Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Steven Bartlett asks the uncomfortable question every employer faces: “What do I do? Give people three years off when they have a kid?” Erica Komisar’s blunt answer: “Give them as much time off as you possibly can — men and women, whoever is the primary attachment figure. Then give...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

454,443 subscribers

419,832 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Jordan Peterson drops a truth most modern families don’t want to hear: “Daycare under three — especially in the first year — is really not advisable. There isn’t any form of care that can replace a mother’s care in those early years.” He calls it “quite remarkable” that we’ve engineered a world where staying home with young children has become a luxury for most families — “as if by design.” Decades of research (still largely unchanged) shows the critical attachment window in the first 3 years is uniquely supported by consistent, responsive maternal care. Disruptions here correlate with measurable increases in stress reactivity, behavioral issues, and later emotional difficulties. The question we’re afraid to ask: Have we made motherhood incompatible with economic survival on purpose? Parents (especially moms of young kids): Do you feel this pressure — that staying home feels like a luxury you can’t afford? Or have you seen the difference in your own children between early daycare vs. being home those first years? Your honest take 👇
0:44

Jordan Peterson drops a truth most modern families don’t want to hear: “Daycare under three — especially in the first year — is really not advisable. There isn’t any form of care that can replace a mother’s care in those early years.” He calls it “quite remarkable” that we’ve engineered a world where staying home with young children has become a luxury for most families — “as if by design.” Decades of research (still largely unchanged) shows the critical attachment window in the first 3 years is uniquely supported by consistent, responsive maternal care. Disruptions here correlate with measurable increases in stress reactivity, behavioral issues, and later emotional difficulties. The question we’re afraid to ask: Have we made motherhood incompatible with economic survival on purpose? Parents (especially moms of young kids): Do you feel this pressure — that staying home feels like a luxury you can’t afford? Or have you seen the difference in your own children between early daycare vs. being home those first years? Your honest take 👇

Camus

931,748 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A German neurologist just issued a stark warning about “iPad kids”: More and more children are arriving at her clinic with speech delays, motor problems, and symptoms that look exactly like autism — but many of them dramatically improve the moment screens are taken away. Her explanation is blunt: Screens only send. They never respond. Young children learn language, social skills, and secure attachment through real back-and-forth interaction with people — not tablets or phones. Without that live human connection in the first years of life, kids miss a critical developmental window that closes after age two and never reopens. Long-term studies now link early smartphone access to worse mental health: more aggression, suicidal thoughts, and hallucinations. Her clear recommendation: zero screen time for children under 3. This one really stopped me cold as a parent. How strict are you with screen time for your young kids (especially under 3), and what’s been the hardest part about enforcing it?
4:06

A German neurologist just issued a stark warning about “iPad kids”: More and more children are arriving at her clinic with speech delays, motor problems, and symptoms that look exactly like autism — but many of them dramatically improve the moment screens are taken away. Her explanation is blunt: Screens only send. They never respond. Young children learn language, social skills, and secure attachment through real back-and-forth interaction with people — not tablets or phones. Without that live human connection in the first years of life, kids miss a critical developmental window that closes after age two and never reopens. Long-term studies now link early smartphone access to worse mental health: more aggression, suicidal thoughts, and hallucinations. Her clear recommendation: zero screen time for children under 3. This one really stopped me cold as a parent. How strict are you with screen time for your young kids (especially under 3), and what’s been the hardest part about enforcing it?

Camus

39,503 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Dr. Gabor Maté's direct message to parents (36-second clip): No matter your lifestyle, stay the primary attachment figure for your children. - Delay playdates until attachment is rock-solid. - Daycare or school? Don't assume they "still belong to you" when they come home—attachment can shift when kids spend most of their day away. - Socialization isn't something we force early; it happens naturally and healthily only when kids feel securely attached, safe in themselves, and individuated. Well-attached children socialize freely and spontaneously—no need to rush "exposure." This short clip challenges the modern "socialize early" push and reminds us attachment comes first. Parents: Have you noticed your child's behavior or sense of "belonging" change after long daycare/school days? Did delaying playdates or prioritizing one-on-one time make a difference for you? Or do you see early socialization as essential—why?
0:36

Dr. Gabor Maté's direct message to parents (36-second clip): No matter your lifestyle, stay the primary attachment figure for your children. - Delay playdates until attachment is rock-solid. - Daycare or school? Don't assume they "still belong to you" when they come home—attachment can shift when kids spend most of their day away. - Socialization isn't something we force early; it happens naturally and healthily only when kids feel securely attached, safe in themselves, and individuated. Well-attached children socialize freely and spontaneously—no need to rush "exposure." This short clip challenges the modern "socialize early" push and reminds us attachment comes first. Parents: Have you noticed your child's behavior or sense of "belonging" change after long daycare/school days? Did delaying playdates or prioritizing one-on-one time make a difference for you? Or do you see early socialization as essential—why?

Camus

110,780 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

It's wrong for parents to send their kids off to daycare just so they can "live their life" or work and not see them for the whole day. Children need at least one parent looking after them. Working is necessary, so one thing I would propose is for employers to offer in-office daycare services that will allow parents to attend to their children several times a day, and for work to mandate an hour-long break, only for parents and separate from their lunchbreak, so they can be with their kids. If more workplaces offered this, people would be more inclined to have children because the current system makes it very difficult for parents to be attentive and raise their kids and hold a good job at the same time.
0:58

It's wrong for parents to send their kids off to daycare just so they can "live their life" or work and not see them for the whole day. Children need at least one parent looking after them. Working is necessary, so one thing I would propose is for employers to offer in-office daycare services that will allow parents to attend to their children several times a day, and for work to mandate an hour-long break, only for parents and separate from their lunchbreak, so they can be with their kids. If more workplaces offered this, people would be more inclined to have children because the current system makes it very difficult for parents to be attentive and raise their kids and hold a good job at the same time.

Ian Miles Cheong

4,984,818 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Erica Komisar said something every parent needs to hear: The greatest gift you can give your kids isn’t perfect parenting. It’s loving your spouse, openly, warmly, with real affection, right in front of them. Your brain is plastic, especially early on. But even if your child is five, ten, or older, it’s never too late. The sooner you fix the “injury,” the faster real healing happens, just like a sprained ankle. Small changes in how you show up can shift everything almost immediately. Strong marriages don’t just make kids feel safe. They literally help wire their brains for security and love. Kids don’t need perfect parents. They need parents who love each other. What’s your honest take, how much does seeing real love between parents actually shape a child?
1:18

Erica Komisar said something every parent needs to hear: The greatest gift you can give your kids isn’t perfect parenting. It’s loving your spouse, openly, warmly, with real affection, right in front of them. Your brain is plastic, especially early on. But even if your child is five, ten, or older, it’s never too late. The sooner you fix the “injury,” the faster real healing happens, just like a sprained ankle. Small changes in how you show up can shift everything almost immediately. Strong marriages don’t just make kids feel safe. They literally help wire their brains for security and love. Kids don’t need perfect parents. They need parents who love each other. What’s your honest take, how much does seeing real love between parents actually shape a child?

Camus

84,066 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

A Church of England primary school in Lincolnshire is facing serious backlash after children as young as seven were asked to take part in Islamic prayer movements during a Religious Education lesson. For many parents, this raises real concerns. There’s a clear difference between teaching children about different religions and asking them to physically take part in religious practices. Education should inform not cross the line into participation. This is a Christian country with a long-standing cultural and religious heritage, and many are now questioning whether that identity is being respected within the school system. Parents send their children to school expecting them to learn, not to be placed in situations that may conflict with their own beliefs or values. it’s about boundaries, respect, and choice. Children, especially at such a young age, should not feel pressured to take part in any form of religious practice that they or their families may not agree with. Where do we draw the line? And who gets to decide what is appropriate in the classroom? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.
1:16

A Church of England primary school in Lincolnshire is facing serious backlash after children as young as seven were asked to take part in Islamic prayer movements during a Religious Education lesson. For many parents, this raises real concerns. There’s a clear difference between teaching children about different religions and asking them to physically take part in religious practices. Education should inform not cross the line into participation. This is a Christian country with a long-standing cultural and religious heritage, and many are now questioning whether that identity is being respected within the school system. Parents send their children to school expecting them to learn, not to be placed in situations that may conflict with their own beliefs or values. it’s about boundaries, respect, and choice. Children, especially at such a young age, should not feel pressured to take part in any form of religious practice that they or their families may not agree with. Where do we draw the line? And who gets to decide what is appropriate in the classroom? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

BB_MEDIA

12,131 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 This is absolutely disgusting. A woman sits with a little boy maybe 3-4 years old playing with toy trucks and asks him, “Do you ever play with your d#ck?” “Yes, and how does that feel?” “When do you do that? When we’re eating? In class?” Then it cuts to a 9 year old girl being taught in detail about her clit#ris “that little button” and how “it gives a very nice feeling” when you touch it. All branded with the World Health Organization logo. This isn’t fringe content. It’s the kind of comprehensive sexuality education some organizations push as normal for young kids. Parents, Is this what you want taught to your children? 🤢
1:35

Sensitive content

🚨 This is absolutely disgusting. A woman sits with a little boy maybe 3-4 years old playing with toy trucks and asks him, “Do you ever play with your d#ck?” “Yes, and how does that feel?” “When do you do that? When we’re eating? In class?” Then it cuts to a 9 year old girl being taught in detail about her clit#ris “that little button” and how “it gives a very nice feeling” when you touch it. All branded with the World Health Organization logo. This isn’t fringe content. It’s the kind of comprehensive sexuality education some organizations push as normal for young kids. Parents, Is this what you want taught to your children? 🤢

IRISH PATRIOT

303,133 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

When was the first time you learned that every decision involves a trade-off between risk and reward? It is a lesson that stays with us for life, especially in finance. And it is never too early to start introducing it to our children. Our 5th episode of Varsity Junior, The Watermelon Disaster, is all about understanding risk and reward :) Varsity Junior is very special to us💙. Hope your kids love it as much as we did working on it. By the way, if you haven't watched the previous 4 episodes, the playlist link is in the comments below.
10:25

When was the first time you learned that every decision involves a trade-off between risk and reward? It is a lesson that stays with us for life, especially in finance. And it is never too early to start introducing it to our children. Our 5th episode of Varsity Junior, The Watermelon Disaster, is all about understanding risk and reward :) Varsity Junior is very special to us💙. Hope your kids love it as much as we did working on it. By the way, if you haven't watched the previous 4 episodes, the playlist link is in the comments below.

Varsity

19,085 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

jihoon telling us to never hesitate in expressing our love to our parents while we still can 🥺 🐶 you guys might feel a little embarrassed and stuff, but those are just fleeting feelings 🐶 the time you can be with your parents is limited. you know what I mean? 🐶 I still have my parents, but it’ll be something i experience too someday. i think that if i wait until then to regret it, then it’ll be too late 🐶 even just another day of (our parents) being healthy, one more day of them being young… make memories (with them). even if they arent extraordinary memories, rather just small everyday memories. we should make that 🐶 I want to tell you that you don't have to hesitate (in expressing your feelings) 🐶 everyone, take the courage to do it just once.. if you're embarrassed now, you wont be embarrassed next time. 1st time is hard, 2nd time is easier, 3rd time is even easier, 4th time is even easier, and from the 5th time on, it becomes natural 🐶 so everyone.. don’t hesitate and express yourself as much as you can. 🐶 mom, i love you. dad, i love you too
2:26

jihoon telling us to never hesitate in expressing our love to our parents while we still can 🥺 🐶 you guys might feel a little embarrassed and stuff, but those are just fleeting feelings 🐶 the time you can be with your parents is limited. you know what I mean? 🐶 I still have my parents, but it’ll be something i experience too someday. i think that if i wait until then to regret it, then it’ll be too late 🐶 even just another day of (our parents) being healthy, one more day of them being young… make memories (with them). even if they arent extraordinary memories, rather just small everyday memories. we should make that 🐶 I want to tell you that you don't have to hesitate (in expressing your feelings) 🐶 everyone, take the courage to do it just once.. if you're embarrassed now, you wont be embarrassed next time. 1st time is hard, 2nd time is easier, 3rd time is even easier, 4th time is even easier, and from the 5th time on, it becomes natural 🐶 so everyone.. don’t hesitate and express yourself as much as you can. 🐶 mom, i love you. dad, i love you too

shan

13,396 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Gabor Maté delivered this raw, urgent wake-up call to parents: “When your kids spend the whole day at school and with peers, you have to win them back every single evening.” He doesn’t sugarcoat it: Quality time isn’t homework nagging or phone scrolling. It’s real presence — full attention, eye contact, genuine connection — to rebuild the bond that gets eroded by hours apart. “You can’t assume they’re your kids just because they’re your kids. You have to bring them under your wing.” In a world that constantly pulls kids in every direction, Maté reminds us: The most powerful thing you can give them isn’t money, gadgets, or lectures — it’s you, undivided. Parents: How do you “win back” your kids at the end of the day — and does this message still hit home for you?
0:45

Gabor Maté delivered this raw, urgent wake-up call to parents: “When your kids spend the whole day at school and with peers, you have to win them back every single evening.” He doesn’t sugarcoat it: Quality time isn’t homework nagging or phone scrolling. It’s real presence — full attention, eye contact, genuine connection — to rebuild the bond that gets eroded by hours apart. “You can’t assume they’re your kids just because they’re your kids. You have to bring them under your wing.” In a world that constantly pulls kids in every direction, Maté reminds us: The most powerful thing you can give them isn’t money, gadgets, or lectures — it’s you, undivided. Parents: How do you “win back” your kids at the end of the day — and does this message still hit home for you?

Camus

118,410 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

What if the real danger of smartphones for kids isn’t just “too much screen time” — but the age when they first get that dopamine hit? Erica Komisar explained that exposing children to high-dopamine activities (alcohol, marijuana, gambling, pornography, or social media) before the age of 16 can wire their brains to crave constant stimulation, making addiction or obsessiveness much more likely later on. If you wait until late adolescence, kids are far more capable of using these things consciously rather than becoming dependent on them. Her straightforward advice: Give kids a simple flip phone during those vulnerable early years instead of a full smartphone. It’s a sobering reminder that timing may matter more than we think when it comes to protecting developing brains. Have you noticed this pattern with kids (or even yourself) — that early heavy exposure to screens or other stimulants makes it much harder to cut back later?
1:45

What if the real danger of smartphones for kids isn’t just “too much screen time” — but the age when they first get that dopamine hit? Erica Komisar explained that exposing children to high-dopamine activities (alcohol, marijuana, gambling, pornography, or social media) before the age of 16 can wire their brains to crave constant stimulation, making addiction or obsessiveness much more likely later on. If you wait until late adolescence, kids are far more capable of using these things consciously rather than becoming dependent on them. Her straightforward advice: Give kids a simple flip phone during those vulnerable early years instead of a full smartphone. It’s a sobering reminder that timing may matter more than we think when it comes to protecting developing brains. Have you noticed this pattern with kids (or even yourself) — that early heavy exposure to screens or other stimulants makes it much harder to cut back later?

Camus

46,608 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Running for office as a mom of two toddlers hasn’t been easy. Honestly, there have been so many moments kicking myself for being late to preschool drop off, or trying to hold them while also calling voters at the same time. But in many ways, it’s the same struggle every parent faces—especially working parents in my generation. Being stretched thin paying for daycare, which for two kids, is the same price as our mortgage. Needing to take them to the doctor but not knowing whether your premiums will triple. Dropping them off at school and just praying they come home safe. My kids are my heart—the joy of my life. Whenever I question why I’m running this race, or whether I can do it, I look at them and know the answer. I’m running for their future. And I want every stressed out, overburdened parent out there to know: I’m fighting for your kids, too. And for you. 🫶🏽👶🏽
0:29

Running for office as a mom of two toddlers hasn’t been easy. Honestly, there have been so many moments kicking myself for being late to preschool drop off, or trying to hold them while also calling voters at the same time. But in many ways, it’s the same struggle every parent faces—especially working parents in my generation. Being stretched thin paying for daycare, which for two kids, is the same price as our mortgage. Needing to take them to the doctor but not knowing whether your premiums will triple. Dropping them off at school and just praying they come home safe. My kids are my heart—the joy of my life. Whenever I question why I’m running this race, or whether I can do it, I look at them and know the answer. I’m running for their future. And I want every stressed out, overburdened parent out there to know: I’m fighting for your kids, too. And for you. 🫶🏽👶🏽

Nida Allam ☀️

33,561 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Secure attachment during infancy lays the foundation for our lifelong mental and physical health. As I wind down this week’s series on infant/toddler attachment, I wanted to conclude with a few final words about why it matters so much. Obviously, strong relational connections between parents and children are beneficial in and of themselves. But there’s more to it than that. Attachment grounds and shapes our long-term mental health as well as our ability to enter into positive relationships with others. You see, children who are securely attached tend to be just that: Secure. This allows them to navigate the world independently, with confidence in themselves and their abilities. It almost seems contradictory that independence would spring from dependence. But it most surely does. The more love and care children receive during their earliest months and years and the more attentively and predictably their needs are met by treasured loved ones, the more they experience the world as safe place. And this is a gift to both the brain and the body. When the human body is not flooded daily with stress hormones and when anxiety occurs - not as a constant state - but more occasionally in response to life’s challenges, not only are we better prepared to deal with it - but our bodies don’t bear the long-term burden of a constant stress response. This is a fascinating area of early development that we are still only beginning to fully understand, but suffice it to say that positive early experiences - both in the home and in conjunction with high quality early education and care programs- are increasingly linked to lifelong health. This brain-body connection has huge implications not only for individual children, but for our public policy. A tweet is hardly the place to unpack this conversation in full, but know that my new book, The Daycare Myth (which can be ordered from the link in my bio) explores in detail the disconnect between what we know about the science of early development and how it is enacted (or, more frequently, not enacted) in our public policy. The costs - both developmentally and economically - are astronomical. And not only to individuals, but to taxpayers - who would be far better served by making small investments in getting things right in the first place than paying for the results of our inaction across the lifespan. It all begins with attachment. Thanks for following along this week! ——— This lovely video - which, to be clear, is NOT an illustration of insecure attachment - was shared to IG by olliejamesfaulds.
0:20

Secure attachment during infancy lays the foundation for our lifelong mental and physical health. As I wind down this week’s series on infant/toddler attachment, I wanted to conclude with a few final words about why it matters so much. Obviously, strong relational connections between parents and children are beneficial in and of themselves. But there’s more to it than that. Attachment grounds and shapes our long-term mental health as well as our ability to enter into positive relationships with others. You see, children who are securely attached tend to be just that: Secure. This allows them to navigate the world independently, with confidence in themselves and their abilities. It almost seems contradictory that independence would spring from dependence. But it most surely does. The more love and care children receive during their earliest months and years and the more attentively and predictably their needs are met by treasured loved ones, the more they experience the world as safe place. And this is a gift to both the brain and the body. When the human body is not flooded daily with stress hormones and when anxiety occurs - not as a constant state - but more occasionally in response to life’s challenges, not only are we better prepared to deal with it - but our bodies don’t bear the long-term burden of a constant stress response. This is a fascinating area of early development that we are still only beginning to fully understand, but suffice it to say that positive early experiences - both in the home and in conjunction with high quality early education and care programs- are increasingly linked to lifelong health. This brain-body connection has huge implications not only for individual children, but for our public policy. A tweet is hardly the place to unpack this conversation in full, but know that my new book, The Daycare Myth (which can be ordered from the link in my bio) explores in detail the disconnect between what we know about the science of early development and how it is enacted (or, more frequently, not enacted) in our public policy. The costs - both developmentally and economically - are astronomical. And not only to individuals, but to taxpayers - who would be far better served by making small investments in getting things right in the first place than paying for the results of our inaction across the lifespan. It all begins with attachment. Thanks for following along this week! ——— This lovely video - which, to be clear, is NOT an illustration of insecure attachment - was shared to IG by olliejamesfaulds.

Dan Wuori

101,524 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman: “Most people give up on things way too early” “Knowing when to quit and knowing when to give up on something, there’s no perfect answer to that. It’s really challenging to even get that approximately correct. But I think most people give up on things way too early.” Sam continues: “The mistake that most people make — particularly young entrepreneurs — is they try something, it does not immediately work, and after seven weeks, they say, ‘I tried this thing and it’s just not meant to be.’… The satirical version of this are people who are 23 and have started 14 startups because they give up on everyone before it could ever possibly be successful. These things are really hard. They take a really long time. There are a lot of critics. There are a lot of people who say: your thing sucks; it’s going to fail; it’s really stupid.” There’s also what Y Combinator calls “The Trough of Sorrow” where, as Sam describes, “no one even decides to say it sucks because no one cares at all. And that is at least as demotivating.” But this doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t work. Sam explains: “Most of the founders that I have spent a lot of time with that have gone on to be super successful spent a very long time on their idea when a lot of other people would have given up. Either people said it sucks, or people said nothing about it at all. And a framework that I have for when to give up versus when to keep working is that it should be an internal, rather than an external, decision. If people aren’t using it or people are saying it’s bad, that alone is not a reason to give up. You want to pay some attention to that — they might be right. But the best entrepreneurs I know make an internal decision about when to give up or when to keep working on something. It’s basically: when you have run out of ideas, and something is not working, then it is a good time to stop.” Video source: Y Combinator (2016)
1:43

Sam Altman: “Most people give up on things way too early” “Knowing when to quit and knowing when to give up on something, there’s no perfect answer to that. It’s really challenging to even get that approximately correct. But I think most people give up on things way too early.” Sam continues: “The mistake that most people make — particularly young entrepreneurs — is they try something, it does not immediately work, and after seven weeks, they say, ‘I tried this thing and it’s just not meant to be.’… The satirical version of this are people who are 23 and have started 14 startups because they give up on everyone before it could ever possibly be successful. These things are really hard. They take a really long time. There are a lot of critics. There are a lot of people who say: your thing sucks; it’s going to fail; it’s really stupid.” There’s also what Y Combinator calls “The Trough of Sorrow” where, as Sam describes, “no one even decides to say it sucks because no one cares at all. And that is at least as demotivating.” But this doesn’t necessarily mean it won’t work. Sam explains: “Most of the founders that I have spent a lot of time with that have gone on to be super successful spent a very long time on their idea when a lot of other people would have given up. Either people said it sucks, or people said nothing about it at all. And a framework that I have for when to give up versus when to keep working is that it should be an internal, rather than an external, decision. If people aren’t using it or people are saying it’s bad, that alone is not a reason to give up. You want to pay some attention to that — they might be right. But the best entrepreneurs I know make an internal decision about when to give up or when to keep working on something. It’s basically: when you have run out of ideas, and something is not working, then it is a good time to stop.” Video source: Y Combinator (2016)

Startup Archive

31,721 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why? This is why. This is our battle to fight until they can fight on their own beside us and then one day they will have to fight their battles without us. No, I don’t personally have children, I’m not sure if I’m able sometimes I’m not sure if I could handle the heartbreak of what I see this world becoming even if I could but God has a plan for me, I’ll leave that to Him and I and stay grateful and I will do everything I can in my life to protect your children. Babies are blessings. They are ALWAYS blessings. Human life is Gods gift and miracle to us. Evil tries to destroy children as early as possible if they can even make it out of the womb, that’s how much Satan hates humanity. Hurt people, hurt people. I hate this evil the most. One main reason I spoke out against the insanity the past 4 years was because I could see how hard it would be for parents to speak out and support their families. They faced cancellation and being fired for simply asking logical questions. I didn’t have children, I felt I could help shake the cage free to start having the conversations. There were mature conversations to be had but we were silenced, censored and fired if we so much as posted a meme or quote that signaled we might not be going along with the forced narrative. Parents, you have got your voices back now but never forget how hard they came for you and your children. They will do it again. This IS the hill to die on. Let’s make The United States a place where children are safe, in Jesus name, let that be what the U.S. becomes known for. Protecting children. ❤️🙏
1:30

Why? This is why. This is our battle to fight until they can fight on their own beside us and then one day they will have to fight their battles without us. No, I don’t personally have children, I’m not sure if I’m able sometimes I’m not sure if I could handle the heartbreak of what I see this world becoming even if I could but God has a plan for me, I’ll leave that to Him and I and stay grateful and I will do everything I can in my life to protect your children. Babies are blessings. They are ALWAYS blessings. Human life is Gods gift and miracle to us. Evil tries to destroy children as early as possible if they can even make it out of the womb, that’s how much Satan hates humanity. Hurt people, hurt people. I hate this evil the most. One main reason I spoke out against the insanity the past 4 years was because I could see how hard it would be for parents to speak out and support their families. They faced cancellation and being fired for simply asking logical questions. I didn’t have children, I felt I could help shake the cage free to start having the conversations. There were mature conversations to be had but we were silenced, censored and fired if we so much as posted a meme or quote that signaled we might not be going along with the forced narrative. Parents, you have got your voices back now but never forget how hard they came for you and your children. They will do it again. This IS the hill to die on. Let’s make The United States a place where children are safe, in Jesus name, let that be what the U.S. becomes known for. Protecting children. ❤️🙏

Gina Carano 🕯

208,999 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is a long tweet - but its worth a read - Reform UK’s Dr David Bull talking about family and whether parents should stay at home to look after their children: “You want to support marriage through the tax system and make it easier for parents to stay at home to look after their children - what's the reason behind that?” Dr David Bull: We believe that children do better in stable relationships across the board. And actually we need to encourage that. In marriage you think? Dr Bull: In marriage, and that marriage is an important bond, isn't it? Because I think what children desperately need is someone at home, and they need someone to be there and support them during that education. So we think that's a cornerstone, actually. And one of the things that I find really strange and very difficult to understand is the disconnect that children now have, because when you come home, you want to be able to offload what's been going on at school, and you need someone at home to be able to do that. And if we can incentivise that through tax breaks that has to be a good thing. Do you think if you're a child with two working parents, that's not a great upbringing for you? Dr Bull: No… Of course, it's incredibly difficult. And parents have to work because of the cost of living. But actually, the ideal would be to have a parent that is there available when children need them. You say in the manifesto that the majority of mothers would choose to stay at home more if they could. What's the research on that? Dr Bull: So we polled extensively, actually. But I think if you talk to any mother, of course, they want to spend time with their children. They want to see them grow and develop. And if you're spending all your time at work and you don't have enough time with your kids, I think that's a travesty. You think it's a travesty? Dr Bull: yes And do you think it damages the children as well? Dr Bull: I think emotionally, children need support as they grow and develop. There are lots of questions they have. You have to look at why children are now so obsessed with social media, and certainly from the point of view of having nephews and nieces that are being told all sorts of stuff on social media that needs correcting immediately. One of the biggest things we've seen is the rise of anorexia and bulimia in young women and in young boys as well. And what - do you think that might be because you don't have parents at home? Dr Bull: Well, I think actually the parents are there and they need to counter some of the myths that are on social media.
2:32

This is a long tweet - but its worth a read - Reform UK’s Dr David Bull talking about family and whether parents should stay at home to look after their children: “You want to support marriage through the tax system and make it easier for parents to stay at home to look after their children - what's the reason behind that?” Dr David Bull: We believe that children do better in stable relationships across the board. And actually we need to encourage that. In marriage you think? Dr Bull: In marriage, and that marriage is an important bond, isn't it? Because I think what children desperately need is someone at home, and they need someone to be there and support them during that education. So we think that's a cornerstone, actually. And one of the things that I find really strange and very difficult to understand is the disconnect that children now have, because when you come home, you want to be able to offload what's been going on at school, and you need someone at home to be able to do that. And if we can incentivise that through tax breaks that has to be a good thing. Do you think if you're a child with two working parents, that's not a great upbringing for you? Dr Bull: No… Of course, it's incredibly difficult. And parents have to work because of the cost of living. But actually, the ideal would be to have a parent that is there available when children need them. You say in the manifesto that the majority of mothers would choose to stay at home more if they could. What's the research on that? Dr Bull: So we polled extensively, actually. But I think if you talk to any mother, of course, they want to spend time with their children. They want to see them grow and develop. And if you're spending all your time at work and you don't have enough time with your kids, I think that's a travesty. You think it's a travesty? Dr Bull: yes And do you think it damages the children as well? Dr Bull: I think emotionally, children need support as they grow and develop. There are lots of questions they have. You have to look at why children are now so obsessed with social media, and certainly from the point of view of having nephews and nieces that are being told all sorts of stuff on social media that needs correcting immediately. One of the biggest things we've seen is the rise of anorexia and bulimia in young women and in young boys as well. And what - do you think that might be because you don't have parents at home? Dr Bull: Well, I think actually the parents are there and they need to counter some of the myths that are on social media.

Sophy Ridge

678,429 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

My name is Chris Elston, and I’m here to speak for children being irreversibly harmed by health professionals practicing what is falsely referred to as gender-affirming care. It is not caring to stop the development of children with puberty blockers. These are repurposed chemical castration and cancer drugs. It is not caring to alter their development with opposite-sex hormones. Every systematic review of the scientific literature shows that children are being harmed, and that scientific rigour is non-existent. Activist organizations pushing ideology have hijacked the medical community, and what is being done is nothing more than a live, unregulated experiment on kids. It is one of the great deceptions of our time to teach children that they might have been born in the wrong bodies! Affirming care would be to tell them that they are beautiful just as they are. No drugs or scalpels needed! Instead, children are being sterilized, and are having healthy body parts cut off. Overwhelmingly, these kids are autistic, have other mental health comorbidities, and many have suffered trauma or abuse. Girls as young as 12 are having their breasts removed, and 16-year-old boys are being castrated. State encroachment on parental rights is worsening outcomes. Here in Geneva, a child was taken from her parents because they refuse to transition her. Children have the human right to grow up with their bodies intact. It is time the Member States of the United Nations use the resolutions, procedures, and other tools at their disposal to stop this child abuse!
1:39

My name is Chris Elston, and I’m here to speak for children being irreversibly harmed by health professionals practicing what is falsely referred to as gender-affirming care. It is not caring to stop the development of children with puberty blockers. These are repurposed chemical castration and cancer drugs. It is not caring to alter their development with opposite-sex hormones. Every systematic review of the scientific literature shows that children are being harmed, and that scientific rigour is non-existent. Activist organizations pushing ideology have hijacked the medical community, and what is being done is nothing more than a live, unregulated experiment on kids. It is one of the great deceptions of our time to teach children that they might have been born in the wrong bodies! Affirming care would be to tell them that they are beautiful just as they are. No drugs or scalpels needed! Instead, children are being sterilized, and are having healthy body parts cut off. Overwhelmingly, these kids are autistic, have other mental health comorbidities, and many have suffered trauma or abuse. Girls as young as 12 are having their breasts removed, and 16-year-old boys are being castrated. State encroachment on parental rights is worsening outcomes. Here in Geneva, a child was taken from her parents because they refuse to transition her. Children have the human right to grow up with their bodies intact. It is time the Member States of the United Nations use the resolutions, procedures, and other tools at their disposal to stop this child abuse!

Billboard Chris 🌎

45,975 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

As a father of two young kids, I keep thinking about this from Dara: "I think we're doing our kids a disservice by giving them too much, being around too much. You want to love your kids, you want to know that they're absolutely loved and appreciated. But it's the challenges in life that form you, and it's the overcoming of these challenges that give humans a profound satisfaction. If you as a parent are overcoming these challenges for your kids, you're actually doing them a disservice long-term, whereas short-term you think you're doing them a favor. They've got to learn how to make it in this world themselves. A happy life is not necessarily an easy life."
1:12

As a father of two young kids, I keep thinking about this from Dara: "I think we're doing our kids a disservice by giving them too much, being around too much. You want to love your kids, you want to know that they're absolutely loved and appreciated. But it's the challenges in life that form you, and it's the overcoming of these challenges that give humans a profound satisfaction. If you as a parent are overcoming these challenges for your kids, you're actually doing them a disservice long-term, whereas short-term you think you're doing them a favor. They've got to learn how to make it in this world themselves. A happy life is not necessarily an easy life."

Patrick OShaughnessy

916,698 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Hirokazu Koreeda on how he directs Children: "Interviewer: I think 'Shoplifters' (2018) is very remarkable in showing different sides of a city and like you said, people who are pretty much invisible, but I do want to also commend you on another thing, is you often work with young actors, and they always tend to have a significant role in many of your films. How do you go about finding such dynamic young actors, and why do you often put these young people at the center of each one of your stories? Koreeda: First of all, I would say that I tend to make what I would call family dramas, and of course, you have to have children if you’re creating a family, but that’s how it started, but I found that as I did it, I became really interested. It became very interesting and fun to work with these children, and for example, the two children in this film, neither of them had any acting experience at all before this film. I brought them in, and what I find when you bring these children in, and you work with them is that the adult actors change. They become much more lively and natural in the way that they act, and I guess, at some point, I realized this, and I guess, became really attracted to the idea of having children and the impact that it had. Interviewer: Do you find that there is any struggle in terms of working with young actors, or in this case, young children who have not actually acted before? Koreeda: Just to clarify, I have worked with children in many of my films, and all of them have never had experienced before. I always go out and pick non-acting children to work in my films, so just, I wanted to put that out there. In terms of the struggle, it does take time. You have to give extra time to work with these children. When I choose these children, I have an audition, and I pick out who I want to the audition, and then when we get to set, I never give them the script. No child that I’ve worked with has been given a script beforehand, and when I get to the actual part where they’re going to be acting, I give them the lines myself, and work with them and coach them. What I find is that it’s actually really enjoyable, both for them and for myself that way. I also, because I’ve been doing this now for several years, I tend to have a fairly high success rate in choosing children that are able to work with me in that way. Interviewer: That’s fascinating, and it also shows how you are able to create such authentic performances from these child actors over and over again in so many of your films. I think it’s a unique gift that you have, and it’s something that very few directors, I think, here in the United States do. Koreeda: It’s true, I guess by working with these children, I learned. I discovered that the best way to do it was just to communicate verbally their lines, rather than giving them in a written format, and over time, this really worked, and so I just kept doing it. But, interestingly, I loved the movie 'Kramer vs Kramer' (1979), directed by Robert Benton, and one time I bought the movie with all the extra, the making of and everything, and I went over it, and I found through that, that in fact, the child in that movie was also given his lines every day by the assistant director each morning when they came in to set, so I discovered that it wasn’t just me that was doing this." (Koreeda's interview with Scott Menzel, We Live Entertainment, 2018)
1:23

Hirokazu Koreeda on how he directs Children: "Interviewer: I think 'Shoplifters' (2018) is very remarkable in showing different sides of a city and like you said, people who are pretty much invisible, but I do want to also commend you on another thing, is you often work with young actors, and they always tend to have a significant role in many of your films. How do you go about finding such dynamic young actors, and why do you often put these young people at the center of each one of your stories? Koreeda: First of all, I would say that I tend to make what I would call family dramas, and of course, you have to have children if you’re creating a family, but that’s how it started, but I found that as I did it, I became really interested. It became very interesting and fun to work with these children, and for example, the two children in this film, neither of them had any acting experience at all before this film. I brought them in, and what I find when you bring these children in, and you work with them is that the adult actors change. They become much more lively and natural in the way that they act, and I guess, at some point, I realized this, and I guess, became really attracted to the idea of having children and the impact that it had. Interviewer: Do you find that there is any struggle in terms of working with young actors, or in this case, young children who have not actually acted before? Koreeda: Just to clarify, I have worked with children in many of my films, and all of them have never had experienced before. I always go out and pick non-acting children to work in my films, so just, I wanted to put that out there. In terms of the struggle, it does take time. You have to give extra time to work with these children. When I choose these children, I have an audition, and I pick out who I want to the audition, and then when we get to set, I never give them the script. No child that I’ve worked with has been given a script beforehand, and when I get to the actual part where they’re going to be acting, I give them the lines myself, and work with them and coach them. What I find is that it’s actually really enjoyable, both for them and for myself that way. I also, because I’ve been doing this now for several years, I tend to have a fairly high success rate in choosing children that are able to work with me in that way. Interviewer: That’s fascinating, and it also shows how you are able to create such authentic performances from these child actors over and over again in so many of your films. I think it’s a unique gift that you have, and it’s something that very few directors, I think, here in the United States do. Koreeda: It’s true, I guess by working with these children, I learned. I discovered that the best way to do it was just to communicate verbally their lines, rather than giving them in a written format, and over time, this really worked, and so I just kept doing it. But, interestingly, I loved the movie 'Kramer vs Kramer' (1979), directed by Robert Benton, and one time I bought the movie with all the extra, the making of and everything, and I went over it, and I found through that, that in fact, the child in that movie was also given his lines every day by the assistant director each morning when they came in to set, so I discovered that it wasn’t just me that was doing this." (Koreeda's interview with Scott Menzel, We Live Entertainment, 2018)

DepressedBergman

49,522 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten