Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Senator Bill Cassidy pressed surgeon general nominee Dr. Nicole Saphier: does the MMR vaccine cause autism? Her answer: "I have not seen reputable evidence that would suggest that vaccines cause autism." Cassidy called that phrasing "wiggle room." Saphier held the same position under repeated questioning: "I do not believe...

11,478 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

28 Kommentare

Profilbild von dimmesdale
dimmesdalevor 5 Tagen

If no evidence of an autism vaccine link in children then remove liability protection and have the claims tried in local courts. Also require insurance companies underwrite them, which will not happen unless big bucks are involved. If no risk, why liability protection?

Profilbild von Gaute Adler Nilsen - Shadowbanning is censorship!
Gaute Adler Nilsen - Shadowbanning is censorship!vor 6 Tagen

Science and medical science should not be politicized. But clearly it is.

Profilbild von Age of Autism
Age of Autismvor 5 Tagen

"I did not have sex with that woman." "There's no evidence of harm." (Because we have not looked.) McKinsey consultant weasel speak.

Profilbild von Newtomee
Newtomeevor 6 Tagen

Carridy is a quack doctor and a bully. Can’t wait for the garbage to be removed.

Profilbild von Melissa Kinney
Melissa Kinneyvor 5 Tagen

I am so glad that Cassidy has lost his seat! Prayers do get answered! Get these evil monsters out! They don’t care about anyone but big Pharma rats pockets for kickbacks.

Profilbild von Rockitz
Rockitzvor 6 Tagen

This S0B Cassidy is the reason why there is not a full MAHA contingent in HHS. Thank God he's out in January.

Profilbild von Michelle K Wood
Michelle K Woodvor 6 Tagen

@SenBillCassidy when two absolute experts under oath in depositions both say there is no proof that vaccines do or do not cause autism, how can you continue to press doctors into lying about it? Stanley Plotkin & Kathryn Edwards both admitted there's no proof they Don't cause it.

Profilbild von L. Tamayo
L. Tamayovor 5 Tagen

Why is a big pharma operative allowed to ask questions at all?

Profilbild von Rebecca Keller🇺🇸
Rebecca Keller🇺🇸vor 6 Tagen

Cassidy is EVIL!!!

Profilbild von Barbara
Barbaravor 6 Tagen

She was a horrible choice.

Profilbild von Chantal Combs
Chantal Combsvor 5 Tagen

She is going to be a worthless schill for Big Pharma, so disappointing

Profilbild von Andrea
Andreavor 5 Tagen

It's ok guys. She reached out to Mary & said "kind words." So what if the MMR has destroyed countless lives & babies shouldn't get the Hep B. She's the best pick thus far! 🤦‍♀️

Profilbild von Donald Gross
Donald Grossvor 6 Tagen

Crap. Another Big Pharma puppet.

Profilbild von HollyB
HollyBvor 5 Tagen

Saphier is a hard NO. She's a disaster for SG and should be NOWHERE near public health policy.

Profilbild von Michael Doherty
Michael Dohertyvor 6 Tagen

Reputable studies from captured scientists

Profilbild von Alison Bacon
Alison Baconvor 5 Tagen

"Not extremely lethal"? Lol!!!! Neither is measles obviously.

Profilbild von BillyDon
BillyDonvor 6 Tagen

She is awesome! Beauty and brains!

Profilbild von Andy Moorish
Andy Moorishvor 5 Tagen

Bend the knee smh

Profilbild von Bruce Boros
Bruce Borosvor 5 Tagen

Don’t cut that bitch any slack she doesn’t deserve it! The only reason she makes it on TV is because she has an attractive look about her but once she opens her mouth, you can see that she’s very ignorant on the topic of “vaccines” it’s such an embarrassment that we continue to have these Talking Heads that don’t realize the repercussions of their ignorance

Profilbild von Callie Allie ✝️🔥
Callie Allie ✝️🔥vor 5 Tagen

They are not going to confirm anyone who says anything else

Profilbild von Moll B
Moll Bvor 5 Tagen

How do we keep getting these awful nominees?

Profilbild von LH
LHvor 5 Tagen

Is this the same Nicole Sapphire that was the resident specialist on Good Morning America? If so, no thanks. She’s just like the rest of them, same politically correct answers that follows the science 😂😂

Profilbild von JBatch
JBatchvor 5 Tagen

She's horrible.

Profilbild von Lest We Forget
Lest We Forgetvor 5 Tagen

I mean... you have to "wiggle" when these Pharmafia thugs question you.

Profilbild von Diotima
Diotimavor 5 Tagen

What Del, RFK and other older males don’t want you to know is that age of the father (40 and over) is the highest risk increase for autism. They fear to implicate old busted sperm (they’re old) and point to the vax. They’re cowards.

Profilbild von The_Revolution
The_Revolutionvor 5 Tagen

So much for MAHA with this clown. @NBSaphierMD

Profilbild von Tinkerbelle2021
Tinkerbelle2021vor 5 Tagen

Both of them lacking where vaccines are concerned.

Profilbild von TheWiseOwl
TheWiseOwlvor 5 Tagen

Cassidy is a has been who is gone shortly - fuck @BillCassidy

Ähnliche Videos

Aaron Siri sued the CDC with one simple demand: Show us the studies that allegedly prove vaccines do not cause autism. Their answer will shock you: “40 to 70% of parents who have a child with autism report that they believe vaccines cause their child’s autism.” “When you ask them what vaccines you think cause your child’s autism, they’ll say the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “On behalf of ICANN … we sent a Freedom of Information Act request, FOIA request to the CDC.” “We said, your website says vaccines do not cause autism. Please give us the studies that show that Hep B vaccines given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Please give us the studies that show that DTaP vaccine given three times in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Same thing for IPV vaccine, for PCV vaccine, and for HIV vaccine.” “Each one of those vaccines is given three times each in the first six months of life. 15 injections.” “They never gave us the studies.” “I sued them in the Southern District of New York.” “Days before the hearing, I get a list of 20 studies, finally, from the DOJ, because they represent the CDC.” “19 of them have nothing to do with the vaccines given in the first six months of life.” “They were all either MMR studies or studies of an ingredient that wasn’t in those vaccines.” “One of them was an Institute of Medicine [study] from 2012 that canvassed all the literature on whether DTaP vaccine does or does not cause autism.” “The Institute of Medicine … said, we can only find one study on DTaP and autism.” “And in fact it showed an association between [the] DTaP vaccine and autism.” “But the IOM threw it out because they said there’s no unvaccinated control in it.” “When their back was to the wall, they had nothing.” “There are no studies.” “They could not produce one that showed the vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism.” “Here’s the thing they left out: there is one study out there regarding Hep B vaccines and autism.” “It’s from Gallagher and Goodman out of the University of Stony Brook.” “And it showed that kids that got Hep B vaccine versus those that did in the first month of life had three times the rate of autism.” Joe Rogan Aaron Siri

Children’s Health Defense

74,342 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 Today is Casey Means' confirmation hearing for Surgeon General. Senator Bill Cassidy pressed Dr. Means on what exactly she means when she talks about informed consent and shared decision making around vaccines. Watch how the exchange unfolds. Cassidy defends the status quo. He uses the Hep B vaccine as his example, explaining why newborns receive it on day one of life. He says pediatricians are already having these conversations. He says the culture is fine. Here is what Senator Cassidy apparently missed. Just months ago, ACIP held a historic meeting in which panel experts openly acknowledged for the first time that they do not have the data to justify giving every newborn a Hep B shot on the first day of life. They admitted the evidence for newborn safety is surprisingly weak. They acknowledged that infants were being asked to bear the burden for failures in adult screening and prevention. ACIP changed the recommendation. It was a stunning moment. We covered it in detail. And here is Senator Cassidy, at a Surgeon General confirmation hearing, using the Hep B newborn vaccine as his example of a vaccine that does not need more scrutiny. Dr. Means, for her part, called for gold standard placebo-controlled trials, transparent study of vaccine injury, addressing conflicts of interest in vaccine research, and transparent post-licensing data shared with the American people. Cassidy called those things pause-inducing. The American people are watching. And they are paying attention to who is asking the right questions and who is not.

The HighWire

24,133 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

Del Bigtree

30,011 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

One of the world’s most respected vaccine experts—Dr. Kathryn Edwards, co-author of the bible of vaccinology “Plotkin on Vaccines” and the scientist who personally ran many of the pivotal trials that got childhood vaccines licensed—was hired to testify under oath that vaccines do NOT cause autism. Aaron Siri asked her a simple question for each vaccine on the schedule: “Can you show me the study proving DTaP doesn’t cause autism?” → No study “Hep B?” → No study “HiB?” → No study “Prevnar?” → No study “Varicella?” → No study “Were the original licensing trials even designed to detect autism as a possible outcome?” → No Her exact words when pressed: “You’ve badgered me into answering the way you want me to, but… No.” This is the same expert the entire “vaccines are exhaustively studied for autism” narrative rests on. She had one job in that deposition—and she couldn’t do it. Not one citation. Zero studies. Del Bigtree on The HighWire called it “one of the biggest mic-drop moments in vaccine history.” And now, just weeks after ICAN forced the CDC to admit in writing (as of November 2025) they have no studies showing vaccines are safe in pregnancy or don’t cause autism, this older testimony feels more seismic than ever. Watch the unedited exchange for yourself and decide. What does real scientific confidence look like to you? Drop your thoughts—respectful discussion only.

Camus

70,800 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Rep. Kim Schrier, D-Wash., confronted Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over his decision to replace a panel of vaccine experts who make key recommendations. Schrier, a pediatrician, said she found this move “deeply concerning.” The lawmaker then asked the HHS secretary if he’s treated patients, including babies, who have measles, bacterial meningitis, whooping cough, among other illnesses, to which he said no. Schrier said thankfully, doctors have not had to treat these illnesses in recent years because of vaccines that prevent all these illnesses. Schrier then mentioned how during Kennedy’s confirmation hearings, Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, also a physician, expressed his concerns about Kennedy and his stance on vaccines. Cassidy ultimately voted to confirm Kennedy with the commitment that Kennedy would not change the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Schrier added. “But then 2 weeks ago, you fired all 17 experts on that very committee,” she added. “Did you lie to Sen. Cassidy when you told him you would not change this panel of experts?” Kennedy said he never made that agreement to Sen. Cassidy. Kennedy testified Tuesday on his agency’s budget request before a House panel, where he faced questioning about changes to U.S. vaccine policy, transparency actions, and his replacement of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Cassidy wrote on social Monday that while the ACIP replacements “have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology.” Schrier accused Kennedy of lying to Cassidy in order to secure the senator’s vote. “You lied to Sen. Cassidy. You have lied to the American people. You have lied to parents about vaccines for 20 years,” she said, “and I also want to be clear that I will lay all responsibility for every death from a vaccine-preventable illness at your feet.”

PBS News

14,470 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr