Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Space Bunny Alpha mogged by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 🐳 We asked both to build Minecraft in one HTML file and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash made a forest biome you can walk and dig in while Space Bunny Alpha's ground has holes showing the sky Run AI models locally ->

atomic.chat

17,194 subscribers

44,204 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Gaming Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash made DOOM in Atomic Chat 🐳 DeepSeek dropped a new architecture for the flash model so we tested it by making Doom in an html file and it built a real raycasting shooter with gun mechanics and enemy waves Run AI models locally ->

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash made DOOM in Atomic Chat 🐳 DeepSeek dropped a new architecture for the flash model so we tested it by making Doom in an html file and it built a real raycasting shooter with gun mechanics and enemy waves Run AI models locally ->

atomic.chat

29,435 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Union Alpha lost to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash running locally on 2 DGX Sparks 🐳 DeepSeek v4.1 Flash beat Union Alpha, which is supposed to deliver frontier level performance, though real tasks show a completely different story Run AI models locally ->

Union Alpha lost to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash running locally on 2 DGX Sparks 🐳 DeepSeek v4.1 Flash beat Union Alpha, which is supposed to deliver frontier level performance, though real tasks show a completely different story Run AI models locally ->

atomic.chat

79,324 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

i just compared DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash against Opus 5 gave same prompt to both models to build ocean sandbox using three.js DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash was almost 90% cheaper and 50% faster than Opus 5 💀 maybe the benchmarks are not broken.. do you think DeepSeek is better?

i just compared DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash against Opus 5 gave same prompt to both models to build ocean sandbox using three.js DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash was almost 90% cheaper and 50% faster than Opus 5 💀 maybe the benchmarks are not broken.. do you think DeepSeek is better?

Tim Jayas

28,561 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

🚨 You can use GPT-6 Astra as the orchestrator and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash as the agents to cut costs by more than 88% while maintaining the same level of quality. And now it’s even better, since DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is one of the best models for cybersecurity at an incredibly low price

🚨 You can use GPT-6 Astra as the orchestrator and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash as the agents to cut costs by more than 88% while maintaining the same level of quality. And now it’s even better, since DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is one of the best models for cybersecurity at an incredibly low price

Iam_

32,627 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!

thehype.

62,603 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Fly plays Crossy Road by DeepSeek V4.1-Flash 🪰🐔 We ran 668 neurons from a real fruit fly brain on a MacBook, its walking neurons decide when it hops and its escape neuron makes it jump when a car looms Run AI models locally ->

Fly plays Crossy Road by DeepSeek V4.1-Flash 🪰🐔 We ran 668 neurons from a real fruit fly brain on a MacBook, its walking neurons decide when it hops and its escape neuron makes it jump when a car looms Run AI models locally ->

atomic.chat

13,974 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

I've asked Astra to read the DeepSeek v4.1 Flash paper and compare it to the original Transformer architecture in 3D - you can zoom in an inspect each element side by side. Things have changed quite a bit. Try yourself:

I've asked Astra to read the DeepSeek v4.1 Flash paper and compare it to the original Transformer architecture in 3D - you can zoom in an inspect each element side by side. Things have changed quite a bit. Try yourself:

Peter Gostev

275,333 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

deepseek v4.1 flash vs secret model tested both with the same prompt at the highest reasoning available > v4.1 flash took 2 hours to finish both tests and cost $2.60 > secret model finished both in 30 minutes, can’t reveal cost yet v4.1 flash spent a lot of time overthinking and running random tests, which slowed it down thanks AIHubmix for providing api access so i could test v4.1 flash hoping that team will cut down the overthinking before the full release, but for now here are the results which model did better here?

deepseek v4.1 flash vs secret model tested both with the same prompt at the highest reasoning available > v4.1 flash took 2 hours to finish both tests and cost $2.60 > secret model finished both in 30 minutes, can’t reveal cost yet v4.1 flash spent a lot of time overthinking and running random tests, which slowed it down thanks AIHubmix for providing api access so i could test v4.1 flash hoping that team will cut down the overthinking before the full release, but for now here are the results which model did better here?

J A Z I I

29,132 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

this is f**king insane I was burning $100 in a single night running AI agents before this. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs ~1/70th of Astra, and someone figured out how to make Astra orchestrate while Flash does almost all the work. [it takes 3 mins to set up — here is how] 1. install `codex-router` 2. connect DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3. paste the routing prompt voila. Astra thinks. Flash executes. ~$50/month instead of burning hundreds on frontier models. save this and give it to your agent now 👇

this is f**king insane I was burning $100 in a single night running AI agents before this. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs ~1/70th of Astra, and someone figured out how to make Astra orchestrate while Flash does almost all the work. [it takes 3 mins to set up — here is how] 1. install `codex-router` 2. connect DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3. paste the routing prompt voila. Astra thinks. Flash executes. ~$50/month instead of burning hundreds on frontier models. save this and give it to your agent now 👇

Rahul

380,790 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3 This is not one-shot from DeepSeek btw. The first result was boxy and not realistic, so I iterated with a $6 cap. Kimi did this in one shot, costing $6.95. Not as good as Kimi K3, but it did better than the other Flash models I’ve tried.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3 This is not one-shot from DeepSeek btw. The first result was boxy and not realistic, so I iterated with a $6 cap. Kimi did this in one shot, costing $6.95. Not as good as Kimi K3, but it did better than the other Flash models I’ve tried.

Bhavy☄️

34,313 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

deepseek-v4.1-flash I'm really curious to understand the architecture behind the scenes. 🤔 Model is really fast as you can see in the video! I've got an average decoding speed of around 350 t/s. BTW it is clearly experimental and: - currently, the model is under heavy load and failing quite often. - it thinks like there is not tomorrow - it keeps failing editing file - after 4M tokens my frogger game is still in progress - it can't see images out of the box on DeepSeek Harness, you have to add these config lines - id: deepseek-v4.1-flash-expires-on-0910 name: deepseek-v4.1-flash-expires-on-0910 contextWindow: 1000000 inputModalities: - text - image imagePixelBudget: 640000 imageMaxBytes: 1048576 So play with it, but be aware of the very early stage.

deepseek-v4.1-flash I'm really curious to understand the architecture behind the scenes. 🤔 Model is really fast as you can see in the video! I've got an average decoding speed of around 350 t/s. BTW it is clearly experimental and: - currently, the model is under heavy load and failing quite often. - it thinks like there is not tomorrow - it keeps failing editing file - after 4M tokens my frogger game is still in progress - it can't see images out of the box on DeepSeek Harness, you have to add these config lines - id: deepseek-v4.1-flash-expires-on-0910 name: deepseek-v4.1-flash-expires-on-0910 contextWindow: 1000000 inputModalities: - text - image imagePixelBudget: 640000 imageMaxBytes: 1048576 So play with it, but be aware of the very early stage.

Ivan Fioravanti

27,938 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash at 3D geometry test: six self-contained three.js stereometry scenes — a (3,8) torus knot, a Klein bottle, a great stellated dodecahedron, a hyperboloid ruled by 120 straight rods, a level-3 Menger sponge, a thick Möbius strip. one shot each, no libraries beyond three.js, every surface painted with a live iridescent rainbow that has to crawl across the geometry. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — $0.27 • gemini delivers all six figures for 2.4× less — 21k output tokens against deepseek's 168k • gemini is 5× faster — every scene under 25 seconds, deepseek took up to 3 minutes on the Möbius strip • deepseek wins the torus knot: its rope is vivid and glossy, while gemini rendered the same knot nearly black • neither model can build a real Klein bottle. both hand back a twisted tube and call it done try both on aimlapi[.]com

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash at 3D geometry test: six self-contained three.js stereometry scenes — a (3,8) torus knot, a Klein bottle, a great stellated dodecahedron, a hyperboloid ruled by 120 straight rods, a level-3 Menger sponge, a thick Möbius strip. one shot each, no libraries beyond three.js, every surface painted with a live iridescent rainbow that has to crawl across the geometry. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — $0.27 • gemini delivers all six figures for 2.4× less — 21k output tokens against deepseek's 168k • gemini is 5× faster — every scene under 25 seconds, deepseek took up to 3 minutes on the Möbius strip • deepseek wins the torus knot: its rope is vivid and glossy, while gemini rendered the same knot nearly black • neither model can build a real Klein bottle. both hand back a twisted tube and call it done try both on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

39,857 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

what the hell did this free stealth model just build 💀 I asked Space Bunny, a Flash-level model, to make Minecraft in one HTML file and left it running it came back with a playable survival game inside my browser I could explore the generated world, break and place blocks, and switch items through the hotbar easily the best result I have got from a coding model on this test Space Bunny is free on OpenCode for the next week prompt below:

what the hell did this free stealth model just build 💀 I asked Space Bunny, a Flash-level model, to make Minecraft in one HTML file and left it running it came back with a playable survival game inside my browser I could explore the generated world, break and place blocks, and switch items through the hotbar easily the best result I have got from a coding model on this test Space Bunny is free on OpenCode for the next week prompt below:

Israfil

37,411 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

union alpha (unbiased pareto) vs deepseek v4.1 flash vs muse spark 1.3 – three paintings in three.js the setup: one four-line prompt plus the painting as an image, through OpenRouter. no agent loop, no renders, no feedback – the model writes one html file blind and we open it. Three.js from a cdn, every texture generated in code. when a provider cut the stream early we sent the partial back and said continue exactly where you stopped tasks: 1. the starry night – van gogh, 1889 2. the persistence of memory – dalí, 1931 3. poppies at argenteuil – monet, 1873 two rules in every brief: keep the painting's palette, brushwork and mood, and reply with the code only models: Unbiased AI union alpha (stealth, free), DeepSeek deepseek v4.1 flash, AI at Meta muse spark 1.3 total cost, three scenes #1 union alpha – free (list price: $1.04) #2 muse spark 1.3 – $0.117 #3 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.162 generation time, three scenes #1 muse spark 1.3 – 4m 45s #2 deepseek v4.1 flash – 11m 30s #3 union alpha – 29m 13s total completion tokens #1 muse spark 1.3 – 26,502 #2 union alpha – 123,756 #3 deepseek v4.1 flash – 156,028 lines of code shipped #1 muse spark 1.3 – 862 #2 union alpha – 1,715 #3 deepseek v4.1 flash – 2,816 observations: • union alpha reads the painting like an art historian. it named every work unprompted, then broke each into parts: dalí's watches deformed along a bezier curve, monet's poppies as instanced brush dabs under a wind shader. no other model went that deep on a one-shot • it is the only model that made the paintings move the way they were painted. in the monet, the woman and the child walk the field on catmull-rom paths, pollen drifts, poppies are brush dabs in a point shader that sway in the wind. deepseek and muse left the figures standing • its dalí is an inventory of the canvas: three soft clocks draped along one parametric curve, a drip falling off the hanging one, a fly, ants on the pocket watch as an instanced mesh. 17 named parts in all. nobody else drew the drip • its starry night is shader work end to end: shared glsl noise, a vortex field for the sky, billboarded shader quads for the moon and stars, a painterly surface shader for the hills, and windows that flicker on their own timers. the file reads like a demoscene entry, not a model output what union alpha is: • we asked it. the stealth window had closed a day after launch and the api answered: "this model was unbiased's pareto". pareto is from circuit & chisel, an ex-stripe team that raised $19.2m in sep 2025 per fortune, and now sells "frontier intelligence for 75% less" • pareto is not one model. per unbiased's site it "runs a mix of frontier and open source models against each other on every request" and keeps the best answer. that is the 300-second first token, the tokenizer listed as "other", and the missing reasoning field – a race, not a model • listed at $2.50 in and $7.50 out per million. our three scenes would have cost $1.04 – 6.4x deepseek, 8.9x muse. asked for its cutoff, it dated nothing past may 2025 follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

union alpha (unbiased pareto) vs deepseek v4.1 flash vs muse spark 1.3 – three paintings in three.js the setup: one four-line prompt plus the painting as an image, through OpenRouter. no agent loop, no renders, no feedback – the model writes one html file blind and we open it. Three.js from a cdn, every texture generated in code. when a provider cut the stream early we sent the partial back and said continue exactly where you stopped tasks: 1. the starry night – van gogh, 1889 2. the persistence of memory – dalí, 1931 3. poppies at argenteuil – monet, 1873 two rules in every brief: keep the painting's palette, brushwork and mood, and reply with the code only models: Unbiased AI union alpha (stealth, free), DeepSeek deepseek v4.1 flash, AI at Meta muse spark 1.3 total cost, three scenes #1 union alpha – free (list price: $1.04) #2 muse spark 1.3 – $0.117 #3 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.162 generation time, three scenes #1 muse spark 1.3 – 4m 45s #2 deepseek v4.1 flash – 11m 30s #3 union alpha – 29m 13s total completion tokens #1 muse spark 1.3 – 26,502 #2 union alpha – 123,756 #3 deepseek v4.1 flash – 156,028 lines of code shipped #1 muse spark 1.3 – 862 #2 union alpha – 1,715 #3 deepseek v4.1 flash – 2,816 observations: • union alpha reads the painting like an art historian. it named every work unprompted, then broke each into parts: dalí's watches deformed along a bezier curve, monet's poppies as instanced brush dabs under a wind shader. no other model went that deep on a one-shot • it is the only model that made the paintings move the way they were painted. in the monet, the woman and the child walk the field on catmull-rom paths, pollen drifts, poppies are brush dabs in a point shader that sway in the wind. deepseek and muse left the figures standing • its dalí is an inventory of the canvas: three soft clocks draped along one parametric curve, a drip falling off the hanging one, a fly, ants on the pocket watch as an instanced mesh. 17 named parts in all. nobody else drew the drip • its starry night is shader work end to end: shared glsl noise, a vortex field for the sky, billboarded shader quads for the moon and stars, a painterly surface shader for the hills, and windows that flicker on their own timers. the file reads like a demoscene entry, not a model output what union alpha is: • we asked it. the stealth window had closed a day after launch and the api answered: "this model was unbiased's pareto". pareto is from circuit & chisel, an ex-stripe team that raised $19.2m in sep 2025 per fortune, and now sells "frontier intelligence for 75% less" • pareto is not one model. per unbiased's site it "runs a mix of frontier and open source models against each other on every request" and keeps the best answer. that is the 300-second first token, the tokenizer listed as "other", and the missing reasoning field – a race, not a model • listed at $2.50 in and $7.50 out per million. our three scenes would have cost $1.04 – 6.4x deepseek, 8.9x muse. asked for its cutoff, it dated nothing past may 2025 follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

23,145 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

We tested Ox Alpha in Pi and DeepSeek Harness. Same task for both: use ego lite to scope out a few great sites, then build the most impressive single-file HTML landing page. The gap was bigger than we expected 👇

We tested Ox Alpha in Pi and DeepSeek Harness. Same task for both: use ego lite to scope out a few great sites, then build the most impressive single-file HTML landing page. The gap was bigger than we expected 👇

ego

73,733 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

here’s how you can use DeepSeek V4.1 Flash completely FREE inside OpenCode. the setup takes less than 5 minutes. 1️⃣ first, download and install OpenCode from if you don’t already have it. 2️⃣ once it’s set up, head over to Token Harbor and sign in with your Gmail or GitHub account. 3️⃣ create a new API key and save it somewhere safe. 4️⃣ then go back to OpenCode and head to: Settings → Providers → Custom Model 5️⃣ fill in the details with: - Base URL: - API Key: paste the key you created earlier. add the model, save the setup, and you can start using DeepSeek V4.1 Flash directly inside OpenCode. the only catch: this free access is available for a limited time, so take advantage of it while it lasts.

here’s how you can use DeepSeek V4.1 Flash completely FREE inside OpenCode. the setup takes less than 5 minutes. 1️⃣ first, download and install OpenCode from if you don’t already have it. 2️⃣ once it’s set up, head over to Token Harbor and sign in with your Gmail or GitHub account. 3️⃣ create a new API key and save it somewhere safe. 4️⃣ then go back to OpenCode and head to: Settings → Providers → Custom Model 5️⃣ fill in the details with: - Base URL: - API Key: paste the key you created earlier. add the model, save the setup, and you can start using DeepSeek V4.1 Flash directly inside OpenCode. the only catch: this free access is available for a limited time, so take advantage of it while it lasts.

m0h

131,286 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Can you take the cheapest open model from a frontier lab & beat closed models on the hardest long range tasks? Yep Our open adaptive intelligence system Zenith ramps DeepSeek v4.1 Flash past GPT 5.6 Sol to the frontier 🚀 h/t Opus 5.5 for making the video in like 2 mins 😮‍💨

Can you take the cheapest open model from a frontier lab & beat closed models on the hardest long range tasks? Yep Our open adaptive intelligence system Zenith ramps DeepSeek v4.1 Flash past GPT 5.6 Sol to the frontier 🚀 h/t Opus 5.5 for making the video in like 2 mins 😮‍💨

Emad

30,687 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

New LFM2.5-2.6B hits DeepSeek-V4 level on tool calling and runs 3.7x faster! We ran Liquid AI 's new LFM2.5-2.6B against DeepSeek-V4-Flash on one box with 4x RTX 5090. Both got the same three jobs, and each one only completes if the model fires every tool call Topics: -weather and local time in six cities -one budget into six currencies -four hotels checked and booked for one date Outputs: LFM2.5-2.6B: 35/35 tool-calls, 366 tok/s, 19s DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 35/35 tool-calls, 77 tok/s, 70s Both models made all 35 calls, and both fired twelve of them in one turn. LFM was trained for agents, and tool calling is where that shows. Strong result for a model you can run right on your phone

New LFM2.5-2.6B hits DeepSeek-V4 level on tool calling and runs 3.7x faster! We ran Liquid AI 's new LFM2.5-2.6B against DeepSeek-V4-Flash on one box with 4x RTX 5090. Both got the same three jobs, and each one only completes if the model fires every tool call Topics: -weather and local time in six cities -one budget into six currencies -four hotels checked and booked for one date Outputs: LFM2.5-2.6B: 35/35 tool-calls, 366 tok/s, 19s DeepSeek-V4-Flash: 35/35 tool-calls, 77 tok/s, 70s Both models made all 35 calls, and both fired twelve of them in one turn. LFM was trained for agents, and tool calling is where that shows. Strong result for a model you can run right on your phone

atomic.chat

113,185 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ox alpha vs deepseek v4 flash vision vs grok 4.6 vs gemini 3.7 flash vs – on photo-to-3d four vision models got one photograph each and had to rebuild the place inside it as a Three.js scene. twelve scenes, twelve first-try runs, zero console errors the setup: one reference photo per scene, sent as an image on OpenRouter. the prompt never says what is in the picture – no "motel", no "bar", no "gas station". the model has to read the photo and rebuild it: layout, materials, hour of the day, and whatever is around the corner that the frame does not show tasks – three photographs of early-2000s america: 1. a motel at night, neon pylon lit, snow on the ground 2. an old new york tavern interior, tin ceiling, tiled floor 3. an abandoned service station in the california desert, midday sun each scene ships as one self-contained html file, procedural geometry and canvas textures only, no downloads. three timed camera shots, and shot 1 has to reproduce the framing of the reference photo models: xAI grok 4.6, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek deepseek v4 flash vision exp, and ox alpha – a stealth model on openrouter, free, no lab attached to it yet results: - wall clock, three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 11m 12s #2 deepseek v4 flash – 15m 20s #3 grok 4.6 – 28m 11s #4 ox alpha – 38m 54s - output tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 77,396 #2 ox alpha – 87,613 #3 grok 4.6 – 105,687 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 127,884 - lines of code shipped #1 ox alpha – 2,090 #2 deepseek v4 flash – 2,291 #3 grok 4.6 – 3,529 #4 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,989 - total price #1 ox alpha – $0.000 #2 deepseek v4 flash – $0.091 #3 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.136 #4 grok 4.6 – $0.697 observations: • grok is 7.7x the price of deepseek. it is the only model that read the light – low sun, real shadows on the station, a cold night on the motel • gemini is the fastest and the least deliberate. 17,158 reasoning tokens against deepseek's 99,172, and it still shipped the most code – 3,989 lines • deepseek thought hardest and rendered plainest. 99,172 reasoning tokens, 5.8x gemini's, spent on layout rather than on light. its motel is the second best in the set for $0.030 • ox alpha is free and reads a photo as well as anything here – it lifted "family units / kitchenettes" off the pylon and redrew it in canvas conclusion: twelve scenes, four models, zero fixes, and the whole run cost $0.924! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

ox alpha vs deepseek v4 flash vision vs grok 4.6 vs gemini 3.7 flash vs – on photo-to-3d four vision models got one photograph each and had to rebuild the place inside it as a Three.js scene. twelve scenes, twelve first-try runs, zero console errors the setup: one reference photo per scene, sent as an image on OpenRouter. the prompt never says what is in the picture – no "motel", no "bar", no "gas station". the model has to read the photo and rebuild it: layout, materials, hour of the day, and whatever is around the corner that the frame does not show tasks – three photographs of early-2000s america: 1. a motel at night, neon pylon lit, snow on the ground 2. an old new york tavern interior, tin ceiling, tiled floor 3. an abandoned service station in the california desert, midday sun each scene ships as one self-contained html file, procedural geometry and canvas textures only, no downloads. three timed camera shots, and shot 1 has to reproduce the framing of the reference photo models: xAI grok 4.6, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek deepseek v4 flash vision exp, and ox alpha – a stealth model on openrouter, free, no lab attached to it yet results: - wall clock, three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 11m 12s #2 deepseek v4 flash – 15m 20s #3 grok 4.6 – 28m 11s #4 ox alpha – 38m 54s - output tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 77,396 #2 ox alpha – 87,613 #3 grok 4.6 – 105,687 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 127,884 - lines of code shipped #1 ox alpha – 2,090 #2 deepseek v4 flash – 2,291 #3 grok 4.6 – 3,529 #4 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,989 - total price #1 ox alpha – $0.000 #2 deepseek v4 flash – $0.091 #3 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.136 #4 grok 4.6 – $0.697 observations: • grok is 7.7x the price of deepseek. it is the only model that read the light – low sun, real shadows on the station, a cold night on the motel • gemini is the fastest and the least deliberate. 17,158 reasoning tokens against deepseek's 99,172, and it still shipped the most code – 3,989 lines • deepseek thought hardest and rendered plainest. 99,172 reasoning tokens, 5.8x gemini's, spent on layout rather than on light. its motel is the second best in the set for $0.030 • ox alpha is free and reads a photo as well as anything here – it lifted "family units / kitchenettes" off the pylon and redrew it in canvas conclusion: twelve scenes, four models, zero fixes, and the whole run cost $0.924! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

24,272 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The new DeepSeek V4.1 Flash model is mindblowing - back on top of the open-source model leaderboard and extremely cheap. It has a lot of very smart ways to be efficient and highly capable so I made a video of the forward pass to give you a view of what going on inside the model during inference. Read more at And find the weights at

The new DeepSeek V4.1 Flash model is mindblowing - back on top of the open-source model leaderboard and extremely cheap. It has a lot of very smart ways to be efficient and highly capable so I made a video of the forward pass to give you a view of what going on inside the model during inference. Read more at And find the weights at

Thomas Wolf

65,923 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen