Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
🟢 Senior Hamas official Basem Naim: “Hamas, in its political document in 2017, has clearly stated that Hamas can accept a state on ‘67 borders with Jerusalem as a capital, and guaranteeing the right of return of Palestinian refugees. Who has used this chance to build on this political... show more
101,453 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)
34 Kommentare
Palestinians never had sovereignty over Judea and Samaria. Jordan tried to annex them and get sovereignty by renaming them the West Bank of Jordan, but they lost in 1967.
Maybe he wants Israel to agree to commit suicide also in the "peace agreement"?
How does torturing and murdering Palestinians in Gaza support Hamas’s political goals? 🤔
Ghadaffi spoke to the Arab league about asking for the 67 borders after losing the war in 67.. and how that was so dumb and can’t do that after you invade and have a war in 67 kale and ask for 67 borders back and that recognizes Israel indirectly . So Christian’s Amanpour is more genocidal to Isreal and thinks people are so dumb knows she can get away with more extremist calls for the death of all the Isrealis that GHADAFfI 😂 it’s hilarious online all over and a official pan Arab meeting and he tears them up for now recognizing Isreal by asking for the 67 borders and how stupid that was when you just had a war so why would 67 borders work ? And they can sue and why did you make this fake state Palestine there was never a Palestine you have martyred so many and then do this ? So yeah I’d 67 borders are it why was there a war in 67 ? When you are trying to say
.
Christian Amanpour at her best as a sworn anti-Israel activist who promotes Hamas butchers.
Hamas's 2017 charter makes clear it will accept a Palestinian state with 1967 borders but that doesnt mean it does so while accepting Israel/Jewish state. Basically they will take their half while pledging to kill the Jews for the other half.
@ryangrim Man, I should have included Drop Site in my “needs to talk about Israel to be relevant” video.
What a stupid statement Christine. It is the zionists who have no desire for any solution involving the Palestinians. And in fact, Hamas is winning everyday in Palestine, in OPT, in Europe, in America. The action of October 7 has turned the world inside out and Hamas leads all.
They had been given Gaza in 2005. Hamas took over in 2007. No Jews left in Gaza. Nothing comparable to Northern Ireland! The British never left. All Hamas needed to do was over see the building of the Gazan economy. Build a trusting a relationship with Israel. And all would have been fine. Who knows a Palestinian State could have emerged. With an Airport, open ports. Everything if trust would have been built on Israel's total withdrawal from Gaza. Instead they stole billions, fired rockets and committed the massacres of October 7th.
These old-time journalists have always been enablers.
.
G F Y S
Every time one of the billionaire“ Hamas” leaders speak, all I hear is 👇
All members of Hamas must be eliminated, all of them.
Israel, he needs a 💣 on his head - and soon!
Why is he alive
And when they resort to armed resistance and then crawl in their tunnels under everyone in Gaza, what do you think is going to happen?
She is so ugly paid by qatar
Golda meir said it, if the 1967 border so important, why the 1967 war?
Translation: “ Palestine” from the River to the Sea.
There is no political solution. People everywhere suffer under politics and politicians. Isn’t Netanyahu a politician?
I’m sure Hamas would take it. how do they get their own state returning to a border that they lost in a war that was not started by Israel, and then expect to have modern day Israel be in Arab state through refugee return. That’s not a two state solution.
1. Why weren’t they happy with 67 in 67? 2. During the current conflict Hamas offered 67 boarders for a 5 year ceasefire not permanent peace. 3. If you thought Israelis were genocidal you wouldn’t think the right of return was such a good thing. Face it. You know Israel is not.
All members of Hamas should be killed
We never want to live next to you again - you can go to any arab place and make your state - vast amounts of arab lands - go be with ISLAM - the jews want nothing to do with you. ZERO.
Pathetic
Then why are Israelis killed if they enter "Palestine"? They are Islam and another piece of land will never give peace.
Yes, we know you’re a lying Hamas-endorsed propaganda site.
Using that logic, Israel has the right to respond by any means.
🐍👹🤮
This corrupt terrorist state always looks for a "political solution" that never comes. In the meantime, they are begging for donations all over the world to support their tunnel building, the purchase of weapons, and terrorist indoctrination and training. These population head honchos are not interested in building a peaceful, coexisting nation, supplying jobs for young people, or creating a modern society. All they are interested in is scheming donations into their offshore Dubai accounts, robbing the UN humanitarian deliveries, propaganda of a culture of killing, and other assorted terrorist activities to continue to claim victimhood status to get more donations. When #Israel hits back, they cry Uncle, make Gazawood videos with "fresh" bodies, falsify the number of victims (do not get me started on HAMAS Ministry of Health), blame Israel for all their ills, and run back to their donors begging for more donations. It's a vicious circle that has been turning for decades with no stoppage in sight.
If only peace talks came with a RSVP button, maybe they'd finally show up.
Drop site the gaslighting "news site"
![⚡️BREAKING - Khalil Al-Hayya, the head of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, gave a speech today, March 29th, 2025 confirming: Hamas approved the new Egyptian-Qatari proposal for ceasefire and is awaiting an "israeli" response. He also confirmed that Hamas presented to Egypt a list of the (10-15) people who are going to make up the new technocratic unity government (Community Support Committee) to administer all affairs of the Gaza Strip following meetings with all Palestinian factions. “We dealt with [this proposal from Egypt and Qatar] positively and agreed to it. We hope that the occupation will not obstruct it or thwart the mediators' efforts. No expulsion. No displacement. As for the weapon of resistance, it is a red line and it is linked to the existence of the occupation and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state. And we say frankly to those who bet that Hamas and the resistance factions might abandon their responsibilities and hand over our people and families to an unknown fate controlled by the occupation according to its desires; We tell them you are delusional. [Our goal is] joint action with the components of our Palestinian people to gain our right to establish a fully sovereign Palestinian state with Al-Quds as its capital, and the right of return for refugees.” Credit for subtitles: RNN Telegram.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1906094407088263432/amplify_video_thumb/1906092807510511616/img/gQxyn0bUOIJth8Pv.jpg)
![🟩The latest Pod Save America episode features the hosts forcefully condemning Israel’s starvation siege and assault on Gaza, describing the mass killing and widespread hunger with clarity. Yet even as the conversation on the conflict evolves, political analysts continue to portray Hamas as a singular evil—a “monster”—without addressing the political and material conditions shaping the movement’s stance, most critically the question of why it refuses to disarm. Senior Palestinian resistance leaders have consistently told Drop Site News that disarmament under occupation would amount to total abandonment of the Palestinian struggle for self-determination. It would clear the path for full-scale ethnic cleansing. That’s why, after rejecting the Witkoff proposal in April, a senior Hamas official told the BBC that disarmament remains “a million red lines”: “The Israeli proposal … called for the disarmament of Hamas without any Israeli commitment to end the war or withdraw from Gaza. Hamas therefore rejected the offer in its entirety.” Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan expanded on this in a May interview with Jeremy Scahill: “We are a people under occupation. We are not fighting because we like to fight. Even if a Muslim came to occupy my land, I would fight him. It’s not about religion—it’s about occupation.” Despite reports in Israeli and some Arab media that Hamas might consider storing its weapons or handing them to a third party, Hamdan told Drop Site there have been no formal talks about such a proposal. “What about the Israeli weapons? Are they going to store their weapons, too?” said Hamdan. He stated that disarmament only follows a genuine political agreement between two parties: “Such an experience happened in Northern Ireland,” he noted. “But there was a real political arrangement, which was accepted by both sides.” Unless that happens, Hamdan said, the resistance will retain its arms until Palestinians achieve full statehood: “If there was a Palestinian state, those weapons would be handed to the Palestinian government. Even the [resistance] fighters, they will turn to be part of the army or the police of this government.” Until that day, Palestinians retain a legal right to resist illegal colonial occupation—a right codified in international law and affirmed in the UN Charter and General Assembly resolutions, which recognize the legitimacy of peoples fighting for self-determination “by all available means, including armed struggle.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1950325294188949621/amplify_video_thumb/1950325213939302400/img/qn9joD3hTjIW3Nby.jpg)
![Judith Butler describing the October 7 massacre as armed resistance: “We can have different views about Hamas as a political party, we can have different views about armed resistance. But [...] the uprising of October 7th was an act of armed resistance.[...] This was an uprising”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1764784098822750420/ext_tw_video_thumb/1764783650074226688/pu/img/1CKYPTu0TejUqXie.jpg)
