Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

She rebuilt Claude with a second brain, structured 3 folders, connected it to n8n, and runs her business for $200/month instead of $15,000. Most people just drop links into Claude and wonder why it keeps giving generic answers. the problem was never the prompts, it was about the context...

13,546 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

A girl who openly calls herself kind of stupid made $20,000 last month, and her face never appeared on screen once. She wasn't selling talent. She was running a loop with Claude that anyone reading this could start tonight. Here is the entire method. There is nothing else to it. She opened YouTube and searched baby shows. She found one with millions of views. A dancing fruit sensory video, a counting whales cartoon, the kind of thing that plays on a loop in the background of every toddler's life. She opened it, went to the transcript, and copied the whole thing. She pasted that transcript into Claude and asked it to turn the format into a prompt for a similar video. Claude wrote the prompt. She pasted the prompt into an AI video generator. A few minutes later she had a finished cartoon. Bright colors, dancing animals, big letters, cheerful music. Indistinguishable from the one she copied. She posted it. Then she did the exact same thing the next day. And the day after. And every single day for 30 days. She never wrote a script, animated a frame or recorded a single sound. She found something that already worked, fed it to Claude, let an AI rebuild it, and uploaded the result before she went to bed. Nobody knew who she was. No name, no face, no personality, no story. Just a channel quietly posting toddler cartoons every day. And YouTube paid her anyway, because YouTube does not pay you for being interesting. It pays you for watch time, and toddlers watch the same video until the battery dies. By the end of the month the payments were real. $20,000 to a girl who will tell you to your face that she is not smart. That is the part nobody wants to sit with. The barrier was never intelligence. It was never talent. The only thing standing between her and the money was whether she would run a boring 5 minute loop every day for 30 days without quitting. She did. Most people won't. The system didn't filter for smart. It filtered for showing up.

Marlow

28,708 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I just built a self-improving second brain in Claude Code 🤯 A brain that runs your brand: every tool reads from it, it's wired to your live data, and it gets smarter every week. All running on the Claude Agent SDK. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies whose AI output sounds generic because every new chat starts from zero. If you're re-explaining your brand to AI every single time — re-pasting the voice guidelines, re-describing the customer you've described a hundred times, re-uploading the same positioning doc you uploaded yesterday, and still editing for an hour to strip out the generic phrasing... A brand second brain fixes the entire loop: → Build 3 foundation files once: brand DNA, voice, and customer → Every skill you create reads from them automatically → Wire in live data — your ad account, competitor ads, customer reviews → A weekly routine refreshes the brain with what's actually working → Every output comes back on-brand on the first pass No re-briefing AI on every chat. No hour of editing to undo generic phrasing. No brain that goes stale the week after you build it. What a second brain gives you: → The exact 3-file foundation that runs the whole system → The skill structure that makes every tool brand-aware by default → The live-data wiring that keeps it grounded in reality → The weekly self-improvement loop that keeps it sharp → The cold-start sequence to stand it all up from zero Built 100% in Claude Code. I put together the full playbook with the file structure, the wiring, and the exact setup. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "BRAIN" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

18,118 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

While brain dead, singer and songwriter Pam Reynolds experienced one of the world’s most famous unexplained near-death experiences. Her story challenges a lot of our conventional beliefs about the brain, says pediatric neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Egnor. In 1991, Pam suffered a life-threatening aneurism at the base of her brain. In order to repair the aneurism, she underwent what is called “standstill”: deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Her body was cooled down to 60 degrees Fahrenheit, her heartbeat and breathing stopped and all blood was drained from her head. This meant that Pam met the standard criteria for clinical death during the operation. Yet she saw the entire surgery. She describes how she popped out of her body and witnessed the surgery taking place. She recounted details of the operation she could not have known about. She described conversations between doctors and even the music they were playing in the operating room while she was brain dead. While she was watching the operation, she “saw a tunnel, and she felt herself being pulled down the tunnel. So it was this very pleasant feeling…She saw this beautiful world, and she saw, I think it was her grandparents who had passed away, and her grandparents told her that it wasn't her time yet, and that she had children to raise, and she had to go back. So she went back down the tunnel, and she went back into her body when her heart restarted, and she said it was like diving into ice water. She says it was extremely unpleasant, which, yeah, it was 60 degrees. It was very cold,” Dr. Egnor says. Pam’s experience is the best documented death experience in medical history, says Dr. Egnor. And neuroscientists are at a loss how to explain it. Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture

Jan Jekielek

308,915 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten