Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Started to get hard, need some place to put this dick. #hungdaddy #bigdickdad #bigdick #bigcockdad #fatcock #fatdick #thickcock #thickdick #hungbear #hung #daddydick #bigdickman #dadcock #bwc #wellendowed #teambigdick #bigdickclub #jeansbulge #501bulge #levis #levisbulge

Scruffy Dad

116,675 subscribers

29,845 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Lady Gaga reflects on her 2016 album, Joanne, and how it’s different from MAYHEM: “I think that was a hard time for some of my fans, because it felt so different from the “me” that they knew. But it felt so needed for me. It was like I just wanted to strip everything away. I just wanted to understand and get much closer to who I was before it all. It’s so interesting because it’s the most stripped-away that people feel that they’ve ever seen me, but I know how far away from me I was. On this record, I’m much more confident and sure of who I am. I also didn’t feel the need to completely reinvent every part of who I am, because I’ve started to become proud of who I am and feeling like I can own my personal approach to pop music, my style, my vision, that these are things that I made that belong to me, and that I don’t have to put so much pressure on myself to be somebody else, to be great.”

Lady Gaga reflects on her 2016 album, Joanne, and how it’s different from MAYHEM: “I think that was a hard time for some of my fans, because it felt so different from the “me” that they knew. But it felt so needed for me. It was like I just wanted to strip everything away. I just wanted to understand and get much closer to who I was before it all. It’s so interesting because it’s the most stripped-away that people feel that they’ve ever seen me, but I know how far away from me I was. On this record, I’m much more confident and sure of who I am. I also didn’t feel the need to completely reinvent every part of who I am, because I’ve started to become proud of who I am and feeling like I can own my personal approach to pop music, my style, my vision, that these are things that I made that belong to me, and that I don’t have to put so much pressure on myself to be somebody else, to be great.”

Gaga Daily

229,356 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"The current administration was put into place by the bankers to get the control grid accomplished... [and] it's not technocracy—it's slavery." "Both the Democratic and Republican side do not see the digital concentration camps snapping into place around them...." Former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts) describes for Paul Buitink (Paul Buitink 🎙) how the current Trump administration has been brought in by "the bankers" in order "to get the control grid accomplished." Fitts notes that "both the Democratic and Republican side do not see the digital concentration camps snapping into place around them, and it's shocking." ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "And I would say that the current administration was put into place by the bankers to get the control grid accomplished. The last group couldn't accomplish the control grid. This group is doing a remarkable job of implementing the control grid at high speed, and marketing it. And I would say both the Democratic and Republican side do not see the digital concentration camps snapping into place around them, and it's shocking. "It's not technocracy. It's slavery. I mean, it's, you know, I think it'll have a different face and feeling in Europe than in the United States, but in the United States, we're talking about slavery. And we're talking about, you know, I have said that if you look at the, you know, one of the reasons we can get rid of USAID is we don't need soft power anymore because with drones and robots and invisible weaponry and surveillance systems, you know, we can use hard power very cheaply and economically. "And if you look at some of the things that have been happening in the United States with using hard power to basically kill people and take their lands, you know, this is very dangerous."

"The current administration was put into place by the bankers to get the control grid accomplished... [and] it's not technocracy—it's slavery." "Both the Democratic and Republican side do not see the digital concentration camps snapping into place around them...." Former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts) describes for Paul Buitink (Paul Buitink 🎙) how the current Trump administration has been brought in by "the bankers" in order "to get the control grid accomplished." Fitts notes that "both the Democratic and Republican side do not see the digital concentration camps snapping into place around them, and it's shocking." ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "And I would say that the current administration was put into place by the bankers to get the control grid accomplished. The last group couldn't accomplish the control grid. This group is doing a remarkable job of implementing the control grid at high speed, and marketing it. And I would say both the Democratic and Republican side do not see the digital concentration camps snapping into place around them, and it's shocking. "It's not technocracy. It's slavery. I mean, it's, you know, I think it'll have a different face and feeling in Europe than in the United States, but in the United States, we're talking about slavery. And we're talking about, you know, I have said that if you look at the, you know, one of the reasons we can get rid of USAID is we don't need soft power anymore because with drones and robots and invisible weaponry and surveillance systems, you know, we can use hard power very cheaply and economically. "And if you look at some of the things that have been happening in the United States with using hard power to basically kill people and take their lands, you know, this is very dangerous."

Sense Receptor

16,867 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

NEW: Los Angeles Resident says ICE protests are getting worse not better “They're trying to make it seem like Los Angeles under control and not under siege — They're f*cking lying to you” “So I live in the heart of downtown Los Angeles and I live where all these ICE protests are currently happening. And I've been talking about them since they first started. Let me tell you, it's not getting better. Don't listen to the media. They're f*cking lying to you. They're trying to make it seem like Los Angeles under control and not under siege. It is under siege, okay. I woke up today and more businesses were looted, robbed, destroyed, cars burned, bricks thrown, fucking graffiti all over the walls. Our fucking city is under siege. It is in no way under control This is the typical left wing narrative bullsh*t that, that they're trying to show you the peaceful side of the protest on TV. Only maybe fucking 10 or 15% of it is peaceful. The rest of it is a bunch of psychopaths in f*cking masks and fucking leaf blowers in hand and fucking helmets on fucking hard hats thinking that they're going to some type of f*cking war, when in all reality they're just a bunch of immature assholes that are unemployed who just want to bring destruction to the f*cking city and want to rob everybody because they're angry at themselves, because their life sucks and they can't accept that their shortcomings are simply because they're failures. And we have to deal with this. So in order for this to stop, we need to put in some type of curfew and the curfew needs to be noon. You want to protest, you can protest in the morning from 7am to noon or 8am to fucking noon, and then that's it. You're on the street, you get detained, you get taken into custody. This needs to stop. We cannot have LA turn into some crazy shithole with a bunch of criminals who are not doing this to help illegals. They're doing this so they could rob and destroy the city.”

NEW: Los Angeles Resident says ICE protests are getting worse not better “They're trying to make it seem like Los Angeles under control and not under siege — They're fcking lying to you” “So I live in the heart of downtown Los Angeles and I live where all these ICE protests are currently happening. And I've been talking about them since they first started. Let me tell you, it's not getting better. Don't listen to the media. They're fcking lying to you. They're trying to make it seem like Los Angeles under control and not under siege. It is under siege, okay. I woke up today and more businesses were looted, robbed, destroyed, cars burned, bricks thrown, fucking graffiti all over the walls. Our fucking city is under siege. It is in no way under control This is the typical left wing narrative bullsht that, that they're trying to show you the peaceful side of the protest on TV. Only maybe fucking 10 or 15% of it is peaceful. The rest of it is a bunch of psychopaths in fcking masks and fucking leaf blowers in hand and fucking helmets on fucking hard hats thinking that they're going to some type of fcking war, when in all reality they're just a bunch of immature assholes that are unemployed who just want to bring destruction to the fcking city and want to rob everybody because they're angry at themselves, because their life sucks and they can't accept that their shortcomings are simply because they're failures. And we have to deal with this. So in order for this to stop, we need to put in some type of curfew and the curfew needs to be noon. You want to protest, you can protest in the morning from 7am to noon or 8am to fucking noon, and then that's it. You're on the street, you get detained, you get taken into custody. This needs to stop. We cannot have LA turn into some crazy shithole with a bunch of criminals who are not doing this to help illegals. They're doing this so they could rob and destroy the city.”

Wall Street Apes

51,302 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Idea of NHI on Earth. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔥"The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified." ~Dr. Phil 🔥 "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious?" ~BZ to Dr. Phil (I'm so glad Bryce went there.) "There will be people...who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening." ~Mellon ~ Dr. Phil: "We know in the last 80 years there have been no overt hostile acts that we know about. That doesn't mean there could be things happening that are attributable to these forces that we don't know about. But, we certainly don't have any attacks that we can attribute to these UAPs or whatever." (Well, there's Colares in 1977. If that was non-human in nature, I'd say that qualifies as overt. And the Thomas Mantell incident in 1948 where he crashed and died after pursuing a UFO. Was that overt? Unfortunately, we don't know what happened and probably never will.) Dr. Phil: "And if the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, I think people can take some comfort in knowing that if they were gonna melt us with a ray gun or something of that nature, they've had ample opportunity to do that. "They may have been here 1000 years before we were here. Who knows what the situation is? But we do know that as long as we've been monitoring this and tracking it, there have been no overt hostile acts and I think people can take some comfort in that, and should." (See the work of Peter Levenda for a deeper look at that. "They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them... What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? ~Peter Levenda More... ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~ (I'm glad Bryce pushed back a bit.) Bryce Zabel: "They should. The only thing I would say is, if we're dealing with a non-human intelligence - or an NHI, as we like to say now - we'd have to assume that they think differently than us. So even in our own world, in the United States, we tend to think in four-year terms because of presidential terms, right? So you can't get something off the ground if it can't get done right away. The Chinese may think in 100-year terms when they think about Taiwan or whatever. "It's possible there are alien or non-human intelligences that think in a different time frame. If their time frame was 1000 years, then they could just be getting started. "And on the topic of the nuclear issue, which I share concern of. I mean, I think the nuclear issue means it is at least a national-security issue of some kind. Now, I've heard people talk about this, Dr. Phil, two different ways. Some people say, 'Well, you know, they're looking at our nuclear capabilities because they want to protect us from ourselves.' "Okay, that's great, I hope that's true. But the other would be: what do you do before you actually go to war with anybody, is you do reconnaissance. You try to find out what the other guy has. What are their assets? What are their capabilities?" (That may freak out some people but all angles should be considered.) Zabel: "So, I think the problem that we need to overcome in this country is getting to a place where we understand this phenomenon that we're encountering enough that we can at least start to figure out intent. What is the intent? "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious? What is it? And so, we got a lot of work to do, and I think that's why I am so supportive of your current efforts because you're, basically, saying, 'Let's get started, people. Let's really take this seriously. Let's quit fooling around and stigmatizing people that want to take it seriously, and let's get to work.' But let's get to work as a human race. Let's start sharing what we know and let's make progress. That's where I'm coming from, too." (Bringing up abductions is important because it IS part of this discussion and it shouldn't be avoided. Kudos to Bryce!) Dr. Phil: "I saw a study that said 71% of Americans believe that there are aliens that have been or are in our earthly space. And it's interesting...I read that in one context, it said, 'Look, this is not going to be such a big deal if this gets verified.' "You know, there's one thing to say that in the abstract, like, 'Yeah, I think yeah probably there are.' It's a whole other different situation if you turn around and see somebody standing there. The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified. (100%. That's my favorite part of the interview and it's so true.) Dr. Phil: "And I hope that we are going to put enough context around this, particularly knowing that there are segments of our population that are very vulnerable. There are some elderly folks that aren't up on technology and might be overwhelmed by the reality of this. "We have certain populations that might be easily disoriented or destabilized in the mental emotional fringes of the population. And I worry about those that are easily exploitable. You know, you need to get out of the urban areas, buy our buried school bus in the mountains, and you'll be safe forever. You know the con artists and the scammers are going to find every opportunity to prey upon those that are concerned and worried about this. "And I think we need to be prepared to take care of those that might be destabilized by this information that's coming out right now, we can't pretend they aren't there. We've made those mistakes in the past, like during COVID, for example. There are those that are more impacted than others, and we need to be prepared to handle that." Christopher K. Mellon: "We, recently, commissioned a study by a group of six psychologists, PhD psychologists, on this topic of how the public would receive this information. And it was generally very encouraging. And what they found was that the great bulk of the population, as they have in the past with other epical changes such as the Copernican principle, or evolution, or general relativity, it takes people a while to process this information. There's a period of resistance. But most people will get up, get out of bed, go to work the next day. They're not devastated, even though there's nothing quite comparable to this, perhaps." (There's no perhaps. A government or respected figure admitting that we're not alone on this planet would be unprecedented and there is NOTHING we can compare it to.) Mellon: "What the study did find is that there is likely, however, to be a subset of people, maybe 15% of the population, that are going to need some help. And that we are not necessarily prepared in our present state to provide that kind of assistance, and we need to be doing more to get ready for that." (If he's talking world population, that's about 1.2 BILLION people who are going to need some help dealing with this. Holy crap. 😬) Mellon: "And also, to work on the messaging. The messaging is so important, clear and consistent messaging from the government, trying to develop trust with the American people so that the information is is accepted and acted on." (For me, I want the whole truth more than the right "message.") Mellon: "A lot of the difference will be people who can't get their head around it, even though they really understand it. But because of their own belief structure, the architecture of their own belief structure, for some reason, in their particular individual case, it's particularly threatening or disruptive. "So there will be people who fall into that category, according to this study, who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening."

The Idea of NHI on Earth. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔥"The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified." ~Dr. Phil 🔥 "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious?" ~BZ to Dr. Phil (I'm so glad Bryce went there.) "There will be people...who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening." ~Mellon ~ Dr. Phil: "We know in the last 80 years there have been no overt hostile acts that we know about. That doesn't mean there could be things happening that are attributable to these forces that we don't know about. But, we certainly don't have any attacks that we can attribute to these UAPs or whatever." (Well, there's Colares in 1977. If that was non-human in nature, I'd say that qualifies as overt. And the Thomas Mantell incident in 1948 where he crashed and died after pursuing a UFO. Was that overt? Unfortunately, we don't know what happened and probably never will.) Dr. Phil: "And if the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, I think people can take some comfort in knowing that if they were gonna melt us with a ray gun or something of that nature, they've had ample opportunity to do that. "They may have been here 1000 years before we were here. Who knows what the situation is? But we do know that as long as we've been monitoring this and tracking it, there have been no overt hostile acts and I think people can take some comfort in that, and should." (See the work of Peter Levenda for a deeper look at that. "They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them... What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? ~Peter Levenda More... ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~ (I'm glad Bryce pushed back a bit.) Bryce Zabel: "They should. The only thing I would say is, if we're dealing with a non-human intelligence - or an NHI, as we like to say now - we'd have to assume that they think differently than us. So even in our own world, in the United States, we tend to think in four-year terms because of presidential terms, right? So you can't get something off the ground if it can't get done right away. The Chinese may think in 100-year terms when they think about Taiwan or whatever. "It's possible there are alien or non-human intelligences that think in a different time frame. If their time frame was 1000 years, then they could just be getting started. "And on the topic of the nuclear issue, which I share concern of. I mean, I think the nuclear issue means it is at least a national-security issue of some kind. Now, I've heard people talk about this, Dr. Phil, two different ways. Some people say, 'Well, you know, they're looking at our nuclear capabilities because they want to protect us from ourselves.' "Okay, that's great, I hope that's true. But the other would be: what do you do before you actually go to war with anybody, is you do reconnaissance. You try to find out what the other guy has. What are their assets? What are their capabilities?" (That may freak out some people but all angles should be considered.) Zabel: "So, I think the problem that we need to overcome in this country is getting to a place where we understand this phenomenon that we're encountering enough that we can at least start to figure out intent. What is the intent? "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious? What is it? And so, we got a lot of work to do, and I think that's why I am so supportive of your current efforts because you're, basically, saying, 'Let's get started, people. Let's really take this seriously. Let's quit fooling around and stigmatizing people that want to take it seriously, and let's get to work.' But let's get to work as a human race. Let's start sharing what we know and let's make progress. That's where I'm coming from, too." (Bringing up abductions is important because it IS part of this discussion and it shouldn't be avoided. Kudos to Bryce!) Dr. Phil: "I saw a study that said 71% of Americans believe that there are aliens that have been or are in our earthly space. And it's interesting...I read that in one context, it said, 'Look, this is not going to be such a big deal if this gets verified.' "You know, there's one thing to say that in the abstract, like, 'Yeah, I think yeah probably there are.' It's a whole other different situation if you turn around and see somebody standing there. The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified. (100%. That's my favorite part of the interview and it's so true.) Dr. Phil: "And I hope that we are going to put enough context around this, particularly knowing that there are segments of our population that are very vulnerable. There are some elderly folks that aren't up on technology and might be overwhelmed by the reality of this. "We have certain populations that might be easily disoriented or destabilized in the mental emotional fringes of the population. And I worry about those that are easily exploitable. You know, you need to get out of the urban areas, buy our buried school bus in the mountains, and you'll be safe forever. You know the con artists and the scammers are going to find every opportunity to prey upon those that are concerned and worried about this. "And I think we need to be prepared to take care of those that might be destabilized by this information that's coming out right now, we can't pretend they aren't there. We've made those mistakes in the past, like during COVID, for example. There are those that are more impacted than others, and we need to be prepared to handle that." Christopher K. Mellon: "We, recently, commissioned a study by a group of six psychologists, PhD psychologists, on this topic of how the public would receive this information. And it was generally very encouraging. And what they found was that the great bulk of the population, as they have in the past with other epical changes such as the Copernican principle, or evolution, or general relativity, it takes people a while to process this information. There's a period of resistance. But most people will get up, get out of bed, go to work the next day. They're not devastated, even though there's nothing quite comparable to this, perhaps." (There's no perhaps. A government or respected figure admitting that we're not alone on this planet would be unprecedented and there is NOTHING we can compare it to.) Mellon: "What the study did find is that there is likely, however, to be a subset of people, maybe 15% of the population, that are going to need some help. And that we are not necessarily prepared in our present state to provide that kind of assistance, and we need to be doing more to get ready for that." (If he's talking world population, that's about 1.2 BILLION people who are going to need some help dealing with this. Holy crap. 😬) Mellon: "And also, to work on the messaging. The messaging is so important, clear and consistent messaging from the government, trying to develop trust with the American people so that the information is is accepted and acted on." (For me, I want the whole truth more than the right "message.") Mellon: "A lot of the difference will be people who can't get their head around it, even though they really understand it. But because of their own belief structure, the architecture of their own belief structure, for some reason, in their particular individual case, it's particularly threatening or disruptive. "So there will be people who fall into that category, according to this study, who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening."

Joe Murgia

29,763 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The bankers [have] put Trump in to get the control grid for them... [but] everybody wants... their own control grid. The Chinese and the Russians don't want the City of London controlling their CBDC... [so these powers are] fighting with each other." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with CapitalCosm (CapitalCosm) posted to YouTube on January 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "What happened was, when the administration came in, I had said in 2024, the bankers are going to put Trump in to get the control grid for them. And in fact, that's what happened. But it was moving so quickly, Danny, I literally, I would do an interview like this, and I couldn't remember all the things he'd done last week. They were moving so fast. "So we just started to make a collection and I could send people and see it, but it's remarkable the speed. They're moving in three areas. One, they're trying to get a digital ID through the REAL ID system. Two, they're trying to get programmable money. And instead of starting with CBDC, there's too much backlash against that. They want to do stablecoins and asset tokens, making it programmable and do it that way. And then I think down the road they'll do CBDCs once they get that going. And then the third is they have to put the local infrastructure. So they need the Flock cameras, they need the increased telecom override of local whatever, and all sorts of hard infrastructure, including the data centers. And now, as people can see that, they're beginning to push back. Now, are they ready to implement the control grid? No, but they're on their way. "And is it too late? Can we stop it? Yes, we can stop it. And one of the reasons we can stop it is if you look at all the people who are building it and financing it, it's us, right? So they're a small group of people. "And, one of the things I'm seeing, at least in the local areas, the more people realize, you know, when I first tried to warn people about the control grid, people of means truly believed, oh, I don't need to worry about that. I have enough money. I can, you know, my money will solve the problem. "And when I was working on Wall Street, that was true. You can make enough money, and then the tyranny and the corruption wouldn't. Couldn't get to you. You could protect yourself and work around it. Right? Okay, but now we're talking about a system. When it locks into place, I can have five gazillion dollars and they can just take it. "I mean, that's what happened to me in 1998. I remember it well. So, this is a whole different model. And what I'm seeing are more and more people saying, wait a minute. You know, this kills the goose that lays the golden egg. I'm not going in for this. Now that model is being snapped into place all around the world. "And the fights you see are not, you know, the BRICS saying, we want to be free, and the Empire saying, we want to do the control grid. Everybody wants to, to control their own control grid. You know, they, the, the Chinese and the Russians don't want the City of London controlling their CBDC. Do you know what I mean? So, now here's what's funny. The worse this gets, the more they start fighting with each other."

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The bankers [have] put Trump in to get the control grid for them... [but] everybody wants... their own control grid. The Chinese and the Russians don't want the City of London controlling their CBDC... [so these powers are] fighting with each other." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with CapitalCosm (CapitalCosm) posted to YouTube on January 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "What happened was, when the administration came in, I had said in 2024, the bankers are going to put Trump in to get the control grid for them. And in fact, that's what happened. But it was moving so quickly, Danny, I literally, I would do an interview like this, and I couldn't remember all the things he'd done last week. They were moving so fast. "So we just started to make a collection and I could send people and see it, but it's remarkable the speed. They're moving in three areas. One, they're trying to get a digital ID through the REAL ID system. Two, they're trying to get programmable money. And instead of starting with CBDC, there's too much backlash against that. They want to do stablecoins and asset tokens, making it programmable and do it that way. And then I think down the road they'll do CBDCs once they get that going. And then the third is they have to put the local infrastructure. So they need the Flock cameras, they need the increased telecom override of local whatever, and all sorts of hard infrastructure, including the data centers. And now, as people can see that, they're beginning to push back. Now, are they ready to implement the control grid? No, but they're on their way. "And is it too late? Can we stop it? Yes, we can stop it. And one of the reasons we can stop it is if you look at all the people who are building it and financing it, it's us, right? So they're a small group of people. "And, one of the things I'm seeing, at least in the local areas, the more people realize, you know, when I first tried to warn people about the control grid, people of means truly believed, oh, I don't need to worry about that. I have enough money. I can, you know, my money will solve the problem. "And when I was working on Wall Street, that was true. You can make enough money, and then the tyranny and the corruption wouldn't. Couldn't get to you. You could protect yourself and work around it. Right? Okay, but now we're talking about a system. When it locks into place, I can have five gazillion dollars and they can just take it. "I mean, that's what happened to me in 1998. I remember it well. So, this is a whole different model. And what I'm seeing are more and more people saying, wait a minute. You know, this kills the goose that lays the golden egg. I'm not going in for this. Now that model is being snapped into place all around the world. "And the fights you see are not, you know, the BRICS saying, we want to be free, and the Empire saying, we want to do the control grid. Everybody wants to, to control their own control grid. You know, they, the, the Chinese and the Russians don't want the City of London controlling their CBDC. Do you know what I mean? So, now here's what's funny. The worse this gets, the more they start fighting with each other."

Sense Receptor

34,024 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Back in January when Megan and I charted out the year, the dream of the Leadville 100 course record was overwhelming. But big dreams should be overwhelming. It was time to get to work. Our plan started from 3 principles: 1. I’d need to be capable of running a 13:xx 5k at altitude, or around sub-4 min mile fitness. 6-minute mile pace would need to be a jog on race day, and that all came from improving my running economy. 2. I had to get stronger to handle the unknown distance, both in terms of threshold climbing and actual muscular strength. 3. I’d have to run every step of the race, including Hope Pass. Most interestingly, none of those goals required lots of training volume. I did 8-12 hours of aerobic training most weeks with very few doubles given life constraints, usually around 60-75 miles of running and 1-2 bike rides (pulsing up and down for adaptations, with some bigger weeks and a longer down period for my accident). You don’t need to do consistent 100+ mile weeks to be good at this sport. I have been building endurance bricks for 18 years, and every brick counts. With that time, we applied 6 ideas: 1. Most weeks had a speed workout (often pacing Allie Ostrander ahead of the Olympic Trials 🔥), culminating in 12 x 400 on short rest in 63-64 seconds at altitude in June 2. I’d do threshold sessions approximately every other week, often on the uphill treadmill at 8% or 15% grade, culminating in a massive 12 x 5 minute session a few weeks before race day 3. I did uphill treadmill runs in Z2 at 20% grade all year, including for 10 min after as many aerobic runs as I could 4. I did 3-4 days of strides every single week. My strength is my speed. 5. I biked once per week in place of a run, often using Zwift races for hard sessions (A+ racing category in Zwift!) 6. Every week, I did Ultra Legs strength + squats and took a rest day, plus did heat training Big takeaway: you don’t need to do wild volume to have success in ultras. Get fast, stay fast year round, spend time in Z2, and stack some fun bricks in the context of your life. The record may have shocked the ultra world. But as Megan said, it only shocked people who haven’t been following my Strava for the last decade 🧡

Back in January when Megan and I charted out the year, the dream of the Leadville 100 course record was overwhelming. But big dreams should be overwhelming. It was time to get to work. Our plan started from 3 principles: 1. I’d need to be capable of running a 13:xx 5k at altitude, or around sub-4 min mile fitness. 6-minute mile pace would need to be a jog on race day, and that all came from improving my running economy. 2. I had to get stronger to handle the unknown distance, both in terms of threshold climbing and actual muscular strength. 3. I’d have to run every step of the race, including Hope Pass. Most interestingly, none of those goals required lots of training volume. I did 8-12 hours of aerobic training most weeks with very few doubles given life constraints, usually around 60-75 miles of running and 1-2 bike rides (pulsing up and down for adaptations, with some bigger weeks and a longer down period for my accident). You don’t need to do consistent 100+ mile weeks to be good at this sport. I have been building endurance bricks for 18 years, and every brick counts. With that time, we applied 6 ideas: 1. Most weeks had a speed workout (often pacing Allie Ostrander ahead of the Olympic Trials 🔥), culminating in 12 x 400 on short rest in 63-64 seconds at altitude in June 2. I’d do threshold sessions approximately every other week, often on the uphill treadmill at 8% or 15% grade, culminating in a massive 12 x 5 minute session a few weeks before race day 3. I did uphill treadmill runs in Z2 at 20% grade all year, including for 10 min after as many aerobic runs as I could 4. I did 3-4 days of strides every single week. My strength is my speed. 5. I biked once per week in place of a run, often using Zwift races for hard sessions (A+ racing category in Zwift!) 6. Every week, I did Ultra Legs strength + squats and took a rest day, plus did heat training Big takeaway: you don’t need to do wild volume to have success in ultras. Get fast, stay fast year round, spend time in Z2, and stack some fun bricks in the context of your life. The record may have shocked the ultra world. But as Megan said, it only shocked people who haven’t been following my Strava for the last decade 🧡

David Roche

158,587 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Sharing My Journey Trading Memecoins on Solana (1 Year 4 Months In) I’ll also be doing a giveaway 0.5 SOL each to 3 lucky winners ( 48 hours ). The rules are simple: Repost and Share your trading experience on Solana (memecoins or utility coins) and tell me your biggest profit and biggest loss in the comment below. Alright, now it’s time for us to get back to the story. I wanna share my personal experience trading memecoins (and some utility plays) on Solana over the past 1 year and 4 months. Before that, I was pretty active on Ethereum since around 2020. So what made me switch to Solana ? It started when someone from my private group pointed out the potential of Solana, the speed, the low fees, and how early the ecosystem still felt at the time. Funny thing is, I actually heard about Solana when it was already at $80, but I didn’t really touch it until it hit around $100, and I started with 20 SOL as capital. It was sometime around February 2024 (don’t remember the exact date), when I first tried trading memecoins on Solana. Back then, wasn’t even popping yet, most devs were still launching manually. No fancy bots, no real token scanners, just pure risk. ( Correct me if I’m wrong about when first launched. ) Honestly, in the beginning, it was tough. New tokens popping up every second, rugs left and right, Solana was in hype mode, and everyone wanted to launch something. But by April, things started to click. I was finally making profits trading Solana coins, memecoins, lowcap utilities, all that. If I compare it to now, I’d say it was way easier back then to catch early entries. Not even exaggerating, 100x plays were way more common. I will put sneak peek of some of my PnL from my personal channel, Of course, it’s not as simple anymore with today’s market; Bundles everywhere, token farming systems, launch metas changing fast… Back then? It was cleaner. Simpler. Honestly, better. Through all this, I’ve always had one dream: To help people who are truly serious about learning the game. That’s why I started Bollish Research , a place for real ones to learn and grow in this space. From the very beginning of Bollish Academy until now, we’ve built the Bollish Research team through real work and honestly, quite a few people have been cut along the way. The older I get, the more I realize the value of staying low key… of building a tight circle and only letting the right people in. You can be open, honest, and real, but still know that not everyone deserves a seat at your table. I’ve come to realize this right now, all I want is to grind hard, make a lot of money, and make the people who’ve stood by me from day one proud. The ones who were there when I was nothing, all the way to who I am now. I wanna help people in need too, using the profits from my trading, because I’ve never had any intention of launching paid classes or any of that bullshit. So if you’re reading this, listen. Most of the time there is no support system, it's just you and your grind. So believe in yourself. Motivate yourself. Celebrate your small wins. Pray to God that you will make it. Don’t lose hope. Stay focused. Stay consistent. Be disciplined. If you wanna see my PnL, you can check it out below or you can join my Journey Channel ( ) Thanks for reading. I love you all

Sharing My Journey Trading Memecoins on Solana (1 Year 4 Months In) I’ll also be doing a giveaway 0.5 SOL each to 3 lucky winners ( 48 hours ). The rules are simple: Repost and Share your trading experience on Solana (memecoins or utility coins) and tell me your biggest profit and biggest loss in the comment below. Alright, now it’s time for us to get back to the story. I wanna share my personal experience trading memecoins (and some utility plays) on Solana over the past 1 year and 4 months. Before that, I was pretty active on Ethereum since around 2020. So what made me switch to Solana ? It started when someone from my private group pointed out the potential of Solana, the speed, the low fees, and how early the ecosystem still felt at the time. Funny thing is, I actually heard about Solana when it was already at $80, but I didn’t really touch it until it hit around $100, and I started with 20 SOL as capital. It was sometime around February 2024 (don’t remember the exact date), when I first tried trading memecoins on Solana. Back then, wasn’t even popping yet, most devs were still launching manually. No fancy bots, no real token scanners, just pure risk. ( Correct me if I’m wrong about when first launched. ) Honestly, in the beginning, it was tough. New tokens popping up every second, rugs left and right, Solana was in hype mode, and everyone wanted to launch something. But by April, things started to click. I was finally making profits trading Solana coins, memecoins, lowcap utilities, all that. If I compare it to now, I’d say it was way easier back then to catch early entries. Not even exaggerating, 100x plays were way more common. I will put sneak peek of some of my PnL from my personal channel, Of course, it’s not as simple anymore with today’s market; Bundles everywhere, token farming systems, launch metas changing fast… Back then? It was cleaner. Simpler. Honestly, better. Through all this, I’ve always had one dream: To help people who are truly serious about learning the game. That’s why I started Bollish Research , a place for real ones to learn and grow in this space. From the very beginning of Bollish Academy until now, we’ve built the Bollish Research team through real work and honestly, quite a few people have been cut along the way. The older I get, the more I realize the value of staying low key… of building a tight circle and only letting the right people in. You can be open, honest, and real, but still know that not everyone deserves a seat at your table. I’ve come to realize this right now, all I want is to grind hard, make a lot of money, and make the people who’ve stood by me from day one proud. The ones who were there when I was nothing, all the way to who I am now. I wanna help people in need too, using the profits from my trading, because I’ve never had any intention of launching paid classes or any of that bullshit. So if you’re reading this, listen. Most of the time there is no support system, it's just you and your grind. So believe in yourself. Motivate yourself. Celebrate your small wins. Pray to God that you will make it. Don’t lose hope. Stay focused. Stay consistent. Be disciplined. If you wanna see my PnL, you can check it out below or you can join my Journey Channel ( ) Thanks for reading. I love you all

Bollish

57,388 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Some Thoughts On Ukraine As the Trump administration pauses military aid to Ukraine and western liberals continue their shrieking meltdown over Trump hurting Saint Zelensky’s feelings, it’s probably worth reminding everyone that the Russian invasion of Ukraine was indisputably provoked by western aggressions. That’s why so many western experts and analysts spent years warning ahead of time that western aggressions were going to provoke an invasion of Ukraine. Now, some may hear this and say “Okay but Russia still shouldn’t have invaded even though our western leaders were aggressively provoking them to.” But before you do that it might be a good idea to look inside yourself and ask where that impulse is arising from. Why are you so eager to skip past the part where you criticize your own rulers for their role in starting this war and focus solely on criticizing the leader of an eastern government who has no power over you? What is it inside of you that’s flailing all over the place trying to avoid any forceful scrutiny of the reckless warmongering of your own government and its allies? The last time a foreign rival placed a credible military threat near the border of the United States, the US responded so aggressively that the world almost ended (if you want to know just how close we came to nuclear annihilation during the Cuban Missile Crisis, look up the name Vasili Arkhipov). Western liberals have been conditioned to insist that Russia should have responded differently to the US empire amassing proxy forces on its border than the US would respond to the same kind of threat on its own borders. The frenetic mental contortions needed to justify this ridiculous double standard are only possible because the west is saturated in domestic propaganda manipulating the way they think about the world. It makes sense for there to be criticism of Russia for its role in this war, and for people to be horrified by the nightmare that’s been happening in Ukraine these last few years. What makes absolutely no sense whatsoever is for western liberals (or “progressives” or whatever they want to call themselves) to assign ZERO PERCENT RESPONSIBILITY to their own government and its allies for their extensively documented role in sparking this conflict and ONE HUNDRED PERCENT RESPONSIBILITY to a foreign government with no power over them. That’s pathetic, bootlicking behavior, and it’s utterly inexcusable. Stop performing mental gymnastics to defend the abuses of your rulers. Have a little dignity for god’s sake. It is good that Trump appears to be moving toward ending an unwinnable proxy war that Ukrainians no longer want to fight. Anyone who disagrees with this is a dogshit human being. I am not grateful to Trump for ending this nightmare, I’m just disgusted with anyone who’s against doing so. The proxy war in Ukraine was going to end sometime relatively soon anyway; the only way for NATO to reverse Russia’s steady gains at this point would be to intervene more directly in ways that would risk nuclear consequences that western leaders aren’t willing to receive. This was always a chess game for them; they’re not going to put their own necks on the line. So the war had to end — the Trumpists are just the faction that the empire has tasked with advancing this agenda. I will not waste any gratitude on Trump rolling back a failed imperial bid to weaken Russia, but I will absolutely scream my fucking lungs out at anyone who insists Ukrainians should keep throwing their bodies into a war that Ukrainians themselves no longer support. If you want the Ukraine war to continue, then go enlist and put your body on the line so that Ukrainians don’t have to. The Ukrainian Foreign Legion is still accepting volunteers. If you want this horrific war to continue, either go and fight or shut the fuck up. Stop tweeting from the sofa in your safe, comfortable home and get your ass to the frontline. Bring along as many western liberals as you can convince to join your cause. The western empire provoked this war. The western empire sabotaged peace talks in the early weeks after the invasion. They refused off-ramp after off-ramp in pushing Ukraine into this situation, and as a result Ukraine is going to be much worse off than before this all started. Wanting Ukraine to keep throwing human lives into the meat grinder in the hopes that they can recover all their lost territory is just sunk cost fallacy at this point. Ukrainians now recognize that it’s time to cut their losses and negotiate a peace. Western armchair warriors need to recognize this too. Reading by Tim Foley:

Some Thoughts On Ukraine As the Trump administration pauses military aid to Ukraine and western liberals continue their shrieking meltdown over Trump hurting Saint Zelensky’s feelings, it’s probably worth reminding everyone that the Russian invasion of Ukraine was indisputably provoked by western aggressions. That’s why so many western experts and analysts spent years warning ahead of time that western aggressions were going to provoke an invasion of Ukraine. Now, some may hear this and say “Okay but Russia still shouldn’t have invaded even though our western leaders were aggressively provoking them to.” But before you do that it might be a good idea to look inside yourself and ask where that impulse is arising from. Why are you so eager to skip past the part where you criticize your own rulers for their role in starting this war and focus solely on criticizing the leader of an eastern government who has no power over you? What is it inside of you that’s flailing all over the place trying to avoid any forceful scrutiny of the reckless warmongering of your own government and its allies? The last time a foreign rival placed a credible military threat near the border of the United States, the US responded so aggressively that the world almost ended (if you want to know just how close we came to nuclear annihilation during the Cuban Missile Crisis, look up the name Vasili Arkhipov). Western liberals have been conditioned to insist that Russia should have responded differently to the US empire amassing proxy forces on its border than the US would respond to the same kind of threat on its own borders. The frenetic mental contortions needed to justify this ridiculous double standard are only possible because the west is saturated in domestic propaganda manipulating the way they think about the world. It makes sense for there to be criticism of Russia for its role in this war, and for people to be horrified by the nightmare that’s been happening in Ukraine these last few years. What makes absolutely no sense whatsoever is for western liberals (or “progressives” or whatever they want to call themselves) to assign ZERO PERCENT RESPONSIBILITY to their own government and its allies for their extensively documented role in sparking this conflict and ONE HUNDRED PERCENT RESPONSIBILITY to a foreign government with no power over them. That’s pathetic, bootlicking behavior, and it’s utterly inexcusable. Stop performing mental gymnastics to defend the abuses of your rulers. Have a little dignity for god’s sake. It is good that Trump appears to be moving toward ending an unwinnable proxy war that Ukrainians no longer want to fight. Anyone who disagrees with this is a dogshit human being. I am not grateful to Trump for ending this nightmare, I’m just disgusted with anyone who’s against doing so. The proxy war in Ukraine was going to end sometime relatively soon anyway; the only way for NATO to reverse Russia’s steady gains at this point would be to intervene more directly in ways that would risk nuclear consequences that western leaders aren’t willing to receive. This was always a chess game for them; they’re not going to put their own necks on the line. So the war had to end — the Trumpists are just the faction that the empire has tasked with advancing this agenda. I will not waste any gratitude on Trump rolling back a failed imperial bid to weaken Russia, but I will absolutely scream my fucking lungs out at anyone who insists Ukrainians should keep throwing their bodies into a war that Ukrainians themselves no longer support. If you want the Ukraine war to continue, then go enlist and put your body on the line so that Ukrainians don’t have to. The Ukrainian Foreign Legion is still accepting volunteers. If you want this horrific war to continue, either go and fight or shut the fuck up. Stop tweeting from the sofa in your safe, comfortable home and get your ass to the frontline. Bring along as many western liberals as you can convince to join your cause. The western empire provoked this war. The western empire sabotaged peace talks in the early weeks after the invasion. They refused off-ramp after off-ramp in pushing Ukraine into this situation, and as a result Ukraine is going to be much worse off than before this all started. Wanting Ukraine to keep throwing human lives into the meat grinder in the hopes that they can recover all their lost territory is just sunk cost fallacy at this point. Ukrainians now recognize that it’s time to cut their losses and negotiate a peace. Western armchair warriors need to recognize this too. Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

78,335 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Coffee thoughts - New relationships This caught my attention yesterday. Candace you say Erika and you were never friends? You never had a relationship. Interesting. Now it makes sense on why the attacks on her. (Video 1) She started traveling with you guys immediately after Charlie and her met. I bet that was hard. Now Charlie’s attention was all on Erika. You love to tell the stories about you and Charlie and how you were on the road. But once she came along it was all her and Charlie. Bet that sucked. Hawaii had to be horrible. Everything changed. Is that why you jumped on George so fast? George and Charlie were not friends either. Charlie firing him from TPUK stopped that. You never went out to dinner or hung out as couples. That’s why the only stories of you and Charlie you can tell now is before 2019. You’ve alluded to Erika and new people in Charlie’s life started having his ear when he started dating her. That he changed. You make it sound like those people are why you were let go and he started lying to you. (Video 4) You weren’t even invited to the wedding. Wonder how you took the not being invited. I bet you flipped. It does make me wonder who the gang was you thought would get back together after Charlie died. What old gang Candace? Erika and you never had a relationship. You had already attacked everyone at TPUsa, DW, the Trump family and most of the Conservative Party. Why in the world would you think they wanted you around? (Video 2) You unfollowed Charlie on social media and deleted all the pictures Candace they knew you were nuts. Thats stalkerish ex girlfriend vibes Candace. He had fired you again in May 2024 when you needed him most after losing your job at DW. Did you have hope before that he’d come back and you’d be a duo again? Not only did he fire you, he put Ben who you absolutely detest and think is trying to bankrupt you in your place at the events. Ouch. Besties don’t do that. This is all why the attacks on Erika and everyone that was part of that gang that grey rocked you isn’t it? The ones that had you sitting in a basement and not on the stage. They all worked together to take you down. The fact Erika took Charlie and is in that gang and now has the job you wanted is eating you alive. Vengeance is your vice. (Video 3). Go talk to your priest Candace.

Coffee thoughts - New relationships This caught my attention yesterday. Candace you say Erika and you were never friends? You never had a relationship. Interesting. Now it makes sense on why the attacks on her. (Video 1) She started traveling with you guys immediately after Charlie and her met. I bet that was hard. Now Charlie’s attention was all on Erika. You love to tell the stories about you and Charlie and how you were on the road. But once she came along it was all her and Charlie. Bet that sucked. Hawaii had to be horrible. Everything changed. Is that why you jumped on George so fast? George and Charlie were not friends either. Charlie firing him from TPUK stopped that. You never went out to dinner or hung out as couples. That’s why the only stories of you and Charlie you can tell now is before 2019. You’ve alluded to Erika and new people in Charlie’s life started having his ear when he started dating her. That he changed. You make it sound like those people are why you were let go and he started lying to you. (Video 4) You weren’t even invited to the wedding. Wonder how you took the not being invited. I bet you flipped. It does make me wonder who the gang was you thought would get back together after Charlie died. What old gang Candace? Erika and you never had a relationship. You had already attacked everyone at TPUsa, DW, the Trump family and most of the Conservative Party. Why in the world would you think they wanted you around? (Video 2) You unfollowed Charlie on social media and deleted all the pictures Candace they knew you were nuts. Thats stalkerish ex girlfriend vibes Candace. He had fired you again in May 2024 when you needed him most after losing your job at DW. Did you have hope before that he’d come back and you’d be a duo again? Not only did he fire you, he put Ben who you absolutely detest and think is trying to bankrupt you in your place at the events. Ouch. Besties don’t do that. This is all why the attacks on Erika and everyone that was part of that gang that grey rocked you isn’t it? The ones that had you sitting in a basement and not on the stage. They all worked together to take you down. The fact Erika took Charlie and is in that gang and now has the job you wanted is eating you alive. Vengeance is your vice. (Video 3). Go talk to your priest Candace.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

17,588 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

Tulsi Gabbard's “guru” Chris Butler demands total obedience from his devotees, according to former cult members. Jon Swaine reports: “Gabbard grew up in Butler’s breakaway Hare Krishna group. Her parents held senior positions in the organization... Some former members, however, have called the group a cult and said disciples were isolated from the outside world, characterizations the group has denied. Former devotees had been telling me for weeks that Butler controlled his followers’ major life decisions and demanded total obedience and secrecy. They said he spent years working to extend his reach into politics — and they suspected Gabbard’s rise in Washington was the culmination of that effort." Swaine's source, Rebecca Saltzburg, leaked to Swaine "Dozens of attached memos appeared to document directives and advice for Gabbard from her time in Congress. Some contained instructions on what legislation she should propose, which policies she should embrace and how she should conduct herself on television. They had an air of authority." The source said the author of the memos directing Gabbard was Chris Butler: "The main speaker in a 2014 memo pressed for her to propose legislation penalizing countries with citizens who had fought for the Islamic State, and to issue a statement about it. 'Get it started in the morning,' the person said. 'You need to be the leader in this regard. Don’t dick around.' I found that Gabbard released a statement the following day. A week after that, she introduced a bill in the House." Another instance in which Gabbard appears to have complied with Butler's specific direction: "One memo I noticed in particular was from 2014 and was labeled 'Call with T.' The unnamed speaker in that document argued that to avoid delays in medical treatment, veterans should be able to get care at any hospital and be reimbursed by Veterans Affairs, and they should be able to do so without first obtaining government approval. 'Actually put forward legislation. Get it done,' the speaker said. Three weeks later, Gabbard endorsed a version of that policy in an op-ed in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser. But she omitted any discussion of prior approval — a key idea that distinguished the unnamed adviser’s plan from remedies pushed by other Democrats. Soon after the op-ed was published, Hoen emailed Saltzburg. ‘He was pissed she didn’t say that they should get private care withOUT pre-approval,’ Hoen wrote. She did not say who ‘he’ was. Saltzburg told me she understood it to be Butler. A month later, Gabbard introduced a bill that made explicit that veterans would not need preapproval for private care." Gabbard seems to obey Butler's every order, which aligns with the complete obedience demanded in his cult, as described by former members.

Tulsi Gabbard's “guru” Chris Butler demands total obedience from his devotees, according to former cult members. Jon Swaine reports: “Gabbard grew up in Butler’s breakaway Hare Krishna group. Her parents held senior positions in the organization... Some former members, however, have called the group a cult and said disciples were isolated from the outside world, characterizations the group has denied. Former devotees had been telling me for weeks that Butler controlled his followers’ major life decisions and demanded total obedience and secrecy. They said he spent years working to extend his reach into politics — and they suspected Gabbard’s rise in Washington was the culmination of that effort." Swaine's source, Rebecca Saltzburg, leaked to Swaine "Dozens of attached memos appeared to document directives and advice for Gabbard from her time in Congress. Some contained instructions on what legislation she should propose, which policies she should embrace and how she should conduct herself on television. They had an air of authority." The source said the author of the memos directing Gabbard was Chris Butler: "The main speaker in a 2014 memo pressed for her to propose legislation penalizing countries with citizens who had fought for the Islamic State, and to issue a statement about it. 'Get it started in the morning,' the person said. 'You need to be the leader in this regard. Don’t dick around.' I found that Gabbard released a statement the following day. A week after that, she introduced a bill in the House." Another instance in which Gabbard appears to have complied with Butler's specific direction: "One memo I noticed in particular was from 2014 and was labeled 'Call with T.' The unnamed speaker in that document argued that to avoid delays in medical treatment, veterans should be able to get care at any hospital and be reimbursed by Veterans Affairs, and they should be able to do so without first obtaining government approval. 'Actually put forward legislation. Get it done,' the speaker said. Three weeks later, Gabbard endorsed a version of that policy in an op-ed in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser. But she omitted any discussion of prior approval — a key idea that distinguished the unnamed adviser’s plan from remedies pushed by other Democrats. Soon after the op-ed was published, Hoen emailed Saltzburg. ‘He was pissed she didn’t say that they should get private care withOUT pre-approval,’ Hoen wrote. She did not say who ‘he’ was. Saltzburg told me she understood it to be Butler. A month later, Gabbard introduced a bill that made explicit that veterans would not need preapproval for private care." Gabbard seems to obey Butler's every order, which aligns with the complete obedience demanded in his cult, as described by former members.

Liz Wheeler

26,911 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

🔥 $PLTR Co-founder Joe Lonsdale with Tom Bilyeu on Why Meritocracy and Intelligence Matters "At Palantir, we started off with a bunch of these math champions and chess champions, just the best people out of the Ph.D. programs at Stanford, MIT, and other places. They brought their smartest friends, who brought their smartest friends, and that’s just a huge advantage. In the tech world, with the very, very top companies, you don’t see just average people there. You see extraordinarily bright minds, and that three, four, or fifth standard deviation of skill is the same way. By the way, if you want to have the Oakland A’s be a top baseball team or a top basketball team, you can’t just have an average guy on the team. You need the very, very best—the top merit in that area. In some cases, it’s a skill, like in sports. In other areas, it’s IQ, and IQ matters a lot for what we’re doing." The American government was really competent in the mid-20th century. Is it something that no one else could do? You know, we fought two world wars. We went to the Moon. It turns out that we used to have really hard tests to run things in the U.S. government. So, allow me to go back a little bit to the 19th century. The government grew a lot after the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln created a lot of new departments, and the central government all of a sudden became a much bigger thing in the 1860s and 70s. By the time of 1883, it was a mess. Everyone agreed, this is a mess because whoever wins the presidency just brings in all their friends, all their cronies, their stupid cousin Vinnie, whoever else. They’re all getting paid a ton of money just to hang out in D.C. and not get anything done. So, they said, “Guys, we need to have tests. We need to have merit. We need to actually say the people running things need to be really smart.” So, we put in these tests with the Pendleton Act of 1883, and these tests were there all the way through the Moon landing, through everything. Then, come the late 1970s, our country became very politicized around affirmative action. It turns out these tests had different results on average for different races. They weren’t racist tests, by the way. I would agree that the tests actually measured your performance. But despite that, the activist courts on the left said, “No more tests.” So, around 1980 or so, they threw out the tests. And, by the way, they didn’t just throw out the tests. They made it almost impossible to fire people. They put in massive protections where it’s really hard and slow to fire people. So, starting in 1980, our government is not able to do tests anymore, not able to do merit. It just starts getting dumber slowly over time—dumber and dumber. So, for 45 years, our government’s been getting dumber. That is interesting. Tom Bilyeu: One of the great revelations of my adult life—and this actually bothers me—is the degree to which intelligence matters. What role do you think intelligence plays, full stop? Whether you’re trying to improve the government, whether you’re trying to be the baddest kid on the international block, or you’re trying to build a company? Joe Lonsdale: This is a really important point because, obviously, intelligence isn’t everything. I think integrity, faith, why you care about the world, and your motives matter to help people. But if you actually want to be effective at whatever those motives are, intelligence is absolutely central. Merit is absolutely central. If you look at the very top companies versus an average company, you have the best and the brightest.

🔥 $PLTR Co-founder Joe Lonsdale with Tom Bilyeu on Why Meritocracy and Intelligence Matters "At Palantir, we started off with a bunch of these math champions and chess champions, just the best people out of the Ph.D. programs at Stanford, MIT, and other places. They brought their smartest friends, who brought their smartest friends, and that’s just a huge advantage. In the tech world, with the very, very top companies, you don’t see just average people there. You see extraordinarily bright minds, and that three, four, or fifth standard deviation of skill is the same way. By the way, if you want to have the Oakland A’s be a top baseball team or a top basketball team, you can’t just have an average guy on the team. You need the very, very best—the top merit in that area. In some cases, it’s a skill, like in sports. In other areas, it’s IQ, and IQ matters a lot for what we’re doing." The American government was really competent in the mid-20th century. Is it something that no one else could do? You know, we fought two world wars. We went to the Moon. It turns out that we used to have really hard tests to run things in the U.S. government. So, allow me to go back a little bit to the 19th century. The government grew a lot after the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln created a lot of new departments, and the central government all of a sudden became a much bigger thing in the 1860s and 70s. By the time of 1883, it was a mess. Everyone agreed, this is a mess because whoever wins the presidency just brings in all their friends, all their cronies, their stupid cousin Vinnie, whoever else. They’re all getting paid a ton of money just to hang out in D.C. and not get anything done. So, they said, “Guys, we need to have tests. We need to have merit. We need to actually say the people running things need to be really smart.” So, we put in these tests with the Pendleton Act of 1883, and these tests were there all the way through the Moon landing, through everything. Then, come the late 1970s, our country became very politicized around affirmative action. It turns out these tests had different results on average for different races. They weren’t racist tests, by the way. I would agree that the tests actually measured your performance. But despite that, the activist courts on the left said, “No more tests.” So, around 1980 or so, they threw out the tests. And, by the way, they didn’t just throw out the tests. They made it almost impossible to fire people. They put in massive protections where it’s really hard and slow to fire people. So, starting in 1980, our government is not able to do tests anymore, not able to do merit. It just starts getting dumber slowly over time—dumber and dumber. So, for 45 years, our government’s been getting dumber. That is interesting. Tom Bilyeu: One of the great revelations of my adult life—and this actually bothers me—is the degree to which intelligence matters. What role do you think intelligence plays, full stop? Whether you’re trying to improve the government, whether you’re trying to be the baddest kid on the international block, or you’re trying to build a company? Joe Lonsdale: This is a really important point because, obviously, intelligence isn’t everything. I think integrity, faith, why you care about the world, and your motives matter to help people. But if you actually want to be effective at whatever those motives are, intelligence is absolutely central. Merit is absolutely central. If you look at the very top companies versus an average company, you have the best and the brightest.

Trade Whisperer

40,026 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

First Impression About Neverness To Everness CBT This will be a long or short one and I mostly have plenty of good to say about the game so far and some bad. First I want to get out the way: Graphics In short, we already know its good! But this is definitely playing some part on performance on my end and it wasn't entirely bad experience at all just some fps drops here and there but its playable and 90% of time it was smooth so the performance issues is a easy fix (apart from some I've seen have already started having crash issues so it'll be different for all of us depending on your specs) I'm well in range of the specs so if I'm having some small issues that mean whoever has worse specs will have it worse. Performance/Optimizing the game etc is not something that should be ignored anyway and most of the time developers of recent time feel like they don't care about improving it, I hope NTE by release or during the test will fix the issues by then (crash problems etc + its day one of the test anyway) Second: Combat Just like wuthering waves, the games combat is fun (I still think it can benefit more on having more effects/impact frames etc to really nail the combat experience...) I know people have compared some characters to WuWa characters as "plagirism" but most part alot of characters in the game have their own charm and uniqueness to the combat The boss enemies also may have some unpredictable patterns and can put alot of pressure or aggression on you but isn't exactly too hard thankfully! But its still great because I like how fast pace and intense the fightings are when your in the boss fights Common enemies don't have much going on for them. Third: Story Unlike Genshin and Wuthering Waves the story for NTE or Neverness to Everness is actually more "Human" one of my viewers described it as and I actually agree, I'm not saying WuWa nor Genshin storytelling is bad but the way NTE tells its story is more morden and you can easily be engaged with it and understand everything clearly! The story is also pretty goofy and just like zenless they have great animations and (VERY) expressive with their animations which makes for great overall experience and I prefer this storytelling the most out of other games. (this is a personal preference) The gacha system is some sort of board game but the game gacha is F2P friendly?(For now for what I've seen) and there's no 50/50.. I was also almost able to max out alot of characters that aren't S rank in almost a day too Thats all so far, I'm still experiencing more as I go but this sums up my 5 hours so far into the game on stream and would love to see y'all in the next stream tomorrow. After I reach 50 hours or more I will do a video in conclusion about the game and what more I would love to see. TDLR: The game is good/great don't worry, just some small stuff that can make it better or some stuff that need fixing (despite the combat plagirism drama that was going on)

First Impression About Neverness To Everness CBT This will be a long or short one and I mostly have plenty of good to say about the game so far and some bad. First I want to get out the way: Graphics In short, we already know its good! But this is definitely playing some part on performance on my end and it wasn't entirely bad experience at all just some fps drops here and there but its playable and 90% of time it was smooth so the performance issues is a easy fix (apart from some I've seen have already started having crash issues so it'll be different for all of us depending on your specs) I'm well in range of the specs so if I'm having some small issues that mean whoever has worse specs will have it worse. Performance/Optimizing the game etc is not something that should be ignored anyway and most of the time developers of recent time feel like they don't care about improving it, I hope NTE by release or during the test will fix the issues by then (crash problems etc + its day one of the test anyway) Second: Combat Just like wuthering waves, the games combat is fun (I still think it can benefit more on having more effects/impact frames etc to really nail the combat experience...) I know people have compared some characters to WuWa characters as "plagirism" but most part alot of characters in the game have their own charm and uniqueness to the combat The boss enemies also may have some unpredictable patterns and can put alot of pressure or aggression on you but isn't exactly too hard thankfully! But its still great because I like how fast pace and intense the fightings are when your in the boss fights Common enemies don't have much going on for them. Third: Story Unlike Genshin and Wuthering Waves the story for NTE or Neverness to Everness is actually more "Human" one of my viewers described it as and I actually agree, I'm not saying WuWa nor Genshin storytelling is bad but the way NTE tells its story is more morden and you can easily be engaged with it and understand everything clearly! The story is also pretty goofy and just like zenless they have great animations and (VERY) expressive with their animations which makes for great overall experience and I prefer this storytelling the most out of other games. (this is a personal preference) The gacha system is some sort of board game but the game gacha is F2P friendly?(For now for what I've seen) and there's no 50/50.. I was also almost able to max out alot of characters that aren't S rank in almost a day too Thats all so far, I'm still experiencing more as I go but this sums up my 5 hours so far into the game on stream and would love to see y'all in the next stream tomorrow. After I reach 50 hours or more I will do a video in conclusion about the game and what more I would love to see. TDLR: The game is good/great don't worry, just some small stuff that can make it better or some stuff that need fixing (despite the combat plagirism drama that was going on)

Aruzien

55,067 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Q. Among SEVENTEEN's choreography, which one is the hardest, or which one is the most intense? 🕺🏻: This might seem like an obvious answer, but anyone who knows SEVENTEEN's choreography already know this. There's no easy SEVENTEEN choreography. All of them are hard 👤: Why is it like that though? 🕺🏻: Because they're so talented and they understand and make music as well. For example, if you hear a 'tuk' sound, you have to throw a movement with a 'tuk' feeling, and if you hear a 'kung', you have to hit with a 'kung' feeling. The scale of these movements are different, you know? The scale of the movement? I always tell choreographers that they need to choreography that matches the scale and intensity of the beat That's what allows people to be immersed in it, and that's what makes good choreography. But usually, because [idols] have to sing live and things like that, there are many choreographies that get made smaller or lighter compared to the intensity of the song's beat. But SEVENTEEN isn't like that. They fully put in choreography that matches the full impact, the '땜삥' (feel) of the music exactly as it's heard. 👤: So they stayed true without compromising 🕺🏻: Because they're able to pull all of it off. That's why when you watch SEVENTEEN's choreography, it feels completely full. The formations are packed full too, and they throw in the right levels of power to match the beats, and the sense of speed? all those things are filled to the maximum (perfectly in place). That's why people find SEVENTEEN's choreography is fun to watch. But since they're able to pull it all off, I'm able to put all of it into the choreography. This is truly SEVENTEEN's capability. 👤: I totally get what you mean. Since they have to perform live, it usually comes with compromise, you scale down certain parts to match that. But with SEVENTEEN, they're able to do all without compromises. 🕺🏻: They'd say "Hyung, well do it all", "Just make us do it all". Funny thing is, [there's this story] on one of the album. They have been active for quite long, I thought they might get tired so I removed jumps and things like that from the choreography. 👤: Oh that sounds considerate to me? 🕺🏻: But when I took them out, they go "hmm", "hmm.. is this really okay?". At first they were like "Ah hyung, please take out some of the jumps", but when I actually removed them, they said "Ah hyung, it doesn't hit the same anymore", "It doesn't have the same stage vibe". So we ended up putting everything back in. That's when I realize how they truly feel the joy of performing on stage, the joy of being artist. And when that happens, what comes next? They gain confidence, right? And when fans look at artists brimming with confidence, how do the fans react? They go wild, right. And when the company sees the fans like that, what happens? Woah~ they will be thrilled. That's how the overall final result ends up being created. #SEVENTEEN #세븐틴

Q. Among SEVENTEEN's choreography, which one is the hardest, or which one is the most intense? 🕺🏻: This might seem like an obvious answer, but anyone who knows SEVENTEEN's choreography already know this. There's no easy SEVENTEEN choreography. All of them are hard 👤: Why is it like that though? 🕺🏻: Because they're so talented and they understand and make music as well. For example, if you hear a 'tuk' sound, you have to throw a movement with a 'tuk' feeling, and if you hear a 'kung', you have to hit with a 'kung' feeling. The scale of these movements are different, you know? The scale of the movement? I always tell choreographers that they need to choreography that matches the scale and intensity of the beat That's what allows people to be immersed in it, and that's what makes good choreography. But usually, because [idols] have to sing live and things like that, there are many choreographies that get made smaller or lighter compared to the intensity of the song's beat. But SEVENTEEN isn't like that. They fully put in choreography that matches the full impact, the '땜삥' (feel) of the music exactly as it's heard. 👤: So they stayed true without compromising 🕺🏻: Because they're able to pull all of it off. That's why when you watch SEVENTEEN's choreography, it feels completely full. The formations are packed full too, and they throw in the right levels of power to match the beats, and the sense of speed? all those things are filled to the maximum (perfectly in place). That's why people find SEVENTEEN's choreography is fun to watch. But since they're able to pull it all off, I'm able to put all of it into the choreography. This is truly SEVENTEEN's capability. 👤: I totally get what you mean. Since they have to perform live, it usually comes with compromise, you scale down certain parts to match that. But with SEVENTEEN, they're able to do all without compromises. 🕺🏻: They'd say "Hyung, well do it all", "Just make us do it all". Funny thing is, [there's this story] on one of the album. They have been active for quite long, I thought they might get tired so I removed jumps and things like that from the choreography. 👤: Oh that sounds considerate to me? 🕺🏻: But when I took them out, they go "hmm", "hmm.. is this really okay?". At first they were like "Ah hyung, please take out some of the jumps", but when I actually removed them, they said "Ah hyung, it doesn't hit the same anymore", "It doesn't have the same stage vibe". So we ended up putting everything back in. That's when I realize how they truly feel the joy of performing on stage, the joy of being artist. And when that happens, what comes next? They gain confidence, right? And when fans look at artists brimming with confidence, how do the fans react? They go wild, right. And when the company sees the fans like that, what happens? Woah~ they will be thrilled. That's how the overall final result ends up being created. #SEVENTEEN #세븐틴

svt contents

51,207 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, says that passengers on the Titanic actually didn’t want to leave the ship for almost two hours after it hit the iceberg. Pavel Durov says we are in a similar situation: our ship has already hit the iceberg. We have already started to sink without even realizing it. He is talking about the ship of our personal freedoms. He says that personal freedoms have been eroded almost everywhere in the world, with very few exceptions. He has witnessed firsthand the methods governments use to suppress our freedoms and take away our basic rights. He has seen all the tricks: the PR tricks, the legal tricks, the political tricks, the manipulations, and the official excuses. The thing that bothers him most today is that some of the same tricks employed by authoritarian regimes in places like Russia, China, and Iran are now also being used in some Western countries. ————— Here are some key statements from Pavel Durov: “Thousands of people are getting arrested every year in the United Kingdom for social media posts.” “You say something politically incorrect online, you may end up being fined or spend some time in prison. In Germany, people get arrested and persecuted for insulting politicians online, thousands of people every year.” “You call a politician a bigot or a thief online and you can serve up to 3 years in prison. So, now people are afraid to use their real identities. People stop using their real names when they make comments online.” “The criminals will be fine. It will be the law-abiding citizens who will be put in danger.” “Last year, a French tax official was caught stealing the financial data of people who held large amount of crypto assets… you have a catastrophic rise in the number of kidnappings in France. Just in the first 3 months of 2026, you have over 40 victims of kidnappings in France.” “Another trick that has been used by authoritarians for decades. And now it is being increasingly exported from the East to the West. I’m talking about selective enforcement of laws. The way it works is pretty straightforward. First, you need to introduce a large number of laws. You need to overburden a certain industry with excessive, mutually exclusive, contradictory regulation. As a result, you make compliance impossible. Now you can treat every entrepreneur, every CEO, every business owner in this country as a criminal. But then the government carefully starts to choose who to persecute. If the business owner is loyal, if it complies with immoral, unlawful demands from the government, gives certain political favors, then the law enforcement system and the judicial system look the other way. But if the business owner decides to stand up for the constitutional rights of his or her fellow citizens, if they refuse to cave in to political demands from the authoritarian government, then the persecution comes in full.” “We cannot afford to have this ship sunk. There is nowhere to escape. In the past, dissidents from authoritarian countries could flee to the West. But if the current trajectory continues, in a decade or two from now, they will have hard time trying to understand whether they have already left their repressive homeland or they’re just entering another open-air prison.” “Those who are willing to give up their essential liberty for some temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ————— Which would you choose: essential liberty or temporary safety?

Pavel Durov, founder of Telegram, says that passengers on the Titanic actually didn’t want to leave the ship for almost two hours after it hit the iceberg. Pavel Durov says we are in a similar situation: our ship has already hit the iceberg. We have already started to sink without even realizing it. He is talking about the ship of our personal freedoms. He says that personal freedoms have been eroded almost everywhere in the world, with very few exceptions. He has witnessed firsthand the methods governments use to suppress our freedoms and take away our basic rights. He has seen all the tricks: the PR tricks, the legal tricks, the political tricks, the manipulations, and the official excuses. The thing that bothers him most today is that some of the same tricks employed by authoritarian regimes in places like Russia, China, and Iran are now also being used in some Western countries. ————— Here are some key statements from Pavel Durov: “Thousands of people are getting arrested every year in the United Kingdom for social media posts.” “You say something politically incorrect online, you may end up being fined or spend some time in prison. In Germany, people get arrested and persecuted for insulting politicians online, thousands of people every year.” “You call a politician a bigot or a thief online and you can serve up to 3 years in prison. So, now people are afraid to use their real identities. People stop using their real names when they make comments online.” “The criminals will be fine. It will be the law-abiding citizens who will be put in danger.” “Last year, a French tax official was caught stealing the financial data of people who held large amount of crypto assets… you have a catastrophic rise in the number of kidnappings in France. Just in the first 3 months of 2026, you have over 40 victims of kidnappings in France.” “Another trick that has been used by authoritarians for decades. And now it is being increasingly exported from the East to the West. I’m talking about selective enforcement of laws. The way it works is pretty straightforward. First, you need to introduce a large number of laws. You need to overburden a certain industry with excessive, mutually exclusive, contradictory regulation. As a result, you make compliance impossible. Now you can treat every entrepreneur, every CEO, every business owner in this country as a criminal. But then the government carefully starts to choose who to persecute. If the business owner is loyal, if it complies with immoral, unlawful demands from the government, gives certain political favors, then the law enforcement system and the judicial system look the other way. But if the business owner decides to stand up for the constitutional rights of his or her fellow citizens, if they refuse to cave in to political demands from the authoritarian government, then the persecution comes in full.” “We cannot afford to have this ship sunk. There is nowhere to escape. In the past, dissidents from authoritarian countries could flee to the West. But if the current trajectory continues, in a decade or two from now, they will have hard time trying to understand whether they have already left their repressive homeland or they’re just entering another open-air prison.” “Those who are willing to give up their essential liberty for some temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ————— Which would you choose: essential liberty or temporary safety?

Kekius Maximus

355,337 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

🔥👽 New Knapp: Bigelow Met with Lockheed VP, James Ryder. Lockheed Wanted Something in Return for Their Alleged NHI Materials/Craft. 🔥👽 What did Lockheed want and from Bigelow? Anybody have any guesses? Knapp: Former Senate staffer, Dick D'Amato, couldn't find the Legacy UAP Crash Retrieval and Reverse Engineering Program. Same goes for Congress. But Congress has, "got to figure out a way to give an incentive to the companies who've been holding this stuff, to go ahead and cough it up, or at least acknowledge they've got it. I think that they would like the help. I anticipate that they would appreciate some assistance in figuring this out. "That's what I testified to, with permission from people I'm close to, is that there was an effort during the AAWSAP program - that was based here in Las Vegas, the DIA investigation - to change hands with some of that material. That Lockheed agreed to hand it over. There's another side to that agreement - with the BAASS and AAWSAP people - there's another side to that deal that has not been made public, that I can't share. But, there was something in it for both of them, and I think we got to figure out a way to have something in it for both sides if we're gonna expect these big conglomerates to go ahead..." (Again, what the heck did Lockheed want and need from Bigelow that they couldn't get elsewhere? Something to do with Bigelow work on inflatable space habitats?) Captain Ron: "To turn it over. Of course. And that's fair. George, during this hearing, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna asked all of you for a name that you guys could give her, and you spit out Glenn Gaffney, who was the former Director of Science and Technology at the CIA. What do you think he can provide to Congress?" Knapp: "What I was told is, he was a direct contact and overseer with a couple of these aerospace companies about the goodies (alleged NHI craft and bodies). Where it went, what they were doing with it. He was the point of contact for CIA, science and technology, on who did what with that material. And the reason it came up was, during that AAWSAP program - the DIA program based here in Las Vegas - Robert Bigelow went to Lockheed and tried to negotiate a transfer of materials. He had spent a million dollars of his own money at Bigelow Aerospace to prepare his plant in the event that it started to receive that kind of material, and to meet certain security standards that was required by the government. "[Bigelow] talked to him. He talked face-to-face with this guy, James Ryder, a vice president of Lockheed - longtime guy, highly respected- who had offered to transfer certain materials that were hidden at a plant in Southern California (Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell has mentioned an address in Burbank where Lockheed USED to have a plant/facility), give them to BAASS, to Bigelow, in exchange for something else that I can't get into. But...A, he's admitting they've got it. B, he admits that they don't exactly know what it is or how it was made." (Sounds like what Admiral Wilson was told by the self-described Gatekeepers/Watch Committee in 1997) Knapp: "More importantly, it appeared that, for example, it had been made in zero gravity. Whoever made this stuff did it in a place...we don't have any labs or factories in outer space in zero gravity but, whoever made it, did. So, you know, that confirmed to me that they do have it, they're trying to figure it out, and they were willing to exchange some of it for something else that Lockheed needed. "What I was told was that this Glenn Gaffney guy hit the roof when he found out that Lockheed still had this stuff and that it was willing to change hands, he stopped it, dead, cold. And then the guy that he was negotiating with, this vice president at Lockheed, died, and that was the end of that. So I thought..." (AAWSAP officially ended in 2010 but they still tried to find more funding and a new home in the years after. And then we had the attempt to create a USAP known as Kona Blue, up until 2012 or so. Ryder died in 2018 so I'm not sure if efforts to transfer those materials or alleged craft to Bigelow continued up until 2018.) Ron: "Do you think if it went Bigelow, it would just get lost in there, just like it is in Lockheed, because that's a private company as well?" Knapp: "Bigelow is a guy who demands results. He's not a patient man. You know, they were able to put AAWSAP together in an incredibly short period of time. They had 50 full time investigators up and running - they got their security clearances - and they got to work like that. If they'd been allowed to continue beyond 27 months, we might have a lot of answers. Because, they created the world's largest UFO database, 240,000 cases, from all over the world. And if they [were] allowed to continue, Jacques Vallée was going to put an AI component over it and be able to connect the dots in all this data. "They produced more than 100 highly-detailed, highly-technical papers, not one of which has ever been released. So, Bigelow is a tough guy to work for. He cracks the whip. And I think if he'd gotten that material from Lockheed, we'd have some results by now. We'd have some answers." (If Bigelow had received the craft and AAWSAP or Kona Blue had continued, it's possible we would have never heard about AAWSAP or any of that. Bigelow should have all of the AAWSAP papers and reports and he has yet to release any of them. Why? That database, along with the advanced AI that we have access to, might be able to help us figure out what's going on with phenomenon.)

🔥👽 New Knapp: Bigelow Met with Lockheed VP, James Ryder. Lockheed Wanted Something in Return for Their Alleged NHI Materials/Craft. 🔥👽 What did Lockheed want and from Bigelow? Anybody have any guesses? Knapp: Former Senate staffer, Dick D'Amato, couldn't find the Legacy UAP Crash Retrieval and Reverse Engineering Program. Same goes for Congress. But Congress has, "got to figure out a way to give an incentive to the companies who've been holding this stuff, to go ahead and cough it up, or at least acknowledge they've got it. I think that they would like the help. I anticipate that they would appreciate some assistance in figuring this out. "That's what I testified to, with permission from people I'm close to, is that there was an effort during the AAWSAP program - that was based here in Las Vegas, the DIA investigation - to change hands with some of that material. That Lockheed agreed to hand it over. There's another side to that agreement - with the BAASS and AAWSAP people - there's another side to that deal that has not been made public, that I can't share. But, there was something in it for both of them, and I think we got to figure out a way to have something in it for both sides if we're gonna expect these big conglomerates to go ahead..." (Again, what the heck did Lockheed want and need from Bigelow that they couldn't get elsewhere? Something to do with Bigelow work on inflatable space habitats?) Captain Ron: "To turn it over. Of course. And that's fair. George, during this hearing, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna asked all of you for a name that you guys could give her, and you spit out Glenn Gaffney, who was the former Director of Science and Technology at the CIA. What do you think he can provide to Congress?" Knapp: "What I was told is, he was a direct contact and overseer with a couple of these aerospace companies about the goodies (alleged NHI craft and bodies). Where it went, what they were doing with it. He was the point of contact for CIA, science and technology, on who did what with that material. And the reason it came up was, during that AAWSAP program - the DIA program based here in Las Vegas - Robert Bigelow went to Lockheed and tried to negotiate a transfer of materials. He had spent a million dollars of his own money at Bigelow Aerospace to prepare his plant in the event that it started to receive that kind of material, and to meet certain security standards that was required by the government. "[Bigelow] talked to him. He talked face-to-face with this guy, James Ryder, a vice president of Lockheed - longtime guy, highly respected- who had offered to transfer certain materials that were hidden at a plant in Southern California (Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell has mentioned an address in Burbank where Lockheed USED to have a plant/facility), give them to BAASS, to Bigelow, in exchange for something else that I can't get into. But...A, he's admitting they've got it. B, he admits that they don't exactly know what it is or how it was made." (Sounds like what Admiral Wilson was told by the self-described Gatekeepers/Watch Committee in 1997) Knapp: "More importantly, it appeared that, for example, it had been made in zero gravity. Whoever made this stuff did it in a place...we don't have any labs or factories in outer space in zero gravity but, whoever made it, did. So, you know, that confirmed to me that they do have it, they're trying to figure it out, and they were willing to exchange some of it for something else that Lockheed needed. "What I was told was that this Glenn Gaffney guy hit the roof when he found out that Lockheed still had this stuff and that it was willing to change hands, he stopped it, dead, cold. And then the guy that he was negotiating with, this vice president at Lockheed, died, and that was the end of that. So I thought..." (AAWSAP officially ended in 2010 but they still tried to find more funding and a new home in the years after. And then we had the attempt to create a USAP known as Kona Blue, up until 2012 or so. Ryder died in 2018 so I'm not sure if efforts to transfer those materials or alleged craft to Bigelow continued up until 2018.) Ron: "Do you think if it went Bigelow, it would just get lost in there, just like it is in Lockheed, because that's a private company as well?" Knapp: "Bigelow is a guy who demands results. He's not a patient man. You know, they were able to put AAWSAP together in an incredibly short period of time. They had 50 full time investigators up and running - they got their security clearances - and they got to work like that. If they'd been allowed to continue beyond 27 months, we might have a lot of answers. Because, they created the world's largest UFO database, 240,000 cases, from all over the world. And if they [were] allowed to continue, Jacques Vallée was going to put an AI component over it and be able to connect the dots in all this data. "They produced more than 100 highly-detailed, highly-technical papers, not one of which has ever been released. So, Bigelow is a tough guy to work for. He cracks the whip. And I think if he'd gotten that material from Lockheed, we'd have some results by now. We'd have some answers." (If Bigelow had received the craft and AAWSAP or Kona Blue had continued, it's possible we would have never heard about AAWSAP or any of that. Bigelow should have all of the AAWSAP papers and reports and he has yet to release any of them. Why? That database, along with the advanced AI that we have access to, might be able to help us figure out what's going on with phenomenon.)

Joe Murgia

16,327 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Patrick Swayze on how Marshall R. Teague & he nearly ki!!ed each other while filming this fight scene in "Road House" (1989): "'Road House' (1989) gave me the opportunity to hone an old skill [Martial Arts] that I never realized I’d missed. I soon found out that I’d need all the fighting skills I could muster for this movie. Because the actor who played my primary opponent, Marshall Teague, was ready to kick my ass for real if he could get away with it. From the very beginning, Marshall R. Teague, who played the bad-guy enforcer Jimmy, treated me like some snot-nose know-nothing actor. He had served in Vietnam and was a Navy SEAL—which meant he was a serious, real-life badass. He had no patience for bullsh!t and would say so to anyone’s face. Marshall apparently thought I was a dilettante pretty boy he could knock over with one of his meaty fingers. But when we started training, he learned otherwise. He and I started rehearsing our fight scenes, and soon enough he saw that I knew what I was doing, and that I could take a punch. “Let’s put some contact into it,” I told him, well aware that he could lay me flat out if he chose to. But I knew if we choreographed it well, we could have some contact without killing each other, and it would look amazingly real onscreen. When you earn the respect of a man like Marshall, you earn it for life. He and I became friends on the set of Road House, and we’ve been friends ever since. Not that many people understood his mentality, but when I looked him in the eye, we really connected. It was a good thing, too, because the fight scene we shot was absolutely epic, and we very nearly killed each other. We fought in a river, and I was wearing nothing but little hip-hugger sweatpants—no shirt, no pads, no nothing. So when I hit the ground, I was hitting the ground hard. Since both Marshall and I loved the adrenaline high of a fight, it was easy to get carried away, and we really started pounding on each other in this scene. After a few minutes of us punching and kicking the shit out of each other, Marshall picked up a log and swung it over his head. My eyes got wide as I realized he was about to break it right over my back. Marshall apparently thought it was a prop log, which would have been perfect for the scene—but unfortunately, it wasn’t. He realized his mistake midswing, but it was too late: He cracked me right across the spine with a real log, breaking a couple of my ribs and knocking the wind out of me. I dropped to my hands and knees, gasping for breath, but the scene called for us to keep fighting. I didn’t break character and didn’t give up —we kept fighting, and eventually got to the part where Dalton is forced to ki!! Jimmy. When you watch this scene in the movie, the exhaustion you see on my face is absolutely real. I barely had the strength to drag myself out of the river after that fight." ("The Time of My Life", Patrick Swayze and Lisa Niemi, 2009) P.S: On this day, 37 years ago, "Road House" (1989) was released in the USA & Canada.

Patrick Swayze on how Marshall R. Teague & he nearly ki!!ed each other while filming this fight scene in "Road House" (1989): "'Road House' (1989) gave me the opportunity to hone an old skill [Martial Arts] that I never realized I’d missed. I soon found out that I’d need all the fighting skills I could muster for this movie. Because the actor who played my primary opponent, Marshall Teague, was ready to kick my ass for real if he could get away with it. From the very beginning, Marshall R. Teague, who played the bad-guy enforcer Jimmy, treated me like some snot-nose know-nothing actor. He had served in Vietnam and was a Navy SEAL—which meant he was a serious, real-life badass. He had no patience for bullsh!t and would say so to anyone’s face. Marshall apparently thought I was a dilettante pretty boy he could knock over with one of his meaty fingers. But when we started training, he learned otherwise. He and I started rehearsing our fight scenes, and soon enough he saw that I knew what I was doing, and that I could take a punch. “Let’s put some contact into it,” I told him, well aware that he could lay me flat out if he chose to. But I knew if we choreographed it well, we could have some contact without killing each other, and it would look amazingly real onscreen. When you earn the respect of a man like Marshall, you earn it for life. He and I became friends on the set of Road House, and we’ve been friends ever since. Not that many people understood his mentality, but when I looked him in the eye, we really connected. It was a good thing, too, because the fight scene we shot was absolutely epic, and we very nearly killed each other. We fought in a river, and I was wearing nothing but little hip-hugger sweatpants—no shirt, no pads, no nothing. So when I hit the ground, I was hitting the ground hard. Since both Marshall and I loved the adrenaline high of a fight, it was easy to get carried away, and we really started pounding on each other in this scene. After a few minutes of us punching and kicking the shit out of each other, Marshall picked up a log and swung it over his head. My eyes got wide as I realized he was about to break it right over my back. Marshall apparently thought it was a prop log, which would have been perfect for the scene—but unfortunately, it wasn’t. He realized his mistake midswing, but it was too late: He cracked me right across the spine with a real log, breaking a couple of my ribs and knocking the wind out of me. I dropped to my hands and knees, gasping for breath, but the scene called for us to keep fighting. I didn’t break character and didn’t give up —we kept fighting, and eventually got to the part where Dalton is forced to ki!! Jimmy. When you watch this scene in the movie, the exhaustion you see on my face is absolutely real. I barely had the strength to drag myself out of the river after that fight." ("The Time of My Life", Patrick Swayze and Lisa Niemi, 2009) P.S: On this day, 37 years ago, "Road House" (1989) was released in the USA & Canada.

DepressedBergman

301,892 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"I'm not sure that we need the dog whistle at this point. And maybe there are ways to re-create it." ~Nolan "There might be a day when Skywatcher doesn't need to exist." ~Nolan "If I had been running the whole show, nobody would even know what Skywatcher is right now." ~Nolan ~My comments in ( )~ Garry P. Nolan: "We've got a lot of data from multiple alleged sightings, both radar and other kinds of data. First it was about getting the raw-data files all put in one place because some of the data was collected by James (Fowler) before there was, officially, kind of a Skywatcher. "And so, getting that data, getting the instrument names that he used for those, then getting the technical manuals of what the settings might be and how much of that information is collected in the metadata when you're collecting the thing... All of this is just the organization that you need to do before you do anything else. "And then, getting from the companies how it is that they parse their raw data. Because some of these data files are put into...I wouldn't call them encrypted, but they're stacked into a certain kind of file structure - and I've seen the file structure - which is, you can think of it as a giant spreadsheet with headings and numbers for each of the columns and time on the row axis. "And so, you know, we've started looking at some of the data and put it into, let's say, 3D tracking. And it's clear that there are some things about the data that we needed to go back to the vendor who makes the instrument and say, 'Why is this and this and this happening, you know, every few dozen milliseconds?'" (I wonder if some of what they saw in their data, and labelled as anomalous, has maybe turned out to be a sensor artifact?) Nolan: "And so, you know, just getting an answer from these companies, often, when you don't even own the instrument, they're like, 'Well, why should we give you the information about how our data is constructed? How do we know that you're not a competitor?' Right? I mean, and so these are the kinds of things that we then contact somebody who has a behind-the-scenes access to this so that we can, again, it's all of these little steps. "And I'm sure there's somebody who's gonna tweet, 'Well, why don't you just put all the raw data out on the internet?' For exactly the same reason you don't put the raw data from ancient DNA sequencing. Because people will make mistakes about it. And so, if I'm going to be involved, I'm not gonna make any mistakes like that. So I'm sorry if people want stuff early. "I think you know, perhaps, if... Well, if I had been running the whole show, nobody would even know what Skywatcher is right now. We'd just be collecting the data in a fully-stealthed mode. And...but, you know, it's...there's reasons, good reasons, why they wanted some publicity. And, you know, but I don't always get my way." Vinnie - 𝐕𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐬 𝕏: "Would you say that the data is exciting?" Nolan: "Oh, there's some interesting stuff in there. I mean, frankly, perhaps some of the better data that we have is just a couple of pictures from the ground of the helicopter with something about, you know, 200 feet in front of it. It's a clear blue sky and there's an object right in front of the helicopter. And the people in the helicopter said at the time that they couldn't see anything, even though we could see it from the ground. "But meanwhile, all of their instruments are going haywire. So, there was an effect. So why couldn't they see it? Maybe it was just out of view? Who knows? So it wasn't a lens flare, and it certainly wasn't a seagull. Mick (both laugh)." Vinnie: "Not in the desert anyway." Nolan: "I can't help myself." Vinnie: "I'm all for it. I'm sure Mick would, too. Hopefully. You know, James Fowler, we know he's left and moved on working with a new company. You know, all the best to him. Am I right in saying some of the technology being utilized by Skywatcher was proprietary to him, specifically? Maybe the dog whistle even? Is that still going to be able to be used by Skywatcher? How's that going to look going forward?" Nolan: "Umm, I'm not sure that we need the dog whistle at this point. And maybe there are ways to recreate it. I'm not party to the discussions around that. And so, we'll see where that goes." (That sounds like Fowler is NOT going to allow Skywatcher to use the dog whistle. That's a big disappointment. I mean, if this is really NHI and the dog whistle works 100% of the time, as claimed, then the whole world deserves to know about it.) Nolan: "I mean, James is not like, gone and forgotten. I mean, I could Signal chat him right now. And so he's there to help us. But, you know, my take on things is, you know, James has a life to live and a family to feed, and maybe his focus isn't entirely on UAP. He certainly has an interest in it. And maybe he has, you know, a company to build, and an opportunity that, actually, we all see now in terms of detecting drones. And, you know, if he wants to run a company like that then running around with a bunch of UAPologists might not be to that benefit. "And there might be a day when Skywatcher doesn't need to exist. The whole idea of Skywatcher is to show that something like this can be done, and it can be done in a serious way." (jakebarber claimed that they could BRING DOWN a craft. If that's true, it would change the world. What happened with that? Barber also said, "Who is operating [UAP]? How are they being operated? Where are they coming from? We should be able to answer those questions, probably entirely, in the next 12 months." Time is running out. Does he still stand behind that? Full Barber post with video clip: ) ~ Nolan: "I mean, I would...I, frankly, hope that if UAPDA - Disclosure Act is passed, because then the information that can be allowed to be out can be let out, and the stuff that needs to be kept secret stays secret. Again, I'm not, I would never advocate for a data dump." (I would 100% advocate for a data dump, minus details on anything that can be used as a weapon. Nobody, including the USG or private contractors owns this information. If it's gonna be a slow drip, for decades, then I fully support an Edward Snowden-type of leaker.) Nolan: "And so, you know, call it controlled disclosure, what have you. It needs to be done the proper way. And, you know, if any of the claims are true, there are reasons why you want to be methodical about it." (Who gets to decide what "the proper way" looks like? It seems like we're having more gatekeeping on top of the original gatekeeping. Not good.)

"I'm not sure that we need the dog whistle at this point. And maybe there are ways to re-create it." ~Nolan "There might be a day when Skywatcher doesn't need to exist." ~Nolan "If I had been running the whole show, nobody would even know what Skywatcher is right now." ~Nolan ~My comments in ( )~ Garry P. Nolan: "We've got a lot of data from multiple alleged sightings, both radar and other kinds of data. First it was about getting the raw-data files all put in one place because some of the data was collected by James (Fowler) before there was, officially, kind of a Skywatcher. "And so, getting that data, getting the instrument names that he used for those, then getting the technical manuals of what the settings might be and how much of that information is collected in the metadata when you're collecting the thing... All of this is just the organization that you need to do before you do anything else. "And then, getting from the companies how it is that they parse their raw data. Because some of these data files are put into...I wouldn't call them encrypted, but they're stacked into a certain kind of file structure - and I've seen the file structure - which is, you can think of it as a giant spreadsheet with headings and numbers for each of the columns and time on the row axis. "And so, you know, we've started looking at some of the data and put it into, let's say, 3D tracking. And it's clear that there are some things about the data that we needed to go back to the vendor who makes the instrument and say, 'Why is this and this and this happening, you know, every few dozen milliseconds?'" (I wonder if some of what they saw in their data, and labelled as anomalous, has maybe turned out to be a sensor artifact?) Nolan: "And so, you know, just getting an answer from these companies, often, when you don't even own the instrument, they're like, 'Well, why should we give you the information about how our data is constructed? How do we know that you're not a competitor?' Right? I mean, and so these are the kinds of things that we then contact somebody who has a behind-the-scenes access to this so that we can, again, it's all of these little steps. "And I'm sure there's somebody who's gonna tweet, 'Well, why don't you just put all the raw data out on the internet?' For exactly the same reason you don't put the raw data from ancient DNA sequencing. Because people will make mistakes about it. And so, if I'm going to be involved, I'm not gonna make any mistakes like that. So I'm sorry if people want stuff early. "I think you know, perhaps, if... Well, if I had been running the whole show, nobody would even know what Skywatcher is right now. We'd just be collecting the data in a fully-stealthed mode. And...but, you know, it's...there's reasons, good reasons, why they wanted some publicity. And, you know, but I don't always get my way." Vinnie - 𝐕𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐬 𝕏: "Would you say that the data is exciting?" Nolan: "Oh, there's some interesting stuff in there. I mean, frankly, perhaps some of the better data that we have is just a couple of pictures from the ground of the helicopter with something about, you know, 200 feet in front of it. It's a clear blue sky and there's an object right in front of the helicopter. And the people in the helicopter said at the time that they couldn't see anything, even though we could see it from the ground. "But meanwhile, all of their instruments are going haywire. So, there was an effect. So why couldn't they see it? Maybe it was just out of view? Who knows? So it wasn't a lens flare, and it certainly wasn't a seagull. Mick (both laugh)." Vinnie: "Not in the desert anyway." Nolan: "I can't help myself." Vinnie: "I'm all for it. I'm sure Mick would, too. Hopefully. You know, James Fowler, we know he's left and moved on working with a new company. You know, all the best to him. Am I right in saying some of the technology being utilized by Skywatcher was proprietary to him, specifically? Maybe the dog whistle even? Is that still going to be able to be used by Skywatcher? How's that going to look going forward?" Nolan: "Umm, I'm not sure that we need the dog whistle at this point. And maybe there are ways to recreate it. I'm not party to the discussions around that. And so, we'll see where that goes." (That sounds like Fowler is NOT going to allow Skywatcher to use the dog whistle. That's a big disappointment. I mean, if this is really NHI and the dog whistle works 100% of the time, as claimed, then the whole world deserves to know about it.) Nolan: "I mean, James is not like, gone and forgotten. I mean, I could Signal chat him right now. And so he's there to help us. But, you know, my take on things is, you know, James has a life to live and a family to feed, and maybe his focus isn't entirely on UAP. He certainly has an interest in it. And maybe he has, you know, a company to build, and an opportunity that, actually, we all see now in terms of detecting drones. And, you know, if he wants to run a company like that then running around with a bunch of UAPologists might not be to that benefit. "And there might be a day when Skywatcher doesn't need to exist. The whole idea of Skywatcher is to show that something like this can be done, and it can be done in a serious way." (jakebarber claimed that they could BRING DOWN a craft. If that's true, it would change the world. What happened with that? Barber also said, "Who is operating [UAP]? How are they being operated? Where are they coming from? We should be able to answer those questions, probably entirely, in the next 12 months." Time is running out. Does he still stand behind that? Full Barber post with video clip: ) ~ Nolan: "I mean, I would...I, frankly, hope that if UAPDA - Disclosure Act is passed, because then the information that can be allowed to be out can be let out, and the stuff that needs to be kept secret stays secret. Again, I'm not, I would never advocate for a data dump." (I would 100% advocate for a data dump, minus details on anything that can be used as a weapon. Nobody, including the USG or private contractors owns this information. If it's gonna be a slow drip, for decades, then I fully support an Edward Snowden-type of leaker.) Nolan: "And so, you know, call it controlled disclosure, what have you. It needs to be done the proper way. And, you know, if any of the claims are true, there are reasons why you want to be methodical about it." (Who gets to decide what "the proper way" looks like? It seems like we're having more gatekeeping on top of the original gatekeeping. Not good.)

Joe Murgia

32,437 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce