Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨SEC WANTS BLOCKCHAIN IN OFFICIAL SHARE TRANSFERS! Transfer agents keep the official list of who owns a stock. Those rules have barely moved since the 1970s, when shares still moved on paper. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission just proposed rewriting them so agents can use electronic records and...

14,137 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

What Does Injective Becoming a SEC-Registered Transfer Agent Mean? Injective (Injective 🥷) Institutional Services, an Injective affiliate, is now registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a transfer agent. This is significant because a transfer agent handles one of the most important parts of traditional securities markets: the official record of who owns an asset. (1) It brings regulated ownership records into Injective’s ecosystem. A transfer agent maintains ownership records, processes changes in ownership, and supports distributions, voting rights and corporate actions. That means Injective is moving beyond simply providing blockchain infrastructure for tokenized assets. (2) It could bring securities recordkeeping closer to the blockchain. The SEC has said registered transfer agents can use distributed ledger technology as their official master securityholder file, subject to federal securities laws. This creates a potential path where the onchain ownership record can become part of the authoritative securities record. (3) Injective Mint handles another important piece of the puzzle. Its tokenization platform allows issuers to create assets with restrictions around holders, jurisdictions, transfers, minting and redemption. Approved wallets can also be managed through compliance controls and allowlists. (4) The registration does not make every Injective asset a security. The registration applies to Injective Institutional Services and its regulated transfer agent functions. Individual tokenized products still need their own legal structures and must comply with applicable securities regulations. (5) Injective is building on an existing tokenization track record. The network already supports tokenized funds, equities, private markets and trade finance applications. The new registration adds a regulated recordkeeping layer to that existing infrastructure. This could become increasingly important as financial institutions move from simply issuing tokenized assets toward building fully functional onchain capital markets.

BSCN

17,892 views • 18 days ago

🚨 THE NEXT MONETARY WAR BETWEEN U.S. and CHINA HAS ALREADY STARTED The U.S. is betting on Digital Dollars (Stablecoins) while China is betting on physical gold. Trump and the Treasury just admitted the quiet part out loud. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: We will keep the dollar as the world’s reserve currency and will use stablecoins to do it. Trump’s January 2025 order made dollar-backed coins official policy. The GENIUS Act locked the mechanism in: every compliant stablecoin must sit 1-for-1 on cash, T-bills, and Treasury repos. That’s the escape hatch. America can’t print gold. It can print demand for its own debt. How it works: Billions of people who will never open a U.S. bank account can hold a dollar token. Every new token forces the issuer to buy short-term Treasuries. Dollar demand gets exported on crypto rails. The reserve currency survives even if SWIFT loses corridors because the world is still holding a claim on U.S. paper. It’s not a gold standard. It’s a digital T-bill standard wearing a crypto costume. Meanwhile China is doing the opposite: The PBOC just posted its 21st straight month of gold buying. Official holdings: ~2,366 tonnes. They’re stacking metal like the clock is running out. Hong Kong already opened the first offshore Shanghai Gold Exchange vault. The city wants 2,000+ tonnes of storage. More vaults are being scoped for Singapore, Dubai, Riyadh, Moscow. The pitch is simple: hold yuan, convert it to gold you can actually take delivery of. That’s the old-school play. Physical collateral. Offshore vaults. Yuan contracts settled in metal, not promises. Two strategies. Same problem. The London Metal Exchange (LME) Treasury Chief Just Quit London For The Crypto Firm “Ripple” For Tokenized Commodities on XRP Ledger As China Builds a Yuan-Gold Vault Settlement System. That product is already live. Assetiko gold XAUa and silver XAGa on the XRP Ledger. Swap metal to native XRP on Trensik without leaving the book. The U.S. is trying to keep the dollar’s privilege by turning private coins into a global bid for Treasuries. China is trying to leave the privilege by stacking gold and building a vault-and-settlement network that doesn’t need Washington’s permission. One side is digitizing the debt. The other is hoarding the metal. Watch which one the rest of the world actually trusts when the next shock hits.

Stern Drew

408,540 views • 4 days ago

🚨 THE NEXT MONETARY WAR BETWEEN THE U.S. AND CHINA HAS ALREADY STARTED THE U.S. IS BETTING ON DIGITAL DOLLARS (STABLECOINS) - CHINA IS BETTING ON PHYSICAL GOLD. Trump and the Treasury have now said the quiet part out loud. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "We will keep the dollar as the world's reserve currency and will use stablecoins to do it." Trump's January 2025 order put dollar-backed stablecoins at the center of U.S. policy. The GENIUS Act then formalized the structure: compliant stablecoins must be backed 1-for-1 by cash, T-bills, and Treasury repos. THAT'S THE KEY. AMERICA CAN'T PRINT GOLD. BUT IT CAN CREATE NEW DEMAND FOR ITS OWN DEBT. Here's how it works: Billions of people who may never open a U.S. bank account can still hold a digital dollar token. As stablecoin supply grows, issuers need more reserve assets - including short-term Treasuries. Dollar demand gets pushed onto crypto rails, helping extend the reach of the dollar beyond the traditional banking system. IT'S NOT A GOLD STANDARD. IT'S CLOSER TO A DIGITAL T-BILL STANDARD WRAPPED IN CRYPTO. Meanwhile, China is moving in the opposite direction. The PBOC just posted its 21st straight month of gold buying. Official holdings: ~2,366 tonnes. They're accumulating physical metal at a remarkable pace. Hong Kong has already opened the first offshore Shanghai Gold Exchange vault. The city is targeting 2,000+ tonnes of storage, while additional vault locations are being explored in Singapore, Dubai, Riyadh, and Moscow. The idea is simple: hold yuan, then convert it into gold that can actually be delivered. Physical collateral. Offshore vaults. Yuan-linked settlement backed by metal rather than promises. TWO DIFFERENT STRATEGIES. ONE BIG PROBLEM. At the same time, the London Metal Exchange's Treasury chief has moved to a crypto firm focused on tokenized commodities - while China continues building out a yuan-gold settlement network. ONE SIDE IS DIGITIZING THE DEBT - THE OTHER IS ACCUMULATING THE METAL. The real question is which system the rest of the world will trust more when the next major shock arrives!👀

DANNY

219,622 views • 2 days ago

We all remember. We all remember when blockchain was pitched as the next big thing. And today, we feel like we’ve been waiting and waiting. Until recently, Blockchain was too expensive, slow under load, and hard to integrate for most businesses. So enterprises ignored it. It didn’t solve their business problems. That’s changed. Why blockchain, why now? Businesses don’t care about the tech, they care about cost and performance. They’d ask a simple question “Does it save or make me more money?” For a long time, blockchain didn’t clearly do this. That’s no longer true. Blockchain is proving real business cases, especially on Avalanche. On Avalanche, transactions cost fractions of a cent. settle in about a second. And instead of forcing everything onto one shared chain, businesses can launch their own Avalanche L1s with their own rules. To understand this let’s identify the problem and then provide the solution in a way that's easy to understand. Where Businesses Lose Money Most large industries lose money due to operational inefficiencies. Data lives in different systems. Teams spend hours reconciling records that should already match. Intermediaries sit in the middle, taking fees to coordinate all of it. Individually, each step looks small. Together, they create real cost: > Labor spent on manual processes > Capital locked up during settlement delays > Fees paid to intermediaries > Risk introduced by time gaps and mismatched data This is where businesses actually lose money. Not in big, obvious ways. In constant, compounding friction. Take Private Credit, for Example Private credit is loans held outside of traditional banks. It’s a multi-trillion dollar market, and much of it still runs on spreadsheets and weekly reconciliation processes. Loan data is tracked across systems. Teams manually process requests. Funds move on traditional rails, often on delayed cycles. It doesn’t have to be this way Entire teams exist just to keep systems in sync. Now move that system onto Avalanche. Loan data updates in real time. Transactions settle in about a second. Every participant sees the same state instantly. Reconciliation isn’t a separate step because the system itself is the source of truth. The impact is straightforward. > Reduced manual work > Shortened settlement cycles > Fewer layers of coordination between parties Avalanche is Infrastructure for Real Businesses Avalanche is designed to match how businesses actually operate. Instead of sharing a single chain, they can launch their own Avalanche L1s with custom rules, built-in compliance, and predictable performance. They control the system. Avalanche’s Moment For the longest time, blockchain naysayers said this could all be done better with spreadsheets or existing systems. They were right. That’s what the technology allowed. Now it’s changed. Avalanche can replace many of those systems with real-time settlement, shared data, and automated execution. For the first time, the economics work. Built for business. 🔺

Avalanche🔺

13,140 views • 5 months ago

HTML Artifacts are a big part of how I work with agents now. Artifacts can be more than just static files. When combined with agents, they can take action or help you take action. This unlocks all kinds of interesting ways to work with agents. This is clearly the future. Check out this writing and scheduler artifact I built in a few minutes. It uses a bit of HTML and JS. All the data is in markdown (Obsidian vaults), so the agent can access and modify it at any time. No DB needed. No sophisticated functionalities. The agent decides all that for me based on the skills, context, and memory it has access to. The best part about this simple stack is that all the important information stays with me. This has allowed me to build a recursive self-improving system and automations that can better tap into coding agents like Codex or Claude Code. I could have paid or built an entire app for scheduling posts, and there are so many of them out there. But I don't need to. I've realized a simple artifact does the job. And the simplicity of it is actually an advantage. Very little maintenance for very high returns on personalization, time, and efficiency. The other benefit of this is that I can add features as I please. That level of personalization feels magical, and we should all be pursuing more of it. All of this just keeps compounding. Of course, this example is just about writing. But I have similar artifacts for research, design, experimentation, evaluation, and so much more. And no, I didn't actually publish the post example I shared in the clip. It was just for demonstration purposes. I actually spend more time than this when writing together with agents. Lastly, having built my own agent orchestrator tool has made me realize that simplifying the tool stack is a superpower. If you are curious about how all this works, I will do a live session next week:

elvis

18,374 views • 3 months ago

I just built my own wiki generator plugin for my agents. My agents can now generate wikis for anything I ask. One of my favorite wikis is called PaperWiki. This is a great example of what Andrej Karpathy describes. It uses obsidian vaults to organize papers, retrieve LLM-generated summaries, diagrams, and other advanced views for paper exploration. When Obsidian UI is not enough, I use my own artifact generator inside my agent orchestrator (see clip for example). This allows my agents to build any kind of view or exploration feature that I need. The papers are all curated with automations and several rules/patterns I have manually built over the years. On the surface, this looks basic. But behind the scenes, there are advanced search capabilities, connections, metadata, derived data, and other interesting bits of information that are extremely useful for my research agents. This is mostly built for agents. The artifact preview is just a high-level way to validate and quickly assess the quality of the wiki, suggest improvements, and it's also great for research. I use tobi lutke's qmd for all search capabilities. Everything is markdown. The summaries and even the diagrams. The wiki updates on its own based on several automations I have optimized over the past couple of weeks. The wiki grows and self-improves based on several requirements important for my research use cases. This is as personalized as it gets. There is nothing like it out there. And I use my research expertise to continue improving it over time. This is a vanilla wiki. There are so many things I want to build on top of this. Different aggregations, views, artifacts, etc. All to help automate more of my research work and accelerate productivity. I think the biggest leverage here is how powerful this could be for discovery and experimentation. One of my goals is to use it to find deeper connections and insights that would otherwise elude the top human researchers and use those to generate interesting new hypotheses and research experiments. That way, my agents can use autoresearch to explore research ideas at the frontier. Stay tuned for more.

elvis

67,257 views • 5 months ago

There’s a reason the LimeWire name still hits people instantly. If you were around in the early internet days, LimeWire was everywhere. Music discovery, file sharing, chaos, excitement. It shaped how a whole generation interacted with the web. That kind of brand memory doesn’t fade and LimeWire is proving it can be reused in a serious way. What’s different now is the foundation. LimeWire Network is the decentralized storage layer of LimeWire, built on BNB Chain. It is not a nostalgia project. It is infrastructure. Storage, transfers, and usage are happening on chain, designed to scale for real applications rather than demos. The growth backs that up. Looking at recent data on lmwrscan, LimeWire Network has already moved into tens of terabytes of stored data, with tens of thousands of uploads and consistent daily activity. Network usage keeps climbing, not spiking once and disappearing. That kind of curve usually shows real users, not incentive farming. And the economics are clear. The $LMWR token sits at the center of the system. Users pay in LMWR to use storage. Node operators earn LMWR for providing resources. Rewards and payments stay inside the ecosystem instead of leaking out to third parties. That loop matters. Most decentralized storage networks struggle because nobody knows they exist. LimeWire doesn’t have that problem. The brand alone opens doors, pulls attention, and lowers the friction for new users to try the product. When you combine that with live usage data and a functioning token economy, the upside starts to look asymmetric. Built on BNB Chain, LimeWire Network also gets the scalability needed if adoption keeps accelerating. That choice signals intent to grow, not just experiment. This feels like a rare case where nostalgia is not the product, it is the distribution layer. Curious how you see it. Are you watching LimeWire because of the brand comeback, the LimeWire Network growth, or the role of the LMWR token in the long run?

ryu 龙

25,416 views • 7 months ago