正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 Stop Islamic domination! Mosques shouldn't be playing prayers over loudspeakers Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Every Friday, a... government-approved Islamic call to prayer is now being broadcast over downtown Regina. Some people have tried to dismiss concerns about this as nothing more than a complaint about noise. They're wrong. This isn't simply about noise pollution. It's about changing the character of our shared public spaces without public debate and placing an explicitly religious message at the centre of civic life. A source tells Rebel News that this permit was approved by Regina police without ever being brought before Regina city council for public discussion. That should concern every Canadian, regardless of their faith. This isn't like an innocuous church bell. Church bells are tones. They function much like a clock tower, marking the passage of time or calling a congregation together without conveying a specific theological message to everyone within earshot. The Adhan is something entirely different. It is a spoken religious proclamation: "Allah is the Greatest," "I bear witness that there is no god but Allah," "I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah." This is not merely a sound in the background of city life. It is an explicit religious and ideological message being amplified over an entire downtown core. For many Canadians, this raises a much larger question: should governments be facilitating the projection of a particular religion's message into our common civic spaces? Canada has long embraced freedom of religion. Every Canadian should be free to worship, pray, and practice their faith in peace. But freedom of religion is not the same thing as religious domination. No religion should expect the public square to conform to its practices, and no faith should enjoy special privileges that allow it to reshape our common spaces without public consent. Many Canadians also see this as part of a broader trend of increasingly visible Islamic claims over public spaces, whether through amplified calls to prayer or organized prayers in streets and public squares rather than in houses of worship. You may agree with those concerns, or you may not. But Canadians have every right to discuss them. At the same time, residents who object to this decision are now being met with police warnings about hate crimes and increased monitoring of online commentary. The effect is chilling. Many Canadians will reasonably wonder whether they can even voice their opposition without attracting police attention. Let's be clear. Criticizing a government decision is not a hate crime. Questioning a permit is not a hate crime. Saying, "I don't want religious messages blasted over my downtown," is not a hate crime. Free citizens have the right to object to decisions made in their name, using public authority, and affecting their communities. That's not hate. That's democracy. If government agencies can authorize this in Regina without public consultation, they can do it anywhere. Today it's Regina. Tomorrow it could be your city. That's why we're launching sign the petition and fund out independent journalism. Because our shared civic spaces belong to everyone, and Canadians deserve a voice before they are fundamentally changed.show more

Rebel News

653,770 subscribers

17,521 次观看 • 18 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Most Canadians have no idea what the Islamic call to prayer actually says. The media give Canadians a gentle one-line summary and stop there. They do not broadcast the full words. The full text is harder to wave away. Many hear it as a claim of dominion over the ground it covers. The media translate it as "Allah is great." That is wrong. The word is akbar, the comparative. It means greater, as in greater than all else. "Great" hides what the word actually claims. The 'call to prayer' is an aggressive public religious proclamation declaring that Allah is greater, that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is Allah’s messenger. When amplified over a city, it asserts Islamic theology into shared civic space. One direction. On a schedule. Heard as a claim of dominion over the ground it covers. Dominion. Canadians used to call this country The Dominion of Canada. Canadians should not be bullied into pretending that this is just a harmless cultural chime like a church bell. Canadians have every right to object to the precedent in Regina, Saskatchewan. Amplified Muslim religious proclamations should not be allowed in Canada. We have seen what became of the United Kingdom, and its own government is now investigating the Muslim rape gangs and the cover-up. Islamic scriptures, tradition and classical law contain commands to fight and subjugate unbelievers, and to kill apostates. They permit the enslavement of non-Muslim captives and their use as sexual property. These have never been formally repealed. They remain the position of all four Sunni schools, and they are still issued as religious rulings today. The troubling point is not that every Muslim acts on these texts. Plainly they do not. The troubling point is that the texts remain unrepealed, taught as authoritative, and still acted upon by those who choose to. Regina is 'the camel's nose under the tent.' Thanks to Rupa Subramanya for the video. The Muslim Call to Prayer - Sunni version as in Regina Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar God is greater, God is greater. God is greater, God is greater. Ashhadu an la ilaha illa Allah — twice I bear witness that there is no god but Allah. Ashhadu anna Muhammadan rasul Allah — twice I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. Hayya ʿala al-salah — twice Come to prayer. Hayya ʿala al-falah — twice Come to success. Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar God is greater, God is greater. La ilaha illa Allah There is no god but Allah.

Most Canadians have no idea what the Islamic call to prayer actually says. The media give Canadians a gentle one-line summary and stop there. They do not broadcast the full words. The full text is harder to wave away. Many hear it as a claim of dominion over the ground it covers. The media translate it as "Allah is great." That is wrong. The word is akbar, the comparative. It means greater, as in greater than all else. "Great" hides what the word actually claims. The 'call to prayer' is an aggressive public religious proclamation declaring that Allah is greater, that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is Allah’s messenger. When amplified over a city, it asserts Islamic theology into shared civic space. One direction. On a schedule. Heard as a claim of dominion over the ground it covers. Dominion. Canadians used to call this country The Dominion of Canada. Canadians should not be bullied into pretending that this is just a harmless cultural chime like a church bell. Canadians have every right to object to the precedent in Regina, Saskatchewan. Amplified Muslim religious proclamations should not be allowed in Canada. We have seen what became of the United Kingdom, and its own government is now investigating the Muslim rape gangs and the cover-up. Islamic scriptures, tradition and classical law contain commands to fight and subjugate unbelievers, and to kill apostates. They permit the enslavement of non-Muslim captives and their use as sexual property. These have never been formally repealed. They remain the position of all four Sunni schools, and they are still issued as religious rulings today. The troubling point is not that every Muslim acts on these texts. Plainly they do not. The troubling point is that the texts remain unrepealed, taught as authoritative, and still acted upon by those who choose to. Regina is 'the camel's nose under the tent.' Thanks to Rupa Subramanya for the video. The Muslim Call to Prayer - Sunni version as in Regina Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar God is greater, God is greater. God is greater, God is greater. Ashhadu an la ilaha illa Allah — twice I bear witness that there is no god but Allah. Ashhadu anna Muhammadan rasul Allah — twice I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. Hayya ʿala al-salah — twice Come to prayer. Hayya ʿala al-falah — twice Come to success. Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar God is greater, God is greater. La ilaha illa Allah There is no god but Allah.

DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

61,691 次观看 • 17 天前

Regina just became the first Canadian downtown to blast the Muslim call to prayer over public loudspeakers — right across from City Hall. Ben Mulroney said he’s uncomfortable with it. Well Ben… SO AM I!! He’s right!! And every Canadian who still gives a damn about this country should be too!! This isn’t church bells!! Church bells chime. They don’t repeat “Allah is the greatest” and “There is no god but Allah” five times a day in Arabic for the whole street to hear. One is neutral sound. The other is a public declaration of religious supremacy and the rejection of every other faith. Ben nailed the difference. I’ll say it louder: You want to pray? Do it in your mosque! Do it in your home! Do it quietly like the rest of us!! But don’t turn our public streets and sidewalks into your personal broadcast system!!! Canada was built on Judeo-Christian foundations. Not imported megaphone dawah. This is what “diversity” looks like when it only goes one way — and the people who built this country are expected to sit down and take it. Enough!!! Canada First means Canadian streets, Canadian soundscape, and Canadian culture come first. Not this!! #cdnpoli #Regina #Saskatchewan #CanadaFirst

Regina just became the first Canadian downtown to blast the Muslim call to prayer over public loudspeakers — right across from City Hall. Ben Mulroney said he’s uncomfortable with it. Well Ben… SO AM I!! He’s right!! And every Canadian who still gives a damn about this country should be too!! This isn’t church bells!! Church bells chime. They don’t repeat “Allah is the greatest” and “There is no god but Allah” five times a day in Arabic for the whole street to hear. One is neutral sound. The other is a public declaration of religious supremacy and the rejection of every other faith. Ben nailed the difference. I’ll say it louder: You want to pray? Do it in your mosque! Do it in your home! Do it quietly like the rest of us!! But don’t turn our public streets and sidewalks into your personal broadcast system!!! Canada was built on Judeo-Christian foundations. Not imported megaphone dawah. This is what “diversity” looks like when it only goes one way — and the people who built this country are expected to sit down and take it. Enough!!! Canada First means Canadian streets, Canadian soundscape, and Canadian culture come first. Not this!! #cdnpoli #Regina #Saskatchewan #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

1,197,969 次观看 • 21 天前

Too many are too polite to say this. But mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The adhan - which declares there is no god but allah and Muhammad is his messenger - is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination. Perform these rituals in mosques if you wish. But they are not welcome in our public places and shared institutions. And given their explicit repudiation of Christianity they certainly do not belong in our churches and cathedrals. I am not suggesting everybody at Trafalgar Square last night is an Islamist. But the domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook. Trafalgar Square belongs to all of us. It is a national memorial to our independence and our salvation. Last night was not like a televised football match or a St Patrick’s Day celebration. It was an act of domination and therefore division. It shouldn’t happen again.

Too many are too polite to say this. But mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The adhan - which declares there is no god but allah and Muhammad is his messenger - is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination. Perform these rituals in mosques if you wish. But they are not welcome in our public places and shared institutions. And given their explicit repudiation of Christianity they certainly do not belong in our churches and cathedrals. I am not suggesting everybody at Trafalgar Square last night is an Islamist. But the domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook. Trafalgar Square belongs to all of us. It is a national memorial to our independence and our salvation. Last night was not like a televised football match or a St Patrick’s Day celebration. It was an act of domination and therefore division. It shouldn’t happen again.

Nick Timothy MP

7,271,707 次观看 • 3 个月前

A Church of England primary school in Lincolnshire is facing serious backlash after children as young as seven were asked to take part in Islamic prayer movements during a Religious Education lesson. For many parents, this raises real concerns. There’s a clear difference between teaching children about different religions and asking them to physically take part in religious practices. Education should inform not cross the line into participation. This is a Christian country with a long-standing cultural and religious heritage, and many are now questioning whether that identity is being respected within the school system. Parents send their children to school expecting them to learn, not to be placed in situations that may conflict with their own beliefs or values. it’s about boundaries, respect, and choice. Children, especially at such a young age, should not feel pressured to take part in any form of religious practice that they or their families may not agree with. Where do we draw the line? And who gets to decide what is appropriate in the classroom? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

A Church of England primary school in Lincolnshire is facing serious backlash after children as young as seven were asked to take part in Islamic prayer movements during a Religious Education lesson. For many parents, this raises real concerns. There’s a clear difference between teaching children about different religions and asking them to physically take part in religious practices. Education should inform not cross the line into participation. This is a Christian country with a long-standing cultural and religious heritage, and many are now questioning whether that identity is being respected within the school system. Parents send their children to school expecting them to learn, not to be placed in situations that may conflict with their own beliefs or values. it’s about boundaries, respect, and choice. Children, especially at such a young age, should not feel pressured to take part in any form of religious practice that they or their families may not agree with. Where do we draw the line? And who gets to decide what is appropriate in the classroom? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

BB_MEDIA

12,131 次观看 • 3 个月前

Canada liberal government has 3 bills that when passed will be their most destructive bills ever put into law Free speech will be ended, Canadians will be thrown in prison for social media posts, warrantless searches of phones, pre-crime punishments and even open your mail Bill C-2 - empowers government employees, not police, to open your mail, search your phone or computer — all without a warrant. Bill C-8 - gives cabinet ministers the power to kick Canadians off the internet, impose fines, and demand data — no judge, no police review. Bill C-9 - removes legal safeguards around free speech. Justice Centre expands “hate” prosecutions. Online Harms Act - brings pre-crime punishment: house arrest, ankle bracelets, curfews for people who haven’t committed a crime. Because they might. “If the Online Harms Act is brought back and passed into law, you're gonna see the Canadian Human Rights Commission with massive new powers to prosecute Canadians over offensive non-criminal speech with penalties up to $50,000” (This is a bill that insiders say is about to be revived and passed with the 3 above) “Canada will be a police state by Christmas if Parliament passes bills C2, C8, and C9 in their current form. C2 is the Strong Borders Act. It should be called the Strong Surveillance Act. It empowers Canada Post to open letter mail without a warrant. It criminalizes the use of cash in amounts greater than $10,000. And it empowers a vast army of government officials, not just police, to conduct warrantless searches of the computers and cell phones of Canadians. It is a massive invasion of privacy. It's extremely dangerous.” “You're gonna see a Digital Safety Commission with a vast army of bureaucrats to enforce federal regulations that are passed in respective of the internet and internet contents. And you're gonna see Canadians punished preemptively because their neighbor fears that they might commit a hate speech crime in future, the Online Harms Act would authorize judges to place Canadians under house arrest, wearing an ankle bracelet and respect a curfew, et cetera. Giving the federal government, giving federal cabinet ministers power to kick Canadians off the internet is not necessary for protecting public safety or defending our national security.”

Canada liberal government has 3 bills that when passed will be their most destructive bills ever put into law Free speech will be ended, Canadians will be thrown in prison for social media posts, warrantless searches of phones, pre-crime punishments and even open your mail Bill C-2 - empowers government employees, not police, to open your mail, search your phone or computer — all without a warrant. Bill C-8 - gives cabinet ministers the power to kick Canadians off the internet, impose fines, and demand data — no judge, no police review. Bill C-9 - removes legal safeguards around free speech. Justice Centre expands “hate” prosecutions. Online Harms Act - brings pre-crime punishment: house arrest, ankle bracelets, curfews for people who haven’t committed a crime. Because they might. “If the Online Harms Act is brought back and passed into law, you're gonna see the Canadian Human Rights Commission with massive new powers to prosecute Canadians over offensive non-criminal speech with penalties up to $50,000” (This is a bill that insiders say is about to be revived and passed with the 3 above) “Canada will be a police state by Christmas if Parliament passes bills C2, C8, and C9 in their current form. C2 is the Strong Borders Act. It should be called the Strong Surveillance Act. It empowers Canada Post to open letter mail without a warrant. It criminalizes the use of cash in amounts greater than $10,000. And it empowers a vast army of government officials, not just police, to conduct warrantless searches of the computers and cell phones of Canadians. It is a massive invasion of privacy. It's extremely dangerous.” “You're gonna see a Digital Safety Commission with a vast army of bureaucrats to enforce federal regulations that are passed in respective of the internet and internet contents. And you're gonna see Canadians punished preemptively because their neighbor fears that they might commit a hate speech crime in future, the Online Harms Act would authorize judges to place Canadians under house arrest, wearing an ankle bracelet and respect a curfew, et cetera. Giving the federal government, giving federal cabinet ministers power to kick Canadians off the internet is not necessary for protecting public safety or defending our national security.”

Wall Street Apes

172,397 次观看 • 9 个月前

Deputy Prime Minister of Canada Chrystia Freeland today commenting about the documentary. “There is a film that is due to be screened at Tiff today in Toronto about Russian soldiers at War. Ukrainian diplomats and the Ukrainian Canadian Community have expressed really grave concerns about that film and I do want to say I share those concerns. We have to be really clear that this is a war where there is no moral equivalency this is a war of Russian aggression this is a war where Russia is breaking international law and committing war crimes. There is very clearly good and evil in this war. Ukrainians are fighting for their sovereignty and for democracy around the world and we as a country have to be very, very clear that there can be no moral equivalency in our understanding of this conflict. It's not right for Canadian public money to be supporting the screening and production of a film like this.”

Deputy Prime Minister of Canada Chrystia Freeland today commenting about the documentary. “There is a film that is due to be screened at Tiff today in Toronto about Russian soldiers at War. Ukrainian diplomats and the Ukrainian Canadian Community have expressed really grave concerns about that film and I do want to say I share those concerns. We have to be really clear that this is a war where there is no moral equivalency this is a war of Russian aggression this is a war where Russia is breaking international law and committing war crimes. There is very clearly good and evil in this war. Ukrainians are fighting for their sovereignty and for democracy around the world and we as a country have to be very, very clear that there can be no moral equivalency in our understanding of this conflict. It's not right for Canadian public money to be supporting the screening and production of a film like this.”

Halibitch Angela 🇨🇦 🇺🇦

216,190 次观看 • 1 年前

Canadians mail should not be accessed without a warrant. Canadians should not be kicked off the internet without due process. Canadians should not be threated with unprecedented police powers to suppress speech online. But for every societal problem, the Liberals' first instinct is to erode the freedoms of Canadians. Thank you to the many residents of York-Durham who have written to me about this. I will keep fighting against the kinds of attacks on personal freedom the government has introduced in Bills C-2, C-8, and C-9.

Canadians mail should not be accessed without a warrant. Canadians should not be kicked off the internet without due process. Canadians should not be threated with unprecedented police powers to suppress speech online. But for every societal problem, the Liberals' first instinct is to erode the freedoms of Canadians. Thank you to the many residents of York-Durham who have written to me about this. I will keep fighting against the kinds of attacks on personal freedom the government has introduced in Bills C-2, C-8, and C-9.

Jacob Mantle

76,218 次观看 • 8 个月前

You may not agree with me, but you will always know where you stand with me. Today in Billericay, a heckler tried to shout me down as I spoke about the normalisation of hatred towards Jews. I did not back down, because it needs to be said. British Jews are being targeted and too many people are pretending this is the same experience of other minorities. This lady implied Muslims are being similarly targeted. This is simply not true. Let's be honest about what is happening. Certain groups (in particular but not solely Islamic Extremists) are creating a climate of fear and intimidation that is normalising Jew hatred. I will never stand for that. Governments have spent too long hand-wringing, making excuses and hoping it would go away. It is time to call this what it is: a national emergency in our attitude, our urgency and our response. I will always engage with people who disagree with me. That is politics. But there is a difference between argument and intimidation. Shouting does not make a bad case good. It's done to silence others. And it certainly does not change the truth. The truth is that British Jews have been made to feel less safe in their own country. Our country. They are being singled out, threatened and harassed in ways that should shame everyone in public life. If we do not stand up now and stop this rise in antisemitism, then why bother saying "Never Again" at Holocaust Memorial Day? Because this is how it starts. I am not prepared to play along with the pretence that this is normal, or manageable, or just another example of tension between groups. It really is not. It is targeted hatred and it is getting worse. So my message is simple. Not here. Not in Britain. And not on our watch. We need to stop the hand-wringing and start doing the right thing. That means standing with British Jews openly, unapologetically and without fear.

You may not agree with me, but you will always know where you stand with me. Today in Billericay, a heckler tried to shout me down as I spoke about the normalisation of hatred towards Jews. I did not back down, because it needs to be said. British Jews are being targeted and too many people are pretending this is the same experience of other minorities. This lady implied Muslims are being similarly targeted. This is simply not true. Let's be honest about what is happening. Certain groups (in particular but not solely Islamic Extremists) are creating a climate of fear and intimidation that is normalising Jew hatred. I will never stand for that. Governments have spent too long hand-wringing, making excuses and hoping it would go away. It is time to call this what it is: a national emergency in our attitude, our urgency and our response. I will always engage with people who disagree with me. That is politics. But there is a difference between argument and intimidation. Shouting does not make a bad case good. It's done to silence others. And it certainly does not change the truth. The truth is that British Jews have been made to feel less safe in their own country. Our country. They are being singled out, threatened and harassed in ways that should shame everyone in public life. If we do not stand up now and stop this rise in antisemitism, then why bother saying "Never Again" at Holocaust Memorial Day? Because this is how it starts. I am not prepared to play along with the pretence that this is normal, or manageable, or just another example of tension between groups. It really is not. It is targeted hatred and it is getting worse. So my message is simple. Not here. Not in Britain. And not on our watch. We need to stop the hand-wringing and start doing the right thing. That means standing with British Jews openly, unapologetically and without fear.

Kemi Badenoch

2,194,951 次观看 • 2 个月前

Broken Windows Theory is a way of giving an intellectual grounding for your objections to the state of urban decay in many major cities in America. As I alluded to earlier, there's a public campaign that is asking you not to care about what happens to our cities. It is asking you not to care that people sleep in public, that people sell sex, that people do drugs. It is saying that you should not notice those things, that is arbitrary, racist, and unjust. And my argument is that actually you, as a member of the community with an equal right to enjoyment of the public and public space, have every legitimate and objective reason to say, "No, I don't need to put up with that and I don't need to vote for people, I don't need to endorse political projects that hold that as a legitimate view." Broken windows theory was successful because it's true, but also because it gave advocates of law and order a reason and an argumentative justification for reclaiming their cities—in the 1990s, for saying, "We don't need to put up with what New York City is like. We can and should demand better than this." Public disorder really does strike at the heart of our society. The community really does have an interest in keeping the peace over and above endless criminal license. We recognize that for hundreds of years in this country, [as did] our legal forefathers, because it's true. And therefore you do not need to be bullied into believing otherwise. - Me University of Austin (UATX)

Broken Windows Theory is a way of giving an intellectual grounding for your objections to the state of urban decay in many major cities in America. As I alluded to earlier, there's a public campaign that is asking you not to care about what happens to our cities. It is asking you not to care that people sleep in public, that people sell sex, that people do drugs. It is saying that you should not notice those things, that is arbitrary, racist, and unjust. And my argument is that actually you, as a member of the community with an equal right to enjoyment of the public and public space, have every legitimate and objective reason to say, "No, I don't need to put up with that and I don't need to vote for people, I don't need to endorse political projects that hold that as a legitimate view." Broken windows theory was successful because it's true, but also because it gave advocates of law and order a reason and an argumentative justification for reclaiming their cities—in the 1990s, for saying, "We don't need to put up with what New York City is like. We can and should demand better than this." Public disorder really does strike at the heart of our society. The community really does have an interest in keeping the peace over and above endless criminal license. We recognize that for hundreds of years in this country, [as did] our legal forefathers, because it's true. And therefore you do not need to be bullied into believing otherwise. - Me University of Austin (UATX)

Charles Fain Lehman

20,440 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kemi Badenoch disaster of an interview criticising the Ramadan Tent Project's Iftar at Trafalgar Square is something to behold 😅 Ramadan Tent Project did it without objection under 4 Conservative PMs: 2015 under David Cameron 2019 under Theresa May 2022 under Boris Johnson 2024 under Rishi Sunak Gary Gibbon, "What is your objection to the Muslim prayer that happened in Trafalgar square" Kemi Badenoch, "As a woman from an ethnic minority background, I do not like to see women shoved to the side, segregated, in an event that is not welcoming to others" "Trafalgar square is a public space which we use for inclusive events" Gary Gibbon, "But the event was welcoming. It was inclusive. It was inviting other people to come and see what the moment was like" *Badenoch's eye lashes flash faster than a butterfly chasing nectar* Kemi Badenoch, "A segregated event like that, I do not think the Mayor should be party political" Gary Gibbon, "So gender segregation is your objection?" Kemi Badenoch, "Yes, but more than that" Gary Gibbon, "But lots of religions have gender segregation" Kemi Badenoch, "Not in public spaces. This is not about freedom of religion" Gary Gibbon, "The Ramadan Tent project organised events at the Victoria & Albert museum, in front of the Royal Albert Hall, under Conservative administrations" "They've been developing this public way of showing their faith and inviting people to come and observe it" Kemi Badenoch, "Without knowing the details of those events, I'm not making a comment" "I'm taking a specific event about that type of mass prayer, segregating women in the middle of Trafalgar square" "We believe in religious freedom, that doesn't mean any religious practice in every single religion" "Sometimes the authorities need to set guard rails and say actually this is too much"

Kemi Badenoch disaster of an interview criticising the Ramadan Tent Project's Iftar at Trafalgar Square is something to behold 😅 Ramadan Tent Project did it without objection under 4 Conservative PMs: 2015 under David Cameron 2019 under Theresa May 2022 under Boris Johnson 2024 under Rishi Sunak Gary Gibbon, "What is your objection to the Muslim prayer that happened in Trafalgar square" Kemi Badenoch, "As a woman from an ethnic minority background, I do not like to see women shoved to the side, segregated, in an event that is not welcoming to others" "Trafalgar square is a public space which we use for inclusive events" Gary Gibbon, "But the event was welcoming. It was inclusive. It was inviting other people to come and see what the moment was like" Badenoch's eye lashes flash faster than a butterfly chasing nectar Kemi Badenoch, "A segregated event like that, I do not think the Mayor should be party political" Gary Gibbon, "So gender segregation is your objection?" Kemi Badenoch, "Yes, but more than that" Gary Gibbon, "But lots of religions have gender segregation" Kemi Badenoch, "Not in public spaces. This is not about freedom of religion" Gary Gibbon, "The Ramadan Tent project organised events at the Victoria & Albert museum, in front of the Royal Albert Hall, under Conservative administrations" "They've been developing this public way of showing their faith and inviting people to come and observe it" Kemi Badenoch, "Without knowing the details of those events, I'm not making a comment" "I'm taking a specific event about that type of mass prayer, segregating women in the middle of Trafalgar square" "We believe in religious freedom, that doesn't mean any religious practice in every single religion" "Sometimes the authorities need to set guard rails and say actually this is too much"

Farrukh

130,349 次观看 • 3 个月前

California Sheriff Is Not Afraid To Speak The Truth “We are here today because California public safety is in crisis. Crime is steadily on the rise and our public safety policy is one of the worst, if not the worst in the nation. I wanna make this clear and I want there to be no mistake in what I am saying. This is not by accident.” “The driving force in our crisis is a radical progressive agenda fraudulently called criminal justice reform. This is nothing short of a sick and twisted social experiment where law enforcement is the bad guy and criminals are somehow victims of society and not responsible for their actions, their crimes, or accountable to their countless victims.” “Thousands upon thousands of criminals are being released from custody early, crime is increasing and our governor is closing prisons instead of building new ones. It defies common sense. — We are now at our breaking point and Californians have had enough.” I can’t transcribe this all due to X’s text limits but this is an excellent listen.

California Sheriff Is Not Afraid To Speak The Truth “We are here today because California public safety is in crisis. Crime is steadily on the rise and our public safety policy is one of the worst, if not the worst in the nation. I wanna make this clear and I want there to be no mistake in what I am saying. This is not by accident.” “The driving force in our crisis is a radical progressive agenda fraudulently called criminal justice reform. This is nothing short of a sick and twisted social experiment where law enforcement is the bad guy and criminals are somehow victims of society and not responsible for their actions, their crimes, or accountable to their countless victims.” “Thousands upon thousands of criminals are being released from custody early, crime is increasing and our governor is closing prisons instead of building new ones. It defies common sense. — We are now at our breaking point and Californians have had enough.” I can’t transcribe this all due to X’s text limits but this is an excellent listen.

Wall Street Apes

4,350,924 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 14 WITHOUT REASONABLE OR PROPORTIONATE GROUNDS - BREACHING SECTION 17🚨 This is the second time in less than one week the Police have done this to me. Metropolitan Police sort your minions out. Anyone (whether a journalist or a member of the public) has the legal right to observe, record and report protests. Press ID is NOT required to exercise this right. 📜 The law is clear: • Public Order Act 1986, Section 14 - Police may impose conditions on a protest only if they reasonably believe there is a risk of: • serious public disorder • serious damage to property • serious disruption to the life of the community • intimidation intended to compel lawful actions. These powers must be applied on reasonable and proportionate grounds - not arbitrarily. •Public Order Act 2023, Section 17 - A constable must not exercise any power for the sole purpose of preventing someone from observing or reporting on a protest, or from monitoring the police themselves. •Met Police guidance confirms: “Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places, and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel.” 👉🏼 Using Section 14 to silence coverage or deter citizen journalists, without lawful justification is an abuse of power that undermines both press freedom and democratic accountability. 🛑 Intimidation ≠ Law 📷 Recording a protest is not a crime 📝 Citizen journalism is protected #RightToReport #PressFreedom #Section14 #Section17 #Accountability

🚨POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 14 WITHOUT REASONABLE OR PROPORTIONATE GROUNDS - BREACHING SECTION 17🚨 This is the second time in less than one week the Police have done this to me. Metropolitan Police sort your minions out. Anyone (whether a journalist or a member of the public) has the legal right to observe, record and report protests. Press ID is NOT required to exercise this right. 📜 The law is clear: • Public Order Act 1986, Section 14 - Police may impose conditions on a protest only if they reasonably believe there is a risk of: • serious public disorder • serious damage to property • serious disruption to the life of the community • intimidation intended to compel lawful actions. These powers must be applied on reasonable and proportionate grounds - not arbitrarily. •Public Order Act 2023, Section 17 - A constable must not exercise any power for the sole purpose of preventing someone from observing or reporting on a protest, or from monitoring the police themselves. •Met Police guidance confirms: “Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places, and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel.” 👉🏼 Using Section 14 to silence coverage or deter citizen journalists, without lawful justification is an abuse of power that undermines both press freedom and democratic accountability. 🛑 Intimidation ≠ Law 📷 Recording a protest is not a crime 📝 Citizen journalism is protected #RightToReport #PressFreedom #Section14 #Section17 #Accountability

Martin Gauci

28,412 次观看 • 9 个月前

.jeaninepirro: “Now, I want to make something perfectly clear. Violence against anyone in this district will not be tolerated, especially violence, which has hate at its core and is the genesis of violence. The President put me here to do a job to clean up the District, to make sure that crime doesn’t overshadow this phenomenal city, our nation’s capital. And I have, throughout my career, fought anti-Semitism for 32 years as a prosecutor and a judge. I do so, I fight hate crimes with a vengeance, so don’t even think about targeting people in this district because of who they are or because of where they are from. I promise you, justice will be swift and it will be certain and I will work furiously and diligently with my phenomenal staff to make sure that we prosecute every one of these cases. This is the nation’s capital. This is where we celebrate unity. Hate has no place, but justice will rule.”

.jeaninepirro: “Now, I want to make something perfectly clear. Violence against anyone in this district will not be tolerated, especially violence, which has hate at its core and is the genesis of violence. The President put me here to do a job to clean up the District, to make sure that crime doesn’t overshadow this phenomenal city, our nation’s capital. And I have, throughout my career, fought anti-Semitism for 32 years as a prosecutor and a judge. I do so, I fight hate crimes with a vengeance, so don’t even think about targeting people in this district because of who they are or because of where they are from. I promise you, justice will be swift and it will be certain and I will work furiously and diligently with my phenomenal staff to make sure that we prosecute every one of these cases. This is the nation’s capital. This is where we celebrate unity. Hate has no place, but justice will rule.”

Curtis Houck

32,933 次观看 • 11 个月前

WOW 🚨 It turns out the 3 men in Florida being charged with a Felony hate crime for interrupting Muslims praying didn’t have to be charged with felonies The charges were UPGRADED to make an example out of them CAIR praised the quick action, calling it a “vital step” “We have an all-hands-on-deck, five-alarm-fire kind of situation in Tampa. This is from a viral video of three Christian American men who went and heckled a Muslim student association at the University of South Florida, who decided to pray in the parking lot. Not recommended behavior, certainly rude, but now two of the three men have been charged with upgraded charges. They upgraded them to felony hate crime charges because they're Christian Americans who showed up with some bacon and Muhammad jokes. I'm gonna say that again. Christian Americans have been given felony hate crime charges for showing up at a little prayer shindig with some bacon and Muhammad jokes. Again, not recommended behavior. I'm not endorsing what they did, but a hate crime charges? Now, I'm gonna share a map with you. (Shown in video) This map shows the second-biggest religion in every state in the country. Green is Islam. Green here, on this map, is Islam. Second-bi- biggest religion in every state shown in green. And now two Christian men are facing felony hate crime charges for criticizing Islam to their face, for saying that Muhammad, peace be upon him, is burning in hell, which he is. Realize where we are. Realize where we are and stand up now while we still can. Because if they manage to hamstring the majority population with hate speech and hate crime laws for speaking out against Islam, which has no place in Western countries. It has no place in the United States of America. You can call me whatever you want for saying that, I do not care. Then it's all over for us. It's all over.”

WOW 🚨 It turns out the 3 men in Florida being charged with a Felony hate crime for interrupting Muslims praying didn’t have to be charged with felonies The charges were UPGRADED to make an example out of them CAIR praised the quick action, calling it a “vital step” “We have an all-hands-on-deck, five-alarm-fire kind of situation in Tampa. This is from a viral video of three Christian American men who went and heckled a Muslim student association at the University of South Florida, who decided to pray in the parking lot. Not recommended behavior, certainly rude, but now two of the three men have been charged with upgraded charges. They upgraded them to felony hate crime charges because they're Christian Americans who showed up with some bacon and Muhammad jokes. I'm gonna say that again. Christian Americans have been given felony hate crime charges for showing up at a little prayer shindig with some bacon and Muhammad jokes. Again, not recommended behavior. I'm not endorsing what they did, but a hate crime charges? Now, I'm gonna share a map with you. (Shown in video) This map shows the second-biggest religion in every state in the country. Green is Islam. Green here, on this map, is Islam. Second-bi- biggest religion in every state shown in green. And now two Christian men are facing felony hate crime charges for criticizing Islam to their face, for saying that Muhammad, peace be upon him, is burning in hell, which he is. Realize where we are. Realize where we are and stand up now while we still can. Because if they manage to hamstring the majority population with hate speech and hate crime laws for speaking out against Islam, which has no place in Western countries. It has no place in the United States of America. You can call me whatever you want for saying that, I do not care. Then it's all over for us. It's all over.”

Wall Street Apes

678,776 次观看 • 7 个月前

This is not a university in some Islamic country. This prayer was held at UCLA in California. Perhaps some think this is a harmless prayer, something that we can understand as freedom of religion. And just that is a mistake that could destroy the West. This is not a private matter, this shows how hard they could weigh on political decisions. This religious display of power has no place in a university. Praying with such a large group is a manifestation of power which falls under the political piece of Islam. Islam is gaining ground thanks to its presence in everyday life. It’s not just confined to the private sphere as it is with other religions. The words "Allahu akbar" recur every time in a prayer to remind people that "Allah is the greatest" of all gods. In Arabic, "kabir" means "great", "akbar" means "GREATEST". With such manifestations, they want to show their power. And they want to show that they will dominate. This is far from innocent, time to wake up.

This is not a university in some Islamic country. This prayer was held at UCLA in California. Perhaps some think this is a harmless prayer, something that we can understand as freedom of religion. And just that is a mistake that could destroy the West. This is not a private matter, this shows how hard they could weigh on political decisions. This religious display of power has no place in a university. Praying with such a large group is a manifestation of power which falls under the political piece of Islam. Islam is gaining ground thanks to its presence in everyday life. It’s not just confined to the private sphere as it is with other religions. The words "Allahu akbar" recur every time in a prayer to remind people that "Allah is the greatest" of all gods. In Arabic, "kabir" means "great", "akbar" means "GREATEST". With such manifestations, they want to show their power. And they want to show that they will dominate. This is far from innocent, time to wake up.

Darya Safai MP

465,978 次观看 • 2 年前

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

115,251 次观看 • 1 年前

Regina police respond to backlash over weekly call-to-prayer trial Last week, a new mosque in downtown Regina announced that it had tested its outdoor, weatherproof, four-direction call-to-prayer system and that it has a permit from the Regina Police Service to begin a trial period of weekly calls. This was unexpected news for many Regina residents, who have since expressed concerns over the potential regular disruption of peace and the lack of consultation with the community. Regina Police have since issued press releases claiming that the amplification falls within bylaw requirements and discouraging threats targeted at the mosque. On Tuesday’s Rebel Roundup livestream, Sheila Gunn Reid and Lise Merle XX weighed in on the implementation, which appears to have been handled and approved solely by the police service. “From what I understand, Regina city council was not made aware of this,” said Lise. “The City of Regina administration is now aware of it, and fielding calls from a really concerned public — specifically Regina’s Jewish community.” Lise pointed out that Saskatchewan is often used as a “testing ground” to introduce radical ideas like these. “Activists — maybe including Regina Police Service — know that they’re never going to get more pushback than they do in conservative Saskatchewan,” said Lise. “So they test things on us here. And the more people that know that in Saskatchewan, the better.”

Regina police respond to backlash over weekly call-to-prayer trial Last week, a new mosque in downtown Regina announced that it had tested its outdoor, weatherproof, four-direction call-to-prayer system and that it has a permit from the Regina Police Service to begin a trial period of weekly calls. This was unexpected news for many Regina residents, who have since expressed concerns over the potential regular disruption of peace and the lack of consultation with the community. Regina Police have since issued press releases claiming that the amplification falls within bylaw requirements and discouraging threats targeted at the mosque. On Tuesday’s Rebel Roundup livestream, Sheila Gunn Reid and Lise Merle XX weighed in on the implementation, which appears to have been handled and approved solely by the police service. “From what I understand, Regina city council was not made aware of this,” said Lise. “The City of Regina administration is now aware of it, and fielding calls from a really concerned public — specifically Regina’s Jewish community.” Lise pointed out that Saskatchewan is often used as a “testing ground” to introduce radical ideas like these. “Activists — maybe including Regina Police Service — know that they’re never going to get more pushback than they do in conservative Saskatchewan,” said Lise. “So they test things on us here. And the more people that know that in Saskatchewan, the better.”

Rebel News

40,574 次观看 • 20 天前

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025

ELON: WE MUST PUT AN END TO THE TYRANNY OF THE BUREAUCRACY “In order for us to be a true democracy, a functioning democracy, the government must be responsive to the people. That's literally what democracy means. However, when you have a vast unelected bureaucracy that is not answerable to the public, and if the elected officials, the President, the people in Congress and the Senate, if they don't have the power to affect the bureaucracy — and it's actually extremely difficult to affect the bureaucracy — then you do not have rule of the people. Then, you do not have democracy, but you have rule of the bureau — bureaucracy. And this is obviously wrong. It is unconstitutional, and it is imperative, therefore, that we return power to the people of the country and not have tyranny of the bureaucracy, which we most definitely have had to a degree that is absurd. It's not just that there's an unconstitutional fourth branch of the government, but it is arguably the most powerful branch of the government.” Source: DOGE update on 𝕏 Spaces, February 2025

Mario Nawfal

1,738,796 次观看 • 1 年前

As a Pakistani Muslim, I can say this with hand on my heart, if anyone did this to my kids in a school where they’re supposed to learn maths, science, and other academic subjects (not religious studies), I wouldn’t just be angry I’d campaign to make sure it never happens again. We have Muslims trying to force headscarves and religious practices onto kids at school, and as someone who attended an Islamic religious school, I can say with conviction that I don’t want these lunatics teaching my kids about religion. I want my kids to just be kids. If anything, I believe in being a role model for my children, not letting some brainwashed Islamist fill their heads with religious doctrine. I’m also ashamed of the non-Muslim parents proudly putting headscarves on their children as if they’ve achieved something. Let’s be clear, the UK is and always will be a Christian country. I’d love to see how many Muslims would be okay with their kids being forced to wear a nun's dress and a Christian cross or being taught about Christianity. Let’s not pretend, if Muslim kids were taken to a church or a Hindu temple and forced to pray, there would be uproar. So why is it acceptable to randomly start teaching kids about Islam and forcing them to pray? Religion and God are personal matters. If you feel the need to show off your faith to others, maybe take a hard look in the mirror and figure out whether you’re praying for God or for public sympathy. There are already enough problems in this country without worrying about our kids being brainwashed without our permission. The whole education system is doomed when you have criminals going into schools to teach kids how to be good human beings. Let’s focus on raising decent, respectful kids, not forcing them into religious practices they didn’t choose. Let us live in peace, and you live in peace. This is the UK, respect it.

As a Pakistani Muslim, I can say this with hand on my heart, if anyone did this to my kids in a school where they’re supposed to learn maths, science, and other academic subjects (not religious studies), I wouldn’t just be angry I’d campaign to make sure it never happens again. We have Muslims trying to force headscarves and religious practices onto kids at school, and as someone who attended an Islamic religious school, I can say with conviction that I don’t want these lunatics teaching my kids about religion. I want my kids to just be kids. If anything, I believe in being a role model for my children, not letting some brainwashed Islamist fill their heads with religious doctrine. I’m also ashamed of the non-Muslim parents proudly putting headscarves on their children as if they’ve achieved something. Let’s be clear, the UK is and always will be a Christian country. I’d love to see how many Muslims would be okay with their kids being forced to wear a nun's dress and a Christian cross or being taught about Christianity. Let’s not pretend, if Muslim kids were taken to a church or a Hindu temple and forced to pray, there would be uproar. So why is it acceptable to randomly start teaching kids about Islam and forcing them to pray? Religion and God are personal matters. If you feel the need to show off your faith to others, maybe take a hard look in the mirror and figure out whether you’re praying for God or for public sympathy. There are already enough problems in this country without worrying about our kids being brainwashed without our permission. The whole education system is doomed when you have criminals going into schools to teach kids how to be good human beings. Let’s focus on raising decent, respectful kids, not forcing them into religious practices they didn’t choose. Let us live in peace, and you live in peace. This is the UK, respect it.

Sir Shoaib

29,267 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,266,059 次观看 • 1 年前