Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sharing some exciting DYNA-1 result: zero-shot environment generalization We put DYNA-1 under test in a completely different environment from our training distribution – with an entirely different background (Dyna Robotics banner) and metal table. The table has a reflective and smooth surface, creating a wildly different visual appearance as...

49,008 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jason Ma
Jason Mavor 1 Jahr

Original thread:

Profilbild von MrRobotics
MrRoboticsvor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics why is it 10X and doesn't look impressive as the first demo?

Profilbild von Hiro Protagonist
Hiro Protagonistvor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics 10x speed so it's still basically useless for real life applications. Robotics amateur hour.

Profilbild von pfung
pfungvor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics nice robustness!

Profilbild von Ming Qin
Ming Qinvor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics The table can even reflect the robot itself, and it doesn’t seem surprised at all

Profilbild von atharva
atharvavor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics insane

Profilbild von Max von Wolff
Max von Wolffvor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics Impressive!

Profilbild von Humanoid Pulse
Humanoid Pulsevor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics wow- there is something sacinating in that - can watch for hours🤓

Profilbild von Peter Christie
Peter Christievor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics Nope….

Profilbild von Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Accvor 1 Jahr

@DynaRobotics Impressive stuff!

Ähnliche Videos

JUST IN: Dyna Robotics just published one of the most important research papers in robotics this year. It could fundamentally change how robot foundation models are trained. A scaling law that transfers from human video to robot performance. Dyna-2 is out and it's 🔥 Here's what that means in plain terms. Dyna-2 was pre-trained on ONE MILLION hours of egocentric human video, 170 years of continuous human experience, cooking, folding, assembling, cleaning. And as that human data scaled, robot performance improved. Predictably. Monotonically. Across 39 tasks on two different robot embodiments the model had never seen. → 1,000 hours pre-training → 20% normalised task performance → 10,000 hours → 28% → 100,000 hours → 45% → 1,000,000 hours → 53% Human video exists at effectively unlimited scale. Every cook, every factory worker, every craftsperson wearing a camera is generating training data for future robots. But the finding that stunned even the researchers, world modeling is what makes the transfer work. A model trained to predict future video AND actions massively outperforms one trained on actions alone. Video is the new scaling axis for robotics. One more jaw-dropping data point. 13 minutes of teleoperation data was enough to fine-tune Dyna-2 to open a bottle cap using two five-fingered robot hands. The robots are coming, and they're learning from us directly :D Read more here: Congrats Jason Ma and team! ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

23,576 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Robots don’t learn the physical world from clean datasets. They learn from messy decisions, different movements, and thousands of possible ways a task can go wrong. That’s why I think the data problem in Physical AI is much bigger than simply collecting more examples. A robot can look impressive in a controlled demonstration and still struggle when the environment changes. A different angle. A different object. A slightly different position. A movement that doesn’t go exactly as expected. Humans handle these variations naturally because we have years of physical experience to draw from. Robots don’t. They need enormous amounts of training experience to learn how to perceive situations, choose actions, recover from mistakes, and repeat successful behavior. This is where Axis Robotics is taking an interesting approach. Instead of treating simulation as just a place to test robots, Axis is turning it into a data-generation environment for physical intelligence. More than 200K people are now contributing demonstrations in simulation, creating examples of how tasks can be performed. But the important part isn’t simply the number of contributors. It’s what happens to those demonstrations afterward. The interactions are recorded, validated, and written to Base, creating a verifiable trail around the data being generated. That gives the whole process a different structure: Humans demonstrate → simulations capture → data gets validated → training signals accumulate → robots get more experience. And that feedback loop is what interests me. Because scaling Physical AI may not come from finding one perfect algorithm. It may come from building a system capable of producing millions of useful experiences that algorithms can actually learn from. The robot is only as good as the experience available to train it. And if Axis can keep scaling the quality and volume of that experience, it could become one of the important infrastructure layers behind the next generation of capable robots. The race in Physical AI isn’t only about building smarter models. It’s about giving those models enough real-world experience to become smart in the first place. Axis Robotics.

ABBA

90,854 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen