Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Senator Seriake Dickson expressed his support for tax reform bill, emphasizing the necessity of comprehensive tax reforms in Nigeria. He pointed out that the country's economy is not driven by taxation, noting that Nigeria has neglected tax systems in favor of the easy revenue generated from the oil sector.

71,680 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von OLATUNJI OLALEKAN
OLATUNJI OLALEKANvor 1 Jahr

Senator Dickson has simplified the concept and contents of the document. He was well informed being former governor rather than Senator Ndume who was arguing without substance. Knowledge is crucial and critical.

Profilbild von OluwaMayọwa,J. clement🇳🇬
OluwaMayọwa,J. clement🇳🇬vor 1 Jahr

Can't agree more with Senator Seriake Dickson.🙏💯😆

Profilbild von Ijaya
Ijayavor 1 Jahr

This is commendable

Profilbild von A.A. Ciroma
A.A. Ciromavor 1 Jahr

Excellent submissions from the former Bayelsa state governor. Deckson.

Profilbild von Kerryblack
Kerryblackvor 1 Jahr

Every state will want to be productive and not to rely on federal allocation anymore

Profilbild von MEMO
MEMOvor 1 Jahr

Senator as spoken well for the SS and Nigeria at large.

Profilbild von Divine!
Divine!vor 1 Jahr

U spoke very well @iamHSDickson . U spoke like the real and true son of the soil and represented our interest. Thank u!

Profilbild von sholly5721
sholly5721vor 1 Jahr

Senator Ndume was just arguing without substance .. this man just simplified the tax reform bill

Profilbild von bisi
bisivor 1 Jahr

All I can say this early morning is God bless our president and God bless the federal republic of Nigeria.👍

Profilbild von #FuturePresident
#FuturePresidentvor 1 Jahr

@Canbini reduction in CIt from 30-25%, exemption of the most vulnerable from PIT. cc @Tope_soft

Ähnliche Videos

Should the taxpayer still bear the burden of proof in instances where a tax dispute with the Revenue Authority is based in pre-populated & third party data? In my submission before the National Assembly's Finance & Planning Committee on behalf of the Tax Research Centre at Strathmore University, I argue that Finance Bill 2026's proposals seeking to anchor Incomes & Expenses Validation in law will be incomplete if they do not include a proposal for the the Revenue Authority being saddled with the burden of proof in such instances. Here's why: · Finance Bill 2026 proposes to amend Sec75 of the Tax Procedures Act to provide that the Revenue Authority may use technology to pre-populate tax returns on behalf of a person required to submit or lodge a tax return · Finance Bill 2026 further proposes that a person required to submit or lodge a tax return may rely on pre-populated return generated by the Revenue Authority to file their return · Finance Bill 2026 proposes to amend Sec112 to provide that the Cabinet Secretary of the National Treasury may make Regulations for the procedure for the submission or lodging of returns based on pre-populated tax returns generated by the Revenue Authority Here's where the problem is: · In all this, Sec56(1) which provides that "In any proceedings, the burden shall be on the taxpayer to prove that a tax decision is incorrect" remains unchanged · Sec56(1) is predicated on the fact that Kenya has been running on a self-assessment based regime & the data upon which tax disputes emerges was held by the taxpayer · With Incomes & Expenses Validation & the onset of a Dual Assessment regime in Kenya, taxpayers are now exposed not just to errors of judgement & data on their part, but also errors of technology & transmission which are out of their control · Can we really still have the burden of proof lying exclusively with the taxpayer in an environment where tax compliance has shifted from a function of record keeping to one where system integration reliability is now a key factor?

Julians Amboko

306,381 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten