet her nomination was still rejected. On the other hand, in Jharkhand, the BJP-sponsored corporate candidate did not even mention his name properly in the relevant column, but the Returning Officer accepted the nomination. On one side, you rejected the nomination of Meenakshi Natarajan ji in Madhya Pradesh, and on the other, you accepted a nomination with so many discrepancies in the nomination paper. This shows the pathetic condition of Indian democracy. After vote chori, this is now seat chori. In today's meeting, we decided to fight this out legally and politically. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) Shri K C Venugopal

Today, we had a three-hour-long meeting of General Secretaries, in-charges and PCC Presidents. We discussed the issue in Madhya Pradesh regarding the rejection of Meenakshi Natarajan ji's nomination. The reason given was that she did not disclose a notice sent by a court. There was no criminal case, no FIR, and no chargesheet against her, yet her nomination was still rejected. On the other hand, in Jharkhand, the BJP-sponsored corporate candidate did not even mention his name properly in the relevant column, but the Returning Officer accepted the nomination. On one side, you rejected the nomination of Meenakshi Natarajan ji in Madhya Pradesh, and on the other, you accepted a nomination with so many discrepancies in the nomination paper. This shows the pathetic condition of Indian democracy. After vote chori, this is now seat chori. In today's meeting, we decided to fight this out legally and politically. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) Shri K C Venugopal

Congress

51,107 views • 3 months ago