Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Someone counted that Chenxiu changes into a total of 32 different outfits in just ONE PV 😯 CR.来碗糟粕醋吗 #Ananta #無限大Ananta #Chenxiu

Infinite Ananta

4,274 subscribers

12,861 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

#Ananta #無限大Ananta #Chenxiu

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

When George Michael Changed One Note… and It Hit Different🎵 In a room full of legends, George Michael made one of the most powerful changes in Do They Know It’s Christmas and he did it with just a single note. While the line “But say a prayer” was meant to be flat and throwaway, George instinctively lifted the word “but”, turning it into something real. Something human. This wasn’t showmanship, it was soul. A tiny melodic shift that added weight, pain, and quiet compassion. This is the story of how one subtle decision in a rehearsal showed the true heart of George Michael.

When George Michael Changed One Note… and It Hit Different🎵 In a room full of legends, George Michael made one of the most powerful changes in Do They Know It’s Christmas and he did it with just a single note. While the line “But say a prayer” was meant to be flat and throwaway, George instinctively lifted the word “but”, turning it into something real. Something human. This wasn’t showmanship, it was soul. A tiny melodic shift that added weight, pain, and quiet compassion. This is the story of how one subtle decision in a rehearsal showed the true heart of George Michael.

𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 - 𝐌𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐞 - 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐞⭐️❤️

128,760 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | Raisina Dialogue 2026 | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "... When we look back at these 70 years, I think the expectation that we can freeze a 1945 or a 1989 forever was a very unrealistic one. In fact, look back at the 70 years. These 70 years, we debate, how did we do, why didn't it last, 70 years is 1% of Indian history. Why would 1% of Indian history last? Life moves on. I think this attachment to the past did not take into account the forces that were propelling the change... If there are going to be two big changes in this decade, one will be technology, but the other will be demographic... A lot of the analysis is obviously centred around the changes in America... My sense is you're going to have a future which will really be much more multipolar because no country today has hegemony over so many domains that it is an overall hegemon. It's not just a distribution of GDP and capabilities. I think in different domains, different parts of the world will contribute more or will have more capabilities. So the power in its different dimensions has spread out much more..."

#WATCH | Raisina Dialogue 2026 | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "... When we look back at these 70 years, I think the expectation that we can freeze a 1945 or a 1989 forever was a very unrealistic one. In fact, look back at the 70 years. These 70 years, we debate, how did we do, why didn't it last, 70 years is 1% of Indian history. Why would 1% of Indian history last? Life moves on. I think this attachment to the past did not take into account the forces that were propelling the change... If there are going to be two big changes in this decade, one will be technology, but the other will be demographic... A lot of the analysis is obviously centred around the changes in America... My sense is you're going to have a future which will really be much more multipolar because no country today has hegemony over so many domains that it is an overall hegemon. It's not just a distribution of GDP and capabilities. I think in different domains, different parts of the world will contribute more or will have more capabilities. So the power in its different dimensions has spread out much more..."

ANI

42,615 views • 4 months ago

SOMEONE JUST PUBLISHED 10 FREE RULES THAT TURN A $20/MONTH SUBSCRIPTION INTO A $15,000/MONTH TEAM 90% of users type like they're googling, they get generic answers and assume that’s the limit of what’s possible Rule 1 alone changes everything, just add a job title before every task: "You are a professional resume writer who helped 500+ people land jobs at Google, Amazon, and McKinsey" The same prompt produces a resume that gets interviews instead of one that fills a template A 3-hour research project becomes 15 minutes, learning Python goes from 6 months to 30 days with a custom roadmap, and a resume gets written in 10 min 8 focused prompts in one conversation produce work that looks like it took days But it takes 30 min, freelancers who know these rules charge $150-200/hour for prompt engineering the 10 rules + 20 copy-paste prompts are free in the article below

SOMEONE JUST PUBLISHED 10 FREE RULES THAT TURN A $20/MONTH SUBSCRIPTION INTO A $15,000/MONTH TEAM 90% of users type like they're googling, they get generic answers and assume that’s the limit of what’s possible Rule 1 alone changes everything, just add a job title before every task: "You are a professional resume writer who helped 500+ people land jobs at Google, Amazon, and McKinsey" The same prompt produces a resume that gets interviews instead of one that fills a template A 3-hour research project becomes 15 minutes, learning Python goes from 6 months to 30 days with a custom roadmap, and a resume gets written in 10 min 8 focused prompts in one conversation produce work that looks like it took days But it takes 30 min, freelancers who know these rules charge $150-200/hour for prompt engineering the 10 rules + 20 copy-paste prompts are free in the article below

Chrome

12,207 views • 2 months ago

Will Ferrell says the iconic Anchorman news team fight was his favorite scene to film, revealing it was shot in 100-degree heat in just one day and captured the absurd comedy that defined the movie. “One of my favorite scenes in the movie. It’s such an incredible joke bag. Before we get into the fight, Brick Tamland, played by Steve Carell, is holding a grenade. We don’t know how he got ahold of it. There is a man on fire, there is someone being dragged by a net by horseback, which is kind of an homage to early Planet of the Apes.” “I think it’s something like 30 to 35 different setups, with two units, a stunt unit working at the same time as the main film unit in downtown LA in the middle of July. And I think it was 100 degrees that day.” “And we only had the one day to complete all that. And it’s probably a scene that should have taken three days to shoot. So silly, so absurdist. I think it is really one of the touchstone moments that defines the tone of Anchorman.” “I think Adam and I wanted to create this film where we got to indulge every comedy idea we ever had and follow it all the way through without someone telling us, “No, that scene’s too long,” “No one would ever do that,” “That doesn’t make sense.” We just wanted it to be like, it may not make sense, but it’s just funny.” “I think when people saw that film, they were like, “This feels like someone gave you the keys to a car and you’re 5 years old and you don’t know how to drive.” No one wanted to make it, no one understood why this would be funny. We just felt like we were playing with the house’s money, and let’s just make the craziest film we can, because we may never be allowed to make another movie ever again.”

Will Ferrell says the iconic Anchorman news team fight was his favorite scene to film, revealing it was shot in 100-degree heat in just one day and captured the absurd comedy that defined the movie. “One of my favorite scenes in the movie. It’s such an incredible joke bag. Before we get into the fight, Brick Tamland, played by Steve Carell, is holding a grenade. We don’t know how he got ahold of it. There is a man on fire, there is someone being dragged by a net by horseback, which is kind of an homage to early Planet of the Apes.” “I think it’s something like 30 to 35 different setups, with two units, a stunt unit working at the same time as the main film unit in downtown LA in the middle of July. And I think it was 100 degrees that day.” “And we only had the one day to complete all that. And it’s probably a scene that should have taken three days to shoot. So silly, so absurdist. I think it is really one of the touchstone moments that defines the tone of Anchorman.” “I think Adam and I wanted to create this film where we got to indulge every comedy idea we ever had and follow it all the way through without someone telling us, “No, that scene’s too long,” “No one would ever do that,” “That doesn’t make sense.” We just wanted it to be like, it may not make sense, but it’s just funny.” “I think when people saw that film, they were like, “This feels like someone gave you the keys to a car and you’re 5 years old and you don’t know how to drive.” No one wanted to make it, no one understood why this would be funny. We just felt like we were playing with the house’s money, and let’s just make the craziest film we can, because we may never be allowed to make another movie ever again.”

Ruzy.hl

59,943 views • 8 days ago

The Science of Chanting: Why 32 Lakh Times for the Gayatri Mantra? Have you ever wondered why there is a specific count for mantra chanting in our traditions? It is not just a random number; it is a deep spiritual science based on the structure of the mantra itself. In this video, the significance of the Gayatri Mantra and its "Purushcharana" (the process of mastering a mantra) is explained through simple spiritual mathematics. The Math Behind the Mantra: - The 24 Varnas: The basic Gayatri Mantra consists of 24 syllables or letters, known as varnas. - The 24 Lakh Goal: According to Mantra Shastra, to initiate or "awaken" a mantra, one must chant it as many lakh times as there are syllables. Therefore, the basic practice requires 24 lakh chants, which a dedicated seeker can usually complete in about 2 years. The Vishvamitra Tradition: The count changes when we follow the method used by Brahmarishi Vishvamitra, which includes the Vyahritis. - Adding the Vyahritis: By adding Om and the three Vyahritis (Bhur, Bhuvah, Svah), the total count of syllables increases. - The 32 Lakh Sankalp: These additions bring the total to 32 syllables (24 + 8 = 32). To complete the full Purushcharana of this version, one must perform 32 lakh chants. This tradition shows us that every sound has weight and every chant brings us closer to spiritual awakening. It is a journey of discipline, patience, and pure devotion. Jai Maa Gayatri! If you found this insight helpful, save this post for your spiritual journey and share it with others!

The Science of Chanting: Why 32 Lakh Times for the Gayatri Mantra? Have you ever wondered why there is a specific count for mantra chanting in our traditions? It is not just a random number; it is a deep spiritual science based on the structure of the mantra itself. In this video, the significance of the Gayatri Mantra and its "Purushcharana" (the process of mastering a mantra) is explained through simple spiritual mathematics. The Math Behind the Mantra: - The 24 Varnas: The basic Gayatri Mantra consists of 24 syllables or letters, known as varnas. - The 24 Lakh Goal: According to Mantra Shastra, to initiate or "awaken" a mantra, one must chant it as many lakh times as there are syllables. Therefore, the basic practice requires 24 lakh chants, which a dedicated seeker can usually complete in about 2 years. The Vishvamitra Tradition: The count changes when we follow the method used by Brahmarishi Vishvamitra, which includes the Vyahritis. - Adding the Vyahritis: By adding Om and the three Vyahritis (Bhur, Bhuvah, Svah), the total count of syllables increases. - The 32 Lakh Sankalp: These additions bring the total to 32 syllables (24 + 8 = 32). To complete the full Purushcharana of this version, one must perform 32 lakh chants. This tradition shows us that every sound has weight and every chant brings us closer to spiritual awakening. It is a journey of discipline, patience, and pure devotion. Jai Maa Gayatri! If you found this insight helpful, save this post for your spiritual journey and share it with others!

Arpit

23,314 views • 7 months ago

Jeff Jarrett just dropped a MASSIVE take on the state of the industry, and it’s going to ruffle some feathers. While the internet wrestling community is busy debating the merits of Triple H’s creative or Tony Khan’s massive roster depth, Double J is pointing out the glaring OMISSION in today’s product: The LOST ART of booking for HEAT. Jarrett didn't shy away from the Jim Cornette conversation. He admits that while the business has evolved into a completely different beast....with streaming, no house shows, and a total shift in metrics; the fundamental truth remains: HEELS DRAW MONEY. Is the industry ignoring the one thing that actually puts butts in seats? Jarrett suggests that if you book for heat, you WILL get the payoff, citing MJF as a rare example of someone who actually understands this concept in the modern era. Are we watching a product that has abandoned the most important rule in professional wrestling? Or is the "Cornette style" of booking officially an ARCHAIC relic that has no place in 2026? SOUND OFF IN THE COMMENTS. 👇 (source: My World With Jeff Jarrett My World with Jeff Jarrett)

Jeff Jarrett just dropped a MASSIVE take on the state of the industry, and it’s going to ruffle some feathers. While the internet wrestling community is busy debating the merits of Triple H’s creative or Tony Khan’s massive roster depth, Double J is pointing out the glaring OMISSION in today’s product: The LOST ART of booking for HEAT. Jarrett didn't shy away from the Jim Cornette conversation. He admits that while the business has evolved into a completely different beast....with streaming, no house shows, and a total shift in metrics; the fundamental truth remains: HEELS DRAW MONEY. Is the industry ignoring the one thing that actually puts butts in seats? Jarrett suggests that if you book for heat, you WILL get the payoff, citing MJF as a rare example of someone who actually understands this concept in the modern era. Are we watching a product that has abandoned the most important rule in professional wrestling? Or is the "Cornette style" of booking officially an ARCHAIC relic that has no place in 2026? SOUND OFF IN THE COMMENTS. 👇 (source: My World With Jeff Jarrett My World with Jeff Jarrett)

RingsideFeed

20,007 views • 2 months ago

🚨 THERE’S NO VIDEO OF TYLER ROBINSON TURNING HIMSELF IN - AND NOBODY CAN EXPLAIN WHY A review of public records just exposed something bizarre in the Charlie Kirk case: There is zero surveillance footage of Tyler Robinson entering the sheriff’s office when he turned himself in. Not one clip. Every request for that footage came back with a different answer - some denied, some saying nothing exists in the system, and one reply claiming it may have already been deleted under a 30-day purge. So what actually happened? Was the footage ever saved? Was it erased? Was it passed to another agency? Or did it never exist to begin with? For a case this high-profile, the suspect’s arrival should be the simplest piece of evidence to produce. Instead, it’s a black hole. How does the most basic piece of evidence in a national case just evaporate? A suspect in a high-profile homicide doesn’t walk into a sheriff’s building unrecorded. Unless someone made sure it stayed that way. Is the footage missing by accident…or missing on purpose?

HustleBitch

100,271 views • 8 months ago

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

The Pragmatic Engineer

39,011 views • 2 months ago

What you're looking at started as something that most people drive past without a second thought. - Industrial - boring - overlooked And someone looked at it and saw something no one else was seeing. That's the whole game here. You don't have to invent something brand new to make serious money. You just have to see potential where everyone else sees limitations. You have to look at what already exists and imagine it just a little differently. So when you turn something familiar into something unexpected, it becomes shareable and memorable. It becomes the thing that people can't stop talking about because it's different in a world where everything feels the same. People will literally travel hours just to stay somewhere like this because different is the experience now. Nobody cares about another cookie cutter hotel room that they've seen a thousand times, but this gets filmed and posted and sent to friends with the caption "you have to see this place" And suddenly you're booked out months in advance because you gave something people can't get anywhere else. I love that the raw materials here aren't special, it's just space that was sitting there unused and cheap to acquire The success of this is found in the willingness to look at what everyone else ignored and ask "what could this become?" Instead of just accepting what currently is. That's where the opportunity is. There are thousands of: - shipping containers rotting in fields - old grain silos sitting empty - warehouses no one's using - barns that haven't been touched in decades And every single one of them could become something people would pay to experience if someone just had the vision to see it through. You don't need to build it from scratch. You just need to reimagine what's already sitting in front of you. Because the world is full of overlooked things waiting for someone to look at them differently. And I don't care if AI generated the video because the inspiration you get from it is still the same.

Chris Koerner

18,208 views • 5 months ago

“One of the best conferences I’ve ever been to.” That’s how Aubrey Strobel described the Eve Wealth Summit. Aubrey is a leading voice in Bitcoin and financial empowerment and someone who has been helping bring more women into this space for years. What stood out most wasn’t just the setting, it was the quality of conversation, the relationships built, and the real outcomes that came from it. As our Co-founder Elaine Asher (elaineasher.eth) shared, Eve was created to build a different kind of room, one where women can connect, collaborate, and actually do business together. We’re so excited to have Aubrey Strobel back with us this year! April 20–22 · Arizona Biltmore Get your ticket now🎟

“One of the best conferences I’ve ever been to.” That’s how Aubrey Strobel described the Eve Wealth Summit. Aubrey is a leading voice in Bitcoin and financial empowerment and someone who has been helping bring more women into this space for years. What stood out most wasn’t just the setting, it was the quality of conversation, the relationships built, and the real outcomes that came from it. As our Co-founder Elaine Asher (elaineasher.eth) shared, Eve was created to build a different kind of room, one where women can connect, collaborate, and actually do business together. We’re so excited to have Aubrey Strobel back with us this year! April 20–22 · Arizona Biltmore Get your ticket now🎟

evewealthhq

56,728 views • 4 months ago

“The world will see Jews living in peace under a Muslim just like they did in Palestine before the Zionists came. And then they will understand that it’s Zionism that is the problem” A Jewish voter and rabbi in Queens reacts to Zohran Mamdani’s win. This election cycle saw millions of dollars poured into fear messaging — claiming Mamdani was “dangerous,” “anti-Jewish,” or that criticizing Israeli state policies is the same as antisemitism. But Tuesday’s results showed a different reality on the ground. Mamdani not only won — he won 32% of the Jewish vote in one of the largest Jewish population centers outside Israel. This moment is reshaping a core narrative in US politics: Jewish voters are not a monolith. Many refuse to let their identity be used to justify apartheid, siege, or genocide — and are choosing local leadership based on material policies and shared values, not lobby talking points. Video credit: SNEAKO

“The world will see Jews living in peace under a Muslim just like they did in Palestine before the Zionists came. And then they will understand that it’s Zionism that is the problem” A Jewish voter and rabbi in Queens reacts to Zohran Mamdani’s win. This election cycle saw millions of dollars poured into fear messaging — claiming Mamdani was “dangerous,” “anti-Jewish,” or that criticizing Israeli state policies is the same as antisemitism. But Tuesday’s results showed a different reality on the ground. Mamdani not only won — he won 32% of the Jewish vote in one of the largest Jewish population centers outside Israel. This moment is reshaping a core narrative in US politics: Jewish voters are not a monolith. Many refuse to let their identity be used to justify apartheid, siege, or genocide — and are choosing local leadership based on material policies and shared values, not lobby talking points. Video credit: SNEAKO

MintPress News

14,898 views • 8 months ago

At a local childcare center in Sarasota, parents began noticing something different at pickup time. The children were unusually quiet, no excited stories, no laughter, just tense little faces. One afternoon, a parent arrived early and overheard the woman in charge loudly scolding the entire group. Her tone was sharp, her words harsh, and the children stood frozen, some fighting back tears. It wasn’t a safety issue in that moment, it was the atmosphere. The room felt heavy. Fear instead of guidance. Structure is important in childcare. But so is emotional safety. Kids may forget a lesso. Theyy rarely forget how someone made them feel. When does discipline cross the line into intimidation, especially in a place meant to nurture young minds?

At a local childcare center in Sarasota, parents began noticing something different at pickup time. The children were unusually quiet, no excited stories, no laughter, just tense little faces. One afternoon, a parent arrived early and overheard the woman in charge loudly scolding the entire group. Her tone was sharp, her words harsh, and the children stood frozen, some fighting back tears. It wasn’t a safety issue in that moment, it was the atmosphere. The room felt heavy. Fear instead of guidance. Structure is important in childcare. But so is emotional safety. Kids may forget a lesso. Theyy rarely forget how someone made them feel. When does discipline cross the line into intimidation, especially in a place meant to nurture young minds?

Dr.L

339,203 views • 5 months ago

How much it cost to have a baby in America (Tennessee) - Ultrasound “cost us $2,067.85” - Hospital stay observation room $413.65 - The recovery room cost us $2,702.45 - “A hospital stay, I don't know how that's different, but that one cost us $4,438 - The emergency room cost us $1,932.90 - Laboratory, that cost us an additional $1,439.20 - Then we go into labor and delivery — we got charged $10,593.40 - Then our anesthesia. So my epidural cost us more than anything else. That one was $14,446.15 - Pharmacy cost $3,007.25 - “Supplies cost $565.03” So the grand total for everything came out to $33,011.73. But that was just for our stay. We also had to pay for Aspen, our newborn daughter, to be in the hospital. - her hospital stay to stay with us in the room that we also paid for was $4,008 Our complete hospital bill cost $37,019.73 “Was it worth it? Yes. — Yes. It was worth every penny, but she was an expensive baby. It's a lot of money.”

How much it cost to have a baby in America (Tennessee) - Ultrasound “cost us $2,067.85” - Hospital stay observation room $413.65 - The recovery room cost us $2,702.45 - “A hospital stay, I don't know how that's different, but that one cost us $4,438 - The emergency room cost us $1,932.90 - Laboratory, that cost us an additional $1,439.20 - Then we go into labor and delivery — we got charged $10,593.40 - Then our anesthesia. So my epidural cost us more than anything else. That one was $14,446.15 - Pharmacy cost $3,007.25 - “Supplies cost $565.03” So the grand total for everything came out to $33,011.73. But that was just for our stay. We also had to pay for Aspen, our newborn daughter, to be in the hospital. - her hospital stay to stay with us in the room that we also paid for was $4,008 Our complete hospital bill cost $37,019.73 “Was it worth it? Yes. — Yes. It was worth every penny, but she was an expensive baby. It's a lot of money.”

Wall Street Apes

2,446,823 views • 1 year ago

The Cameras ✨ Back in February I started exploring the idea of creating an art collection that doubles up as a PFP. After months of experimenting with different colour theories, art styles and AI, The Cameras are finished and ready for you to make a choice. Here’s all the info: The Cameras are built on a brand new dynamic Transient Labs contract called Collectors Choice. It works in a very similar way to now @amadon’s Doppelgänger. Each NFT points to one of multiple artworks in an array, and the collector can use the ‘ChangeURI’ function within the contract, to point to whichever artwork within the array they choose. But here’s the difference; there will be a deadline. Make as many changes as you wish, but once the deadline passes, your choice will be locked in and metadata will be frozen. To start, everyone will mint the same placeholder artwork. I will then reveal the 'Colour Series'; 70 cameras with various background colours, to choose which ever colour you want. Following that, 4 more series will be revealed sporadically, making up a total of 126 different cameras to choose from. Meaning, there’s more then enough for everyone to end up with a 1/1. However, chances are, someone will choose the same camera as you. You’ll then have a second decision to make, are you happy sharing the art and holding an edition, or will you choose different art for a 1/1? For me, once all the metadata is locked in, rarity won’t really matter. But the total number of cameras in each series, total number of 1/1s, total number of editions and total count of each edition, will all be decided by the collectors. Get ready to make your choice. - Mint Details: • Supply: 70 • Mint Price: 0.35 eth • 48hr Pre-Sale Mint: Aug 14th (7pm UTC) Collectors of 0xdgb’s 1/1 art + a few select people will get early access for 48 hours. • Public Mint: Aug 16th (7pm UTC) - Mint URL, series reveals, the deadline and instructions on how to choose your camera will be announced when needed.

dgb

45,569 views • 3 years ago

JONATHAN TURLEY ON DOGE: THE TERROR ALERT IN WASHINGTON IS QUITE ASTONISHING “You have people all over the Beltway breathing in paper bags right now because of the idea that they could bring in these people, and that they're going to think outside the box. That's what Musk is known for. He's known as someone who rejects path dependence. He did that with Twitter. You know, they said he couldn't fire all those people at Twitter. Twitter became more efficient, and the operations continued unimpeded. That was against all the predictions that Twitter would literally shut down because it needed every one of those or most of those employees. So, Musk is coming in here, and yeah, the terror alert in Washington is quite astonishing. But this idea that this is a danger to democracy is rather odd. You have a president who just ran on a pledge to shrink the government, to look for waste. He brought in someone from the outside for a reason, because past pledges by presidents have gone nowhere in terms of changing the way Washington functions. So, he brought in this guy who operates with a different approach. The truth is, they want people to leave some of these positions. The fact is that if you throw a badger into a crowded car, people are going to get out. And Musk is that badger. [Trump] threw him in that car, and they're trying to change the way government is composed and is running.” Source: Fox News, February 6, 2025

JONATHAN TURLEY ON DOGE: THE TERROR ALERT IN WASHINGTON IS QUITE ASTONISHING “You have people all over the Beltway breathing in paper bags right now because of the idea that they could bring in these people, and that they're going to think outside the box. That's what Musk is known for. He's known as someone who rejects path dependence. He did that with Twitter. You know, they said he couldn't fire all those people at Twitter. Twitter became more efficient, and the operations continued unimpeded. That was against all the predictions that Twitter would literally shut down because it needed every one of those or most of those employees. So, Musk is coming in here, and yeah, the terror alert in Washington is quite astonishing. But this idea that this is a danger to democracy is rather odd. You have a president who just ran on a pledge to shrink the government, to look for waste. He brought in someone from the outside for a reason, because past pledges by presidents have gone nowhere in terms of changing the way Washington functions. So, he brought in this guy who operates with a different approach. The truth is, they want people to leave some of these positions. The fact is that if you throw a badger into a crowded car, people are going to get out. And Musk is that badger. [Trump] threw him in that car, and they're trying to change the way government is composed and is running.” Source: Fox News, February 6, 2025

Mario Nawfal

4,492,066 views • 1 year ago

Larry Fink just told you what he is building. Fink: “All investments on a tokenized platform… We have one common blockchain.” Not some investments. All of them. Every stock. Every bond. Every acre of land. Every barrel of oil. On one ledger. Controlled by whoever writes the rules of that ledger. That is not a financial product. That is a $300 trillion architecture with one set of keys. Tucker Carlson: “It’s not about their nukes?” Catherine Austin Fitts: “No. Iran Central Bank counts. If you’re gonna come out with programmable money, with digital IDs that are interoperable globally… you can’t afford leakage. Iran right now is the big leakage.” The conflict with Iran is not about weapons. It is not about ideology. It is about one central bank that has not plugged into the system. A nation becomes a threat the moment it refuses to connect. Not a military threat. A structural one. Because one country operating outside programmable money is proof that the exit works. That proof cannot exist. So it gets removed. Now understand what programmable money actually means. Physical cash has no conditions. You hold it. You spend it. No one reaches inside your wallet and switches the bills off. Programmable money is different in one specific way. It can be turned off. Not stolen. Not seized. Not taxed through courts. Switched off. Your balance stays the same. The number does not change. It just stops working. For you. At the time and place of someone else’s choosing. Fitts is not theorizing about a future system. She is describing the architecture being built right now. When your money is programmable, your behavior becomes a variable in someone else’s equation. Your political donations. Your travel. Your purchases. All of it readable. All of it actionable. Not by law. By code. Laws require courts. Courts require time. Code requires nothing. One flag. You can no longer transact. No judge. No jury. No appeal. No sound. Fink is not hiding this. Fitts is not speculating. They are describing the destination. The people who hold physical assets. Who diversify across jurisdictions. Who refuse to convert everything into a token on someone else’s ledger. They are not paranoid. They are already outside the cage. When $300 trillion moves onto one blockchain, under one set of rules, written by the people who control that chain, the word for that is not innovation. The word for that is capture. The door does not slam shut. It locks.

Larry Fink just told you what he is building. Fink: “All investments on a tokenized platform… We have one common blockchain.” Not some investments. All of them. Every stock. Every bond. Every acre of land. Every barrel of oil. On one ledger. Controlled by whoever writes the rules of that ledger. That is not a financial product. That is a $300 trillion architecture with one set of keys. Tucker Carlson: “It’s not about their nukes?” Catherine Austin Fitts: “No. Iran Central Bank counts. If you’re gonna come out with programmable money, with digital IDs that are interoperable globally… you can’t afford leakage. Iran right now is the big leakage.” The conflict with Iran is not about weapons. It is not about ideology. It is about one central bank that has not plugged into the system. A nation becomes a threat the moment it refuses to connect. Not a military threat. A structural one. Because one country operating outside programmable money is proof that the exit works. That proof cannot exist. So it gets removed. Now understand what programmable money actually means. Physical cash has no conditions. You hold it. You spend it. No one reaches inside your wallet and switches the bills off. Programmable money is different in one specific way. It can be turned off. Not stolen. Not seized. Not taxed through courts. Switched off. Your balance stays the same. The number does not change. It just stops working. For you. At the time and place of someone else’s choosing. Fitts is not theorizing about a future system. She is describing the architecture being built right now. When your money is programmable, your behavior becomes a variable in someone else’s equation. Your political donations. Your travel. Your purchases. All of it readable. All of it actionable. Not by law. By code. Laws require courts. Courts require time. Code requires nothing. One flag. You can no longer transact. No judge. No jury. No appeal. No sound. Fink is not hiding this. Fitts is not speculating. They are describing the destination. The people who hold physical assets. Who diversify across jurisdictions. Who refuse to convert everything into a token on someone else’s ledger. They are not paranoid. They are already outside the cage. When $300 trillion moves onto one blockchain, under one set of rules, written by the people who control that chain, the word for that is not innovation. The word for that is capture. The door does not slam shut. It locks.

Dustin

45,308 views • 3 months ago

Forty straight days, one NASA spacecraft refused to blink.Out in the cold between Earth and the Sun, the four little PUNCH satellites locked their cameras on Comet SWAN as it streaked past Mars, its turquoise tail flickering like a broken neon sign while solar wind tore it apart in real time. Every four minutes: click. Forty days of relentless frames turned the comet’s death dance into the most hypnotic timelapse humanity has ever filmed.Then, right at the grand finale, something uninvited barged into the shot.A rogue from another star entirely (3I/ATLAS), the third confirmed interstellar object ever seen, came screaming across the frame from left to right, moving so fast it looked like someone had fast-forwarded just that one corner of the sky. Born billions of years ago around a sun that no longer exists, this alien snowball photobombed our comet with perfect cosmic arrogance, trailing weird sulfur and water ice that have never belonged to our system.Two wanderers, two different origin stories, caught in the same lens at the same moment: one dying beautifully on its first and only trip around our Sun, the other just passing through, already late for whatever comes after the Milky Way.The universe, ladies and gentlemen, has a flair for dramatic entrances and exits.

Forty straight days, one NASA spacecraft refused to blink.Out in the cold between Earth and the Sun, the four little PUNCH satellites locked their cameras on Comet SWAN as it streaked past Mars, its turquoise tail flickering like a broken neon sign while solar wind tore it apart in real time. Every four minutes: click. Forty days of relentless frames turned the comet’s death dance into the most hypnotic timelapse humanity has ever filmed.Then, right at the grand finale, something uninvited barged into the shot.A rogue from another star entirely (3I/ATLAS), the third confirmed interstellar object ever seen, came screaming across the frame from left to right, moving so fast it looked like someone had fast-forwarded just that one corner of the sky. Born billions of years ago around a sun that no longer exists, this alien snowball photobombed our comet with perfect cosmic arrogance, trailing weird sulfur and water ice that have never belonged to our system.Two wanderers, two different origin stories, caught in the same lens at the same moment: one dying beautifully on its first and only trip around our Sun, the other just passing through, already late for whatever comes after the Milky Way.The universe, ladies and gentlemen, has a flair for dramatic entrances and exits.

Black Hole

112,301 views • 7 months ago

Sincerity answered with sincerity. 🥰 No one imagined that Orm had gone to pray to the Buddha just for a chance to act in TSOU with LingLing. Even though the odds were slim she stayed devoted to her own heart. Normally people pray for romance hoping to meet the right person in their life, but for Orm it was different. From the very first meeting with Ling she already knew. Her prayer was never vague. If it was not P’Ling then it could not be anyone else. Later when success finally came this secret stayed hidden until Orm revealed it herself. She even performed a dance of gratitude for a wish that once felt almost impossible to come true. One meeting turned into years of quiet longing. A young girl just stepping into adulthood met someone she loved at first sight. No one loves someone for that long when they only get to see her twice a year, no one goes out of their way to support her by visiting her younger brother’s restaurant even when it is completely out of the way and Ling never even knew. No one remembers what the other person wore or the color of their clothes at the first meeting and still remembers it perfectly years later unless they truly kept it in their heart, no one keeps a photo from a shared acting class for that many years without deep feelings. 😭 All of this makes you wonder if anyone other than Orm Kornnaphat could be this sincere. By the timeline it was five years. Five years of unspoken love and quiet devotion. And now that effort has finally been rewarded Orm. I think Orm did not just pray to be cast in TSOU with Ling. She also wished to be the one standing beside her and especially to be able to kiss her first love. Just look at the TSOU casting moment between the two of them. Orm practically pecked Ling like a little chick 🐥 LingOrm are truly equally crazy in love. I used to think Ling was already the ultimate love saint from Hong Kong. Turns out Orm has taken the crown instead, the love saint of Thailand. Orm Kornnaphat: this is the one I prayed for 💖 #หลิงออม #LingOrm #หลิงหลิงคอง #Linglingkwong #ออมกรณ์นภัส #Ormkornnaphat

Sincerity answered with sincerity. 🥰 No one imagined that Orm had gone to pray to the Buddha just for a chance to act in TSOU with LingLing. Even though the odds were slim she stayed devoted to her own heart. Normally people pray for romance hoping to meet the right person in their life, but for Orm it was different. From the very first meeting with Ling she already knew. Her prayer was never vague. If it was not P’Ling then it could not be anyone else. Later when success finally came this secret stayed hidden until Orm revealed it herself. She even performed a dance of gratitude for a wish that once felt almost impossible to come true. One meeting turned into years of quiet longing. A young girl just stepping into adulthood met someone she loved at first sight. No one loves someone for that long when they only get to see her twice a year, no one goes out of their way to support her by visiting her younger brother’s restaurant even when it is completely out of the way and Ling never even knew. No one remembers what the other person wore or the color of their clothes at the first meeting and still remembers it perfectly years later unless they truly kept it in their heart, no one keeps a photo from a shared acting class for that many years without deep feelings. 😭 All of this makes you wonder if anyone other than Orm Kornnaphat could be this sincere. By the timeline it was five years. Five years of unspoken love and quiet devotion. And now that effort has finally been rewarded Orm. I think Orm did not just pray to be cast in TSOU with Ling. She also wished to be the one standing beside her and especially to be able to kiss her first love. Just look at the TSOU casting moment between the two of them. Orm practically pecked Ling like a little chick 🐥 LingOrm are truly equally crazy in love. I used to think Ling was already the ultimate love saint from Hong Kong. Turns out Orm has taken the crown instead, the love saint of Thailand. Orm Kornnaphat: this is the one I prayed for 💖 #หลิงออม #LingOrm #หลิงหลิงคอง #Linglingkwong #ออมกรณ์นภัส #Ormkornnaphat

Changg

63,505 views • 6 months ago

How do ZK proofs differ from multi-party computations (MPC)? 🤔 With ZK proofs, one person has private data and can prove something about it. Example: Let’s say you want to do a transaction with someone and you want to show them you have enough money. You could prove that without revealing the actual amount. With MPC, you can have many people with private data, and you can run a more complex query - a computation. Example: Let’s say you want to calculate an average salary of 3 friends without anyone revealing their salary. Each person could break down their salary into three parts that sum to the total (e.g. for 150 it might be 50 +500 -400). They give just one piece of that sum to each of the others. These are then summed together and eventually divided to calculate the average. Without anyone knowing anything they shouldn't. That is one way that MPC can work. Replace salary with any confidential data in this example and you get the idea! So, ZK proofs are like binary MPC for 1 person. Each for different use cases. 🤝 Partisia empowers complete data privacy at rest, in transit and in use through MPC, unlocking major use cases in AI, DeFI, Healthcare, RegTech, ID and more. Our founder Ivan, co inventor of the Merkle-Damgard hash function and pioneer of MPC since 1988, explains. 🎙️👇

How do ZK proofs differ from multi-party computations (MPC)? 🤔 With ZK proofs, one person has private data and can prove something about it. Example: Let’s say you want to do a transaction with someone and you want to show them you have enough money. You could prove that without revealing the actual amount. With MPC, you can have many people with private data, and you can run a more complex query - a computation. Example: Let’s say you want to calculate an average salary of 3 friends without anyone revealing their salary. Each person could break down their salary into three parts that sum to the total (e.g. for 150 it might be 50 +500 -400). They give just one piece of that sum to each of the others. These are then summed together and eventually divided to calculate the average. Without anyone knowing anything they shouldn't. That is one way that MPC can work. Replace salary with any confidential data in this example and you get the idea! So, ZK proofs are like binary MPC for 1 person. Each for different use cases. 🤝 Partisia empowers complete data privacy at rest, in transit and in use through MPC, unlocking major use cases in AI, DeFI, Healthcare, RegTech, ID and more. Our founder Ivan, co inventor of the Merkle-Damgard hash function and pioneer of MPC since 1988, explains. 🎙️👇

Partisia Blockchain

58,338 views • 1 year ago