Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Some more thoughts about Yann interview: Even if LLMs work great, that's missing the point. Everyone's doing the same thing now. More scale, more data, longer CoT, tweak RL. But the path to get there was completely stochastic. Attention, transformers, scaling laws, RLHF, none of it was obvious, it...

ziv_ravid's profile picture

Ravid Shwartz Ziv

11,919 subscribers

57,486 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеНовости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“There are more companies than ideas by quite a bit. Compute is large enough such that it's not obvious that you need that much more compute to prove some idea. AlexNet was built on 2 GPUs. The transformer was built on 8 to 64 GPUs. Which would be, what, 2 GPUs of today? You could argue that o1 reasoning was not the most compute heavy thing in the world. For research, you definitely need some amount of compute, but it's far from obvious that you need the absolutely largest amount of compute. If everyone is within the same paradigm, then compute becomes one of the big differentiators.” Ilya Sutskever
2:03

“There are more companies than ideas by quite a bit. Compute is large enough such that it's not obvious that you need that much more compute to prove some idea. AlexNet was built on 2 GPUs. The transformer was built on 8 to 64 GPUs. Which would be, what, 2 GPUs of today? You could argue that o1 reasoning was not the most compute heavy thing in the world. For research, you definitely need some amount of compute, but it's far from obvious that you need the absolutely largest amount of compute. If everyone is within the same paradigm, then compute becomes one of the big differentiators.” Ilya Sutskever

Dwarkesh Patel

203,605 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.Ilya Sutskever on why OpenAI gave up on robotics: "Progress comes from the combination of compute and data. There was no path to data from robotics. I'd say that now it is possible to create a path forward, but one needs to really commit. You could imagine a gradual path of improvement where you build more robots, they do more things, you collect more data and so on. But you need to really love robots and need to be really willing to solve all the physical and logistical problems of dealing with them. It's not the same as software at all."
1:57

.Ilya Sutskever on why OpenAI gave up on robotics: "Progress comes from the combination of compute and data. There was no path to data from robotics. I'd say that now it is possible to create a path forward, but one needs to really commit. You could imagine a gradual path of improvement where you build more robots, they do more things, you collect more data and so on. But you need to really love robots and need to be really willing to solve all the physical and logistical problems of dealing with them. It's not the same as software at all."

Dwarkesh Patel

325,820 просмотров • 2 лет назад

MacFarlane: These things would land more if the DOJ was not an extension of the WH, which it is. It is deeply politicized. It is sycophantic. But I also think this is going to beg the question, how much more are we going to hear about preemptive pardons? I think that that's going to echo more as the weeks go on.
1:56

MacFarlane: These things would land more if the DOJ was not an extension of the WH, which it is. It is deeply politicized. It is sycophantic. But I also think this is going to beg the question, how much more are we going to hear about preemptive pardons? I think that that's going to echo more as the weeks go on.

Acyn

31,511 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#ZeePrukLiveBD2025 🐺: "Is 23 years old different from 33?" Back then, at 23, I had already graduated. By the time I entered DomundiTV, I was around 23, if I remember correctly. At that time, it was really different, because I didn't know how to do anything at all. I didn't even know what working really was. Simply put, that was the stage of life when I had just graduated from university. I didn't know how to work yet, because when I studied, I only studied. The kind of work I did was just university assignments, not real working life. So after graduation, I started to learn more about working. I met more people, encountered more personalities, which is normal. I faced more kinds of work, more things I had to learn. I just tried to learn along the way, tried to be the best version of myself and gradually learning. It was actually fun, because the more people you meet, the more you grow. The more diverse the work or society you face, the more you grow, and you gain new perspectives and insights. I really like one phrase from my mom: "When you grow up, you'll understand it yourself." Back then, I didn't believe it at all, but they turned out to be so true. Because age has no boundaries, but age automatically makes us precipitate many things. No matter who we are, what type of person, what kind of character we have, in the end, our age will help us crystallize many thoughts about which path we want to choose in life, whether it's good or bad, or whether we want to be this or that. But… how to say… we shouldn't take advantage of anyone, because everyone is different. That's right. #ZeePruk Z #ZunShine
2:02

#ZeePrukLiveBD2025 🐺: "Is 23 years old different from 33?" Back then, at 23, I had already graduated. By the time I entered DomundiTV, I was around 23, if I remember correctly. At that time, it was really different, because I didn't know how to do anything at all. I didn't even know what working really was. Simply put, that was the stage of life when I had just graduated from university. I didn't know how to work yet, because when I studied, I only studied. The kind of work I did was just university assignments, not real working life. So after graduation, I started to learn more about working. I met more people, encountered more personalities, which is normal. I faced more kinds of work, more things I had to learn. I just tried to learn along the way, tried to be the best version of myself and gradually learning. It was actually fun, because the more people you meet, the more you grow. The more diverse the work or society you face, the more you grow, and you gain new perspectives and insights. I really like one phrase from my mom: "When you grow up, you'll understand it yourself." Back then, I didn't believe it at all, but they turned out to be so true. Because age has no boundaries, but age automatically makes us precipitate many things. No matter who we are, what type of person, what kind of character we have, in the end, our age will help us crystallize many thoughts about which path we want to choose in life, whether it's good or bad, or whether we want to be this or that. But… how to say… we shouldn't take advantage of anyone, because everyone is different. That's right. #ZeePruk Z #ZunShine

Zee Pruk Vietnam | บ้าน ซี พฤกษ์ พานิช เวียดนาม

11,238 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."
2:04

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."

TBPN

21,055 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."
1:15

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."

Patrick OShaughnessy

33,016 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Chris Bryant, "The single biggest challenge is the state of the NHS" #BBCQT "That needed reform and money" "Everyone applauds the £22 billion extra but not where the money comes from, we had to do an increase in national insurance" "An example of a reform where England is learning from Wales.. When a GP reckons you've got to go to a consultant and you might need a diagnostic test as well" "In England you go to the consultant, then to the diagnostic then back to the consultant" "In Wales, GPs have been able to go to the diagnostic" "We're now doing that in England" "Nobody is taking money away from people on PIP" "There will be more people on PIP in the next few years, but the umber isn't going to be increasing by a thousand every week" "We need to get more people into work" Fiona Bruce, "So no one who gets PIP now is going to lose it" Chris Bryant, "They're not going to lose it till their next reassessment.. 90% of people will not lose anything"
3:21

Chris Bryant, "The single biggest challenge is the state of the NHS" #BBCQT "That needed reform and money" "Everyone applauds the £22 billion extra but not where the money comes from, we had to do an increase in national insurance" "An example of a reform where England is learning from Wales.. When a GP reckons you've got to go to a consultant and you might need a diagnostic test as well" "In England you go to the consultant, then to the diagnostic then back to the consultant" "In Wales, GPs have been able to go to the diagnostic" "We're now doing that in England" "Nobody is taking money away from people on PIP" "There will be more people on PIP in the next few years, but the umber isn't going to be increasing by a thousand every week" "We need to get more people into work" Fiona Bruce, "So no one who gets PIP now is going to lose it" Chris Bryant, "They're not going to lose it till their next reassessment.. 90% of people will not lose anything"

Farrukh

57,213 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk: 𝕏 is simply trying to adhere to the law. If the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. "What we're trying to do is simply adhere to the laws in a country. If something is illegal in the United States, or if it's illegal in Europe or Brazil or wherever it might be, then we will take it down, and we'll suspend the account because we're not there to make the laws. But if speech is not illegal, then what are we doing? Now we're injecting ourselves in as a censor. And where does it stop? And who decides? Where does that path lead? I think it leads to a bad place. So, if the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. But otherwise, we're going to obey the law in each jurisdiction. That's it. It's not more complicated than that. We're not trying to flout the law. We're trying to adhere to the law. And if the laws change, we will change. And if the laws don't change, we won't. We're just literally trying to adhere to the law." From: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024
1:06

Elon Musk: 𝕏 is simply trying to adhere to the law. If the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. "What we're trying to do is simply adhere to the laws in a country. If something is illegal in the United States, or if it's illegal in Europe or Brazil or wherever it might be, then we will take it down, and we'll suspend the account because we're not there to make the laws. But if speech is not illegal, then what are we doing? Now we're injecting ourselves in as a censor. And where does it stop? And who decides? Where does that path lead? I think it leads to a bad place. So, if the people in a country want the laws to be different, they should make the laws different. But otherwise, we're going to obey the law in each jurisdiction. That's it. It's not more complicated than that. We're not trying to flout the law. We're trying to adhere to the law. And if the laws change, we will change. And if the laws don't change, we won't. We're just literally trying to adhere to the law." From: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

ELON CLIPS

5,539,295 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dario Amodei reveals the two convictions that made him leave OpenAI to start Anthropic "The first conviction was the scaling laws" "If you scale up models, give them more data and more compute, you find incredible increases in performance. I was finding that in 2019 with GPT-2" "There were a lot of folks inside and outside who didn't believe it at all. We made the case to leadership, this is going to be a big deal" "The second was, if these models are going to match the capability of the human brain, we better get this right" "Despite a lot of language about doing it in the right way, I was just not convinced there was a real and serious conviction to do it the right way"
4:12

Dario Amodei reveals the two convictions that made him leave OpenAI to start Anthropic "The first conviction was the scaling laws" "If you scale up models, give them more data and more compute, you find incredible increases in performance. I was finding that in 2019 with GPT-2" "There were a lot of folks inside and outside who didn't believe it at all. We made the case to leadership, this is going to be a big deal" "The second was, if these models are going to match the capability of the human brain, we better get this right" "Despite a lot of language about doing it in the right way, I was just not convinced there was a real and serious conviction to do it the right way"

Jaynit Makwana

246,201 просмотров • 21 дней назад

lando talking about how special it feels for him to win constructors’ titles after starting with the team in tougher times and their dominance 🥹❤️‍🩹 “i mean another one is just a great thing. it's another constructor feels the same as the first, because to get the first was quite an achievement if you still look at where we were just three years ago. we've overtaken every team in terms of development. we've outdone them by a long way in terms of development, and in a time when it's almost harder to do than ever, with more restrictions and less wind tunnel time, all of those different things, budget cap, that's really been more in our favor over the last five years comparing to the budget that the other teams could run at. but in a time when it should be more difficult than ever to dominate, that's exactly what the team have done and given us, by a long way, the best car on the grid. i mean, it's always a very nice thing to say. every driver that gets to say that always puts a smile on your face. but we've also done very well as a team in terms of drivers between oscar and myself pushing each other and delivering every single weekend. and you don't see that on any other team. so i think we're also very proud of that as drivers. but for me, i've been with mclaren since i started. especially it was a very different time and different place then to where we are now. so that journey makes it more special to know the downs because that's a lot of what it was back then to see the rise that we've had to see the teamwork, the changes, the atmosphere difference and the leadership from zak, from andrea especially, has turned things around and made us as a team the best in the world. and that's something that many people don't ever get to say”
1:53

lando talking about how special it feels for him to win constructors’ titles after starting with the team in tougher times and their dominance 🥹❤️‍🩹 “i mean another one is just a great thing. it's another constructor feels the same as the first, because to get the first was quite an achievement if you still look at where we were just three years ago. we've overtaken every team in terms of development. we've outdone them by a long way in terms of development, and in a time when it's almost harder to do than ever, with more restrictions and less wind tunnel time, all of those different things, budget cap, that's really been more in our favor over the last five years comparing to the budget that the other teams could run at. but in a time when it should be more difficult than ever to dominate, that's exactly what the team have done and given us, by a long way, the best car on the grid. i mean, it's always a very nice thing to say. every driver that gets to say that always puts a smile on your face. but we've also done very well as a team in terms of drivers between oscar and myself pushing each other and delivering every single weekend. and you don't see that on any other team. so i think we're also very proud of that as drivers. but for me, i've been with mclaren since i started. especially it was a very different time and different place then to where we are now. so that journey makes it more special to know the downs because that's a lot of what it was back then to see the rise that we've had to see the teamwork, the changes, the atmosphere difference and the leadership from zak, from andrea especially, has turned things around and made us as a team the best in the world. and that's something that many people don't ever get to say”

ray

35,603 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.Naval: Marxism, besides denying human incentives, also has a problem where it just assumes that everything is finite and we're all just dividing up the same small set of things. Well, the cavemen didn't have color TVs, computers, cars, antibiotics, or medicine. They were not sitting around dividing up the same few things. The knowledge grows, and we create more. It also tends to assume that we can freeze frame at some point in society and say, 'Well, we have enough different kinds of sneakers, enough different kinds of housing, we just need to allocate it better.' And that is not how anything works. David Deutsch has a great definition of wealth, which he says is the set of physical transformations that we can affect. So, when you think about it that way, you realize that knowledge is not just stored capital in the classic Marxist sense (capital vs. labor), but it's also knowledge on what to do with that capital. The cavemen or Palaeolithic ancestors had access to all the same resources we did. They were living on the same Earth, and by the modern environmentalist arguments, they had a better Earth—they had more to do things with. But yet, they couldn't do anything. They were not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Why? Because of knowledge. Life is not a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game. But we are hardwired to think it's a zero-sum game because, for millions or billions of years, there was no such thing as wealth. There was no such thing as persistent knowledge creation in the environment. What you had was a small amount of resources being divided up, and most of the games were status games—'Which monkey outranks which other monkey?' And that decides which monkey gets to eat first. We played that game for a billion years. Now, we come onto a recent game where, actually, we can all eat, and the big problem is obesity. It's no longer starvation. The big problem is boredom. It's not actually work. There's enough work. So, in this environment, switching your evolved mindset from a zero-sum game to a positive-sum game where we can all win, if we create knowledge together and use the resources that we have to create more resources and more wealth, that's the game we all need to be playing now.
2:11

.Naval: Marxism, besides denying human incentives, also has a problem where it just assumes that everything is finite and we're all just dividing up the same small set of things. Well, the cavemen didn't have color TVs, computers, cars, antibiotics, or medicine. They were not sitting around dividing up the same few things. The knowledge grows, and we create more. It also tends to assume that we can freeze frame at some point in society and say, 'Well, we have enough different kinds of sneakers, enough different kinds of housing, we just need to allocate it better.' And that is not how anything works. David Deutsch has a great definition of wealth, which he says is the set of physical transformations that we can affect. So, when you think about it that way, you realize that knowledge is not just stored capital in the classic Marxist sense (capital vs. labor), but it's also knowledge on what to do with that capital. The cavemen or Palaeolithic ancestors had access to all the same resources we did. They were living on the same Earth, and by the modern environmentalist arguments, they had a better Earth—they had more to do things with. But yet, they couldn't do anything. They were not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Why? Because of knowledge. Life is not a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game. But we are hardwired to think it's a zero-sum game because, for millions or billions of years, there was no such thing as wealth. There was no such thing as persistent knowledge creation in the environment. What you had was a small amount of resources being divided up, and most of the games were status games—'Which monkey outranks which other monkey?' And that decides which monkey gets to eat first. We played that game for a billion years. Now, we come onto a recent game where, actually, we can all eat, and the big problem is obesity. It's no longer starvation. The big problem is boredom. It's not actually work. There's enough work. So, in this environment, switching your evolved mindset from a zero-sum game to a positive-sum game where we can all win, if we create knowledge together and use the resources that we have to create more resources and more wealth, that's the game we all need to be playing now.

Arjun Khemani

163,478 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”
1:27

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

56,915 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

German MEP Christine Anderson argues that governments "overplayed their cards" during the Covid era, setting in motion a mass awakening that can no longer be reversed. "The people stood up... And then they overplayed their cards. They came down even harder on the people to get them to do what they wanted them to do, and that woke more people up." "That was like a vicious cycle. The more people rebelled... the harder the state bashed down on them, the more people woke up." "And that's the situation we're in now. The genie is out of the bottle and they will not ever get it back in." "There is light at the end of the tunnel because a lot of people have woken up, and a lot of people will continue to wake up... in the months and years to come." "But I can tell you, buckle up. They're stepping up their game, so we have to do the same thing."
2:16

German MEP Christine Anderson argues that governments "overplayed their cards" during the Covid era, setting in motion a mass awakening that can no longer be reversed. "The people stood up... And then they overplayed their cards. They came down even harder on the people to get them to do what they wanted them to do, and that woke more people up." "That was like a vicious cycle. The more people rebelled... the harder the state bashed down on them, the more people woke up." "And that's the situation we're in now. The genie is out of the bottle and they will not ever get it back in." "There is light at the end of the tunnel because a lot of people have woken up, and a lot of people will continue to wake up... in the months and years to come." "But I can tell you, buckle up. They're stepping up their game, so we have to do the same thing."

Wide Awake Media

28,636 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.Vice President JD Vance: "I do not want so many ICE officers in Minneapolis right now... but they're here not even to enforce immigration laws, but to protect the people from the rioters. That’s an absurd state of affairs, and we wouldn't need it if we had a little bit more cooperation from the Minneapolis Police Department."
1:25

.Vice President JD Vance: "I do not want so many ICE officers in Minneapolis right now... but they're here not even to enforce immigration laws, but to protect the people from the rioters. That’s an absurd state of affairs, and we wouldn't need it if we had a little bit more cooperation from the Minneapolis Police Department."

Rapid Response 47

78,290 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"
1:44

"Every team wants to win a championship, but not every team wants to do the things required for a championship. And here's the thing: it's easy to be an average team. It doesn't require a lot. It's less adversity to be average in the world. The consequences of being average aren't easy. We end up wearing them. There's strain and struggle that comes with that too. The standard is just lower to be an average team. To be a championship team, to be champion, to be a championship team member here . . . I'm not gonna lie to you . . . I'm going to tell you the truth. It is harder. It is. The question is: Is it worth it? Some people say, "Oh it's not harder work." Yes it is. It's harder work. You can pursue comfort or you can pursue excellence. If we pursue comfort, we gotta give up some excellence. But if we pursue excellence, then we're just going to face more adversity. Everyone who's ever accomplished something excellence has had to overcome it. We are here today for a reason. Two reasons actually. Reason #1 is let's make sure that we identify and realize the opportunities that are in front of us. Reason #2 is let's make sure that we are preparing for the adversity that those opportunities require. And just understand: every single time you lever up your opportunities and you identify, "Oh there's something more I can do, more I can achieve. I can get better. I can earn more. I can do this." It's going to be matched with the adversity that comes with it. I want to make sure we are prepared for both of those, so that we're not chasing big opportunities and then getting mad when things start getting harder along the way. Is that fair? Does that make sense?"

Brian Kight

125,717 просмотров • 2 лет назад

lando about the DSQ: “from what i had to do in the race, there was already some expectation that it might happen. so it wasn't a shock, it wasn't a surprise. we knew we were having a lot more issues than we ever expected during the race and that led to already the expectation that some things might not be as we expect. maybe it would have hurt more if we won the race, but we didn't so it didn't change. it doesn't change anything. there's no point being too sad about it. of course everyone in the team was a bit gutted about the result because there's a lot of effort that goes into it. so yeah it's the same for everyone but like 0.1 millimeters or whatever, it's like a piece of paper. so it was frustrating but actually i was quite okay, just excited to go again this weekend. it doesn't change anything i want to try and win in qatar and try and win in abu dhabi. so yeah it sucks, but that's life sometimes”
1:03

lando about the DSQ: “from what i had to do in the race, there was already some expectation that it might happen. so it wasn't a shock, it wasn't a surprise. we knew we were having a lot more issues than we ever expected during the race and that led to already the expectation that some things might not be as we expect. maybe it would have hurt more if we won the race, but we didn't so it didn't change. it doesn't change anything. there's no point being too sad about it. of course everyone in the team was a bit gutted about the result because there's a lot of effort that goes into it. so yeah it's the same for everyone but like 0.1 millimeters or whatever, it's like a piece of paper. so it was frustrating but actually i was quite okay, just excited to go again this weekend. it doesn't change anything i want to try and win in qatar and try and win in abu dhabi. so yeah it sucks, but that's life sometimes”

ray

214,829 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

#Youngjae reflects on mental health, sharing how he once felt like he couldn’t run away and why he wants to remind fans that it’s okay to seek help 👤 i don’t remember exactly when, but there was a time you talked about going through something really tough in the past, was that on the radio? 🌙 yes, i talked about it a lot on the radio. and as i kept talking about it, i started getting messages about things like depression and panic disorder. and actually, because i’ve experienced it myself, i feel like there’s something i can say to people going through it. the truth is, i couldn’t run away. 👤 right 🌙 i couldn’t run away. for me, running away would’ve made things worse. i was in a situation where i couldn’t run away, and even if i did, i’d end up being dragged back. that's how it was for me. but looking back now, i want to tell them it’s really okay. that it would’ve been okay to run away. and because i’ve expressed my struggles through my lyrics and shared them openly, i don’t think there’s anything shameful about it. in the past, when you say you’re going to a psychiatrist, well, things have changed a lot these days. these days, people say, “if you’re struggling, you should go get help,” but back then, it felt like you had to hide it. like it meant you had some kind of serious illness. that was the general perception at the time. that's why people ended up keeping it to themselves. but there’s no need to do that at all. there’s no need to be ashamed. this is something anyone might go through at some point in life. so i told those people not to think that way. 👤 i feel like doing radio helped you develop more empathy. 🌙 that’s true 👤 even though you’ve grown distant from me, it feels like you’ve gotten closer to the rest of the country 🌙 i think chinchin might have done something wrong 👤 weren’t we kind of close? 🌙 i think chinchin made a mistake. anyway, developing that empathy made me want to talk about these things more. because from a listener’s point of view, they might just see me as a celebrity. but i didn’t want to be seen that way. people often use the word “public figure,” but i’m not one. i don’t get paid by the government, so i’m not a public figure. i just happen to have a job like anyone else. 👤 you’re just someone who is more well-known. 🌙 yeah, just someone who works in the public eye, but i’m no different from anyone else. that’s what i really wanted to say. 👤 but even though you want to say that and you do believe it, there’s that feeling, right? like, “even if i keep saying this, will people really see me as the same?” 🌙 that’s true 👤 and that thought can feel frustrating 🌙 that’s why i talk about it even more. i do the same things too. like, i lie down on the floor before i go take a shower, and an hour or two passes, and i go, “ya, i need to shower now.” it's the same. our life is just the same. we’re all just specks of dust in the universe. we're really all the same. i guess i just want to feel closer to people.
3:25

#Youngjae reflects on mental health, sharing how he once felt like he couldn’t run away and why he wants to remind fans that it’s okay to seek help 👤 i don’t remember exactly when, but there was a time you talked about going through something really tough in the past, was that on the radio? 🌙 yes, i talked about it a lot on the radio. and as i kept talking about it, i started getting messages about things like depression and panic disorder. and actually, because i’ve experienced it myself, i feel like there’s something i can say to people going through it. the truth is, i couldn’t run away. 👤 right 🌙 i couldn’t run away. for me, running away would’ve made things worse. i was in a situation where i couldn’t run away, and even if i did, i’d end up being dragged back. that's how it was for me. but looking back now, i want to tell them it’s really okay. that it would’ve been okay to run away. and because i’ve expressed my struggles through my lyrics and shared them openly, i don’t think there’s anything shameful about it. in the past, when you say you’re going to a psychiatrist, well, things have changed a lot these days. these days, people say, “if you’re struggling, you should go get help,” but back then, it felt like you had to hide it. like it meant you had some kind of serious illness. that was the general perception at the time. that's why people ended up keeping it to themselves. but there’s no need to do that at all. there’s no need to be ashamed. this is something anyone might go through at some point in life. so i told those people not to think that way. 👤 i feel like doing radio helped you develop more empathy. 🌙 that’s true 👤 even though you’ve grown distant from me, it feels like you’ve gotten closer to the rest of the country 🌙 i think chinchin might have done something wrong 👤 weren’t we kind of close? 🌙 i think chinchin made a mistake. anyway, developing that empathy made me want to talk about these things more. because from a listener’s point of view, they might just see me as a celebrity. but i didn’t want to be seen that way. people often use the word “public figure,” but i’m not one. i don’t get paid by the government, so i’m not a public figure. i just happen to have a job like anyone else. 👤 you’re just someone who is more well-known. 🌙 yeah, just someone who works in the public eye, but i’m no different from anyone else. that’s what i really wanted to say. 👤 but even though you want to say that and you do believe it, there’s that feeling, right? like, “even if i keep saying this, will people really see me as the same?” 🌙 that’s true 👤 and that thought can feel frustrating 🌙 that’s why i talk about it even more. i do the same things too. like, i lie down on the floor before i go take a shower, and an hour or two passes, and i go, “ya, i need to shower now.” it's the same. our life is just the same. we’re all just specks of dust in the universe. we're really all the same. i guess i just want to feel closer to people.

𝐣𝐨𝐲𝐜𝐞

13,366 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Elon at Davos: "SpaceX, within a few years, will be launching solar-powered AI satellites." Last week, early SpaceX engineer Scott Nolan explained the logic behind Elon's solar AI vision: "Solar obviously takes a lot more area on the ground, but there is plenty of area for that in general. The missing piece was really storage." "Solar is inherently cyclical. To smooth it out, you need very cheap grid-scale or at least gigawatt-scale storage. Batteries or other forms. We haven't had that yet at a cost point that I think can compete with nuclear. That could change, and that would be great. But for now, in the foreseeable future on Earth, it's nuclear." "Now, when we talk about in-orbit, it's a whole different ballgame. If you have very cheap launch capacity, if your GPUs don't weigh very much, which they don't, and they're high-value, you could potentially put all of that in orbit, have your solar panel completely in sun-sync, and solve the battery issue. The one remaining piece is — you've got a lot of incident solar energy, and you're going to run those GPUs, how do you cool them? I think that's the piece that people are going to be working on for the next few years."
2:26

Elon at Davos: "SpaceX, within a few years, will be launching solar-powered AI satellites." Last week, early SpaceX engineer Scott Nolan explained the logic behind Elon's solar AI vision: "Solar obviously takes a lot more area on the ground, but there is plenty of area for that in general. The missing piece was really storage." "Solar is inherently cyclical. To smooth it out, you need very cheap grid-scale or at least gigawatt-scale storage. Batteries or other forms. We haven't had that yet at a cost point that I think can compete with nuclear. That could change, and that would be great. But for now, in the foreseeable future on Earth, it's nuclear." "Now, when we talk about in-orbit, it's a whole different ballgame. If you have very cheap launch capacity, if your GPUs don't weigh very much, which they don't, and they're high-value, you could potentially put all of that in orbit, have your solar panel completely in sun-sync, and solve the battery issue. The one remaining piece is — you've got a lot of incident solar energy, and you're going to run those GPUs, how do you cool them? I think that's the piece that people are going to be working on for the next few years."

TBPN

21,239 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад