Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Second Amendment Checkmate? The Left, Gun Bans & Court Battles 🚨I break down a controversial strategy: Could Democrats’ stance on gun bans backfire when it comes to the courts and the Second Amendment? Is this a political checkmate or a dangerous gamble? 🔥 🎧 Full episode here 👉

Alex Marlow

64,863 subscribers

23,047 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

REPORTER: Following that shooting at Florida State University, is there any changes that you want to see with gun legislation? TRUMP: I have a, an obligation to protect the Second Amendment. I ran on the Second Amendment among many other things, and I will always protect the Second Amendment….I'm a big advocate of the Second Amendment. I have been from the beginning, I protected it and these things are terrible, but the gun doesn't do the shooting, the people do.

REPORTER: Following that shooting at Florida State University, is there any changes that you want to see with gun legislation? TRUMP: I have a, an obligation to protect the Second Amendment. I ran on the Second Amendment among many other things, and I will always protect the Second Amendment….I'm a big advocate of the Second Amendment. I have been from the beginning, I protected it and these things are terrible, but the gun doesn't do the shooting, the people do.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

519,760 views • 1 year ago

The Democrat Party can’t be trusted with gun bans. Democrats history on gun bans is proof.

The Democrat Party can’t be trusted with gun bans. Democrats history on gun bans is proof.

Dr. Interracial 🇺🇸

881,126 views • 3 years ago

ALERT: Supreme Court will consider whether bans on semiautomatic guns violate Second Amendment rights. The Supreme Court will hear from Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois, home to Chicago, groups on their bans on “assault weapons.” Cutberto Viramontes and Christopher Khaya have challenged the ban in Cook County along with Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation. The Connecticut Citizens Defense League, the Second Amendment Foundation, and 3 citizens have challenged the ban in Connecticut. Lower courts have upheld the laws that ban these “assault weapons” as groups argue they are in violation of their Second Amendment rights.

ALERT: Supreme Court will consider whether bans on semiautomatic guns violate Second Amendment rights. The Supreme Court will hear from Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois, home to Chicago, groups on their bans on “assault weapons.” Cutberto Viramontes and Christopher Khaya have challenged the ban in Cook County along with Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation. The Connecticut Citizens Defense League, the Second Amendment Foundation, and 3 citizens have challenged the ban in Connecticut. Lower courts have upheld the laws that ban these “assault weapons” as groups argue they are in violation of their Second Amendment rights.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

54,340 views • 12 days ago

Nick discusses his stance on the Second Amendment with Steven Crowder. "I'm ideologically in favor of the Second Amendment... I just think there's a limit to it."

Nick discusses his stance on the Second Amendment with Steven Crowder. "I'm ideologically in favor of the Second Amendment... I just think there's a limit to it."

Fuentes Updates

64,420 views • 7 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT A GUN DEBATE. IT'S A POWER DEBATE. The Minnesota man seen armed against ICE is a reminder that the Second Amendment exists because power overreaches. If the government can use lethal force without consequence, what limits it?

🚨🇺🇸 THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT A GUN DEBATE. IT'S A POWER DEBATE. The Minnesota man seen armed against ICE is a reminder that the Second Amendment exists because power overreaches. If the government can use lethal force without consequence, what limits it?

AMANI

23,355 views • 5 months ago

Donald Trump is a gun grabber who does not believe in the Second Amendment.

Donald Trump is a gun grabber who does not believe in the Second Amendment.

Steve Schmidt

13,088 views • 5 months ago

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the Second Amendment against calls for gun control on CBS. THREE TIMES he shut down the anti-gun reporter. This is what gun owners want to see from a pro-gun Attorney General. No compromise!

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the Second Amendment against calls for gun control on CBS. THREE TIMES he shut down the anti-gun reporter. This is what gun owners want to see from a pro-gun Attorney General. No compromise!

Gun Owners of America

16,678 views • 2 months ago

The Senate Democrats dropped a hit piece this week attacking gun owners, the Second Amendment, and common firearm accessories. It was loaded with lies and emotional manipulation—but GOA’s Erich Pratt is here to set the record straight.🔥 Watch the Fact Check:⤵️

The Senate Democrats dropped a hit piece this week attacking gun owners, the Second Amendment, and common firearm accessories. It was loaded with lies and emotional manipulation—but GOA’s Erich Pratt is here to set the record straight.🔥 Watch the Fact Check:⤵️

Gun Owners of America

26,016 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Supreme Court unanimously sides with the 2nd Amendment The Supreme Court rules 9-0 saying you can’t disqualify someone from owning a gun because they’re a drug user “It was whether or not you could go after someone who you discovered was a habitual drug user, in this case marijuana, and that disqualified them from owning or possessing a gun” “The court has got a unanimous opinion — nobody's dissenting here, saying that the prosecution of this individual or going after this individual based on his drug usage and gun ownership violates the Second Amendment” Keep in mind this doesn’t mean you can possess the gun while intoxicated on the drug, this just means you can’t be targeted for owning it

NEW: Supreme Court unanimously sides with the 2nd Amendment The Supreme Court rules 9-0 saying you can’t disqualify someone from owning a gun because they’re a drug user “It was whether or not you could go after someone who you discovered was a habitual drug user, in this case marijuana, and that disqualified them from owning or possessing a gun” “The court has got a unanimous opinion — nobody's dissenting here, saying that the prosecution of this individual or going after this individual based on his drug usage and gun ownership violates the Second Amendment” Keep in mind this doesn’t mean you can possess the gun while intoxicated on the drug, this just means you can’t be targeted for owning it

Wall Street Apes

151,975 views • 24 days ago

It is a false choice to suggest that you either favor the Second Amendment OR want reasonable gun safety laws—we can do both.

It is a false choice to suggest that you either favor the Second Amendment OR want reasonable gun safety laws—we can do both.

Kamala Harris

257,746 views • 2 years ago

It is a false choice to suggest that you either favor the Second Amendment OR want reasonable gun safety laws—we can do both.

It is a false choice to suggest that you either favor the Second Amendment OR want reasonable gun safety laws—we can do both.

Kamala Harris

520,406 views • 2 years ago

The unconstitutional and archaic tax on the Second Amendment is one step closer to being a thing of the past.🔥 This is a HUGE victory for the gun community and a blow to the gun control agenda. THANK YOU to all members and supporters who helped us get this far.🙏

The unconstitutional and archaic tax on the Second Amendment is one step closer to being a thing of the past.🔥 This is a HUGE victory for the gun community and a blow to the gun control agenda. THANK YOU to all members and supporters who helped us get this far.🙏

Gun Owners of America

50,686 views • 1 year ago

It is a false choice to suggest that we must either support the Second Amendment or pass reasonable gun safety laws. We can do both.

It is a false choice to suggest that we must either support the Second Amendment or pass reasonable gun safety laws. We can do both.

Kamala Harris

496,629 views • 2 years ago

ICYMI: On November 11th, we issued a statement calling on the President to immediately direct his DOJ to end its defense of federal gun control laws and to begin using the full power of the executive branch to actively protect and advance the 2A rights of the American people. The pattern of anti-Second Amendment litigation in challenges to federal gun bans is a deliberate choice and must come to an end.

ICYMI: On November 11th, we issued a statement calling on the President to immediately direct his DOJ to end its defense of federal gun control laws and to begin using the full power of the executive branch to actively protect and advance the 2A rights of the American people. The pattern of anti-Second Amendment litigation in challenges to federal gun bans is a deliberate choice and must come to an end.

Firearms Policy Coalition

16,823 views • 7 months ago

Biden: "I'm a Second Amendment guy...everybody thinks somehow the Second Amendment is absolute! You're not allowed to go out and own an automatic weapon. You're not allowed to own a machine gun. You're not allowed to own a flamethrower!"

Biden: "I'm a Second Amendment guy...everybody thinks somehow the Second Amendment is absolute! You're not allowed to go out and own an automatic weapon. You're not allowed to own a machine gun. You're not allowed to own a flamethrower!"

Daily Wire

1,819,998 views • 3 years ago

A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Good win. But that’s not even the biggest part. The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years. Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories. Not arms. Not protected. Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle. But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said: No. If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment. That creates a problem. A big one. Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions. That’s called a circuit split. And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in. So this isn’t just about suppressors. This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep. Now be honest: Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment? Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.

A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Good win. But that’s not even the biggest part. The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years. Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories. Not arms. Not protected. Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle. But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said: No. If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment. That creates a problem. A big one. Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions. That’s called a circuit split. And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in. So this isn’t just about suppressors. This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep. Now be honest: Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment? Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.

Colion Noir

51,015 views • 16 days ago

The pro-gun Democrat is nearly extinct. Once a staple of rural and blue-collar America, the party’s Second Amendment wing has been purged and replaced by anti-gun activists. Do you think pro-gun Democrats still exist? Should they?🤔

The pro-gun Democrat is nearly extinct. Once a staple of rural and blue-collar America, the party’s Second Amendment wing has been purged and replaced by anti-gun activists. Do you think pro-gun Democrats still exist? Should they?🤔

Gun Owners of America

12,906 views • 1 month ago

This is 100% correct. All gun laws are unconstitutional. The Second Amendment is our carry permit.

This is 100% correct. All gun laws are unconstitutional. The Second Amendment is our carry permit.

Alexander Duncan

58,791 views • 5 months ago

Missouri's Second Amendment Protection Act is dead at SCOTUS—a tragedy for Missouri gun owners and for gun owners nationwide.

Missouri's Second Amendment Protection Act is dead at SCOTUS—a tragedy for Missouri gun owners and for gun owners nationwide.

Gun Owners of America

113,357 views • 7 months ago

The Second Amendment shouldn't require a permission slip, and all gun laws are infringements. Shall not be infringed.

The Second Amendment shouldn't require a permission slip, and all gun laws are infringements. Shall not be infringed.

Gun Owners of America

46,708 views • 4 months ago