正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast,... dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.show more

Latte

7,352 subscribers

167,558 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,612 次观看 • 3 个月前

Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0, Which one is better? Every single shot was generated using the exact same base image and identical prompt.

Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0, Which one is better? Every single shot was generated using the exact same base image and identical prompt.

Dinda Prasetyo

86,524 次观看 • 4 个月前

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

Seedance 2.0 vs. Kling 3.0: Who delivers the most realistic emotional expressions? I put both models through the same test using one character, one reference image, and the exact same prompt. Each generated four emotions: anger, sadness, happiness, and disgust. Which AI video model handled the emotions better ?

FATHELA ESQ

38,486 次观看 • 8 天前

I just tested a small AI animation pipeline and the results honestly surprised me. Workflow I used: Midjourney → character & scene design Nano Banana Pro → image refinement / realism Seedance 2.0 → animation and cinematic motion CapCut - Stitch Them Together The result actually feels like a mini animated short film, not just AI clips stitched together. The environment detail, character motion, and lighting transitions came out way more cinematic than I expected. Curious what you guys think — are tools like Seedance 2.0 getting close to real animated storytelling?

I just tested a small AI animation pipeline and the results honestly surprised me. Workflow I used: Midjourney → character & scene design Nano Banana Pro → image refinement / realism Seedance 2.0 → animation and cinematic motion CapCut - Stitch Them Together The result actually feels like a mini animated short film, not just AI clips stitched together. The environment detail, character motion, and lighting transitions came out way more cinematic than I expected. Curious what you guys think — are tools like Seedance 2.0 getting close to real animated storytelling?

Isabella

12,577 次观看 • 19 天前

The Ultimate Creation Debate Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 Same prompt. Same image. Both platforms can now generate an entire story from just ONE IMAGE. That’s a huge step forward. Comment Seedance or Kling. DM me if you want the prompt. #AIvideo #Seedance #KlingAI #GenerativeAI #AItools #AIcreator

The Ultimate Creation Debate Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 Same prompt. Same image. Both platforms can now generate an entire story from just ONE IMAGE. That’s a huge step forward. Comment Seedance or Kling. DM me if you want the prompt. #AIvideo #Seedance #KlingAI #GenerativeAI #AItools #AIcreator

erich3D.com

11,335 次观看 • 2 个月前

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Kōda

34,741 次观看 • 1 个月前

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Curious Refuge

58,038 次观看 • 4 个月前

Still choosing the right AI video model? You don’t have to. Same prompt. Kling 3.0. Seedance 2.0. StarDream 2.0. Different strengths. Different results. All in one place — SeaArt

Still choosing the right AI video model? You don’t have to. Same prompt. Kling 3.0. Seedance 2.0. StarDream 2.0. Different strengths. Different results. All in one place — SeaArt

SeaArt.Ai🐋

22,771 次观看 • 18 天前

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

Dinda Prasetyo

45,450 次观看 • 4 个月前

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and Seedance 2.0.

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and Seedance 2.0.

Jibril

113,346 次观看 • 2 个月前

SEEDANCE 2 vs FAST vs MINI Seedance 2.0 mini just went live on CapCut and I tested the exact same storyboard for reference and prompt to see which one performs best. And the difference is actually crazy 😳 Which one do you think came out on top? 👀 #CapcutSeedance2

SEEDANCE 2 vs FAST vs MINI Seedance 2.0 mini just went live on CapCut and I tested the exact same storyboard for reference and prompt to see which one performs best. And the difference is actually crazy 😳 Which one do you think came out on top? 👀 #CapcutSeedance2

MrDejie

133,840 次观看 • 21 天前

What Kling 3.0 & Seedance 2.0, two Chinese AI video models, created using the same prompts. We are in an era that everyone can make a film.

What Kling 3.0 & Seedance 2.0, two Chinese AI video models, created using the same prompts. We are in an era that everyone can make a film.

Li Zexin 李泽欣

14,467 次观看 • 4 个月前

Google DeepMind Just tested Gemini Omni Flash against Seedance 2.0 right after the launch 👀 We ran the same prompts side-by-side to compare real generation quality, motion, and consistency. Sharing the results here ↓

Google DeepMind Just tested Gemini Omni Flash against Seedance 2.0 right after the launch 👀 We ran the same prompts side-by-side to compare real generation quality, motion, and consistency. Sharing the results here ↓

TopviewAI

24,787 次观看 • 1 个月前

amazing test! of a very difficult scene that requires a lot of time and money in the film industry. 🤯 Testing software: -Cinema Studio 2.5 -Seedance 2.0 -Kling 3.0 -Grok 1.0 seedance and grok in comments:

amazing test! of a very difficult scene that requires a lot of time and money in the film industry. 🤯 Testing software: -Cinema Studio 2.5 -Seedance 2.0 -Kling 3.0 -Grok 1.0 seedance and grok in comments:

hedoήist

18,066 次观看 • 3 个月前

Seedance 2.0 is now in HeyGen Everyone's using Seedance to generate cinematic video with any character. We just made that character you. Introducing Avatar Shots - your likeness, consistent across scenes. Dynamic motion. Multiple avatars in the same shot. Same face. Way more range. Only available through business email verification for all regions except US and Japan. RT + comment "SEEDANCE" for 100 HeyGen credits (must follow)

Joshua Xu

599,721 次观看 • 3 个月前

Check out our latest AI video comparison! This time we're putting Kling 1.6 head-to-head with Luma's new Ray2 image-to-video feature. We used the same image and the same prompt for both ("subtle camera movement, natural motion"), just like in our recent Pika 2.1 test. The results? Super interesting! Ray2 brings more dynamic motion and cinematic colors to the table, though with some distortion, while Kling keeps its reputation for solid quality and stability. Love seeing these different approaches to the same challenge. Which one do you like better?

Check out our latest AI video comparison! This time we're putting Kling 1.6 head-to-head with Luma's new Ray2 image-to-video feature. We used the same image and the same prompt for both ("subtle camera movement, natural motion"), just like in our recent Pika 2.1 test. The results? Super interesting! Ray2 brings more dynamic motion and cinematic colors to the table, though with some distortion, while Kling keeps its reputation for solid quality and stability. Love seeing these different approaches to the same challenge. Which one do you like better?

Curious Refuge

42,151 次观看 • 1 年前

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,402 次观看 • 4 个月前

In 1999, we were just watching The Matrix. Now the red pill is in our hands. Thanks to AI, we’re no longer just the audience, we’re inside the scene. With Kling 3.0 + Seedance 2.0, I gave Neo and Trinity a little backup in the lobby scene. 😎🎬

In 1999, we were just watching The Matrix. Now the red pill is in our hands. Thanks to AI, we’re no longer just the audience, we’re inside the scene. With Kling 3.0 + Seedance 2.0, I gave Neo and Trinity a little backup in the lobby scene. 😎🎬

Nuri Yıldız

12,444 次观看 • 2 个月前

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

VoxelPlot

125,303 次观看 • 2 个月前

This shouldn’t look this consistent from a single image. But Magnific Seedance 2.0 pulled it off. The motion, camera feel, and scene consistency are on another level 👇

This shouldn’t look this consistent from a single image. But Magnific Seedance 2.0 pulled it off. The motion, camera feel, and scene consistency are on another level 👇

Md Naimul Kadir

43,754 次观看 • 1 个月前