Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Such a statement from the president's office does not come often. Especially not with this undertone of self-criticism. However, the message is not aimed at the past, but at the current stage of relations - in which, according to the Russian leader, there is no more room for illusions.... Despite efforts to explain Moscow's priorities to the West, the reaction, he says, was largely absent. There was no echo, no attempt to seriously consider the Russian position. "It became clear to me that ideology may play a secondary role, but basically it's all about interests. They are the foundation - that's what determines everything else." These words come at a time when the global system is in motion. Changes are happening quickly, and countries are increasingly building positions based on strength - political, economic, technological. And it is in this context that Putin sees the only way to take Russia seriously - through strengthening his own position. 👇show more

Djole 🇷🇸

69,696 subscribers

272,746 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

4 Kommentare

Profilbild von Djole 🇷🇸

Djole 🇷🇸vor 11 Monaten

🇷🇺‼️Putin: I realized too late - the conflict with the West was not ideological‼️ July 13, 2025 Russian President Vladimir Putin opened a new dimension to his political narrative, admitting that he had misinterpreted the motives behind the West's attitude towards Russia. 👇

Profilbild von Djole 🇷🇸

Djole 🇷🇸vor 11 Monaten

In an interview with Pavlo Zarubin, a well-known journalist on Russian state television, Putin spoke about deep misunderstandings that, he says, he initially mistakenly attributed to ideological differences. But over time, he points out, it became clear that the background is not ideology, but something else - interest. "I thought that the contradictions with the West were primarily ideological. It seemed logical at the time - Cold War inertia, different views of the world, values, the organization of society," Putin said. "But even when the ideology disappeared, when the Soviet Union ceased to exist, the same, almost routine deviation from Russia's interests continued. And it was not because of ideas, but because of the pursuit of advantages - geopolitical, economic, strategic." 👇

Profilbild von Djole 🇷🇸

Djole 🇷🇸vor 11 Monaten

"The world respects only those who can protect themselves," he said. "Until we show that we are an independent and sovereign power that stands behind our interests, there will be no room for anyone to treat us as equals." Geopolitics, as always, does not recognize empty seats. And when ideological frameworks disappear, only interest remains - cold, rational and long-term. For analysts, this statement by the president seems like an attempt to redefine relations with the world: not through calls for understanding, but through positioning based on real power. At this moment, the question that remains open is - how will the world respond to this attitude. Will he try to find a new balance, or will the tensions just move to another field? No one has a precise answer to that. But one thing is clear: if the Russian president has indeed changed his perspective, it could also mark a change of tone in a global game in which no one plays without a goal.

Profilbild von alex glanz

alex glanzvor 11 Monaten

He is a gentleman. The US leaders, The EU leaders, are just not that bright.

Ähnliche Videos

"A bear is a bear": Putin on Russia's role in the alliance with India and China What else the president said: ▪️The bear is a symbol of Russia, but the largest tiger in the world is also Russian ▪️The Russian double-headed eagle looks not only to the west and east, but also to the south ▪️Relations with China and other Asian countries are not tied to the current political situation, but to mutual national interests ▪️Stable international and economic policies of Russia are Moscow's competitive advantage - Ostashko

"A bear is a bear": Putin on Russia's role in the alliance with India and China What else the president said: ▪️The bear is a symbol of Russia, but the largest tiger in the world is also Russian ▪️The Russian double-headed eagle looks not only to the west and east, but also to the south ▪️Relations with China and other Asian countries are not tied to the current political situation, but to mutual national interests ▪️Stable international and economic policies of Russia are Moscow's competitive advantage - Ostashko

Zlatti71

60,664 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 “THIS IS ROMANIA RIGHT NOW” “We are about to be shamed on the international stage… by our own president. And yes — I will say it clearly: He is illegitimate. He is the product of cancelled elections in 2024. A by-product of a system that operated under constant pressure from Brussels. And this is not speculation… This has already been referenced in reporting from the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. This is the reality we are living in. An illegitimate president… taking a position as an observer on the global stage — a role that, in truth, means nothing. No authority. No strength. No sovereignty. It shows something far deeper: A lack of political spine A failure of foreign policy A leadership that does not represent its people And now… He goes there to influence perception — to challenge findings that stated clearly: There was NO evidence of Russian interference. And since then? Nothing. No new proof. No transparency. No accountability. Only silence. Iosefina Pascal

🚨 “THIS IS ROMANIA RIGHT NOW” “We are about to be shamed on the international stage… by our own president. And yes — I will say it clearly: He is illegitimate. He is the product of cancelled elections in 2024. A by-product of a system that operated under constant pressure from Brussels. And this is not speculation… This has already been referenced in reporting from the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. This is the reality we are living in. An illegitimate president… taking a position as an observer on the global stage — a role that, in truth, means nothing. No authority. No strength. No sovereignty. It shows something far deeper: A lack of political spine A failure of foreign policy A leadership that does not represent its people And now… He goes there to influence perception — to challenge findings that stated clearly: There was NO evidence of Russian interference. And since then? Nothing. No new proof. No transparency. No accountability. Only silence. Iosefina Pascal

Jim Ferguson

13,248 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇷🇺🇺🇸 "PUTIN’S MESSAGE TO THE U.S. IS CLEAR: I WILL NOT END THIS WAR" When Putin said he would “take Donbas by force or by surrender,” Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says he was not talking to Ukraine at all. His real target was the American delegation. Her take is that Putin walked into these talks to show strength, not openness. He wanted Washington to see that he is firm in his intentions and has no plan to end the war because no outside pressure can push him there. As China meets Russia at the same moment, Macron travels to Beijing, and NATO warns of a possible preemptive response to Russian hybrid attacks, Stefanishyna says the message behind all this movement is actually simple. Putin is signaling that he cannot be coerced, and the latest meeting with U.S. envoys confirms it. After hours of discussion, she says there was no meaningful progress at all. "Putin was sending a signal first and foremost to the American delegation. He was basically flexing his muscles, showing he is rock solid in his intentions. Nothing could really force him to consider that the war should be over. From what we understand, not much progress was reached after this meeting."

🇷🇺🇺🇸 "PUTIN’S MESSAGE TO THE U.S. IS CLEAR: I WILL NOT END THIS WAR" When Putin said he would “take Donbas by force or by surrender,” Ukrainian Ambassador to the U.S., Olga Stefanishyna, says he was not talking to Ukraine at all. His real target was the American delegation. Her take is that Putin walked into these talks to show strength, not openness. He wanted Washington to see that he is firm in his intentions and has no plan to end the war because no outside pressure can push him there. As China meets Russia at the same moment, Macron travels to Beijing, and NATO warns of a possible preemptive response to Russian hybrid attacks, Stefanishyna says the message behind all this movement is actually simple. Putin is signaling that he cannot be coerced, and the latest meeting with U.S. envoys confirms it. After hours of discussion, she says there was no meaningful progress at all. "Putin was sending a signal first and foremost to the American delegation. He was basically flexing his muscles, showing he is rock solid in his intentions. Nothing could really force him to consider that the war should be over. From what we understand, not much progress was reached after this meeting."

Mario Nawfal

201,425 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

US Vice President J.D. Vance made a sharp statement warning Russia that it will be "very bad" for them if they do not actively engage in "good-faith" negotiations on Ukraine. According to Vance, Trump believes the conflict harms everyone – Russia, Ukraine, and America – and is dissatisfied that Russia allegedly is not sufficiently committed to a peaceful resolution. "And here is what I will say about the president: he is keenly responsive to the reality on the ground. And the reality is this: first, we have conducted incredibly good-faith negotiations with both the Russians and the Ukrainians. And I believe the president is becoming increasingly impatient with the Russians because he feels they are not offering enough to end the war. That is first. Second, the president is increasingly convinced that this war is bad for Russia. You constantly hear this from me. You constantly hear this from the president. The war is bad for Russia. It is bad for Ukraine. It is bad for America. We want the killings to stop. That remains the president's position. But the president can also look at the reality on the ground. He sees economic indicators coming from Eastern Europe. He sees the number of casualties, both Russian and Ukrainian, in this war. And the president tells Vladimir Putin that it is time to stop the killings. He would say this to Zelensky as well, and essentially has said this to Zelensky. He wants this war to end, and he is doing everything possible to stop it. But listen, if the Russians refuse to negotiate in good faith, I think it will be very, very bad for their country. That is what the president has made clear. This is not a change of position. This is an acknowledgment of the reality on the ground. We will continue to fight for peace every day in the Trump administration." They are losing and are desperate to pressure Russia to agree to Minsk 3. What they don’t say is - Russia gave their terms in summer of 2024 and their position has never changed, as such accept and fulfill Russia’s conditions and the war will end .

US Vice President J.D. Vance made a sharp statement warning Russia that it will be "very bad" for them if they do not actively engage in "good-faith" negotiations on Ukraine. According to Vance, Trump believes the conflict harms everyone – Russia, Ukraine, and America – and is dissatisfied that Russia allegedly is not sufficiently committed to a peaceful resolution. "And here is what I will say about the president: he is keenly responsive to the reality on the ground. And the reality is this: first, we have conducted incredibly good-faith negotiations with both the Russians and the Ukrainians. And I believe the president is becoming increasingly impatient with the Russians because he feels they are not offering enough to end the war. That is first. Second, the president is increasingly convinced that this war is bad for Russia. You constantly hear this from me. You constantly hear this from the president. The war is bad for Russia. It is bad for Ukraine. It is bad for America. We want the killings to stop. That remains the president's position. But the president can also look at the reality on the ground. He sees economic indicators coming from Eastern Europe. He sees the number of casualties, both Russian and Ukrainian, in this war. And the president tells Vladimir Putin that it is time to stop the killings. He would say this to Zelensky as well, and essentially has said this to Zelensky. He wants this war to end, and he is doing everything possible to stop it. But listen, if the Russians refuse to negotiate in good faith, I think it will be very, very bad for their country. That is what the president has made clear. This is not a change of position. This is an acknowledgment of the reality on the ground. We will continue to fight for peace every day in the Trump administration." They are losing and are desperate to pressure Russia to agree to Minsk 3. What they don’t say is - Russia gave their terms in summer of 2024 and their position has never changed, as such accept and fulfill Russia’s conditions and the war will end .

Dagny Taggart

55,272 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Yasmina

301,035 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Russian President Putin: "Yes, Western sponsors are supplying a large number of drones of various types, including long-range ones. Some of them, unfortunately for us, are being breaking through. But Russia has a system of air defense. Yes, we must strengthen it, and we will do so, but Ukraine does not have such a system at all. There are just separate elements, but there is no system. There are Patriots, other systems that are being supplied, which are also catastrophically lacking, but there is no system as such. There are no strike systems like those that the Russian Federation has. I mean hypersonic missiles, cruise missiles, and naval, air, and land-based missiles. And there is something else that is the most important. There is patriotism and the will of the Russian people, which is the main condition. We are prepared for the achievement of all the goals and objectives of the special military operation."

Russian President Putin: "Yes, Western sponsors are supplying a large number of drones of various types, including long-range ones. Some of them, unfortunately for us, are being breaking through. But Russia has a system of air defense. Yes, we must strengthen it, and we will do so, but Ukraine does not have such a system at all. There are just separate elements, but there is no system. There are Patriots, other systems that are being supplied, which are also catastrophically lacking, but there is no system as such. There are no strike systems like those that the Russian Federation has. I mean hypersonic missiles, cruise missiles, and naval, air, and land-based missiles. And there is something else that is the most important. There is patriotism and the will of the Russian people, which is the main condition. We are prepared for the achievement of all the goals and objectives of the special military operation."

Status-6 (War & Military News)

15,236 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

🚨 WOW! Sec. Marco Rubio just called the Fake News LIARS to their FACES for saying President Trump is "forcing" Ukraine to take certain negotiating positions with Russia "Despite LEAKS that are not TRUE, despite STORIES out there about us 'forcing' the Ukrainians to take this position or that position, which are NOT true, if we see an opportunity to pull together talks that are productive...we're prepared to play the role." 🔥 "There are no such talks occurring at this time, but we hope that will change because that war can only end with a negotiated settlement. It will not end with a military victory by one side or the other, at least from a traditional standpoint of how military victories are defined."

🚨 WOW! Sec. Marco Rubio just called the Fake News LIARS to their FACES for saying President Trump is "forcing" Ukraine to take certain negotiating positions with Russia "Despite LEAKS that are not TRUE, despite STORIES out there about us 'forcing' the Ukrainians to take this position or that position, which are NOT true, if we see an opportunity to pull together talks that are productive...we're prepared to play the role." 🔥 "There are no such talks occurring at this time, but we hope that will change because that war can only end with a negotiated settlement. It will not end with a military victory by one side or the other, at least from a traditional standpoint of how military victories are defined."

Eric Daugherty

27,765 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Politico named Putin among the biggest losers of the year, and it's true: Ukraine held back Russian attacks; the goals of the "special military operation" were not reached; seized a piece of the Russian Kursk region and continues holding it; Russian economy is in crisis; Putin lost his foothold in Syria and had to apologize for Russia shooting down a civilian aircraft. The myth of the "second army in the world" is gone for good: Russia had to ask North Korea for shells and soldiers. Russian labor shortage is deepening, so Russia is looking for workers in Africa and Asia. A rat in a corner is the most dangerous. It is very important for Putin to look and feel like a winner. So he continues terrorizing Ukraine with more and more strikes and threaten not just Kyiv but the whole West with Oreshnik attacks. Putin doesn't care about human losses and how his people live. Putin wants to go down in history as the great "gatherer of Russian lands" at whatever cost. He wants one thing - to stay in power. Putin is not waging the war with just Ukraine - he is fighting the West and NATO. He sees that the West is afraid of decisive actions, there is no unity and no real readiness to face the challenges. Russia is allowed to earn money for the war using its shadow fleet. Sanctions are working but they allow for loopholes and they are not strong enough. Ukraine is given enough support not to lose but definitely not enough to win. Provocations and sabotage of NATO countries are conveniently overlooked. What conclusions will Russia draw from this? That the West is weak and Russia has the upper hand. Putin sees no point in negotiations and ending the war because he is certain he can get anything he wants. And this is a recipe for an upcoming global disaster. Can it still be stopped? I hope so. Ukraine has bought the West time - with our lives and blood. We are not martyrs. We do not want to sacrifice ourselves. We want peace and justice and security. Time for a wakeup call. Time to truly make Putin the biggest loser. 📹: times during 2024 when Putin and Russia were shown who they really are

Politico named Putin among the biggest losers of the year, and it's true: Ukraine held back Russian attacks; the goals of the "special military operation" were not reached; seized a piece of the Russian Kursk region and continues holding it; Russian economy is in crisis; Putin lost his foothold in Syria and had to apologize for Russia shooting down a civilian aircraft. The myth of the "second army in the world" is gone for good: Russia had to ask North Korea for shells and soldiers. Russian labor shortage is deepening, so Russia is looking for workers in Africa and Asia. A rat in a corner is the most dangerous. It is very important for Putin to look and feel like a winner. So he continues terrorizing Ukraine with more and more strikes and threaten not just Kyiv but the whole West with Oreshnik attacks. Putin doesn't care about human losses and how his people live. Putin wants to go down in history as the great "gatherer of Russian lands" at whatever cost. He wants one thing - to stay in power. Putin is not waging the war with just Ukraine - he is fighting the West and NATO. He sees that the West is afraid of decisive actions, there is no unity and no real readiness to face the challenges. Russia is allowed to earn money for the war using its shadow fleet. Sanctions are working but they allow for loopholes and they are not strong enough. Ukraine is given enough support not to lose but definitely not enough to win. Provocations and sabotage of NATO countries are conveniently overlooked. What conclusions will Russia draw from this? That the West is weak and Russia has the upper hand. Putin sees no point in negotiations and ending the war because he is certain he can get anything he wants. And this is a recipe for an upcoming global disaster. Can it still be stopped? I hope so. Ukraine has bought the West time - with our lives and blood. We are not martyrs. We do not want to sacrifice ourselves. We want peace and justice and security. Time for a wakeup call. Time to truly make Putin the biggest loser. 📹: times during 2024 when Putin and Russia were shown who they really are

Anton Gerashchenko

144,530 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

291,721 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Javier Milei's Bold Stance at Davos: tells WEF they are the problem, not the solution. In a world where political leaders often shy away from speaking their minds, Argentina's President Javier Milei has taken a bold stance at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos. Addressing a room full of global leaders and influencers, Milei made it clear that the current global economic and political systems are not working, and it is time for a change. Milei argued that the WEF's focus on socialism and collectivism is misguided and that the true path to prosperity lies in free enterprise capitalism. He pointed to the success of countries like Singapore and Switzerland, which have embraced free markets and limited government intervention, as examples of what can be achieved when individuals are given the freedom to innovate and create. Many in attendance were taken aback by Milei's candor, but there is no denying that his message resonated with those who believe in the power of the individual to drive progress. Milei's leadership style is refreshing in a world where too many leaders are content to follow the narrative. In conclusion, Javier Milei's speech at Davos was a powerful reminder that true leadership means standing up for what you believe in, even when it is not popular. It is time for more leaders to follow his example and start advocating for real change.

Javier Milei's Bold Stance at Davos: tells WEF they are the problem, not the solution. In a world where political leaders often shy away from speaking their minds, Argentina's President Javier Milei has taken a bold stance at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos. Addressing a room full of global leaders and influencers, Milei made it clear that the current global economic and political systems are not working, and it is time for a change. Milei argued that the WEF's focus on socialism and collectivism is misguided and that the true path to prosperity lies in free enterprise capitalism. He pointed to the success of countries like Singapore and Switzerland, which have embraced free markets and limited government intervention, as examples of what can be achieved when individuals are given the freedom to innovate and create. Many in attendance were taken aback by Milei's candor, but there is no denying that his message resonated with those who believe in the power of the individual to drive progress. Milei's leadership style is refreshing in a world where too many leaders are content to follow the narrative. In conclusion, Javier Milei's speech at Davos was a powerful reminder that true leadership means standing up for what you believe in, even when it is not popular. It is time for more leaders to follow his example and start advocating for real change.

Patriot

760,077 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🧠 “We Do Not Consider Ourselves Responsible for the Deaths” — Putin “We do not consider ourselves responsible for the deaths of people, because we did not start this war. This war began after a state coup in Ukraine in 2014,” — Putin. I honestly don’t even know how to comment on this. All I want is to ask psychiatrists — if there are any among my followers — to diagnose this 🙂 Let’s start with the fact that the state coups happened in Russia, not in Ukraine. A state coup occurred when Russia illegally broke away from the Golden Horde. More than one coup happened in the Russian Empire, where impostors became “tsars” or “emperors” — whatever they chose to call themselves. A state coup happened when Lenin overthrew the tsarist government and made Russia communist — as a result of an illegal seizure of power, the USSR was created. And now — when exactly did a state coup happen in Ukraine? When the President of Ukraine fled, having betrayed Ukraine, and the parliament, which constitutionally holds 50% of power alongside the president, gave him time to return and only then announced new presidential elections, which were recognized by the entire world? Or when the people have power over presidents and have the right to protest? Or maybe dictatorships have never heard that the people can hold power? Yes, perhaps for them any expression of popular will is a “coup”, because they recognize only tyranny by dictators. That is exactly why Putin loves Kim Jong-un, Xi Jinping, Lukashenko, Iranian terrorist leaders, and Orbán — and Trump is trying very hard to join this list. People went out to Maidan because they wanted to live in a free, European country, not in a protectorate of a decaying Russia. And that is exactly when Russia attacked. It was not the US that attacked us. It was not NATO. It was not the EU. It was not Australia or anyone else. Russia attacked us. At that time, there were no talks about NATO. At that time, we did not even have a president yet. That was the beginning of the war. Who, if not Russia, organized it? Especially since Putin himself, in the propaganda film “Crimea. The Way Home”, explicitly stated that Russia had been preparing an attack on Ukraine since 2008, and that when Yanukovych fled, he realized that “the time had come.” In the same film, he described how he ordered Russian soldiers to hide behind women and children as a human shield, so that no Ukrainian soldier would dare to shoot. This film was already called in 2014 a confession for The Hague. And now Putin believes that the West consists of idiots on the level of Russians who might believe this nonsense. You know what? The West is partly to blame — for allowing itself to be manipulated by Putin, for financing his terrorist machine, and for continuing to finance it even now, while letting him manipulate narratives about NATO and everything else. This is not just cynicism. This is psychopathy — not even at a state level, but at a federal one, because Russia has never had real statehood. Russia is a “union” of occupied states — this is literally written in the Russian Constitution. The Russian state does not exist. What exists is the Russian Federation, where Buryats have their own state, Chechens have their own state — even if occupied and without real governments, on paper these states exist. But Russians themselves do not have their own state. And perhaps it is precisely because of these complexes that Russia spews such nonsense. Because of these complexes it steals history and lies. Because of fear it wages wars. But Russia could have simply built its own state and developed it. Instead, it lives in ruins and only spreads these ruins outward. Isn’t that psychopathy?

🧠 “We Do Not Consider Ourselves Responsible for the Deaths” — Putin “We do not consider ourselves responsible for the deaths of people, because we did not start this war. This war began after a state coup in Ukraine in 2014,” — Putin. I honestly don’t even know how to comment on this. All I want is to ask psychiatrists — if there are any among my followers — to diagnose this 🙂 Let’s start with the fact that the state coups happened in Russia, not in Ukraine. A state coup occurred when Russia illegally broke away from the Golden Horde. More than one coup happened in the Russian Empire, where impostors became “tsars” or “emperors” — whatever they chose to call themselves. A state coup happened when Lenin overthrew the tsarist government and made Russia communist — as a result of an illegal seizure of power, the USSR was created. And now — when exactly did a state coup happen in Ukraine? When the President of Ukraine fled, having betrayed Ukraine, and the parliament, which constitutionally holds 50% of power alongside the president, gave him time to return and only then announced new presidential elections, which were recognized by the entire world? Or when the people have power over presidents and have the right to protest? Or maybe dictatorships have never heard that the people can hold power? Yes, perhaps for them any expression of popular will is a “coup”, because they recognize only tyranny by dictators. That is exactly why Putin loves Kim Jong-un, Xi Jinping, Lukashenko, Iranian terrorist leaders, and Orbán — and Trump is trying very hard to join this list. People went out to Maidan because they wanted to live in a free, European country, not in a protectorate of a decaying Russia. And that is exactly when Russia attacked. It was not the US that attacked us. It was not NATO. It was not the EU. It was not Australia or anyone else. Russia attacked us. At that time, there were no talks about NATO. At that time, we did not even have a president yet. That was the beginning of the war. Who, if not Russia, organized it? Especially since Putin himself, in the propaganda film “Crimea. The Way Home”, explicitly stated that Russia had been preparing an attack on Ukraine since 2008, and that when Yanukovych fled, he realized that “the time had come.” In the same film, he described how he ordered Russian soldiers to hide behind women and children as a human shield, so that no Ukrainian soldier would dare to shoot. This film was already called in 2014 a confession for The Hague. And now Putin believes that the West consists of idiots on the level of Russians who might believe this nonsense. You know what? The West is partly to blame — for allowing itself to be manipulated by Putin, for financing his terrorist machine, and for continuing to finance it even now, while letting him manipulate narratives about NATO and everything else. This is not just cynicism. This is psychopathy — not even at a state level, but at a federal one, because Russia has never had real statehood. Russia is a “union” of occupied states — this is literally written in the Russian Constitution. The Russian state does not exist. What exists is the Russian Federation, where Buryats have their own state, Chechens have their own state — even if occupied and without real governments, on paper these states exist. But Russians themselves do not have their own state. And perhaps it is precisely because of these complexes that Russia spews such nonsense. Because of these complexes it steals history and lies. Because of fear it wages wars. But Russia could have simply built its own state and developed it. Instead, it lives in ruins and only spreads these ruins outward. Isn’t that psychopathy?

Devana 🇺🇦

20,401 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

LCI Correspondent Provokes Orban -There is a French proverb: ‘Kiss the hand you dare not bite’. Is that your position? Do you kiss the hand of the Russians because you are afraid of them? -No, no, not at all. On the contrary. I think that only the language of force is understood by the Russians. And Europe must be strong. We must negotiate from a position of strength. Unfortunately, we are weak now. That is why we need the Americans. But in the long term, Europe must strengthen itself. There must be a strategic agreement with Russia. But only a strong Europe can achieve this. -There are two approaches to Vladimir Putin: the approach of President Macron, Chancellor Scholz, Keir Starmer and yours. You are close to Putin. How far can this closeness go? What do you want? Do you want, for example, for Putin to be able to appear in Europe again? Will you accept him in Hungary? -We must not think about Putin, but about ourselves. We do not measure Europe by Putin. We have our own interests. We must be strong – both with Russia and against it. The President of Russia is the President of the Russians. If he wants to come to Hungary, he will be received with all the honors, as is due. - SK

LCI Correspondent Provokes Orban -There is a French proverb: ‘Kiss the hand you dare not bite’. Is that your position? Do you kiss the hand of the Russians because you are afraid of them? -No, no, not at all. On the contrary. I think that only the language of force is understood by the Russians. And Europe must be strong. We must negotiate from a position of strength. Unfortunately, we are weak now. That is why we need the Americans. But in the long term, Europe must strengthen itself. There must be a strategic agreement with Russia. But only a strong Europe can achieve this. -There are two approaches to Vladimir Putin: the approach of President Macron, Chancellor Scholz, Keir Starmer and yours. You are close to Putin. How far can this closeness go? What do you want? Do you want, for example, for Putin to be able to appear in Europe again? Will you accept him in Hungary? -We must not think about Putin, but about ourselves. We do not measure Europe by Putin. We have our own interests. We must be strong – both with Russia and against it. The President of Russia is the President of the Russians. If he wants to come to Hungary, he will be received with all the honors, as is due. - SK

Zlatti71

23,789 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

'How can we meet with a person who is pretending to be a leader?' – Lavrov on Zelensky's demands to hold a meeting with Putin. - President Putin clearly stated that he is ready to meet on the condition that this meeting has a real agenda — a presidential agenda. - So that's a big 'if.' The meeting is not scheduled, Mr. Minister. You say there is no meeting now. - Kristen, sorry that you are not listening: there is no meeting, and I do not dispute that, but you seem not to understand what I am saying. Putin is ready to meet with Zelensky only when the agenda for the summit is ready. And there is no such agenda yet at all. After the meeting in Anchorage, President Trump proposed several points with which we agree, and on some we agreed to show flexibility. When President Trump raised these issues at the meeting in Washington, in the presence of Zelensky and his European sponsors, it became clear to everyone: there are several principles that Washington believes must be accepted, including: no NATO membership; discussion of territorial issues. Zelensky said 'no' to everything. He even refused, as I have already said, to repeal the law banning the Russian language. How can we meet with a person who is pretending to be a leader? - SK

'How can we meet with a person who is pretending to be a leader?' – Lavrov on Zelensky's demands to hold a meeting with Putin. - President Putin clearly stated that he is ready to meet on the condition that this meeting has a real agenda — a presidential agenda. - So that's a big 'if.' The meeting is not scheduled, Mr. Minister. You say there is no meeting now. - Kristen, sorry that you are not listening: there is no meeting, and I do not dispute that, but you seem not to understand what I am saying. Putin is ready to meet with Zelensky only when the agenda for the summit is ready. And there is no such agenda yet at all. After the meeting in Anchorage, President Trump proposed several points with which we agree, and on some we agreed to show flexibility. When President Trump raised these issues at the meeting in Washington, in the presence of Zelensky and his European sponsors, it became clear to everyone: there are several principles that Washington believes must be accepted, including: no NATO membership; discussion of territorial issues. Zelensky said 'no' to everything. He even refused, as I have already said, to repeal the law banning the Russian language. How can we meet with a person who is pretending to be a leader? - SK

Zlatti71

57,176 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Russian propagandist Simonyan talks about the great sacred war that is not being fought against Ukraine. Take a listen. Putin and his inner circle have stopped talking about peace and negotiations and are raising the stakes. They speak of a "great and sacred war" against Europe and NATO. Why is this happening? It is a consequence of Russia’s failures on the Ukrainian front, where Russians are not advancing and are losing more and more soldiers - over 35,000 every month, more than they recruit - while Ukrainians are expanding the kill zone. It is the growing economic problems and the realization that Russia is heading toward collapse. It is the realization that everyone involved in the war will be punished after it ends, which means they cannot allow the war to end. Putin’s inner circle is aware of this dead-end situation. But Putin himself does not know the real picture, because people are afraid to tell him the truth. Therefore, Putin is convinced that he is winning the war. In addition, he sees that the United States is currently focused on the war in Iran and is no longer reacting to massive attacks on Ukraine and hybrid attacks in Europe. By the way, it is quite possible that the latest attack on Kyiv was organized personally for Putin - to give him the satisfaction of seeing Kyiv burning, especially after the humiliating May 9 parade in Moscow - but in reality, this attack achieved no military objectives and was a waste of millions. In this situation, with no real military successes in Ukraine, Putin’s inner circle, out of fear, may develop a desire to continue the war in a new direction - for example against the Baltic states - so that Putin stops asking about Donbas and Mala Tokmachka. The greater the defeat, the higher the stakes.

Russian propagandist Simonyan talks about the great sacred war that is not being fought against Ukraine. Take a listen. Putin and his inner circle have stopped talking about peace and negotiations and are raising the stakes. They speak of a "great and sacred war" against Europe and NATO. Why is this happening? It is a consequence of Russia’s failures on the Ukrainian front, where Russians are not advancing and are losing more and more soldiers - over 35,000 every month, more than they recruit - while Ukrainians are expanding the kill zone. It is the growing economic problems and the realization that Russia is heading toward collapse. It is the realization that everyone involved in the war will be punished after it ends, which means they cannot allow the war to end. Putin’s inner circle is aware of this dead-end situation. But Putin himself does not know the real picture, because people are afraid to tell him the truth. Therefore, Putin is convinced that he is winning the war. In addition, he sees that the United States is currently focused on the war in Iran and is no longer reacting to massive attacks on Ukraine and hybrid attacks in Europe. By the way, it is quite possible that the latest attack on Kyiv was organized personally for Putin - to give him the satisfaction of seeing Kyiv burning, especially after the humiliating May 9 parade in Moscow - but in reality, this attack achieved no military objectives and was a waste of millions. In this situation, with no real military successes in Ukraine, Putin’s inner circle, out of fear, may develop a desire to continue the war in a new direction - for example against the Baltic states - so that Putin stops asking about Donbas and Mala Tokmachka. The greater the defeat, the higher the stakes.

Anton Gerashchenko

402,785 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

❗️Zelenskyy: "Russian troops are exerting pressure, but this does not mean that we are ready to surrender." Answering a question about the situation on the front, Zelenskyy said that "the situation on the battlefield is difficult. There are more and more Russians, it is becoming harder and harder." "I came to Kupiansk; the situation there was not easy. The front line was very close. However, our Armed Forces control Kupiansk." The President of Ukraine acknowledged that Russian troops "are exerting pressure." "Undoubtedly, they can destroy a village—one, another, they can enter there. We will do everything to preserve the lives of our soldiers, because we must first and foremost have armed forces. This does not mean at all that we are ready to surrender."

❗️Zelenskyy: "Russian troops are exerting pressure, but this does not mean that we are ready to surrender." Answering a question about the situation on the front, Zelenskyy said that "the situation on the battlefield is difficult. There are more and more Russians, it is becoming harder and harder." "I came to Kupiansk; the situation there was not easy. The front line was very close. However, our Armed Forces control Kupiansk." The President of Ukraine acknowledged that Russian troops "are exerting pressure." "Undoubtedly, they can destroy a village—one, another, they can enter there. We will do everything to preserve the lives of our soldiers, because we must first and foremost have armed forces. This does not mean at all that we are ready to surrender."

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

73,768 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Macron is sniping from under the negotiating table. 'Who constantly said "no, no, no" to American proposals? Who said "no" to the US President? Who said "no" to all the envoys he received? Russia. Therefore, yes - the negotiations are not going very well, because there is a side that constantly says "no" and does not want peace. I hope that one day they will say they want peace, but for now, that's not the case. Thus, Russia's position forces us to view this more as their problem, rather than ours, that is, we just need to take this seriously.' - SK

Macron is sniping from under the negotiating table. 'Who constantly said "no, no, no" to American proposals? Who said "no" to the US President? Who said "no" to all the envoys he received? Russia. Therefore, yes - the negotiations are not going very well, because there is a side that constantly says "no" and does not want peace. I hope that one day they will say they want peace, but for now, that's not the case. Thus, Russia's position forces us to view this more as their problem, rather than ours, that is, we just need to take this seriously.' - SK

Zlatti71

15,054 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Rutte called Putin the governor of Texas and stated that he does not care about Russia's opinion on NATO troops in Ukraine. "Why should we care what Russia thinks about troops in Ukraine? That is not for Russia to decide. Honestly, I am amazed. I'm not criticizing you, but I often hear this question. Thank you for asking it, but I am really surprised. Russia has nothing to do with this at all. It's the same as if Finland had to get 'permission' from Russia to join NATO. Of course not. And Sweden too — no. When we created NATO in the past, we were sovereign countries. Ukraine is a sovereign country. If Ukraine wants to have forces to ensure security on its territory to support peace — that is its decision. No one else can decide on that. And I think we really need to stop making Putin too powerful. He is like the governor of Texas, no more. So we shouldn't take it too seriously." - SK

Rutte called Putin the governor of Texas and stated that he does not care about Russia's opinion on NATO troops in Ukraine. "Why should we care what Russia thinks about troops in Ukraine? That is not for Russia to decide. Honestly, I am amazed. I'm not criticizing you, but I often hear this question. Thank you for asking it, but I am really surprised. Russia has nothing to do with this at all. It's the same as if Finland had to get 'permission' from Russia to join NATO. Of course not. And Sweden too — no. When we created NATO in the past, we were sovereign countries. Ukraine is a sovereign country. If Ukraine wants to have forces to ensure security on its territory to support peace — that is its decision. No one else can decide on that. And I think we really need to stop making Putin too powerful. He is like the governor of Texas, no more. So we shouldn't take it too seriously." - SK

Zlatti71

240,855 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

☝️“In one of the US laws that explicitly mentions Russia, the stated goal is to "democratize" the Russian Federation. Can you imagine us setting a goal in our own domestic legislation to "democratize" the United States? You know, that is at least impolite. But in principle, we could do it, and there are reasons for that. Everyone is well aware that twice in US history, a president has come to power who was elected by a majority of electors but had a minority of voters behind him. Is that democratic? No. Democracy is the power of the people, the power of the majority. How is it possible that a person is elected to the highest office in the state by a minority of voters? There is such a problem in the US Constitution. But we are not demanding that you change your Constitution, are we?” - President Putin.

☝️“In one of the US laws that explicitly mentions Russia, the stated goal is to "democratize" the Russian Federation. Can you imagine us setting a goal in our own domestic legislation to "democratize" the United States? You know, that is at least impolite. But in principle, we could do it, and there are reasons for that. Everyone is well aware that twice in US history, a president has come to power who was elected by a majority of electors but had a minority of voters behind him. Is that democratic? No. Democracy is the power of the people, the power of the majority. How is it possible that a person is elected to the highest office in the state by a minority of voters? There is such a problem in the US Constitution. But we are not demanding that you change your Constitution, are we?” - President Putin.

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

249,223 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Today, air raid sirens across Ukraine have sounded almost the entire day. Overnight, there was yet another Russian attack with missiles and drones—ballistic strikes and more than 140 attack drones in a single night. It was loud in Kyiv and in other cities. Tragically, there are wounded and killed. My condolences to all the families affected. Rescue efforts continue all day in Kharkiv, Sumy, and the capital. It is entirely fair that the Russian sky—the sky of the aggressor—is not calm either today. Ukraine’s proposal for a ceasefire of at least 30 days still stands, we are not withdrawing it, as it offers a real chance for diplomacy. But it is Russia that the world sees giving no answer—no response except for new strikes. This clearly and obviously shows who is the source of this war. Russia must end its aggression—and it will have to. The only question is time. War is a loss for everyone, including the aggressor.

Today, air raid sirens across Ukraine have sounded almost the entire day. Overnight, there was yet another Russian attack with missiles and drones—ballistic strikes and more than 140 attack drones in a single night. It was loud in Kyiv and in other cities. Tragically, there are wounded and killed. My condolences to all the families affected. Rescue efforts continue all day in Kharkiv, Sumy, and the capital. It is entirely fair that the Russian sky—the sky of the aggressor—is not calm either today. Ukraine’s proposal for a ceasefire of at least 30 days still stands, we are not withdrawing it, as it offers a real chance for diplomacy. But it is Russia that the world sees giving no answer—no response except for new strikes. This clearly and obviously shows who is the source of this war. Russia must end its aggression—and it will have to. The only question is time. War is a loss for everyone, including the aggressor.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

493,954 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jonathan Turley on the Russia Hoax: "The problem with Democrats and the media is that they're trying to run the same grift on the same marks...They're trying to tell the public, 'Don't look at this stuff, there's nothing to see here.' The public largely rejected that whole pitch when they reelected Donald Trump; it's not going to really work. This is really damning stuff. What was just released, in my view, undermines the testimony of people like John Brennan, but what Ratcliffe is talking about is exposing it all to show the public exactly what happened. This is the real Russian conspiracy. There wasn't a Russian collusion conspiracy, but there was a Russian conspiracy: it's when John Brennan went to Obama in 2016..."

Jonathan Turley on the Russia Hoax: "The problem with Democrats and the media is that they're trying to run the same grift on the same marks...They're trying to tell the public, 'Don't look at this stuff, there's nothing to see here.' The public largely rejected that whole pitch when they reelected Donald Trump; it's not going to really work. This is really damning stuff. What was just released, in my view, undermines the testimony of people like John Brennan, but what Ratcliffe is talking about is exposing it all to show the public exactly what happened. This is the real Russian conspiracy. There wasn't a Russian collusion conspiracy, but there was a Russian conspiracy: it's when John Brennan went to Obama in 2016..."

Julia 🇺🇸

131,065 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten