Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Standard COMMUNALISATION script being used by mosque committee of ILLEGALLY BUILT 38,000 sq ft complex on prime Ramlila Maidan just before court-ordered demolition First let’s look at what documents say: -Land belongs to MCD and L&DO. It’s public land, not private or religious property -The complex houses banquet hall...

swati_gs's profile picture

Swati Goel Sharma

519,197 subscribers

43,259 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

IMPORTANT To enforce the demolition order by Delhi High Court, security forces reached the illegally built mosque complex at Ramlila Maidan-Turkman Gate today As expected, a large crowd gathered to obstruct officials from doing their duty - using baseless rhetoric Key falsehood being pushed - ‘The mosque side was never heard’! THIS IS PATENTLY FALSE. Facts on record: - The land belongs to L&DO leased to Municipal Corporation of Delhi - MCD conducted multiple hearings with mosque managing committee and Delhi Waqf Board in Nov and Dec - They FAILED to produce any ownership or authorisation documents! -MCD’s final conclusion report dated 22 Dec 2025 records these findings and is attached It was Preet Singh (Preet Sirohi) who painstakingly traced every document related to this land since 1940. And after examining those, Delhi high court ordered demolition of the illegal 38,000 sq ft encroachment on 12 Nov For the record: Sewa Nyaya Utthan Foundation (Sewa Nyaya Utthan Foundation) has backed the legal fight of Preet’s Save India Foundation throughout this case We won’t let propaganda thrive this time
1:05

IMPORTANT To enforce the demolition order by Delhi High Court, security forces reached the illegally built mosque complex at Ramlila Maidan-Turkman Gate today As expected, a large crowd gathered to obstruct officials from doing their duty - using baseless rhetoric Key falsehood being pushed - ‘The mosque side was never heard’! THIS IS PATENTLY FALSE. Facts on record: - The land belongs to L&DO leased to Municipal Corporation of Delhi - MCD conducted multiple hearings with mosque managing committee and Delhi Waqf Board in Nov and Dec - They FAILED to produce any ownership or authorisation documents! -MCD’s final conclusion report dated 22 Dec 2025 records these findings and is attached It was Preet Singh (Preet Sirohi) who painstakingly traced every document related to this land since 1940. And after examining those, Delhi high court ordered demolition of the illegal 38,000 sq ft encroachment on 12 Nov For the record: Sewa Nyaya Utthan Foundation (Sewa Nyaya Utthan Foundation) has backed the legal fight of Preet’s Save India Foundation throughout this case We won’t let propaganda thrive this time

Swati Goel Sharma

70,542 views • 7 months ago

Illegally built communal structure razed by Haridwar administration after an official survey found that two bighas of irrigation department land had been grabbed. Encroachers were also earning from it in name of religion This is need of the hour. Admin must take action themselves and not let the land grab become to huge that they get scared to act, forcing civic activists to engage in lengthy and expensive court battles In Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan case that Rashtra Jyoti exposed, departments are simply refusing to act despite their own internal survey confirming illegal communal structures on 45000 sq feet of Ramlila Maidan land pained by MCD and PWD depts, after complaints by Preet Sirohi They are forcing us to go to court. We will
0:56

Illegally built communal structure razed by Haridwar administration after an official survey found that two bighas of irrigation department land had been grabbed. Encroachers were also earning from it in name of religion This is need of the hour. Admin must take action themselves and not let the land grab become to huge that they get scared to act, forcing civic activists to engage in lengthy and expensive court battles In Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan case that Rashtra Jyoti exposed, departments are simply refusing to act despite their own internal survey confirming illegal communal structures on 45000 sq feet of Ramlila Maidan land pained by MCD and PWD depts, after complaints by Preet Sirohi They are forcing us to go to court. We will

Swati Goel Sharma

25,902 views • 9 months ago

BIG ACTION in DELHI LAST NIGHT Three months ago, Rashtra Jyoti exclusively exposed 38000 sq feet of land grab by a mosque committee in Ramlila Maidan-Turkman Gate, based on explosive findings by Preet Sirohi Finally, last night, Delhi municipal corporation DEMOLISHED the encroachment amid heavy security forces, using multiple bulldozers The lawful action was disrupted by communal sloganeering and stone pelting, but forces brought it under control In days leading to the court-ordered demolition, heavy misinformation propaganda was mobilised by mosque committee and their allied media. Despite municipal body itself giving them multiple chances to prove land ownership, they FAILED Yet, they went to court to get a last-minute stay using pressure tactics THE GAME DIDN’T WORK THIS TIME Court examined the case and refused In the latest hearing, it additionally emerged that not only the 38000 sq feet mosque complex housing namaz area, commercial baraat ghar, commercial diagnostic centre etc were ILLEGAL, but the 8000 sq feet Faiz e IlAhi mosque itself is ILLEGAL! It’s the same mosque where Umar Nabi stayed before carrying out Red Fort terror blast Fearing that they could lose the mosque as well, communal leaders like Delhi Jama Masjid shahi imam backed out yesterday, and appealed to the community to stay home all night. Yet, as you can see, many hit the streets to attack authorities. But forces were prepared. Area was fortified So this is the gist of the MASSIVE IMPACT of our work. Preet Singh’s Save India was backed by Sewa Nyaya Utthan Foundation throughout
0:25

BIG ACTION in DELHI LAST NIGHT Three months ago, Rashtra Jyoti exclusively exposed 38000 sq feet of land grab by a mosque committee in Ramlila Maidan-Turkman Gate, based on explosive findings by Preet Sirohi Finally, last night, Delhi municipal corporation DEMOLISHED the encroachment amid heavy security forces, using multiple bulldozers The lawful action was disrupted by communal sloganeering and stone pelting, but forces brought it under control In days leading to the court-ordered demolition, heavy misinformation propaganda was mobilised by mosque committee and their allied media. Despite municipal body itself giving them multiple chances to prove land ownership, they FAILED Yet, they went to court to get a last-minute stay using pressure tactics THE GAME DIDN’T WORK THIS TIME Court examined the case and refused In the latest hearing, it additionally emerged that not only the 38000 sq feet mosque complex housing namaz area, commercial baraat ghar, commercial diagnostic centre etc were ILLEGAL, but the 8000 sq feet Faiz e IlAhi mosque itself is ILLEGAL! It’s the same mosque where Umar Nabi stayed before carrying out Red Fort terror blast Fearing that they could lose the mosque as well, communal leaders like Delhi Jama Masjid shahi imam backed out yesterday, and appealed to the community to stay home all night. Yet, as you can see, many hit the streets to attack authorities. But forces were prepared. Area was fortified So this is the gist of the MASSIVE IMPACT of our work. Preet Singh’s Save India was backed by Sewa Nyaya Utthan Foundation throughout

Swati Goel Sharma

252,290 views • 7 months ago

THIS ONGOING DEMOLITION IN DELTA STATE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT IF YOU BUILD ANYWHERE IN NIGERIA WITHOUT HAVING TITLE DOCUMENTS, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR MONEY. When it comes to real estate and demolition of properties, only a heartless person wouldn't sympathize over such a huge loss. However, let's learn to do things how it's done so that it can be how it should be. Regardless of wherever you are in Nigeria, don't buy land without title documents. They won't ask you if you are Igbo or Yoruba. They will ask for your documents. Receipts, survey plans, and contracts of land sale aren't title documents. In Europe, America, South Africa, or anywhere the principle of "Quicquid plantatur solo, solo cedit" (whatever is attached to the land belongs to the landowner) is applicable, you can't just build on land that you don't have its title document. It will end in tears. See, the law is the law. If you have title documents and your property is earmarked for demolition because the government needs it, you will be adequately compensated. But if the land isn't yours, no one will compensate you. And that's why when buying lands, you must make sure you get the title documents: either excision, C of O, or Governor's consent. With registered or provisional survey, receipts, deeds of assignments, court judgments, or gazettes that prove the seller has the right to sell what they are selling and what they are selling is in good standing. Real estate is an investment. You make better investment decisions when you have knowledge of the investment. Lastly, real estate, like all investment, is risky. You don't negate risk; you mitigate it.
1:06

THIS ONGOING DEMOLITION IN DELTA STATE SHOULD TELL YOU THAT IF YOU BUILD ANYWHERE IN NIGERIA WITHOUT HAVING TITLE DOCUMENTS, YOU ARE WASTING YOUR MONEY. When it comes to real estate and demolition of properties, only a heartless person wouldn't sympathize over such a huge loss. However, let's learn to do things how it's done so that it can be how it should be. Regardless of wherever you are in Nigeria, don't buy land without title documents. They won't ask you if you are Igbo or Yoruba. They will ask for your documents. Receipts, survey plans, and contracts of land sale aren't title documents. In Europe, America, South Africa, or anywhere the principle of "Quicquid plantatur solo, solo cedit" (whatever is attached to the land belongs to the landowner) is applicable, you can't just build on land that you don't have its title document. It will end in tears. See, the law is the law. If you have title documents and your property is earmarked for demolition because the government needs it, you will be adequately compensated. But if the land isn't yours, no one will compensate you. And that's why when buying lands, you must make sure you get the title documents: either excision, C of O, or Governor's consent. With registered or provisional survey, receipts, deeds of assignments, court judgments, or gazettes that prove the seller has the right to sell what they are selling and what they are selling is in good standing. Real estate is an investment. You make better investment decisions when you have knowledge of the investment. Lastly, real estate, like all investment, is risky. You don't negate risk; you mitigate it.

🏘️IamEri'Oluwa🇳🇬

16,501 views • 2 years ago

A bulldozer arrives to remove encroachments from Narkeldanga First Lane, which runs perpendicular to Narkeldanga Main Road (Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Sarani), Kolkata 700011. Watch skullcaps gather to obstruct the clean-up. Only a portion of the five-storey building at Kasai Basti Cross Lane was demolished on Thursday. The remaining will be done in phases. The Telegraph reports: The demolition drive went beyond Tiljala on a day sources in the civic body and the Bengal administration said they were merely executing old court orders whose execution had been tardy until now. “There are existing court orders for the demolition of several unauthorised buildings. We are complying with the orders. The Narkeldanga building was one of many such buildings,” a KMC official said. The demolition order was passed by a division bench of the high court in the third week of April, sources said. Sources in the government said the court orders were not new. But the execution was “tardy” because of political compulsions. “Now, the game has changed. We will play by the book. The rule of law will prevail,” said one of them. The building in Narkeldanga has tailoring units on the first floor. The rest of it is residential. More than 20 families live there. Over a hundred people, said neighbours. The machine, accompanied by men — police and paramilitary jawans — reached the neighbourhood around 2pm. Barricades were set up on both ends of the narrow lane. A crowd built up beyond the barricades. A section of the residents claimed they had approached the Supreme Court, challenging the demolition ordered by a division bench of the Calcutta High Court. “My 28-year-old daughter had heart surgery last year. We are on the fifth (top) floor. A portion of the terrace was demolished. The repeated sounds were too disturbing for her,” said a woman. The demolition drive followed a warning from Bengal chief minister Suvendu Adhikari on May 13. He said he had asked the CESC to conduct an internal audit of illegal buildings across the city and stop power supply to them. “We are coordinating with the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. The civic body is identifying the illegal buildings, and we are identifying unauthorised connections,” said CESC spokesperson. Sources in the utility said new power connections are issued after basic checks. “Otherwise, every home would end up with multiple meters. But the civic body must inform us if a building is illegal. We will act accordingly,” a source said. A KMC official said that a similar court-ordered demolition of a portion of a restaurant in central Calcutta had recently been carried out. “The demolition continued for more than a week and ended on May 11,” the official said.
0:31

A bulldozer arrives to remove encroachments from Narkeldanga First Lane, which runs perpendicular to Narkeldanga Main Road (Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Sarani), Kolkata 700011. Watch skullcaps gather to obstruct the clean-up. Only a portion of the five-storey building at Kasai Basti Cross Lane was demolished on Thursday. The remaining will be done in phases. The Telegraph reports: The demolition drive went beyond Tiljala on a day sources in the civic body and the Bengal administration said they were merely executing old court orders whose execution had been tardy until now. “There are existing court orders for the demolition of several unauthorised buildings. We are complying with the orders. The Narkeldanga building was one of many such buildings,” a KMC official said. The demolition order was passed by a division bench of the high court in the third week of April, sources said. Sources in the government said the court orders were not new. But the execution was “tardy” because of political compulsions. “Now, the game has changed. We will play by the book. The rule of law will prevail,” said one of them. The building in Narkeldanga has tailoring units on the first floor. The rest of it is residential. More than 20 families live there. Over a hundred people, said neighbours. The machine, accompanied by men — police and paramilitary jawans — reached the neighbourhood around 2pm. Barricades were set up on both ends of the narrow lane. A crowd built up beyond the barricades. A section of the residents claimed they had approached the Supreme Court, challenging the demolition ordered by a division bench of the Calcutta High Court. “My 28-year-old daughter had heart surgery last year. We are on the fifth (top) floor. A portion of the terrace was demolished. The repeated sounds were too disturbing for her,” said a woman. The demolition drive followed a warning from Bengal chief minister Suvendu Adhikari on May 13. He said he had asked the CESC to conduct an internal audit of illegal buildings across the city and stop power supply to them. “We are coordinating with the Kolkata Municipal Corporation. The civic body is identifying the illegal buildings, and we are identifying unauthorised connections,” said CESC spokesperson. Sources in the utility said new power connections are issued after basic checks. “Otherwise, every home would end up with multiple meters. But the civic body must inform us if a building is illegal. We will act accordingly,” a source said. A KMC official said that a similar court-ordered demolition of a portion of a restaurant in central Calcutta had recently been carried out. “The demolition continued for more than a week and ended on May 11,” the official said.

Surajit Dasgupta

43,250 views • 3 months ago

🦅🏡⚖️ : David Eby lied to everyone 11 days ago about the BC Supreme Court ruling on Cowichan land title claims against private property owners, in Richmond British Columbia. 🧐Watch the full brief video as there are several clips added to provide full context. In the last clip hereditary Chief of Lyackson, Huy’wu’qw Shana Thomas, makes it clear, she wants Aboriginal title to apply to all the properties in the same way the Crown had title, when the Crown sold the property to the current land owners. Giving Aboriginal title would nullify the current land owners title and force them to make an agreement with whichever tribe regains land title, through the courts. Remember folks, some properties have multiple land title claims against the property, from multiple 1st Nation tribes. The major question is, why has David Eby not resigned? How many times can a Premier lie to taxpayers on critical issues? David Eby knew for years he could inform private property owners who have a land title claim against their property and he chose to keep them out of the process. This was an intentional act, ensuring the BC Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cowichan land title claim, Eby is now pretending to partially oppose. How can Eby, the Federal government or the City of Richmond be counted on to fight for land title rights for current property owners, when they all conspired to omit those very property owners, from the court case? 95% of British Columbia could be impacted by the precedence the Cowichan land title ruling presents in Richmond BC. The entire city of Kamloops has a land title claim against it. So it's impossible to ignore the devastating impact this could have on almost everyone in British Columbia who owns property or who has a mortgage / reverse mortgage on their property. This is especially true if lenders begin to refuse to provide loans to people who currently have loan agreements because the risks of lenders losing their loan investments, are too great.
2:32

🦅🏡⚖️ : David Eby lied to everyone 11 days ago about the BC Supreme Court ruling on Cowichan land title claims against private property owners, in Richmond British Columbia. 🧐Watch the full brief video as there are several clips added to provide full context. In the last clip hereditary Chief of Lyackson, Huy’wu’qw Shana Thomas, makes it clear, she wants Aboriginal title to apply to all the properties in the same way the Crown had title, when the Crown sold the property to the current land owners. Giving Aboriginal title would nullify the current land owners title and force them to make an agreement with whichever tribe regains land title, through the courts. Remember folks, some properties have multiple land title claims against the property, from multiple 1st Nation tribes. The major question is, why has David Eby not resigned? How many times can a Premier lie to taxpayers on critical issues? David Eby knew for years he could inform private property owners who have a land title claim against their property and he chose to keep them out of the process. This was an intentional act, ensuring the BC Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cowichan land title claim, Eby is now pretending to partially oppose. How can Eby, the Federal government or the City of Richmond be counted on to fight for land title rights for current property owners, when they all conspired to omit those very property owners, from the court case? 95% of British Columbia could be impacted by the precedence the Cowichan land title ruling presents in Richmond BC. The entire city of Kamloops has a land title claim against it. So it's impossible to ignore the devastating impact this could have on almost everyone in British Columbia who owns property or who has a mortgage / reverse mortgage on their property. This is especially true if lenders begin to refuse to provide loans to people who currently have loan agreements because the risks of lenders losing their loan investments, are too great.

Bruce McGonigal

40,507 views • 9 months ago

#Bulldozer | #MP A BJP MLA from Mauganj, Madhya Pradesh, Pradeep Patel, took the law into his own hands on Nov 19, 2024 defying the Supreme Court’s directives on bulldozer justice or demolition. Patel attempted to evict residents from a plot of land in Khatkari village, where 43 families, including 7 tribal and 13 Hindu have been living for generations. Patel and right-wing groups alleged that the villagers, particularly Muslims, had encroached on land associated to the Mahadev Temple and demanded their eviction. They argued that the Revenue Court had ruled in favor of eviction from the 9 acres 27 decimal of Temple's land, yet the administration had not carried complied with the order. Advocate Anil Tiwari, who is defending the case, clarified that the 9 acres 27 decimal land does not belong to the temple as the Temple itself constructed on Revenue's land much later. It's a Govt land. When the district admin sought time to comply with the Supreme Court’s demolition guidelines after the Revenue Court ruled in favor of eviction, BJP MLA Patel allegedly went to the village with a bulldozer to demolish homes, amid religious slogans. This led to violent clashes, with arson and incidents of stone-pelting in the village. To maintain law and order, the police arrested Patel imposing a curfew in the locality. Meanwhile, villagers claimed that a mob of 25-30 people attacked their homes on Tuesday, targeting Muslims and their properties. Police lodge FIRs against 30 individuals involved in the incident. Mauganj District Magistrate Ajay Shrivastava explained that all the families were given eviction notices after the Revenue Court order. The admin ensured to comply with the Supreme Court's order and taking actions accordingly. Brushing aside BJP MLA's claims, Adv Anil Tiwari said that R/W Groups propagating that it's a Muslim village which is not true. "It's a village with a mixed population and over 30 families were given lands under different Govt schemes over the years. And some homes were built on Govt's land," he said. Instead of issuing eviction notice to only illegally built homes, the Revenue Court ordered to evict the entire village and Dist admin subsequently served eviction notices to all. "Since many residents have legal land titles, we have challenged the Revenue Court's eviction notice in the High Court and it's under review," he said. He concluded, the entire ruckus was created over lies to create anti-Muslim narrative for political gain and whatever the theatrics media is showing is different from the records.
0:45

#Bulldozer | #MP A BJP MLA from Mauganj, Madhya Pradesh, Pradeep Patel, took the law into his own hands on Nov 19, 2024 defying the Supreme Court’s directives on bulldozer justice or demolition. Patel attempted to evict residents from a plot of land in Khatkari village, where 43 families, including 7 tribal and 13 Hindu have been living for generations. Patel and right-wing groups alleged that the villagers, particularly Muslims, had encroached on land associated to the Mahadev Temple and demanded their eviction. They argued that the Revenue Court had ruled in favor of eviction from the 9 acres 27 decimal of Temple's land, yet the administration had not carried complied with the order. Advocate Anil Tiwari, who is defending the case, clarified that the 9 acres 27 decimal land does not belong to the temple as the Temple itself constructed on Revenue's land much later. It's a Govt land. When the district admin sought time to comply with the Supreme Court’s demolition guidelines after the Revenue Court ruled in favor of eviction, BJP MLA Patel allegedly went to the village with a bulldozer to demolish homes, amid religious slogans. This led to violent clashes, with arson and incidents of stone-pelting in the village. To maintain law and order, the police arrested Patel imposing a curfew in the locality. Meanwhile, villagers claimed that a mob of 25-30 people attacked their homes on Tuesday, targeting Muslims and their properties. Police lodge FIRs against 30 individuals involved in the incident. Mauganj District Magistrate Ajay Shrivastava explained that all the families were given eviction notices after the Revenue Court order. The admin ensured to comply with the Supreme Court's order and taking actions accordingly. Brushing aside BJP MLA's claims, Adv Anil Tiwari said that R/W Groups propagating that it's a Muslim village which is not true. "It's a village with a mixed population and over 30 families were given lands under different Govt schemes over the years. And some homes were built on Govt's land," he said. Instead of issuing eviction notice to only illegally built homes, the Revenue Court ordered to evict the entire village and Dist admin subsequently served eviction notices to all. "Since many residents have legal land titles, we have challenged the Revenue Court's eviction notice in the High Court and it's under review," he said. He concluded, the entire ruckus was created over lies to create anti-Muslim narrative for political gain and whatever the theatrics media is showing is different from the records.

काश/if Kakvi

35,056 views • 1 year ago

Islamization of Illinois.... Tens of thousands of Muslims packed SeatGeek Stadium for prayers at a Chicago-area mosque with deep, documented terror ties. (New Video) America’s leaders keep insisting, “we don’t want to become Europe.” Pro-tip: We already are. The Mosque Foundation of Chicago (Bridgeview Mosque) drew one of the largest Eid ul-Fitr crowds in the country, worshippers filling the stadium. What should alarm every American is who runs this mosque. Principal Imam Sheikh Jamal Said has led it since 1985. He was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case, the biggest terror-financing trial in U.S. history. The Foundation and its leaders were convicted on 108 counts for funneling over $12 million to Hamas. Court records show Said approved donations from the mosque to the group. Said also spoke at events for the Islamic Association for Palestine (a federal court-identified Hamas propaganda arm) and raised money inside the mosque for Sami Al-Arian, who later pleaded guilty to supporting Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The mosque’s former longtime imam, Kifah Mustapha (2002–2014), was a paid Holy Land Foundation fundraiser and also listed as an unindicted co-conspirator. He admitted under oath he worked as their Illinois agent while at the mosque and was identified as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee. A 2004 Chicago Tribune investigation revealed how Muslim Brotherhood hard-liners took over the mosque in the 1980s. These are the facts from federal court documents (U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation, N.D. Tex. 2008), trial exhibits, depositions, and major journalism. While politicians pretend Europe’s nightmare could never happen here, major mosques with this exact documented history are drawing tens of thousands in American cities. This is the transformation our leaders swore would never come. It’s already here. Wake up, America. Full report:
2:51

Islamization of Illinois.... Tens of thousands of Muslims packed SeatGeek Stadium for prayers at a Chicago-area mosque with deep, documented terror ties. (New Video) America’s leaders keep insisting, “we don’t want to become Europe.” Pro-tip: We already are. The Mosque Foundation of Chicago (Bridgeview Mosque) drew one of the largest Eid ul-Fitr crowds in the country, worshippers filling the stadium. What should alarm every American is who runs this mosque. Principal Imam Sheikh Jamal Said has led it since 1985. He was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case, the biggest terror-financing trial in U.S. history. The Foundation and its leaders were convicted on 108 counts for funneling over $12 million to Hamas. Court records show Said approved donations from the mosque to the group. Said also spoke at events for the Islamic Association for Palestine (a federal court-identified Hamas propaganda arm) and raised money inside the mosque for Sami Al-Arian, who later pleaded guilty to supporting Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The mosque’s former longtime imam, Kifah Mustapha (2002–2014), was a paid Holy Land Foundation fundraiser and also listed as an unindicted co-conspirator. He admitted under oath he worked as their Illinois agent while at the mosque and was identified as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestine Committee. A 2004 Chicago Tribune investigation revealed how Muslim Brotherhood hard-liners took over the mosque in the 1980s. These are the facts from federal court documents (U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation, N.D. Tex. 2008), trial exhibits, depositions, and major journalism. While politicians pretend Europe’s nightmare could never happen here, major mosques with this exact documented history are drawing tens of thousands in American cities. This is the transformation our leaders swore would never come. It’s already here. Wake up, America. Full report:

Amy Mek

129,994 views • 4 months ago

THE PRESIDENT OF AGRISA INDIRECTLY CALLS DONALD TRUMP A LIER. AGRISA REPRESENTS 99.9% WHITE AFRIKANER FARMERS SAYS THEIR IS NO CONFISCATION OF LAND IN. SOUTH AFRICA There is no persecution of any race in South Africa. Yes we have a crime problem, which government is working on. More blacks are affected by this than any other race. It’s over 30 years the ANC government has not confiscated a single piece of land. The law is very clear, if government wants land it must be willing seller and the person will get market price. If no agreement can be reached it will go to a special court and they will determine the price of the land. The lies being spread about SA is laughable no such things are happening here. I guarantee you at least 90% of the people will return. Don’t listen to anyone but Mr Jaco Minnaar is President of AGRISA who ironically represents 99.9% white farmers, he said” their no confiscation of land in South Africa. Simple terms he called Donald trump a list.
1:34

THE PRESIDENT OF AGRISA INDIRECTLY CALLS DONALD TRUMP A LIER. AGRISA REPRESENTS 99.9% WHITE AFRIKANER FARMERS SAYS THEIR IS NO CONFISCATION OF LAND IN. SOUTH AFRICA There is no persecution of any race in South Africa. Yes we have a crime problem, which government is working on. More blacks are affected by this than any other race. It’s over 30 years the ANC government has not confiscated a single piece of land. The law is very clear, if government wants land it must be willing seller and the person will get market price. If no agreement can be reached it will go to a special court and they will determine the price of the land. The lies being spread about SA is laughable no such things are happening here. I guarantee you at least 90% of the people will return. Don’t listen to anyone but Mr Jaco Minnaar is President of AGRISA who ironically represents 99.9% white farmers, he said” their no confiscation of land in South Africa. Simple terms he called Donald trump a list.

Goolam

27,556 views • 1 year ago

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."
2:34

VIDEO | Delhi: On a letter sent to the CJI against the former Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal over contempt of court, Advocate Dr. Monika Sharma says, “See, we wrote a letter to the Chief Justice of India stating the following. We stated that a very unfortunate incident has happened. Now, what is the incident? The incident is that a person who got discharged from the CBI court, good for him, when the CBI challenged the case in the High Court and certain interim directions were passed by the High Court, he said, ‘No, no, no, I don’t like those interim directions.’ So he neither appealed against that order nor filed a review or revision, but he said, ‘Change the judge, change the bench, change the court.’ And he came out openly in public about it. It was all over the media that he was saying that this judge should not hear my case and some other judge should hear my case. Now, litigants cannot decide which judge will hear their case. It is the Chief Justice of the respective High Court who decides the roster, which judge will hear civil matters and which judge will hear criminal matters. Now here he says, ‘No, no, you change the judge.’ So the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court says, ‘No, there is no reason to change the judge. We are not changing the judge.’ He goes to the Supreme Court and files a petition saying, ‘Change the judge.’ Now you see, this is a very, very dangerous trend, not only for the judicial system but for our democracy. Now here, if you don’t like the order, you’re not challenging the order, you’re challenging the judge. And that too, you’re publicly humiliating and embarrassing the judge, that is wrong. So the number of people who have signed this letter, they are former and present vice-chancellors, IPS officers, lawyers, senior advocates, bar members, the High Court Bar Association’s former president, secretary, everybody has signed this letter saying this is a wrong precedent. It undermines the status, it undermines the dignity of the judiciary. Judicial officers should be allowed to work without any political pressure, without any pressure tactics. This amounts to forum shopping and bench hunting. This should be discouraged, and this is criminal contempt of court because you are attributing motives to the judge. So we have requested the Chief Justice of India to suo motu initiate criminal contempt proceedings against this person."

Press Trust of India

99,583 views • 5 months ago

DON’T BUY LANDS IN HYDERABAD!! Because our Ministers themselves will blatantly grab your lands and no one can save you. Watch this 16 minute video. This is the evidence for my statement- This old man in the video is Satish Shah. Satish Shah’s mother purchased a land in Vattinagulapalli in 1968. From 1968 to 2025 many surveys have happened - every time it was clear that the land belonged to Satish Shah’s family. FIFTY SEVEN years, there was never a single problem. Around May 2025, Revenue Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy’s construction company Raghava Constructions bought the land adjacent to Satish Shah. And then started the most harrowing experience for Satish Shah and his family. In June 2025 Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy’s son Ponguleti Harsha Reddy gets in touch with Satish Shah. He meets him and tells that they need small portion of the land for laying a 100 feet road. Since their land is under GO 111, Satish Shah and family told Harsha they don’t want to sell the land. After two weeks, Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy himself goes to the house of Satish Shah. 🤯 The idea is to create fear psychosis. Then the third visit happens. This time Ponguleti Harsha Reddy visits their home and tells that they don’t want 2/3 acres but need the entire land. Satish Shah’s family runs a Goshala and they cultivate the land. They stood their ground and told clearly they don’t want to sell. This hurt the big ego of the big minister & his son. In 2019 land survey happened under high court direction when Satish Shah’s sister was selling her portion of the land. In 2021 land acquisition happened and the family even got compensation from the government. Around 2018-2019 boundary wall constructed Now the revenue minister wanted to use his power to manipulate the land records. He ordered a sudden survey. Satish Shah went to the court and the High Court of Telangana suspended the survey. In the intervening night of 29th-30th October, 7-8 JCBs came without number plates and all walls were demolished. Satish Shah came to know these were Raghava Construction’s JCBs and lodged a complaint to the police. He went to the court and obtained an ad-interim order. There were FIVE physical attacks on the workers by 60 goons. Power was cut. They threaten to kill and burry everyone in the same land. High court gave police protection! Four months since it’s been pending. On Ugadi again, the staff were attacked and the wall of the goshaala that was repaired was demolished again. According to Satish, the police are mute & helpless. The land next to Satish Shah’s land was acquired by Ponguleti family, and construction is being carried out under a new name NewGen Builders. Satish Shah has all documents, all legal rights, has court orders, he and his family are educated & have the resources to fight YET they live in constant fear for their lives. So - my advice! Don’t buy lands in Hyderabad and Telangana because we have land grabbers ruling us 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
16:41

DON’T BUY LANDS IN HYDERABAD!! Because our Ministers themselves will blatantly grab your lands and no one can save you. Watch this 16 minute video. This is the evidence for my statement- This old man in the video is Satish Shah. Satish Shah’s mother purchased a land in Vattinagulapalli in 1968. From 1968 to 2025 many surveys have happened - every time it was clear that the land belonged to Satish Shah’s family. FIFTY SEVEN years, there was never a single problem. Around May 2025, Revenue Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy’s construction company Raghava Constructions bought the land adjacent to Satish Shah. And then started the most harrowing experience for Satish Shah and his family. In June 2025 Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy’s son Ponguleti Harsha Reddy gets in touch with Satish Shah. He meets him and tells that they need small portion of the land for laying a 100 feet road. Since their land is under GO 111, Satish Shah and family told Harsha they don’t want to sell the land. After two weeks, Minister Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy himself goes to the house of Satish Shah. 🤯 The idea is to create fear psychosis. Then the third visit happens. This time Ponguleti Harsha Reddy visits their home and tells that they don’t want 2/3 acres but need the entire land. Satish Shah’s family runs a Goshala and they cultivate the land. They stood their ground and told clearly they don’t want to sell. This hurt the big ego of the big minister & his son. In 2019 land survey happened under high court direction when Satish Shah’s sister was selling her portion of the land. In 2021 land acquisition happened and the family even got compensation from the government. Around 2018-2019 boundary wall constructed Now the revenue minister wanted to use his power to manipulate the land records. He ordered a sudden survey. Satish Shah went to the court and the High Court of Telangana suspended the survey. In the intervening night of 29th-30th October, 7-8 JCBs came without number plates and all walls were demolished. Satish Shah came to know these were Raghava Construction’s JCBs and lodged a complaint to the police. He went to the court and obtained an ad-interim order. There were FIVE physical attacks on the workers by 60 goons. Power was cut. They threaten to kill and burry everyone in the same land. High court gave police protection! Four months since it’s been pending. On Ugadi again, the staff were attacked and the wall of the goshaala that was repaired was demolished again. According to Satish, the police are mute & helpless. The land next to Satish Shah’s land was acquired by Ponguleti family, and construction is being carried out under a new name NewGen Builders. Satish Shah has all documents, all legal rights, has court orders, he and his family are educated & have the resources to fight YET they live in constant fear for their lives. So - my advice! Don’t buy lands in Hyderabad and Telangana because we have land grabbers ruling us 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

Revathi

430,266 views • 4 months ago

They took this man’s property… not because they needed it… but because they wanted it. He built something worth roughly $400,000… his land, his investment, his future. The county steps in under eminent domain… claims it’s for a fire station. Public use. Public good. Sounds clean… sounds lawful. But watch what actually happened. They forced him out… cut him a check for $175,000. Not market value. Not fair value. Half. Then… just months later… They flip the same property. No fire station. No public use. Luxury development. And suddenly that same land is worth hundreds of thousands more… A $675,000 gain… off land they took from a private citizen under the authority of the government. That’s not development. That’s not planning. That’s conversion of private property using state power. And here’s where it gets serious… A judge steps in… looks at the facts… and says what should’ve been said from the beginning: You cannot take someone’s property under eminent domain for one purpose…and then turn around and use it for something completely different just to make money. So what happens next? The court doesn’t just slap the city on the wrist. The judge orders them to make it right. Not politically right… not cosmetically right… Legally right. That means undoing the damage… compensating based on actual value… because what was taken wasn’t just land……it was equity… leverage… opportunity… and control over one’s own future. This is what people miss about eminent domain. It’s one of the most powerful tools government has…and when it’s abused… it stops being public service and starts looking like state-sanctioned taking for profit. If the facts are as stated… the court saw it for exactly what it was. Not a mistake. A misuse of power. And that’s why the ruling hit as hard as it did. #AStoneGroove
1:40

They took this man’s property… not because they needed it… but because they wanted it. He built something worth roughly $400,000… his land, his investment, his future. The county steps in under eminent domain… claims it’s for a fire station. Public use. Public good. Sounds clean… sounds lawful. But watch what actually happened. They forced him out… cut him a check for $175,000. Not market value. Not fair value. Half. Then… just months later… They flip the same property. No fire station. No public use. Luxury development. And suddenly that same land is worth hundreds of thousands more… A $675,000 gain… off land they took from a private citizen under the authority of the government. That’s not development. That’s not planning. That’s conversion of private property using state power. And here’s where it gets serious… A judge steps in… looks at the facts… and says what should’ve been said from the beginning: You cannot take someone’s property under eminent domain for one purpose…and then turn around and use it for something completely different just to make money. So what happens next? The court doesn’t just slap the city on the wrist. The judge orders them to make it right. Not politically right… not cosmetically right… Legally right. That means undoing the damage… compensating based on actual value… because what was taken wasn’t just land……it was equity… leverage… opportunity… and control over one’s own future. This is what people miss about eminent domain. It’s one of the most powerful tools government has…and when it’s abused… it stops being public service and starts looking like state-sanctioned taking for profit. If the facts are as stated… the court saw it for exactly what it was. Not a mistake. A misuse of power. And that’s why the ruling hit as hard as it did. #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

197,320 views • 5 months ago

There is widespread misinformation being spread about the Aravalli mining order, so let’s put the verified facts on record. A clarification has been issued by the Press Information Bureau, based directly on the judgment of the Supreme Court of India. First, this Supreme Court order was not passed to destroy the Aravallis, but to protect them. For years, multiple cases of illegal and unregulated mining were coming to the Court because different States were using different definitions of what counts as an Aravalli hill or range. Now the most important fact. The so-called 100-metre rule is not new. It was decided by a Rajasthan State Committee in 2002 and implemented in 2006. Under this rule, any landform rising 100 metres or more above surrounding land is treated as a hill, and mining is banned not just on the hilltop but also on its slopes, treating the entire hill as one ecological unit. The expert committee appointed by the Supreme Court found that Rajasthan was the only State with a clear, legally notified and scientific definition. Because of this, Gujarat, Haryana and the Delhi region agreed to adopt the same rule, along with stronger safeguards, so that one uniform standard applies across the entire Aravalli belt. Another major misinformation is that mining is now allowed below 100 metres. This is false. Many areas below 100 metres are still part of protected hills, connected ranges, wildlife corridors and eco-sensitive zones, where mining remains prohibited. For the first time, entire Aravalli ranges, meaning groups of nearby hills and the land between them, are being treated as one protected ecological system, so slopes and foothills cannot be mined separately. Finally, the Supreme Court has imposed a temporary stay on all new mining leases in the Aravalli region until a comprehensive Sustainable Mining Management Plan is prepared. Existing mines can continue only under strict environmental compliance. In short, the rule was old, the protection has been strengthened, and fresh mining has been paused, not expanded.
2:58

There is widespread misinformation being spread about the Aravalli mining order, so let’s put the verified facts on record. A clarification has been issued by the Press Information Bureau, based directly on the judgment of the Supreme Court of India. First, this Supreme Court order was not passed to destroy the Aravallis, but to protect them. For years, multiple cases of illegal and unregulated mining were coming to the Court because different States were using different definitions of what counts as an Aravalli hill or range. Now the most important fact. The so-called 100-metre rule is not new. It was decided by a Rajasthan State Committee in 2002 and implemented in 2006. Under this rule, any landform rising 100 metres or more above surrounding land is treated as a hill, and mining is banned not just on the hilltop but also on its slopes, treating the entire hill as one ecological unit. The expert committee appointed by the Supreme Court found that Rajasthan was the only State with a clear, legally notified and scientific definition. Because of this, Gujarat, Haryana and the Delhi region agreed to adopt the same rule, along with stronger safeguards, so that one uniform standard applies across the entire Aravalli belt. Another major misinformation is that mining is now allowed below 100 metres. This is false. Many areas below 100 metres are still part of protected hills, connected ranges, wildlife corridors and eco-sensitive zones, where mining remains prohibited. For the first time, entire Aravalli ranges, meaning groups of nearby hills and the land between them, are being treated as one protected ecological system, so slopes and foothills cannot be mined separately. Finally, the Supreme Court has imposed a temporary stay on all new mining leases in the Aravalli region until a comprehensive Sustainable Mining Management Plan is prepared. Existing mines can continue only under strict environmental compliance. In short, the rule was old, the protection has been strengthened, and fresh mining has been paused, not expanded.

Praffulgarg

80,074 views • 8 months ago

🚨COURT REPORT - RYAN FIRESTONE Firestone Actual Address Dispute Leads to Shock Custody Decision at St Albans Crown Court! I attended a hearing today at St Albans Crown Court involving Ryan Firestone - and what unfolded in court was unexpected. A dispute over something as basic as his address ultimately resulted in Ryan being remanded in custody until Monday’s hearing. Presiding over the hearing was Judge Mann. From the public gallery, I have to say I was surprised to see how the hearing unfolded, particularly the decision to keep Ryan in custody until next week. The issue centred on the address Ryan had previously given the court. Judge Mann raised concerns that the address appeared to be a business or office address rather than a residential one, and pressed Ryan to explain where he actually lives. Ryan told the court the office address is currently the only place he is able to stay and receive correspondence. Without it, he explained, he would effectively have nowhere else to stay. Ryan also told the court he owns a separate residential property outright, but said he has been unable to live there. According to Ryan, every time he has attempted to return to that property he has been faced with possible arrest, preventing him from accessing the home. “I would like nothing more than to go back to that house,” he told the court. When the address of that property was checked during the hearing, information suggested the house had apparently been sold last July. Ryan strongly disputed that claim and said he holds Land Registry documents confirming the property is still in his name, although he did not have the documents with him in court. He asked whether he could access his email to retrieve the documents there and then, but that request was not granted. The court also questioned Ryan about council tax, utilities and residency at the property. At one stage Ryan attempted to show the court his driving licence displaying the address he currently uses, but the judge declined to review it and expressed surprise that the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) would issue a licence linked to what appeared to be a business premises. Judge Mann also questioned why the address had not been properly verified at a previous hearing, expressing some surprise that the issue had not already been resolved earlier in proceedings. Ryan then asked the judge directly whether, if he could provide Land Registry proof of ownership at the next hearing, the court would consider issuing an order allowing him to return to the property he says he owns. The judge indicated that if ownership were proven, such an order could be considered. However, the hearing concluded with the court ruling that Ryan would remain in custody until Monday at 10am, while checks are carried out regarding the property and its ownership. The prosecution were directed to make enquiries before the case returns to court. Watching from the public gallery, one question stood out: If someone cannot currently access their home, what address are they expected to give the court if the only place they can stay is a business premises? The case returns to court Monday morning, where the ownership of the disputed property is expected to be clarified. I’ll continue to follow developments. #Lawfare #TwoTierJustice
2:54

🚨COURT REPORT - RYAN FIRESTONE Firestone Actual Address Dispute Leads to Shock Custody Decision at St Albans Crown Court! I attended a hearing today at St Albans Crown Court involving Ryan Firestone - and what unfolded in court was unexpected. A dispute over something as basic as his address ultimately resulted in Ryan being remanded in custody until Monday’s hearing. Presiding over the hearing was Judge Mann. From the public gallery, I have to say I was surprised to see how the hearing unfolded, particularly the decision to keep Ryan in custody until next week. The issue centred on the address Ryan had previously given the court. Judge Mann raised concerns that the address appeared to be a business or office address rather than a residential one, and pressed Ryan to explain where he actually lives. Ryan told the court the office address is currently the only place he is able to stay and receive correspondence. Without it, he explained, he would effectively have nowhere else to stay. Ryan also told the court he owns a separate residential property outright, but said he has been unable to live there. According to Ryan, every time he has attempted to return to that property he has been faced with possible arrest, preventing him from accessing the home. “I would like nothing more than to go back to that house,” he told the court. When the address of that property was checked during the hearing, information suggested the house had apparently been sold last July. Ryan strongly disputed that claim and said he holds Land Registry documents confirming the property is still in his name, although he did not have the documents with him in court. He asked whether he could access his email to retrieve the documents there and then, but that request was not granted. The court also questioned Ryan about council tax, utilities and residency at the property. At one stage Ryan attempted to show the court his driving licence displaying the address he currently uses, but the judge declined to review it and expressed surprise that the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) would issue a licence linked to what appeared to be a business premises. Judge Mann also questioned why the address had not been properly verified at a previous hearing, expressing some surprise that the issue had not already been resolved earlier in proceedings. Ryan then asked the judge directly whether, if he could provide Land Registry proof of ownership at the next hearing, the court would consider issuing an order allowing him to return to the property he says he owns. The judge indicated that if ownership were proven, such an order could be considered. However, the hearing concluded with the court ruling that Ryan would remain in custody until Monday at 10am, while checks are carried out regarding the property and its ownership. The prosecution were directed to make enquiries before the case returns to court. Watching from the public gallery, one question stood out: If someone cannot currently access their home, what address are they expected to give the court if the only place they can stay is a business premises? The case returns to court Monday morning, where the ownership of the disputed property is expected to be clarified. I’ll continue to follow developments. #Lawfare #TwoTierJustice

Gauci Reports

15,381 views • 5 months ago

Earlier today. I visited Ilesan Jakande housing estate, were the lawless APC demolition government has once again struck to increase the suffering of Lagosians despite a court order placing an injunction against the demolition. I saw the "Task force" operatives beat innocent residents like Engineer Maro to Coma as well as several others all to grab land for developers to build UNaffordable housing which only increases the number of homeless youth and worsen the cost of living crisis. The brazen daylight rape of citizen rights carried out by the APC lagos government must be resisted. Thugs, dressed as task force operatives even had the audacity to threaten to harm me and then fired tear gas at me. This is the thugocracy that the APC government has reduced Lagos to. A government of lawless land grabbers and thugs that rely on violence to secure their power. How long will we continue this anti-poor wicked governance. Landlords were made homeless overnight or were offered 11million naira, which can barely pay a years rent in the same environs. Alhaji Jakande built housing for the poor, yet people that have not achieved close to what he delivered are focused on demolishing and constantly pushing the poor away, from indigenous communities to migrant ones, everyone is affected. This demolition, power drunk government has to go. #ourlagos
2:36

Earlier today. I visited Ilesan Jakande housing estate, were the lawless APC demolition government has once again struck to increase the suffering of Lagosians despite a court order placing an injunction against the demolition. I saw the "Task force" operatives beat innocent residents like Engineer Maro to Coma as well as several others all to grab land for developers to build UNaffordable housing which only increases the number of homeless youth and worsen the cost of living crisis. The brazen daylight rape of citizen rights carried out by the APC lagos government must be resisted. Thugs, dressed as task force operatives even had the audacity to threaten to harm me and then fired tear gas at me. This is the thugocracy that the APC government has reduced Lagos to. A government of lawless land grabbers and thugs that rely on violence to secure their power. How long will we continue this anti-poor wicked governance. Landlords were made homeless overnight or were offered 11million naira, which can barely pay a years rent in the same environs. Alhaji Jakande built housing for the poor, yet people that have not achieved close to what he delivered are focused on demolishing and constantly pushing the poor away, from indigenous communities to migrant ones, everyone is affected. This demolition, power drunk government has to go. #ourlagos

Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour

75,851 views • 7 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Delhi Minister Ashish Sood says, "There are 1,677 private schools in Delhi out of which 335 are on government lands... 114 schools have not been bound to take permission from the state government as per Delhi School Act 1973... We are being blamed for increasing Delhi school fees... Supreme Court passed an order in 2004 Modern School case that Delhi schools are bound to take permission from the Directorate of Education before increasing their fees... But they (AAP) got this order dismissed in 2024 in Delhi High court... Rekha Gupta will investigate the corruption in such cases where under the table money was taken... They allege that we increased Ahlcon International School's fees. This school was caught with a corruption of Rs 15 crore, and still it was given permission of 15% fee spike in the same year (2022-23) and in 2024-25, it spiked the fees by 13%... During this time, Atishi was the Chief Minister. Angel Public School increased the fees by 14% in 2022-23, but no investigation was conducted... They are naming Salwan Public School, which was caught with misappropriation of Rs 1.66 crore, increased the fees by 23.84% in 2023-24 and 14.68% in 2024-25... Lancer's Convent School also allegedly spent Rs 4 crore as corruption and it increased the fees by 34% in 2024-25 and the previous government did not conduct any investigation... All 1,677 schools must be audited while only 75 schools have been audited annually for last 10 years... For the first time, a committee will be formed under the leadership of CM Rekha Gupta and all schools will be audited and if any school fails any criterion, it will not be spared..."
13:48

#WATCH | Delhi | Delhi Minister Ashish Sood says, "There are 1,677 private schools in Delhi out of which 335 are on government lands... 114 schools have not been bound to take permission from the state government as per Delhi School Act 1973... We are being blamed for increasing Delhi school fees... Supreme Court passed an order in 2004 Modern School case that Delhi schools are bound to take permission from the Directorate of Education before increasing their fees... But they (AAP) got this order dismissed in 2024 in Delhi High court... Rekha Gupta will investigate the corruption in such cases where under the table money was taken... They allege that we increased Ahlcon International School's fees. This school was caught with a corruption of Rs 15 crore, and still it was given permission of 15% fee spike in the same year (2022-23) and in 2024-25, it spiked the fees by 13%... During this time, Atishi was the Chief Minister. Angel Public School increased the fees by 14% in 2022-23, but no investigation was conducted... They are naming Salwan Public School, which was caught with misappropriation of Rs 1.66 crore, increased the fees by 23.84% in 2023-24 and 14.68% in 2024-25... Lancer's Convent School also allegedly spent Rs 4 crore as corruption and it increased the fees by 34% in 2024-25 and the previous government did not conduct any investigation... All 1,677 schools must be audited while only 75 schools have been audited annually for last 10 years... For the first time, a committee will be formed under the leadership of CM Rekha Gupta and all schools will be audited and if any school fails any criterion, it will not be spared..."

ANI

126,858 views • 1 year ago

VIDEO | Lucknow: Maulana Kalbe Jawad says, “We have been fighting this battle for years, for the last 25 years. We have always opposed the DM sahib and all the illegal activities taking place here. But this time, on our appeal, many ulemas and others have also come, and we welcome and thank them for joining our movement here. The reality is that all the work being done here by the DM sahib is illegal because there should be a committee. There is supposed to be a chairman of a committee; a chairman cannot function alone. Where is the committee? The public is being deceived. When an RTI was filed, the DM sahib replied in writing that this is a private trust and therefore does not come under the RTI Act. The question is: if this property was built by the kings and selected by the government, and the DM is appointed over it, then how can it become a private trust? This clearly means the DM sahib keeps calling it a private trust to hide his own wrongdoings.” He added, “This road also belongs to the Waqf. And the ‘Lazeez Gali’ is completely illegal, and wrongly constructed. The Waqf had only given the land for development; it never said shops could be built there. Development does not mean constructing shops and selling them off. Whatever shops have been built there are all illegal and unauthorised.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -
1:50

VIDEO | Lucknow: Maulana Kalbe Jawad says, “We have been fighting this battle for years, for the last 25 years. We have always opposed the DM sahib and all the illegal activities taking place here. But this time, on our appeal, many ulemas and others have also come, and we welcome and thank them for joining our movement here. The reality is that all the work being done here by the DM sahib is illegal because there should be a committee. There is supposed to be a chairman of a committee; a chairman cannot function alone. Where is the committee? The public is being deceived. When an RTI was filed, the DM sahib replied in writing that this is a private trust and therefore does not come under the RTI Act. The question is: if this property was built by the kings and selected by the government, and the DM is appointed over it, then how can it become a private trust? This clearly means the DM sahib keeps calling it a private trust to hide his own wrongdoings.” He added, “This road also belongs to the Waqf. And the ‘Lazeez Gali’ is completely illegal, and wrongly constructed. The Waqf had only given the land for development; it never said shops could be built there. Development does not mean constructing shops and selling them off. Whatever shops have been built there are all illegal and unauthorised.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

110,039 views • 3 months ago