Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

💥Smug Brian Higgins smirks while dismissing the idea that he & Brian Albert’s 22 second phone call was anything of substance. A FEW MOMENTS LATER.. Bev to Higgins Lawyer: “I wanna give you a chance to speak with your client” Higgins Lawyer: “I can do it in about 10 seconds”

DonutsBaga's profile picture

JoeyBagaD🍩nuts

9,906 subscribers

36,508 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Brian Higgins was drinking alcohol at lunchtime on his way back from NY. Brian Higgins dropped his work vehicle back at Canton PD "because it was against their policy"......(to drink and then drive a police issued vehicle), but it's ok to drink and then drive his personal vehicle 🤔 Brian Higgins then went to the Hillside bar and scoffed down another 4-5 alcoholic drinks. From the Hillside, Brian Higgins then went to the Waterfall bar for yet more alcoholic beverages. God knows how many he had there. Brian Higgins then tootled off to 34 Fairview Rd, had one or two beers, because they had no Jameson's. So then Brian Higgins went to the Canton PD to move vehicles (plural) in the carpark. He moved only one vehicle, yet made a phone call at 1.30am. To whom, we'll never know. After that, Brian Higgins tots off home, and admittedly had another couple of mugs of booze. Brian Higgins was intoxicated before he arrived at 34 Fairview. So drunk, that he never saw Karen's car when he got to 34 Fairview, or when he left. In my opinion, Brian Higgins accidentally killed John O'Keefe with his plow, because he was profoundly drunk.
0:29

Brian Higgins was drinking alcohol at lunchtime on his way back from NY. Brian Higgins dropped his work vehicle back at Canton PD "because it was against their policy"......(to drink and then drive a police issued vehicle), but it's ok to drink and then drive his personal vehicle 🤔 Brian Higgins then went to the Hillside bar and scoffed down another 4-5 alcoholic drinks. From the Hillside, Brian Higgins then went to the Waterfall bar for yet more alcoholic beverages. God knows how many he had there. Brian Higgins then tootled off to 34 Fairview Rd, had one or two beers, because they had no Jameson's. So then Brian Higgins went to the Canton PD to move vehicles (plural) in the carpark. He moved only one vehicle, yet made a phone call at 1.30am. To whom, we'll never know. After that, Brian Higgins tots off home, and admittedly had another couple of mugs of booze. Brian Higgins was intoxicated before he arrived at 34 Fairview. So drunk, that he never saw Karen's car when he got to 34 Fairview, or when he left. In my opinion, Brian Higgins accidentally killed John O'Keefe with his plow, because he was profoundly drunk.

RubyD

106,292 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Brian Higgins arrives at 34 Fairview just before Brian Albert and Coco. Remember the plow srory! Brian Albert and Coco enter the house through two different entry points, yet both independently say they saw and spoke with Colin Albert inside. Higgins, however, says He never saw Colin Albert He “wouldn’t even know what Colin Albert looks like if he walked into the courtroom” Sooooo....Two people enter separately and both see Colin. A third person there for roughly an hour sees everyone except Colin. Higgins says he Stayed about one hour, Left through the breezeway doorand Drove directly to the Canton Police Department. CPD surveillance shows Higgins arriving at 1:26 a.m. Dashcam footage establishes 34 Fairview → CPD = 4 minute drive…..If Higgins left around 1:20–1:22 a.m., the timeline works. He does not leave CPD until 1:46 a.m. Higgins testified he got home at 1:40 a.m. He said once home, he Ate, Had a couple of drinks Went to bed CPD surveillance shows Higgins did not leave the station until 1:46 a.m. He cannot be home at 1:40 if he is still inside CPD at 1:46. From CPD to West Roxbury Minimum 15 minutes under normal conditions Longer in a blizzard, which this was sooo Earliest realistic arrival home 2:05–2:10 a.m., not 1:40 a.m. At 2:22 a.m. Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins, 17 seconds later Higgins calls Albert back Both men claim these were “butt dials” The 2:22 a.m. calls line up far more realistically with, Higgins just arriving home, or Higgins still awake and active...Not Already home for 40+ minutes Finished eating Drinking and In bed sleeping The next morning He returned to 34 Fairview around 7:00 a.m. He claims he saw only one police vehicle present. He says he stayed less than an hour. Well At 7:00 a.m., the following vehicles should have been present….Gallagher Lank Saraf Mullaney Goody’s vehicle would also be there or had already left (he went to retrieve the leaf blower). Seeing only one police vehicle at 7:00 a.m. does not match the known scene activity. According to Higgins Inside the house was Brian Albert Sr. Coco Brian Albert Jr. Jen McCabe Matt McCabe and Julie arrives later around 8:00–8:30 a.m. with donuts. Brian Albert Jr. states he never saw Higgins that morning. Higgins says he saw jr.... Multiple adults present and NO CPD saw higgins I think the issue here is jen hadn't started the timeline Yet, for everybody
3:09

Brian Higgins arrives at 34 Fairview just before Brian Albert and Coco. Remember the plow srory! Brian Albert and Coco enter the house through two different entry points, yet both independently say they saw and spoke with Colin Albert inside. Higgins, however, says He never saw Colin Albert He “wouldn’t even know what Colin Albert looks like if he walked into the courtroom” Sooooo....Two people enter separately and both see Colin. A third person there for roughly an hour sees everyone except Colin. Higgins says he Stayed about one hour, Left through the breezeway doorand Drove directly to the Canton Police Department. CPD surveillance shows Higgins arriving at 1:26 a.m. Dashcam footage establishes 34 Fairview → CPD = 4 minute drive…..If Higgins left around 1:20–1:22 a.m., the timeline works. He does not leave CPD until 1:46 a.m. Higgins testified he got home at 1:40 a.m. He said once home, he Ate, Had a couple of drinks Went to bed CPD surveillance shows Higgins did not leave the station until 1:46 a.m. He cannot be home at 1:40 if he is still inside CPD at 1:46. From CPD to West Roxbury Minimum 15 minutes under normal conditions Longer in a blizzard, which this was sooo Earliest realistic arrival home 2:05–2:10 a.m., not 1:40 a.m. At 2:22 a.m. Brian Albert calls Brian Higgins, 17 seconds later Higgins calls Albert back Both men claim these were “butt dials” The 2:22 a.m. calls line up far more realistically with, Higgins just arriving home, or Higgins still awake and active...Not Already home for 40+ minutes Finished eating Drinking and In bed sleeping The next morning He returned to 34 Fairview around 7:00 a.m. He claims he saw only one police vehicle present. He says he stayed less than an hour. Well At 7:00 a.m., the following vehicles should have been present….Gallagher Lank Saraf Mullaney Goody’s vehicle would also be there or had already left (he went to retrieve the leaf blower). Seeing only one police vehicle at 7:00 a.m. does not match the known scene activity. According to Higgins Inside the house was Brian Albert Sr. Coco Brian Albert Jr. Jen McCabe Matt McCabe and Julie arrives later around 8:00–8:30 a.m. with donuts. Brian Albert Jr. states he never saw Higgins that morning. Higgins says he saw jr.... Multiple adults present and NO CPD saw higgins I think the issue here is jen hadn't started the timeline Yet, for everybody

Dixie Normus

30,755 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

If Brian Higgins was physically at Canton PD at 9:26 AM on January 29, why wasn’t he interviewed by State Police then and why did they wait days? Brian Higgins arrives at Canton Police Department at 9:26 AM Yuri Bukhenik testifies he arrives around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor is already there Higgins is a law-enforcement officer a known attendee at the house someone who had recent contact with John O’Keefe someone who later admits to phone deletion and replacement That makes him a priority interview, not a casual witness. Higgins was another badge from another agency, already inside the building, overlapping socially with other key figures. Delaying his interview insulated him from spontaneous questioning, recorded inconsistencies, and early device preservation. This isn’t about what Higgins eventually said. It’s about what wasn’t captured, what changed before it was captured,what evidence window closed Once days pass, phones get replaced, messages disappear,stories converge That bell cannot be unrung. Yuri Bukhenik testified that He arrived at Canton Police Department around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor was already there, They were at CPD before going to Jen McCabe’s house At 9:00–9:20 Michael Lank is back at Brian Albert’s house because Jen McCabe “forgot to tell him something” and called him back 9:40 Brian Albert calls Kevin Albert 9:50 Brian Albert Missed incoming call from Chief Berkowitz 9:54 Brian Albert calls Chief Berkowitz (4m 40s) So while Lank has just been at Brian Albert’s house Higgins has just arrived at CPD Yuri and Proctor claim to be staging the next steps …the Chief of Police is directly communicating with Brian Albert, a homeowner and witness.
0:52

If Brian Higgins was physically at Canton PD at 9:26 AM on January 29, why wasn’t he interviewed by State Police then and why did they wait days? Brian Higgins arrives at Canton Police Department at 9:26 AM Yuri Bukhenik testifies he arrives around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor is already there Higgins is a law-enforcement officer a known attendee at the house someone who had recent contact with John O’Keefe someone who later admits to phone deletion and replacement That makes him a priority interview, not a casual witness. Higgins was another badge from another agency, already inside the building, overlapping socially with other key figures. Delaying his interview insulated him from spontaneous questioning, recorded inconsistencies, and early device preservation. This isn’t about what Higgins eventually said. It’s about what wasn’t captured, what changed before it was captured,what evidence window closed Once days pass, phones get replaced, messages disappear,stories converge That bell cannot be unrung. Yuri Bukhenik testified that He arrived at Canton Police Department around 9:15 AM Michael Proctor was already there, They were at CPD before going to Jen McCabe’s house At 9:00–9:20 Michael Lank is back at Brian Albert’s house because Jen McCabe “forgot to tell him something” and called him back 9:40 Brian Albert calls Kevin Albert 9:50 Brian Albert Missed incoming call from Chief Berkowitz 9:54 Brian Albert calls Chief Berkowitz (4m 40s) So while Lank has just been at Brian Albert’s house Higgins has just arrived at CPD Yuri and Proctor claim to be staging the next steps …the Chief of Police is directly communicating with Brian Albert, a homeowner and witness.

Dixie Normus

24,189 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I find it fascinating that the attorneys representing the HAM plaintiffs, and their online cohorts, are bringing up the FBI Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory (RCFL) when discussing phone evidence. Because one of the HAMs themselves, Brian Higgins, actually used that resource for his own phone. On January 30th, 2022, Higgins called his "best friend" ATF Agent Matt Kelch, who Higgins described as being good with the "phone stuff." He asked Kelch how he could "pull text strings off (his) phone" so he could provide them to state police. For timeline-wise, this phone call occurred one day after the death of John O'Keefe. Kelch walked him through it, and Higgins went to the FBI RCFL facility and used a kiosk on the first floor to extract selected information from his phone. Flash forward to September 22nd, 2022 when Karen Read's defense team publicly sought an order requiring Higgins to preserve his phone for forensic examination. Six days later, with the preservation order about to be served, Higgins got a new phone and changed his number. The next day, September 30th, he is officially served. Higgins was eventually interviewed by federal prosecutors in May of 2023 and discussed what he had done with the phone. During this portion of trial testimony, it is revealed that Higgins had removed the "cut or broken" SIM card from his original phone, possibly destroyed that same phone and threw away the two items at two different dumpsters on a military base. It was also testified to that he was eventually placed on desk duty, but the public record doesn't establish why. Could his use of a federal forensic resource in the RCFL building to extract information from his personal phone have played a role? I don't know. But considering Higgins' lawsuit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney includes claims involving his employment and professional reputation, discovery could potentially shed light on why he was placed on leave/desk duty, what his supervisors knew about the phone, and whether those events were connected. Maybe future filings will finally answer that question. 🫠
5:16

I find it fascinating that the attorneys representing the HAM plaintiffs, and their online cohorts, are bringing up the FBI Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory (RCFL) when discussing phone evidence. Because one of the HAMs themselves, Brian Higgins, actually used that resource for his own phone. On January 30th, 2022, Higgins called his "best friend" ATF Agent Matt Kelch, who Higgins described as being good with the "phone stuff." He asked Kelch how he could "pull text strings off (his) phone" so he could provide them to state police. For timeline-wise, this phone call occurred one day after the death of John O'Keefe. Kelch walked him through it, and Higgins went to the FBI RCFL facility and used a kiosk on the first floor to extract selected information from his phone. Flash forward to September 22nd, 2022 when Karen Read's defense team publicly sought an order requiring Higgins to preserve his phone for forensic examination. Six days later, with the preservation order about to be served, Higgins got a new phone and changed his number. The next day, September 30th, he is officially served. Higgins was eventually interviewed by federal prosecutors in May of 2023 and discussed what he had done with the phone. During this portion of trial testimony, it is revealed that Higgins had removed the "cut or broken" SIM card from his original phone, possibly destroyed that same phone and threw away the two items at two different dumpsters on a military base. It was also testified to that he was eventually placed on desk duty, but the public record doesn't establish why. Could his use of a federal forensic resource in the RCFL building to extract information from his personal phone have played a role? I don't know. But considering Higgins' lawsuit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney includes claims involving his employment and professional reputation, discovery could potentially shed light on why he was placed on leave/desk duty, what his supervisors knew about the phone, and whether those events were connected. Maybe future filings will finally answer that question. 🫠

BoozeyBeauty

28,120 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

.nick wright has a message for Bengals fans: “I have felt for 2 years that the pragmatic, prudent thing to do with the Cincinnati Bengals was to decide Chase or Higgins. It was pretty obviously to me Chase, and then get a real draft haul for Higgins.”
2:28

.nick wright has a message for Bengals fans: “I have felt for 2 years that the pragmatic, prudent thing to do with the Cincinnati Bengals was to decide Chase or Higgins. It was pretty obviously to me Chase, and then get a real draft haul for Higgins.”

First Things First

140,624 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Timeline Question of the Day So just to recap… Brian Higgins testified that Chief Berkowitz called him early in the morning about John O’Keefe, a call Higgins says he missed. But here’s the fun part No one testified that they called Berkowitz. No one testified that they spoke to Berkowitz before 6:30 AM. Higgins says he called Brian Albert first, Then he headed straight to 34 Fairview So naturally the question becomes… Who told Berkowitz? When did they tell him? And how did he know to call Higgins before Higgins knew anything? No one admits calling Berkowitz, Yet Berkowitz somehow had the info early enough to be calling people Amazing work, everyone. This timeline didn’t just have a hangover it woke up knowing things before anyone told it. Before testifying, Brian Higgins probably should’ve called Jen McCabe first. Not about the facts, but about how to make time bend, how to shave an hour off a drive, and how to be asleep and awake at the same time. She could’ve helped him, Leave at 12:30 but arrive at 1:26 Drive 9 miles in a blizzard in record time, Have drinks, eat, go to bed, answer 2:22 AM calls, and still be “asleep” Run on 4 hours of sleep after spending the day in NYC, driving back to canton, bar hopping, 34 Fairview, CPD, and a full day back at the station And maybe most importantly Explain how to testify with a timeline hangover that bad Missed opportunity, honestly. Jen’s got experience making the math work. even the phone calls have no witnesses
2:35

Timeline Question of the Day So just to recap… Brian Higgins testified that Chief Berkowitz called him early in the morning about John O’Keefe, a call Higgins says he missed. But here’s the fun part No one testified that they called Berkowitz. No one testified that they spoke to Berkowitz before 6:30 AM. Higgins says he called Brian Albert first, Then he headed straight to 34 Fairview So naturally the question becomes… Who told Berkowitz? When did they tell him? And how did he know to call Higgins before Higgins knew anything? No one admits calling Berkowitz, Yet Berkowitz somehow had the info early enough to be calling people Amazing work, everyone. This timeline didn’t just have a hangover it woke up knowing things before anyone told it. Before testifying, Brian Higgins probably should’ve called Jen McCabe first. Not about the facts, but about how to make time bend, how to shave an hour off a drive, and how to be asleep and awake at the same time. She could’ve helped him, Leave at 12:30 but arrive at 1:26 Drive 9 miles in a blizzard in record time, Have drinks, eat, go to bed, answer 2:22 AM calls, and still be “asleep” Run on 4 hours of sleep after spending the day in NYC, driving back to canton, bar hopping, 34 Fairview, CPD, and a full day back at the station And maybe most importantly Explain how to testify with a timeline hangover that bad Missed opportunity, honestly. Jen’s got experience making the math work. even the phone calls have no witnesses

Dixie Normus

36,104 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.
2:08

DISPROVING KAREN READ'S DEFENSE: BRIAN HIGGINS Karen Read and her legal team have propped up their insane third party culprit theory with a self-constructed romantic fantasy between Read and Higgins that did not exist in reality. As revealed in the first trial, Read and Brian Higgins had exchanged several awkward texts, shared an odd kiss, and met at Higgins apartment in what Higgins explained was an uncomfortable visit after Read had been out drinking with a friend. Read was the initiator and aggressor in all these instances. The last communication between the two occurred the evening of January 23rd with Read texting "Phone works ↔️". Higgins responded "Thought you were all set". This is not the response of a man madly in love with a woman and pining for her and certainly not the response one would expect from a man so blindly enamored he was willing to murder a friend to take his place. Instead what we see is a detached response. The next reply was from Read with her stating "With talking? No.." It is Read's response here that indicates she is the one with interest. Not convinced, Higgins responds "Hmmmm. Well" to which Read does not respond. If Higgins truly wanted Read, he would have continued texting that night pushing to rekindle but their communication stops until he sees her the night of the 28th. She was out of sight, out of mind for him. The "Ummm. Well" he texted her that night lends itself far more to a drunk text than how the defense has categorized it as an angry response from being rebuffed, which he hadn't been. Higgins summed up his interactions with Read as strange, "uncomfortable" and as having a "weird vibe". This was not a man who was in love with Read and the notion he would even exchange one heated word with John over Read is beyond ludicrous.

Julie Carpenter

16,137 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

JUST IN 🚨🚨🚨 "I'm sending these 3 whores home. 4 hour minimum." - Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe to ATF Agent Brian Higgins on December 18, 2021. I have just uncovered text messages making it clear that John O'Keefe and Brian Higgins were involved with hiring prostitutes in the months before John's death on January 29, 2022. Upon doing so, as I was reviewing the text messages on live stream and found that specific line, I threw a water bottle at the wall and lost my last semblance of faith in the now-collapsing edifice America once called a justice system. We will rebuild, but first we must reflect. Of note: the source file containing these messages is incredibly difficult to read but, after about an hour, I was able to put together the big secret (and I am horrified). Also, Higgins --out of no where-- told John that a Boston Cop had been "hit by a truck" earlier in that same text message conversation. I also found text where John and Higgins were talking about "bars over charging for drinks" before John outright mentioned buying prostitutes. Source regarding "whores" page 9 out of 12, text message 10 - Source regarding Higgins mentioning a Boston Cop who was hit by a truck (page 7-8 out of 12, text messages 15, 14 and 13) -
18:03

Sensitive content

JUST IN 🚨🚨🚨 "I'm sending these 3 whores home. 4 hour minimum." - Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe to ATF Agent Brian Higgins on December 18, 2021. I have just uncovered text messages making it clear that John O'Keefe and Brian Higgins were involved with hiring prostitutes in the months before John's death on January 29, 2022. Upon doing so, as I was reviewing the text messages on live stream and found that specific line, I threw a water bottle at the wall and lost my last semblance of faith in the now-collapsing edifice America once called a justice system. We will rebuild, but first we must reflect. Of note: the source file containing these messages is incredibly difficult to read but, after about an hour, I was able to put together the big secret (and I am horrified). Also, Higgins --out of no where-- told John that a Boston Cop had been "hit by a truck" earlier in that same text message conversation. I also found text where John and Higgins were talking about "bars over charging for drinks" before John outright mentioned buying prostitutes. Source regarding "whores" page 9 out of 12, text message 10 - Source regarding Higgins mentioning a Boston Cop who was hit by a truck (page 7-8 out of 12, text messages 15, 14 and 13) -

Grant Smith Ellis

25,302 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Brian Higgins will always be my # 1 suspect in the death of John O’Keefe - He destroyed & disposed his phone + sim card, perjured himself on the stand, took a proffer with the government & had the MOTIVE over anyone else. It isn’t a difficult concept for me. 🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead
0:14

Brian Higgins will always be my # 1 suspect in the death of John O’Keefe - He destroyed & disposed his phone + sim card, perjured himself on the stand, took a proffer with the government & had the MOTIVE over anyone else. It isn’t a difficult concept for me. 🤷🏻‍♀️ #KarenRead

Eve✨

29,167 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Brian Higgins was apparently interviewed by investigators at his lawyers house in Sharon, MA, with his lawyer present. The Commonwealth wants you to believe Brian Higgins is merely an innocent “witness”. Karen Read was immediately open and forthcoming with investigators, and did not demand to be interviewed at her lawyer’s office, house, or even to have a lawyer present. Karen Read also didn’t illegally use federal resources to cherry pick and curate a packet of printed out text messages she deemed relevant to law enforcement’s investigation. Who does this?! Brian Higgins did this. And that’s before he destroyed his cellphone and disposed of it on a military base right before a court preservation order, changed his phone number and phone carrier. Karen Read did none of those things and happily turned over her phone to investigators on day 1, despite them having no search warrant for it. Yuri Bukhenik is so blind to his State Police Detective Unit’s clear and overwhelming bias when it comes to investigating crimes involving fellow law-enforcement. This is reflected in the preferential treatment with which they afford these law enforcement officers for their otherwise suspicious actions. Much like Michael Proctor’s text messages: “I’m sure the owner of the house will receive some shit.” “Nope.” “Homeowner’s a Boston cop too.” #KarenRead #BrianHiggins #YuriBukhenik #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:53

Brian Higgins was apparently interviewed by investigators at his lawyers house in Sharon, MA, with his lawyer present. The Commonwealth wants you to believe Brian Higgins is merely an innocent “witness”. Karen Read was immediately open and forthcoming with investigators, and did not demand to be interviewed at her lawyer’s office, house, or even to have a lawyer present. Karen Read also didn’t illegally use federal resources to cherry pick and curate a packet of printed out text messages she deemed relevant to law enforcement’s investigation. Who does this?! Brian Higgins did this. And that’s before he destroyed his cellphone and disposed of it on a military base right before a court preservation order, changed his phone number and phone carrier. Karen Read did none of those things and happily turned over her phone to investigators on day 1, despite them having no search warrant for it. Yuri Bukhenik is so blind to his State Police Detective Unit’s clear and overwhelming bias when it comes to investigating crimes involving fellow law-enforcement. This is reflected in the preferential treatment with which they afford these law enforcement officers for their otherwise suspicious actions. Much like Michael Proctor’s text messages: “I’m sure the owner of the house will receive some shit.” “Nope.” “Homeowner’s a Boston cop too.” #KarenRead #BrianHiggins #YuriBukhenik #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

99,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Did Miami Mayoral Candidate Eileen Higgins Lie About Canceled Election? Higgins resigned her Miami-Dade County Commission seat three years early to run for City of Miami mayor in November. But when candidate Emilio Gonzalez sued last summer to stop the city from canceling the election, Higgins DISAPPEARED and, later, took credit (and fundraised on) a court victory she had nothing to do with. After Higgins insisted on the #BecauseMiami podcast that she did not benefit from the postponement, multiple sources say she’s lying…
1:37

Did Miami Mayoral Candidate Eileen Higgins Lie About Canceled Election? Higgins resigned her Miami-Dade County Commission seat three years early to run for City of Miami mayor in November. But when candidate Emilio Gonzalez sued last summer to stop the city from canceling the election, Higgins DISAPPEARED and, later, took credit (and fundraised on) a court victory she had nothing to do with. After Higgins insisted on the #BecauseMiami podcast that she did not benefit from the postponement, multiple sources say she’s lying…

Billy Corben

10,342 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

PabloReports: If you are grading President Trump on the economy, what grade would you give him? Higgins: They'd have to create a new report card with something above an A. He rates like an A+ Bigly. PabloReports: What would you grade him in terms of the Iran War? Higgins: An A. An A+ if he can finish the job in the next two weeks.
3:09

PabloReports: If you are grading President Trump on the economy, what grade would you give him? Higgins: They'd have to create a new report card with something above an A. He rates like an A+ Bigly. PabloReports: What would you grade him in terms of the Iran War? Higgins: An A. An A+ if he can finish the job in the next two weeks.

MeidasTouch

235,392 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Joe Flacco admits he was nervous the first time throwing to Ja'Marr Chase & Tee Higgins 😂 "The first couple times I threw to Ja'Marr and Tee I was a little bit nervous ... I want them to know I can put some nice touch on it."
0:34

Joe Flacco admits he was nervous the first time throwing to Ja'Marr Chase & Tee Higgins 😂 "The first couple times I threw to Ja'Marr and Tee I was a little bit nervous ... I want them to know I can put some nice touch on it."

Fitz & Whit

541,172 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The The FOURensic Room dropped a bomb 💣 tonight. Alan Jackson karen read showed up at #brianhiggins home in September of 2023 hoping to get Higgins to “flip.” Unfortunately, Read & Jackson are unaware that there are people out there, unlike themselves, with integrity…. Brian Higgins is one of those people. 💙🩵💙 Take a listen to what Read and her slimy entourage attempted. #karenread #alanjackson #brianhiggins Thank you! 💙
13:30

The The FOURensic Room dropped a bomb 💣 tonight. Alan Jackson karen read showed up at #brianhiggins home in September of 2023 hoping to get Higgins to “flip.” Unfortunately, Read & Jackson are unaware that there are people out there, unlike themselves, with integrity…. Brian Higgins is one of those people. 💙🩵💙 Take a listen to what Read and her slimy entourage attempted. #karenread #alanjackson #brianhiggins Thank you! 💙

Andie (Albert) Dufrense

18,674 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Karen Read's defense team filed a motion today that included new video of Brian Higgins at CPD, which was withheld from them in the first trial. The surveillance video shows Brian Higgins pacing around outside, talking to someone on his phone at 1:34 AM. He NEVER mentioned speaking to anyone on the phone at the trial, or at the state or federal grand jury. Had he done so the defense could've filed a Rule 17 motion for his phone, which would be a lot stronger and less likely to be deemed a "fishing expedition" if they had video of him talking on the phone. He testified at trial that he was back home in West Roxbury by 1:40, and that it took 15-20 minutes to get there. This was all a lie, as was his excuse for being at CPD in the first place. This is a Brady violation.
0:11

Karen Read's defense team filed a motion today that included new video of Brian Higgins at CPD, which was withheld from them in the first trial. The surveillance video shows Brian Higgins pacing around outside, talking to someone on his phone at 1:34 AM. He NEVER mentioned speaking to anyone on the phone at the trial, or at the state or federal grand jury. Had he done so the defense could've filed a Rule 17 motion for his phone, which would be a lot stronger and less likely to be deemed a "fishing expedition" if they had video of him talking on the phone. He testified at trial that he was back home in West Roxbury by 1:40, and that it took 15-20 minutes to get there. This was all a lie, as was his excuse for being at CPD in the first place. This is a Brady violation.

Aidan Kearney

305,625 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Wow. Someone is attempting to censor my journalism on X (using bad faith spammed reports) about a massive new revelation regarding John O'Keefe texting Brian Higgins about "sending these 3 wh***s home...4 hour minimum." I have escalated this to X and I'm now tagging Nikita Bier (and Elon Musk). The reporting that is being censored by those bad-faith reports is as follows (and I hope the accounts attempting to engage in that censorship can be tracked down and removed from this wonderful platform); JUST IN 🚨🚨🚨 "I'm sending these 3 wh***s home. 4 hour minimum." - Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe to ATF Agent Brian Higgins on December 18, 2021. I have just uncovered text messages making it clear that John O'Keefe and Brian Higgins were involved with hiring prostitutes in the months before John's death on January 29, 2022. Upon doing so, as I was reviewing the text messages on live stream and found that specific line, I threw a water bottle at the wall and lost my last semblance of faith in the now-collapsing edifice America once called a justice system. We will rebuild, but first we must reflect. Of note: the source file containing these messages is incredibly difficult to read but, after about an hour, I was able to put together the big secret (and I am horrified). Also, Higgins --out of no where-- told John that a Boston Cop had been "hit by a truck" earlier in that same text message conversation. I also found text where John and Higgins were talking about "bars over charging for drinks" before John outright mentioned buying prostitutes. Source regarding "wh***s" page 9 out of 12, text message 10 - Source regarding Higgins mentioning a Boston Cop who was hit by a truck (page 7-8 out of 12, text messages 15, 14 and 13) -
6:43

Wow. Someone is attempting to censor my journalism on X (using bad faith spammed reports) about a massive new revelation regarding John O'Keefe texting Brian Higgins about "sending these 3 wh***s home...4 hour minimum." I have escalated this to X and I'm now tagging Nikita Bier (and Elon Musk). The reporting that is being censored by those bad-faith reports is as follows (and I hope the accounts attempting to engage in that censorship can be tracked down and removed from this wonderful platform); JUST IN 🚨🚨🚨 "I'm sending these 3 wh***s home. 4 hour minimum." - Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe to ATF Agent Brian Higgins on December 18, 2021. I have just uncovered text messages making it clear that John O'Keefe and Brian Higgins were involved with hiring prostitutes in the months before John's death on January 29, 2022. Upon doing so, as I was reviewing the text messages on live stream and found that specific line, I threw a water bottle at the wall and lost my last semblance of faith in the now-collapsing edifice America once called a justice system. We will rebuild, but first we must reflect. Of note: the source file containing these messages is incredibly difficult to read but, after about an hour, I was able to put together the big secret (and I am horrified). Also, Higgins --out of no where-- told John that a Boston Cop had been "hit by a truck" earlier in that same text message conversation. I also found text where John and Higgins were talking about "bars over charging for drinks" before John outright mentioned buying prostitutes. Source regarding "wh***s" page 9 out of 12, text message 10 - Source regarding Higgins mentioning a Boston Cop who was hit by a truck (page 7-8 out of 12, text messages 15, 14 and 13) -

Grant Smith Ellis

296,058 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten