Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan's Recall: Verification Process Would Have Begun if Petitioners' Signatures Reached Threshold - Eta-Messi INEC cannot rely on information from social media. The law clearly outlines the processes required for a recall to be valid. The first step we took was to verify whether the signatures met the...

51,606 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von ben samuel
ben samuelvor 1 Jahr

INEC conveniently turned a blind eye to clear video evidence of forgery. This same INEC, despite having vast resources, struggled for years to get just 106,000 people to vote for five candidates on election day. Yet, somehow, they magically collected 250,000 signatures in just one week. Do these people even think? They sold us a dummy with BVAS and then introduced a "technical glitch" on election day. Until we have a truly independent electoral body, these people will keep destroying the country and getting away with it. Meanwhile, just today, South Korea’s court removed a president for violating their constitution. Yet, INEC remains untouchable despite its glaring incompetence.

Profilbild von republicEn.org
republicEn.orgvor 2 Jahren

I'm not a Liberal, but I care about climate change. Click the video below & sign the Petition: Conservative Climate Leadership in America. 🇺🇸

Profilbild von Pharm Roy
Pharm Royvor 1 Jahr

So even when you know that the signatures were forged or obtained through fraudulent means you have go ahead to next step had it been they reach the threshold? Are you ok ma'am? I still maintain, INEC is a criminal organisation.

Profilbild von Benjamin Osho
Benjamin Oshovor 1 Jahr

frankly speaking recall process for any legislator is an exercise in futility

Profilbild von カイ・ゼン Thor-finn
カイ・ゼン Thor-finnvor 1 Jahr

“…regardless of whether they were forged or genuine” 🤦🏾‍♀️

Profilbild von Archivarian Elda Ilya Oyemekun
Archivarian Elda Ilya Oyemekunvor 1 Jahr

Let's leave the story first, ypur name is Messi? Are you married to Lionel Messi?

Profilbild von bassey peter
bassey petervor 1 Jahr

See another animal talk!

Profilbild von 2Bex
2Bexvor 1 Jahr

Y'all don't get it, authentication of those signatures would be after the said threshold signature is achieved, that's when those who signed would be called to their respective polling unit with their voters card and signed again. That's the process it takes

Profilbild von Captain MD🌍
Captain MD🌍vor 1 Jahr

We know naw: Do you! 😂 After electoral reforms or referendum, we will have what to say about INEC…

Profilbild von Mr T.
Mr T.vor 1 Jahr

From what she said, it’s almost impossible to recall Natasha.

Profilbild von PSYCHMAN✳️
PSYCHMAN✳️vor 1 Jahr

So you leave room for possible forgery then take action later? Zero proactive measures to curb the possibility of forgery?

Ähnliche Videos

WOW 🚨 Michigan Democrats are invalidating signatures gathered by residents to block proof of citizenship and voter ID being on their November ballot Americans gathered over 700,000 signatures to put a proposed constitutional amendment in Michigan on the ballot in November for proof of citizenship and voter ID requirement Democrats are rejecting the signatures and claiming they are invalid to block the proposed amendment 709,000 signatures were submitted by Americans for Citizen Voting in Michigan Democrat took 1,000 signatures as a sample. In the sample, 629 needed to be valid to verify the signatures. Democrats said only 624 were valid so they are trying to reject the signatures because of this Democrats invalidated 5 signatures below the required amount, making sure the motion couldn’t move forward But keep in mind, Republicans gathered 709,000. So because Democrats say they were only able to validate 624 of a 1,000 signature sample, they are saying 267,000 of the 709,000 signatures are invalid So because of 5 signatures Democrats invalidated, they are saying that 267,000 signatures must be invalid and trying to reject it being on the ballot We all know the real reason why Democrats made sure to invalidate just enough signatures of the original 1,000 signature samples. They did it to MAKE SURE that a proof of citizenship and voter ID constitutional amendment doesn’t come up for a vote Democrats are rigging our elections

Wall Street Apes

138,360 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Can a sufficiently powerful quantum computer forge the signatures used to authorize Bitcoin and Ethereum transactions? What would it take to upgrade both networks before that happens? In this new lecture, Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh explores why blockchains may turn to signatures built from hash functions. He also presents new research on threshold signing. The talk ends with the questions Bitcoin still has to answer, including whether post-quantum signatures will require larger blocks, what happens to abandoned coins, and how someone such as Satoshi could prove ownership after Bitcoin’s current signatures have been retired. 00:00 Why blockchains need to prepare for quantum computers 03:05 Why Bitcoin may bet on hash-based signatures 06:25 The “big footgun” in stateful signatures 08:58 A quantum-safe signature that takes one billion hashes 14:13 Inside SLH-DSA’s virtual tree 20:30 How Bitcoin and Ethereum could make the switch 23:48 What happens when a wallet loses its state? 32:47 Can threshold signing survive the quantum transition? 36:39 How to hide lattice cryptography from the blockchain 38:49 Why threshold one-time signatures seem impossible 45:36 How context prevents forged signatures 49:37 The forgotten idea behind Winternitz signatures 54:50 Turning one-time signatures into threshold signatures 1:04:27 Will quantum-safe signatures require bigger Bitcoin blocks? 1:06:26 Abandoned bitcoin and Satoshi’s recovery problem

a16z crypto

120,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat