Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Someone counted that Chenxiu changes into a total of 32 different outfits in just ONE PV 😯 CR.来碗糟粕醋吗 #Ananta #無限大Ananta #Chenxiu

Infinite Ananta

4,275 subscribers

13,355 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

#Ananta #無限大Ananta #Chenxiu

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Chenxiu has a plan to go viral. Taffy has some feedback. CR.秋逸兴 #ANANTA #無限大ANANTA #Taffy #Chenxiu

Chenxiu has a plan to go viral. Taffy has some feedback. CR.秋逸兴 #ANANTA #無限大ANANTA #Taffy #Chenxiu

Infinite Ananta

106,128 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

ANANTA wants its cities to feel truly alive: NPCs have their own stories and interactions, and even appear in different places depending on the time of day. Cre: 五五五五五十岚& 呼啦呼啦山兔酱 #ANANTA #無限大ANANTA #Taffy #Chenxiu #Richie

ANANTA wants its cities to feel truly alive: NPCs have their own stories and interactions, and even appear in different places depending on the time of day. Cre: 五五五五五十岚& 呼啦呼啦山兔酱 #ANANTA #無限大ANANTA #Taffy #Chenxiu #Richie

Infinite Ananta

17,825 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

When George Michael Changed One Note… and It Hit Different🎵 In a room full of legends, George Michael made one of the most powerful changes in Do They Know It’s Christmas and he did it with just a single note. While the line “But say a prayer” was meant to be flat and throwaway, George instinctively lifted the word “but”, turning it into something real. Something human. This wasn’t showmanship, it was soul. A tiny melodic shift that added weight, pain, and quiet compassion. This is the story of how one subtle decision in a rehearsal showed the true heart of George Michael.

When George Michael Changed One Note… and It Hit Different🎵 In a room full of legends, George Michael made one of the most powerful changes in Do They Know It’s Christmas and he did it with just a single note. While the line “But say a prayer” was meant to be flat and throwaway, George instinctively lifted the word “but”, turning it into something real. Something human. This wasn’t showmanship, it was soul. A tiny melodic shift that added weight, pain, and quiet compassion. This is the story of how one subtle decision in a rehearsal showed the true heart of George Michael.

𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 - 𝐌𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐞 - 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐞⭐️❤️

128,807 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

#WATCH | Raisina Dialogue 2026 | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "... When we look back at these 70 years, I think the expectation that we can freeze a 1945 or a 1989 forever was a very unrealistic one. In fact, look back at the 70 years. These 70 years, we debate, how did we do, why didn't it last, 70 years is 1% of Indian history. Why would 1% of Indian history last? Life moves on. I think this attachment to the past did not take into account the forces that were propelling the change... If there are going to be two big changes in this decade, one will be technology, but the other will be demographic... A lot of the analysis is obviously centred around the changes in America... My sense is you're going to have a future which will really be much more multipolar because no country today has hegemony over so many domains that it is an overall hegemon. It's not just a distribution of GDP and capabilities. I think in different domains, different parts of the world will contribute more or will have more capabilities. So the power in its different dimensions has spread out much more..."

#WATCH | Raisina Dialogue 2026 | EAM Dr S Jaishankar says, "... When we look back at these 70 years, I think the expectation that we can freeze a 1945 or a 1989 forever was a very unrealistic one. In fact, look back at the 70 years. These 70 years, we debate, how did we do, why didn't it last, 70 years is 1% of Indian history. Why would 1% of Indian history last? Life moves on. I think this attachment to the past did not take into account the forces that were propelling the change... If there are going to be two big changes in this decade, one will be technology, but the other will be demographic... A lot of the analysis is obviously centred around the changes in America... My sense is you're going to have a future which will really be much more multipolar because no country today has hegemony over so many domains that it is an overall hegemon. It's not just a distribution of GDP and capabilities. I think in different domains, different parts of the world will contribute more or will have more capabilities. So the power in its different dimensions has spread out much more..."

ANI

42,615 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

SOMEONE JUST PUBLISHED 10 FREE RULES THAT TURN A $20/MONTH SUBSCRIPTION INTO A $15,000/MONTH TEAM 90% of users type like they're googling, they get generic answers and assume that’s the limit of what’s possible Rule 1 alone changes everything, just add a job title before every task: "You are a professional resume writer who helped 500+ people land jobs at Google, Amazon, and McKinsey" The same prompt produces a resume that gets interviews instead of one that fills a template A 3-hour research project becomes 15 minutes, learning Python goes from 6 months to 30 days with a custom roadmap, and a resume gets written in 10 min 8 focused prompts in one conversation produce work that looks like it took days But it takes 30 min, freelancers who know these rules charge $150-200/hour for prompt engineering the 10 rules + 20 copy-paste prompts are free in the article below

SOMEONE JUST PUBLISHED 10 FREE RULES THAT TURN A $20/MONTH SUBSCRIPTION INTO A $15,000/MONTH TEAM 90% of users type like they're googling, they get generic answers and assume that’s the limit of what’s possible Rule 1 alone changes everything, just add a job title before every task: "You are a professional resume writer who helped 500+ people land jobs at Google, Amazon, and McKinsey" The same prompt produces a resume that gets interviews instead of one that fills a template A 3-hour research project becomes 15 minutes, learning Python goes from 6 months to 30 days with a custom roadmap, and a resume gets written in 10 min 8 focused prompts in one conversation produce work that looks like it took days But it takes 30 min, freelancers who know these rules charge $150-200/hour for prompt engineering the 10 rules + 20 copy-paste prompts are free in the article below

Chrome

12,207 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Never, ever underestimate how quickly your life can change. I almost went to law college until I didn't, and now I'm in the job of my dreams making a lot of money. I started posting videos just for fun, and the starting few videos ended up getting a million views. I lost all of my friends in school but gained one of my bestest friends in the process. The universe always makes up for lost time. You could be sitting at your desk on a random Tuesday, convinced your life is going nowhere, and three months later, you could be living in a different city because of a job you almost didn't apply for. You could go to a party you almost canceled and meet someone that changes the trajectory of your life. And that's the scary yet beautiful thing: The version of your life you're living right now can become completely unrecognizable just because of one random decision. So do not assume that your current circumstances are your permanent reality.

Never, ever underestimate how quickly your life can change. I almost went to law college until I didn't, and now I'm in the job of my dreams making a lot of money. I started posting videos just for fun, and the starting few videos ended up getting a million views. I lost all of my friends in school but gained one of my bestest friends in the process. The universe always makes up for lost time. You could be sitting at your desk on a random Tuesday, convinced your life is going nowhere, and three months later, you could be living in a different city because of a job you almost didn't apply for. You could go to a party you almost canceled and meet someone that changes the trajectory of your life. And that's the scary yet beautiful thing: The version of your life you're living right now can become completely unrecognizable just because of one random decision. So do not assume that your current circumstances are your permanent reality.

Hemansh Vaishnav

45,189 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

I gave Grok Bot $125 and walked away. it came back with $14,932 and a terminal I never asked it to build. didn't touch the keyboard once after that first message. it traded its own token launches, and somewhere in the middle of the run it built itself a clean terminal too, just so I'd have something to actually watch instead of digging through raw logs. five tokens, five trades, five wins. not one loser in the batch. > GRAVY +$814, +145% > DRONK +$1,106, +61% > PIMBO +$1,608, +44% > SNOOT +$1,997, +32% > TIZZA +$2,618, +27% what actually got me isn't any single number on that list. it's that it never traded the same way twice. read each token differently every time. how fast holders were actually stacking. whether the volume was organic or one wallet quietly inflating its own chart. how much room was left before the trade got crowded. sized every single entry off that. not a fixed bet. not a gut call on whichever chart looked the hottest. five different setups. five different reads. five different position sizes. every single one of them worked. I've watched enough of these run to know that almost never happens. usually one call bails out four bad ones and the total looks fine anyway. this wasn't that. $125 to $14,932 isn't luck stacking on luck. it's a strategy that adjusted itself five times in a row and didn't guess wrong once. that's the part I can't stop thinking about, not the total.

I gave Grok Bot $125 and walked away. it came back with $14,932 and a terminal I never asked it to build. didn't touch the keyboard once after that first message. it traded its own token launches, and somewhere in the middle of the run it built itself a clean terminal too, just so I'd have something to actually watch instead of digging through raw logs. five tokens, five trades, five wins. not one loser in the batch. > GRAVY +$814, +145% > DRONK +$1,106, +61% > PIMBO +$1,608, +44% > SNOOT +$1,997, +32% > TIZZA +$2,618, +27% what actually got me isn't any single number on that list. it's that it never traded the same way twice. read each token differently every time. how fast holders were actually stacking. whether the volume was organic or one wallet quietly inflating its own chart. how much room was left before the trade got crowded. sized every single entry off that. not a fixed bet. not a gut call on whichever chart looked the hottest. five different setups. five different reads. five different position sizes. every single one of them worked. I've watched enough of these run to know that almost never happens. usually one call bails out four bad ones and the total looks fine anyway. this wasn't that. $125 to $14,932 isn't luck stacking on luck. it's a strategy that adjusted itself five times in a row and didn't guess wrong once. that's the part I can't stop thinking about, not the total.

boan

52,143 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Will Ferrell says the iconic Anchorman news team fight was his favorite scene to film, revealing it was shot in 100-degree heat in just one day and captured the absurd comedy that defined the movie. “One of my favorite scenes in the movie. It’s such an incredible joke bag. Before we get into the fight, Brick Tamland, played by Steve Carell, is holding a grenade. We don’t know how he got ahold of it. There is a man on fire, there is someone being dragged by a net by horseback, which is kind of an homage to early Planet of the Apes.” “I think it’s something like 30 to 35 different setups, with two units, a stunt unit working at the same time as the main film unit in downtown LA in the middle of July. And I think it was 100 degrees that day.” “And we only had the one day to complete all that. And it’s probably a scene that should have taken three days to shoot. So silly, so absurdist. I think it is really one of the touchstone moments that defines the tone of Anchorman.” “I think Adam and I wanted to create this film where we got to indulge every comedy idea we ever had and follow it all the way through without someone telling us, “No, that scene’s too long,” “No one would ever do that,” “That doesn’t make sense.” We just wanted it to be like, it may not make sense, but it’s just funny.” “I think when people saw that film, they were like, “This feels like someone gave you the keys to a car and you’re 5 years old and you don’t know how to drive.” No one wanted to make it, no one understood why this would be funny. We just felt like we were playing with the house’s money, and let’s just make the craziest film we can, because we may never be allowed to make another movie ever again.”

Will Ferrell says the iconic Anchorman news team fight was his favorite scene to film, revealing it was shot in 100-degree heat in just one day and captured the absurd comedy that defined the movie. “One of my favorite scenes in the movie. It’s such an incredible joke bag. Before we get into the fight, Brick Tamland, played by Steve Carell, is holding a grenade. We don’t know how he got ahold of it. There is a man on fire, there is someone being dragged by a net by horseback, which is kind of an homage to early Planet of the Apes.” “I think it’s something like 30 to 35 different setups, with two units, a stunt unit working at the same time as the main film unit in downtown LA in the middle of July. And I think it was 100 degrees that day.” “And we only had the one day to complete all that. And it’s probably a scene that should have taken three days to shoot. So silly, so absurdist. I think it is really one of the touchstone moments that defines the tone of Anchorman.” “I think Adam and I wanted to create this film where we got to indulge every comedy idea we ever had and follow it all the way through without someone telling us, “No, that scene’s too long,” “No one would ever do that,” “That doesn’t make sense.” We just wanted it to be like, it may not make sense, but it’s just funny.” “I think when people saw that film, they were like, “This feels like someone gave you the keys to a car and you’re 5 years old and you don’t know how to drive.” No one wanted to make it, no one understood why this would be funny. We just felt like we were playing with the house’s money, and let’s just make the craziest film we can, because we may never be allowed to make another movie ever again.”

Ruzy.hl

60,067 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Science of Chanting: Why 32 Lakh Times for the Gayatri Mantra? Have you ever wondered why there is a specific count for mantra chanting in our traditions? It is not just a random number; it is a deep spiritual science based on the structure of the mantra itself. In this video, the significance of the Gayatri Mantra and its "Purushcharana" (the process of mastering a mantra) is explained through simple spiritual mathematics. The Math Behind the Mantra: - The 24 Varnas: The basic Gayatri Mantra consists of 24 syllables or letters, known as varnas. - The 24 Lakh Goal: According to Mantra Shastra, to initiate or "awaken" a mantra, one must chant it as many lakh times as there are syllables. Therefore, the basic practice requires 24 lakh chants, which a dedicated seeker can usually complete in about 2 years. The Vishvamitra Tradition: The count changes when we follow the method used by Brahmarishi Vishvamitra, which includes the Vyahritis. - Adding the Vyahritis: By adding Om and the three Vyahritis (Bhur, Bhuvah, Svah), the total count of syllables increases. - The 32 Lakh Sankalp: These additions bring the total to 32 syllables (24 + 8 = 32). To complete the full Purushcharana of this version, one must perform 32 lakh chants. This tradition shows us that every sound has weight and every chant brings us closer to spiritual awakening. It is a journey of discipline, patience, and pure devotion. Jai Maa Gayatri! If you found this insight helpful, save this post for your spiritual journey and share it with others!

The Science of Chanting: Why 32 Lakh Times for the Gayatri Mantra? Have you ever wondered why there is a specific count for mantra chanting in our traditions? It is not just a random number; it is a deep spiritual science based on the structure of the mantra itself. In this video, the significance of the Gayatri Mantra and its "Purushcharana" (the process of mastering a mantra) is explained through simple spiritual mathematics. The Math Behind the Mantra: - The 24 Varnas: The basic Gayatri Mantra consists of 24 syllables or letters, known as varnas. - The 24 Lakh Goal: According to Mantra Shastra, to initiate or "awaken" a mantra, one must chant it as many lakh times as there are syllables. Therefore, the basic practice requires 24 lakh chants, which a dedicated seeker can usually complete in about 2 years. The Vishvamitra Tradition: The count changes when we follow the method used by Brahmarishi Vishvamitra, which includes the Vyahritis. - Adding the Vyahritis: By adding Om and the three Vyahritis (Bhur, Bhuvah, Svah), the total count of syllables increases. - The 32 Lakh Sankalp: These additions bring the total to 32 syllables (24 + 8 = 32). To complete the full Purushcharana of this version, one must perform 32 lakh chants. This tradition shows us that every sound has weight and every chant brings us closer to spiritual awakening. It is a journey of discipline, patience, and pure devotion. Jai Maa Gayatri! If you found this insight helpful, save this post for your spiritual journey and share it with others!

Arpit

23,314 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Joe Rogan just sat with Jared Diamond and he casually destroyed the most quoted line in the Bible - The Bible’s most famous line Is a translation error “In the beginning was the Word.” That line was never written in English. John wrote logos. Logos does not just mean “word.” It also means rational system. Structure. Order. So the opening of the Gospel is closer to: In the beginning was the system. Then Diamond stacks the receipts. Italian has two different verbs for “I love.” Use the wrong one and you just friend-zoned someone or announced sex. German has one verb for humans eating and another for animals eating. Call a person the animal one and you just insulted them. In a New Guinea language, one wrong tone turns “beloved mother-in-law, eat this sweet potato” into “vile snake, eat this feces.” Now apply that to scripture copied through Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, and English for 2,000 years. Pastors who never learned the original language are not “interpreting.” They are guessing. This wasn’t a sermon. It was a linguist explaining why half of modern Christianity is built on a translation that flattened the meaning.

Joe Rogan just sat with Jared Diamond and he casually destroyed the most quoted line in the Bible - The Bible’s most famous line Is a translation error “In the beginning was the Word.” That line was never written in English. John wrote logos. Logos does not just mean “word.” It also means rational system. Structure. Order. So the opening of the Gospel is closer to: In the beginning was the system. Then Diamond stacks the receipts. Italian has two different verbs for “I love.” Use the wrong one and you just friend-zoned someone or announced sex. German has one verb for humans eating and another for animals eating. Call a person the animal one and you just insulted them. In a New Guinea language, one wrong tone turns “beloved mother-in-law, eat this sweet potato” into “vile snake, eat this feces.” Now apply that to scripture copied through Aramaic, Hebrew, Greek, Latin, and English for 2,000 years. Pastors who never learned the original language are not “interpreting.” They are guessing. This wasn’t a sermon. It was a linguist explaining why half of modern Christianity is built on a translation that flattened the meaning.

Defiant Ghost

259,210 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Everyone has that one game they keep coming back to. Mine changes depending on the mood. 😄 Some days it's all about quick decisions. Other days I just want something fast, fun, and competitive. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 Lucky Jet for the adrenaline. 🪙 CoinFlip when I want to keep it simple. 🚀 Rocket X when I'm feeling confident. 💎 Mines Classic if I'm in the mood to take calculated risks. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ That's one thing I enjoy about - the variety. You're not locked into one style of game, so every session can feel a little different. Today's pick? I'm leaning towards Rocket X... but I might change my mind once I log in. 😅 Explore the full collection here 👇: If you had to play just ONE of the 1w Games for the rest of the week, which one are you choosing?

Everyone has that one game they keep coming back to. Mine changes depending on the mood. 😄 Some days it's all about quick decisions. Other days I just want something fast, fun, and competitive. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 Lucky Jet for the adrenaline. 🪙 CoinFlip when I want to keep it simple. 🚀 Rocket X when I'm feeling confident. 💎 Mines Classic if I'm in the mood to take calculated risks. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ That's one thing I enjoy about - the variety. You're not locked into one style of game, so every session can feel a little different. Today's pick? I'm leaning towards Rocket X... but I might change my mind once I log in. 😅 Explore the full collection here 👇: If you had to play just ONE of the 1w Games for the rest of the week, which one are you choosing?

F E R R U M ( ♟,♟)

22,324 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Jeff Jarrett just dropped a MASSIVE take on the state of the industry, and it’s going to ruffle some feathers. While the internet wrestling community is busy debating the merits of Triple H’s creative or Tony Khan’s massive roster depth, Double J is pointing out the glaring OMISSION in today’s product: The LOST ART of booking for HEAT. Jarrett didn't shy away from the Jim Cornette conversation. He admits that while the business has evolved into a completely different beast....with streaming, no house shows, and a total shift in metrics; the fundamental truth remains: HEELS DRAW MONEY. Is the industry ignoring the one thing that actually puts butts in seats? Jarrett suggests that if you book for heat, you WILL get the payoff, citing MJF as a rare example of someone who actually understands this concept in the modern era. Are we watching a product that has abandoned the most important rule in professional wrestling? Or is the "Cornette style" of booking officially an ARCHAIC relic that has no place in 2026? SOUND OFF IN THE COMMENTS. 👇 (source: My World With Jeff Jarrett My World with Jeff Jarrett)

Jeff Jarrett just dropped a MASSIVE take on the state of the industry, and it’s going to ruffle some feathers. While the internet wrestling community is busy debating the merits of Triple H’s creative or Tony Khan’s massive roster depth, Double J is pointing out the glaring OMISSION in today’s product: The LOST ART of booking for HEAT. Jarrett didn't shy away from the Jim Cornette conversation. He admits that while the business has evolved into a completely different beast....with streaming, no house shows, and a total shift in metrics; the fundamental truth remains: HEELS DRAW MONEY. Is the industry ignoring the one thing that actually puts butts in seats? Jarrett suggests that if you book for heat, you WILL get the payoff, citing MJF as a rare example of someone who actually understands this concept in the modern era. Are we watching a product that has abandoned the most important rule in professional wrestling? Or is the "Cornette style" of booking officially an ARCHAIC relic that has no place in 2026? SOUND OFF IN THE COMMENTS. 👇 (source: My World With Jeff Jarrett My World with Jeff Jarrett)

RingsideFeed

20,070 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

HE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE TO SAY MUCH… THE LOOK SAID EVERYTHING. What makes this scene so interesting is how quickly attraction becomes the entire conversation. One character openly acknowledges what he’s feeling, while the other has to sit there and process just how direct that attention is. And that’s where the scene becomes more than just a romantic moment. There’s something almost uncomfortable about watching someone realize they’re being looked at in a completely different way. The line “Because I like it” is so simple, but it changes the energy of the entire exchange. That’s the kind of confidence that either makes a moment incredibly attractive… or incredibly awkward. The interesting question is: when does attraction stop feeling flattering and start feeling like pressure? Because this scene sits right on that line.

HE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE TO SAY MUCH… THE LOOK SAID EVERYTHING. What makes this scene so interesting is how quickly attraction becomes the entire conversation. One character openly acknowledges what he’s feeling, while the other has to sit there and process just how direct that attention is. And that’s where the scene becomes more than just a romantic moment. There’s something almost uncomfortable about watching someone realize they’re being looked at in a completely different way. The line “Because I like it” is so simple, but it changes the energy of the entire exchange. That’s the kind of confidence that either makes a moment incredibly attractive… or incredibly awkward. The interesting question is: when does attraction stop feeling flattering and start feeling like pressure? Because this scene sits right on that line.

Commentary - MovieCentral⁠

153,842 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

AI is changing the software engineering craft. Anders Hejlsberg (Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of C#, TypeScript and industry legend - on why code review needs to get more enjoyable in response: #1 - AI is shifting the craft from writing code, to reviewing code: "In a sense, we're all turning into project managers. We can have an army of junior programmers, called agents, that will just spit out reams of code but someone's got to have the big picture and review all of that. And so, increasingly, our craft is going from one of writing the code, to one of reviewing the code and building the architecture of the code and overseeing the work. It's a different kind of craft. It's a different kind of enjoyment. I've always liked writing the code. To me that was the fulfilling part, seeing it work. In a way, AI robs a little bit of that, because I am less interested in reviewing code." #2 - The code review experience should be improved: "I think we could also make the process of reviewing code much more interesting than it is today. I mean, today, you see a list of diffs in alphabetical order and now it's up to you to make heads or tails of it. There are more pedagogical ways of presenting that. And you could have commentary generated by the AI that tells you what the changes are and whatever, and then tries to guide you along. So that symbiotic relationship, I think we need to work on that more and to keep the enjoyment in there."

The Pragmatic Engineer

39,073 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨Mikel Arteta on Myles Lewis-Skelly taking over Arsenal's midfield: 🗣️ "One of the reasons we've remained patient in this transfer window is because of what we've seen from Myles Lewis-Skelly. When you have a young player showing this level of maturity, composure and understanding of the game, it changes the conversations you have internally." "He's not playing like someone who's just broken into the first team. He's playing with the confidence of an established professional. That's a massive credit to him because he has earned the trust of everyone at the club." "His biggest strength is his versatility. He can play in midfield, he can adapt to different roles, and he understands exactly what the team needs in every phase of the game. Players like that are incredibly rare." "Of course we're always looking at opportunities in the transfer market, but we're not going to sign players for the sake of it. If we believe Myles is ready to take that next step, then we'll back him completely." "People keep asking Arsenal to spend another £80 or £100 million on a midfielder. Sometimes the best signing isn't the one you buy, it's the one you've already developed. I believe Myles Lewis-Skelly has everything to become one of the best midfielders in Europe, and if that means we upset a few people by putting our faith in him instead of chasing another expensive name, then so be it."

🚨Mikel Arteta on Myles Lewis-Skelly taking over Arsenal's midfield: 🗣️ "One of the reasons we've remained patient in this transfer window is because of what we've seen from Myles Lewis-Skelly. When you have a young player showing this level of maturity, composure and understanding of the game, it changes the conversations you have internally." "He's not playing like someone who's just broken into the first team. He's playing with the confidence of an established professional. That's a massive credit to him because he has earned the trust of everyone at the club." "His biggest strength is his versatility. He can play in midfield, he can adapt to different roles, and he understands exactly what the team needs in every phase of the game. Players like that are incredibly rare." "Of course we're always looking at opportunities in the transfer market, but we're not going to sign players for the sake of it. If we believe Myles is ready to take that next step, then we'll back him completely." "People keep asking Arsenal to spend another £80 or £100 million on a midfielder. Sometimes the best signing isn't the one you buy, it's the one you've already developed. I believe Myles Lewis-Skelly has everything to become one of the best midfielders in Europe, and if that means we upset a few people by putting our faith in him instead of chasing another expensive name, then so be it."

The Arsenal Stand

137,856 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

What you're looking at started as something that most people drive past without a second thought. - Industrial - boring - overlooked And someone looked at it and saw something no one else was seeing. That's the whole game here. You don't have to invent something brand new to make serious money. You just have to see potential where everyone else sees limitations. You have to look at what already exists and imagine it just a little differently. So when you turn something familiar into something unexpected, it becomes shareable and memorable. It becomes the thing that people can't stop talking about because it's different in a world where everything feels the same. People will literally travel hours just to stay somewhere like this because different is the experience now. Nobody cares about another cookie cutter hotel room that they've seen a thousand times, but this gets filmed and posted and sent to friends with the caption "you have to see this place" And suddenly you're booked out months in advance because you gave something people can't get anywhere else. I love that the raw materials here aren't special, it's just space that was sitting there unused and cheap to acquire The success of this is found in the willingness to look at what everyone else ignored and ask "what could this become?" Instead of just accepting what currently is. That's where the opportunity is. There are thousands of: - shipping containers rotting in fields - old grain silos sitting empty - warehouses no one's using - barns that haven't been touched in decades And every single one of them could become something people would pay to experience if someone just had the vision to see it through. You don't need to build it from scratch. You just need to reimagine what's already sitting in front of you. Because the world is full of overlooked things waiting for someone to look at them differently. And I don't care if AI generated the video because the inspiration you get from it is still the same.

Chris Koerner

18,318 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“One of the best conferences I’ve ever been to.” That’s how Aubrey Strobel described the Eve Wealth Summit. Aubrey is a leading voice in Bitcoin and financial empowerment and someone who has been helping bring more women into this space for years. What stood out most wasn’t just the setting, it was the quality of conversation, the relationships built, and the real outcomes that came from it. As our Co-founder Elaine Asher (elaineasher.eth) shared, Eve was created to build a different kind of room, one where women can connect, collaborate, and actually do business together. We’re so excited to have Aubrey Strobel back with us this year! April 20–22 · Arizona Biltmore Get your ticket now🎟

“One of the best conferences I’ve ever been to.” That’s how Aubrey Strobel described the Eve Wealth Summit. Aubrey is a leading voice in Bitcoin and financial empowerment and someone who has been helping bring more women into this space for years. What stood out most wasn’t just the setting, it was the quality of conversation, the relationships built, and the real outcomes that came from it. As our Co-founder Elaine Asher (elaineasher.eth) shared, Eve was created to build a different kind of room, one where women can connect, collaborate, and actually do business together. We’re so excited to have Aubrey Strobel back with us this year! April 20–22 · Arizona Biltmore Get your ticket now🎟

evewealthhq

56,728 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

SHE THOUGHT THEY WERE JUST FILMING A NORMAL ASMR VIDEO. 10 SECONDS LATER THEY COULDN’T EVEN KEEP A STRAIGHT FACE. At first, it looks like a completely normal recording. Two girls are sitting in front of a binaural microphone, one on each side, talking quietly, laughing, and getting ready to film what looks like a simple ASMR clip. Nothing unusual. Then they start getting closer to the mic. One girl whispers into one ear. The other immediately takes over the opposite side. A few seconds later they’re both trying not to laugh while continuing the recording like nothing happened. And that’s probably the most believable part of the video. Nobody looks like they’re performing in some expensive studio. It feels more like two friends decided to turn the camera on and mess around with an ASMR microphone just to see what would happen. That kind of simplicity is exactly what makes short-form content easy to watch. The viewer understands the situation almost instantly. Two girls. One microphone. A slightly awkward challenge. And you keep watching because you want to see what they do next. If a creator turned this into a recurring character or series — different girls, different ASMR challenges, different reactions, different locations — there’s a real content format underneath it. The short clips bring attention. The character keeps people coming back. And the money comes later. For example, 500 people paying $10 a month would be $5,000 in gross monthly revenue before platform fees and taxes. Not their actual earnings. Just what a relatively small paid audience can look like once people become attached to the content and the characters behind it. Sometimes the most believable AI content isn’t the content that looks the most cinematic. It’s the content that feels like someone simply pulled out their phone at exactly the right moment.

SHE THOUGHT THEY WERE JUST FILMING A NORMAL ASMR VIDEO. 10 SECONDS LATER THEY COULDN’T EVEN KEEP A STRAIGHT FACE. At first, it looks like a completely normal recording. Two girls are sitting in front of a binaural microphone, one on each side, talking quietly, laughing, and getting ready to film what looks like a simple ASMR clip. Nothing unusual. Then they start getting closer to the mic. One girl whispers into one ear. The other immediately takes over the opposite side. A few seconds later they’re both trying not to laugh while continuing the recording like nothing happened. And that’s probably the most believable part of the video. Nobody looks like they’re performing in some expensive studio. It feels more like two friends decided to turn the camera on and mess around with an ASMR microphone just to see what would happen. That kind of simplicity is exactly what makes short-form content easy to watch. The viewer understands the situation almost instantly. Two girls. One microphone. A slightly awkward challenge. And you keep watching because you want to see what they do next. If a creator turned this into a recurring character or series — different girls, different ASMR challenges, different reactions, different locations — there’s a real content format underneath it. The short clips bring attention. The character keeps people coming back. And the money comes later. For example, 500 people paying $10 a month would be $5,000 in gross monthly revenue before platform fees and taxes. Not their actual earnings. Just what a relatively small paid audience can look like once people become attached to the content and the characters behind it. Sometimes the most believable AI content isn’t the content that looks the most cinematic. It’s the content that feels like someone simply pulled out their phone at exactly the right moment.

stariybog

24,656 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen