Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

She rebuilt Claude with a second brain, structured 3 folders, connected it to n8n, and runs her business for $200/month instead of $15,000. Most people just drop links into Claude and wonder why it keeps giving generic answers. the problem was never the prompts, it was about the context... all the time. so a girl built 3 folders and gave them to Claude: - wiki: frameworks from the smartest people alive - business: what she's building, who it's for, how she makes money - self: her voice, her principles, what she says no to Together, they form a brain that actually thinks, without any slop, and you get only sharp and specific output. then she connected that brain to n8n and let it run: - support tickets ✓ - invoices ✓ - weekly reports ✓ - lead qualification ✓ As a result, she managed to make her whole business fully autonomous for $200. Full breakdown with every workflow and prompt is in the article below 👇show more

Spivach

1,454 subscribers

13,546 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THIS GUY BUILT A GOD-MODE SECOND BRAIN IN 3 STEPS THAT GETS SMARTER EVERY SINGLE DAY AND 10X HIS RESEARCH! Everyone hoards notes they never reopen, but he turned the dead pile into a brain that actually reads itself back, in three steps: > download Obsidian, make a vault, and point Claude Code at the folder > create two folders inside, raw-sources for everything you dump in and wiki where Claude writes the organized version, then drop in Andrej Karpathy's prompt > throw in every article, book note, meeting transcript and piece of research you ever saved and forgot Then you stop searching and start asking the wiki, "what are the gaps in my knowledge", "write me a briefing on this topic", and Claude pulls from your whole vault and answers with citations. Everyone copies the folders, but the part that actually matters is what happens next, every answer gets written back into the wiki and a weekly health check hunts for contradictions and outdated info, so it is not storage you query, it is a brain that compounds every day you use it. The full step by step guide with the Karpathy prompt and the .md files is in the article below.👇 P.S. you can send this article straight to your Claude to get the full context

THIS GUY BUILT A GOD-MODE SECOND BRAIN IN 3 STEPS THAT GETS SMARTER EVERY SINGLE DAY AND 10X HIS RESEARCH! Everyone hoards notes they never reopen, but he turned the dead pile into a brain that actually reads itself back, in three steps: > download Obsidian, make a vault, and point Claude Code at the folder > create two folders inside, raw-sources for everything you dump in and wiki where Claude writes the organized version, then drop in Andrej Karpathy's prompt > throw in every article, book note, meeting transcript and piece of research you ever saved and forgot Then you stop searching and start asking the wiki, "what are the gaps in my knowledge", "write me a briefing on this topic", and Claude pulls from your whole vault and answers with citations. Everyone copies the folders, but the part that actually matters is what happens next, every answer gets written back into the wiki and a weekly health check hunts for contradictions and outdated info, so it is not storage you query, it is a brain that compounds every day you use it. The full step by step guide with the Karpathy prompt and the .md files is in the article below.👇 P.S. you can send this article straight to your Claude to get the full context

Miraqle

15,128 views • 1 month ago

A 33-year-old Sarah from Brooklyn sold a website to a restaurant for $8,000, and it took her 7 hours She used a new tool, Claude Design, for which she spent $20/month She posted her ads on free freelance websites, and Claude created a business card for her 2 days later, a restaurant that opened a week ago writes to her: they need a website She names a price of $8,000, and they agree if they like everything She described the idea, and Claude came up with everything, with the ability to edit every detail. 7 hours later, the website was ready She sent it to the client, and they were thrilled: the deal was made The full instructions are already in the article

A 33-year-old Sarah from Brooklyn sold a website to a restaurant for $8,000, and it took her 7 hours She used a new tool, Claude Design, for which she spent $20/month She posted her ads on free freelance websites, and Claude created a business card for her 2 days later, a restaurant that opened a week ago writes to her: they need a website She names a price of $8,000, and they agree if they like everything She described the idea, and Claude came up with everything, with the ability to edit every detail. 7 hours later, the website was ready She sent it to the client, and they were thrilled: the deal was made The full instructions are already in the article

Bober_smart

28,973 views • 1 month ago

Most people use Claude Code like a chatbot, then wonder why it forgets everything by Tuesday. The ones quietly building $10K AI workflows give it a second brain instead, and it’s free. It’s called Obsidian. You download it, point it at one folder on your computer, and that folder becomes a vault. Every note inside it is now something Claude Code can read end to end. Open Claude in that folder and it’s connected, that simple. The trick isn’t the tool, it’s the map. 3 folders, that’s the whole system. Raw, you dump everything here. Notes, transcripts, screenshots, half thoughts, zero structure. Wiki, Claude reads the raw pile and writes clean Wikipedia style articles about it, structured, searchable, permanent. Output, when you want a deliverable, a PDF, a slide deck, a script, it pulls from the wiki and ships it. Most people skip the wiki layer and feed Claude a junk drawer of 400 files, then blame the model when the answers are garbage. The model isn’t the problem, your folder is. Give it a path it can follow and it finds anything in 1 second, give it chaos and it guesses. You don’t even have to design the structure yourself. Open the vault, tell Claude to build a file system that fits your work, and watch it organize your entire brain in one prompt. Free tool, 3 folders, a second brain that compounds while you sleep. The people falling behind are still copy pasting into a chat window.

Most people use Claude Code like a chatbot, then wonder why it forgets everything by Tuesday. The ones quietly building $10K AI workflows give it a second brain instead, and it’s free. It’s called Obsidian. You download it, point it at one folder on your computer, and that folder becomes a vault. Every note inside it is now something Claude Code can read end to end. Open Claude in that folder and it’s connected, that simple. The trick isn’t the tool, it’s the map. 3 folders, that’s the whole system. Raw, you dump everything here. Notes, transcripts, screenshots, half thoughts, zero structure. Wiki, Claude reads the raw pile and writes clean Wikipedia style articles about it, structured, searchable, permanent. Output, when you want a deliverable, a PDF, a slide deck, a script, it pulls from the wiki and ships it. Most people skip the wiki layer and feed Claude a junk drawer of 400 files, then blame the model when the answers are garbage. The model isn’t the problem, your folder is. Give it a path it can follow and it finds anything in 1 second, give it chaos and it guesses. You don’t even have to design the structure yourself. Open the vault, tell Claude to build a file system that fits your work, and watch it organize your entire brain in one prompt. Free tool, 3 folders, a second brain that compounds while you sleep. The people falling behind are still copy pasting into a chat window.

West Lord

32,845 views • 1 month ago

50-year-old woman from Shanghai decided to just make a joke but in the end she earned $3958 in 4 hours With the help of Claude, she created a Chinese girl and launched her first stream Claude changed her appearance, background, voice and even language in real time She launched the stream simultaneously on 3 platforms: YouTube, TikTok and Twitch Men liked the girl so much that she started receiving donations after just 15 minutes > In 4 hours she was donated $3958 > The biggest donation was $550 The article contains 10 folders with tools for creation and workflow automation

50-year-old woman from Shanghai decided to just make a joke but in the end she earned $3958 in 4 hours With the help of Claude, she created a Chinese girl and launched her first stream Claude changed her appearance, background, voice and even language in real time She launched the stream simultaneously on 3 platforms: YouTube, TikTok and Twitch Men liked the girl so much that she started receiving donations after just 15 minutes > In 4 hours she was donated $3958 > The biggest donation was $550 The article contains 10 folders with tools for creation and workflow automation

Bober_smart

91,681 views • 2 months ago

A girl who openly calls herself kind of stupid made $20,000 last month, and her face never appeared on screen once. She wasn't selling talent. She was running a loop with Claude that anyone reading this could start tonight. Here is the entire method. There is nothing else to it. She opened YouTube and searched baby shows. She found one with millions of views. A dancing fruit sensory video, a counting whales cartoon, the kind of thing that plays on a loop in the background of every toddler's life. She opened it, went to the transcript, and copied the whole thing. She pasted that transcript into Claude and asked it to turn the format into a prompt for a similar video. Claude wrote the prompt. She pasted the prompt into an AI video generator. A few minutes later she had a finished cartoon. Bright colors, dancing animals, big letters, cheerful music. Indistinguishable from the one she copied. She posted it. Then she did the exact same thing the next day. And the day after. And every single day for 30 days. She never wrote a script, animated a frame or recorded a single sound. She found something that already worked, fed it to Claude, let an AI rebuild it, and uploaded the result before she went to bed. Nobody knew who she was. No name, no face, no personality, no story. Just a channel quietly posting toddler cartoons every day. And YouTube paid her anyway, because YouTube does not pay you for being interesting. It pays you for watch time, and toddlers watch the same video until the battery dies. By the end of the month the payments were real. $20,000 to a girl who will tell you to your face that she is not smart. That is the part nobody wants to sit with. The barrier was never intelligence. It was never talent. The only thing standing between her and the money was whether she would run a boring 5 minute loop every day for 30 days without quitting. She did. Most people won't. The system didn't filter for smart. It filtered for showing up.

A girl who openly calls herself kind of stupid made $20,000 last month, and her face never appeared on screen once. She wasn't selling talent. She was running a loop with Claude that anyone reading this could start tonight. Here is the entire method. There is nothing else to it. She opened YouTube and searched baby shows. She found one with millions of views. A dancing fruit sensory video, a counting whales cartoon, the kind of thing that plays on a loop in the background of every toddler's life. She opened it, went to the transcript, and copied the whole thing. She pasted that transcript into Claude and asked it to turn the format into a prompt for a similar video. Claude wrote the prompt. She pasted the prompt into an AI video generator. A few minutes later she had a finished cartoon. Bright colors, dancing animals, big letters, cheerful music. Indistinguishable from the one she copied. She posted it. Then she did the exact same thing the next day. And the day after. And every single day for 30 days. She never wrote a script, animated a frame or recorded a single sound. She found something that already worked, fed it to Claude, let an AI rebuild it, and uploaded the result before she went to bed. Nobody knew who she was. No name, no face, no personality, no story. Just a channel quietly posting toddler cartoons every day. And YouTube paid her anyway, because YouTube does not pay you for being interesting. It pays you for watch time, and toddlers watch the same video until the battery dies. By the end of the month the payments were real. $20,000 to a girl who will tell you to your face that she is not smart. That is the part nobody wants to sit with. The barrier was never intelligence. It was never talent. The only thing standing between her and the money was whether she would run a boring 5 minute loop every day for 30 days without quitting. She did. Most people won't. The system didn't filter for smart. It filtered for showing up.

Marlow

28,708 views • 2 months ago

Claude in your pocket in 1 minute | make $10,000+ anywhere 24-year-old girl from Nevada works as a consultant in a women's store and decided to create her dropshipping business using Claude , result she made $12,457 in a month She worked 12 hours a day she had no time to sit at a laptop at home and she was afraid to quit , what if nothing comes out She found a script and her life changed , she managed Claude from her phone during coffee breaks and food breaks > /remote-control > You get a URL and a QR code > Scan > Done You completely control everything from your phone The article contains tools for creating and automating workflows

Claude in your pocket in 1 minute | make $10,000+ anywhere 24-year-old girl from Nevada works as a consultant in a women's store and decided to create her dropshipping business using Claude , result she made $12,457 in a month She worked 12 hours a day she had no time to sit at a laptop at home and she was afraid to quit , what if nothing comes out She found a script and her life changed , she managed Claude from her phone during coffee breaks and food breaks > /remote-control > You get a URL and a QR code > Scan > Done You completely control everything from your phone The article contains tools for creating and automating workflows

Bober_smart

11,850 views • 2 months ago

Kendra Lust revealed a story about her nosy neighbour who had asked her for what she does for a living even though she already knew what she does and she had replied confidently that she does Advlt film cause it affords a very good life for her family and that she has a business on the side and she had asked "what about you" she revealed that the neighbors Jaw dropped. In her opinion when you own it and sat it what can people say, she says she is going to say it because she is not ashamed of it. She revealed that the same night the neighbour had divulged a lot of information about her life and her previous marriage. "Sometimes when you become vulnerable or you make yourself vulnerable, people are more inclined to talk with you"

Sensitive content

Kendra Lust revealed a story about her nosy neighbour who had asked her for what she does for a living even though she already knew what she does and she had replied confidently that she does Advlt film cause it affords a very good life for her family and that she has a business on the side and she had asked "what about you" she revealed that the neighbors Jaw dropped. In her opinion when you own it and sat it what can people say, she says she is going to say it because she is not ashamed of it. She revealed that the same night the neighbour had divulged a lot of information about her life and her previous marriage. "Sometimes when you become vulnerable or you make yourself vulnerable, people are more inclined to talk with you"

𝙔𝙖gi

41,551 views • 3 days ago

This woman felt like she was missing out on her childhood, she decided that she would open a lemonade stand like what the kids did. She would make it fresh and from scratch, so she went to the store and bought it, she setup a table and served her lemonade, and didn’t even charge money for it. Most kids who do it made it themselves and sold it for money, she seemed to be missing allot in her business model, what do you think she did wrong?

This woman felt like she was missing out on her childhood, she decided that she would open a lemonade stand like what the kids did. She would make it fresh and from scratch, so she went to the store and bought it, she setup a table and served her lemonade, and didn’t even charge money for it. Most kids who do it made it themselves and sold it for money, she seemed to be missing allot in her business model, what do you think she did wrong?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

185,239 views • 4 months ago

She said she was kind of stupid, but she made $20,000 and her face was never on screen. She opened YouTube and found a kids' show with millions of views. Went to the description. Found the transcript. Copied it into Claude. Asked it to make a prompt for a similar video. Pasted that prompt into an AI generator. A few minutes later she had a video. She posted it. Then did the same thing the next day. And every day after for 30 days. Nobody knew who she was. YouTube paid her anyway. By the end of the month, YouTube was paying her. The system didn't require talent. It just required repetition.

She said she was kind of stupid, but she made $20,000 and her face was never on screen. She opened YouTube and found a kids' show with millions of views. Went to the description. Found the transcript. Copied it into Claude. Asked it to make a prompt for a similar video. Pasted that prompt into an AI generator. A few minutes later she had a video. She posted it. Then did the same thing the next day. And every day after for 30 days. Nobody knew who she was. YouTube paid her anyway. By the end of the month, YouTube was paying her. The system didn't require talent. It just required repetition.

Superior

353,232 views • 2 months ago

I just built a self-improving second brain in Claude Code 🤯 A brain that runs your brand: every tool reads from it, it's wired to your live data, and it gets smarter every week. All running on the Claude Agent SDK. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies whose AI output sounds generic because every new chat starts from zero. If you're re-explaining your brand to AI every single time — re-pasting the voice guidelines, re-describing the customer you've described a hundred times, re-uploading the same positioning doc you uploaded yesterday, and still editing for an hour to strip out the generic phrasing... A brand second brain fixes the entire loop: → Build 3 foundation files once: brand DNA, voice, and customer → Every skill you create reads from them automatically → Wire in live data — your ad account, competitor ads, customer reviews → A weekly routine refreshes the brain with what's actually working → Every output comes back on-brand on the first pass No re-briefing AI on every chat. No hour of editing to undo generic phrasing. No brain that goes stale the week after you build it. What a second brain gives you: → The exact 3-file foundation that runs the whole system → The skill structure that makes every tool brand-aware by default → The live-data wiring that keeps it grounded in reality → The weekly self-improvement loop that keeps it sharp → The cold-start sequence to stand it all up from zero Built 100% in Claude Code. I put together the full playbook with the file structure, the wiring, and the exact setup. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "BRAIN" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

17,880 views • 1 month ago

I genuinely don't understand why everyone isn't using this yet. Andrej Karpathy, OpenAI co-founder, posted a simple idea that went massively viral: Stop using AI to write code. Use it to build a second brain. You point Claude Code at a folder. Drop in any source: an article, a transcript, a PDF. Claude reads it, links it, files it into a living wiki of everything you know. It compounds like interest. The more you feed it, the smarter it gets. Here's the whole thing: 1) Install Obsidian 2) Create a vault 3) Open it in Claude Code 4) Paste Karpathy's wiki idea and tell Claude to build it 5) Claude makes three folders: - raw (for sources) - wiki (for its pages) - CLAUDE. md (that runs it) 6) Drop any source into raw and say: "ingest this" 7) Ask questions across everything, forever Five minutes to set up and you never start from a blank chat again. Full step by step guide below.

I genuinely don't understand why everyone isn't using this yet. Andrej Karpathy, OpenAI co-founder, posted a simple idea that went massively viral: Stop using AI to write code. Use it to build a second brain. You point Claude Code at a folder. Drop in any source: an article, a transcript, a PDF. Claude reads it, links it, files it into a living wiki of everything you know. It compounds like interest. The more you feed it, the smarter it gets. Here's the whole thing: 1) Install Obsidian 2) Create a vault 3) Open it in Claude Code 4) Paste Karpathy's wiki idea and tell Claude to build it 5) Claude makes three folders: - raw (for sources) - wiki (for its pages) - CLAUDE. md (that runs it) 6) Drop any source into raw and say: "ingest this" 7) Ask questions across everything, forever Five minutes to set up and you never start from a blank chat again. Full step by step guide below.

CyrilXBT

322,338 views • 1 month ago

While brain dead, singer and songwriter Pam Reynolds experienced one of the world’s most famous unexplained near-death experiences. Her story challenges a lot of our conventional beliefs about the brain, says pediatric neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Egnor. In 1991, Pam suffered a life-threatening aneurism at the base of her brain. In order to repair the aneurism, she underwent what is called “standstill”: deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Her body was cooled down to 60 degrees Fahrenheit, her heartbeat and breathing stopped and all blood was drained from her head. This meant that Pam met the standard criteria for clinical death during the operation. Yet she saw the entire surgery. She describes how she popped out of her body and witnessed the surgery taking place. She recounted details of the operation she could not have known about. She described conversations between doctors and even the music they were playing in the operating room while she was brain dead. While she was watching the operation, she “saw a tunnel, and she felt herself being pulled down the tunnel. So it was this very pleasant feeling…She saw this beautiful world, and she saw, I think it was her grandparents who had passed away, and her grandparents told her that it wasn't her time yet, and that she had children to raise, and she had to go back. So she went back down the tunnel, and she went back into her body when her heart restarted, and she said it was like diving into ice water. She says it was extremely unpleasant, which, yeah, it was 60 degrees. It was very cold,” Dr. Egnor says. Pam’s experience is the best documented death experience in medical history, says Dr. Egnor. And neuroscientists are at a loss how to explain it. Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture

While brain dead, singer and songwriter Pam Reynolds experienced one of the world’s most famous unexplained near-death experiences. Her story challenges a lot of our conventional beliefs about the brain, says pediatric neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Egnor. In 1991, Pam suffered a life-threatening aneurism at the base of her brain. In order to repair the aneurism, she underwent what is called “standstill”: deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Her body was cooled down to 60 degrees Fahrenheit, her heartbeat and breathing stopped and all blood was drained from her head. This meant that Pam met the standard criteria for clinical death during the operation. Yet she saw the entire surgery. She describes how she popped out of her body and witnessed the surgery taking place. She recounted details of the operation she could not have known about. She described conversations between doctors and even the music they were playing in the operating room while she was brain dead. While she was watching the operation, she “saw a tunnel, and she felt herself being pulled down the tunnel. So it was this very pleasant feeling…She saw this beautiful world, and she saw, I think it was her grandparents who had passed away, and her grandparents told her that it wasn't her time yet, and that she had children to raise, and she had to go back. So she went back down the tunnel, and she went back into her body when her heart restarted, and she said it was like diving into ice water. She says it was extremely unpleasant, which, yeah, it was 60 degrees. It was very cold,” Dr. Egnor says. Pam’s experience is the best documented death experience in medical history, says Dr. Egnor. And neuroscientists are at a loss how to explain it. Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture

Jan Jekielek

308,915 views • 8 months ago

A 48-year-old girl from Britain decided to just make a joke, but in the end, she earned $2,245 in 4 hours With the help of Claude, she created a Chinese girl and started a stream Claude changed the appearance, background, voice, and even language in real time She started the stream on 3 platforms at once: YouTube, TikTok, and Kick Men liked the girl so much that they started donating > In 4 hours, she was donated $2,245 > The biggest donation was $400 The article contains 10 folders with tools for creation and workflow automation

A 48-year-old girl from Britain decided to just make a joke, but in the end, she earned $2,245 in 4 hours With the help of Claude, she created a Chinese girl and started a stream Claude changed the appearance, background, voice, and even language in real time She started the stream on 3 platforms at once: YouTube, TikTok, and Kick Men liked the girl so much that they started donating > In 4 hours, she was donated $2,245 > The biggest donation was $400 The article contains 10 folders with tools for creation and workflow automation

Bober_smart

1,907,418 views • 2 months ago

This lady runs a cake pop business and gets both online and in-person orders. Not long ago someone claiming to represent a nonprofit asked her to donate 200 cake pops for an event 60 days away. She asked for proof to verify that it was legit - a flyer, tax info, anything. She followed up 30 days out, then again right before the event. No response, even though her messages were read. She had a paying order for the same day, so she told them one last time: no proof means she’s taking the paid gig. A few days before the event the rep finally messaged asking when they could pick up the free cake pops. She said no, because they never provided what she asked for. The rep got angry and started trashing her business online. Who was right here? Is it the lady who has the business and is protecting her time and money, or the nonprofit that wouldn’t give basic proof? 🤔

This lady runs a cake pop business and gets both online and in-person orders. Not long ago someone claiming to represent a nonprofit asked her to donate 200 cake pops for an event 60 days away. She asked for proof to verify that it was legit - a flyer, tax info, anything. She followed up 30 days out, then again right before the event. No response, even though her messages were read. She had a paying order for the same day, so she told them one last time: no proof means she’s taking the paid gig. A few days before the event the rep finally messaged asking when they could pick up the free cake pops. She said no, because they never provided what she asked for. The rep got angry and started trashing her business online. Who was right here? Is it the lady who has the business and is protecting her time and money, or the nonprofit that wouldn’t give basic proof? 🤔

Croxxed Out

869,588 views • 3 months ago

i keep telling people to build this and they nod politely and never do it... andrej karpathy posted how to fix this a while ago, and everyone just keeps working the old way the dumb thing is this... you pay to teach claude the same lessons over and over, every chat is a fresh amnesia patient, every contradiction it catches evaporates the second you close the tab, and you accept this like it's just how ai works 1. one folder is a graveyard for originals that nobody edits, another folder is claude's active memory that only claude writes to, a third folder is a two-page rulebook that keeps claude from confusing them 2. a raw file gets read the day it arrives and then it's done, claude never touches it again, everything it needed is already extracted into wiki pages with the source cited right there 3. every time claude notices your new answer clashes with your old one, it doesn't pick a side, it writes both with dates, and from then on it treats you like someone who might be wrong the raw folder is a museum... the wiki is the actual working brain full breakdown is in the article below

i keep telling people to build this and they nod politely and never do it... andrej karpathy posted how to fix this a while ago, and everyone just keeps working the old way the dumb thing is this... you pay to teach claude the same lessons over and over, every chat is a fresh amnesia patient, every contradiction it catches evaporates the second you close the tab, and you accept this like it's just how ai works 1. one folder is a graveyard for originals that nobody edits, another folder is claude's active memory that only claude writes to, a third folder is a two-page rulebook that keeps claude from confusing them 2. a raw file gets read the day it arrives and then it's done, claude never touches it again, everything it needed is already extracted into wiki pages with the source cited right there 3. every time claude notices your new answer clashes with your old one, it doesn't pick a side, it writes both with dates, and from then on it treats you like someone who might be wrong the raw folder is a museum... the wiki is the actual working brain full breakdown is in the article below

kai

31,409 views • 9 days ago

giselle explained that ‘tornado’ actually wasn’t made with her concert solo stage in mind. it was just a song she and shintaro yasuda made in a bootcamp, and only the two of them worked on it. previously, giselle mentioned that she was the one who went to the concert a&r unnie and told her that she had a song, which is tornado, and that she wanted to use it for her solo stage. the staff unnie approved it after giving the song a listen, and giselle happily brought that to her manager after, who also gave the approval. (sm often holds songwriting and production bootcamps in seoul from time to time. it’s usually how idols connect with producers and songwriters.)

giselle explained that ‘tornado’ actually wasn’t made with her concert solo stage in mind. it was just a song she and shintaro yasuda made in a bootcamp, and only the two of them worked on it. previously, giselle mentioned that she was the one who went to the concert a&r unnie and told her that she had a song, which is tornado, and that she wanted to use it for her solo stage. the staff unnie approved it after giving the song a listen, and giselle happily brought that to her manager after, who also gave the approval. (sm often holds songwriting and production bootcamps in seoul from time to time. it’s usually how idols connect with producers and songwriters.)

13 ✿

181,574 views • 8 months ago

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

Maurora🫦

10,530 views • 4 months ago

Her app made over $1M. And it all started with a simple personal problem. She looked for the app. It didn't exist. So she built it. I sat down with Ania Wysocka for a couple hours, and here’s the top 5% of our chat: > The problem she solved (2:07) > How she built the MVP with no coding experience (3:26) > How she managed to do it with a full-time job (5:42) > The #1 thing that grew her app (7:21) > The metric she obsessed over more than revenue (10:43)

Her app made over $1M. And it all started with a simple personal problem. She looked for the app. It didn't exist. So she built it. I sat down with Ania Wysocka for a couple hours, and here’s the top 5% of our chat: > The problem she solved (2:07) > How she built the MVP with no coding experience (3:26) > How she managed to do it with a full-time job (5:42) > The #1 thing that grew her app (7:21) > The metric she obsessed over more than revenue (10:43)

Starter Story

87,449 views • 4 months ago

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,233,263 views • 2 months ago

PSYCHO CREATED A GOD-MODE SECOND BRAIN ON FABLE 5 THAT FILLS ITS OWN KNOWLEDGE GAPS WHILE YOU SLEEP. KARPATHY'S FILE STRUCTURE MAKES IT POSSIBLE. Everyone wires Claude into Obsidian, posts the graph, and stops. this guy added a third system and it quietly changes the whole game: The full build is in the article below: vault structure, the Claude wiring, the exact prompts, the skills. > Obsidian as the knowledge base, but any notes app works as long as Claude Code can see the files > Karpathy's LLM Wiki doc as the skeleton, so the vault is organized the way a model actually reads, not the way humans decorate folders > a self-learning skill on a weekly loop: scans the entire brain, finds the gaps, then researches YouTube and Google by itself to fill them Read the third one again, actually your notes only ever contain what you happened to write down, and the gap-finder breaks that ceiling: the brain starts knowing things you never told it. Most second brains know what you told them. a real one notices what you didn't. that's the difference between note-taking and compounding. one sits there. the other gets smarter every week whether you showed up or not. P.S. send the article straight to your Claude, tell it to interview you, and the brain starts filling itself tonight.

PSYCHO CREATED A GOD-MODE SECOND BRAIN ON FABLE 5 THAT FILLS ITS OWN KNOWLEDGE GAPS WHILE YOU SLEEP. KARPATHY'S FILE STRUCTURE MAKES IT POSSIBLE. Everyone wires Claude into Obsidian, posts the graph, and stops. this guy added a third system and it quietly changes the whole game: The full build is in the article below: vault structure, the Claude wiring, the exact prompts, the skills. > Obsidian as the knowledge base, but any notes app works as long as Claude Code can see the files > Karpathy's LLM Wiki doc as the skeleton, so the vault is organized the way a model actually reads, not the way humans decorate folders > a self-learning skill on a weekly loop: scans the entire brain, finds the gaps, then researches YouTube and Google by itself to fill them Read the third one again, actually your notes only ever contain what you happened to write down, and the gap-finder breaks that ceiling: the brain starts knowing things you never told it. Most second brains know what you told them. a real one notices what you didn't. that's the difference between note-taking and compounding. one sits there. the other gets smarter every week whether you showed up or not. P.S. send the article straight to your Claude, tell it to interview you, and the brain starts filling itself tonight.

Miraqle

41,307 views • 1 month ago