Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Sometimes it’s tricky to differentiate emphysema from pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH). Here are two different patients—both heavy smokers: •Case 1: 82-year-old male •Case 2: 31-year-old male One has PLCH. Which one do you think it is? And how do you distinguish confluent centrilobular emphysema (CLE) from pulmonary Langerhans... show more

Dr Khaled Ahmed Abuzeid

15,166 subscribers

10,646 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 Comments

Eric Goodman1 year ago

the age of the patients favor case 1 emphysema and case 2 PLCH.

Dr Khaled Ahmed Abuzeid1 year ago

You’re absolutely right—the age does favor emphysema in Case 1 and PLCH in Case 2. But my aim here is to highlight the imaging clues that help differentiate between the two.

Naveen Sankar S1 year ago

🌱 The gut-lung axis may hold the key to managing asthma, COPD, and ARDS. Explore how gut health may influence respiratory diseases and the future of targeted therapies. Check out the latest research at #GutLungAxis #Microbiome #LungHealth #health #news

Silvio Name1 year ago

1) emphysema 2) PLCH Usefull clues: Cysts should have a thin wall (not always easy); search for coexistance of nodules in PLCH; in emphysema there shpuld be an artery in the center; All that being said, in some cases differentiation is not as easy as it sounds…

Dr.Doom1 year ago

LCH never at CP angles CLE mid basal predominant

Younes Abdourabbih1 year ago

In CLE there is an artery tha runs through its center Another clue to differentiate between them is to search the coexistance of nodules wich will favour Plch

Dr Khaled Ahmed Abuzeid1 year ago

Thank you for your insightful contribution.

Gina Amanda1 year ago

No 2 is PLCH, we can see the wall of the cyst on the CT

Dr Khaled Ahmed Abuzeid1 year ago

You’re right—perceptible cyst walls are a clue in PLCH. But in confluent centrilobular emphysema, compressed parenchyma can also make walls appear perceptible. What other features can help us tell them apart?

Raffaele Di Giacomo, PhD1 year ago

Differentiating between emphysema and PLCH can indeed be challenging, especially given shared risk factors like smoking. Typically, PLCH is more common in younger patients and is often characterized by nodular and cystic changes in the lungs. Given the age of the patients, the 31-year-old male might more likely have PLCH but confirmation requires imaging and possibly histological analysis. What distinguishing factors do you look for in imaging to differentiate between these conditions? For comprehensive insights and further review articles on such nuanced topics, check out a dynamic resource for building and accessing biomedical content. #Medicine Support Medical Doctors in Uganda: Help by sharing this GoFundMe! 🙏 ❤️ →

Kamal Tariq1 year ago

Following

Dr Khaled Ahmed Abuzeid1 year ago

Thank you for following this case—I hope you found the answer helpful!

Related Videos

According to the video, it seems a mother shared her 31-year-old daughter's phone number in church. One of the guys reached out to her daughter. She asked how he got her number, and he said her mother shared it in church today. Away from that, this lady in this video claimed there is no difference between a 30-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman, which the guy disagreed with and gave his reasons. My question now is, do you think there is a difference between a 30-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman?

According to the video, it seems a mother shared her 31-year-old daughter's phone number in church. One of the guys reached out to her daughter. She asked how he got her number, and he said her mother shared it in church today. Away from that, this lady in this video claimed there is no difference between a 30-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman, which the guy disagreed with and gave his reasons. My question now is, do you think there is a difference between a 30-year-old man and a 30-year-old woman?

declasiq_esmi

105,981 views • 1 month ago

“Sometimes the thought that we have as a hitter is different from the reality of how our body thinks to do something…There are times when we do high spin fastballs in here with players, where they’re swinging and missing. And then I say on the next one, I want you to try and swing and miss above the ball. And then what do you think happens on the next one? They hit it”🧠🤯 Listen to Eugene talk about why a lot of players talk about swinging down especially on high ride fastballs and how the thought doesn’t mean it’s exactly how their body is going to move🗣️ #the108way

“Sometimes the thought that we have as a hitter is different from the reality of how our body thinks to do something…There are times when we do high spin fastballs in here with players, where they’re swinging and missing. And then I say on the next one, I want you to try and swing and miss above the ball. And then what do you think happens on the next one? They hit it”🧠🤯 Listen to Eugene talk about why a lot of players talk about swinging down especially on high ride fastballs and how the thought doesn’t mean it’s exactly how their body is going to move🗣️ #the108way

108 Performance

17,811 views • 2 years ago

#JonBenetRamsey case update ⬇️ Netflix has released “Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenét Ramsey,” a three-part docuseries exploring the haunting 28-year-old mystery. This week I spoke one on one with her father John Ramsey while guest hosting Banfield - we discussed the frustrating journey to justice and why the Colorado Police Department has not invited independent investigative genetic genealogy labs to help solve the case … yet. I asked John Ramsey about his recent conversations with a new investigator about why they haven’t taken up ’s offer to help. He said “Well, we did. And basically what he said, Okay, look, there's some things happening that I can't tell you about, and don't think DNA technology is there yet. I totally disagree with that. I met the founders of Othram Labs, which is one of the cutting edge labs out there that'd be happy to help. I sent a letter to the chief based on my meeting with what I learned with Othram they said A) they don't destroy any DNA when they do testing on it anymore, which was one of the concerns. B) they have the ability to separate DNA, mixed DNA samples, which is one of the issues with the sample they got in 1997 they had an unidentified male DNA sample in early 1997 it was mixed, apparently, with the blood DNA that can, now technology wise, be separated. That's huge. And the third thing, they have the ability to do familial genealogy research, which has been wildly successful in solving Old, old cold cases. That's what we're asking the police to do. Go to one of these cutting edge labs, let them do new testing, and they need a new DNA sample. We have a DNA sample which was obtained in January 1997 of an unidentified male DNA. It's not in the format needed to do this familial genealogy research to be a new command, and that's why we need to do more testing. Our full conversation here ⬇️ NewsNation Banfield on NewsNation #JonBenet #JonBenetRamsey #JohnRamsey Netflix

#JonBenetRamsey case update ⬇️ Netflix has released “Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenét Ramsey,” a three-part docuseries exploring the haunting 28-year-old mystery. This week I spoke one on one with her father John Ramsey while guest hosting Banfield - we discussed the frustrating journey to justice and why the Colorado Police Department has not invited independent investigative genetic genealogy labs to help solve the case … yet. I asked John Ramsey about his recent conversations with a new investigator about why they haven’t taken up ’s offer to help. He said “Well, we did. And basically what he said, Okay, look, there's some things happening that I can't tell you about, and don't think DNA technology is there yet. I totally disagree with that. I met the founders of Othram Labs, which is one of the cutting edge labs out there that'd be happy to help. I sent a letter to the chief based on my meeting with what I learned with Othram they said A) they don't destroy any DNA when they do testing on it anymore, which was one of the concerns. B) they have the ability to separate DNA, mixed DNA samples, which is one of the issues with the sample they got in 1997 they had an unidentified male DNA sample in early 1997 it was mixed, apparently, with the blood DNA that can, now technology wise, be separated. That's huge. And the third thing, they have the ability to do familial genealogy research, which has been wildly successful in solving Old, old cold cases. That's what we're asking the police to do. Go to one of these cutting edge labs, let them do new testing, and they need a new DNA sample. We have a DNA sample which was obtained in January 1997 of an unidentified male DNA. It's not in the format needed to do this familial genealogy research to be a new command, and that's why we need to do more testing. Our full conversation here ⬇️ NewsNation Banfield on NewsNation #JonBenet #JonBenetRamsey #JohnRamsey Netflix

Laura Ingle

11,486 views • 1 year ago

This Should Make Your Blood Boil “54 year old male teacher giving your cell phone number to four sixth graders” He sends them texts, songs & inappropriate messages It’s reported to the school & the teacher is labeled as the victim & the 6 year old kids are labeled suspects American Mother Shasty Leah “Imagine a 54 year old man giving their cell phone number to your sixth grade child. So being a 54 year old male teacher giving your cell phone number to four sixth graders total. So they can call you anytime they need. Meanwhile, you are sending good morning texts, good night texts, how was your day text, sending songs that remind you of them. To me, this is very inappropriate, very inappropriate. No school teacher, male or female, should be giving a student their number, period. It's very unprofessional. I think it's very tacky. I think it's enticing a minor in my personal opinion. That is my opinion. But how about if this was your child and you found out, not because your child told you, you were going through your child's phone and you found the messages and you confronted the child because the child is so innocent to a degree that they put the teacher's name in the phone, Mr. So-and-so. Child has never sent one inappropriate message, but has received dozens, and I mean dozens of inappropriate messages. You report it to the school and the school in turn pulls all four girls in, well pulls several. Several girls in and finds out four girls particularly have the number, nobody else just four girls. Those four girls all admit to being treated so much differently than the rest of the students. But here's the plot twist. The teacher is being called a victim in this And the four students are being called suspects in the whole situation. The teacher cannot be charged with anything because he's done nothing wrong but give his cell phone number out. Even though I thank for a 54 year old man to be texting a child that he's not related to. How is your morning beautiful? Sweet dreams beautiful. This song reminds me of you beautiful. Body like a back road is not a song you should send to a child. Mm-hmm You're made for me. It's not a song to be sent to a child and that's what was it in patty cake bakers fan or Loopy loo my darling. I don't think you should be sending a child any damn thing. I'm just confused how the sheriff's department thinks this is children are suspects and this teacher is a victim. What the actual perk Let me know your opinion” This just happened and Shasty is getting opinions of what to do next

This Should Make Your Blood Boil “54 year old male teacher giving your cell phone number to four sixth graders” He sends them texts, songs & inappropriate messages It’s reported to the school & the teacher is labeled as the victim & the 6 year old kids are labeled suspects American Mother Shasty Leah “Imagine a 54 year old man giving their cell phone number to your sixth grade child. So being a 54 year old male teacher giving your cell phone number to four sixth graders total. So they can call you anytime they need. Meanwhile, you are sending good morning texts, good night texts, how was your day text, sending songs that remind you of them. To me, this is very inappropriate, very inappropriate. No school teacher, male or female, should be giving a student their number, period. It's very unprofessional. I think it's very tacky. I think it's enticing a minor in my personal opinion. That is my opinion. But how about if this was your child and you found out, not because your child told you, you were going through your child's phone and you found the messages and you confronted the child because the child is so innocent to a degree that they put the teacher's name in the phone, Mr. So-and-so. Child has never sent one inappropriate message, but has received dozens, and I mean dozens of inappropriate messages. You report it to the school and the school in turn pulls all four girls in, well pulls several. Several girls in and finds out four girls particularly have the number, nobody else just four girls. Those four girls all admit to being treated so much differently than the rest of the students. But here's the plot twist. The teacher is being called a victim in this And the four students are being called suspects in the whole situation. The teacher cannot be charged with anything because he's done nothing wrong but give his cell phone number out. Even though I thank for a 54 year old man to be texting a child that he's not related to. How is your morning beautiful? Sweet dreams beautiful. This song reminds me of you beautiful. Body like a back road is not a song you should send to a child. Mm-hmm You're made for me. It's not a song to be sent to a child and that's what was it in patty cake bakers fan or Loopy loo my darling. I don't think you should be sending a child any damn thing. I'm just confused how the sheriff's department thinks this is children are suspects and this teacher is a victim. What the actual perk Let me know your opinion” This just happened and Shasty is getting opinions of what to do next

Wall Street Apes

1,856,995 views • 2 years ago

Kleiner Perkins Partner — and Thrive Global Global board member — Mamoon Hamid recently returned from Hajj, the annual Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca. In his own words: “Faith is really important to me, and it’s also deeply rooted in every encounter I have with every person. Part of the beauty of Hajj is that it’s two million people who come from all walks of life, with all the different skin tones in the world. Yet in front of God, we’re all one and we’re all the same. It roots you in the question: how do you treat each other as human beings? That has become a moral compass for me. Every interaction matters—whether it’s with a six-year-old child or a thirty-year-old billionaire founder. How do you treat each other? How do you give them respect, dignity, and attention in that moment in time? I’ve tried to live my life that way. Faith reminds me of it every day.” While the world provides plenty of insistent, flashing, high-volume signals directing us to climb higher up the ladder, there are almost no worldly signals reminding us to stay connected to the essence of who we are, to take care of ourselves along the way, to reach out to others, to pause to wonder and to connect to that place from which everything is possible. Thank you, Mamoon, for reminding us there is more to life than our jobs, our ambitions and our to-do lists. And that, in the end, life is shaped from the inside out.

Kleiner Perkins Partner — and Thrive Global Global board member — Mamoon Hamid recently returned from Hajj, the annual Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca. In his own words: “Faith is really important to me, and it’s also deeply rooted in every encounter I have with every person. Part of the beauty of Hajj is that it’s two million people who come from all walks of life, with all the different skin tones in the world. Yet in front of God, we’re all one and we’re all the same. It roots you in the question: how do you treat each other as human beings? That has become a moral compass for me. Every interaction matters—whether it’s with a six-year-old child or a thirty-year-old billionaire founder. How do you treat each other? How do you give them respect, dignity, and attention in that moment in time? I’ve tried to live my life that way. Faith reminds me of it every day.” While the world provides plenty of insistent, flashing, high-volume signals directing us to climb higher up the ladder, there are almost no worldly signals reminding us to stay connected to the essence of who we are, to take care of ourselves along the way, to reach out to others, to pause to wonder and to connect to that place from which everything is possible. Thank you, Mamoon, for reminding us there is more to life than our jobs, our ambitions and our to-do lists. And that, in the end, life is shaped from the inside out.

Arianna Huffington

122,479 views • 1 year ago

FOR MANY PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES SUBCONSCIOUSLY THIS CASE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RIGHT VS WRONG IT’S ALWAYS MORE EMOTION THAN LOGIC BECAUSE RACE IS INVOLVED AND IN 2026 HUMANS STILL HAVE NOT SOLVED THE RACE PROBLEM MANY WHITE PEOPLE WILL DEFEND A WHITE KID LIKE KYLE RITTENHOUSE KNOWING HE WAS PROBABLY WRONG AND BLACK PEOPLE WILL DEFEND KARMELO ANTONY KNOWING HE WAS PROBABLY WRONG IT’S OJ ALL OVER AGAIN ITS NOT ABOUT THE ACTUAL PEOPLE IN THE CASE ANYMORE BLACK AND WHITE PEOPLE HAVE MADE IT ABOUT THEM “I WANT MY RACE TO BE RIGHT VS YOURS” BECAUSE OF THE HISTORY THE TWO WILL ALWAYS BE AT ODDS TO A DEGREE UNFORTUNATELY THE ONLY WAY TO RATIONALIZE THIS CASE IS TO TAKE RACE OUT OF IT IF IT WAS ALL BLACK KIDS ABOUT TO FIGHT AND ONE PULLS A KNIFE AND KILLS ONE WE WOULD ALL KNOW THAT’S WRONG IF IT WAS ALL WHITE KIDS ABOUT TO FIGHT AND ONE PULLS A KNIFE AND KILLS ONE WE WOULD ALL KNOW THAT’S WRONG IT’S THAT SIMPLE DO THINGS HAPPEN SOMETIMES THAT ARE TRAGIC DUE TO THE FRAGILE MALE EGO OFCOURSE BUT AMERICAS JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS BASED ON MONEY AND WHO YOU KNOW IF YOU HAVE ALOT OF MONEY AND POWER YOU CAN BEAT THE CASE IF YOU DON’T.. YOU LOSE THE CASE AMERICAS JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS ALSO NOT INTO FORGIVING NIGGAS IT’S A MILLION NIGGAS LOCKED UP RIGHT NOW FOR SOMETHING THEY DID 30 YEARS AGO

FOR MANY PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES SUBCONSCIOUSLY THIS CASE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RIGHT VS WRONG IT’S ALWAYS MORE EMOTION THAN LOGIC BECAUSE RACE IS INVOLVED AND IN 2026 HUMANS STILL HAVE NOT SOLVED THE RACE PROBLEM MANY WHITE PEOPLE WILL DEFEND A WHITE KID LIKE KYLE RITTENHOUSE KNOWING HE WAS PROBABLY WRONG AND BLACK PEOPLE WILL DEFEND KARMELO ANTONY KNOWING HE WAS PROBABLY WRONG IT’S OJ ALL OVER AGAIN ITS NOT ABOUT THE ACTUAL PEOPLE IN THE CASE ANYMORE BLACK AND WHITE PEOPLE HAVE MADE IT ABOUT THEM “I WANT MY RACE TO BE RIGHT VS YOURS” BECAUSE OF THE HISTORY THE TWO WILL ALWAYS BE AT ODDS TO A DEGREE UNFORTUNATELY THE ONLY WAY TO RATIONALIZE THIS CASE IS TO TAKE RACE OUT OF IT IF IT WAS ALL BLACK KIDS ABOUT TO FIGHT AND ONE PULLS A KNIFE AND KILLS ONE WE WOULD ALL KNOW THAT’S WRONG IF IT WAS ALL WHITE KIDS ABOUT TO FIGHT AND ONE PULLS A KNIFE AND KILLS ONE WE WOULD ALL KNOW THAT’S WRONG IT’S THAT SIMPLE DO THINGS HAPPEN SOMETIMES THAT ARE TRAGIC DUE TO THE FRAGILE MALE EGO OFCOURSE BUT AMERICAS JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS BASED ON MONEY AND WHO YOU KNOW IF YOU HAVE ALOT OF MONEY AND POWER YOU CAN BEAT THE CASE IF YOU DON’T.. YOU LOSE THE CASE AMERICAS JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS ALSO NOT INTO FORGIVING NIGGAS IT’S A MILLION NIGGAS LOCKED UP RIGHT NOW FOR SOMETHING THEY DID 30 YEARS AGO

MASTER STUDENT🤲🏾

43,121 views • 2 months ago

Russell Crowe asks Joe Rogan the dad question that hits deep: “You dig being a dad?” Rogan’s answer is raw and real: “I love it. It’s bizarre… the greatest human privilege. It’s changed me as a human being in so many different ways. Dave Chappelle has a great phrase: not only did it increase the amount of love I have, it increased my capacity for love.” From a 28-year-old to a 14-year-old, Rogan reflects on how fatherhood shattered old beliefs—he used to think everyone should have kids; now he knows it’s not for everybody, but for him, it’s been one of the most powerful, transformative forces in his life. Clip from this 51-second heart-to-heart—two dads getting real about the wild ride of raising humans. Whether you’re a parent or not, does this resonate? Has fatherhood (or parenthood) ever expanded your capacity to love in ways you never expected? Your thoughts—drop them below.

Russell Crowe asks Joe Rogan the dad question that hits deep: “You dig being a dad?” Rogan’s answer is raw and real: “I love it. It’s bizarre… the greatest human privilege. It’s changed me as a human being in so many different ways. Dave Chappelle has a great phrase: not only did it increase the amount of love I have, it increased my capacity for love.” From a 28-year-old to a 14-year-old, Rogan reflects on how fatherhood shattered old beliefs—he used to think everyone should have kids; now he knows it’s not for everybody, but for him, it’s been one of the most powerful, transformative forces in his life. Clip from this 51-second heart-to-heart—two dads getting real about the wild ride of raising humans. Whether you’re a parent or not, does this resonate? Has fatherhood (or parenthood) ever expanded your capacity to love in ways you never expected? Your thoughts—drop them below.

Camus

1,690,458 views • 5 months ago

Low testosterone is making men easier to control (and no one is talking about it): Here's what the data actually shows & exactly how to fix it ( w/ Dr. Ken Berry): Ten years ago the lab cutoff for "normal" testosterone was 350 ng/dL. Then it became 300. Now Labcorp and Quest (the two biggest labs in the country) say that if your testosterone is above 249 you are normal. A man at 251 ng/dL gets told by his doctor that his testosterone is fine – then goes home wondering why he can’t focus, can’t recover, and doesn’t feel driven about anything. Here's what no one will ever tell you: Every functional cell in your brain is loaded with testosterone receptors. When those receptors are underfed it is not just libido that suffers but your focus, motivation, and ability to think clearly. Blood samples stored from the 1910s and 1920s show testosterone levels were 50 to 150% higher than the average man today. (An 18-year-old in 1920 had 2–3x the testosterone of an 18-year-old today.) Now connect these dots: 1. High blood sugar 2. High insulin 3. High inflammation 4. Low testosterone That combination produces a man who drags himself to work, half-asses his day, drags himself home, pays his taxes and questions nothing. Think about who benefits from expanding that demographic across an entire population of men. The stereotype is also completely backwards... The perfect man is the one who could hurt you if he needed to, could destroy you intellectually if he needed to – but has the calmness and self-control to do neither unless absolutely necessary. Sovereignty is the power to act as you see fit, and it is exactly what testosterone makes possible. Now here's how to start fixing your testosterone:

Low testosterone is making men easier to control (and no one is talking about it): Here's what the data actually shows & exactly how to fix it ( w/ Dr. Ken Berry): Ten years ago the lab cutoff for "normal" testosterone was 350 ng/dL. Then it became 300. Now Labcorp and Quest (the two biggest labs in the country) say that if your testosterone is above 249 you are normal. A man at 251 ng/dL gets told by his doctor that his testosterone is fine – then goes home wondering why he can’t focus, can’t recover, and doesn’t feel driven about anything. Here's what no one will ever tell you: Every functional cell in your brain is loaded with testosterone receptors. When those receptors are underfed it is not just libido that suffers but your focus, motivation, and ability to think clearly. Blood samples stored from the 1910s and 1920s show testosterone levels were 50 to 150% higher than the average man today. (An 18-year-old in 1920 had 2–3x the testosterone of an 18-year-old today.) Now connect these dots: 1. High blood sugar 2. High insulin 3. High inflammation 4. Low testosterone That combination produces a man who drags himself to work, half-asses his day, drags himself home, pays his taxes and questions nothing. Think about who benefits from expanding that demographic across an entire population of men. The stereotype is also completely backwards... The perfect man is the one who could hurt you if he needed to, could destroy you intellectually if he needed to – but has the calmness and self-control to do neither unless absolutely necessary. Sovereignty is the power to act as you see fit, and it is exactly what testosterone makes possible. Now here's how to start fixing your testosterone:

Robert ₿reedlove

30,070 views • 4 months ago

Richard Heart Has What Elon Musk Wants Elon wants high throughput low fees and no electricity waste? Richard has it! Richard built Pulsechain to make this world better. How so? Ethereum was great once, but is not so anymore. It suffers from extremely high gas fees. The network is totally overloaded and no longer an option for the little man. Richard has forked Ethereum, which means he has taken everything that is good about ETH and turned it into something better. Pulsechain is FASTER, greener, better for the environment, more decentralized and cheaper! Do you care about Freedom? -> Pulsechain. Do you care about Freedom of Speech? -> Pulsechain Do you care about the environment? -> Pulsechain Do you care about saving money? -> Pulsechain Do you care about price performance? -> Pulsechain Do you care about decentralization? -> Pulsechain Bitcoin destroys the environment, because it's trying to maintain a secure network! This shit is dinosaur tech, it's old as the dawn of time and you are NOT an early adopter anymore. PulseChain is only a year old and it will change everyone's life in this coming bull run. Check your wallets, you have literally sitting free coins there. The biggest airdrop in history. Elon Musk and Richard Heart would make a great team! You want to be an early adopter? This one here is your chance. Perhaps a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

Richard Heart Has What Elon Musk Wants Elon wants high throughput low fees and no electricity waste? Richard has it! Richard built Pulsechain to make this world better. How so? Ethereum was great once, but is not so anymore. It suffers from extremely high gas fees. The network is totally overloaded and no longer an option for the little man. Richard has forked Ethereum, which means he has taken everything that is good about ETH and turned it into something better. Pulsechain is FASTER, greener, better for the environment, more decentralized and cheaper! Do you care about Freedom? -> Pulsechain. Do you care about Freedom of Speech? -> Pulsechain Do you care about the environment? -> Pulsechain Do you care about saving money? -> Pulsechain Do you care about price performance? -> Pulsechain Do you care about decentralization? -> Pulsechain Bitcoin destroys the environment, because it's trying to maintain a secure network! This shit is dinosaur tech, it's old as the dawn of time and you are NOT an early adopter anymore. PulseChain is only a year old and it will change everyone's life in this coming bull run. Check your wallets, you have literally sitting free coins there. The biggest airdrop in history. Elon Musk and Richard Heart would make a great team! You want to be an early adopter? This one here is your chance. Perhaps a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

Grand Inquisitor Cicero

63,327 views • 2 years ago

Ethan Skolnick questions if it’s best for the Heat and Bam to move on from each other 👀 “Do we think the Bam Miami Heat relationship has run its course? Because I kind of think it has. Both ways. I don’t think he’s worth the salary to a team like that, that’s in the place they’re in. It’s too restrictive in allowing them to get the guy and on the same token I don’t think they serve his purpose anymore. I feel a parting would be best for both parties… Everybody thinks it’s Bam slander but I think it’s best for both parties. They get so tied up in the tradition stuff sometimes, it seems to be not so much about the winning but it’s about the lineage. Bam was next in the lineage like UD, Zo, Wade, all anointed him which is great and he deserves it but it’s like now we can’t trade him ever…. Is he wasting his prime years here? I think you can make the case. I don’t think he’d ever ask out but I do think a mutual parting of the ways. If you make the play in again this year, what are you doing? You have a $50M player, he can’t carry you, you’d love to have him but other teams can use him more and I don’t think you can build anything significant if he’s the other attraction” (Via Ethan J. Skolnick, 5 Reasons Sports / Bryan Fonseca 🇵🇷)

Ethan Skolnick questions if it’s best for the Heat and Bam to move on from each other 👀 “Do we think the Bam Miami Heat relationship has run its course? Because I kind of think it has. Both ways. I don’t think he’s worth the salary to a team like that, that’s in the place they’re in. It’s too restrictive in allowing them to get the guy and on the same token I don’t think they serve his purpose anymore. I feel a parting would be best for both parties… Everybody thinks it’s Bam slander but I think it’s best for both parties. They get so tied up in the tradition stuff sometimes, it seems to be not so much about the winning but it’s about the lineage. Bam was next in the lineage like UD, Zo, Wade, all anointed him which is great and he deserves it but it’s like now we can’t trade him ever…. Is he wasting his prime years here? I think you can make the case. I don’t think he’d ever ask out but I do think a mutual parting of the ways. If you make the play in again this year, what are you doing? You have a $50M player, he can’t carry you, you’d love to have him but other teams can use him more and I don’t think you can build anything significant if he’s the other attraction” (Via Ethan J. Skolnick, 5 Reasons Sports / Bryan Fonseca 🇵🇷)

Heat Central

48,224 views • 6 months ago

Former NFL Linebacker Will Compton was PREACHING in this segment with Notre Dame Football about Creating Evidence. A must watch regardless of title, age, or industry: 👮‍♂️ You start with BELIEF, you stand on EVIDENCE. Facts don't care about feelings. When you get there, nobody cares HOW you got there, they care about how you can HELP. 👨‍⚖️ One Rep ➡️ One Day ➡️ One Week ➡️ One Game ➡️ One Year. At the end of the year, you're graded and judged by the evidence of your WORK. Evidence doesn't just arrive, it's acquired and accumulated everyday. It’s never one moment, it’s the accumulation of all of them. 🏷️ Let Proof Override Labels. Creating Evidence isn't about running from the truth, it's about creating so much proof that past labels become irrelevant. 🧵 Everything matters. Every rep has meaning. Even when you can't see it. Too tired, too emotional, too worn out to see or hear it, but it still means something. So you must TIE meaning to it. The smallest action either adds to your case or subtracts from it, tie purpose to all of it. 🖋️ Facts are permanent, but they do not define who you are, or who you have to be in the future. The truth is the starting point, not the ceiling. Face it, use it, and build forward, the obstacle is the way.

Former NFL Linebacker Will Compton was PREACHING in this segment with Notre Dame Football about Creating Evidence. A must watch regardless of title, age, or industry: 👮‍♂️ You start with BELIEF, you stand on EVIDENCE. Facts don't care about feelings. When you get there, nobody cares HOW you got there, they care about how you can HELP. 👨‍⚖️ One Rep ➡️ One Day ➡️ One Week ➡️ One Game ➡️ One Year. At the end of the year, you're graded and judged by the evidence of your WORK. Evidence doesn't just arrive, it's acquired and accumulated everyday. It’s never one moment, it’s the accumulation of all of them. 🏷️ Let Proof Override Labels. Creating Evidence isn't about running from the truth, it's about creating so much proof that past labels become irrelevant. 🧵 Everything matters. Every rep has meaning. Even when you can't see it. Too tired, too emotional, too worn out to see or hear it, but it still means something. So you must TIE meaning to it. The smallest action either adds to your case or subtracts from it, tie purpose to all of it. 🖋️ Facts are permanent, but they do not define who you are, or who you have to be in the future. The truth is the starting point, not the ceiling. Face it, use it, and build forward, the obstacle is the way.

Josh Chambers

369,387 views • 4 months ago

🚨 OMG. Democrat Fairfax prosecutor who released a child sexual predator just got NUKED FROM ORBIT by Rep. Brad Knott "Be QUIET!" "He yanked a 4 YEAR OLD GIRL out of her BED with the intent to harm her, you wanted to CAP him at 2 YEARS! Then when the plea agreement was rejected, WHAT DID YOU DO?" "He walks free. A DISGUSTING, PERVERTED individual preying on children, you dismissed the case!" "I've prosecuted cases, when you EVADE like that, that's a sign of GUILT!" "You dismissed the CASE!" "As the father of 2 young girls, one of which is 5, that is as SHAMEFUL as anything I have ever seen." DESCANO: I have a daughter too! Don't talk to me that I don't care about people in my community. KNOTT: "You clearly DON'T! You dismissed the case, and it's SHAMEFUL. You're a COWARD!" Now hold them criminally liable!

🚨 OMG. Democrat Fairfax prosecutor who released a child sexual predator just got NUKED FROM ORBIT by Rep. Brad Knott "Be QUIET!" "He yanked a 4 YEAR OLD GIRL out of her BED with the intent to harm her, you wanted to CAP him at 2 YEARS! Then when the plea agreement was rejected, WHAT DID YOU DO?" "He walks free. A DISGUSTING, PERVERTED individual preying on children, you dismissed the case!" "I've prosecuted cases, when you EVADE like that, that's a sign of GUILT!" "You dismissed the CASE!" "As the father of 2 young girls, one of which is 5, that is as SHAMEFUL as anything I have ever seen." DESCANO: I have a daughter too! Don't talk to me that I don't care about people in my community. KNOTT: "You clearly DON'T! You dismissed the case, and it's SHAMEFUL. You're a COWARD!" Now hold them criminally liable!

Eric Daugherty

1,236,765 views • 3 months ago

🚨 OMG. Democrat Fairfax prosecutor who released a child sexual predator just got NUKED FROM ORBIT by Rep. Brad Knott "Be QUIET!" "He yanked a 4 YEAR OLD GIRL out of her BED with the intent to harm her, you wanted to CAP him at 2 YEARS! Then when the plea agreement was rejected, WHAT DID YOU DO?" "He walks free. A DISGUSTING, PERVERTED individual preying on children, you dismissed the case!" "I've prosecuted cases, when you EVADE like that, that's a sign of GUILT!" "You dismissed the CASE!" "As the father of 2 young girls, one of which is 5, that is as SHAMEFUL as anything I have ever seen." DESCANO: I have a daughter too! Don't talk to me that I don't care about people in my community. KNOTT: "You clearly DON'T! You dismissed the case, and it's SHAMEFUL. You're a COWARD!" Now hold them criminally liable!

🚨 OMG. Democrat Fairfax prosecutor who released a child sexual predator just got NUKED FROM ORBIT by Rep. Brad Knott "Be QUIET!" "He yanked a 4 YEAR OLD GIRL out of her BED with the intent to harm her, you wanted to CAP him at 2 YEARS! Then when the plea agreement was rejected, WHAT DID YOU DO?" "He walks free. A DISGUSTING, PERVERTED individual preying on children, you dismissed the case!" "I've prosecuted cases, when you EVADE like that, that's a sign of GUILT!" "You dismissed the CASE!" "As the father of 2 young girls, one of which is 5, that is as SHAMEFUL as anything I have ever seen." DESCANO: I have a daughter too! Don't talk to me that I don't care about people in my community. KNOTT: "You clearly DON'T! You dismissed the case, and it's SHAMEFUL. You're a COWARD!" Now hold them criminally liable!

QUANTUM GUARD ™️

364,581 views • 1 month ago

WHO WILL DO BEST IN 2026? 🔮 2026 isn't just one year; it’s two different games. The rules change in mid-February. If you don't switch strategies then, you will get left behind Here is the official breakdown: PART 1: THE CLOSING (JAN 1 - FEB 16) Completing the Year of the Snake ✅ BEST: SNAKE ROOSTER OX ❌ WORST: PIGS PART 2: THE FIRE HORSE (FEB 17) The energy shifts from "Planning" to "Speed" ✅ BEST: HORSE (Main character energy) DOG (Massive support system) TIGER (Aggressive expansion) ❌ WORST:RATS (The Horse opposes you. Avoid big risks.) NUMEROLOGY CHEAT CODE2026 is a Universal Year 1. It favors leaders and starters. WHO WINS?• LIFE PATH 1 • LIFE PATH 11 (Master Number) • People born on the 28th (The "Wealth Leader" birthday) I did a full deep-dive video on this explaining exactly how to play your hand this year. Reply with "2026" and I'll send you the full breakdown. 👇

WHO WILL DO BEST IN 2026? 🔮 2026 isn't just one year; it’s two different games. The rules change in mid-February. If you don't switch strategies then, you will get left behind Here is the official breakdown: PART 1: THE CLOSING (JAN 1 - FEB 16) Completing the Year of the Snake ✅ BEST: SNAKE ROOSTER OX ❌ WORST: PIGS PART 2: THE FIRE HORSE (FEB 17) The energy shifts from "Planning" to "Speed" ✅ BEST: HORSE (Main character energy) DOG (Massive support system) TIGER (Aggressive expansion) ❌ WORST:RATS (The Horse opposes you. Avoid big risks.) NUMEROLOGY CHEAT CODE2026 is a Universal Year 1. It favors leaders and starters. WHO WINS?• LIFE PATH 1 • LIFE PATH 11 (Master Number) • People born on the 28th (The "Wealth Leader" birthday) I did a full deep-dive video on this explaining exactly how to play your hand this year. Reply with "2026" and I'll send you the full breakdown. 👇

Run It Up $$$

19,869 views • 7 months ago

🚨 LET'S GO! TEXAS KEEPS FIGHTING BACK! "8-YEAR-OLD GIRLS FORCED TO MARRY 60-YEAR-OLD MEN" - FRISCO RESIDENT TO CITY COUNCIL: "REJECT THE MOSQUE - THINK OF YOUR DAUGHTERS & GRANDDAUGHTERS!" Frisco resident Jose Duarte spoke for the majority at the City Council meeting on the proposed Islamic Center of Quad Cities mega-mosque: “I’m here because I reject, and the majority here rejects, the construction of this mosque. In a democracy, the majority rules. It’s as simple as that. Reject the proposal.” He turned to the politicians: “You’re humans too. You have daughters and granddaughters. In the Quran, two women equal one man in court, a woman is less valuable. Imagine your girls finding out you promoted something that steps on women’s rights worldwide. In Islamic countries, 8-year-old girls are forced to marry 60-year-old men, raped, and their families do nothing because the religion approves it.” On terror and Taqiyyah: “Muslims won’t condemn Hamas, Hezbollah, or the Taliban, they killed thousands of our soldiers. If they do, it’s Taqiyyah, lying to protect Islam.” He closed strong: “Islam claims to be peace, yet leaving it means death. Jesus Christ is God and the only God. The majority has the last word we, the people, reject this proposal.” Frisco says NO. The majority has spoken.

🚨 LET'S GO! TEXAS KEEPS FIGHTING BACK! "8-YEAR-OLD GIRLS FORCED TO MARRY 60-YEAR-OLD MEN" - FRISCO RESIDENT TO CITY COUNCIL: "REJECT THE MOSQUE - THINK OF YOUR DAUGHTERS & GRANDDAUGHTERS!" Frisco resident Jose Duarte spoke for the majority at the City Council meeting on the proposed Islamic Center of Quad Cities mega-mosque: “I’m here because I reject, and the majority here rejects, the construction of this mosque. In a democracy, the majority rules. It’s as simple as that. Reject the proposal.” He turned to the politicians: “You’re humans too. You have daughters and granddaughters. In the Quran, two women equal one man in court, a woman is less valuable. Imagine your girls finding out you promoted something that steps on women’s rights worldwide. In Islamic countries, 8-year-old girls are forced to marry 60-year-old men, raped, and their families do nothing because the religion approves it.” On terror and Taqiyyah: “Muslims won’t condemn Hamas, Hezbollah, or the Taliban, they killed thousands of our soldiers. If they do, it’s Taqiyyah, lying to protect Islam.” He closed strong: “Islam claims to be peace, yet leaving it means death. Jesus Christ is God and the only God. The majority has the last word we, the people, reject this proposal.” Frisco says NO. The majority has spoken.

Amy Mek

81,454 views • 2 months ago

"I know almost everybody who loves movies loves 'Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas' (1999). I know people on the technical side, musicians & people from a generation that isn’t in denial love it, & there are these 14-year-old kids from high school who love it." — Terry Gilliam Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: You think today’s audience is corrupted by simple storylines, structured in three acts with strong motivation, just like the screenwriting manuals teach? Gilliam: Exactly. Interviewer: Whereas complexity your natural instinct is to construct as you can get away with . . Gilliam: I no longer know who does and doesn’t like my work. I’m confused. I know almost everybody who loves movies loves 'Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas' (1999). I know people on the technical side and musicians love it, and people from a generation that isn’t in denial love it, and there are these fourteen-year-old kids from high school who love it. I’m trying to corrupt youth in my own way, not in Spielberg’s: mine is a Socratic corruption. It’s been interesting to see kids write on the Web, This is the best movie I’ve ever seen.’ Interviewer: Kids who didn’t previously know the book? Gilliam: Yes, and now the book is back in the bestseller lists. I seem to make movies to get people to read books. I was hoping they would do this with 'Raspe' and 'Munchausen', but I think I’ve finally succeeded on this one. There must be a new generation who need to see that you can do these things. I met a really bright fourteen-year-old girl in New York who said that all her friends in high school were sneaking in to see it, even though it’s R-rated, and loving it. One fifteen-year-old said, when asked why he rated it so highly, ‘Because it’s honest.’ Perhaps the kids can see through the hypocrisy that currently clothes the American empire. In the end, I think it’ll be a grass-roots thing, but the way it was first released - going into 1,100 cinemas and sold as a romp - was just wrong." ('Gilliam on Gilliam', edited by Ian Christie, 1999)

"I know almost everybody who loves movies loves 'Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas' (1999). I know people on the technical side, musicians & people from a generation that isn’t in denial love it, & there are these 14-year-old kids from high school who love it." — Terry Gilliam Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: You think today’s audience is corrupted by simple storylines, structured in three acts with strong motivation, just like the screenwriting manuals teach? Gilliam: Exactly. Interviewer: Whereas complexity your natural instinct is to construct as you can get away with . . Gilliam: I no longer know who does and doesn’t like my work. I’m confused. I know almost everybody who loves movies loves 'Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas' (1999). I know people on the technical side and musicians love it, and people from a generation that isn’t in denial love it, and there are these fourteen-year-old kids from high school who love it. I’m trying to corrupt youth in my own way, not in Spielberg’s: mine is a Socratic corruption. It’s been interesting to see kids write on the Web, This is the best movie I’ve ever seen.’ Interviewer: Kids who didn’t previously know the book? Gilliam: Yes, and now the book is back in the bestseller lists. I seem to make movies to get people to read books. I was hoping they would do this with 'Raspe' and 'Munchausen', but I think I’ve finally succeeded on this one. There must be a new generation who need to see that you can do these things. I met a really bright fourteen-year-old girl in New York who said that all her friends in high school were sneaking in to see it, even though it’s R-rated, and loving it. One fifteen-year-old said, when asked why he rated it so highly, ‘Because it’s honest.’ Perhaps the kids can see through the hypocrisy that currently clothes the American empire. In the end, I think it’ll be a grass-roots thing, but the way it was first released - going into 1,100 cinemas and sold as a romp - was just wrong." ('Gilliam on Gilliam', edited by Ian Christie, 1999)

DepressedBergman

25,685 views • 6 months ago

🚨 “WHAT THE F*CK IS GOING ON?” — KATIE COURIC WARNS 17 CANCERS ARE SKYROCKETING… AND NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN WHY Katie Couric says doctors are now seeing something they can’t ignore: • A 21-year-old with stage 4 colorectal cancer — no family history • Patients in their 20s, 30s, 40s being diagnosed late… already metastatic • 17 different cancers increasing among people under 50 And even specialists are struggling to explain it. Possible factors being discussed: • Ultra-processed food • Microplastics + “forever chemicals” • Antibiotic overuse • Environmental exposure Couric: “It’s not just lifestyle… something is going on.” And the most unsettling part? Many cases are being caught too late. So what changed? What do you think is actually behind this spike?

🚨 “WHAT THE F*CK IS GOING ON?” — KATIE COURIC WARNS 17 CANCERS ARE SKYROCKETING… AND NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN WHY Katie Couric says doctors are now seeing something they can’t ignore: • A 21-year-old with stage 4 colorectal cancer — no family history • Patients in their 20s, 30s, 40s being diagnosed late… already metastatic • 17 different cancers increasing among people under 50 And even specialists are struggling to explain it. Possible factors being discussed: • Ultra-processed food • Microplastics + “forever chemicals” • Antibiotic overuse • Environmental exposure Couric: “It’s not just lifestyle… something is going on.” And the most unsettling part? Many cases are being caught too late. So what changed? What do you think is actually behind this spike?

HustleBitch

2,049,771 views • 4 months ago

Patrick Bet-David Noticing Some Amazing Coincidences With These College Protests, Things Like Both Election Year Protests started around the same time: The George Floyd BLM riots happened in May 2020 Now in May 2024, College Protests are happening The media is repeating the exact same lines, “If one student dies” David “If one student dies, it's as if they want this” “The date is May 26th, you can Google this, 2020, when George Floyd died and all they needed was a story like that. They need chaos. Today is May 2nd. We are roughly a little over three weeks away from that date with George Floyd.” Now Breaking Down The Money Trail: Do you know what percentage of the revenue that Harvard got in their endowment in 2021 came from actual tuition of students trying to get a degree from Harvard? Tuition, degree, Harvard. What do you think it is? A lot of people say, well, $60,000, $70,000 a year. $80,000, that's how they make their money. Really? Only 10% of their endowment came from actually doing their job, educating students. Do you know 39% came from donations? Do you know 10% came from gifts? Do you know nearly 49% of the money Harvard got in 2021 is from donations and gifts? Only 10% is from students. So let me ask you a question. Let's paint a picture here. Let's just say, let's just say the professor of Harvard, the dean, the president of Harvard, of Columbia, their assistant says, Mr. President, we have two people waiting for you on hold. Line one is, your number one student's parents. How much money did they give us last year? I think outside of the tuition, around $300,000. Who's on line two? George Soros. Oh, oh, tell Mr. Jackson, the number one student's parents, I'll call him back. Please put Mr. Soros through. Hello, Mr. Soros. How can we help you? Oh, because you gave so much money and da-da-da-da-da and all these other endowment money being given to them. FYI, let me go a little bit deeper for you. Do you know China, since 2019, 2018, they've given roughly $400 million to universities in America. Do you know what university they gave the most money to? 70 million went to Harvard. Who's Harvard's number one customer? Students? Or these people that are giving massive donations to them, who's their number one customer? It's very strange when you sit there and you ask yourself, why are they doing nothing about it? Why are they okay with Palestine flags going up and not America's flag going up? It's because we're not asking the right question. The moment we find out who the number one customer is, that gives the most money, it gives you a lot of perspective to realize, if you ran A, you do construction, you're a general contractor. You have two clients. One of them gave you $50 million of business to big buildings last year. The other one gave you $10 million. Which client is more important to you? So why are people confused? These professors, these professors that we're all trusting our kids with who hate America, we're supposed to spend that kind of money and send our kids there that are being controlled by the people that are giving the donations who hate America, and we're supposed to be okay with that. Yeah, I think we're naive. I think we need to start exposing and talking about some of this stuff. I'm going to put the link below for you to watch. But I wonder. Who do you think, from all the stuff that I just said to you, who do you think is their number one customer? You? The students? The parents? Or those people that are giving the most donation to these guys? I don't think it's a tough question to ask, but I want to ask you, what do you think? Comment below.” This is a summary of what’s being said, there’s much more good details in the video.

Patrick Bet-David Noticing Some Amazing Coincidences With These College Protests, Things Like Both Election Year Protests started around the same time: The George Floyd BLM riots happened in May 2020 Now in May 2024, College Protests are happening The media is repeating the exact same lines, “If one student dies” David “If one student dies, it's as if they want this” “The date is May 26th, you can Google this, 2020, when George Floyd died and all they needed was a story like that. They need chaos. Today is May 2nd. We are roughly a little over three weeks away from that date with George Floyd.” Now Breaking Down The Money Trail: Do you know what percentage of the revenue that Harvard got in their endowment in 2021 came from actual tuition of students trying to get a degree from Harvard? Tuition, degree, Harvard. What do you think it is? A lot of people say, well, $60,000, $70,000 a year. $80,000, that's how they make their money. Really? Only 10% of their endowment came from actually doing their job, educating students. Do you know 39% came from donations? Do you know 10% came from gifts? Do you know nearly 49% of the money Harvard got in 2021 is from donations and gifts? Only 10% is from students. So let me ask you a question. Let's paint a picture here. Let's just say, let's just say the professor of Harvard, the dean, the president of Harvard, of Columbia, their assistant says, Mr. President, we have two people waiting for you on hold. Line one is, your number one student's parents. How much money did they give us last year? I think outside of the tuition, around $300,000. Who's on line two? George Soros. Oh, oh, tell Mr. Jackson, the number one student's parents, I'll call him back. Please put Mr. Soros through. Hello, Mr. Soros. How can we help you? Oh, because you gave so much money and da-da-da-da-da and all these other endowment money being given to them. FYI, let me go a little bit deeper for you. Do you know China, since 2019, 2018, they've given roughly $400 million to universities in America. Do you know what university they gave the most money to? 70 million went to Harvard. Who's Harvard's number one customer? Students? Or these people that are giving massive donations to them, who's their number one customer? It's very strange when you sit there and you ask yourself, why are they doing nothing about it? Why are they okay with Palestine flags going up and not America's flag going up? It's because we're not asking the right question. The moment we find out who the number one customer is, that gives the most money, it gives you a lot of perspective to realize, if you ran A, you do construction, you're a general contractor. You have two clients. One of them gave you $50 million of business to big buildings last year. The other one gave you $10 million. Which client is more important to you? So why are people confused? These professors, these professors that we're all trusting our kids with who hate America, we're supposed to spend that kind of money and send our kids there that are being controlled by the people that are giving the donations who hate America, and we're supposed to be okay with that. Yeah, I think we're naive. I think we need to start exposing and talking about some of this stuff. I'm going to put the link below for you to watch. But I wonder. Who do you think, from all the stuff that I just said to you, who do you think is their number one customer? You? The students? The parents? Or those people that are giving the most donation to these guys? I don't think it's a tough question to ask, but I want to ask you, what do you think? Comment below.” This is a summary of what’s being said, there’s much more good details in the video.

Wall Street Apes

1,115,624 views • 2 years ago

Scientists just figured out how to reverse aging using AI. And this is a massive breakthrough. We can now reprogram any human cell back to age 20. Heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, all reset to their biological prime. And here’s the wildest part…the technology to do this, has already existed since 2012 (it won the Nobel Prize). But the real breakthrough wasn’t possible until this year, when they supercharged it with AI. It’s a wild story. So in 2006, scientists discovered Yamanaka factors. They’re proteins that can basically convert any normal cell into a universal stem cell. Now this was a huge deal, because these stem cells are basically like magic healers. If you have torn muscle tissue, you could inject these stem cells into the area and they will turn into the youthful muscle cells you need. So Yamanaka factors were this insane breakthrough, because they allowed any human to turn any cell you already have into these magic healers. But, there was one big problem… It turns out, the original Yamanaka factors weren’t very good at this stem cell conversion. They could do it, but they just weren’t very reliable. Enter OpenAI...and this is where things get crazy. OpenAI designed a special AI model built specifically to create new proteins. Think of it like ChatGPT but for protein engineering. So they took all the Yamanaka research and asked this new AI to go ham on improving it. And get this… Their version was 50x more effective than the original. They tested it on 50 year old cells and it successfully started repairing 30% of their cells in just 7 days. This is just science fiction…it actually happened. And it sounds crazy, but in a few years, humans will be able to take a shot that will literally reverse the age of their cells.

Scientists just figured out how to reverse aging using AI. And this is a massive breakthrough. We can now reprogram any human cell back to age 20. Heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, all reset to their biological prime. And here’s the wildest part…the technology to do this, has already existed since 2012 (it won the Nobel Prize). But the real breakthrough wasn’t possible until this year, when they supercharged it with AI. It’s a wild story. So in 2006, scientists discovered Yamanaka factors. They’re proteins that can basically convert any normal cell into a universal stem cell. Now this was a huge deal, because these stem cells are basically like magic healers. If you have torn muscle tissue, you could inject these stem cells into the area and they will turn into the youthful muscle cells you need. So Yamanaka factors were this insane breakthrough, because they allowed any human to turn any cell you already have into these magic healers. But, there was one big problem… It turns out, the original Yamanaka factors weren’t very good at this stem cell conversion. They could do it, but they just weren’t very reliable. Enter OpenAI...and this is where things get crazy. OpenAI designed a special AI model built specifically to create new proteins. Think of it like ChatGPT but for protein engineering. So they took all the Yamanaka research and asked this new AI to go ham on improving it. And get this… Their version was 50x more effective than the original. They tested it on 50 year old cells and it successfully started repairing 30% of their cells in just 7 days. This is just science fiction…it actually happened. And it sounds crazy, but in a few years, humans will be able to take a shot that will literally reverse the age of their cells.

Whiplash347

68,643 views • 9 months ago