Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Someone help me understand how Meta misses such basic product UX. When you hold down the power button there is no immediate noise or light to confirm it is doing *anything*. You have to look through the lens to know if it’s booting up. It takes about 13 seconds...

365,796 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

Phil profil fotoğrafı
Phil2 yıl önce

Did i just turn it off or is it turning back on?

Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com) profil fotoğrafı
Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com)2 yıl önce

@brandnarb

Vaidas Vai profil fotoğrafı
Vaidas Vai2 yıl önce

There was a *turn on* sound many generatios ago. People complained it’s too loud - and it was, especially if you turn the headset after putting it on. Well, instead of lowering the sound volume, they removed it completely.

Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com) profil fotoğrafı
Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com)2 yıl önce

Thanks that sort of explains things. But what about the LED?

David Heaney profil fotoğrafı
David Heaney2 yıl önce

It's a headset. You're meant to put it on your head first, not watch it sit on a desk. "find me any device made in the last 5 years that acts like this" Apple Vision Pro!

Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com) profil fotoğrafı
Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com)2 yıl önce

Vision Pro puts an image on the front display in a second or two, but I agree the image should cover the whole display so it’s easier to see and it could use a noise too!

Luna profil fotoğrafı
Luna2 yıl önce

I mean there was a "boot start" noise way back in the Quest 1 days (that was loud enough to be heard while it's not being worn) but people were about finding it annoying and it was removed.

Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com) profil fotoğrafı
Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com)2 yıl önce

For real? I never heard anyone mention that.

Palmer Luckey profil fotoğrafı
Palmer Luckey2 yıl önce

The hardware team isn't comprised of shanghai'd web developers.

Henry Ventura profil fotoğrafı
Henry Ventura2 yıl önce

@boztank UwU 👉👈

Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com) profil fotoğrafı
Ben Lang ᯅ (bsky @ben.roadtovr.com)2 yıl önce

@boztank 😂

Benzer Videolar

Jensen Huang: the character of a company is the most important thing “The character of a company is what makes it ultimately successful,” Jensen begins. “How resilient is it? How does it deal with adversity? How does it deal with learning when it’s presented with new assumptions? If the conditions change, how agile is the company?” Jensen elaborates on how you instill these values in a company: “You talk about it. You teach it. You live it. Nvidia’s really fortunate because we suffered so greatly in the beginning. For the first 15 years of our company, it was one adversity after another. Maybe 5-7 times it was existential.” It ultimately comes down to the character of the people. “It’s the people’s resilience,” He argues. “A company is made of people. It’s not made of the document that describes the culture. It’s not the inscription of the core values on the building. That’s not what makes the company’s culture. It’s the people and how the company overcame existential crises or incredible adversity — the agility, cleverness, creativity, ingenuity, will power, and incredible ability to suffer extraordinary pain — that is the corporate character.” Jensen once remarked, “my will to survive exceeds almost everybody else’s will to kill me.” He elaborates on what he meant by this: “It’s pretty hard to discourage me, and if I believe in something, I’m just going to keep doing it until it’s done and until we’re great at it. It’s hard to deter me. It’s hard to distract me. It’s hard to discourage me. In my mind, it’s always, ‘How hard can this be?’ And it turns out that every time it’s incredibly hard. But I’m surrounded by amazing people helping me.” Video source: Norges Bank (2023)

Startup Archive

24,898 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Peter Thiel on $NVDA (about a year ago): It is probably quite tricky. If you had to concretize it, one thing that is very strange is if you just follow the money, at this point 80 to 85% of the money in AI is being made by one company, it is NVIDIA. It is all on this very weird hardware layer, which Silicon Valley does not even know very much about anymore. We do not really do hardware, we do not do silicon chips in Silicon Valley anymore. I get pitched on these companies once every three or four years, and it is always, I have no clue how to do this, it sounds like a pretty good idea, but man, I have no clue, and we never invest. There is this theory that the hardware piece makes the money initially, then gets more commodified over time, and it will shift to software. And the, I do not know, multi trillion dollar question is whether that is going to be true again this time, or whether NVIDIA will have this incredible monopoly. I suspect NVIDIA will. I think it will maintain its position for a while. I think the game theory on it is something like this. All the big tech companies are going to start trying to design their own AI chips so they do not have to pay the 10x markup to NVIDIA. How hard is it for them to do it? How long will it take? If they all do it, then the chips become a commodity and nobody makes money in chips. So do you go into hardware? You should do it if nobody else is doing it. If everybody does it, you should not do it. I am not sure how that nets out, but probably people stay stuck for a while and NVIDIA goes from strength to strength for a while.

Wall St Engine

824,845 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

14,297 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Naval Ravikant’s checklist for starting a company “The most important thing is there are no formulas. At the end of the day, you have to do what you love, and you have to do it even though people tell you it’ll never work. But that being said, if there was a formula [for starting a company], I would put it something like this.” Naval started seven companies before AngelList and this is the checklist he recommends running through before starting a startup: 1. Pick a great cofounder. This is most important: “You can do a company on your own, but it’s like you can raise a child on your own, but you probably shouldn’t. You need someone who’s going to be there with you.” This has it’s own checklist. Your cofounder should be: a. Very high intelligence (”hopefully they make you feel dumb, or they’re not smart enough”) b. Very high energy (”They should be extremely hardworking. A founder is someone who never has to be motivated. You should not have to be telling them to do their job.”) c. Very high integrity. (”a smart, hardworking crook who’s going to cheat you is the worst kind of person to be paired up with.”) 2. Pick a very large market. “Notice I don’t talk about the idea. I think ideas are almost irrelevant… The more important thing is that you pick a large space that you’re knowledgeable and passionate about. And then you will figure out what the right thing to do within that space is.” You want to be able to say to investors: “This is a space where there’s a huge market. I’m really knowledgeable and passionate about it. Here’s the great person that I have doing it with me. And here’s the minimum viable product that we have built. That will show that we can test in the marketplace… You iterate until you get to product/market fit… And then you go and you raise money from people you trust. And you use that money to scale.”

Startup Archive

36,050 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,320 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce