Should this have been ruled goaltender interference? 🤔

asky literally can’t move to his right, 28 is in the blue paint on his own volition, there’s 1000% goalie interference

oh no it would’ve been 6-1 instead of 7-1

Considering the number of horrendous GI reviews the caps have been screwed on in the past, I’m shocked this was upheld

Yes. He was in the paint without being pushed and prevented asky from moving to his right while tracking the puck to Milano. Could not get set.

Go look at the two that were called back on the Sabres earlier this year. Compared to those this goalie was assaulted

No terrible challenge

Caps have been on the wrong end of more questionable GI calls then any other team in the league consistently for years, if it wasn't called against the Caps on the road then it must have been a bulletproof call

It wasn’t interference.

Spin the wheel of goaltender interference!'

Yes it should have been

This rule sucks it’s up to interpretation and so you never know. As a sharks fan I would say yes because the player wasn’t push and entered the blue on his own then impeded the goalie.

Sharks lost 7-1 who cares. It could even be argued the sharks one goal was even more of an interference play. It was also reviewed and upheld as a goal.

No

yes

Yeah, can’t prevent the goalie from actually playing it

no...lol

Nope.

Nope

No one knows. No one has ever know

Lmao like it would’ve mattered. We would’ve scored 1.5 minutes later anyways. Asky got TORCHED.

Would it have mattered if it was?

Nope Try again next time

Absolutely

I have a feeling that’s not why we lost…lol

Wouldn't have saved you against the Ovi and the crew.

Rigged

That's why the Sharks lost 7-1. Because of the officiating.

Nope

Think it would’ve made a difference…?

🤣😂🤣😂🤣

No

Blown away it wasn’t ruled as GI

Nope