Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Speaking in Kiambu National Polytechnic on Budget & Privatisation, National Treasury CS, John Mbadi has termed Kes 30,000/month as "survival salary" that government has "no business taxing". I hope this means Finance Bill 2026 includes a proposal to revise the tax free income threshold (post-personal relief) from kes 24,000...

81,379 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

24 Kommentare

Profilbild von Diamonds DK
Diamonds DKvor 7 Monaten

Political gimmicks it's election time - they will want to reduce all taxes in June and the next finance bill in 2028 will be crazy they will even tax oxygen.. Remember the 2024 Finance bill? This year the government will reduce several taxes to for election games

Profilbild von Yussuf Omar Daqane
Yussuf Omar Daqanevor 7 Monaten

There’s something worth paying attention to here. This moment feels planned. It’s possible the groundwork is being laid to make Kenyans more sympathetic ahead of the 2026 budget. Not through clarity, but through confusion. The question isn’t what they’re saying. It’s what they’re setting up. What exactly are they positioning the public to accept?

Profilbild von saahi
saahivor 7 Monaten

The govt has no business taxing . Unless it is to raise the net worth of some more than others.

Profilbild von zak kamau
zak kamauvor 7 Monaten

@NjiruL Making 30K tax would reduce revenue collection. The average salary of most employees is 30k. The goal is to reduce PAYE rates across different bands.

Profilbild von KipD
KipDvor 7 Monaten

As Good as done Finance bill 2026 will have a lot of sweeteners as we enter election year.

Profilbild von Samo K
Samo Kvor 7 Monaten

And it needs to be at 0%, not the shenanigans of offsetting it with relief

Profilbild von theman
themanvor 7 Monaten

This is great,is it sustainable

Profilbild von Gachoka Kang'ata-GK
Gachoka Kang'ata-GKvor 7 Monaten

@AmbokoJH @KRACare @kra what's easiest way to transition ETR to Etims

Profilbild von Diamonds DK
Diamonds DKvor 7 Monaten

Even the housing levy will be scrapped this year but if they win by accident the new taxes will make 2024 look like a joke. Don't trust them

Profilbild von SØN
SØNvor 7 Monaten

Rigathi's call for Okoa Payslip has made the govt rethink alot

Profilbild von aesaewk
aesaewkvor 7 Monaten

A bit of common sense is slowly dripping on the executive

Profilbild von #!/Engineer/Mwirigi
#!/Engineer/Mwirigivor 7 Monaten

all over sudden, they have become very clever.

Profilbild von Yoda
Yodavor 7 Monaten

what does that mean for the deficit this year? They better lower the rates a bit further

Profilbild von Blackubuntu
Blackubuntuvor 7 Monaten

U can't believe what these guys are saying. You will be a fool to believe them once again. They've never delivered on any of their promises

Profilbild von vasa recta 
vasa recta vor 7 Monaten

while it is a good thing, that gap will have to be bridged! And am scared 😳 coz the government ain’t there to make your life easier.

Profilbild von Jeff Muturi
Jeff Muturivor 7 Monaten

We are approaching elections so expect kasongo to lower taxes so that he can appease the public.

Profilbild von mzalendo kenya
mzalendo kenyavor 7 Monaten

This is a government of propaganda and promies that will never happen, if they wanted they would have already ammended the law like they did with the housing levy n all

Profilbild von Mike Kuria
Mike Kuriavor 7 Monaten

While it is true that life for the poor is difficult, focused on survival and is purely logistical 100% of the time (where to go, what to do, what to eat, where to work), the fact is this could have been done yesrs ago. The government decided to kill and disappear people rsther than do this. So it's too little too late and the impact on election results is likely to be very marginal

Profilbild von T 🎲
T 🎲vor 7 Monaten

They will reduce it this year as a campaign tool, then re-introduce it after re-election

Profilbild von Maina܁ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ
Maina܁ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠvor 7 Monaten

While it's a good move, a person earning 30k is currently paying 731 bob.

Profilbild von david bundi
david bundivor 7 Monaten

Very convenient to say all that while in Kiambu 😂. Let him actualize that in the budget. Let's see implementations. Not lamentations.

Profilbild von @HeyItsPascal
@HeyItsPascalvor 7 Monaten

There is something here, what exactly are they trying to do? Are they actually telling us they care or they are just laying down the building blocks for some grand plan.

Profilbild von Mabati Plug
Mabati Plugvor 7 Monaten

public relations is the course they mastered

Profilbild von Wailer01
Wailer01vor 7 Monaten

All this while increasing tax on sanitary pads, daipers etc.

Ähnliche Videos

Should the taxpayer still bear the burden of proof in instances where a tax dispute with the Revenue Authority is based in pre-populated & third party data? In my submission before the National Assembly's Finance & Planning Committee on behalf of the Tax Research Centre at Strathmore University, I argue that Finance Bill 2026's proposals seeking to anchor Incomes & Expenses Validation in law will be incomplete if they do not include a proposal for the the Revenue Authority being saddled with the burden of proof in such instances. Here's why: · Finance Bill 2026 proposes to amend Sec75 of the Tax Procedures Act to provide that the Revenue Authority may use technology to pre-populate tax returns on behalf of a person required to submit or lodge a tax return · Finance Bill 2026 further proposes that a person required to submit or lodge a tax return may rely on pre-populated return generated by the Revenue Authority to file their return · Finance Bill 2026 proposes to amend Sec112 to provide that the Cabinet Secretary of the National Treasury may make Regulations for the procedure for the submission or lodging of returns based on pre-populated tax returns generated by the Revenue Authority Here's where the problem is: · In all this, Sec56(1) which provides that "In any proceedings, the burden shall be on the taxpayer to prove that a tax decision is incorrect" remains unchanged · Sec56(1) is predicated on the fact that Kenya has been running on a self-assessment based regime & the data upon which tax disputes emerges was held by the taxpayer · With Incomes & Expenses Validation & the onset of a Dual Assessment regime in Kenya, taxpayers are now exposed not just to errors of judgement & data on their part, but also errors of technology & transmission which are out of their control · Can we really still have the burden of proof lying exclusively with the taxpayer in an environment where tax compliance has shifted from a function of record keeping to one where system integration reliability is now a key factor?

Julians Amboko

312,974 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten