Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇳🇴‼️🚨 STABILIZED FOOTAGE: I have stabilized the footage to better see the ball's trajectory. You can clearly see it changing the flight path suddenly and going down quickly. The ball touched the camera cable and fell onto an English team’s lap, allowing Bellingham’s goal against Norway. FIFA claims no... show more

Lord Bebo

803,721 subscribers

450,888 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Sport

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Croatia was kicked out of the match because Matanic touched the ball with his hair AND the referee had to decide if Viega’s contact with the ball is considered “deliberate play”. If yes, the goal was correct, but the referee decided “no”. But what are the rules saying? In FIFA and IFAB Laws of the Game, deliberate play is when a player has control of the ball and attempts to pass, gain possession, or clear it. *‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of: •passing the ball to a team-mate; •gaining possession of the ball; or •clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) ➡️clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) And that’s what Viega did. He cleared the ball. But a Croatian player managed to intercept the ball before it went out of play; that led to the goal. Croatia was robbed. Source in comments.

Croatia was kicked out of the match because Matanic touched the ball with his hair AND the referee had to decide if Viega’s contact with the ball is considered “deliberate play”. If yes, the goal was correct, but the referee decided “no”. But what are the rules saying? In FIFA and IFAB Laws of the Game, deliberate play is when a player has control of the ball and attempts to pass, gain possession, or clear it. *‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of: •passing the ball to a team-mate; •gaining possession of the ball; or •clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) ➡️clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) And that’s what Viega did. He cleared the ball. But a Croatian player managed to intercept the ball before it went out of play; that led to the goal. Croatia was robbed. Source in comments.

Goran Majić

35,114 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇳🇴 NORWAY ROBBED?! A camera wire block Norway’s free kick. It then led to a goal by Jude. By FIFA’s own rules it should’ve been disallowed. 👇🏾 If an outside agent (anything not part of the field, players, or officials — like a camera cable, drone, animal, etc.) interferes with the ball while it’s in play, the referee should stop play and restart with a dropped ball (or indirect free kick in some cases)

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇳🇴 NORWAY ROBBED?! A camera wire block Norway’s free kick. It then led to a goal by Jude. By FIFA’s own rules it should’ve been disallowed. 👇🏾 If an outside agent (anything not part of the field, players, or officials — like a camera cable, drone, animal, etc.) interferes with the ball while it’s in play, the referee should stop play and restart with a dropped ball (or indirect free kick in some cases)

Rodney

298,731 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The AFL has confirmed the Judd McVee third umpire overrule was an error and that both clubs have been contacted to concede the mistake. The Demons were only 15 points down at this stage. McVee clearly touched the ball, AFL ARC over ruled the behind call and called it a goal

The AFL has confirmed the Judd McVee third umpire overrule was an error and that both clubs have been contacted to concede the mistake. The Demons were only 15 points down at this stage. McVee clearly touched the ball, AFL ARC over ruled the behind call and called it a goal

Jon Ralph

146,427 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This was the most controversial decisions in modern soccer. The ball hit a camera cable, and the play should have been stopped.This is an objective rules error, not a bad call. Norway has the right to request a replay.

This was the most controversial decisions in modern soccer. The ball hit a camera cable, and the play should have been stopped.This is an objective rules error, not a bad call. Norway has the right to request a replay.

VICTORIA FOREVER MAGA 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 🇬🇷

59,784 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.

Mark Valorian

149,871 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#RugbyScoop | Here’s why I think this is an incorrect call: The tackle is complete. Gelant has two options: (by the way he is short off the goal line) - he’s suppose to place the ball and the tackler must release him (complete tackle scenario) - Gelant done not release the ball nor is he in a good position to reach out and score a try - look at his body position (also, you not allowed to have an extra roll forward once a tackle is complete) Morby - can be pinged on playing the Stormers 15 on the ground but first infringement is by ball carrier. You have to break it down step by step. First it’s ball carrier and tackler before everything else.

#RugbyScoop | Here’s why I think this is an incorrect call: The tackle is complete. Gelant has two options: (by the way he is short off the goal line) - he’s suppose to place the ball and the tackler must release him (complete tackle scenario) - Gelant done not release the ball nor is he in a good position to reach out and score a try - look at his body position (also, you not allowed to have an extra roll forward once a tackle is complete) Morby - can be pinged on playing the Stormers 15 on the ground but first infringement is by ball carrier. You have to break it down step by step. First it’s ball carrier and tackler before everything else.

Scoop 🐻 ☕️

30,379 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

🎥 You can see from this slowed clip. When the ball hits the bar it’s trajectory is it’s going down and over the line, just. It hitting Verbruggen’s hand on the way down only deflects it right to the back of the net. 👉 Decision: Assist stands, Bruno’s record remains 👑 🅰️

🎥 You can see from this slowed clip. When the ball hits the bar it’s trajectory is it’s going down and over the line, just. It hitting Verbruggen’s hand on the way down only deflects it right to the back of the net. 👉 Decision: Assist stands, Bruno’s record remains 👑 🅰️

Red Army 68' 🇾🇪

203,143 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is a great example of using analytics to inform your principles of play. As you can see, the longer it is in the shot clock, the lower the field goal percentage. As a coach, you have to ask yourself, “How do I slow the other team down?” And one of the ways you can do this is by tagging up on a shot attempt. Tagging up: offensive players will crash the glass by “tagging” the player closest to them. This allows the offense, which is going to defense, to match up already. This slows down transition offenses by “choking” the ball and making it more difficult for players to throw outlet passes. It will also slow the other team’s offense down if they rely on one player to initiate their offense. 🎥/🎬: NBA

This is a great example of using analytics to inform your principles of play. As you can see, the longer it is in the shot clock, the lower the field goal percentage. As a coach, you have to ask yourself, “How do I slow the other team down?” And one of the ways you can do this is by tagging up on a shot attempt. Tagging up: offensive players will crash the glass by “tagging” the player closest to them. This allows the offense, which is going to defense, to match up already. This slows down transition offenses by “choking” the ball and making it more difficult for players to throw outlet passes. It will also slow the other team’s offense down if they rely on one player to initiate their offense. 🎥/🎬: NBA

Transforming Basketball

85,904 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

JUST IN: Trump reveals U.S. Space Force has cameras in orbit that can “read the badge” of Iranian officials entering nuclear sites. Yet our government wants you to believe this blurry footage is Tyler Robinson and that no footage exists showing him actually taking the shot from the rooftop. 😂 Something those “space cameras” would easily be able to see. Let’s see the “space camera” footage!

JUST IN: Trump reveals U.S. Space Force has cameras in orbit that can “read the badge” of Iranian officials entering nuclear sites. Yet our government wants you to believe this blurry footage is Tyler Robinson and that no footage exists showing him actually taking the shot from the rooftop. 😂 Something those “space cameras” would easily be able to see. Let’s see the “space camera” footage!

KC

1,195,430 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“I want this group to believe they can win the World Cup. I want this group to set that as their goal, as their standard, as their North Star and see how it plays out.” Maurice Edu breaks down the approach the USMNT should have going into the 2026 FIFA World Cup:

“I want this group to believe they can win the World Cup. I want this group to set that as their goal, as their standard, as their North Star and see how it plays out.” Maurice Edu breaks down the approach the USMNT should have going into the 2026 FIFA World Cup:

First Things First

17,496 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

How to set up the tee for a pitch down the middle, inside & outside. I see far too many athletes setting up incorrectly when doing tee work at my clinics and I see it from all ages. I can’t stress enough how important it is to have the tee in the correct spot. You can have the best swing in the world but if your contact point is off, it does you no good. For a pitch down the middle, you’ll want to make contact with the ball about even with your front foot in order to stay connected and hit for maximum power. Inside will be right outside of front foot and outside will be right inside of front foot. Letting the ball travel too deep will jam you and catching too far out front will force you to hit the ball off the end of the bat and roll over. So for those wanting to change swing mechanics so quickly for mishitting the ball, check your contact points first.

How to set up the tee for a pitch down the middle, inside & outside. I see far too many athletes setting up incorrectly when doing tee work at my clinics and I see it from all ages. I can’t stress enough how important it is to have the tee in the correct spot. You can have the best swing in the world but if your contact point is off, it does you no good. For a pitch down the middle, you’ll want to make contact with the ball about even with your front foot in order to stay connected and hit for maximum power. Inside will be right outside of front foot and outside will be right inside of front foot. Letting the ball travel too deep will jam you and catching too far out front will force you to hit the ball off the end of the bat and roll over. So for those wanting to change swing mechanics so quickly for mishitting the ball, check your contact points first.

Megan Rembielak

34,461 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

One additional point to consider about the YouTube creators being incentivized by AtNight to peddle baseless theories—such as the Texas Roadhouse claims and their latest attempt to “debunk” the “lights” video—is the nature of the footage they are using. The video they are analyzing is not an original copy of the surveillance footage. It is a recording taken by someone using their phone to capture a computer monitor playing the footage. The borders of the video have been cropped, and the footage has been stabilized, which masks the fact that it’s a secondhand recording. As a result, what you’re seeing is not an accurate representation of the original surveillance footage. You lose critical context, such as the plane and angle of the recording, the camera shake from the person’s unsteady hand, and how they selectively zoom in on certain parts of the screen. In contrast, the unedited version tells a different story. This surveillance footage was recorded by the property owner directly off the monitor because they didn’t know how to export it from the server. Before the TBI took possession of the server, the footage was recorded by playing it back on the monitor and capturing it with a phone. What you’re watching is essentially a recording of a recording being played on a computer monitor. Even a slight tilt or shift of the phone during recording can distort the perspective, and this has likely affected what you see in the manipulated version. So, the “packaged version” they are pushing is just more misinformation designed to mislead and sell their narrative. That’s the truth of the matter. Attached is the raw version which you can see the edges of the computer monitor.

One additional point to consider about the YouTube creators being incentivized by AtNight to peddle baseless theories—such as the Texas Roadhouse claims and their latest attempt to “debunk” the “lights” video—is the nature of the footage they are using. The video they are analyzing is not an original copy of the surveillance footage. It is a recording taken by someone using their phone to capture a computer monitor playing the footage. The borders of the video have been cropped, and the footage has been stabilized, which masks the fact that it’s a secondhand recording. As a result, what you’re seeing is not an accurate representation of the original surveillance footage. You lose critical context, such as the plane and angle of the recording, the camera shake from the person’s unsteady hand, and how they selectively zoom in on certain parts of the screen. In contrast, the unedited version tells a different story. This surveillance footage was recorded by the property owner directly off the monitor because they didn’t know how to export it from the server. Before the TBI took possession of the server, the footage was recorded by playing it back on the monitor and capturing it with a phone. What you’re watching is essentially a recording of a recording being played on a computer monitor. Even a slight tilt or shift of the phone during recording can distort the perspective, and this has likely affected what you see in the manipulated version. So, the “packaged version” they are pushing is just more misinformation designed to mislead and sell their narrative. That’s the truth of the matter. Attached is the raw version which you can see the edges of the computer monitor.

SF INVESTIGATES • STEVE FISCHER

12,497 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Someone just sent me this: “At 12:05 a.m., two masked women came onto my property and deliberately sprayed my CCTV camera in an apparent attempt to stop it from recording. The entire incident was captured on video and has been reported to the police. The footage shows two women. One appears to be shorter, around 50 years old, wearing glasses. The other appears taller, around her 30s, with noticeable makeup visible despite the face covering. It is deeply disappointing to see adults behave like this. If they have families, it makes their actions even more upsetting. If anyone recognises the individuals shown in the footage or has any information about this incident, please contact me privately or contact the police directly. Please share this post. Thank you”.

Someone just sent me this: “At 12:05 a.m., two masked women came onto my property and deliberately sprayed my CCTV camera in an apparent attempt to stop it from recording. The entire incident was captured on video and has been reported to the police. The footage shows two women. One appears to be shorter, around 50 years old, wearing glasses. The other appears taller, around her 30s, with noticeable makeup visible despite the face covering. It is deeply disappointing to see adults behave like this. If they have families, it makes their actions even more upsetting. If anyone recognises the individuals shown in the footage or has any information about this incident, please contact me privately or contact the police directly. Please share this post. Thank you”.

Around Liverpool

56,792 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This video was filmed by one of my friends and sent to me. In this footage, you can clearly see the police kettling people and then launching an attack on them. There are numerous videos from multiple angles that show the reality of what happened. No expert theories are needed when the truth is visible on camera.

This video was filmed by one of my friends and sent to me. In this footage, you can clearly see the police kettling people and then launching an attack on them. There are numerous videos from multiple angles that show the reality of what happened. No expert theories are needed when the truth is visible on camera.

Niyak Ghorbani (نیاک)

112,290 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

𝗝𝗼𝗺𝗼 𝗦𝗼𝗻𝗼’𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘄𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗶 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗼.𝟭𝟬 𝗷𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲𝘆 “He can have it [the jersey]; there is no problem. But, do not compare an elephant to an ant. I saw him [dancing on the ball] and going towards his own goal, and I switched to English football...I entertained the crowd, but I wasn’t going that way when Pirates were going in a different direction," - Jomo Sono. #FARPost

𝗝𝗼𝗺𝗼 𝗦𝗼𝗻𝗼’𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘄𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗶 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗼.𝟭𝟬 𝗷𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲𝘆 “He can have it [the jersey]; there is no problem. But, do not compare an elephant to an ant. I saw him [dancing on the ball] and going towards his own goal, and I switched to English football...I entertained the crowd, but I wasn’t going that way when Pirates were going in a different direction," - Jomo Sono. #FARPost

FARPost

393,263 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

the key 4th down in slow motion I don’t know if he got this (I think he did) but there must be a better way to spot the ball the ref who is completely blocked & is standing on the Chiefs sideline runs in & overrules the spot and marks it short no way he can see the ball

the key 4th down in slow motion I don’t know if he got this (I think he did) but there must be a better way to spot the ball the ref who is completely blocked & is standing on the Chiefs sideline runs in & overrules the spot and marks it short no way he can see the ball

Warren Sharp

2,737,476 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

74,462 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Some people online are claiming that #Kirk was shot up close by a man standing next/close to him. This is not true. When you analyse the footage you can clearly see that the man standing next to him has his right hand under his left arm. After the impact you can clearly see his right hand is empty, NO GUN. #OSINT #CharlieKirk

Some people online are claiming that #Kirk was shot up close by a man standing next/close to him. This is not true. When you analyse the footage you can clearly see that the man standing next to him has his right hand under his left arm. After the impact you can clearly see his right hand is empty, NO GUN. #OSINT #CharlieKirk

Dutch Osint Guy Nico

60,855 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Introducing the “Get” action in basketball to lacrosse! The “Get” is a 2man action where a player passes the ball to another player and sprints to go “Get” it back on a handoff. This action has similar concepts and reads to pick and roll, but the picker is actually the ball handler! In lacrosse, we have been experimenting with Gets because it creates so many interesting situations and reads for the players. The way we teach it in small sided games is to have one offensive player declare “I’m shut” and the defense has to face-guard him. From there we pick for the shut off player trying to spring them free for the Get. The ball handler has to engage and control their defender, anticipating the shut player trying to get open. The shut player can backdoor if being overplayed towards the get (rejecting the get), receive a flip, or continue curling around the ball getting open for a late pass. The ball handler can feed the reject, flip the ball, or fake the flip to attack the goal or make a late pass to the shut payer curling to the goal. I’ve seen examples of this run in men’s and women’s DI lacrosse at Ohio State and Northwestern, respectively and I’ve run this myself when I was coaching HS girls lacrosse. You will also see on this reel a sick application for Gets vs. a common big-little invert coverage where the short stick doesn’t go behind with his man and plays “Safety” in front of the net. Gets are fun for the players, are incredible for teaching your players 2man game on and off ball, dealing with double teams, and creativity with passing, and can be used to score goals. I hope you enjoy it! Can you think of other applications for Gets?

Introducing the “Get” action in basketball to lacrosse! The “Get” is a 2man action where a player passes the ball to another player and sprints to go “Get” it back on a handoff. This action has similar concepts and reads to pick and roll, but the picker is actually the ball handler! In lacrosse, we have been experimenting with Gets because it creates so many interesting situations and reads for the players. The way we teach it in small sided games is to have one offensive player declare “I’m shut” and the defense has to face-guard him. From there we pick for the shut off player trying to spring them free for the Get. The ball handler has to engage and control their defender, anticipating the shut player trying to get open. The shut player can backdoor if being overplayed towards the get (rejecting the get), receive a flip, or continue curling around the ball getting open for a late pass. The ball handler can feed the reject, flip the ball, or fake the flip to attack the goal or make a late pass to the shut payer curling to the goal. I’ve seen examples of this run in men’s and women’s DI lacrosse at Ohio State and Northwestern, respectively and I’ve run this myself when I was coaching HS girls lacrosse. You will also see on this reel a sick application for Gets vs. a common big-little invert coverage where the short stick doesn’t go behind with his man and plays “Safety” in front of the net. Gets are fun for the players, are incredible for teaching your players 2man game on and off ball, dealing with double teams, and creativity with passing, and can be used to score goals. I hope you enjoy it! Can you think of other applications for Gets?

JM3 SPORTS

12,424 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr