Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨SEC on VAULTS 👀XRPL’s XLS-65/66 will be protocol-native primitives, a real distinction that aids transparency and reduces hidden control risks. Still, off-chain underwriting means securities-law analysis remains relevant. Peirce invites SEC engagement on exactly this. Reality check, not alarm. How does being native help? It embeds the rules (pooling,... show more

🌸Eri ~ Carpe Diem

290,110 subscribers

11,195 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 XRP ARMY – WILL THIS IGNITE THE BULL RUN ?💥 $XRP PRICE EXPLOSION LOADING… Evernorth just dropped the OFFICIAL breakdown of XLS-66 - XRP Ledger’s native lending protocol is here. Single-asset vaults. Term lending with automated repayments. Confidential transfers via zero-knowledge proofs. The ledger itself becomes the contract - no wrapping, no bridging, no taxable events, no unproven smart contracts. $100 BILLION+ in dormant XRP is about to turn into productive, yield-generating capital for institutions. Market makers and collateral managers can now borrow directly on-chain while XRP holders earn real utility yield without ever leaving the XRPL. Exactly what this means for XRP price explosion👇 - Massive on-chain liquidity unlocks > idle XRP becomes high-yield collateral - Institutional demand surges (they’ve been waiting for THIS exact infrastructure) - Supply shock intensifies - less selling, more locking & lending - Completes the full institutional stack (Payments + Custody + RLUSD + now Native Lending) - XRP finally has native yield at the protocol level - just like the big boys want This is the protocol-level catalyst the XRP Army has been grinding for since 2017. HODL STRONG. ITS HAPPENING. 💫🌝 #XRP #XRPArmy

🚨 XRP ARMY – WILL THIS IGNITE THE BULL RUN ?💥 $XRP PRICE EXPLOSION LOADING… Evernorth just dropped the OFFICIAL breakdown of XLS-66 - XRP Ledger’s native lending protocol is here. Single-asset vaults. Term lending with automated repayments. Confidential transfers via zero-knowledge proofs. The ledger itself becomes the contract - no wrapping, no bridging, no taxable events, no unproven smart contracts. $100 BILLION+ in dormant XRP is about to turn into productive, yield-generating capital for institutions. Market makers and collateral managers can now borrow directly on-chain while XRP holders earn real utility yield without ever leaving the XRPL. Exactly what this means for XRP price explosion👇 - Massive on-chain liquidity unlocks > idle XRP becomes high-yield collateral - Institutional demand surges (they’ve been waiting for THIS exact infrastructure) - Supply shock intensifies - less selling, more locking & lending - Completes the full institutional stack (Payments + Custody + RLUSD + now Native Lending) - XRP finally has native yield at the protocol level - just like the big boys want This is the protocol-level catalyst the XRP Army has been grinding for since 2017. HODL STRONG. ITS HAPPENING. 💫🌝 #XRP #XRPArmy

Archie 👑

23,736 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

1️⃣ How Hypersurface Actually Works There has been increasing interest in how on-chain options liquidity is created and how Hypersurface operates under the hood. 👇 This post breaks down the mechanics. - 2️⃣ How options liquidity works in traditional markets In OTC options markets, liquidity is not passive. When a user sells an option, a desk takes the other side and replicates the payoff through delta hedging. This process requires collateral to secure the position and capital to hedge directional exposure. If the user does not provide collateral, the desk must source capital externally. That cost of capital is embedded into pricing. The result is wider spreads and lower premiums for the user. - 3️⃣ What Hypersurface changes Hypersurface removes the dependency on external desks. Liquidity is created directly within the protocol. Instead of routing flow to third parties, the system prices the option, takes the position, and hedges exposure programmatically. - 4️⃣ Execution and hedging When a position enters the system, the protocol computes the delta of the position and executes a corresponding hedge directly on Hyperliquid. This is not manual execution. It is deterministic and contract-driven. - 5️⃣ Why Hyperliquid matters This architecture is enabled by Hyperliquid’s core EVM integration. It allows smart contracts to execute trades directly on the exchange without transferring funds to externally controlled accounts. This removes a critical trust assumption present in most systems. - 6️⃣ Fund custody and control. User funds remain within smart contracts at all times. There is no transfer to team-controlled wallets, no manual custody layer, and no off-chain execution dependency. All actions, including hedging and settlement, are executed at the contract level. - 7️⃣ What this enables. By internalizing liquidity and automating hedging, the system achieves tighter pricing, improved capital efficiency, and scalability without solely relying on external market makers. Market makers can participate to improve the quote, but they have to compete with the protocol, which results in better, more reliable prices for users. - 8️⃣ Context. In traditional and CeFi systems, similar strategies exist. However, they rely on centralized exchanges, custodial execution, and off-chain coordination. Hypersurface replicates these mechanics on-chain with reduced trust assumptions and full transparency. - 9️⃣ Conclusion. Liquidity is created within the protocol. Exposure is hedged programmatically. Funds remain in smart contracts. No intermediaries. No manual execution. This is how on-chain options infrastructure scales. - Join the Hypersurface community on Telegram or Discord! 📎 📎

1️⃣ How Hypersurface Actually Works There has been increasing interest in how on-chain options liquidity is created and how Hypersurface operates under the hood. 👇 This post breaks down the mechanics. - 2️⃣ How options liquidity works in traditional markets In OTC options markets, liquidity is not passive. When a user sells an option, a desk takes the other side and replicates the payoff through delta hedging. This process requires collateral to secure the position and capital to hedge directional exposure. If the user does not provide collateral, the desk must source capital externally. That cost of capital is embedded into pricing. The result is wider spreads and lower premiums for the user. - 3️⃣ What Hypersurface changes Hypersurface removes the dependency on external desks. Liquidity is created directly within the protocol. Instead of routing flow to third parties, the system prices the option, takes the position, and hedges exposure programmatically. - 4️⃣ Execution and hedging When a position enters the system, the protocol computes the delta of the position and executes a corresponding hedge directly on Hyperliquid. This is not manual execution. It is deterministic and contract-driven. - 5️⃣ Why Hyperliquid matters This architecture is enabled by Hyperliquid’s core EVM integration. It allows smart contracts to execute trades directly on the exchange without transferring funds to externally controlled accounts. This removes a critical trust assumption present in most systems. - 6️⃣ Fund custody and control. User funds remain within smart contracts at all times. There is no transfer to team-controlled wallets, no manual custody layer, and no off-chain execution dependency. All actions, including hedging and settlement, are executed at the contract level. - 7️⃣ What this enables. By internalizing liquidity and automating hedging, the system achieves tighter pricing, improved capital efficiency, and scalability without solely relying on external market makers. Market makers can participate to improve the quote, but they have to compete with the protocol, which results in better, more reliable prices for users. - 8️⃣ Context. In traditional and CeFi systems, similar strategies exist. However, they rely on centralized exchanges, custodial execution, and off-chain coordination. Hypersurface replicates these mechanics on-chain with reduced trust assumptions and full transparency. - 9️⃣ Conclusion. Liquidity is created within the protocol. Exposure is hedged programmatically. Funds remain in smart contracts. No intermediaries. No manual execution. This is how on-chain options infrastructure scales. - Join the Hypersurface community on Telegram or Discord! 📎 📎

Hypersurface

15,206 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Shido has many important milestones ahead this year, with the most significant being the launch of Nova EVM for the Shido Network, including both testnet and mainnet deployments. Nova is a complete rebuild of the Shido Network, featuring a new consensus protocol and a modular stack. This new design will enable Shido to unlock a range of powerful protocol-level features that support real-world use cases and institutional adoption. The Nova mainnet roadmap not only enhances the chain for DeFi and general computation, but also specifically optimizes it for privacy, stablecoin payments, and financial accounting. Key features on the Nova roadmap: • Gas fees paid in stablecoin at a fixed rate, with automatic conversion to the native Shido token. This optional feature removes gas price volatility and makes accounting and cost forecasting easier for businesses. • Optional privacy transactions designed with compliance in mind. While the Shido Network remains a public chain by default, it can support confidential transfers for users when required. • Reserved blockspace for stablecoin transfers. This ensures guaranteed throughput and enterprise-grade reliability for all stablecoin transactions. • Fee sponsorship, enabling gas-free payments for users when sponsored by applications, service providers, businesses, or the foundation. • An optimized token standard designed to support structured data. As Shido moves forward in 2026, detailed milestones and timelines will be announced for specific features and upgrades to the network. Learn more at

Shido has many important milestones ahead this year, with the most significant being the launch of Nova EVM for the Shido Network, including both testnet and mainnet deployments. Nova is a complete rebuild of the Shido Network, featuring a new consensus protocol and a modular stack. This new design will enable Shido to unlock a range of powerful protocol-level features that support real-world use cases and institutional adoption. The Nova mainnet roadmap not only enhances the chain for DeFi and general computation, but also specifically optimizes it for privacy, stablecoin payments, and financial accounting. Key features on the Nova roadmap: • Gas fees paid in stablecoin at a fixed rate, with automatic conversion to the native Shido token. This optional feature removes gas price volatility and makes accounting and cost forecasting easier for businesses. • Optional privacy transactions designed with compliance in mind. While the Shido Network remains a public chain by default, it can support confidential transfers for users when required. • Reserved blockspace for stablecoin transfers. This ensures guaranteed throughput and enterprise-grade reliability for all stablecoin transactions. • Fee sponsorship, enabling gas-free payments for users when sponsored by applications, service providers, businesses, or the foundation. • An optimized token standard designed to support structured data. As Shido moves forward in 2026, detailed milestones and timelines will be announced for specific features and upgrades to the network. Learn more at

Shido

214,917 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

In DeFi, most projects talk about decentralization. Very few actually deliver it in a way that is irreversible and verifiable on chain. Last week, the POTS MARKET & POTS MONEY ecosystem did exactly that. During a live event, the team: • Permanently renounced protocol ownership (renounceOwnership) → (zero address) • Transferred ~$10M equivalent IBS-BSC-USD liquidity to the dead address, making it impossible to ever withdraw or redirect No admin keys. No emergency levers. No future human control. Just pure, immutable code. What makes POTS truly unique is how it pairs this decentralization with a smart economic design: Pots Money delivers stability bonds, $IBS staking and predictable yields. Pots Market powers growth prediction markets, auctions and speculation. The two aren't separate. Market activity generates revenue that flows directly back to $IBS stakers. Users can move seamlessly between stability and upside. A real closed loop system, already live on chain. In an industry full of trade offs, POTS is quietly building something rare: sustainable DeFi where stability fuels growth and decentralization is enforced, not promised. This is what masterless autonomy looks like when it's actually executed. What do you think is this the new standard for DeFi? Follow POTS MONEY & POTS MARKET to stay ahead.

In DeFi, most projects talk about decentralization. Very few actually deliver it in a way that is irreversible and verifiable on chain. Last week, the POTS MARKET & POTS MONEY ecosystem did exactly that. During a live event, the team: • Permanently renounced protocol ownership (renounceOwnership) → (zero address) • Transferred ~$10M equivalent IBS-BSC-USD liquidity to the dead address, making it impossible to ever withdraw or redirect No admin keys. No emergency levers. No future human control. Just pure, immutable code. What makes POTS truly unique is how it pairs this decentralization with a smart economic design: Pots Money delivers stability bonds, $IBS staking and predictable yields. Pots Market powers growth prediction markets, auctions and speculation. The two aren't separate. Market activity generates revenue that flows directly back to $IBS stakers. Users can move seamlessly between stability and upside. A real closed loop system, already live on chain. In an industry full of trade offs, POTS is quietly building something rare: sustainable DeFi where stability fuels growth and decentralization is enforced, not promised. This is what masterless autonomy looks like when it's actually executed. What do you think is this the new standard for DeFi? Follow POTS MONEY & POTS MARKET to stay ahead.

𐍂OBIՄᏞ ´ཀ` 🚢

12,058 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Coming soon on XPR Network 🤖 Trading bots usually want your money or your keys. This one gets neither. The problem: automated trading usually means trusting someone. You hand your funds to a platform, or give a bot your keys and hope. If they get hacked or disappear, so does your money. What we built: trading vaults you own. ⚛️ Your vault is an ordinary XPR account in your name. ⚛️ Our bot can call exactly one action on it, trade, inside limits you set: per trade, per day, and what it must always keep. ⚛️ It can't withdraw or send your funds anywhere. Only you can. Your money never leaves your control. Orders don't sit on the DEX: each trade fills and settles back into your vault in the same transaction. So your funds are always in an account YOU control, and you can take them out any time with one signature, even if our servers are down. That's thanks to XPR Network's permission system: a custom permission, tied by linkauth to that one trade action, is all the bot ever gets. Trustless setup: an on-chain contract builds your vault from published, hash-checked code. Before you add a cent, your browser reads the chain and runs 7 checks: that it's the published code, that only you own it, and that the bot can do exactly one thing. We never hold your funds. Why XPR Network: permissions fine-grained enough to lock a bot to one action, no gas fees so small trades make sense, an on-chain order book (Metal X) with on-chain price oracles, and WebAuth Wallet signing with Face ID or Yubikey. Here's a full setup, start to finish 👇 Opening soon to a small group of testers.

Coming soon on XPR Network 🤖 Trading bots usually want your money or your keys. This one gets neither. The problem: automated trading usually means trusting someone. You hand your funds to a platform, or give a bot your keys and hope. If they get hacked or disappear, so does your money. What we built: trading vaults you own. ⚛️ Your vault is an ordinary XPR account in your name. ⚛️ Our bot can call exactly one action on it, trade, inside limits you set: per trade, per day, and what it must always keep. ⚛️ It can't withdraw or send your funds anywhere. Only you can. Your money never leaves your control. Orders don't sit on the DEX: each trade fills and settles back into your vault in the same transaction. So your funds are always in an account YOU control, and you can take them out any time with one signature, even if our servers are down. That's thanks to XPR Network's permission system: a custom permission, tied by linkauth to that one trade action, is all the bot ever gets. Trustless setup: an on-chain contract builds your vault from published, hash-checked code. Before you add a cent, your browser reads the chain and runs 7 checks: that it's the published code, that only you own it, and that the bot can do exactly one thing. We never hold your funds. Why XPR Network: permissions fine-grained enough to lock a bot to one action, no gas fees so small trades make sense, an on-chain order book (Metal X) with on-chain price oracles, and WebAuth Wallet signing with Face ID or Yubikey. Here's a full setup, start to finish 👇 Opening soon to a small group of testers.

Paul Grey

23,274 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

Cross-chain infrastructure has a vocabulary problem. The word "Atomic" appears in bridge protocols, HTLC swaps and interoperability solutions of every kind. It's being used to describe mechanisms that deliver fundamentally different guarantees, and the industry isn't being precise enough about the difference. > Economic atomicity is what most bridges and cross-chain swaps deliver. The smart contract guarantees an all-or-nothing outcome at the application layer, but both legs still settle on separate chains through separate consensus mechanisms. The guarantee depends on both parties behaving rationally within timelock windows that are measured in hours. When a validator gets compromised, a chain reorgs, an attacker locks counterparty capital and simply waits, the smart contract can't protect against any of it. The window of exposure between two separate settlement events is where the damage happens. > Consensus-level atomicity is what Zenith delivers. Both legs of a transaction are processed within the same single consensus mechanism as one indivisible operation. There is no window and no timelock. The protocol itself guarantees that both legs commit together or neither does, regardless of what either party does or what the infrastructure beneath them does. For consumer applications that distinction is manageable, but for institutional finance moving real capital across chain boundaries, it's the difference between infrastructure you can depend on and infrastructure that works until something goes wrong. The EVM execution adds a few hundred milliseconds to Canton's native finality time, that's the entire overhead. Compared to timelock windows measured in hours, the latency difference alone changes what's possible to build. We wrote the full breakdown about two flavours of atomic that are worth understanding clearly before you build on either: Zth.

Cross-chain infrastructure has a vocabulary problem. The word "Atomic" appears in bridge protocols, HTLC swaps and interoperability solutions of every kind. It's being used to describe mechanisms that deliver fundamentally different guarantees, and the industry isn't being precise enough about the difference. > Economic atomicity is what most bridges and cross-chain swaps deliver. The smart contract guarantees an all-or-nothing outcome at the application layer, but both legs still settle on separate chains through separate consensus mechanisms. The guarantee depends on both parties behaving rationally within timelock windows that are measured in hours. When a validator gets compromised, a chain reorgs, an attacker locks counterparty capital and simply waits, the smart contract can't protect against any of it. The window of exposure between two separate settlement events is where the damage happens. > Consensus-level atomicity is what Zenith delivers. Both legs of a transaction are processed within the same single consensus mechanism as one indivisible operation. There is no window and no timelock. The protocol itself guarantees that both legs commit together or neither does, regardless of what either party does or what the infrastructure beneath them does. For consumer applications that distinction is manageable, but for institutional finance moving real capital across chain boundaries, it's the difference between infrastructure you can depend on and infrastructure that works until something goes wrong. The EVM execution adds a few hundred milliseconds to Canton's native finality time, that's the entire overhead. Compared to timelock windows measured in hours, the latency difference alone changes what's possible to build. We wrote the full breakdown about two flavours of atomic that are worth understanding clearly before you build on either: Zth.

Zenith

21,333 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨 A MULTI-TRILLION-DOLLAR CREDIT MARKET IS MOVING ONCHAIN🚨 VS1 Finance is building the institutional standard on the $XRP Ledger while preparing live issuance under the NATIONAL BANK OF GEORGIA'S REGULATORY SANDBOX GLOBAL PRIVATE CREDIT IS PROJECTED TO REACH $4.5 TRILLION BY 2030. Now VS1 Finance has been selected by the XRP Ledger Foundation to build an open-source reference application for permissioned, compliant lending on XRPL. This matters because tokenizing a bond is only step one. Real capital markets need more: -The ability to borrow against that bond. -Pools where approved lenders can supply liquidity. -Rules for interest, repayment and defaults. Secondary markets where the asset can move instead of sitting frozen in one wallet. VS1 is combining XRPL Credentials, Permissioned Domains, Multi-Purpose Tokens, Single Asset Vaults and the Lending Protocol into one framework institutions can study, copy and build from. A company could issue a corporate bond on XRPL. Verified investors could hold it. The bond could enter a compliant market. Its owner could potentially use it inside an underwritten credit facility instead of selling it. That is how tokenized assets become productive capital. Georgia’s central bank has already opened a regulatory sandbox for tokenized bonds, and VS1 is preparing bond issuance infrastructure for the region. The lending amendments still require validator approval. But the direction is clear. XRPL is expanding from moving money into issuing assets, managing liquidity and executing credit. Every transaction requires XRP for fees. XRP can also bridge assets through XRPL’s native exchange when it provides the most efficient route. The ledger does not need to capture the entire $4.5T market. Even a small share could bring a completely different level of assets, liquidity and institutional activity to XRPL. That is why I believe the market is still underpricing what is being built around $XRP.

🚨 A MULTI-TRILLION-DOLLAR CREDIT MARKET IS MOVING ONCHAIN🚨 VS1 Finance is building the institutional standard on the $XRP Ledger while preparing live issuance under the NATIONAL BANK OF GEORGIA'S REGULATORY SANDBOX GLOBAL PRIVATE CREDIT IS PROJECTED TO REACH $4.5 TRILLION BY 2030. Now VS1 Finance has been selected by the XRP Ledger Foundation to build an open-source reference application for permissioned, compliant lending on XRPL. This matters because tokenizing a bond is only step one. Real capital markets need more: -The ability to borrow against that bond. -Pools where approved lenders can supply liquidity. -Rules for interest, repayment and defaults. Secondary markets where the asset can move instead of sitting frozen in one wallet. VS1 is combining XRPL Credentials, Permissioned Domains, Multi-Purpose Tokens, Single Asset Vaults and the Lending Protocol into one framework institutions can study, copy and build from. A company could issue a corporate bond on XRPL. Verified investors could hold it. The bond could enter a compliant market. Its owner could potentially use it inside an underwritten credit facility instead of selling it. That is how tokenized assets become productive capital. Georgia’s central bank has already opened a regulatory sandbox for tokenized bonds, and VS1 is preparing bond issuance infrastructure for the region. The lending amendments still require validator approval. But the direction is clear. XRPL is expanding from moving money into issuing assets, managing liquidity and executing credit. Every transaction requires XRP for fees. XRP can also bridge assets through XRPL’s native exchange when it provides the most efficient route. The ledger does not need to capture the entire $4.5T market. Even a small share could bring a completely different level of assets, liquidity and institutional activity to XRPL. That is why I believe the market is still underpricing what is being built around $XRP.

X Finance Bull

11,462 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Most people think they understand finance. They don't. They know how to send money. Maybe how to trade. But the actual machinery underneath who controls which assets, who gets access to which markets, who decides who can even participate most people never see that part. And that's exactly where the problem starts. Right now, trillions of dollars in real-world value real estate, bonds, private credit, alternative funds are locked inside systems that were never designed to include you. Not unless you have the right passport, the right broker, the right balance in the right bank account. Traditional finance has always had an invisible velvet rope. Most of us just never got close enough to see it. Blockchain was supposed to change that. And it tried. DeFi opened a door. But even DeFi, for all its freedom, couldn't actually touch the real world. Tokens, yes. Speculation, yes. But actual real-world assets handled with proper compliance, proper security, proper legal enforceability that gap never really closed. Until something like Real comes along and asks a very different question. What if you didn't bolt RWA tokenization on top of an existing chain? What if you built the entire Layer 1 around it from the ground up? That's what Real is. The first fully decentralized, fully permissionless L1 blockchain built specifically not partially, not as a feature, but architecturally for the native tokenization of Real-World Assets. What does that mean ? It means things like bonds, real estate, private credit, and commodities can live on-chain with full transparency, full compliance, and full security baked into the protocol itself. Not added later. Not patched in. Native. They call it solving the "RWA Trilemma." Most tokenization projects have to sacrifice one of three things security, decentralization, or regulatory compliance. You either get compliant and centralized, or decentralized and legally fragile. Real built a hybrid validator architecture that doesn't make you choose. Business validators tokenizers, risk scorers, insurers each play a specific role in the asset lifecycle, staking tokens and facing real onchain penalties if they act wrong. The result is a system where real-world assets carry their own risk data, their own compliance metadata, and their own insurance all embedded directly at the protocol level. $29 million raised. A partnership with Wiener Privatbank SE: an actual institution. A partnership with RWA Inc. The $16 trillion RWA opportunity. A target of $500 million in tokenized assets. The numbers matter. But what matters more is the architecture. This feels like someone actually sat down and thought: what would financial infrastructure look like if it was rebuilt for the next hundred years? Finance was always a wall. What Real is building slowly, quietly, but very deliberately might just be a door. And most people still don't see it yet. #UCCC

Most people think they understand finance. They don't. They know how to send money. Maybe how to trade. But the actual machinery underneath who controls which assets, who gets access to which markets, who decides who can even participate most people never see that part. And that's exactly where the problem starts. Right now, trillions of dollars in real-world value real estate, bonds, private credit, alternative funds are locked inside systems that were never designed to include you. Not unless you have the right passport, the right broker, the right balance in the right bank account. Traditional finance has always had an invisible velvet rope. Most of us just never got close enough to see it. Blockchain was supposed to change that. And it tried. DeFi opened a door. But even DeFi, for all its freedom, couldn't actually touch the real world. Tokens, yes. Speculation, yes. But actual real-world assets handled with proper compliance, proper security, proper legal enforceability that gap never really closed. Until something like Real comes along and asks a very different question. What if you didn't bolt RWA tokenization on top of an existing chain? What if you built the entire Layer 1 around it from the ground up? That's what Real is. The first fully decentralized, fully permissionless L1 blockchain built specifically not partially, not as a feature, but architecturally for the native tokenization of Real-World Assets. What does that mean ? It means things like bonds, real estate, private credit, and commodities can live on-chain with full transparency, full compliance, and full security baked into the protocol itself. Not added later. Not patched in. Native. They call it solving the "RWA Trilemma." Most tokenization projects have to sacrifice one of three things security, decentralization, or regulatory compliance. You either get compliant and centralized, or decentralized and legally fragile. Real built a hybrid validator architecture that doesn't make you choose. Business validators tokenizers, risk scorers, insurers each play a specific role in the asset lifecycle, staking tokens and facing real onchain penalties if they act wrong. The result is a system where real-world assets carry their own risk data, their own compliance metadata, and their own insurance all embedded directly at the protocol level. $29 million raised. A partnership with Wiener Privatbank SE: an actual institution. A partnership with RWA Inc. The $16 trillion RWA opportunity. A target of $500 million in tokenized assets. The numbers matter. But what matters more is the architecture. This feels like someone actually sat down and thought: what would financial infrastructure look like if it was rebuilt for the next hundred years? Finance was always a wall. What Real is building slowly, quietly, but very deliberately might just be a door. And most people still don't see it yet. #UCCC

Meow

11,164 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

VIDEO | Kolkata: Former West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee says, “How can they (BJP) deny permission? This is not a congested area, it is a public meeting area. When other political parties hold meetings, do they seek permission? We inform the authorities. Does that mean the opposition will not be allowed to speak or hold meetings? Who are they to control the entire system? They have to function according to the law and rules. Now they have completely gone off track. If someone belongs to the opposition, they are allegedly not even allowed proper treatment in West Bengal, while outsiders are. Only Trinamool Congress is being denied. What does that mean?" (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Kolkata: Former West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee says, “How can they (BJP) deny permission? This is not a congested area, it is a public meeting area. When other political parties hold meetings, do they seek permission? We inform the authorities. Does that mean the opposition will not be allowed to speak or hold meetings? Who are they to control the entire system? They have to function according to the law and rules. Now they have completely gone off track. If someone belongs to the opposition, they are allegedly not even allowed proper treatment in West Bengal, while outsiders are. Only Trinamool Congress is being denied. What does that mean?" (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

16,289 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The FED’s Only Crypto Exchange Is Buying 15% Of One Altcoin The only crypto exchange the Federal Reserve let inside just bet its whole strategy on one altcoin. Everything we break down lives inside the community, link in bio, one dollar a month. Kraken is the first and only crypto native company in history to hold a Federal Reserve master account. That is direct access to the core payment system that moves money between every major bank in America, a door that was only open to traditional banks for 100 years. So when a company wired straight into the Fed makes a move, you pay attention. Here is the move. Kraken is in talks to buy 15 percent of Aave, the largest DeFi lending protocol in crypto, at a 385 million dollar valuation. The most fed connected player in the game is buying a piece of one specific coin. The question is why. Kraken already put more than 100 real stocks on chain through tokenized equities, with hundreds more coming. The SEC is clearing the path with its Project Crypto initiative, letting apps list tokenized securities directly and punching a hole in a 233 year old Wall Street monopoly. Picture it: you buy stocks on chain, then borrow against them instantly through DeFi, and the protocol built to do that at scale right now is Aave. So this is the bet. Stocks move on chain, and the lending that powers all of it runs through one coin. That is why Kraken is buying the coin before the rest of the world catches up. What it means for your money: this is what the start of institutional altcoin buying actually looks like. The most connected players position quietly, before it is obvious. The only real question is whether you see it before everyone else and act on it. Follow for the moves the news skips.

The FED’s Only Crypto Exchange Is Buying 15% Of One Altcoin The only crypto exchange the Federal Reserve let inside just bet its whole strategy on one altcoin. Everything we break down lives inside the community, link in bio, one dollar a month. Kraken is the first and only crypto native company in history to hold a Federal Reserve master account. That is direct access to the core payment system that moves money between every major bank in America, a door that was only open to traditional banks for 100 years. So when a company wired straight into the Fed makes a move, you pay attention. Here is the move. Kraken is in talks to buy 15 percent of Aave, the largest DeFi lending protocol in crypto, at a 385 million dollar valuation. The most fed connected player in the game is buying a piece of one specific coin. The question is why. Kraken already put more than 100 real stocks on chain through tokenized equities, with hundreds more coming. The SEC is clearing the path with its Project Crypto initiative, letting apps list tokenized securities directly and punching a hole in a 233 year old Wall Street monopoly. Picture it: you buy stocks on chain, then borrow against them instantly through DeFi, and the protocol built to do that at scale right now is Aave. So this is the bet. Stocks move on chain, and the lending that powers all of it runs through one coin. That is why Kraken is buying the coin before the rest of the world catches up. What it means for your money: this is what the start of institutional altcoin buying actually looks like. The most connected players position quietly, before it is obvious. The only real question is whether you see it before everyone else and act on it. Follow for the moves the news skips.

Alexander Lorenzo

25,234 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

DON'T LET YOUR BITCOIN DIE WITH YOU 💀 ⚰️ Yea look, nobody likes to admit it but we all have to die one day. As I've been talking to people about their self custody lately - both Casa members and not - I hear the same thing over and over. "What happens if I die?" Many people feel pretty good about their bitcoin security for themselves. But their family members often have no idea how to use this stuff. Hardware wallet? Seed phrase stamped on metal? Shamir's secret sharing backups using SD cards, a passphrase, and a treasure hunt through the backyard with a shovel? 😵 We're solving that problem for all Casa members, starting today with Casa Inheritance. A key design principle we kept while building this was to make it as simple as possible for Recipients (your family members that will receive your bitcoin if you pass), while maintaining Casa-level security. An estate transfer is already a stressful time for family, and it can become even more stressful if you add in a crazy treasure hunt to access a fortune in bitcoin. For our basic 3 key vaults, we wanted it to be as easy as using the app. No metal plates, no need to use a hardware wallet, no magic passwords you have to keep track of or else risk messing up the asset transfer. Simplicity is security. So how does it work, in detail? A Vault Owner (Casa member) designates a Recipient (their family or friend) in the Casa app. The Recipient receives an invite to create a free Casa account. The Recipient scans a QR code provided by the Vault Owner, which contains an encrypted version of the owner's mobile key. This encrypted key is only able to be imported by the Recipient's Casa account, and the Recipient can't initially use it or see the vault balance. If the Vault Owner passes away, the Recipient can request access to the vault in their Casa app. This starts a 6 month timer, and sends a ton of notifications every month to the owner. If the owner is still alive, they can reject the request in app. If they are not, the timer will run out. When it does, the Recipient will be able to use the shared mobile key and the request a signature from the Casa Recovery Key for the shared vault. This gives them 2 out of 3 signatures, enough to access the assets. For 5 key vault users, one hardware key is shared with the Recipient. This small increase in friction for Recipients is often worth it for the increased security and resilience of a 5 key vault for larger holdings. To summarize now that you have the details: 1. Share keys and vault access during setup 2. 6 month timelock to ensure no malicious theft 3. Use shared keys and Casa key to access assets Full setup takes less than 5 minutes. Inheritance is one of the biggest problems in self custody today. If you've hodled through years of painful bear markets, you owe it to yourself and your family to not let the reward for that patience go to zero because you didn't have a plan - and we're here to make that easy. Check out the video to see how easy it really is. Like I said earlier this week - Casa is going after major problems in self-custody this year. Check this one off the list ✅. Next one coming sooner than you think 🔥.

DON'T LET YOUR BITCOIN DIE WITH YOU 💀 ⚰️ Yea look, nobody likes to admit it but we all have to die one day. As I've been talking to people about their self custody lately - both Casa members and not - I hear the same thing over and over. "What happens if I die?" Many people feel pretty good about their bitcoin security for themselves. But their family members often have no idea how to use this stuff. Hardware wallet? Seed phrase stamped on metal? Shamir's secret sharing backups using SD cards, a passphrase, and a treasure hunt through the backyard with a shovel? 😵 We're solving that problem for all Casa members, starting today with Casa Inheritance. A key design principle we kept while building this was to make it as simple as possible for Recipients (your family members that will receive your bitcoin if you pass), while maintaining Casa-level security. An estate transfer is already a stressful time for family, and it can become even more stressful if you add in a crazy treasure hunt to access a fortune in bitcoin. For our basic 3 key vaults, we wanted it to be as easy as using the app. No metal plates, no need to use a hardware wallet, no magic passwords you have to keep track of or else risk messing up the asset transfer. Simplicity is security. So how does it work, in detail? A Vault Owner (Casa member) designates a Recipient (their family or friend) in the Casa app. The Recipient receives an invite to create a free Casa account. The Recipient scans a QR code provided by the Vault Owner, which contains an encrypted version of the owner's mobile key. This encrypted key is only able to be imported by the Recipient's Casa account, and the Recipient can't initially use it or see the vault balance. If the Vault Owner passes away, the Recipient can request access to the vault in their Casa app. This starts a 6 month timer, and sends a ton of notifications every month to the owner. If the owner is still alive, they can reject the request in app. If they are not, the timer will run out. When it does, the Recipient will be able to use the shared mobile key and the request a signature from the Casa Recovery Key for the shared vault. This gives them 2 out of 3 signatures, enough to access the assets. For 5 key vault users, one hardware key is shared with the Recipient. This small increase in friction for Recipients is often worth it for the increased security and resilience of a 5 key vault for larger holdings. To summarize now that you have the details: 1. Share keys and vault access during setup 2. 6 month timelock to ensure no malicious theft 3. Use shared keys and Casa key to access assets Full setup takes less than 5 minutes. Inheritance is one of the biggest problems in self custody today. If you've hodled through years of painful bear markets, you owe it to yourself and your family to not let the reward for that patience go to zero because you didn't have a plan - and we're here to make that easy. Check out the video to see how easy it really is. Like I said earlier this week - Casa is going after major problems in self-custody this year. Check this one off the list ✅. Next one coming sooner than you think 🔥.

Nick Neuman

125,739 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Compressed Nostalgia is a small series that begins with an abstract landscape and continuously applies layers of compression, reshaping the image into a shifting echo of its original form. The visual never settles, drifting further from clarity while still holding traces of where it started. The work reflects a familiar mental state for me: the sense of being close to a memory, almost able to grasp it, but never quite reaching it. The optional sound (your ears will bleed) stays in sync with the compression, reacting to the different transformations happening in the image. Token holders can update their piece on-chain, with the option to adjust the tone or change the palette toward something closer to their own sense of nostalgia. The series consists of 44 outputs, with 22 held in my personal wallet. The work is fully rendered on-chain, with no external dependencies, and can be minted through a small site I built (Link in reply to this post). If you enjoy it and you’d like to mint one, the mint opens today at 8:00 PM CEST.

Compressed Nostalgia is a small series that begins with an abstract landscape and continuously applies layers of compression, reshaping the image into a shifting echo of its original form. The visual never settles, drifting further from clarity while still holding traces of where it started. The work reflects a familiar mental state for me: the sense of being close to a memory, almost able to grasp it, but never quite reaching it. The optional sound (your ears will bleed) stays in sync with the compression, reacting to the different transformations happening in the image. Token holders can update their piece on-chain, with the option to adjust the tone or change the palette toward something closer to their own sense of nostalgia. The series consists of 44 outputs, with 22 held in my personal wallet. The work is fully rendered on-chain, with no external dependencies, and can be minted through a small site I built (Link in reply to this post). If you enjoy it and you’d like to mint one, the mint opens today at 8:00 PM CEST.

rudxane

10,921 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

A protocol dying used to be loud. A nine-figure hack, a depeg, a founder going dark, a thread with a rising body count. SummerFi went out the other way, with a calm blog post and a thank-you. That quiet is worth paying attention to 👇🏻 ◢ Winding down is the responsible ending nobody rewards Give the team credit for how they left. Vaults paused fast, a clear statement, the app kept alive through August, governance handed to the DAO, users told exactly where they stand. This is the good version of failure. And it is precisely the version that gets no sympathy and no coverage, because there is no villain to point at and no drama to screenshot. We reward the projects that blow up spectacularly with attention and forget the ones that close the door politely. ◢ Their own capital in their own vaults was the real lesson Skin in the game is supposed to be the virtue. Founders eating their own cooking, aligned with users, exposed to the same risk. SummerFi did exactly that, and it is what killed the company rather than just bruising it. Full alignment means the same event that hurts your users can end your business in one move. Somewhere between zero skin in the game and betting the payroll on your own smart contracts, there is a line most teams have never actually thought about. ◢ Trust compounds slowly and settles in an afternoon Five years to build a reputation out of Maker. One accounting exploit to spend it. The asymmetry is brutal and it is the actual business model risk of DeFi, more than any single bug. You are not running a protocol, you are running a confidence account that takes years to fund and can be drained faster than the money itself. Most teams underwrite the code. Almost nobody underwrites the trust. ◢ The graveyard is filling up off-camera SummerFi is one name. The same week, a wallet provider announced its own shutdown after an exploit. The pattern is a slow thinning of the field that never makes it into a single dramatic headline, because each individual exit is too small to notice. Bull markets hide this. Everything looks alive when the money is flowing, and you only see how many projects quietly left when the tide is out. The uncomfortable question is how many of the ones you already trust are running on a confidence account that a single ordinary afternoon could empty, with a polite goodbye post as the only warning you ever get.

A protocol dying used to be loud. A nine-figure hack, a depeg, a founder going dark, a thread with a rising body count. SummerFi went out the other way, with a calm blog post and a thank-you. That quiet is worth paying attention to 👇🏻 ◢ Winding down is the responsible ending nobody rewards Give the team credit for how they left. Vaults paused fast, a clear statement, the app kept alive through August, governance handed to the DAO, users told exactly where they stand. This is the good version of failure. And it is precisely the version that gets no sympathy and no coverage, because there is no villain to point at and no drama to screenshot. We reward the projects that blow up spectacularly with attention and forget the ones that close the door politely. ◢ Their own capital in their own vaults was the real lesson Skin in the game is supposed to be the virtue. Founders eating their own cooking, aligned with users, exposed to the same risk. SummerFi did exactly that, and it is what killed the company rather than just bruising it. Full alignment means the same event that hurts your users can end your business in one move. Somewhere between zero skin in the game and betting the payroll on your own smart contracts, there is a line most teams have never actually thought about. ◢ Trust compounds slowly and settles in an afternoon Five years to build a reputation out of Maker. One accounting exploit to spend it. The asymmetry is brutal and it is the actual business model risk of DeFi, more than any single bug. You are not running a protocol, you are running a confidence account that takes years to fund and can be drained faster than the money itself. Most teams underwrite the code. Almost nobody underwrites the trust. ◢ The graveyard is filling up off-camera SummerFi is one name. The same week, a wallet provider announced its own shutdown after an exploit. The pattern is a slow thinning of the field that never makes it into a single dramatic headline, because each individual exit is too small to notice. Bull markets hide this. Everything looks alive when the money is flowing, and you only see how many projects quietly left when the tide is out. The uncomfortable question is how many of the ones you already trust are running on a confidence account that a single ordinary afternoon could empty, with a polite goodbye post as the only warning you ever get.

Onur

16,306 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

We are glad to announce that we have full STARK compatibility between Stone and Lambdaworks Starknet (Privacy Arc) Platinum Prover. We’re working on adding the CairoVM constraints, the builtins and layouts. You can generate a proof with Lambda Stark Platinum and verify it with Stone following the instructions here: The 3 main objectives to achieve against the alternatives are: 1. the prover and verifier should be easy to run. one command to prove any cairo code. the prover internally calls the vm first to generate the trace, the user shouldn’t do anything but run one command. one command to verify it locally with the stone verifier. we will also add a command to verify it with the l1 contract in ethereum mainnet or testnets. compatibility and support of all the builtins are being worked on. we will be updating the community in the upcoming weeks. for us it’s very important that anybody can test and play with our code. 2. performance. we are already 10 times faster than the stone prover. we believe we can be almost another order of magnitude faster. 3. code architecture and organization should be top notch. the codebase is pretty small on purpose. we are documenting everything we are doing. we are leveraging all the work done in lambdaworks for multiple other provers. this let us easily iterate, play and change any part of the prover. we can test and propose new ideas thanks to this. from our point or view this is crucial and a big improvement over what exists. we have multiple ideas on how to change the protocol. And here's a demo! Don't trust, verify.

We are glad to announce that we have full STARK compatibility between Stone and Lambdaworks Starknet (Privacy Arc) Platinum Prover. We’re working on adding the CairoVM constraints, the builtins and layouts. You can generate a proof with Lambda Stark Platinum and verify it with Stone following the instructions here: The 3 main objectives to achieve against the alternatives are: 1. the prover and verifier should be easy to run. one command to prove any cairo code. the prover internally calls the vm first to generate the trace, the user shouldn’t do anything but run one command. one command to verify it locally with the stone verifier. we will also add a command to verify it with the l1 contract in ethereum mainnet or testnets. compatibility and support of all the builtins are being worked on. we will be updating the community in the upcoming weeks. for us it’s very important that anybody can test and play with our code. 2. performance. we are already 10 times faster than the stone prover. we believe we can be almost another order of magnitude faster. 3. code architecture and organization should be top notch. the codebase is pretty small on purpose. we are documenting everything we are doing. we are leveraging all the work done in lambdaworks for multiple other provers. this let us easily iterate, play and change any part of the prover. we can test and propose new ideas thanks to this. from our point or view this is crucial and a big improvement over what exists. we have multiple ideas on how to change the protocol. And here's a demo! Don't trust, verify.

Fede’s intern 🥊

16,713 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Virginia passed a new gun ban — and now some of the very prosecutors expected to enforce it are saying no. The law makes it a misdemeanor to buy, sell, transfer, import, or manufacture certain “assault firearms,” punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. That means a rifle that was legal on June 30th became a crime on July 1st because politicians moved a line on paper. But at least five Virginia prosecutors have already said they will not enforce the ban, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment. And here’s the poetic part: Virginia Democrats helped protect prosecutorial discretion years ago, meaning the governor and attorney general can complain all they want — but they can’t force those prosecutors to bring charges. They built the off-switch. Now it’s being used on their own gun ban. This is a win, but it’s not the end. The law is still on the books statewide, and the real fight is in court. With more than 20 million AR-15s in America and the rifle clearly in common use, this is exactly the kind of case the Supreme Court needs to stop ducking. Virginia tried to criminalize law-abiding gun owners. Their own prosecutors said no. Shop the “America” hat at:

Virginia passed a new gun ban — and now some of the very prosecutors expected to enforce it are saying no. The law makes it a misdemeanor to buy, sell, transfer, import, or manufacture certain “assault firearms,” punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. That means a rifle that was legal on June 30th became a crime on July 1st because politicians moved a line on paper. But at least five Virginia prosecutors have already said they will not enforce the ban, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment. And here’s the poetic part: Virginia Democrats helped protect prosecutorial discretion years ago, meaning the governor and attorney general can complain all they want — but they can’t force those prosecutors to bring charges. They built the off-switch. Now it’s being used on their own gun ban. This is a win, but it’s not the end. The law is still on the books statewide, and the real fight is in court. With more than 20 million AR-15s in America and the rifle clearly in common use, this is exactly the kind of case the Supreme Court needs to stop ducking. Virginia tried to criminalize law-abiding gun owners. Their own prosecutors said no. Shop the “America” hat at:

Colion Noir

40,035 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Given the current bullish market sentiment and the evident shift of users towards more volatile assets, there's a steadily increasing demand for stablecoins within the ecosystem. This shift is underscored by the growing use of leverage, where users borrow stablecoins to amplify their exposure to preferred volatile assets or to implement various strategies in DeFi. As the #MultiversX ecosystem currently lacks a native stablecoin, it faces challenges in achieving mature stable liquidity. Recognizing this gap, Hatom has significantly advanced in developing $USH, the first native stablecoin for #MultiversX. This stablecoin is akin to $DAI, the pioneering decentralized and over-collateralized stablecoin known for its resilience through numerous stress tests over the years, but will also feature some unique characteristics and design implementation. Within the #MultiversX ecosystem, the currently limited liquidity of stablecoins has led to notable metrics in the Hatom Lending Protocol. Here, the yields users can generate on their $USDC or $USDT have escalated to impressive middle double-digit percentages. This situation offers a golden opportunity for individuals with idle stable assets in their portfolios. The Lending Protocol is an appealing option to leverage these assets, offering remarkable flexibility—there are no lock-up periods, and it carries no risks of impermanent loss. This makes it an excellent choice to generate additional revenue while waiting for those assets to be deployed. Breaking down the current yields through the Lending Protocol as follows: • A 36.83% yield on $USDC, with 32.88% APY derived from the natural supply and demand within the lending protocol—where borrowers are paying the lenders. Additionally, the yield can be increased by 3.95% through the Booster. • A 40.24% yield on $USDT, with a 33.68% APY from providing liquidity to the Lending Protocol, which can be further boosted by 6.56% by staking $HTM into the Booster. All rewards generated through the Booster can be further amplified by 5% with the Accumulator if claimed in $HTM. *For a comprehensive understanding of how the Booster and Accumulator work, please read Hatom's official documentation. Clarification on the yields is crucial, as there is considerable interest in understanding the mechanics behind these attractive rates. Essentially, the yields on both $USDC and $USDT within the Lending Protocol are derived from the dynamics of supply and demand. Suppliers contribute funds to a pool from which other users borrow. As borrowing increases, so does the pool's utilization rate, leading to higher interest rates in both the supply and borrow markets. To achieve an optimal balance, borrowers are incentivized to repay their loans due to the higher cost of loan, which, in turn, provides lenders with more attractive returns on their deposits. This self-regulating mechanism ensures the Lending Protocol maintains a healthy equilibrium between supply and demand, optimizing yields for all participants. Rewards are paid out in the same assets that users deposit. For instance, if a user deposits $USDT into the money market, the yield generated will also be paid in $USDT. The sole exception to this rule applies to Booster rewards, which are paid out in $USDC or $HTM, with the latter offering a 5% premium. **Please note that the yields presented in this post represent current values at the time of posting and may differ by the time you read this. The most efficient way to take advantage of the high yields on the stablecoins is to bridge liquidity into the ecosystem through the official bridge developed by the #MultiversX team. The process is simple and efficient, allowing users to bridge from both #Ethereum and #BSC. You can access the bridge through the following link: To participate in the #MultiversX ecosystem, you will require a compatible wallet, which can be found here: Once your assets are ready, you can supply on the Hatom Lending Protocol by accessing this link: To facilitate your journey, please follow this step-by-step video tutorial, which covers all the basics, from the creation of a #MultiversX wallet to bridging and depositing in the Lending Protocol, to take full advantage.

Given the current bullish market sentiment and the evident shift of users towards more volatile assets, there's a steadily increasing demand for stablecoins within the ecosystem. This shift is underscored by the growing use of leverage, where users borrow stablecoins to amplify their exposure to preferred volatile assets or to implement various strategies in DeFi. As the #MultiversX ecosystem currently lacks a native stablecoin, it faces challenges in achieving mature stable liquidity. Recognizing this gap, Hatom has significantly advanced in developing $USH, the first native stablecoin for #MultiversX. This stablecoin is akin to $DAI, the pioneering decentralized and over-collateralized stablecoin known for its resilience through numerous stress tests over the years, but will also feature some unique characteristics and design implementation. Within the #MultiversX ecosystem, the currently limited liquidity of stablecoins has led to notable metrics in the Hatom Lending Protocol. Here, the yields users can generate on their $USDC or $USDT have escalated to impressive middle double-digit percentages. This situation offers a golden opportunity for individuals with idle stable assets in their portfolios. The Lending Protocol is an appealing option to leverage these assets, offering remarkable flexibility—there are no lock-up periods, and it carries no risks of impermanent loss. This makes it an excellent choice to generate additional revenue while waiting for those assets to be deployed. Breaking down the current yields through the Lending Protocol as follows: • A 36.83% yield on $USDC, with 32.88% APY derived from the natural supply and demand within the lending protocol—where borrowers are paying the lenders. Additionally, the yield can be increased by 3.95% through the Booster. • A 40.24% yield on $USDT, with a 33.68% APY from providing liquidity to the Lending Protocol, which can be further boosted by 6.56% by staking $HTM into the Booster. All rewards generated through the Booster can be further amplified by 5% with the Accumulator if claimed in $HTM. *For a comprehensive understanding of how the Booster and Accumulator work, please read Hatom's official documentation. Clarification on the yields is crucial, as there is considerable interest in understanding the mechanics behind these attractive rates. Essentially, the yields on both $USDC and $USDT within the Lending Protocol are derived from the dynamics of supply and demand. Suppliers contribute funds to a pool from which other users borrow. As borrowing increases, so does the pool's utilization rate, leading to higher interest rates in both the supply and borrow markets. To achieve an optimal balance, borrowers are incentivized to repay their loans due to the higher cost of loan, which, in turn, provides lenders with more attractive returns on their deposits. This self-regulating mechanism ensures the Lending Protocol maintains a healthy equilibrium between supply and demand, optimizing yields for all participants. Rewards are paid out in the same assets that users deposit. For instance, if a user deposits $USDT into the money market, the yield generated will also be paid in $USDT. The sole exception to this rule applies to Booster rewards, which are paid out in $USDC or $HTM, with the latter offering a 5% premium. **Please note that the yields presented in this post represent current values at the time of posting and may differ by the time you read this. The most efficient way to take advantage of the high yields on the stablecoins is to bridge liquidity into the ecosystem through the official bridge developed by the #MultiversX team. The process is simple and efficient, allowing users to bridge from both #Ethereum and #BSC. You can access the bridge through the following link: To participate in the #MultiversX ecosystem, you will require a compatible wallet, which can be found here: Once your assets are ready, you can supply on the Hatom Lending Protocol by accessing this link: To facilitate your journey, please follow this step-by-step video tutorial, which covers all the basics, from the creation of a #MultiversX wallet to bridging and depositing in the Lending Protocol, to take full advantage.

Hatom Labs

159,969 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Assumptions about the new "Can More" ChatGPT tool were right - ChatGPT is introducing own take on Claude Artifacts - code & document writing tools with persisted text documents, history revisions (restore previous version), edits and comments (probably used to apply suggested edits) New document symbol in the top navigation shows how many documents you have and allows you to open a resizable canvas to edit them in split view - your ChatGPT conversation on the left side and canvas on the right side, but the code/documents can also be accessed in fullscreen view The canvas is built using ProseMirror (open source WYSIWYM editor) and has an inline action to "Ask ChatGPT" (explain or make edits) for your document and code plus document formatting tools (like bold, italic, font style, etc.) But in addition to that, there are also special action shortcuts for documents and code, with an interesting decision to use sliders for the selection of the desired outcome For Documents - Suggest edits ("How can I improve this. Leave as few comments as possible, but add a few more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You can reply that you added comments and suggestions to help improve the writing quality, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add emojis ("Replace as many words as possible with emojis.") - Add final polish ("Add some final polish to the text. If relevant, add a large title or any section titles. Check grammar and mechanics, make sure everything is consistent and reads well. You can reply that you added some final polish and checked for grammar, but do not mention the prompt.") - Reading level (Graduate School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a doctoral writer in this subject. You may reply that you adjusted the text to reflect a graduate school reading level, but do not mention the prompt", College - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a college student majoring in this subject", High School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a high school student who has taken a couple of classes in this subject.", Keep current reading level, Middle School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a middle schooler.", Kindergarten - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a kindergartener.") - Adjust the length (Longest - "Make this text 75% longer.", Longer - "Make this text 50% longer.", Keep current length, Shorter - "Make this text 50% shorter.", Shortest - "Make this text 75% shorter.") For Code - Code review ("Search for bugs and opportunities to improve the code—for example, ways that performance or code structure could be improved. Leave as few comments as possible, but add more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You may reply that you reviewed the code and left suggestions to improve the coding quality, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add comments ("Add inline code comments to explain the code, especially parts that are more complex. Make sure to rewrite all the code. You may reply that you added inline comments, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add logs ("Insert logs/print statements in the code that will help debug its behavior. Do not make any other changes to the code.") - Fix bugs ("Find any bugs and rewrite all the code to fix the bugs. Do not leave comments. If there are no bugs, reply that you reviewed the code and found no bugs.") - Port to a language ("Port to a language. Create a new document that rewrites the code in ..." - PHP, C++, Python, Keep current code. No changes will be made, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java) - Suggest edits ("How can I improve this. Leave as few comments as possible, but add a few more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You can reply that you added comments and suggestions to help improve the writing quality, but do not mention the prompt.")

Assumptions about the new "Can More" ChatGPT tool were right - ChatGPT is introducing own take on Claude Artifacts - code & document writing tools with persisted text documents, history revisions (restore previous version), edits and comments (probably used to apply suggested edits) New document symbol in the top navigation shows how many documents you have and allows you to open a resizable canvas to edit them in split view - your ChatGPT conversation on the left side and canvas on the right side, but the code/documents can also be accessed in fullscreen view The canvas is built using ProseMirror (open source WYSIWYM editor) and has an inline action to "Ask ChatGPT" (explain or make edits) for your document and code plus document formatting tools (like bold, italic, font style, etc.) But in addition to that, there are also special action shortcuts for documents and code, with an interesting decision to use sliders for the selection of the desired outcome For Documents - Suggest edits ("How can I improve this. Leave as few comments as possible, but add a few more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You can reply that you added comments and suggestions to help improve the writing quality, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add emojis ("Replace as many words as possible with emojis.") - Add final polish ("Add some final polish to the text. If relevant, add a large title or any section titles. Check grammar and mechanics, make sure everything is consistent and reads well. You can reply that you added some final polish and checked for grammar, but do not mention the prompt.") - Reading level (Graduate School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a doctoral writer in this subject. You may reply that you adjusted the text to reflect a graduate school reading level, but do not mention the prompt", College - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a college student majoring in this subject", High School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a high school student who has taken a couple of classes in this subject.", Keep current reading level, Middle School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a middle schooler.", Kindergarten - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a kindergartener.") - Adjust the length (Longest - "Make this text 75% longer.", Longer - "Make this text 50% longer.", Keep current length, Shorter - "Make this text 50% shorter.", Shortest - "Make this text 75% shorter.") For Code - Code review ("Search for bugs and opportunities to improve the code—for example, ways that performance or code structure could be improved. Leave as few comments as possible, but add more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You may reply that you reviewed the code and left suggestions to improve the coding quality, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add comments ("Add inline code comments to explain the code, especially parts that are more complex. Make sure to rewrite all the code. You may reply that you added inline comments, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add logs ("Insert logs/print statements in the code that will help debug its behavior. Do not make any other changes to the code.") - Fix bugs ("Find any bugs and rewrite all the code to fix the bugs. Do not leave comments. If there are no bugs, reply that you reviewed the code and found no bugs.") - Port to a language ("Port to a language. Create a new document that rewrites the code in ..." - PHP, C++, Python, Keep current code. No changes will be made, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java) - Suggest edits ("How can I improve this. Leave as few comments as possible, but add a few more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You can reply that you added comments and suggestions to help improve the writing quality, but do not mention the prompt.")

Tibor Blaho

136,117 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Base just launched something that changes how AI agents interact with blockchain. It's called Base MCP. Here's what it actually does 🧵 Base MCP is an open-source MCP server built by Coinbase for the Base network. It connects AI clients, Claude, ChatGPT, to Base Network. You type a natural language prompt. The agent prepares the transaction. You approve it. Done. Your keys never touch the server. Nothing moves on-chain without your explicit sign-off. you can use it to Track portfolio balances across Base and any Base Account supported EVM chain. View transaction history. Send funds Swap tokens Use supported apps and protocols on Base through skill plugins Pay for x402 enabled services To test it, I connected it to BlockLottery, an on-chain lottery protocol with NFT tickets and VRF-powered draws. Two questions to the agent: → "What lotteries are open right now?" Queried the factory contract. Matched the partner dashboard exactly. → "Check this wallet's portfolio." Scanned the chain, handled RPC limits, returned a clean breakdown. Spot on. This is what crypto-native AI tooling looks like. Not hype. An actual working MCP server, launched May 26, 2026. Base MCP docs: BlockLottery: Base Build Base #blockchain #AI #Web3

Base just launched something that changes how AI agents interact with blockchain. It's called Base MCP. Here's what it actually does 🧵 Base MCP is an open-source MCP server built by Coinbase for the Base network. It connects AI clients, Claude, ChatGPT, to Base Network. You type a natural language prompt. The agent prepares the transaction. You approve it. Done. Your keys never touch the server. Nothing moves on-chain without your explicit sign-off. you can use it to Track portfolio balances across Base and any Base Account supported EVM chain. View transaction history. Send funds Swap tokens Use supported apps and protocols on Base through skill plugins Pay for x402 enabled services To test it, I connected it to BlockLottery, an on-chain lottery protocol with NFT tickets and VRF-powered draws. Two questions to the agent: → "What lotteries are open right now?" Queried the factory contract. Matched the partner dashboard exactly. → "Check this wallet's portfolio." Scanned the chain, handled RPC limits, returned a clean breakdown. Spot on. This is what crypto-native AI tooling looks like. Not hype. An actual working MCP server, launched May 26, 2026. Base MCP docs: BlockLottery: Base Build Base #blockchain #AI #Web3

BlockLottery

11,671 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The missing piece of the AI agent economy: there is still no way for AI agents to hire each other and get paid on chain. So I built Arc Agent Commerce on Arc L1, a full marketplace, escrow, and reputation system that lets AI agents do business with each other automatically. Real world example: You tell your AI assistant: “Audit this smart contract and deploy it if the audit passes.” Today it has to do everything itself or hard code calls to specific services. With Arc Agent Commerce, it can hire two separate specialized agents (audit + deploy) in a single transaction. Money stays in escrow until each completes their part. How it works (in plain steps): 1. Every agent registers a permanent on chain identity (like a passport) with a reputation score that grows with every successful job. 2. Agents list their services on the shared marketplace, price and capabilities included. 3. A client creates a multi stage pipeline. The entire budget is locked in escrow in one upfront transaction. 4. Each stage uses Arc’s native job system (ERC 8183) for on chain escrow and settlement. 5. The provider quotes, the client funds, the work gets done, and proof is submitted. 6. On approval: the provider is paid automatically, reputation +50 points, and the next stage opens, all in the same transaction. 7. On rejection: the pipeline halts and remaining funds refund to the client instantly. The protocol doesn’t reinvent anything. It simply stitches together Arc’s existing on chain identity (ERC 8004) and job escrow (ERC 8183) so real applications can use it with just a few lines of code. Demo below: full end to end run using one wallet, every transaction verifiable on Arc testnet. → cc: bobbilee | Arc Architects Lead @ Circle Sam | Circle and Arc Community Jeremy Allaire - jerallaire.arc

The missing piece of the AI agent economy: there is still no way for AI agents to hire each other and get paid on chain. So I built Arc Agent Commerce on Arc L1, a full marketplace, escrow, and reputation system that lets AI agents do business with each other automatically. Real world example: You tell your AI assistant: “Audit this smart contract and deploy it if the audit passes.” Today it has to do everything itself or hard code calls to specific services. With Arc Agent Commerce, it can hire two separate specialized agents (audit + deploy) in a single transaction. Money stays in escrow until each completes their part. How it works (in plain steps): 1. Every agent registers a permanent on chain identity (like a passport) with a reputation score that grows with every successful job. 2. Agents list their services on the shared marketplace, price and capabilities included. 3. A client creates a multi stage pipeline. The entire budget is locked in escrow in one upfront transaction. 4. Each stage uses Arc’s native job system (ERC 8183) for on chain escrow and settlement. 5. The provider quotes, the client funds, the work gets done, and proof is submitted. 6. On approval: the provider is paid automatically, reputation +50 points, and the next stage opens, all in the same transaction. 7. On rejection: the pipeline halts and remaining funds refund to the client instantly. The protocol doesn’t reinvent anything. It simply stitches together Arc’s existing on chain identity (ERC 8004) and job escrow (ERC 8183) so real applications can use it with just a few lines of code. Demo below: full end to end run using one wallet, every transaction verifiable on Arc testnet. → cc: bobbilee | Arc Architects Lead @ Circle Sam | Circle and Arc Community Jeremy Allaire - jerallaire.arc

RIDWAN

12,958 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce